1.77 vs 22. here we go

[@marklawrence855]

I have both, but like 177 more, cheaper for pellets and better for target shooting 😊

[@chewy7192]

A real nail bitter! I was on the edge of my seat!!!! Cockadoodle!!!

[@keith6930]

I've got a few old mobile phones knocking about that are on the list of things to get shot at.

[@KathleenBeckinsale-qp1vo]

More fun again Geoff i find my 177 goes through rats but my 22 stops them dead but 177 needs less hold over 😮but like you i enjoy both calibres wonder what 20 would be like not many videos or reviews on sub 12lbs ones keep up the good work alan

[@geoffwillet7234]

To be honest alan I haven't really shot enough at 1.77 at the pests I've always used the 22. But that's me everyone is different thanks for the comment as always and your support hope your enjoying the show

[@alarmactionukalarmactionuk893]

Imperial measurements for said calibres are: .177 and .22 inch. Metric: 4.5 and 5.5mm

[@karlmaddox1209]

I shot a .20 calibre theoben sirocco for a good few years. Did the job no better or worse than the .22 hw80 I shot previously (the sirocco was much prettier though) or the .177 hw100 I use now. The pellet availability is the main issue with .20. After using those 3 calibres over a 40 year timespan (predominantly hunting) I find I prefer .177 because of the flatter trajectory and an added bonus is that the pellets are cheaper too. All the calibres ive used do the job if you do yours and do the homework regarding aimpoints etc.

[@Countrymouse123]

Both do same job as we all know some pigeons are armoured plated cloud of feathers and steel fly away

[@robertcichon8231]

Looks like the 1.77 did the most damage on the phone

[@RonBrydon]

Did all those cars behind your target escape?.Poor shooting!!!