1. Logic Lecture: Introduction to Modal Logic

[@guyappin0]

Finally, finally, finally. For years I've been trying to find a good series of logic lectures on KZbin. I must've typed the right metatag this time...Glad I did. Thanks for the creation. Through your contribution, we all benefit and in turn will be able to contribute and spread knowledge to others.

[@TheAGSTube]

Thanks for this course! It's been a while since I've been out of school and it's nice to get a refresher course without rereading the whole book! Cheers.

[@JesseMaurais]

It's true that a lot of people get hung up on notation. Which is a shame, not only because there is much to be learned, but because the symbols arranged semantically are quite beautiful. I can see that I'm going to enjoy this series. You're subbed. Also, anyone wanting an intro book with a decent problem set should check out Rod Girle's "Modal Logic and Philosophy"

[@TheMedKing]

Great job jason-- I love the way how many people in this world use their valuable time to educate the world--kudos to you ;)

[@pabloemiliorui2281]

Great class and great shirt

[@wuckydoodles2153]

Thanks for this lecture, Dr. Campbell! You mentioned you were a sociologist--I'm curious if you have any practical examples of applying modal logic in this field that you could share.

[@TripleEvent]

Nice! I was hoping you would cover Modal Logic!

[@MistyGothis]

Very cool, thanks for doing this.I have a background in mathematics, but I'm very curious what modal logic is and how its applied.

[@davidwarren1541]

Do you have videos on propositional logic?

[@MRBOBBY8706]

This is clear! Great mini lecture! Thank you for your time taken to make this for us!

[@bkasoul9643]

You are still needed

[@lastminutesaviours16]

Start at 2:30 you are welcome

[@ericgamful]

Very good stuff!

[@rumpranger65]

Thanks. Going to recommend this for learning.

[@XXgamemaster]

Most of the symbols that you use are pretty conventional throughout philosophy and mathematics, with perhaps the exception of the dot symbol (conjunction is usually denoted with a ^)

[@wenaolong]

Hello, Dr. Campbell. What is your opinion of paraconsistent logics?

[@elizabethjoseph2322]

Thank you so much.. ❤️❤️❤️

[@evrbodylovsnesto]

Great videos!

[@dgontar]

I have deep suspicions about modal logic, and always have. I am not sure it's ontologically legitimate, and that would amount to simply illegitimacy.

[@tobaas15]

Why?

[@metatron4890]

www.sfu.ca/~swartz/pw/ In a university will intro on modal logic books be this difficult?

[@MistaVega]

Wtf you did modal logic????? Awesome!!!!

[@Evidenceandcompassion]

It is possibly necessary if, and, not biconditional that this video is morally logical.

[@AndrewDrazdikJr]

Under 22 USC § 2451 Congressional statement of purpose; 22 USC § 6411 Ambassador at Large for International Religious Freedom. When the philosophy of science is applied to religious groups and law. eg. UN Convention Organized Crime "structured groups", and Japan Subversive Activities Prevention Act, and or Muslim Brotherhood (Mujahideen) with African American civil rights (42 USC 1985). See Also, Peral, Judea. Causality: Models Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge Univ. Press 2000. "epistemic".

[@francopalombo]

thenks!

[@mcs98e]

Thanks

[@david52875]

There's more than one conditional, and this is only part 1.