but she is not talent .

that's just Montreal

H

Peter needs better lighting and get to the discussion quicker.

Only narcissistic people work for this company and blame the company instead of taking responsibility for thier actions

What an impact this speech made on me.

LETS USE HATE OF ASIAN AS AN EXCUSE SOMEBODY A LIAR! RACISM ETC...

Don't block China from buying all your farmland? REALLY!

all stupid bullshit. It is totally white topic, US propaganda, designed to bullshit you.

🥸🥸🥸 Dan H. Rosen is wrong 😁😁😁

Prof Wei is in really awkward position talking about this sensitive issue. He can’t give a negative answer for then he will not be able to go back to China again. However it’s still good to hear him out.

China is Brazil but 5x bigger, mostly peasants, 10% making $40k and 88% making $3k. With corrupt govt.. . . . And pension system about to break. .

It's permanent. Horrific Chinese demographic population collapse dooms China to the dust bin of history. China with it's astronomical public debt can't possibly survive.

Enough of the productivity myth. A haircut in China cost 5 USD compare to the 20USD in united state. Would anyone think the American baber is 4x more productive?

I think all the debaters failed to understand development economics. GDP the nominal kind is a fun comparison matrix, but would any economist say Singapore or Luxembourg are the most productive countries in the world? If so, what do these countries produce? that would make them all that important to the world? But I do agree that China economy is going through structural changes. It needs to move away from just manufacturing for export. I do not believe construction and real estate will disappear, it may go from 27% to 20%. There will always be urban renewal, transportation infrastructure, new energy infrastructure, military infrastructure.... No country has zero construction so it is never all going away, a false impression given by so many "economists " China is a middle income country now but it is on aggregate technologically more advanced than all countries in the world except for the US. The middle income trap is the inability to move up the value chain, raise personal income and currency value. With higher personal income comes consumption. We can all agree that China has moved up the value chain but a very large part of its population is still considered poor, a potential for growth or social unrest? Geopolitically, it is not in China's interest to be a high income nation. China is not a self-sufficient nation, it needs to sell in order to buy. China's future lies with the global south as the west decouples. It need to complement, not dominate the global south.

The format, although entertaining was too rushed and as a result superficial. The problem with the western analysis of China is that the Chinese economic system is not the same as those in the West.

Sad but true

Manufacturing/export has died due to decoupling and thats not coming back any time soon. Real estate bubble has burst and infrastructure investment has been oversupplied and is not coming back any time soon. Domestic consumption is in the gutter and isn't coming back any time soon. The birthrate has collapsed and this is not being reversed any time soon. Xi's hostile attitude allowed to West to see the CCP for what it is and this broken trust isn't coming back any time soon.

Someone needs to point out productivity comparisons when not carefully done are largely meaningless. To say that large portions of the Chinese state sector has low productivity is wrong. These sectors have low internal profit margins. Their productivity is unknown and difficult to track down. When we measure real productivity we can only compare accurately apples to apples. That is when we compare the real output per real input. We can say factory X is more productive than factory Y if factory X takes less inputs to produce more outputs than factory Y. The problem arises when we simply compare the monetary value of inputs and outputs. A comparison of the monetary values is not a comparison of productivity. For example a personal bowl washer for a Billionaire might make $3000 for washing 6 bowls in a day. While a restaurant dishwasher might make $30 washing 600 bowls in a day. Is the restaurant dishwasher 600/6 = 100 times more productive than the personal bowl washer (1) or is the personal bowl washer 3000/30 = 100 times more productive than the restaurant dishwasher (2)? This is a fundamental economic concept one has to understand to understand making productivity comparison. What is implied by the discussion of the economists here and what if often misunderstood by the public is that (2) is the correct way to look at productivity. That is wrong, (1) is the correct way to look at productivity. This is because monetary value is not limited by real factors. The personal bowl washer can have any arbitrary monetary income, $3000, $30,000, $3,000,000. Trying to measure his productivity by monetary terms is meaningless. His productivity can go up or down arbitrarily as his income goes up or down arbitrarily based on things that have nothing to do with the real economic production process he is involved in. For productivity to measure anything meaningful it has to be measuring real inputs VS real outputs not monetary values of inputs and outputs. With that out of the way we can see that there is no evidence that China has a productivity issue. When it comes to China there are two types of products. Ones it can make and ones it can't make. For the products it can make, it makes virtually all of them more productively than anyone else. For the products it can't make, it eventually learns to make them (usually in record speed) and make them more productively than anyone else. These observations have been repeated time and again, product after product, technology after technology. Furthermore there is no evidence that state run firms have low productivity. Low productivity means they take more inputs and create less outputs. There is no evidence that they do that instead the evidence is almost always that they overpay for inputs and undercharge for outputs. In other words they are just productive entities that take on monetary loses to subsidize the rest of society. That then is not a matter of low productivity but a matter of social choice. Its funny how people question that the Chinese don't have a social welfare system but what do you think these state run firms are? They are the Chinese version of the social welfare system.

With the benefit of 9 years hindsight, Eric’ analysis is surreally correct. Great insight!

To say “ it was a mixed marriage “ is to imply that Chinese people with residency in the province of Taiwan are not of Chinese ethnicity. That’s not appropriate, and misinformed at the minimum.

Ronnie is quite right about Singaporeans 😅

They know, because they planned it.

Is the HIV virus the direct result of gain of function research?

If they were in today's China, they'd be in about the same place in life, as successful leaders, entrepreneurs, etc. They came to America because they believed in America's values and ideals. Understanding both countries, they recognize that cooperation, not conflict, can best benefit both countries. So no, this isn't Chinese propaganda. This is a Chinese American point of view, based on knowing the actual realities of both countries.

☝️ P R O M O S M

Thank you

Absolutely tragic that the pigs in our country wrongfully accuses someone who’s innocent.

A few minutes ago I listened to your comments on affirmative action. It seems that once again the Asian community has shown great tenacity and the ability to exploit opportunities to the fullest. I listen to you describe being intimidated and starting off with a joke about your wife. Being afraid and intimidated was a constant part of my life. For decades I was the recipient of relentless state-sponsored terrorism. I also had to relent to state sanctioned terrorism in the form of racism in banking, employment, and housing. The constant threat of police brutality is a persistent reminder of just how vulnerable I am. Asians started to come to America in the 1970s at a time when America was successfully concluding its destruction of black businesses. Through a process of REDLINING this country condone the destruction oh black businesses. As Asian started to come to America they were welcomed with open arms by the same institutions and agencies that participated in the destruction of the black business community. The banks, the government support network, and insurance companies were eager to help Asians take over commerce in the black community. Black business had been the lifeline for black communities in a racist America. Black dollar circulated up to 20 times in the black community before leaving. After REDLINING and the influx of Asian immigrants those black dollars now leave the community everyday at sundown. Black dollars now go to develop immigrants and mostly Asian community and they are willing to kill to protect every last dime. The Asian Community is one of the most successful communities in America. Asian came with their culture, language, history, names, and personal beliefs intact. Key elements that were stripped away from black people Generations ago. The Asian Community has become one of the most successful communities in America. Black dollars financed their rapid assent to the middle class. There has never been racist cops roaming the neighborhood looking to destroy the futures of Asian children as they were in the black community. Now Asians have pressed the issue that they are being discriminated against by the government mechanism that tried to remedy hundreds of years of exclusion and the ongoing Relentless attempt to undermine black progress. America is a country where if you get a great education and work hard you can accomplish anything in less than a decade. The former slaves prove that. Starting with an extreme disadvantage of being a Slave many were entering the middle class just Ten Years After slavery. Black children outperforms why children in school. The former slaves were becoming congressmen, Senators, scientists, doctors, Bankers, Engineers, nurses, teachers, professors, and entrepreneurs. Unfortunately this progress caused a great white backlash. The Compromise of 1877 actually made it dangerous for a black person to even become successful. Successful black people were routinely tortured and murdered. Beautiful middle-class black communities were literally wiped off the face of the map and the residents murdered and pushed into Mass Graves. With the victory in the Supreme Court ending affirmative action once again Asians and racist whites have succeeded in undermining black progress. Next to abortion affirmative action was the main reason the Republicans were willing to cheat, lie and deceive to stack the Supreme court. The sentiment is to make America great again by undermining black progress. I'm tired of fighting let the Asians into Harvard. If necessary don't admit any more black people. Admiral Yamamoto went to Harvard and went on to plan the invasion of Pearl Harbor. Congratulations

Once again the race card well played.

i would be interested to hear what eric li has to say about the world today - he was correct 9 years ago when this video was posted

Let this be a lesson for other Chinese scientists and professors at American universities & corporations. Time to go back to China. Obviously quite a few have already packed up and left the US.

You all who start this planned crisis is one day going to stand in front of God on judgementday. Repent and turn to Jesus Christ before its to late. Jesus Christ is Lord and he is the only one who can forgive your sins and give you eternal life. God bless you who reading this. 🙏

I was looking forward to this presentation but find it extremely difficulty to understand because of the poor audio quality. One suggestion for the future programs is to use a simple wireless clip-on mic on each of the speaker.

Why don't they discuss how to prevent wars and nuclear proliferation with the same furver?

So they're still denying Covid 19 came out of the Wuhan lab where they were doing gain of function research? Still blaming human activity? Yeah, their human activity in the LAB!

1001 tales help us to keep the human part of the written and unwritten history.

Oh, boy! I can't wait for these non-elected jewish NGOs to save me from another pandemic!

Koplan and Frieden are former CDC directors and belongs to the "tribe" as does the current director Walensky . Koplan was caught “misappropriating” Congressional funds and hiding the expenditures through convoluted book-keeping. Koplan resigned under criticisms over how his agency handled the alleged anthrax attacks after 911. Frieden pled guilty to disorderly conduct , he faced misdemeanor charges of forcible touching, third-degree sexual abuse and second-degree harassment.

Eric Cartman for president ! kzbin.info/www/bejne/qIPWoXVteq-teKM

Best way to prevent their devastating pandemics? Turn off the TV and mainstream media, stop listening to the lies and psy-ops, don't comply with their tyranny.

Ooo 2050 Armageddon lol

is this the prequel or sequel to Catastrophic Contagion?

I bet there’s some gold in here….

Farmacomafia

go search the personal asset of Bill Gates. then ask yourselves if one can be sane of mind if he can buy the world

Event 201 was said to be a coincidence. A real world exercise is a high probability something could happen or we know it’s going TO happen. EVENT 201 happened because they knew it WAS going to happen.

13:30 wtf? Did he say he already knew there was a coronavirus coming in October 2019?

So what rubbish are you planning to push on people now?

Hi Joan Chen i watching you in judge dredd movie your so beautiful girl sending love from Philippines ♥️♥️♥️