Thank you for this video. i just heard about this CTA today. could you please post updates on this as you receive the updates.

Thanks for sharing such valuable information! I need some advice: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). How can I transfer them to Binance?

nice

Hello Sir, , I'm a huge fan of your KZbin channel Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC and have been following your videos for the last few months. You consistently deliver top-notch content, and your passion and effort shine through in every video. I see incredible potential for you to reach an even wider audience with a solid KZbin strategy. I'd love to schedule a short meeting to discuss how I can help you grow your channel faster. This isn't a sales call, but rather an opportunity to share ideas and offer assistance. Thanks for your time and for creating such amazing content. Keep up the fantastic work! We can find a convenient time to chat. Let me know if you're interested.

Osha is all bull shit wolf wast llc violated plenty of laws as far as health and safty and osha walked away from the inspection and told me that if your a whistle blower you have to prove more then the POS company and they won't do a investigation WE THE EMPLOYEES PAY THE TAXS DOLLARS FOR ALL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO RECEIVE A GOD DAM CHECK ANT THEY DONT WORK FOR US THEY ARE FOR THE EMPLOYER

Hi are you in NY?

On my previous credit reports on the first page it showed my credit history of being approximately 27 years, now right there it says 9 years. Is my credit history changing from 27 years (first student loan) to 9 years (first credit card) a sign that my Borrowers Defense has been approved? A manager said the 1st they have to do is wipe your credit report clean if there was fraud. However, I can still click on my student loans. Maybe it's going through the process????

is this the law that was passed to Get Trump? Showing Proof doesn’t matter.

This guy knows his stuff! You are fighting the good fight for tax exemptions for non-profits! You are my cousin Philip K. Grommet!

Great content

I was analyzing your youtube channel Bond, Schoeneck & king ... and are you struggling with subscribers and videos views for monetization. I can help you grow your YT channel. We are offering a full monetization /marketing/promotion video SEO service. I am Md. Uzzal hossain has been working as a full KZbin monetization service provider since 2019. Al ready I completed 500+ jobs from our Agency 100% I can guarantee to improve subscriber and video views with my experience.

This was very helpful information, thank you for sharing.

I need help in regards to my 207C package, especially from where it comes from it come please I need help and I want to sue my attorney that is dealing with this

Promo SM 😌

I need privacy. Its essential and necessary for me to grow! How I became an exploited person is something I need to know, too! The average American can not withstand constant violations of privacy or not having boundaries meant to form some sort of privacy so they can feel psychologically safe! I can't take it.

I know you’re not in Utah and in NYC but, I have some pay stubs that are not showing or paying A. What I’m worth which I know is a in house thing but, I’m getting paid 1-5 hrs of my 17-20 of overtime.. idk what to do…

Thanks @Bond, Schoeneck & King PLLC for posting this video about affirmative action / supreme court. Here are the viewpoints expressed by Supreme Court justices regarding affirmative action. 1) This case is about a group called Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) who sued Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (UNC). They said that these schools were not fair in their admissions process because they were using race as a factor, which they believed was against the law. The law they referred to is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment*. 2) The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. The SFFA believed that by considering race in admissions, Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally. 3) The Court looked at the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and how it has been used in the past. They also looked at how other cases involving race and college admissions were handled. They found that while diversity in a student body can be a good thing, it must be handled in a way that treats all applicants fairly and equally. 4) The Court also looked at the idea of "strict scrutiny*". This is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional. 5) The Court found that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC did not pass strict scrutiny. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear or specific enough, and it resulted in fewer admissions for certain racial groups. They also said that the schools' use of race in admissions seemed to stereotype certain racial groups, which is not allowed. 6) The Court also said that the schools' admissions systems did not have a clear end point. This means that there was no clear plan for when the schools would stop using race as a factor in admissions. This was another reason why the Court said the schools' admissions systems were not fair. 7) The Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear, specific, or fair enough to be allowed. 8) However, the Court also said that schools can consider how race has affected an applicant's life. They can look at how an applicant's experiences with their race have shaped them and what they can bring to the school because of those experiences. 9) In the end, the Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the law. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not allowed because it was not clear, specific, or fair enough. 10) So, the Court decided that the SFFA was right. They said that Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally in their admissions process, which is against the law. They said that the schools needed to change their admissions systems to be fair to all applicants, no matter their race. *The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. *Strict scrutiny is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional.

Excited to learn more about these forfeitures.

Wtf? You didn't state any of the exceptions

Subbed, I loved it. Need more views? -> 🄿🅁🄾🄼🄾🅂🄼!!

Wait wait, so the issue about the "full day" increments is still unclear. I feel that my office is misinterpreting the "increments". @ they will not pay more than 4 hours per shift missed. If a person works a normal 8 hour shift and is only being paid for four. . . See where I'm going here? Most of us would go into work sick to get a full days pay rather than calling in sick to receive half a days pay. This policy is no benefit to us. However, if my office would realize that we would need to use 2, 4 hour "increments " then PSL would truly be beneficial. It is my sincere hope that this area of wording would be changed soon so that companies understand that a 4 hour "increment " is not a "cap". Can you provide any current advice on how to get HR to understand this?

Nice concise summary here! Sustainable packaging is a big part of the regs! Listen to our podcast to keep tabs on all things sustainable cannabis packaging in New York!

What I'm absolutely confused about is why there is a cap of 4 hours per day of sick time that we can use. Most of us work an 8 or 10 hour shift. That money is missed come payday. How is that helpful? In other words, our company is saying that we cannot under any circumstances, use more than 4 hours.

Ms. Duby's presentation was not very clear and hard to follow and understand for a lay person. Don't just take information from the legislation, explain it at a basic level so non-lawyers understand what it means.

ᎮᏒᎧᎷᎧᏕᎷ

So an employer is NOT required to post or provide PSL info to their employees but employees are required to give notice? What if the employee didn't know there was even a PSL policy because they were never informed by the employer? yet the employee is being punished or denied PSL because they didn't follow protocol

Homeschool your children

These laws are clearly unconstitutional and will be overturned very soon in the courts. The Supreme Court ruling has stated that you cannot invent sensitive places.

Do you have a practice in Utah?

Bru this is my schools other chanle

😡 p̳r̳o̳m̳o̳s̳m̳

What happens to the privacy of Private Citizens ? How about more transparency of Public Servants ? So track them if you wish to track anyone

doesnt matter....your company will enforce it anyway

Pushing this nwo agenda

Beginner Reporter: why test the unvaccinated? Fraud fauci: well, so we know if they are infected. Beginner Reporter: why is that important to you? Fraud fauci: I don't know. Beginner Reporter: is it because you think the vaccine is fake? Fraud fauci: oh goodness no Beginner Reporter: what other reason could there be? Fraud fauci: I don't know Beginner Reporter: why not test the vaccinated? Fraud fauci: I don't know. Beginner Reporter: is it because you fear the positive results? Fraud fauci: oh goodness no. Beginner Reporter: what other reason could there be? Fraud fauci: I don't know

Per OSHA I can request the SDS on chemicals in the workplace.

We all should protest against OSHA on the Vaccine mandate.

Guess I'll quit my job. I'll be leaving the country until all of this blows over.

🖕🏼there’s your jab mandate osha

Not happening

It's been over 500 years of colonization and their foreign virus genocides against us trying to wipe us out and We need special protections

Thank you very very much Nihla and Andrew! You guys were super helpful with presenting this information, and helping me understand the employers point of view!

What’s the latest news on forced jab???

Everyone, contact OSHA and ask for the given birth names of those who are attempting to commit crimes against humanity. We need to contact them and ask for proof of isolation of their covid 19 from sick people. We can charge them with perjury as publuc servants shall not cause harm onto men and wonen.

I hope the impeachment will go through so WE can toss all of this VIRUS junk in the GABAGE. I don't see how all of this got thus far it is totally against the constitution.

Didn't we win twice!!!!!! before

Seems like our government is turning to tyranny

Fick OSHA

There's no law.

Last I knew, anyone forcing something in someone else's body is rape. Maybe assault. But I promise mine will travel at a much higher velocity!