3 жыл бұрын
3 жыл бұрын
Пікірлер
@poetryMaybe 7 күн бұрын
Very nice
@lifethletics 18 күн бұрын
Très utile merci ☺️
@lucac682 2 ай бұрын
Hello, in item 2 when it says "justification of any deviation from protocol", if they don't say anything about deviations from protocol in the review, what i should do? I should check the box or not? And I have the same question also for item 4, when it says "Justified publication restrictions", if the review says that there are no language restrictions, or no restrictions at all, or just doesn't adresses the problem (it doesn't says anything about restrictions), what should I do? Check the box or not? Thank you and thank you for this video!
@nccmt 2 ай бұрын
Hello, thank you for your question. If these issues are not directly addressed by the authors, you can use your judgement to decide whether you feel the authors have adhered to the protocol. Similarly, you can judge whether or not the authors were inclusive of languages. Oftentimes, if authors were inclusive beyond English, this will be explicitly stated.
@lucac682 2 ай бұрын
@@nccmt Thank you a lot for your answer you are my saviour! But there is still a thing that I don't understand (Item 2), because, if they say "we did deviated from the protocol and that's because blah blah blah..." ok, that's obvious, I'll check the box, while if they say "we did deviated from the protocol." (without any justification) I won't check the box. But if instead they state "we totally adhered to the protocol", or, I feel that the authors have adhered to the protocol (so in the review they don't state "we totally adhered to the protocol" but I think they actually adhered to it), in this two cases, I'll check the box? Thank you again!
@nccmt 2 ай бұрын
@@lucac682 Yes, in those two cases, you can check the box! Essentially, if there are no deviations from the protocol then there's no need to justify.
@lucac682 Ай бұрын
@@nccmt Thank you so much (in extreme delay) for your answers and the time you took to help me! You are a very kind and nice person hope you the best!
@yasminemellak6887 4 ай бұрын
Merci pour cette video!
@leiremartin6246 4 ай бұрын
Should I use ROBINS-I for case control studies?
@nccmt 4 ай бұрын
Hi Leire. As long as the case control study is evaluating an intervention, you can use the ROBINS-I tool.
@kaouelmeguenni4911 5 ай бұрын
Merci. Très pertinent et clairement expliqué
@befekadudemmissie4592 7 ай бұрын
Metuculously presentwd and simple to undertand Odds Ratio. Thank you🙏
@LA-hg1tx 8 ай бұрын
thank you very much, it made if very easy to understand and calculate
@tetianatkachuk3013 8 ай бұрын
thank youuuuuuuuuuuu
@MutGonyMut 9 ай бұрын
amazing fact to you doc
@MutGonyMut 9 ай бұрын
You make it clear mother
@BilalAsgher-n9q 9 ай бұрын
Added to send me lianl
@shaikshafi1284 10 ай бұрын
Excellent
@kalina1795 10 ай бұрын
Promo`SM 🤤
@pupsiuspupuliukas2394 11 ай бұрын
good explanation of ARR compared to RRR .....I bet the government uses one set when they want to prove they have done something effectively and the other set when they want to minimise what they have done something not so welll....like this the risk of getting infected by the coronavirus is reduced by 40% if you wear a mask....when in reality they used the RRR instead of the ARR...I bet for deaths they used ARR instead of RRR to show how good a job they were doing...ha ha...guess Twain wasn't wrong then....
@SamratDe-yq5go 11 ай бұрын
Hello NCCMT | CCNMO Owner, I saw your KZbin channel, you upload very nice videos on your channel. I have watched all the videos and noticed that all the videos are beautiful. But your channel has many problems. But the problem is that your videos are not reaching your target audience! Because, your channel does not have SEO! If you don't fix the problem, your video won't get video views organically because the KZbin algorithm works on keywords, but your channel doesn't have any keywords! These problems can be solved by SEO techniques. Every video will rank on KZbin if you do SEO perfectly. Doing SEO will help your video reach the right people and increase views. Remember, SEO is not a single task, it is multifaceted. If you want to do SEO on your channel, I can help. I am an SEO expert. Thank you, have a nice day
@deiftunggal1239 Жыл бұрын
great videos..thanks
@eliassadooghirad9125 Жыл бұрын
Hello It was just brilliant. Thank you so much.
@ernestdovemanmp5294 Жыл бұрын
Perfect
@kakhangchungpanmei8205 Жыл бұрын
I can proudly say that I have conquered SMD🤣
@oluchukwuokoye4981 Жыл бұрын
Hi greetings, I have some questions about this too. I am currently conducting a systematic review and plan to use this tool. Most of my studies are cross sectional and few case-control. Because of my research question I cannot use RCTs. The question I have is regards to withdrawals and dropouts, blinding and confounders. These questions don’t have an answer because of the type of study. The studies identify confounders and adjustments but doesn’t say the percentage, also the studies don’t mention blinding or withdrawals are they are cross-sectional. Does this make my studies weak? Because they are really good articles. This tool is the best I have seen CASP doesn’t have checklist for cross sectional studies
@nccmt Жыл бұрын
Thank you for reaching out! In this case, you may consider referring to the JBI suite of critical appraisal tools, as an alternative. This suite includes tools specific for assessing cross-sectional and case-control studies. jbi.global/critical-appraisal-tools. Please feel free to email us at [email protected] with any further questions.
@oluchukwuokoye4981 Жыл бұрын
@@nccmt thank you for your response 🙏
@omarjea Жыл бұрын
Hands down, this was the best video I've watched on understanding the logic and visualizing what AR, ARR, RR, and RRR. Kudos!!
@nccmt Жыл бұрын
Thank you! We are glad you found this video useful.
@faniemarcelin9241 Жыл бұрын
ya t il un video en francais?
@nccmt Жыл бұрын
Bonjour Fanie, merci pour votre commentaire. Oui, je vous invite à regarder la vidéo en français ici : kzbin.info/www/bejne/sGfKiGVjbKydqZI
@soniabeur Жыл бұрын
merci merci merci inffffffffffffrmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
@puneetnanda6632 Жыл бұрын
its tooo good
@brokenrecord3523 Жыл бұрын
So, Covid vaccines, masking, distancing, R/D? What's the OR?
@hakhaimo Жыл бұрын
This is gold, good for review... simple to understand
@randomness3235 Жыл бұрын
The CCCA did a much better job at explaining how people were bamboozled by this.
@ANOOPBAL Жыл бұрын
A 40% reduction , but still no effect! This is the problem of interpreting CI as a p value.
@phylosophersstoned43 Жыл бұрын
Thanks for this awesome video
@viviankim2677 Жыл бұрын
😊😊😊😊
@flgirl3123 Жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this video! It helped me analyze my articles so much easier and I was able to write a great analysis. Thank you!!
@ytcdi Жыл бұрын
And the 2023 Oscar goes to RRR !
@cheranjeevijayam8163 Жыл бұрын
wow.. so nicely explained.. thanks
@cheranjeevijayam8163 Жыл бұрын
Amazing explanation
@drabdinor Жыл бұрын
Excellent thanks
@jtflypegasus Жыл бұрын
Very good explanation!
@LoisBeecroft-xi4jy Жыл бұрын
Thank you great simplicity and clarity
@thales5999 Жыл бұрын
Great and georgious presenter.
@zangetsu949 Жыл бұрын
🙏🙏🙏👍🏽
@cyriaquedevulpillieres5057 Жыл бұрын
Bonjour, je n'ai pas compris comment calculer le DMS: pour le cas du calcul de l'efficacité de l'intervention sur des ados pour évaluer leur état mental, s'il est la soustraction d'un score sur 10 à un autre, le DMS peut être supérieur à 1? Pourquoi indiquer qu'il est entre 0 et 1 ? Merci d'avance, Cyriaque
@nccmt Жыл бұрын
Merci pour votre commentaire. Pour calculer le DMS, la différence moyenne est divisée par l'écart type. Il est possible que le DMS soit supérieur à 1, ce qui indiquerait un effet très important.
@KearaDelacy1 Жыл бұрын
Thankyou so much <3 this video has really helped make things clear
@TheHadesShade Жыл бұрын
so just 45% above and under the mean is the confidence interval?
@nccmt Жыл бұрын
Thanks for reaching out. In the first example, the confidence interval ranges from 30% above to 30% below the relative risk. In the second example, the confidence interval ranges from 50% above to 50% below the relative risk.
@sosac6646 2 жыл бұрын
This was honestly really good. Using the same example for all the risk ratios was so helpful. Seeing how it compares.
@andydoe8184 2 жыл бұрын
anda perlu menjelaskan kandungan
@wildfirekunal 2 жыл бұрын
These videos are great. Thank you!
@Simi.g 2 жыл бұрын
Really appreciate the way you explained it.
@patriciavelardedelgado7455 2 жыл бұрын
thank you
@greggphelps7643 2 жыл бұрын
Why are all the vaccinated spreading stds???
@michelndeugue9881 2 жыл бұрын
Really enriching. Thanks