Good work my fellow Mathematician ❤ keep up I have subscribed
@dennismathacademy3 күн бұрын
Thank you Sir. I have also Subscribed to your Channel.
@maths01n2 күн бұрын
@dennismathacademy be blessed
@mjayapoornajha38327 күн бұрын
I solved it as X=1+log15/9 Is it correct or not?
@dennismathacademy6 күн бұрын
Absolutely 👍
@prasadrasikawidanagamachch393210 күн бұрын
K= 3.93
@dennismathacademy10 күн бұрын
Nice one
@oahuhawaii2141Күн бұрын
Use "≈", not "=".
@prasadrasikawidanagamachch393211 күн бұрын
X= 2.8271
@oahuhawaii21412 күн бұрын
Use "≈", not "=" .
@kamamalifestyle12 күн бұрын
Well explained
@sergeychuprov-e2i14 күн бұрын
Mistake. You cannot move 3 before log as you wrote
@dennismathacademy14 күн бұрын
This is not a mistake. Follow the laws of logarithms. Thanks
@tomnugent891114 күн бұрын
@@dennismathacademy Yes ,mistake the way you expressed it at 2.13. You corrected it shortly after. Log3^ + log5 then 3log3+log5 is correct.
@dennismathacademy13 күн бұрын
👍
@saladinayoubi977315 күн бұрын
plus astucuex en 3 lignes : 2.7^x = 7^2. 10 --> 7^(x-2) = 5 --> x-2=ln(5/7) --> x=2+ln(5/7)
@oahuhawaii21412 күн бұрын
Wrong! log(5/7) ≠ log(5)/log(7) 7ˣ⁻² = 5 x - 2 = log(5)/log(7) x = log(5)/log(7) + 2
@SGuerra16 күн бұрын
?????????????????😢😢😢😢 Não ⛔ vale isso!!!! Brasil Novembro de 2024.
@chetansanghvi339116 күн бұрын
That could have been solved in seconds?!
@dennismathacademy15 күн бұрын
👍
@mjayapoornajha383216 күн бұрын
@5.52 how 5 comes?
@АндрейПергаев-з4н17 күн бұрын
Решение в три действия, и занимает 1 минуту, не позорьтесь 1 Действие, 7^х*(1+1)=490, 2*7^х=490 2 действие, делить на 2 7^х =245 3 действие логарифмировать по основанию 7 х=log(7)245 Всё решение Можно еще 245=5*49, тогда ответ х=2+log(7)5
@dennismathacademy17 күн бұрын
Nice Alternative 👍
@oahuhawaii2141Күн бұрын
Everyone is so sloppy with their notation. What is log(7)5 ? Do you mean log(35) or (log(7))*5 ? If you can't write subscript 7, then use a different form: log₇(5) = log(5)/log(7) .
@rientsdijkstra426617 күн бұрын
x = 9: 9^9 = 9^9 = solution, (no calculation necessary). x = 1: 9^1 = 9, 1^9 = 1, no solution x = 0: 9^0= 1, 0^9 = 0, no solution
@dennismathacademy17 күн бұрын
Steps are Critical 👍
@PrithwirajSen-nj6qq17 күн бұрын
Sometimes u wrote it is a polynomial equation and sometimes exponential one. Polynomial equation The variables are the bases. Exponential equitation The variables are exponents.
If we do the thing like this: 9^(x-2) = 54; log_9(9^(x^2)) = log9(54); (x-2)log9(9) = log9(54); x-2= log9(54); x = log9(54) -2; is this a correct solution?
@ΝίκοςΖαριφόπουλος17 күн бұрын
it is correct but in the last step you missed something, it is x = log9(54) +2. Also you can simplify, log9(54)=log9(6x9)=log9(6)+1. And finally x=3+log9(6)
@dennismathacademy17 күн бұрын
This is great . Thank you
@fjccommish18 күн бұрын
Factors of -6 divided by factors of 1 are possible zeroes. 1 is the easiest to use. Try it. Synthetic division shows the polynomial is divisible by (x-1), so x=1 is a factor. What's left is x^2 - 5x + 6 The factors of 6 that add to -5 are -2 and -3. (x-2)(x-3)=0 x = 2 and x=3 The zeroes/solutions are x=1, 2, and 3. BTW, it's not an exponential equation. It's a polynomial equation. Exponential equations involve exponents that are variables.
@dennismathacademy18 күн бұрын
👍
@dennismathacademy17 күн бұрын
Nice Alternative 👍
@igor25able17 күн бұрын
YEs, correct approach, the problem does not deserve to be in Olympiad, may be for kindergarten though
@kamamalifestyle18 күн бұрын
Good work done
@dennismathacademy17 күн бұрын
Thank you.
@pkgupts115318 күн бұрын
Why people donot use better dark pen??
@adgf1x19 күн бұрын
x=3+log 13 base 7
@dennismathacademy19 күн бұрын
Nice Alternative
@GeorgeBulyga19 күн бұрын
8 mins ???? mental arithmetic 15 secs
@adgf1x19 күн бұрын
=13/8=1.625
@kamamalifestyle20 күн бұрын
Well explained
@tonyennis178720 күн бұрын
1:29 easy enough to solve here, all the following work is not needed. sqrt(9) = 3 so the answer = 4/2 = 2
@mauriziograndi175021 күн бұрын
Before doing any stretched calculations. By inspection only looking at the equation you can see that if the 3 into brackets could be reduced to 2 then everything would be over. To do that the x should be -1 or -5.
@prollysine21 күн бұрын
(k+1)(k-2)(k^2+k-1)=0 ,
@shanks404821 күн бұрын
X+3 = ±2i X = ±2i-3 X+3 = ±2 X=-5 or x=-1 We know that equation will have 4 roots and we can easily see those roots so we can directly equate like i did above
I like to add a way to evaluate 3^9 3^9=3^4*3^4*3 =81*81*3 =6561*3=19683 8 1 * 8 1 --------------------------- 64 1 1 6 ---------------------------- 6 5 61 Or 81*81=81^2=(80+1)^2 =6400 +1+2 80*1 =6401+160=6561
@oscaramorim723421 күн бұрын
💯
@dennismathacademy21 күн бұрын
Thank you.
@wawacat656822 күн бұрын
I just looked at the thumbnail, thought about it for like 30 seconds and got the answer
@dennismathacademy22 күн бұрын
👍
@GPP_feature4222 күн бұрын
It's blatantly obvious if you've worked in I.T. or are used to thinking in binary, and 4- or 8-bit bytes!
@beastmode379922 күн бұрын
This was too easy
@walthermatthau953722 күн бұрын
There are probably much more complicated ways to solve this problem 🤣 1. X != 0, 2. 5*5 = 25 3. x*x=x2 4. multiply the equation with 5 and divide by x (because it has to be != 0, still an assumption) 5. 5³ / x³ = 1 ==> x³ = 5³ ==> x = 5, because 5³ > 0 . That's it, right?
You should use standard notation. If you can't type in subscripts, then convert the form to divide by log(7): 7ˣ = 5*7² x = log(5*7²)/log(7) = log(5)/log(7) + 2 = log₇(5) + 2 { if you can type subscripts }
@PrithwirajSen-nj6qq22 күн бұрын
In the last line you wrote 2+ log 5/log 7 And in margin wrote log a /log b = log a (base b) But in answer you did not write 2+ log 5(base 7)
@kamamalifestyle22 күн бұрын
@prithwiraj this is clearly explained. Thanks
@dennismathacademy22 күн бұрын
This is clearly explained as 7^2+log 5( base 7)
@oahuhawaii2141Күн бұрын
Everyone is so sloppy with their notation. Technically, 5 (base 7) is 5, so log 5 (base 7) is log 5 with the base of the log defaulting to 10. The use of parentheses in the proper places is required for clarity. If you can't write subscript 7, then use a different form: log₇(5) = log(5)/log(7) .
@Luis-lm2lg22 күн бұрын
EXPONENCIAL
@stefanereimer771423 күн бұрын
Simpler solution: Sqr root both side gives (x+3)^2=+/-2^2 Sqr root again gives (x+3)= +/-2 or +/-2i x = -1 or -5 or -3+2i or -3-2i 🤷🏻
@dennismathacademy23 күн бұрын
👍
@SAMATOZ223 күн бұрын
At 2:30 you make and error saying that it = a^2-ab+b^2. It is, in fact = A^2-2ab-b^2. You use the correct expansion in the square brackets after that though.
@dennismathacademy23 күн бұрын
Thanks
@Kiwialt-nu9ve24 күн бұрын
Damn bruh
@GillesF3124 күн бұрын
My way: 3ˣ·3ˣ·3ˣ = 30 => 27ˣ = 30 => x = ln(30)/ln(27) or x = log₃(30)/3 🙂
Use Euler's equation, x_j=2*cos(jπ/2)+2*i*sin(jπ/2)-3, j=0,1,2,3, to obtain four roots, where i=√(-1)
@dennismathacademy24 күн бұрын
👍
@kelli21725 күн бұрын
3
@Alfi-rp6il25 күн бұрын
That is much too circumstantial. You should cancel as much as possible in the very beginning: 7^x + 7^x = 490 => 2*7^2 = 2*49*5 => 7^x = 7^2 * 5 =>7^(x-2) = 5 => ln(7^(x-2)) = ln(5) => (x-2)*ln(7) = ln(5) => (x-2) = ln(5)/ln(7) => x = ln(5)/ln(7) + 2. Done.
@oahuhawaii2141Күн бұрын
"circumstantial"? "I do not think it means what you think it means." -- Inigo Montoya, "The Princess Bride"
@kamamalifestyle25 күн бұрын
Thank you well explained ❤
@dennismathacademy25 күн бұрын
Much welcome.
@KazSurma25 күн бұрын
It is obvious from the very first view when you look at it that x=5. 5 over 5 is 1. 1 multiplied by 1 is 1.
@kamamalifestyle25 күн бұрын
👍
@slacroixfr25 күн бұрын
05:34 you wrote [b to_the_power log(a/b) = b] but obviously you wanted to write [b to_the_power log(a/b) = a] because this is what you substitute a bit later, correct?
@dennismathacademy25 күн бұрын
That is perfectly correct. Thank you for the comment
@EdLeeSB25 күн бұрын
@slacroixfr OK to use the caret ( ^ ) for exponents: 2^3 = 8 c^2 = c*c
@slacroixfr25 күн бұрын
@@EdLeeSB I thought of it but thought some might not understand...
@slacroixfr25 күн бұрын
@@dennismathacademy side note : I was actually wrong to write "log(a/b)" that means literally log of (a divided by b) although you meant logBase(b) of a Now, I do not know how to better write "logBase(b) of a" in simple text mode (with one single font size). In some programming languages we can use log(a,b) with log( expression [ , base ] ) "[ , base]" meaning "optional with default value of e"
@oahuhawaii2141Күн бұрын
No divide symbol. He isn't dividing 5 by 7 and taking the log of the result. He's trying to write log base 7 of 5, and doing a confusing job by writing the 7 below 5 rather than writing "log", subscript "7", and parameter "(5)". He is sloppy in avoiding standard form: log₇(5) . You need to realize that: log₇(5) = log(5)/log(7) whereas: log(5/7) = log(5) - log(7) and they aren't equal to each other. The identity is: b^[log(a)/log(b)] = a .