I understand that topics like this can evoke strong emotions, and I respect your right to share your opinion. However, it’s important to remember the role of journalism in investigating all sides of a story, especially in cases where someone has been convicted of a serious crime and there are claims of innocence or a miscarriage of justice. Teklehaimanot approached the interview from a professional standpoint, seeking truth rather than relying on emotion. As we know, wrongful convictions do happen, and exploring these cases is essential. Critiquing his work based on personal feelings might overlook the value of examining such complex and sensitive issues. I also noticed you mentioned that the journalist is only interested in making money and not humanity, but I believe that could be an exaggeration. His work seems to focus more on giving a voice to those who feel unheard, which is crucial in cases like this. I’m not sure if you have a personal issue with him, but I would encourage everyone to focus on the facts and keep the discussion respectful. After all, in any debate or discussion, especially one as serious as this, it's important to consider all perspectives without letting emotions cloud the search for truth.