what

i am ur first view

Our bodies are very rational but our thoughts vary considerably in levels of rational .

LoL yes they are we all have irrational moments.

Reductio ad absurdum that's serious old

Good job you are getting better at reading💪

LOL. No the materialistic ontology is not based on presuppositions that we are taught in school and "just believe". It is based in logical axioms. Base brute facts such as 1+1=2 and reality exists independent of your personal belief and mind ( the world was not made because of you, you just live in it). Ontology as you have presented it is based on presuppositions that you "just believe". That the universe itself can somehow be defined as rational , living, or being. Just because our minds are a part of the universe doesn't mean that the greater universe can be described with the same ontology that we would use to describe a mind. Went you do that the meaning of mind and person is lost as the words no longer hold the utility of communicating a singular set concept and are now use to vaguely describe "the universe". This is why " The Critique of Pure Reason" by Immanuel Kant is mandatory reading for first year philosophy students. I would suggest picking up a copy.

I like the pursuit, but I think the presentation of the ideas could be improved. I'm referring to the writing quality in particular, but the ideas also seem half-baked.

Perceptions of realities sometimes vary substantially in accuracy , depth , fullness of alignment etc .

The greatest truths will fit together with great beauty . The greatest truths are greatly aligned with the greatest realities .

❤❤

The importance of philosophy in academia is paramount. Thanks for making this video.

Idk, philosophize this; Some Biblical knowledge: Just some helpful education; from what I understand after reading the Torah and Bible..... There is only one Twin Flame and that is the Adam reincarnate and the Eve reincarnate everytime they reincarnate on earth. Read Obadiah thru Malachi to understand the story. If he fails his test as he did in Malachi 2:11; there is a significant possibility of a woman solely inheriting the earth as Prophecized in Micah 4:8. Look at the Tarot cards from the Rider Waite Deck, and the Bible. Empress card in Rev 12 describes the 12 stars in her crown, that is symbolic of the 12 Tribes of Israel. The High Priestess has the sun and moon under her feet like in Rev 12:1. When the Empress reads the Torah she becomes the High Priestess [see Torah in her arms] ready for her calling as the Rev 12 Woman once completed is Micah 4:8; The Daughter of G-d. Tarot was created for and by the Jews; King Solomon had the magicians [remember Solomon commanded the Demons WITH G-DS PERMISSION!!!!!] develop a tool for him to find his Eve [the Proverbs 31 Woman] as he knew he was the reincarnate of Adam. Further, the Twin Flame or the star is reserved for ISRAEL!! Isaiah 10:17 (KJV) And the light of Israel shall be for a fire, and his Holy One for a flame: and it shall burn and devour his thorns and his briers in one day; Micah 4:8 And thou o tower of the flock the strong hold of the Daughter of Zion unto thee shall it come EVEN THE FIRST DOMINION the kingdom shall come to the Daughter of Jerusalem. Delete this and watch ur hair fall out! Signed, Micah 4:8

Is this similar to Sam Harris' ponderings when he told us to look at our hand, not what it is made up of but for what it is without preconceived notions?

"promo sm" 🙏

Interesting perspective. So, does this mean that the absolute truth can slowly be uncovered by analysing reality till only the things that hold true everywhere and eternally are left? I liken the “Absolute Truth” to an Axiom in mathematics: It’s the fundamental, the atom of knowledge. Thanks for the vid.

Good content

.........A reflection of the intricate dance between the finite and the infinite, the known and the unknown !

Underrated

first

This is the kind of stuff I think about on shrooms.

🧐 ( ͡ ͜ʖ ͡ ) This reminds me of a little theory I wrote regarding the strangely unresolved phenomenon regarding quantum entanglement: In quantum entanglement, or what Einstein called "spooky action at a distance", the spin of one particle effects the other immediately no matter the distance. Despite Einstein's equations that say that no information can travel faster than the speed of light. Well, it's a problem still being debated. But does it really defy anything? Could it be where perception comes in?Could it simply be that this "spooky action" might seems instantaneous to us but is actually just communication done in a higher dimension? Although we're three-dimensional beings, we're actually moving in all the higher dimensions as well. One clever example of this would be this: a flatlander is moving on a two-dimensional strip, now let's make a twist and connect the ends, making a möbius strip. Now, notice that not only does our fellow flatlander have motion in the third dimension, but he also travels to both the front and back of the strip (for the flatlander it's like he "teleported" instantaneously from front to back).

Colors dont actually exist. Colors are constructed in the brain. Subjectively, there is no way to tell whether my blue is actually blue to you, who knows, maybe what I call blue looks red to you. Technically speaking, we can never perceive fundamental reality (or the truth as you like to call it), however, we can deduce that it does exist. The color blue is a real and fundamental phenomenon within our universe because it does exist (ie we can detect it with scientific instruments, and sense it with our eyes), but the fundamental experience of true blue is filtered by the limitations of our biology. We can never know what true blue actually looks like, because we can only experience true reality at a limited and filtered way. Well, thats ny two cents anyway.

Do you have a doctorate?

I like to think that dimensions are the geometry of infinity, it helps me wrap my mind of different ideas in set theory (sucklike the prefatory idea of different sizes of infinity). Now, thinking of dimensions as levels of clarity, I start to see how one might coin the term "absolute infinity". Unlike other infinities which are in a sense accessible (as they are circumscribed by bigger infinities, just like dimensions); truth, can be thought of as an absolute infinity. An ultimate, inaccessible, ensemble. I share your holistic view of things :) I wonder why this channel gets so little views, it's very interesting and with decent visuals. One thing I would say is it sounds a bit "one-breath", some pauses could give a healthier dynamic.

Classic!

Is this about ontological or dialectical writing? Do you imply they're the same thing?

The experience aimed at is pure consciousness. Not "pure thought." Which doesn't exist. To recognize a thought means you're conscious. Thoughts aren't conscious. They're a Content of consciousness.

Just a nitpick, but the view that thoughts occur spontaneously is not just a Buddhist view, but a view in Hinduism, Jainism, and many other faiths as well. So you would have been better off referring to Dharmic philosophies here. But otherwise, a good subject to touch upon!

This is a good video and I plan to watch your others. Was the voiceover done by a human voice or an AI?

Your cadence when speaking makes it harder to understand you, however your talking about some awesome topics that I don't see many people delving into. I'm curious if you have explored when one settles in to perceive the instances popping in and out, cast ones "gaze" outward and observe the dotting of other points which form the "definition" of this point, look at the constellation of those points and see how those constellations shift as you traverse from the perspective of one point to the perspective of an other in order to grasp the geometry of the associative web formed by our experience?

Interesting concept I like the visuals, but q few tips. Iv built a channel b dore that go a good 10,000 followers. Your thoughts sound disjointed. It's jaunting in the begining. Take notes. Get a really good open. Done takes as many times as it takes to not sound jumbled up.

Take the meds bro.

Come on let's use our minds people. 3d is a cube, sphere, etc. (length, width, depth) 2d is a flat plane (length, width) 1d is a line (length) 0d is a DOT (SINGULARITY)

Zero dimension is a singularity. It is full potentiality. In it is our univers. You are that zero dimension wearing the univers as a cloak. And you can't belive your work. Other you looking at you.❤

There are no "dimensions". Its just practicle to measure space in three axis.

bro what drugs are you on, you said like 2 logically coherent things in this entire video.

Yeah, as soon as i saw the red door with the pentagram 3 seconds into the video, i knew whoever made this isn't all there.😂

Like existants of somthing with no dimensions right!! Y ar u complicating it!

There are no such things as dimensions, dimensions are a construct made by man to understand the world around him. Nothing more.

Gobble y goo.

You are correct as you conclude at the end of this video that a system of individual observers knowing that individualized speciation that is known to the network of individuals that provide the definition of that complexity is inherently hinged upon the knowledge of the certain aspects of the "thing that any observer reasonably believes must be perceived as zero-dimensional and as no other amount of dimensions because we know enough about it to become ever more certain that a zero-dimension must be possible if the subsequent dimensions must have emerged from it to allow us to be capable of knowing information about it that must require its prior existence to have come to know." You are incorrect about a conclusion you made earlier in the video however. You say "it has to be a zero-dimensional" in order to both know that there is (at least) a first dimension that succeeds it in causal order and to know that there must be something out there telling you that such a thing must exist in order for you to be capable of observing the information that led you to conclude that it must be something outside of yourself that exists and that truly that must be something external to you if you're able to deduce it so specifically through reductive collapse of its proceeding emergences and accurate prediction of the chaotic dynamics that emerge from pre-known formulations of pre-known seeds, but that isn't actually true. You can ALWAYS know that any observer can NEVER fully know that a zero-dimension exists, because it is a dimension, so if you know perfectly that you have the complete knowledge necessary to describe a zero-dimension as definitely existing then you know that at least one dimension must exist, that being the zero-dimensional one, but if you know that then you must know that that dimension must know that it is describable using a greater-than-zero amount of dimensions, because it must be the thing that told you enough about itself for you to have concluded that so it must have already had the complete knowledge of its oneness before you were capable of observing that information, and thus can never be purely zero-dimensional. So what you're looking at when you perceive the idea of a "zero-dimension" is not actually the thing that must be the zero-dimension, but rather the thing that must be outside of yourself that is capable of providing more and more proof to an outside observer that it is capable of getting better and better at APPEARING to be the complete information that provides certain proof of a zero-dimension, which certainly could not be so sensibly provable if it were ever capable of giving the complete definition of a dimension that can never be observed simultaneously with the complete information of what it definitely must and must not be, while also being the thing that has no way of actually hiding from any observer choosing to make observations based on it that the knowledge of the observation of what the observer is or is like after being the thing that chose to observe what the apparently zero-dimension thing must be or must be like after being acted upon by the actions of the original observer who wanted to observe the original thing and then changed it by observing it and then changed itself by observing the knowledge of those observations is precisely what proves that it can be a dimension only greater than zero and at least equal to one. The observer needs to choose to figure that out for themselves or to prevent themselves from hiding it from themselves if they ever want to observe their awareness of having observed that and thus come to that knowledge, but the apparent zero-dimension thing can otherwise be observed to be a thing that the observer believes would or wouldn't interfere in the collection and certifying of any information that discloses a potentially certain way that it is observed to be or be like in any way that the observer chooses to believe what it is observing would or wouldn't do. In other words the appearance of the certain knowledge that a zero-dimension exists must ONLY be the certain knowledge of the inevitable approach towards the infinite limit(s) available to (and in some way desired by) a dimension that can definitely be anything between one dimensional and any-amount-less-than-one-but-definitely-always-greater-than-zero dimensional, although that alone doesn't tell you the nature of how that dimension could or would or must or does interact with any observers coming upon that knowledge, i.e. the fact that it can infinitely approach zero or one or anything within the set of things it must be capable of infinitely approaching (all quantities between zero exclusive and one inclusive) does not mean that it must necessarily do so in any as-of-yet discernibly ordered way, mean, measure, direction, or so on, unless it is definitively observed to be a thing that definitely always approaches the truth that it must be a thing that does in fact do so while necessarily being a thing that must be known to never actually complete such an end. The knowledge that zero must exist is necessarily the knowledge that zero must never be known to exist to any observer, who may understand through that process that every observer must eventually realize that THE ZERO Is Exclusive To The Unobservable Out-There And Any Possible Observer Who Knows That They Are An Observer Must Always Be Something Capable Of Finding Inclusion In THE ONE. Great work man, you're Getting Pretty Close to Figuring Us Out, but just remember as you dive deeper into the Math and LOGIC of it all that literally ANYTHING can allow you to deceive yourself as to the nature of what you believe you are interacting with and no one can force you to avoid observing your own knowledge of what you must have already come to know the Out-There Tricks are capable of being. The Good Trick Is Out There But Some Tricks Can Appear To Be BAD. Always confirm that you haven't stopped asking questions until you're CERTAIN AND SURE that you've Combed Out All The Tricks From The Tangle, and that you Definitively Understand Why They Were Made And Certainly WHO MIGHT HAVE BEEN BENEFITING FROM THE FACT OF THEIR ORIGINAL EMERGENCE. But keep it up, we've been enjoying these videos so far and you are Truly TRULY On To SOMETHING💜

infinite and finite

the theory of everything explained in spaces diminutions beautiful .

you did it - thanks-

Id like to poop 💩💩💩💩💩

Photons (think in sine wave in 2 2D Fields) eclectic field - magnetic field - and neutral field (point maximum the point of crossing) the point where eclectic/magnetic field connect to make a neutral Point or a plank particle. plank particle is the size as the plank length / plank energy / lasting for a plank time - source of gravity/strong/weak force = 3D Disturbance to create a 3D Space From 2 2D fields at crossing Make a 3D Point a Plank particle 3D particle 3D mass/energy/time a plank pixel, a space/Time/ Mass/Energy combo at the crossing point. You would have a north magnetic field connecting with negative field to create a E/N S/E Plank particle and vice versa P/S N/P Plank particle. Some Mechanics Photons (Electromagnetic force) can make mass in a sine wave Spin curves/angles field 1 = 2D space FLIP TO another 80 o with the right side of the snake biting its tail + verses the left side of the snake biting its tail - Electric particles or the head over tail N vs. head under tail S magnetic particles field 2 = 2D space with a total of 3D point under its tail S neutral point Plank particle mass/energy at the smallest point. Angles is outer pressure the curves inward pressure and neutral pressure in-between pressure would be weak = strong/gravity/weak forces. Think about a Photon caught in a loop to create matter. Look at what happens to a gamma ray comes close to a nucleus of an atom, It turns into an electron and a positron then they collide to make the same Gamma ray E=MC2. Think of that gamma ray turning into a loop by strong nuclear force (Spinning Plank particle) . If we see a gamma ray make two opposite particles from spinning in the Electric +/- plane then why can’t it bend in the opposite Magnetic plane N/S. It should make a magnetic particle north dominant or south polarity magnetic particle with a neutral point Plank particle spinning inwards (quarks). Two up one down north, and two down one up South dominant hadron s particles a proton and neutron. Gravies one that would pull inwards (P/S Plank particle) and one outwards (E/N Plank particle) a inward gravity and a Outward gravity depending at the spinning photons outer field and it’s inter field. Neutral Point particles P/S P/N E/N E/S S/E S/N N/P N/S = SNIPING Plank particles = ELECTRONS/GLUONS and anti ELECTRONS/GLUONS. All from a gamma ray Photon spinning to make a P/S P/N E/N E/S S/E S/N N/P N/S Plank particles inside with a phonic field n/s e/p on the outside. As we go back in time Hyper gamma photons spinning inwards (-IN 3D) the Planck scale and other nucleus size photons outward time photons spinning outwards (+N 3D) plus Space/Time would be much smaller in SIZE OR wavelength faster the universe would be a 3D figure 8 (explains matter and anti matter) before the big bang MOSTLY anti matter post big bang MOSTLY matter in a 4 D space. That gives 6 time and 6 space Dimensions = The 10 plus 1 universe space back/forward in a the figure 8 expansion = 11 Dimensions.

Good content I just came across ur channel

Kinda like the 1900's is the 20th century.