Stringer is a beast. Love all of his talks.

Yes very nice❤❤❤❤ 0:17

Thankyou ❤

Miss jurgaiyte on top 💯💯💯💯

43:55 climate:(

Great things coming!! Excited to see even more GenSoc growth this year!! 🚀✨

Another big confusion with human evolution, is your failure to separate pre-flood 5700-to-4502bc (NOT from 570,000-to-45,020ya), findings from post-flood findings of 4502bc, and (NOT from 45,020ya). This is why your confusing hominins with and as human ancestors. They just shared the same environmental geographic habitats, ate plants and and animals from these same habitats, and shared common ancestry from perfect human ADAMITES of 6764-to-4502bc, (NOT from 6,764,000-to- 45,020ya). These are the ONLY reasons for genetic similarity.

Will you archaeologists and geneticists stop referring to Neanderthal, Denisovan, Erectus, Habilis hominins as human ancestors. They only branched off 5700-to-4502bc, (NOT from 5,700,00-to-45,020ya.) from the ADAMITE lineage, just as WE did, but from the YAREDIY peoples. But ALL people today originate from the family of NOAH. Which includes four female lineages, and twenty five paternal branches. I am most certain that geneticist have already found this to be a fact.

Now, in evolution, human brains are SCHRINKING. You see it in the USA. No joke.

Seems unlikely that homosapiens back then would have seen neanderthals and denisovans as anything other than members of their own species. Maybe thinking of them as different races or "nationalities" (if they had such concepts), perhaps, but humans nonetheless. Also, I doubt there would have been as much sex going on if we viewed them as unintelligent -- or, alternatively, if they viewed us as so.

Could I suggest in the kindest terms to the Lady interviewer- Please raise your voice!

Wonderfull presentation. Im from Indonesia and working at Sangiran Museum which were Homo erectus (Sangiran 17) found in Sangiran Site

Early stage God turned a bug inside out and said first gets most

Couldn’t you possibly prepare to go on KZbin by making sure all your technical issues are resolved before beginning? The opening to this video was one of the most unprofessional presentations I’ve ever seeen from an established institution. Ridiculous.

Why does everyone try to sugarcoat ancient interbreeding? Do you think that there was a lovey-dovey world until around 5000 years ago? My bet is it was a violent takeover by Sapiens where they killed the male Neanderthals and raped and subjugated the females. Just as they did to each other when settled in the Levant and still do in war torn areas today. Nothing to be proud of mind you, just likely the reality of it.

Why don't they show the Denisovans with epicanthic folds on the eyes? Or even the Neanderthals?

Me encanta cómo la charlatanería "científica" utiliza puras hipótesis (como la "evolución") como si fueran cosas dadas y ciertas !! El título del video es un ejemplo. Demasiada política, ideología y agendas borrosas y poca ciencia en general en casi todas las disciplinas. Y muchas mentiras.

Such rapid evolution must mean isolation then interbreeding of populations. The larger frontal cortex must have being the winner over the more robust physicality and adaptation to environment of the Neanderthal

It’s it the rule now to refer to the “Chinese” Tibetan Plateau

Very impressed by the depth of the professor's knowledge. Very clear and convincing answers.

Neanderthals WERE human as their DNA sequence were 99.84% identical to ours. Human to human, were are 99.90% identical to each other. If we subtracted the thousands of years of DNA mutation load since we co-existed with them, we would have been 99.90% identical back then. What caused the physical differences? Gene expression would be the explanation. It is the overlying epigenome over the DNA sequences of every gene adjusting its methylation-chemical tags making physical trait differences. This action is called EPIGENETICS. Evolutionary proponents have always have ASSUMED evolving DNA mutations with this epigenetic-derived adaptations. This is now a false precept as many other precepts have been exposed since 2000. So how does the evolutionists say some people have 4% of the Neanderthal DNA and others have none when there is just an 00.06% difference? They are counting gene expression. Gene expression modifications do not involve DNA being changed. Think of it this way. Think of the caterpillar turning into a butterfly. Does its DNA sequence become different as it does it? No. It is epigenetics as its genes get turned on and off or up and down making the wings to form, the six legs of the insect, the antennae, the compound eyes. So keeping this in mind of the capability epigenetics with the caterpillar, could this biological system give the new beaks to the Darwin Finch? Make lizard foot pads adjust in the sizes or do an elongation of its gut when switching from an insect diet to a plant one? How about cave fish's offspring have non-eye development after they leave the outside streams into the caves? How about high-altitude breathing? Or all of the stickleback and cinclid fish adaptations? It is yep, yep, yep, yep and yep! It is all epigenome-derived adaptations without the ASSUMED evolving of any DNA mutations. It's all merely without the butterfly metamorphosis but is by epigenetics. Evolution is not happening hands down, folks! The logistics of epigenetic-derived adaptations shows we are from an intelligent design, not by the Godless-spinned one of 'evolution'. Who is the intelligent designer? Jesus Christ beyond doubt! This means the free gift of eternal forever-life thru your faith in His blood atonement for your sins...past, present, and future...is for YOU...and believe in His resurrection and this precious free gift is yours forever! The theory of evolution gives you nothing. Do not believe in this fatalistic scam. It is actually disguised humanism with selfish political science benefits to those who push it.

To 😮t? G😢gv

A follow-up to a previous comment I made: Regarding Prof. Stringer's interpretation at ~ 23:00 at which he states Neanderthals and today's populations are not the same species - Our hard (osseous) morphology may differ from Neanderthals, but what about the soft tissue? Today we have very different morphological populations based on height, weight, and soft tissue appearance, as well as different disease problems. Today we have prognathous populations, and flat-faced populations. Some people with big brow ridges and thick skulls, and others that are more gracile. Some populations are very tall (e.g., East Africa), and others very short (e.g., African Pygmies, some East Asian peoples). Yet, today we are still the same species, regardless of osseous morphology. So why not consider Neanderthals and the surviving H. sapiens as the same species? Clearly, morphology is an adaptation to local/regional ecological conditions with some possible drift, but it is not a golden standard for determining speciation.

If all Human's today are from a group who left Africa 60,000 years ago ... what the heck happened to those other species who stayed behind????

Thank you so very much for this!

This girl was a bad choice for a moderator... I am an Indian and used to her accent and I feel she is annoying... Why is she so inaudible?

I am layman and I understood it !!!

One species cannot evolve into another. Not even plausiible.

We (modern humans) banded together in tribes, developed better weapons and simply wiped out everyone else. We were natural and ruthless conquerors.

Both climate change and magnetic poles changes are events that the Neanderthals successfully went through multiple times in their 400,000+ years. No reason for the last one 40,000 years ago to any different. I am surprised such speculation even make it passed Journal reviews. I guess when the politics is "right" anything goes, and probably feeding on to the public press.

Why did you delete the comment about Michael Cremo, and the man that they found under a rock in the United states that was 300 million years old? It's documented in academic papers, and scientific journals. I sent that to help you guys, why do you want to help them hide it?

I have a question. Does every science have a proverbial "junk drawer" that they throw all of the ooparts into, and then just ignore, or is that something unique to Archaeology? What is the most anomalous odd ball thing that geneticists have found so far? Is it being ignored? Why?

Also, you guys need to DNA test more animals, you know why? Because 30 million years ago Monkeys from Africa Made it to South America, the DNA tests prove this, but they absolutely did not get their on their own. Did you know that they say they accidentally drifted there on debris? That is physically impossible. They need water, and food with water in it (like fruit) to live. They would die in just 2 days without it. You know how long it takes to cross the Atlantic by Canoe? 24 days. So not only did someone bring them there, they took care of them for almost a month, on the way. They say that this impossible accident happened with not just one species of Monkey, but multiple species. Please use your gigantic brain to fix science, because these people have no logic. The same thing happened with sweet potatoes, and Chickens, by the way. The sweet potatoes made it from Peru to the pacific islands, 800k years ago, and Potatoes dont float. Moche' pottery has chickens on it, and that was way before Columbus. Chickens are from Europe, and they are more fragile than a Monkey. They do not fly, and they do not swim. I have a screen shot of a pre-columbian Nazca pot with a shoebill on it too, and those only ever lived in Africa. If you want the screen shots, article links, or any thing else, let me know.

hey! just wanted to reach out and let you know your discord link is expired, when you create a link for your discord to post on public places make sure to remember to modify the expiration date of the link, the default is 7 days before a link expires, which is dumb lol, but that's just how discord does it. anyway, great channel, hmu when you get a new discord invite and i'd love to join and send you a link to a science discord community i'm building to help get channels like yours in touch with a science based audience, hope you're well!!!

The only real truth is this: There's a team HIGHER DIMENSIONAL ASTRO BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERS THAT ARE IN CHARGE AND RESPONSIBLE TO CREATE THE PHYSICAL BIOLOGICAL HUMANOID BODIES WITH DNA CODEX FOR INTELLIGENT METAPHYSICAL LIGHT BEINGS SO THEY CAN INCARNATE INTO THIS PHYSICAL BIOLOGICAL HUMANOID BODIES AND BE ABLE TO EXPERIENCE PHYSICAL MATTER LIFE TIMES WITH THE PURPOSE OF THEIR SPIRITUAL CONSCIOUS EVOLUTION THROUGH MANY LIFETIMES AS NEEDED THATS WHY THERE'S A MISSING LINK IN THE EVOLUTION DARWYNIAN THEORY, BUT YOU HUMANS ARE STILL LOCKED IN YOUR PHYSICAL REALITY ,AND THAT'S WHY YOU ARE UNABLE TO FIND THIS COSMIC REAL TRUTH ! THIS COSMIC HIGHER KNOWLEDGE IS IN ANCIENT MEXICO WITH THE HIGHER DIMENSIONAL GOLDEN LIGHT MASTER OF COSMIC KNOWLEDGE KNOWN AS QUETZALCOALT IN THE ANCIENT LOST BOOK OF THE SUPERHUMAN IN THE 5TH DIMENSION !

how many cubic centimeters was Homo Longis brain volume

the issues are .. this is all BULL.. humans have been alive 15,000 years by dna.. everything else died off 50,000 100,000 years ago

Perhaps we alone survived not because our bones changed, but because our brains did. I am not a scientist. I have read that something like 37% of Neanderthal skulls exhibited brain trauma. Today, on rare occasions, individuals with brain trauma suddenly develop acquired savant syndrome, where they have an epiphany of some kind. If this has been happening to early homo sapiens and not other species, then perhaps something in our brains allowed us to have sudden quantum leaps of intelligence where an individual started cave painting or using an atlatl. The innovation would spread to the group and then other groups. The study of acquired savant syndrome only goes back a couple hundred years, so I do not know how it can be substantiated two hundred millennia in the past. I know its effects exist today and may have influenced our past.

Why are we the only ones left? Well, someone had to go extinct last.

Out of Africa does not work for me

I'll watch just about any lecture by Dr Stringer I can find. His life experience and observations of the "evolution of evolution" add credibility to his observations so clearly stared. The last 20-30 years have been exciting times in this discipline.

Been following this (the human) story for over fifty years and read about some of the earlier research on the origins of species. The one constant in this story is it is always changing as new fossils turn up. Sometimes (in the past) scientists have come to conclusions by the discovery of a single tooth and I note the Denisiven fossil record is very small (from a finger bone they got different DNA to Neanderthals). Maybe the eventual conclusions, if there is going to be one, will be quite different from what we believe today. It might even be more human species and the origins might have been from Asia or Europe

Thank you Prof. Stringer. For anyone reading this post I'm currently researching Neandertal ancestry in sub-Saharan populations, and attempting to determine if all indigenous sub-Saharans have Neandertal genes. If anyone can assist in clarifying this topic, or suggest academic papers/online resources I would be much appreciative. Thank you.

So interesting.....DNA evidence in sediment!! Great video.

Thank you for advising being careful inference based on a small section of skull! I very much liked your video ! I have felt for a long time that there was a lot of diversity in ancient human species! I've guessed that different different natural disasters and climate changes have prevented that many outliers and when they did were likely to have those populations decimated!

A talk that probably won't age well... interesting tho.

More of this please

Interesting and somewhat spoiled by painfully shy moderator. Can’t hear what she is saying. Nonetheless , a very good presentation and as an academic criminologist I am very focused and interested on variances in demographics, innate traits and socialisation differences between modern African , European and Chinese, and SE Asian populations. For instance many studies clearly demonstrate differences (bell curves) in IQ, propensity for violence, propensity to conform, spatial awareness, innovation, dexterity, tolerance to cold, etc. This is not addressed. Issues such as Vitamin D，diet, daylight hours, adaption to harsh conditions + recent evolution between races not addressed - I guess a mine field in this day and age where positive discrimination tends to prove that some races need a helping hand to counter natural selection, fitness, success. Also, as someone who was asymptomatic to Covid I wonder why some people died and whether this would be a modern day reason (medical intervention exempted) for natural selection and might be a reason for Neanderthal extinction - like flu on North American populations. Also things like Chinese cannot tolerate alcohol and Africans have propensity to sickle cell anemia Does this not suggest everyone outside Africa is a hybrid and like mongrel dogs better adapted, more successful and longer living. Africa does seem to fall behind the rest of the world despite high populations and abundance of resources !!! Too controversial?

We can't have children with Bushmen and they're much more closer to humans then Neanderthals!

Thank you for sharing this wonderful talk.