1.2 Criminal Profiling Methods

[@mitsay]

Great content! I really appreciate what you are doing. I'm really interested in this area but it's impossible for me to follow it, so I was looking for a way to learn it by myself and these series of videos are a perfect start point!

[@RogerDodger1991]

This course is great,thanks a lot for sharing it! 👍👍

[@parkbom3764]

Federal Bureau İnvestigation Profiling or just criminal Profiling is up my alley for sure

[@senseirob7927]

Beautiful presentation,very detailed.

[@eldinasaur]

Are there... ducks?! In the background? Suspicious.

[@jeremyhennessee6604]

Good Video/presentation ma'am. I've read most of Douglas, Ressler, Hazelwood, and The Burgess' collaborations. (Crime Classification Manual 1st and 2nd edition is something I cut my analytical teeth on in a manner of speakin.) To be honest, I find the F.B.I. method/Inductive Methods of reasoning to be fairly useless for the most part,..and think the method(s) only gained popularity by virtue of Hollywood. (in particular Silence of The Lambs.) Canters 5-factor model is a bit more useful, but ultimately fails too, because it relies too heavily on induction and statistics gathering then applied to a profile, rather than deductions made after examining facts of a crime as if it were/is it's own Unique Universe of events. Brent Turvey (et al.) Criminal Profiling: An Introduction to Behavioral Evidence Analysis shows promise. (I've just finished the 3rd edition. Can't afford the others at the moment.) His/Their Ideo-deductive approach/Deductive Methods, and reliance upon SCIENCE, rather than statistically generated psychological probabilities is much more reliable I think. (but also limiting.) Many are under the misconception that Profiling is used to solve Crime. When in reality it's main uses is generally narrowing down suspect pools, and making (to quote from Turvey): an inference about the qualities and characteristics of an individual responsible for the commission of a crime, or series of crimes." Within the profiling communities, half the time you notice the same Ideological Warfare one might notice from rivaling Church Denominations . And that is a sad reality, because I think if one were to apply knowledge in ALL of the Methods Collectively (depending on the individual crime itself and it's personal analytic-needs) profiling would be MUCH more effective.

[@stefa7034]

This is soooo good! I want more!

[@mendozajesus1384]

I'm not a criminal I'm actually a cool person..

[@Clockworkpub]

So are people that watch people in privacy of their home.

[@Ufos4dahoes]

So pretty much its figuring out Who, What, When, Where, & Why?

[@user-zx3uh8kg1k]

More like where,what,why,when then who In that order

[@mickalinjezerx7104]

Saying that they only guess this is not pinpointing it only widen it. Reverse Sherlock Holmes

[@jasminemadden4138]

who was a profiler

[@jasminemadden4138]

or the rl version of him

[@Clockworkpub]

And when they engage the individual in public knowing where they are going and what they're going for they'll show up asking for the same thing. You profilers need to be behind bars. Along with you surveillance people, and undercover people. All of you cops

[@cyborglawpolice]

#CriminalDescription #IdentifiedSuspect #Descriptive #Intel #Resurrection #Law

[@janiceclarke1461]

What I want to do. Yes.

[@sebbastiann493]

lo you chief

[@lovebunnykaz]

common sense

[@sandeephansdak314]

....and!...."Ho?!... "...😃👓

[@mickalinjezerx7104]

20% of the time this may work even for the best of pro's

[@jakeums0]

Evidence? Where is this statistic from?

[@mickalinjezerx7104]

Do you ever how often they are wrong. Try to look at how many people put into jail every year to find out the be found completely innocent. In a good probability of people being.Things that they wouldn't admit to you that they probably got wrong. Wont and or couldn't explain how and other reasons. Less than 50% of people will end up in jail for the ( wrong reason, no reason ) meaning everything in and out of that.

[@mickalinjezerx7104]

Oh yeah I am full aware of my grammar. And thanks for that and you're bored. Next time you reply. Please make a counter argument. Or something that not a nitpick.

[@sing151]

60% of the time it works ever time

[@amberharmsen2497]

@@mickalinjezerx7104 but if you look at the statistics When it comes to people being proven innocent A lot of these cases don’t come from murder type crimes You tend to find wrongfully convicted people more often in lesser crimes As a result these innocent people your referring to wouldn’t have been placed in jail as a result of criminal profiling

[@sweetangel9900]

Not playing why

[@paein9642]

First

[@adamschneider5305]

My profilee was an older black man or 2 young white men with long hair. My teason for the older black man was 1. A black man is more likely to use a sniper type style. 2. There was a black man that sniped people from a rooftop in New Orleans.

[@CalamityNSFW]

im gei

[@glennscannell8802]

they profiled my personality, they were wrong inaccurate, the way they sum you up and read you can be full of errors, we are alll free associates, no two people are exactly alike, it reminds me of stereotypes, typecasting, bias & prejudice, they guessed correctly how i would act in a given situation with a lot of accuracy i got to admit, i like astrology, however when they analyze you it feels like that, a lot of people believe in astrology & a lot of people dont (subjective at best) 🃏

[@brinxloso2098]

I believe since astrology is more pulling things out of a hat because the broad spectrum of the personality of a human and there everyday behavior is much different than the techniques used in criminal profiling

[@TheCHUR86]

Can you stop being sexist by saying "he" what about the "she:"... Stop oppressing men.

[@mysoupistoohot]

omg shut up. in one study of 115 mass murderers, there were only 3 were female. that over 98 percent male likelihood. its is statistically far more likely to assume that a murderer is a male.

[@letters_from_paradise]

Andrew Conrad I hope that this is a joke...

[@Nina1984t]

Andrew Conrad You beat me too it. Learn the facts before you get butt hurt. Most serial violent offenders are men. Sorry, it sucks ...but it's true

[@igotbandaids]

I think that pronoun is used commonly. When someone discusses a situation, it usually starts with 'he' instead of "his-her".

[@sniffles3585]

Jesus Christ I’m pretty sure it was a joke