I figured I should analyze the signal on the oscilloscope and focus on the positive and negative peaks for detecting voids, especially air-filled ones. Am I wasting my time?! 🤦♀😅
@BGIS20002 ай бұрын
Would you able to make a new video of this topic that explains steps and knowledge behind. Thank
@BGIS20003 ай бұрын
Hello, i do like your videos and follow you. It would be great to explain how do you identify rebar corrision by using color pallette of rainbow or similar color pallette that has multiple colors. I know left negative and rights are positive. If rebar has corrosion it may not be conductive or less conductive in this case what color are you looking if you are using rainbow palette? I hope i am not confusing you. 😊
@BGIS20005 ай бұрын
Would like to see more videos of you in the future. Thank you!
@vanstewart36076 ай бұрын
Thanks very helpful hope to use it soon
@hoandang50336 ай бұрын
Hi, can you share the data used on this webinar. Its better to follow your move in Realtime
@geolitix5 ай бұрын
Unfortunately, we can’t share the raw data used in this video since it comes from a user who gave us permission to use the files for the video. If you would like to learn more about Geolitix’s features and capabilities, please feel free to explore the rest of our KZbin videos or visit geolitix.com
@MohdSolehAminMatJunoh6 ай бұрын
Sir, lets say the GPR scan were collected parallel line with 0.5m interval and without GPS coordinate, which pattern position should I use?
@geolitix5 ай бұрын
The latest version of Geolitix automatically understands if your project has GPS or not. So, when you import your data with parallel lines every 50 cm, Geolitix will understand that there is no GPS and you may need to define the pattern under positioning. If you are using a modern GPR which saves the original grid geometry, Geolitix will read that in and you won’t need to manually define the parameters.
@mustafaali79077 ай бұрын
Thanks so much.
@mustafaali79077 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for video
@RolandMollison8 ай бұрын
Yes!
@Ashok8808a8 ай бұрын
Hi ..when it is required to DC shift removal and will it be befor e time zero correction or after
@geolitix6 ай бұрын
DC Shift isn’t usually needed with modern GPR systems. It was more commonly used with analogue instruments. If it was needed, usually it would be performed after time zero correction.
@aksara.badminton490910 ай бұрын
So the green color in 3d model generated is based on line u traces it before?
@geolitix9 ай бұрын
Yes, and it can be exported in many formats, including Shapefiles, DXF and CSV files. Or, you can use those interpretations to create a depth surface, which itself can be exported as a 3D DXF surface, or a Surfer GRD file.
@EmmanuelFASINA-w5u Жыл бұрын
That was great.
@samroberts61932 жыл бұрын
Really Useful - thanks Jan! This processing flow also works pretty well for IDS Stream C data in Geolitix. The dewow is a key step!
@StefanBurns3 жыл бұрын
The Geolitix platform is clearly very powerful! Thank you for demonstrating some of the new features
@gprinvestigation27254 жыл бұрын
free soft ?
@ryanenorth4 жыл бұрын
I have a few comments on lag and latency corrections. The first correction should always be a lag correction that is a distance based correction. The lag correction is based on the distance between the center of the GPS (or more correctly GNSS). The latency correction is a time based correction that corrects for the time difference between the GNSS receiver determining a location and the GPR saving that position with the GPR data. There really isn't an advantage of the GNSS receiver outputting positions faster than 1 Hz since the satellites are only sending data out at 1 Hz. Any output rate faster than 1 Hz is an extrapolation where the receiver might be from previous data. There is value in higher output rates if the GNSS system also includes a high quality inertial navigation system, but those quite often cost more than the GNSS receiver.