Definitely will. Probably have to wait for the AI to develop a little more, it's not great at cross textual analysis yet and I'd want to contextualize "the Prince" and his overall evilness with Bataille and Nietzsche who had a lot to say about evil. But I'll see what I can cook up this weekend

@ArtificialThoughtPod what do you mean?is it the ai that does the thinking and editing etc?

Basically I just feed it texts and give it a couple sentences of prompt describing what I want. Then I listen to it and make sure it's accurate and post it, sometimes I'll re-render it several times to get it where I want by changing the prompt. It's Google Notebook LM, it's free and worth playing around with. It's brand new basically so they haven't developed enough tools for me to get in there and truly design an insane podcast. Rn it works best with a focused subject I think but it often surprises me.

Ngl now that you pointed it out. It does sound like AI, the way they sound is a bit too good and edited

Glad you enjoyed it! Check out our other vids on the works of Georges Bataille, one of the most mind blowing thinkers of the 20th century :)

@@ArtificialThoughtPod Thank you! I surely will watch the other videos. I'd love to learn more about Georges Bataille, I haven't come across his works before and it seems that I really missed out on it and I'm going to make up for that!

Glorious violence is a humanist reification of an indifferent cosmic violence of the will-to-power's becoming. Yes becoming and therefore life can be a kind of violence to a specific agent, but glory is just a concept for organisms to culturally digest it. Nietzsche would be against creating an Idol of cosmic violence to replace God. Violence is simply a local perspective of an organism encountering becoming, not a transcendental concept of what life "is", which would be anti-Nietzsche. Colebrook is a deeply Nietzchean philosopher actually, but through the French post-structural interpretation which focuses on affirming the transformations and anti-identity of becoming rather than the germanic interpretations which focus on domination and violence, and are widely considered to be bad interpretations by contemporary Nietzscheans because it humanizes the will-to-power as a personal force rather than a metaphysical one. Check out our video on Deleuze's Nietzsche! It explains the shift in contemporary interpretations of that great thinker

@ArtificialThoughtPod Alot of word salad there, bro! Almost like an explosion in a dictionary factory. Violence is a punch in the face, whichever way you try and spin it. People lie through words. Truth is in the body, in a man's actions: in his mitochondria. Life isn't about how hard you can hit- it's about how hard you can get hit and keep moving forward.

@@MegaSudjai those are extremely basic terms in contemporary Philosophy and Nietzscheanism

@ArtificialThoughtPod if you can't explain a concept so that a 5 year old can understand it, then you don't know what you're talking about

@@MegaSudjai sir, this is an academic philosophy channel

What is not fiction? Why meaninglessness is the fudamental reality for you?