The shinny objects are dangerous. If you seek power your obviously weak. Power hungry people can’t be bothered to stop and smell the flowers and enjoy the simple things in life like. Tree Hugging 🤗 🎄⛄️
@zit199918 күн бұрын
Philosophy if preparation for death. Mindfulness is an aware act of existence. To draw the parallel between the two is the art of life; Satisfy the algorithm to pay the bills by bastardizing both concepts ; )
@SonUvSolarus6921 күн бұрын
your input mic volume is way too low, just a heads up. definitely enjoy these short form videos though keep it up!
@Wtfpatchh23 күн бұрын
Good one
@carlkuss24 күн бұрын
I think I like this. Makes me think of Riemann and his paper on geometry. Anyone want to take me up on this?
@adamsmainchannel378920 күн бұрын
Yes. Me. How is it called?
@YasirChoudhury-u2e27 күн бұрын
DAYUMN does that mean "Why my DEEZ NUTZ are?" ps- pls become NOT like exurb1a
@JacquesMare29 күн бұрын
Evidence? Source? Paper?
@BillHawkins-b7v29 күн бұрын
Every theory starts with a thought. At the origin of every breakthrough, there are no sources or papers, and the evidence is what we are seeking through exploring the unknown.
@AndrewLK87Ай бұрын
"Understanding what math is as an abstraction is the aim of Metaphysics" - The video was great overall, just had me lost at the concluding point. Metaphysics discusses the nature of reality, what constitutes its essential building blocks, more than simply what math is abstracted from form. Sounds very Neoplatonic though fun video I agree with the bulk of it and found it a great view!
@AndrewLK87Ай бұрын
also want to add a point that experiential knowledge of platonic forms, math abstracted from reality, etc., can differ from logical comprehension of platonic forms viz. meditation, direct perceptions, etc. imho the monkey mind being a common adversary that is subdued by way of observing the mind as if it is a sky containing cloud thoughts passing by unattached.
@SageReason28 күн бұрын
The ending simply illustrates the essence of metaphysics as understanding the true nature of the subject matter. Math being the most abstract subject, is still an abstraction of something more fundamental than itself, therefore understanding the essential nature of the most abstract subject like math, is the aim of metaphysics.
@CuriosityOfAbstractivityАй бұрын
What introduces the following elements to a system of equations in which one is the same or similar to another in which one can explain the same equation in terms of a particular fragment or structure of the probable cause of the problem.
@tstyleartistryАй бұрын
🙏🏾
@ZraeicroАй бұрын
Cool, stuff I guess?
@durereАй бұрын
I feel dumber myself after watching this. However, one point stands - any such searches lead to God in the end, no matter how you slice it.
@InTheDrkmtrАй бұрын
Motorboat that reason 😂
@MrStixOnfireАй бұрын
Nope..4 both it's your heart ...
@MrStixOnfireАй бұрын
The more I listen to this... The less it makes sense..
@MrStixOnfireАй бұрын
Who's early? Why do i have to wake him up?
@MrStixOnfireАй бұрын
Can i have your dealer's.. ummm .. i mean chemist's number please..?
@thegoddamnsun56573 ай бұрын
what
@sonicdiscord-no6xq3 ай бұрын
i am ur first view
@kelvinlord84523 ай бұрын
Our bodies are very rational but our thoughts vary considerably in levels of rational .
@veroniquegoulet80253 ай бұрын
LoL yes they are we all have irrational moments.
@Impaled_Onion-thatsmine4 ай бұрын
Reductio ad absurdum that's serious old
@Fighting-Spirit74 ай бұрын
Good job you are getting better at reading💪
@kainuscorevax38755 ай бұрын
LOL. No the materialistic ontology is not based on presuppositions that we are taught in school and "just believe". It is based in logical axioms. Base brute facts such as 1+1=2 and reality exists independent of your personal belief and mind ( the world was not made because of you, you just live in it). Ontology as you have presented it is based on presuppositions that you "just believe". That the universe itself can somehow be defined as rational , living, or being. Just because our minds are a part of the universe doesn't mean that the greater universe can be described with the same ontology that we would use to describe a mind. Went you do that the meaning of mind and person is lost as the words no longer hold the utility of communicating a singular set concept and are now use to vaguely describe "the universe". This is why " The Critique of Pure Reason" by Immanuel Kant is mandatory reading for first year philosophy students. I would suggest picking up a copy.
@thomas-k3d5 ай бұрын
I like the pursuit, but I think the presentation of the ideas could be improved. I'm referring to the writing quality in particular, but the ideas also seem half-baked.
@kainuscorevax38755 ай бұрын
They are half baked and were addressed in 1890 by Immanuel Kant in "The Critique of Pure Reason".
@kelvinlord84525 ай бұрын
Perceptions of realities sometimes vary substantially in accuracy , depth , fullness of alignment etc .
@kelvinlord84525 ай бұрын
The greatest truths will fit together with great beauty . The greatest truths are greatly aligned with the greatest realities .
@InTheDrkmtr5 ай бұрын
@mazharali41637 ай бұрын
❤❤
@itsmeitsme997 ай бұрын
The importance of philosophy in academia is paramount. Thanks for making this video.
@marshaanthony36568 ай бұрын
Idk, philosophize this; Some Biblical knowledge: Just some helpful education; from what I understand after reading the Torah and Bible..... There is only one Twin Flame and that is the Adam reincarnate and the Eve reincarnate everytime they reincarnate on earth. Read Obadiah thru Malachi to understand the story. If he fails his test as he did in Malachi 2:11; there is a significant possibility of a woman solely inheriting the earth as Prophecized in Micah 4:8. Look at the Tarot cards from the Rider Waite Deck, and the Bible. Empress card in Rev 12 describes the 12 stars in her crown, that is symbolic of the 12 Tribes of Israel. The High Priestess has the sun and moon under her feet like in Rev 12:1. When the Empress reads the Torah she becomes the High Priestess [see Torah in her arms] ready for her calling as the Rev 12 Woman once completed is Micah 4:8; The Daughter of G-d. Tarot was created for and by the Jews; King Solomon had the magicians [remember Solomon commanded the Demons WITH G-DS PERMISSION!!!!!] develop a tool for him to find his Eve [the Proverbs 31 Woman] as he knew he was the reincarnate of Adam. Further, the Twin Flame or the star is reserved for ISRAEL!! Isaiah 10:17 (KJV) And the light of Israel shall be for a fire, and his Holy One for a flame: and it shall burn and devour his thorns and his briers in one day; Micah 4:8 And thou o tower of the flock the strong hold of the Daughter of Zion unto thee shall it come EVEN THE FIRST DOMINION the kingdom shall come to the Daughter of Jerusalem. Delete this and watch ur hair fall out! Signed, Micah 4:8
@spacesciencelab8 ай бұрын
Is this similar to Sam Harris' ponderings when he told us to look at our hand, not what it is made up of but for what it is without preconceived notions?
@Phoenix-jl9nb9 ай бұрын
"promo sm" 🙏
@crix_h3eadshotgg9929 ай бұрын
Interesting perspective. So, does this mean that the absolute truth can slowly be uncovered by analysing reality till only the things that hold true everywhere and eternally are left? I liken the “Absolute Truth” to an Axiom in mathematics: It’s the fundamental, the atom of knowledge. Thanks for the vid.
@ShaahzaadKaleem9 ай бұрын
Good content
@stephenstrange9359 ай бұрын
.........A reflection of the intricate dance between the finite and the infinite, the known and the unknown !
@JUSTONEYOUTUBERFORNOW9 ай бұрын
Underrated
@Barde3n9 ай бұрын
first
@slimsXV9 ай бұрын
This is the kind of stuff I think about on shrooms.
@tamir85019 ай бұрын
🧐 ( ͡ ͜ʖ ͡ ) This reminds me of a little theory I wrote regarding the strangely unresolved phenomenon regarding quantum entanglement: In quantum entanglement, or what Einstein called "spooky action at a distance", the spin of one particle effects the other immediately no matter the distance. Despite Einstein's equations that say that no information can travel faster than the speed of light. Well, it's a problem still being debated. But does it really defy anything? Could it be where perception comes in?Could it simply be that this "spooky action" might seems instantaneous to us but is actually just communication done in a higher dimension? Although we're three-dimensional beings, we're actually moving in all the higher dimensions as well. One clever example of this would be this: a flatlander is moving on a two-dimensional strip, now let's make a twist and connect the ends, making a möbius strip. Now, notice that not only does our fellow flatlander have motion in the third dimension, but he also travels to both the front and back of the strip (for the flatlander it's like he "teleported" instantaneously from front to back).
@SageReason9 ай бұрын
The “spooky action at a distance” is the limit of our perception of “knowledge” generally, which is also synonymous with its physical limit, I.e., the “speed of light”, which is where information reaches an infinite scale, and it is from this singularity that a higher knowledge can be interpreted as simulating our world reality into existence.
@tamir85019 ай бұрын
While limited in our "perception of knowledge", or our ability to empirically deduce. And while information might reach an infinite scale in our "bubble" (spacetime). This holds true assuming the medium through which everything (e.g. information) goes is spacetime, but what if everything unknowingly exerts motion in even higher dimensions? Dimensions surely are an abstract concept; nevertheless, they each have certain unique properties like the more familiar notion of "time". Going back to "information reaching an infinite scale": The key element here is that there are different sizes of infinity. My comment on the previous video implying that dimensions are the geometry of infinity might shed some light on all this.
@nnuma999 ай бұрын
Colors dont actually exist. Colors are constructed in the brain. Subjectively, there is no way to tell whether my blue is actually blue to you, who knows, maybe what I call blue looks red to you. Technically speaking, we can never perceive fundamental reality (or the truth as you like to call it), however, we can deduce that it does exist. The color blue is a real and fundamental phenomenon within our universe because it does exist (ie we can detect it with scientific instruments, and sense it with our eyes), but the fundamental experience of true blue is filtered by the limitations of our biology. We can never know what true blue actually looks like, because we can only experience true reality at a limited and filtered way. Well, thats ny two cents anyway.
@SageReason9 ай бұрын
A deduction of it is still a form of existence. Although I agree we cannot “achieve” absolute truth due to the limitations you pointed out in the case that, there is always a “blind-spot” between individuals called their subjective capacity, or lack of, to completely be able to confirm whether colour differs as constructs of independent brains. However, it is always presumed that colour forms an objective basis for knowledge, at least in the abstract, colour also corresponds to heat, which is energy received by another facility of sensation. The substance forms an objective basis, bridging together inconsistent subjective relations, by the fact that it always presents itself into being, no matter the type of observer, or whether they exists into being or lack of it.
@NF-we4kp9 ай бұрын
Do you have a doctorate?
@NF-we4kp9 ай бұрын
@@MrTrouserpants101 Of course no one has to. But it does add a layer of validity to what’s said.
@SageReason9 ай бұрын
It only adds a level of validity determined by the social standard which dictates what is considered “true or not”, as to whether it is actually truth or not, is self-evident irrespective of whether the individual may or may-not be verified. However, the narrator does possess a Master in Philosophy and this work is part of his advanced phd studies later adopted as an “end in itself activity”, knowledge perused for its own sake, irrespective of whether it begets instrumental value or not.
@tamir85019 ай бұрын
I like to think that dimensions are the geometry of infinity, it helps me wrap my mind of different ideas in set theory (sucklike the prefatory idea of different sizes of infinity). Now, thinking of dimensions as levels of clarity, I start to see how one might coin the term "absolute infinity". Unlike other infinities which are in a sense accessible (as they are circumscribed by bigger infinities, just like dimensions); truth, can be thought of as an absolute infinity. An ultimate, inaccessible, ensemble. I share your holistic view of things :) I wonder why this channel gets so little views, it's very interesting and with decent visuals. One thing I would say is it sounds a bit "one-breath", some pauses could give a healthier dynamic.
@InTheDrkmtr9 ай бұрын
Classic!
@IvanVesely9209 ай бұрын
Is this about ontological or dialectical writing? Do you imply they're the same thing?
@ezraepstein693310 ай бұрын
The experience aimed at is pure consciousness. Not "pure thought." Which doesn't exist. To recognize a thought means you're conscious. Thoughts aren't conscious. They're a Content of consciousness.
@zenmasterjay110 ай бұрын
All thoughts are pure... crap!
@salmanban0510 ай бұрын
Just a nitpick, but the view that thoughts occur spontaneously is not just a Buddhist view, but a view in Hinduism, Jainism, and many other faiths as well. So you would have been better off referring to Dharmic philosophies here. But otherwise, a good subject to touch upon!
@AmericanPragmatism10 ай бұрын
This is a good video and I plan to watch your others. Was the voiceover done by a human voice or an AI?
@ßsjsjsvsgs8 ай бұрын
Voice done by you 😂😂
@NomadicBrain Жыл бұрын
Your cadence when speaking makes it harder to understand you, however your talking about some awesome topics that I don't see many people delving into. I'm curious if you have explored when one settles in to perceive the instances popping in and out, cast ones "gaze" outward and observe the dotting of other points which form the "definition" of this point, look at the constellation of those points and see how those constellations shift as you traverse from the perspective of one point to the perspective of an other in order to grasp the geometry of the associative web formed by our experience?
@InTheDrkmtr Жыл бұрын
This brings in to question ones faculty of observation. Which “i” is observing…
@Randomname2020 Жыл бұрын
Interesting concept I like the visuals, but q few tips. Iv built a channel b dore that go a good 10,000 followers. Your thoughts sound disjointed. It's jaunting in the begining. Take notes. Get a really good open. Done takes as many times as it takes to not sound jumbled up.