the word turk means who obeys the law of God Tengri. Our ancestors called themselves as turuk tengri. Because the word law in old turkic is "tör" and "török or turuk means who obeys this law. So I cant imagine how turkish can be muslim ?) Turk only can be tengrist. U can not call yourself turuk and be muslim at the same time. Our ancestors never wanted u to convert to any religion that could separate us from each other. So thats why they were tengrist.

Wrong explanation Turk includes both the Turkic and Turkish and the Turkic includes the Turkish, Kazakh etc. you westerners love to complicate simple things and usually don't ask for advice from the people you are trying to categorize lol

This is how the transition was made from Romanian to Germanic languages? 🤯 Mind boggling. Btw. All romanic languages developed individually from each other out ofba protoromanian language Pre-Latin. It is not true that languages got Latinized. The best example is LaDin and Romanian having almost exactly the same numbers while in Latin is totally different, and while LaDin Dolomites and Romanians never ever met each other. Even more so is Romanian and Aromanian, Istroromanian and other types of Romanian languages from so called Vlachs that never met each other and developed independently of each other. While the romanic words they speak are exactly as in Romanian and not in Latin. What a huge lie they taught us that we were Latinized by the Romans. Romans occupied only 1/4 of Dacia for only 140 years, while the rest of Dacia was free. And yet the whole Dacian territory south from Danube to Nistru, speak Romanian. Romania was under Ottoman and Austria-Hungarian occupation for 500 respectively 300 years and yet no Romanians spoke any of these languages nor do they speak them today. All romance languages developed from a romanic language. Even Greek developed from Romaniek. But it was not Latin. Maybe even Rome came into existence due to the tribe with a name Roma. Just like the Gypsies. The whole Europe is colonized by the Dacians and Sarmatians that were the Lost tribes of Dan (Dacians) and the Samaritans. The tribe of Dan must have speak Romanian. As the first Jews in Greece call themselves also Romanians. It is complicated, but we all in Europe are a Semitic population. Dacians and the Sarmatians colonized Italy, Sardinia, Corsica, Scandinavia, Danmark, Holland, Ireland and Scotland, as well as Ukraine, Yugo-Slavia, Russia and Greece. Etruscans were Israel lost tribes that fled from Egypt. The tribe of Dan co-existed with Phoenicians. The Jews colonized Iberic Peninsula, France and Wallonia and England. It is a huge mess up. See The Serpent's Trail of the lost tribes of Israel. The lost tribe of Dan. See also The Hebrew Origin of Serbs.

6:51 whenever i watch a video about any lanugage and this is said, my heart breaks (plus a language being banning)

Turks in turkey arent real Turks. Real turks are in central asia. Turks in Turkey are anatolian, roman, greek, and armenian genetics

Isn't this similar to or the same as yodeling?

Damn it, now I have to like for how well "Becky, Look at her butt" fits with "The Irish Washer Woman"...

Thanks for mentioning iraqi turkmens! Love from Turkmeneli region of iraq ❤

The Ottomans are not Turks, they are Arabs and now they call themselves Turkey, although they are more Arab Greeks

Nicely explained. Maybe "oghuz" language subgroup could have been mentioned when talking about Turkoman Languages but fast and well rounded. But on a second thought Turk and Turkic(in mid-east languages it is Turki) are same root's conjugations maybe that and a little more bit of a grammatical explanation is required too :) BTW Turkic Languages are full of suffixes and their conjugations literally create new words with semantics of maybe 3-4 sometimes 6 or more words in say, English. Also needless to say Turkish language is a bit... mixed. I see it as richness. Its vocabulary is an incredible lexicon of countless different roots. Grammar stays Turkic, and ofcourse the root words, the "organic" words stay the same but the rest is amazingly colorful. French, English, Arabic, Armenian, Greek, Persian, Italian, Chinese, Mongolian, Sogdian and many more rooted words are present but wait for it... There are several hundred SUMERIAN words in Turkish. :))) This is the language of massive multi-cultured steppe nomad empires and then more empires. It's natural if you think about it but still it's interesting.

@ABSOLUTELILT do a great job lilting, if anyone is looking for more

It's the same situation in Flanders, Belgium. Officially the term Flemish is used to refer to the Belgian variant of the official Dutch language, and all the regions have their own "dialects" of Flemish. But in reality, the original Flemish language is a continuum around West-Flanders, and this West-Flemish is a close sibling of the Dutch language, not a derivative. The "Flemish" people speak on TV is a more recent construct which has been more influenced by Dutch and the Brabantian language sibling than authentic Flemish. And of course, West Flemish, authentic Flemish, is disappearing.

The funny thing is that the languages are so old that even people from cities just a fiew kilometers apart can speak a different version of the same dialect with even some radical changes, because in old times they didn't really have that many means of communication. Some people even ridicolize and/or criticize the dialect from the city near them!

Brilliant, funny, and inspiring. Really enjoyed this, thank you!

8:33 Down with the CCP!!!

The real Turks are those who live in Asia.

Oh my God that keyboard sound made me orgasm.

Very nice!

I agree sono d’accordo

The term Turk is not used for Asian tribes, but for the Asene tribe and those who are related to them. stop indo european racism

İn Turkey, we call ourselves and all Turks "TÜRK". But in English, we have seperate word that defines Turks from Turkey and also their language, "TURKİSH". And Turkic defines language family. All Turks speaks a Turkic language. But again, in Turkey we aren't using this term and we call all turkic languages "TÜRKÇE" including Turkish. "KAZAK TÜRKÇESİ" means kazakh language. Don't forget that we Turks are one nation. Kazakh, Uzbek or Uyghur aren't a nation name. They're tribe names. So sad thing is, there is word "Turk" in Turkey's name but not in kazakhstan or kyrgyztan. İmperial Russia named them with their tribe's name. Kazakhstan's formal name should be "kazakh turk republic". And also, before Russian invasions, there were just two Turkic dialects. Ottoman empire were using Western Turkish and from tatarstan to afghanistan, all turkestan turks were using Eastern Turkish/Chagatai Turkish.

The exact same is the case for all Germanic languages. I speak Gronings Low Saxon (from the Netherlands) and I can communicate well with people far into Northern Germany, but will have to switch to Dutch to be able to talk to people from the other side of my own tiny country. Most Germanic varieties are just as threatened as the Romance ones, sadly. It is a kind of cultural erasure, and when there are state policies against regional varieties, it could even be called linguicide. Such policies and 'one country - one language'-type mindsets have been present in most of Europe for the last century. Lately, there are some initiatives such as the European charter for regional and minority languages, and in some places, the stigma on the own local variety which is deeply ingrained in older people, is less present in younger generations. But in many places, a large part of the older generation people did not pass on the local language to the next generation. So, although due to population growth the number of speakers may grow, it grows a lot more slowly than the part of people that only speak the standard/roof language. I'm not sure what to do about it either. Perhaps we just need more opportunities for education in and about the local language within the regular school system..

I'm Italian from Lombardia. My parents always spoke the local dialect between them, so I learned it from them without that they taught me and I can understand it. It is impressive how children can easily learn a new language and switch between languages learned in their childhood as if they are the same. Schools never teach it; the perception is that this was the language of people that grew in a period with poor education. So it gradually disappears, as the new generations of parents won't speak in dialect any more and their children won't learn it. It's sad to know that italian was derived from one dialect and the others were doomed to disappear. The education system should have done something to preserve our culture and the identity of each region

I'm a native romansh speaker. Good Research! Well done. However, both videos you showed are actually romontsch sursilvan (the largest idiom) an not rumantsch grischun. Thank you for bringing attention to our beatiful language❤

Doesn’t Popeye lilt hie sailor’s song through lilting? Or, maybe I do because I can’t remember the tune, but like the melody.

It seems to me that there is also some connection to professional auctioneers around the US.

Could you give me the name of the piece of sheet music you showed at the end of this video?

knickety-knackety (as in The Wee Cooper of Fife) (a Scottish song?) I believe there is a vocal version of great highland bagpipe playing which was once the main medium for teaching.

The Catalan game plan should be applied to all these languages. Schools half in the local language and half in the lingua franca, all road signs in the local language, all business and signs in the local language. Linguistic diversity should be celebrated.

The invention of 'Celtic Culture' is incredible - look at the tambourine aka the bodhran …

I'm Irish, and honestly, its not a particularly special form of music making. It's just another version of humming a tune. Anyone in the world could do it. Let's not make it cultural when it's nothing of the kind.

Makes me think about how babies have better sense of rhythm if they listen to it frequently

Three syllables for jigs since they’re in 3/4 time. Also useful anytime there are triplets in the tune.

I just felt into a hole when listening to Cranberries's Zombie and found myself here. Amazing content and editing!

What a mess 😂😂😂😂😂

In Switzerland, they speak Swiss-German which is different from German. However, business people revert to German in official discussions. It's weird, but it's part of the culture.

Ce am inteles, ca vorbitor de limba romana: (strunele) remarcabile vin dintr-un instrument foarte rar, lira, care in tarile crestine suna...

Great video very educational and right to the point

btw Türkiye means "Turk's" "-iye" ise Possessive affix. Exmp; Mecidiyeköy is neighbourhood in the municipality and district of Şişli in İstanbul. Mecid is Ottoman ruler, köy ise village. So Mecidiyeköy means Mecid'in Köyü, Mecid's village.

The Turks now are Europeanized Mesopotamian people who have been Turkified. Their faces are Caucasian but their language is Mongoloid.

Reminds me of scatting in jazz to a degree

Totally lilting the jolly beggarman at work this morning.

Bu arada şunu farkettim biz Türkler olmasa türki dediğimiz tüm milletler ski tutmuştu

It is Turk bro. We just feed it to you so you don't get scared😂😂

Part of nation building is linguistic unification. The same thing happened among Serbs and Croats, when the two languages reformed together forming the Serbo-Croatian language as it exists today. Even though they are now politically divided, the two people can completely understand each other in all of Serbia, Montenegro, Bosnia and Croatia.

today most turks have greek origins than armenian kurdish persian georgian arabian albanian bosnian slavic and only about 6% are original turks invaders from kazakstan and turkmenistan free greek konstantinupolis!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Quanta ignoranza.

luckily I speak ladin, which is slightly less endangered (in theory)

Turki, Turkic, refers to Türük Törük Török on proto Turkic languages and all proto tribes call themselves as Türük. Turkic is a scientific liguistic term. They are neighbourish tribes-big families. All these neighbour tribes are now naitions, countries. Of coarse Turkish citizen GENs are very differenciated. Probably mid-asia Turkic nation are more Turkic than Türkiye Türks. All these nations call themselves their own names of nations. A Kazakh names himself as kazakh but they accept they are Turkic. So Turkiye Turkish people are also Turkic. Türkiye, Kazakistan, yakutistan names are given by Europeans, Russians actually. Russia calls Saxa nation as Yakut. English-french call Ottoman as Turks. Russia call Azeri but they call Azerbaycan themselves. names of the country is not scientific. It is choosable.

I studied abroad in florence with 3 years of italian classes under my belt thinking I was prepared ... I couldn't understand anything anyone was saying. Don't learn italian unless all you want to do is listen to italian news broadcasts, it's a total waste of time! I'm joking, but only to emphasize the point you're making in this video, that political "realities" are almost always imaginary, completely imaginary but then enforced upon reality. Where you see languages dying out, egalitarian that I am I would agree that you are seeing injustice and I would elaborate - consider for a moment, a different (right wing?) perspective, which says when you see language "death" you are simply seeing the evolution of human culture - the centers of economic and technological and military strength in the world either A) became that way in the first place by dominating their neighbors, or B) became an economic center first, then needed to raise an army to protect their wealth from bands of traveling raiders, then eventually were tempted to use their military defense force for offense. History since the beginning of permanent dwellings is wrought with tales of this relationship between cities, nomadic warrior tribes, and everybody else who is just doing their thing out in the world trying to avoid getting wrapped up ing the activity of the heavy hitters. But anyway the point being that killing languages, or at least pulling their fangs, is important for the dominating culture to be able to effectively control large amounts of people. Language is culture, after all, and if you can kill and replace people's culture then you don't have to literally kill them, because your culture has effectively absorbed them. Why, for example, does every country in the world (well as far as I know) have only 1 capital city? "Capital", coming from the Latin caput, meaning "head". Why, to run a country, do you need only one city to be the "head"? Before there were countries there were city states, which could be just as large or larger than modern countries. They were called that because thats exactly what they were, areas under the direct influence or control of the power emanating from some city, some giant gathering of people somewhere being busy busy busy and exploiting the land and people around them. A state is by definition an injustice ... although of course there are counter arguments about the eventual shared advantages of unified efforts under a central authority, but I'll leave that for you to put in your pipe and smoke