Just as people grew numb to caring whether a DJ auto synced a mix, so to will people not care whether a human or AI created a 3m track.

Leaving things to politicians... probably not the smartest ideea>?

If younger people are genuinely satisfied with consuming cheap low quality AI generated content, that's their business - whether that is music or videos or games or written articles or news etc. If people are content to live their lives in a generic AI consumption world, it remains to be seen what that does to our society. It's like a "McDonalds-ifcation" of society. I have a feeling eventually there will be a backlash against this kind of cheap mass market low quality AI generated content world, where people will get bored of it and seek out authentic real experiences with real people and real artists (and real writers and real content creators etc.). Cheap low quality generic mass market experiences have been around for a long time: in fast food, elevator muzak, ear buds, fast fashion clothes & shoes, etc. When you're young and you don't have much money but you have a lot of free time, then cheap generic mass market experiences are more appealing. As you get a little older, you start to have more money and resources at your disposal and less free time, so your taste & expectations go up dramatically, and you seek out more authentic and immersive experiences. Every market has tiers: low market, mid market, high market, luxury market. Perhaps cheap generic mass market AI experiences satisfy more of the low market tier, but then as taste & expectations rise the real authentic immersive experiences are needed to satisfy the mid market and up?

if spotify are using AI to make songs in styles to take 100% of the revenue... why wouldn't people go on the AI music producer and make their own songs and playlists without spotify? download to their computer directly?

KZbin and other social media are planning to replace content creators with A.I "creators" WHY? so social media companies won't have to pay earnings to ACTUAL content creators.

From a philosophical standpoint i dont believe AI is stealing anything, its just transistors trained on other music just like our brains neurons are trained and inspired by other peoples muisc.

Yes!!! it's starting to unfortunately :( It will get to a point that you can put a brief description of what you want a song to be into the program and press a button and it writes, sings, generates melodies that fit, mixes and masters the song for you. Good bye singers (you've tested the AI singer with great results) Good bye mix engineers Good bye master engineers AI can scan all the songs and create a melody that's not being used. It use to be that good artists/producers only had access to acapellas and stems. But now AI can do a good job of extracting vocals out of a song which now every man and his dog can get anything for remixing which could be good as there's good bedroom producers out there BUT there's alot of bad ones too so you'll get way more dogy songs. We don't need to pump out songs all the time. Quality over quantity!!! Conclusion: AI can be good but the bad heavily HEAVILY outweighs the good.

Good to see you active on KZbin again Jon

I think 99% of music today is made on a computer and that just wasn’t the case in the 80s and 90s lots of musicians recording themselves to tape on 24 tracks rather than just copy and pasting chorus and versus Everyone copying each other style because they watch KZbin tutorials on how they do it rather than being an original artist You’ve only got to look at the charts there are no big superstars anymore Just a small handful Gone are the Platinum selling albums Real music doesn’t start at 120 beats a minute and finish at 120 beats a minute It deviates The DAW is the reason

How about an update? At least in your notes.

You can make 100% computer-made music but vocals are the human touch, the soul of a song. This is great for mockups though

How do you Compare it to audimee?

Great.

The Please Subscribe got a hearty chuckle out of me.

this is amazing, thanks for showing us this!!!

Billie Eilish (with her brother Finneas), St Vincent have done exquisite works last year with very particular sounds. Very creative, experimental. So it's not quite fair to make those statements for every mainstream artist.

I’m old school. I came up producing vocals before we had DAWs or Autotune apps. I’ve made bad singers sound good (in context of the song they were singing). And, I could totally make this work as a lead vocal in certain songs and you’d never know it wasn’t a real person. Technology is getting ridiculously good and I’m here for it.

Someone who started a side project called "Against the A.I." is now going all-in on AI. You can’t make this stuff up. Honestly, this tool will make it even harder to be successful with music.

Vocals are my bottleneck too and I have been using SynthV since it was launched. Considering AceStudio as well because it seems a little easier . Jon have your tried it with the ACE Bridge plugin in Logic Pro?

can't afford it but might have to get it

What speakers are they? Black installed in the wall? Dont you have those Eve Audio SC 3012?

Well... As a bedroom music producer I've found it cool. As an average session singer I would probably find it awful for my income... Someone vin someone lose... It's a part of the game called Life. It may looks unfair, but who said the life must be fair?

I believe I can Master a song better then u 😂

No work for singers and then no work for producers. It will be not like the changes in past.

What is the isolation material that is used on railroad tracks that you used in the soffits for the ATC speakers you installed?

Synthesizer V is miles better. Ace is just a ripoff.

The demo is not free, you have to pay to try the program, not impressed...

Eh, I'm not sure I'm too big of a fan of AI singers. The only exception is, well, not even AI: just voicebanks, which are pre-recorded vowels and consonants, which you have to tune yourself. Still, I personally find it easier and more fulfilling to sing myself.

Let’s make more generic music that sounds exactly the same. Great…

In den meisten Videos zu ACE Studio klang die meisten Stimme immer wie ein Emotionsloser Singer, den man mit Autotune aufgewertet hat, für Demos oder Background in Ordnung. Immerhin realistischer als Vocaloid. Synthesizer V finde ich klanglich am realistischsten und man kann es auch für die Hauptstimme einsetzen. Es könnte allerdings daran liegen, dass ich noch kein Video gesehen habe das die Möglichkeit von ACE Studio ausschöpft. Bin gespannt auf Synthesizer V 2 was dieses Jahr erscheint.

Mediocrity's next toy.

This is terrible. Music is meant to be collaborative and self evolving. There are so many singers who would jump at the opportunity to sing on a producer’s song. Just use them. Also vocal classes a super accessible.

When Udio and Suno make clear stems available for each track, it's game over.

AI will kill music.... sadly

how gross. anti-human and anti-art.

So yamaha vocaloid

There are already men paying subscriptions to AI models on Onlyfans and other platforms. The steady decline of devaluing live people undoubtedly will impact singers, musicians, etc. This is the result of the first music file that was sent for free and no one really cared.

For me, AI vocals are bull shit ,I see no reason to admire him

Like Jon mentions, it also seems really nice for prototyping vocals and then you could show a singer your song with AI vocals and ask if they want to sing on it, or it can be used to show a singer generally how you want them to sing, or you could use it to show a demo song to a label to better show them the potential of the song to get them to hire you a good singer, or to figure out what type of voice you want on a song before trying to pick an actual singer.

It also easily doubles vocals and could be used for backing harmonies as well. It is an amazing program.

Song recommendation: Rusty Android Pocha

Publishing deals

hate it. there's nothing good on this. the future of music is doomed..

Weird and low quality 😒 insane test yeah

Yes the AI is definitely insane. I'm just wondering about the legal ramifications of releasing songs sung by AI voices though....Who will be credited as the singer of the song if it's an AI voice? And what about royalties due to singers? Will those be gobbled up by AI too? Food for thought!

I have the same. Making ghost tracks from Beatport top 10 and my style also :D This is interesting that people want to take the same song as another producer made

Thats so realistic btw.😮

This actually pathetic

Come on, analyse 50’s, 60’s, 70’s or 80’s stuff and you gonna make a huge discovery that this process didn’t start yesterday. Those 50’s rock n roll things sound almost identical, Beatles wannabes copies from 60’s too, same disco/funk stuff of 80’s. Those people use more limited equipment and those things sounds similar. Maybe only fact is that nowadays you can discover music to the point of exhaustion and there are no limits to it

Bro, AI is so corny. Just like u dawg