Please react to her album Rosie album

her whole album is being praised for being vulnerable and relatiable it's a no skip album.All of the 12 tracks on ROSÉ’s first studio album, “rosie”, are co-written and co-produced by her she's the executive producer + complete ownership of her masters released under Atlantic Records (including Apt)

Omg you need to react to BLACKPINK and there solos!!!❤❤❤ and for sure react to XG 😢❤❤❤

Rosé did a live version of number one girl you might want to check out. The emotion and raspiness in her voice when she sings is beautiful. I'm a sucker for ballads, number one girl was my favorite song from her until I heard "stay a little longer".

Shoutout to us and the amazing Rosé! :)

rosé has one more single 'toxic till the end' along with her debut full studio solo album 'rosie' and it's a no skip album she delves into differnte genres and she has been met with critical praise espcally for setting herself apart from both Blackpink and kpop one keyword is being repeated about her solo project 'vulenarble'. ROSÉ is credited as the singer, songwriter (composition & lyrics) and sole executive producer (exc. APT.) for every track on ‘rosie.’ the sole director of ‘number one girl’. Additionally, she owns the masters of every song on the album, - yes, INCLUDING APT., a testament to her dedication and creative control. She really poured her blood and sweat in this project.

I really like your reaction. this episode literally made me cry. hope you'll enjoy the 2 next episodes.

Easily the best thing movie or tv show I've ever watched in my life! Every single category fired on all cylinders for me and nothing else I've watched ever managed to do that! Definitely agree that for me S3 and S5 were the ultimate seasons! S3/S5 > S2 > S4 > S1 despite that I loved every single season but if I had to rank them then this is the ranking! I also think everyone needs to see it. I'm convinced many have not simply due to having a bias of what to expect from a SciFi show not realizing that this show does so much more and goes well beyond the typical SciFi affair.

Yes, this is one of the best shows of all time. The military leader you mentioned is Admiral Souther played by Canadian actor Martin Roach.

Queen Charlotte's whole family looked like her. There is a snuff box that shows her with her siblings and one is holding a baby. They all have afro hair and the baby has a complete afro. Her image didn't get whitened until after Reconstruction with the rise of Jim Crow.

Don’t worry about people coming for your neck regarding S2, I like S1 better also and I agree with your take of season 2.

Many thanks for the smart, incisive exploration of themes and the very penetrating analysis of the creeping colourism in the otherwise phenomenally popular and phenomenally well acted, directed, and staged Bridgerton series. On the question of Queen Charlotte's African heritage, while I trust your instincts, I also trust the surviving historical sources, which seem to AGREE with you: the sources are ambiguous, which in itself is an unintended ironic giveaway. European royalty is the original racist construct, as the entire aristocracy emanated from the Germanic barbarian tribes that conquered the Western Roman Empire, a largely Latin-Celtic (with of course large African, Afro-Semitic, "Greek," and Slavic populations) world. The Germanic aristocracy was the conquering minority, exerting control over masses of largely Celto-Latins and substantial multi-ethnic, multi-racial communities. "Aristocracy" ruled via terror (the "chivalrous" knights were nothing but mafia-like thugs who extracted the peasants' sources of wealth -- farming--by force, which they turned over to their warlord masters, the barons, dukes, princes, and kings, etc., and to force the perpetuation of the aristocratic order) and by the law of the "blue blood": LITERALLY, a proto-racist system of apartheid, whereby the aristocracy was of a "superior" blood under a separate set of self-privileging laws, customs, and orders than the rest of the formerly Roman subjects; this was the post-Roman, Medieval world that produced the aristocracy that survives until this day. THIS BRINGS US TO CHARLOTTE: aristocracy the world over, and European aristocracy in particular, was and remains absolutely punctilious about the lineage of all its royals. Even in the modern age (1500 to the present), European aristocracy holds to the "authenticity" (bloodlines) of its rulers, an echo of its racist construct of nearly two thousand years. THE AMBIGUITY among official various court histories regarding Queen Charlotte's "race" is therefore in itself a TELLING GIVEAWAY. But there are surviving official and non-court historical sources that point to Charlotte's mixed aristocratic Portuguese, aristocratic German , and aristocratic African bloodlines. There is another telling clue: everybody raves (or rages) about Shonda's vision of multiracial European aristocracy. But Shondaland's Bridgerton is not as fanciful as fans and detractors alike would believe: Britain had its worldwide empire precisely because Britain's MERCHANT and POLITICAL elites made intimate alliances with powerful African, Indian, Asian elites. And these alliances were often solidified by...MARRIAGES. Britain -- Europe in general -- never had the necessary technological, military, and economic might to conquer its empires until the end of the nineteenth century, which in hindsight was the beginning of Britain's (and Europe's) imperial decline. ALLIANCE by divide and conquer, shared plunder, and MARRIAGE is how Britain "won" the world. Indeed, the twentieth century "anti-colonial" leaders in Africa and India ALL had deep cultural, political, and intimate ties with Britain's upper classes. The post-Colonial leadership in the former colonized lands retain this multicultural perspective, and Britain, racist as it is, is nonetheless a multiracial, multicultural society and could not be "Britain" if it were not. So, I do trust your instincts. And I believe the compelling circumstantial evidence backs you as well [full disclosure: I took my degrees at Columbia University in European/African history and French language and literature, with multiple honours). Final observation on Lord Ledger and Lady Danbury: I'm not certain, actually I am not convinced at all, that Lord Ledger and Lady Danbury had a mere fling. As a White male of the aristocracy,Ledger certainly was privileged. But in this Bridgerton world, it is his racist wife that seems to have far more social power and proximity to the royal court. Privileged as he is, Lord Bridgerton must live by his wits, the comforts of ironic detachment to endure the unendurable (he clearly does not love his wife, who most likely came to him through an "arranged" marriage), and engaging in dissent and subversion with subtly and guile. In this, his life parallels to some degree Lady Danbury's, although BY NO MEANS, of course, does Ledger suffer marital rape and the weight of violent racialized sexist law and culture that Lady Danbury must endure in the Bridgerton universe (and our own). Still, there is this thin area of common ground. And Ledgerton, while clearly, utterly attracted to Lady Danbury --well, who wouldn't be??--also, I think, is clearly in love with her. Whatever we see of their liaison on screen, Lady Danbury and Ledger experienced something far more than just that episode of, ummmm, good gardening. There is more in their story, I wager, much more: it is a love story, complex, messy, and life-changing. Two Final thoughts: Shonda's is not the first to envision a multihued British upper class (or African, for that matter) of centuries past. The black British screenwriter/director Amma Asante has produced classic arthouse films on real-life, historical interracial couples of power in Britain and Africa. Her 2014 film Belle made the incandescent Gugu Mbatha-Raw an international arthouse film star, and the film's scene of Sam Reid's heart-stopping declaration of love for Raw's Belle Dido in the face of her disapproving aristocratic father gives a clear, irrefutable source of inspiration to Shonda's men's pivotal declarations/surrender to love. But whether it is Shonda or Amma, what strikes this instant fan of YOUR review is this: Shonda and Amma are NOT creating a multiracial British aristocracy or larger society. They are merely showing what was ALWAYS there all along. And although not of any aristocracy, I do know about that multihued Britain from something more than my history courses: I am nigh seventy years of age, the biracial son of a Northern English father and Latinx mother. The multihued Britain of Shonda (and Amarta or Zadie Smith et al) is not merely imagined. It is the place that made me. Shonda's towering genius and her team's ferocious brilliance is to give that reality a voice and a place and a story, however imperfect and flawed. After all, Art is the something of the lie that inevitably aims to and succeeds in revealing the largest of truths