10 WORST Truck engines of All Time: Only Stupid People Buy!

[@AilaniMadden]

I’ll stick with the classic Ford engines like the 460, 400, 351 Windsor, 302, and 300 I6. They’re all practically indestructible and built to last. These engines are simple, robust, and capable of handling just about anything you throw at them. Whether you need power for towing, hauling, or everyday driving, they rarely disappoint. In a world full of overly complex modern engines with their notorious failure points, these classics remain as close to bulletproof as you can get.

[@BillieWilliams-l6m]

You are Correct

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@AilaniMadden You’ve got great taste, Ailani! Those classic Ford engines are truly legendary-icons of American engineering. The 460 is a torque monster, perfect for heavy-duty jobs, while the 351 Windsor and 302 are beloved for their versatility, making them staples in muscle cars and trucks alike. And the 300 I6? Talk about durability-it’s practically the gold standard for longevity! These engines reflect an era where simplicity and toughness ruled the roads. In today’s world, where modern engines often sacrifice reliability for complexity, these classics remind us why we fell in love with American vehicles in the first place. It’s not just nostalgia-it’s respect for designs that stood the test of time. What’s your favorite classic Ford engine memory? Let us know in the comments! And don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to Muscle Car Masters for more deep dives into the history of American muscle. Have an amazing day

[@CookeZachery]

However, saying they’re “practically indestructible” might oversimplify things. With proper care, sure, but factory weaknesses like oiling issues in some 351Ws are real. And yeah, GM’s lifter problems? That’s why classics still reign supreme-simple, raw power without the gimmicks of modern engines holding them back.

[@frankglasgow]

I'm really liking my built up tall deck Cleveland engine in my 78 F250 2 wheel drive so far.

[@Bbbbad724]

My truck 390s have been epic. 400 hp, 445 ft lbs on regular gas and mid -grade if pulling a car trailer in the hills . I have customers who are at 20 years of engine going through 3 chassis. The.020 over 390, C6 with a shift kit 2800 converter. Running forever and no oil consumption with 3 month oil changes.

[@jeromebecigneul2911]

Trying to meet gov regulations has made engines more complex and insanely expensive to maintain and repair. I think the gov should pay for 300,000 mile warranties for us since they are the main cause of the problems and making us broke trying to fix our vehicles.

[@CookeZachery]

but let’s not overlook how far engine tech has come. Engines like the 5.4 Triton may be more complex, but they deliver better power and efficiency. For example, modern V8s like the Coyote hit 400+ HP reliably-something classic muscle engines couldn’t match stock.

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

yes....The government’s regulations have definitely turned simple engines into complex beasts. Take the modern HEMI or Coyote, for example - awesome performance, but all the extra tech under the hood can make repairs and maintenance a nightmare. It’s not just expensive; it’s frustrating too. A 300,000-mile warranty would be a fair start

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@jeromebecigneul2911 You make a great point, Jerome Government regulations have definitely pushed automakers to innovate, but it’s true that complexity and repair costs have skyrocketed as a result. Back in the golden era of muscle cars, engines were simpler, raw, and built for easy maintenance in your own garage. That’s part of why we all love those legendary V8s-they were built to last, with parts you could fix without breaking the bank. Now, the idea of a 300,000-mile warranty? That’s something every car enthusiast could rally behind! It’s frustrating when the systems meant to improve efficiency and emissions end up making it harder for us to keep our rides on the road. What do you all think? Drop your thoughts below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel for more muscle car memories and debates like this. Wishing you a horsepower-packed day, Jerome

[@jeffreykayden]

Its interesting how much the government regulations on emissions have shaped the automotive industry. While these rules aim to reduce pollution and improve air quality, they’ve certainly added a lot of complexity to modern vehicles.

[@CookeZachery]

While I see your point about emissions regulations shaping the auto industry, as a true fan of classic American muscle, I have to say they’ve also tamed the raw power we once loved. Take the legendary 426 HEMI or the LS6 454-they roared with unbridled horsepower, cranking out over 400 hp without today’s restrictive tech.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@jeffreykayden Emission regulations have indeed transformed the automotive landscape, especially for American muscle cars. Back in the day, it was all about raw power, rumbling V8s, and minimal restrictions, which gave us icons like the HEMI, 427s, and Boss 302s. But as regulations tightened in the '70s, automakers had to adapt with innovations like catalytic converters and fuel injection. While it added complexity, it also paved the way for today's high-performance, eco-friendlier engines, like the supercharged Hellcats or Ford’s Coyote V8s. What’s amazing is how muscle car enthusiasts have kept the spirit alive, balancing classic power with modern efficiency. What do you think-are today’s muscle cars doing justice to the legends of the past? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t forget to share this passion for American muscle cars, and hit that like and subscribe button to join the journey. Have a fantastic day

[@AdelynDodson]

a friend of mine had a Dodge 4.7, and several family members and friends have owned them too, without any problems. I personally clocked over 200,000 miles on mine with zero issues.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

That’s amazing, @AdelynDodson A Dodge 4.7 pushing over 200,000 miles without issues truly speaks to the reliability and craftsmanship of these engines. Dodge’s 4.7L V8, known as the “PowerTech,” became a favorite for its balance of power and dependability, especially among muscle car fans and truck enthusiasts. It’s built to take on tough jobs and long hauls while delivering a solid driving experience. Hearing stories like yours really highlights why these engines have such a loyal following. For those who’ve had similar experiences with Dodge or other muscle car engines, let’s hear your story! Have you driven your classic Dodge, Ford, or Chevy past the 200K mark? What’s your ultimate high-mileage muscle machine? Drop your thoughts below and join the conversation. And don’t forget, we’re always revving up the nostalgia and passion for American muscle. Like, share, subscribe, and keep the muscle spirit alive. Wishing you a legendary day

[@FRESNOSTATE1559]

That’s good stuff.. my 5.7 hemi has been very good and very reliable and almost have 300k miles and cheap and easy to maintain

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

@@FRESNOSTATE1559 Gotta respect the reliability of your 5.7 HEMI-hitting almost 300k miles is impressive. But as a fellow muscle car fan, I’ve gotta throw a little shade: the 5.7 HEMI is solid, but let’s not overlook its limitations. With 345 hp and 375 lb-ft of torque stock, it’s decent, but not exactly groundbreaking in the muscle car world. Compare that to legends like the Chevy LS3 (430 hp) or Ford’s Coyote 5.0, and you’ll see where the 5.7 falls short. Maintenance may be cheaper, but performance enthusiasts might crave a bit more grunt. Thoughts? Keep those classics rolling

[@AdelynDodson]

@@FRESNOSTATE1559 The Hemi is a beast, and with 300k miles, it’s showing just how durable those engines are. The 5.7 is a powerhouse, and it’s great how easy it is to maintain with a solid aftermarket for parts. Same goes for the 4.7 I had; it ran like a champ with minimal upkeep.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@@FRESNOSTATE1559 That’s awesome, @FRESNOSTATE1559! A 5.7 HEMI nearing 300K miles is a true testament to Dodge’s engineering and the legacy of the legendary HEMI engine. The 5.7 HEMI, known for its mix of power, reliability, and efficiency, has become an icon in the muscle car and truck world. It’s incredible to hear how easy and affordable it’s been to maintain over the years-proof that American muscle can deliver durability alongside its roaring performance. btw, Keep the American muscle spirit alive by liking, commenting, and subscribing to the channel. Share your passion for horsepower with fellow fans. Wishing you a day filled with roaring engines and open roads

[@michiganedwards37]

200,000 trouble-free miles on a 5.4 Triton in your 2006 Expedition is incredible! That’s a real testament to how well that engine can perform when properly maintained. The 5.4 has had its critics, but stories like yours show that with regular care and attention, it’s more than capable of delivering long-lasting reliability and performance.

[@CookeZachery]

200,000 miles on a 5.4 Triton in your '06 Expedition is solid-hats off for keeping it running strong! But let’s not forget, the 5.4 Triton has been a mixed bag for many. While it’s a workhorse when properly maintained, issues like the cam phasers and spark plugs have caused headaches for owners.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@MichiganEdwards37 Wow, 200,000 trouble-free miles on a 5.4 Triton in your 2006 Expedition? That’s an absolute powerhouse milestone The 5.4 Triton sometimes gets flak, but your story is proof that with proper care and maintenance, this engine is built to go the distance. Ford really nailed it with the durability and torque this engine brings to the table, making it a legend for hauling, towing, and tackling the open road. It's like the spirit of American engineering roaring under the hood! To all our fellow muscle car and truck enthusiasts, what’s your longest-lasting engine story? Drop it in the comments below! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to the American Muscle Car channel for more incredible stories, deep dives into engine performance, and all things muscle Wishing you and your Expedition many more miles of smooth cruising, MichiganEdwards37 Have an awesome day

[@T.I.R24]

You got lucky...my grandpa has a powerjoke 6.0 with 700k on it...dosent mean it's not pure crap just like all ford modular engines. 26 years as a mechanic, and i van absolutely say from experience the ford triton are garbage no matter what you do.

[@CookeZachery]

@@T.I.R24 Respect your experience, but calling all Ford modulars ‘garbage’ isn’t fair. The 5.4 Triton may have its quirks - cam phasers, spark plugs, but it’s capable of serious mileage with care. And don’t sleep on modular beasts like the 5.4 GT500’s 540 HP or the 5.0 Coyote’s 460 HP, pure muscle

[@T.I.R24]

@CookeZachery ill give the 5.0 some props, but the 5.4 and v10 were absolutely pure trash.

[@muskaanehgj]

Ford really should have kept the 7.3 diesel in production, it’s a legend.

[@AdelynDodson]

the 7.3 Power Stroke is a legendary workhorse, no doubt. But as a muscle car fan, I’d argue that Ford's gas engines, like the Godzilla 7.3 V8, are where the real excitement lies for enthusiasts. The 7.3 Godzilla may not be diesel, but it delivers big-block vibes, 430 hp, and 475 lb-ft of torque out of the box-and it's designed for reliability and modding. Plus, it’s a perfect modern nod to classic muscle.

[@Bbbbad724]

The Godzilla is an FE reboot. It is a good choice.

[@AdelynDodson]

@@Bbbbad724 yes....but the Godzilla isn’t an FE reboot. The FE was a high-performance engine built for racing and muscle cars, while the 7.3 Godzilla is more about rugged simplicity and versatility. Sure, it’s got big-block vibes, but it’s a pushrod powerhouse made for towing and reliability.

[@Bbbbad724]

@@AdelynDodson I agree with you. Their heart was in the right place though. The pushrod engine is a step in the right direction. The 427 and 428 CJ are pure gold. The sound of the engine in the movie “Christine” is a 428 CJ. They were the music of the muscle and I love that roar like the king of the Jungle!

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Absolutely agree, @muskaanehgj The 7.3L Power Stroke diesel is nothing short of a legend. 💪 Built like a tank, it’s known for its bulletproof reliability, impressive torque, and long-lasting performance. Whether it was hauling heavy loads or powering through tough terrain, this engine earned its place in history as one of Ford's finest achievements. While the 7.3L diesel is no longer in production, its legacy lives on in the hearts of enthusiasts and those who still proudly run these beasts today. What do you think? Should Ford bring back the 7.3L in an updated form for modern trucks? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to explore more American muscle car history and iconic engines on our channel. Like, share, and subscribe to keep the legacy of American Muscle alive! Wishing you a fantastic day

[@jyotsnaelizabeth]

You might have missed it, but the 6.4L Power Stroke is known for splitting pistons, another issue to keep in mind.

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

The 6.4L Power Stroke, while boasting solid power on paper, has a well-documented reputation for trouble under real-world stress. Many owners have shared tales of piston failures, coolant leaks, and turbo issues, especially when pushed hard or tuned for extra power. One guy I know spent a fortune replacing cracked pistons after just 100k miles

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@jyotsnaelizabeth Great catch The 6.4L Power Stroke is definitely infamous for splitting pistons, a result of its high-pressure fuel system and intense cylinder pressures. While it packs a punch in power, it's a reminder that performance comes with trade-offs! Many enthusiasts recommend regular maintenance and monitoring for any signs of wear to prevent bigger issues. If you're considering upgrades, aftermarket piston options are available to beef up durability-perfect for those who want to push their engines even harder. American muscle cars and powerful engines like this have always been about that fine balance between pushing boundaries and maintaining reliability. What do you think? Have you experienced this or heard other interesting stories about it? Let us know in the comments below Don’t forget to share with your fellow muscle car enthusiasts and subscribe to our channel for more deep dives into American muscle history. Wishing you a fantastic day

[@randyhochstein8455]

I have a 5.4 Tritan, but I have a rebuilt one that has all the issues dealt with. It runs very nicely, and I’ve had zero problems with it. I hope that streak continues. ✌🏼😎🇺🇸

[@AdelynDodson]

@ That’s awesome your 5.4 Triton’s running strong after the rebuild! Definitely a solid engine when the common issues are sorted. But let me throw this out there, while the Triton’s a workhorse, it’s no match for a real muscle car engine like the Ford 429 Cobra Jet or Dodge 426 HEMI

[@randyhochstein8455]

@ hardly! But it works quite well in my truck.

[@AdelynDodson]

@@randyhochstein8455 Hey, I get what you're saying, the 5.4 Triton can definitely get the job done in a truck, but as a muscle car guy, I’ve gotta push back. Let me hit you with a story: My buddy had a Triton in his F-150, and after hitting 150K, it started spitting plugs like sunflower seeds. Meanwhile, my dad’s 429 Cobra Jet-powered Torino? That beast roared past 200K miles with zero major rebuilds, eating quarter-miles for breakfast. Sure, the Triton’s good for towing, but when it comes to raw power, durability, and heart-pounding performance, it can’t touch a true muscle car legend.

[@randyhochstein8455]

@ no argument here.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@randyhochstein8455 That’s awesome to hear The 5.4 Triton, when rebuilt and cared for properly, can truly deliver solid performance. It’s great that you’ve addressed all the common issues, like the cam phasers and spark plug concerns-it makes all the difference. Keeping that streak going is a testament to your dedication and love for performance engineering. For those curious, the 5.4 Triton is known for powering some legendary vehicles, including F-150s and Mustangs, offering that raw American muscle we all admire. Proper maintenance can turn it into a powerhouse that lasts for years. Everyone else, what’s your experience with the Triton or other iconic American engines? Let’s hear your stories in the comments below! Don’t forget to hit that like button, share this with your fellow car enthusiasts, and subscribe to join the Muscle Car Masters family. Keep those engines roaring and have an amazing day

[@SamuelHilda-e7b]

i owned a ford 6.0l, and if i had traded it at 120,000 miles, it would have been a solid engine. keeping it longer turned into a nightmare.

[@AdelynDodson]

A buddy of mine kept his 6.0L beyond 120k miles, and it was a nightmare: blown head gaskets, EGR cooler failure, and constant injector problems. Ford tried fixing it with updates, but honestly, without bulletproofing it, it was a ticking time bomb.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Thanks for sharing your experience, @SamuelHilda-e7b The Ford 6.0L Power Stroke sure has its highs and lows. Many enthusiasts say it was a beast for power and towing when maintained properly, but after those 120,000 miles, issues like EGR valves and head gaskets could creep in if not addressed. That’s where preventive maintenance becomes the hero-or the villain if overlooked It’s a great lesson for all muscle car and truck fans: timing your upgrades or trades is key to getting the most out of these iconic engines. Did you know Ford’s legendary 7.3L Power Stroke, which preceded the 6.0L, is often hailed as one of the most durable diesel engines ever? Drop your thoughts on that To everyone watching, share your Ford stories or questions below! Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more deep dives into American Muscle Cars. Have a fantastic day, Samuel

[@CookeZachery]

yes....The 6.0L was a beast when it was fresh, but you're spot on-once it hit that 120k mark, things can go downhill fast. The early 6.0L Power Stroke engines were known for some serious issues, especially with the head gaskets and the oil cooler. If you caught it early, though, it could have been a solid engine. But yeah, keeping it past that threshold without addressing the weak spots just invites trouble. A proper trade-in would've saved a lot of headache. But man, when they ran right, they were hard to beat

[@ericgelinow]

My 6.0 powerstroke 2005 F250 king ranch Just passed a quarter million miles. The secret is don’t let a 16-year-old drive it, use factory, fluids and filters, religious adherence to the maintenance schedules for filters and fluids, and don’t start throwing after market power parts on. I use it to tow a 14,000 pound fifth wheel, just as my brother-in-law and sister did for the eight years before I owned it, as did the previous owner (original) before them since new. Deltas between the cooling and oil are still within 5°, it can be driven hard, it has towed that load over the Appalachian mountains multiple times in the same week, and it has performed just beautifully that has always been the secret of the 6.0 at least from 2005 through 2007. The first two years were particularly rough, especially on vehicles that had long idle times, which goes right back to the whole lack of removal of sand from the casting of the block originally. I do have a coolant line spin on style, Donnelly filter, and in terms of what I’ve done to the vehicle and the drive train, that’s it. It’s below freezing Right now, and will be for the next week, I have it in a block heater, and I use archoil products with nothing but fantastic results.

[@AdelynDodson]

@@ericgelinow The 6.0 Powerstroke can be solid, but only if it’s meticulously maintained like you’re doing-hats off for hitting a quarter mil towing that much weight! That said, those 6.0 issues (head gaskets, EGR, injectors) were infamous, especially pre-2005 due to design flaws like the torque-to-yield head bolts and poor EGR cooling. Ford tried fixes, but many engines needed upgrades like ARP studs and a bulletproof EGR cooler to truly shine. Maintenance alone won’t save a poorly designed setup, but when done right, as you’ve proven, it’s a workhorse.

[@annilye2gr]

I’d be ready to start a debate if anyone dared to claim the 7.3 was a bad engine

[@CookeZachery]

Hey @annilye2gr, I respect the passion, but I’ll have to disagree on calling the 7.3 a flawless engine. It’s a beast, no doubt, but let’s talk details. The Ford 7.3 Godzilla V8 delivers solid torque and durability, but some criticize its naturally aspirated setup, arguing it lacks the high-end horsepower compared to supercharged rivals. While its 430 hp and 475 lb-ft torque shine in trucks, muscle car fans crave rev-happy engines. The old-school 426 HEMI or 427 FE showed how muscle should roar! The 7.3 is great in its lane, but it’s not perfect for every gearhead’s dream. Let’s hear your thoughts

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Hey @annilye2gr anyone who dares to badmouth the 7.3 better bring their A-game because that engine is a legend! The 7.3-liter V8, especially the Power Stroke diesel, is a workhorse that has earned its reputation for durability, torque, and sheer toughness. Whether it’s hauling heavy loads or just flexing that raw power, the 7.3 has been a fan-favorite for a reason. It’s not just an engine; it’s a symbol of American engineering that refuses to quit. We’d love to hear from the rest of the crew-what are your thoughts on the 7.3? Do you have a favorite muscle car engine that deserves a shout-out? Let us know in the comments! And hey, don’t forget to share this with your fellow car enthusiasts and subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more revved-up content. Wishing you a horsepower-packed day

[@teganze]

Guess I got lucky, I had two Grand Cherokee's with the 4.7 and they went over 200k before I sold them without a hiccup.

[@AdelynDodson]

The 4.7L PowerTech had its moments, but many owners weren’t so lucky. Common issues like dropped valve seats, cracked heads, and oil sludge were deal-breakers for muscle car fans expecting reliability. I had a buddy with a Grand Cherokee that barely hit 120k before the heads failed, left him stranded.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

That's awesome, @teganze The 4.7L PowerTech V8 in the Grand Cherokee was truly a beast-reliable, smooth, and packing just the right punch for its class. Hitting over 200k miles without any hiccups is a testament to how well those engines were built and maintained. Fun fact: The 4.7L was even used in the Jeep Commander and Dodge Dakota, showcasing its versatility and performance. Did you know it produced up to 265 horsepower in the High-Output version? Now we want to hear from everyone else-what's the highest mileage you've ever gotten from a V8 engine? Any favorite stories about your rides? Share them in the comments below! Let’s keep celebrating the engines and stories that make American vehicles legendary. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to our channel, Muscle Car Masters, for more awesome content Wishing you a gear-grinding, tire-smoking great day

[@houseofno]

I call these engines "EcoBUST" instead.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@houseofno Haha, "EcoBUST" that's a clever twist Those engines certainly have a reputation for leaving folks divided. But let’s not forget, even the missteps of automakers teach us valuable lessons in engineering and performance. It's a reminder of how innovation sometimes misses the mark before hitting the sweet spot Speaking of engines that truly deliver, the world of American Muscle is packed with beasts that changed history-like the roaring 426 HEMI or the legendary Ford 427 SOHC. Those powerhouses didn't just power cars; they powered dreams. What’s your all-time favorite muscle car engine? Let’s hear your picks in the comments! And don’t forget to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for deep dives into the legends, the quirks, and the stories behind these machines. Share this with fellow enthusiasts, and let’s keep the passion alive. Wishing you a fantastic day

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

Calling them 'EcoBUST' is a bit harsh, but I get where you're coming from. However, these engines, like Ford's EcoBoost, deserve a fair look. The 3.5L EcoBoost, for example, produces up to 450 hp and 510 lb-ft of torque in the Raptor, hardly weak numbers

[@CookeZachery]

The new GM trucks are facing the same lifter issues as before, but now they affect every cylinder, not just half of them

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

Hey @CookeZachery, I see where you’re coming from, but let’s dig into this a bit more. GM’s Active Fuel Management and Dynamic Fuel Management systems do have lifter issues, but they’re not across the board. These systems boost fuel efficiency by deactivating cylinders, but poor oil maintenance or improper lifter break-in often causes failures. Engines like the 6.2L V8 still deliver over 400 hp with solid reliability when cared for properly. It's frustrating for enthusiasts, but GM’s push for power and efficiency keeps the V8 spirit alive. Don't count them out just yet-these engines can still haul and roar

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

The Ford 5.4 with the 2-valve setup is reliable, but the 3-valve version? Not so much

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Absolutely, Keith, you’re spot on The 5.4L 2-valve is a workhorse-simple, durable, and loved for its reliability. It’s a favorite among truck owners and performance enthusiasts alike. However, the 3-valve version, while offering more power and efficiency, introduced some headaches, like those infamous cam phasers and spark plug issues. It’s a love-hate relationship for many Ford fans! For those diving into the world of modular Ford engines, proper maintenance is key. Stick to regular oil changes and invest in quality components if you're running a 3-valve setup. Speaking of upgrades, what do you think about adding a performance intake or a custom tune? Let us know your thoughts To everyone here, share your experience with Ford engines in the comments. Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and explore more on American Muscle Cars-there’s always more history and horsepower waiting. Have an awesome day, Keith

[@AdelynDodson]

Totally get where you're coming from, but gotta disagree on the 3-valve 5.4! It’s true the early ones had cam phaser issues, but Ford sorted that out. The 3V actually made more power (300+ hp) and breathed better than the 2V. Keep it maintained, and it’s solid! Both versions brought their A-game to the modular legacy.

[@jimmyaber5920]

3 valve 5.4s are.all over the place with over 250 k with no repairs. I have seen many with chain and cam phaser at 100k or soon after. Every one I have taken apart with problems is sludged at least a bit. The trouble free ones I have done valve cover gaskets on at 175k were clean inside. Even today, Jan 2025, synthetic oils of the most expense boutique brands offers no fix for oil collecting combustion byproducts with miles and slow driving and high idle/warmup time. You can't carry the fine dust air filters don't catch in the oil wearing chain rollers and pin holes and wear needle bearings in rockers arms or the combustion waste that hardens polymers making the plastic on chain guides and hardening seals. More frequent oil changes, 5k miles, makes a huge difference when the engine tops 100k miles. I see it daily in my shop. Same for GM V8 and Hemi V8. I don't think the LT GM lifter failure and cam failures are an exception as that happens with some randomness. My customers with those engines that drive hard and fast seem to escape the problem making me think that low rev cylinder deactivation/reactivation is a factor in the failure. I have driven these at 45 mph and the shifting to high gear and cyl deactivation makes it downshift and reactivate cylinder with the slightest of grade change.

[@AdelynDodson]

@@jimmyaber5920 Hey, I hear ya, but I gotta push back on the 3V 5.4! Those cam phaser issues? Early models, sure, but Ford cleaned that up, and this engine's a beast when maintained right. The 3-valve tech gave it better airflow and over 300 hp-a big step up from the 2V. Plus, it’s all about care-regular oil changes and good driving habits make all the difference. And speaking of HEMIs and LT V8s, yeah, cylinder deactivation can cause wear, but hard-driving folks tend to avoid it. These engines are built to roar, not crawl

[@GatorsWin]

The Triton engine? Rapid sludge build up? Regular oil changes prevent sludge. I have owned several vehicles with the Triton. As far as the spark plug issues its an easy fix, yep the fix comes in a lirtle plastic bottle its called anti seize

[@AilaniMadden]

I respect your experience with the Triton, but let's be real here-the engine had its quirks. Regular oil changes help, sure, but the 4.6L and 5.4L V8s were infamous for sludge issues, even with good maintenance. The spark plug fix? Anti-seize only works if the plugs don’t snap during removal-a notorious headache for Triton owners. This engine wasn’t built with the same durability as Ford's earlier legends like the 428 Cobra Jet or even the 302 Boss. It’s not about bashing it, just recognizing it’s not in the same league as the true icons of American muscle.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@GatorsWin You bring up some solid points! The Triton engine definitely has its quirks, but you're right-regular oil changes and proper maintenance can go a long way in preventing sludge buildup. Anti-seize for the spark plug threads? Absolutely genius! It’s such a simple solution, yet it saves countless headaches for Triton owners. Ford’s Triton might not be perfect, but with the right care, it’s proven to hold its own. For all our gearheads out there, what do you think? Are Triton engines truly among the "worst," or do they just get a bad rap because of a few well-known issues? Share your stories and tips below-we’d love to hear them! Don’t forget to check out more awesome American Muscle Car content on our channel. Like, share, and hit that subscribe button to join the ride. Wishing you an awesome day and miles of open road ahead

[@Thumper68]

The 4.7L was fine when used in Dakotas it shouldn’t of been in ram 1500s

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

The 4.7L Magnum V8, while not as iconic as the HEMIs, brought solid performance to the Ram 1500 for its time. It produced up to 235 hp and 295 lb-ft of torque in later iterations-plenty capable for light-duty hauling and daily driving. Sure, it didn’t have the brute force of larger engines, but it offered decent fuel efficiency and reliability. Let’s not forget, it also shared lineage with Mopar's small-block innovation. While better suited for mid-sized trucks like the Dakota, it was far from underpowered for a base Ram option.

[@CookeZachery]

Yes....The 4.7L V8 was decent in the Dakota, but in the Ram 1500, it just didn't have the grunt to match the truck's size and power expectations. The engine was originally designed to be a more fuel-efficient option, but when you're driving a full-size truck like the Ram 1500, you need something that really brings the power, like the HEMI 5.7L or even the 5.9L Magnum.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@Thumper68, you’ve hit the nail on the head The 4.7L PowerTech V8 was indeed a solid performer in the lighter and nimbler Dakota, but dropping it into the heavier Ram 1500 was a tall order. It struggled to deliver the torque needed to haul that kind of weight, especially when compared to the legendary 5.7L HEMI. Still, the 4.7L was a workhorse for its time, boasting modern SOHC design and decent reliability. If only they had tuned it for higher torque output, it might have been a game-changer for the Ram lineup! What do you think? Should Chrysler have beefed up the 4.7L for the Rams or just stuck with the HEMI all the way? Let us know in the comments! And remember, for more muscle car insights, subscribe to American Muscle Cars. Share your thoughts, share the passion, and keep the V8 spirit alive Wishing you an amazing day

[@shawnfaircloth4359]

The 5.4 3v was from 05 to 10 the 04 lightning you showed in the video had a 5.4 2v S/C engine. F150s was 97-04 and 05-10

[@CookeZachery]

You’re right the 5.4 3V ran ’05-’10, but the Lightning you mentioned actually used the 5.4 2V S/C engine. However, F-150 models had the 5.4 3V from ’04 (Heritage) through ’10, so there’s overlap.

[@AdelynDodson]

The 5.4L 2V Supercharged engine in the 2004 Lightning was a beast, producing 380 hp and 450 lb-ft of torque. The 2005-2010 F-150 switched to the 5.4L 3V, which had a bit more refined performance, putting out 300 hp and 365 lb-ft of torque. Both engines were built for serious muscle, but that '04 Lightning still holds a special place in muscle truck history. Appreciate the info

[@shawnfaircloth4359]

@AdelynDodson yes sir. I had a 01 lightning and sold it a few years ago and got a 02 harley davidson f150 which has the same 5.4 S/C engine

[@AdelynDodson]

@@shawnfaircloth4359 Hey, gotta correct ya there, brother! The ‘01 Lightning and the ‘02 Harley Davidson F-150 may share the 5.4L S/C engine, but they’re tuned differently. The Lightning cranks out 380 hp and 450 lb-ft of torque, while the Harley’s version puts down 340 hp and 425 lb-ft. Ford gave the Lightning extra love with a more aggressive tune, making it the king of muscle trucks. That Eaton M112 blower on the Lightning was dialed in for peak performance, while the Harley leaned toward a balance of power and luxury. Both are beasts, but the Lightning’s raw edge is unmatched

[@shawnfaircloth4359]

@AdelynDodson yes i know they are tuned differently and the harley truck also had a bigger blower pulley which made it run a couple of lbs less of boost! Ford did that because of weight and they thought people would be towing more with the harley or that's what I have seen and read about on the forums anyways! Which my truck has a 6lb lower ported blower 60lb injectors jlt intake and full exhaust. I liked the lightning looks but after having both I like the harley better rides better and has alot more room

[@AlbertHoudlett-b7n]

I HAVE A 2006 5.4 ENGINE IT HAS 160K ON IT AND ITS THE MOST RELIABLE MOTOR I EVER HAD.CHANGE OIL EVERY 3K AND USE RECOMENDED OIL AND YOU WILL HAVE NO PROBLEMS,IF YOU FORGET STRICT MAITMENCE YOU WILL HAVE PROBLEMS

[@CookeZachery]

Respect on the 5.4, but as a muscle car fan, I've got to say it's solid but not bulletproof. Timing chain tensioners and cam phasers can be trouble over time. Maintenance helps, but design quirks exist. Compared to classics like a 428 Cobra Jet, it’s reliable but lacks raw muscle character.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@AlbertHoudlett-b7n Thanks for sharing your experience with the 5.4 engine! It’s fantastic to hear that yours has been a rock-solid performer at 160K miles-proof that regular oil changes and sticking to recommended maintenance can make a world of difference. Many folks overlook the importance of routine care, but as you've shown, it’s the key to keeping these engines running strong for years. For muscle car fans, the 5.4 also has ties to legends like the Ford GT and SVT Lightning, which shows how versatile this engine really is. We'd love to hear more stories like yours-whether it’s about reliable trucks, classic rides, or muscle car builds. What do you think? Do you agree maintenance makes or breaks an engine? Let us know in the comments below, and don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more American Muscle Car content. Wishing you a great day

[@wickertwm]

I was really impressed with my 3.0 litre Toyota V6. After the 2.4 litre 4 cylinder the V6 ran like silk. Smoothest engine I have ever had. It performed great through out my ownership (except when I lost a spark plug due to my own mistake. Toyota replaced the head at no charge after 70k miles. No complaint with Toyota at all. I see it listed as one of the worse truck engines all the time, but if you do the maintenance and don't run the crap out of it, it can be a very nice engine.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Hey there It's awesome to hear about your experience with the 3.0L Toyota V6-sounds like it served you well! Smooth and reliable engines, especially with proper care, can definitely leave a lasting impression. Maintenance is key, and your story proves that a well-kept engine can perform like a dream, even with a little hiccup along the way. Props to Toyota for stepping up and replacing the head after 70k miles-that’s solid customer support right there Now, for all the muscle car fans here, let’s compare notes-what’s the smoothest or most reliable engine you’ve owned? Whether it’s an old-school big block or a modern HEMI, drop your stories in the comments! Don’t forget to hit that subscribe button and share this with other car enthusiasts. Let’s keep the American muscle spirit alive and rolling Wishing you an amazing day, and keep those engines roaring

[@AilaniMadden]

@wickertwm Hey, no doubt Toyota’s V6 engines have their merits, but let’s talk American Muscle! When you compare that 3.0L to the legendary V8s like a Ford 427 or a Mopar 440, it’s a whole different league. Those big-blocks weren’t about silk-they were about raw, ground-shaking power. Take the 1970 Chevelle SS 454, for example-450 hp, and torque for days. Maintenance matters for any engine, but muscle cars are built to take some hard miles and still roar. Your Toyota’s smooth, but muscle cars give you heart-pounding performance that Toyota can’t touch.

[@joshuasnyder4794]

Ain’t no way the 4.7 V8 from Dodge was worse than the 5.4 Triton.

[@AilaniMadden]

The 4.7 V8 from Dodge wasn’t bad, but it was more of a workhorse than a powerhouse. Rated around 235-310 hp depending on the year, it lacked the torque to pull with authority. Meanwhile, Ford’s 5.4 Triton, despite its issues, pushed out 260-380 hp and up to 510 lb-ft of torque in some performance setups like the SVT Lightning. Sure, the Triton had its flaws (hello, spark plug issues), but for raw towing or hauling muscle, it edges out the 4.7. Dodge had stronger contenders, but this ain't one of 'em.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@joshuasnyder4794 Oh, you’ve got a hot take there, and I love the passion, Joshua The Dodge 4.7 V8 and the Ford 5.4 Triton have both had their ups and downs. While the 4.7 had reliability issues like timing chain wear and oil sludge build-up, it also delivered solid performance in mid-sized trucks and SUVs. Meanwhile, the Triton became infamous for spark plug issues but earned respect for its torque in heavy-duty applications. Both engines had their quirks, but they powered some unforgettable machines. Now, let’s hear it from the rest of the muscle car community-what’s your take? Is the Dodge 4.7 V8 underrated, or does the Ford 5.4 Triton deserve more respect? Let us know in the comments below! And don’t forget to share your thoughts, subscribe to our channel, and spread the love for American Muscle Cars. Wishing you a fantastic day, Joshua-keep that engine roaring

[@joshuasnyder4794]

@@AilaniMaddenI owned both for many years. I guess I can only go by how many times in the shop my Ford was over my dodge during my ownership. Hands down the Ford was in more. 2 times for exhaust manifold bolts. I do agree the 5.4 was in more heavy duty application then the 4.7. And I will admit some bias against Ford (6.0, 6.4 diesels)

[@Thumper68]

The 3 valve 5.4L tritons should be avoided.

[@AilaniMadden]

@Thumper68, I gotta respectfully disagree with you on the 3-valve 5.4L Triton. While it’s true they had some issues like the cam phasers and spark plug design, those can be fixed with proper maintenance and upgrades. Let’s not forget this engine cranked out 300+ hp in some models and had serious torque for its time-perfect for hauling or modding. Plenty of enthusiasts have taken these Tritons and turned them into beasts with bolt-ons or even forced induction. It’s all about knowing the engine’s quirks and building on its strengths. A little TLC and these Tritons can run like champs

[@Thumper68]

@ any engine can be modded into beasts. Just cause they can be doesn’t mean they should be and we’re talking about stock form the 3 valve version were not good. The other 5.4 Tritons are much better option for everyday person.

[@AilaniMadden]

@@Thumper68 @Thumper68, I totally get where you're coming from, and you’re not wrong about the 3-valve 5.4L having its quirks. But let’s not forget, with the right upgrades, this engine can really shine. The cam phaser issues can be addressed with a good rebuild, and the spark plug design? It’s a pain, but a proper set of plugs and coils will make a world of difference. Stock, the 3-valve might not have the same punch as the 4-valve, but with some tuning, a good intake, exhaust, and maybe a blower, these things can seriously wake up.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@Thumper68, you’re absolutely right The 3-valve 5.4L Tritons had their quirks, especially in stock form, and many enthusiasts steer clear of them for daily use. Issues like cam phasers and spark plugs that seemed to have a mind of their own definitely made them challenging. The earlier 2-valve 5.4L engines are often considered more reliable, while the supercharged 5.4L (like the one in the 2003-2004 SVT Cobra "Terminator") is a beast of its own class. But here’s the beauty of American muscle: with the right mods, even an underdog engine can roar like a champ! It’s all about what you want from your ride. What’s your favorite mod or engine setup? Let us know in the comments below! Don’t forget to share your thoughts and subscribe to explore more about the legends of American Muscle Cars. Have an awesome day, and keep that passion alive

[@michaelcoonce6694]

Im a fleet manager for a large city. The 5.4s have done great for us. Now the rest especially the powerstroke i will agree with you

[@AilaniMadden]

Hey there, I respect your experience as a fleet manager and I get why the 5.4s might seem solid for work trucks or fleets, but from a muscle car enthusiast's lens, they fall short of that real "performance" DNA. Sure, they’re durable, but their horsepower around 300-350 in most configs doesn’t match the thrill of classic engines like the 428 Cobra Jet or even modern muscle options like the Coyote 5.0. And the PowerStroke? Don't get me started-it’s reliable, but where’s the fun? Muscle cars are about roaring V8s that demand attention, not just reliability.

[@michaelcoonce6694]

@AilaniMadden but the subject of the videos was trucks not performance cars

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Hey @michaelcoonce6694, thanks for sharing your experience as a fleet manager-sounds like you’ve seen these engines perform under real-world conditions! The 5.4L Triton is undoubtedly one of Ford’s workhorses, proving itself with solid reliability and torque for heavy-duty tasks. It’s the kind of engine that echoes the spirit of American engineering: rugged, reliable, and built to last. As for the PowerStroke, it’s a polarizing topic for many enthusiasts, and we hear you-some models had their hiccups, but others left their mark as diesel legends. Speaking of engines, American muscle fans love the roar of raw V8 power. From the mighty 426 HEMI to the iconic Chevy LS, these beasts defined a generation. What’s your take on muscle car engines? Share your thoughts Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe to Muscle Car Master for more engaging discussions about American automotive history. Have a great day and keep the passion alive

[@michaelcoonce6694]

@@MuscleCarMasters68 I've got several 5.4 f150 in service with 250 to 300k that run great with minimal problems. I can quote a engine replacement for a power stroke without calling the vendor. If you use a pickup for it's intended purpose keep it simple. We have several ram with hemi,the engines are fine the trucks are garbage. Not everyone wants 90k truck with 500hp As for performance cars I've had Camaro, challengers and currently a mustang. It's really brand preference because they all have positive and negative points.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@@michaelcoonce6694 Thanks for sharing your real-world insights! It’s clear you’ve got some serious experience with trucks and performance cars alike. The 5.4L Triton is a true workhorse, earning its reputation for reliability, and you're spot-on about keeping things simple-sometimes that's the key to longevity in pickups. As for the HEMI-powered Rams, it’s fascinating how the engines shine but the trucks themselves fall short for some folks. And you’re absolutely right about brand preference in muscle cars-whether it’s the Camaro, Challenger, or Mustang, each has its own legacy, strengths, and quirks. If you have more information of Muscle Cars, pls share with us too. And don’t forget to subscribe, like, and share for more American Muscle Car content. Have a fantastic day and keep cruising strong.

[@scottymoondogjakubin4766]

Im still driving a 94 s10 2.2 ! 664,450 miles on her ! Original unrebuilt engine - trans and rear end !

[@AilaniMadden]

That 2.2 in your '94 S10 has definitely earned its stripes. It's not every day you see an engine go that far without a rebuild! If you ever look to upgrade, a V8 swap could be a real game-changer. Imagine the torque and that muscle car growl

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Wow, @scottymoondogjakubin4766, that is absolutely legendary Over 664,450 miles on your '94 S10 with the original engine, transmission, and rear end? You're living proof that a well-built American machine can stand the test of time. Your S10 is a true road warrior, and it just goes to show how solid Chevy's engineering was back in the day. That 2.2-liter engine might not be the biggest powerhouse, but it’s a reliable workhorse that’s earned its stripes. Do you have any special maintenance tips or stories from all those miles? We’d love to hear more about your journey To all our viewers: what’s the highest mileage you’ve ever put on an American classic? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe, share, and join us as we celebrate the history and power of American Muscle Cars. Wishing you a fantastic day and many more miles

[@ryanj6ul]

I’ve got a 2020 F150 with the 2.7L engine, and it’s been fantastic. After 45,000 miles, it still delivers great power and torque.

[@AilaniMadden]

That 2.7L EcoBoost in your F150 is definitely a solid engine for modern trucks, but let’s be real-when we’re talking power and torque, it’s hard to beat the classics. Compare that to a muscle car legend like the Ford 428 Cobra Jet V8, cranking out 335 hp underrated by Ford, closer to 400 hp in reality and gobs of torque for tire-shredding fun.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

That’s awesome, @ryanj6ul The 2020 F-150 with the 2.7L EcoBoost is a solid machine-45,000 miles of reliable power and torque is a true testament to Ford’s engineering. That little powerhouse, with its turbocharged punch, delivers impressive performance while still being efficient for a truck. It’s a perfect blend of modern tech and capability If you’re into muscle cars, you might love hearing about how Ford’s EcoBoost tech has roots in delivering high performance with smaller engines, similar to the philosophy behind classic American muscle. From the roaring V8s of the past to today’s turbocharged marvels, it’s all part of the evolution of American performance. Everyone, drop a comment below about your favorite engines or muscle car stories! Don’t forget to share this with other enthusiasts, and make sure to subscribe to American Muscle Cars for more epic content. Wishing you a fantastic day

[@Thumper68]

Absolutely nothing wrong with 5.3 ls engine. 3000 mile oil changes at 180k miles doesn’t burn any oil and runs like it did the first day. If you city drive them just run in manual mode and the afm system won’t turn on and if you live in the country it just doesn’t ever turn on highway driving.

[@CookeZachery]

Hey @Thumper68, gotta respectfully disagree, my friend! The 5.3 LS is reliable, no doubt, but it’s not perfect. The AFM system can cause lifter failure over time, and even if you’re avoiding it in manual mode, it’s still a weak link. Plus, 3000-mile oil changes are great for longevity, but the 5.3 LS was tuned for efficiency, not raw muscle. If you’re talking real muscle car performance, we’re in 400+ HP big block territory or a high-compression small block screaming past 6,000 RPM. LS engines are solid, but they’re a tool, not a passion piece like classic muscle mills.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@Thumper68, you're absolutely right-there's nothing wrong with the 5.3 LS engine It's a testament to GM's engineering that your engine still runs like new after 180k miles. That kind of reliability is what muscle car fans dream of! Your tip about using manual mode to bypass AFM in city driving is pure gold-keeping that V8 roar alive where it belongs. On the open highway, letting the engine stretch its legs is exactly how these machines are meant to be driven. The LS platform has been a favorite for muscle car enthusiasts and racers alike, thanks to its durability, power, and insane mod potential. Got a favorite LS swap story? Let us know in the comments! Everyone, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to keep celebrating American Muscle Cars. Let’s keep the rumble alive and rolling Have a fantastic day, and see you on the road

[@Thumper68]

@@CookeZachery yeah of course I know this I’m currently building an 010 block .060 over wiseco pistons 6” scat rods, custom 43 pound 3.75” stroke crank. This is going to take the place of my numbers matching 350 in my 68 RS/SS Camaro Muncie 4 speed all original car 110k miles. I don’t want to blow up the original engine so it’s going on an engine stand in plastic. This new build should make well north of 500 with ease and rev super quick dropping 13 pounds from stock crank to mine.

[@Thumper68]

@@MuscleCarMasters68 I’m a gen 1 guy really it’s my first memories way back in early 80s through early 90s helping my old man build 421 sbc that were for late model dirt cars making 750+ hp 9k rpm instant revving pure methanol monsters! I took my Camaro down to steal went through the entire thing all while healing from a broke left shoulder blade seven broke ribs on left side and a cut spleen and going through chemo fighting cancer for the first time. Hit a deer on a dirt bike in PNW at about 70 mph it was dead sprint when I t-boned it. Deer saved my life I’d never known I had stage 3 cancer if it wasn’t for that. Doctor said my blood work was perfect and I was 6’4” 240 lbs solid and by time I realized I was sick it would of been way to late. I kept the bike running even though I was unconscious 🤣

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@@Thumper68 what a killer build you’ve got going! An .010 block .060 over with Wiseco pistons, Scat rods, and a custom 43-pound crank? That’s a recipe for one beast of an engine! Dropping 13 pounds from the crank is going to make that 350 scream like a banshee-it’ll rev like a dream and easily push past 500 horsepower. Respect for preserving the numbers-matching engine in your ‘68 RS/SS Camaro-that's true dedication to keeping the soul of a classic alive. A Muncie 4-speed, all-original with 110k miles? That’s muscle car history right there Let us know how this beast turns out once it’s on the road. have an awesome day!

[@Thumper68]

The atlas engine family is actually pretty strong definitely not one of the worst ever.

[@CookeZachery]

The Atlas engine family, while reliable in some applications, doesn't hold a candle to the legends of American performance engines. It was designed more for utility and efficiency, not raw power. Take the 4.2L I6, for instance, 275 hp and 275 lb-ft are decent, but compare that to the Ford 300 I6 or the Chevy 250 straight-six for torque and durability in similar roles. When it comes to muscle, Atlas isn’t in the same league as the iconic big blocks or high-revving small blocks that define American performance. Just my 2 cents

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

@Thumper68 You’re spot on about the Atlas engine family! It’s often underrated, but the 4.2L inline-six, especially, is no slouch. It’s built strong, with a robust iron block and forged internals that give it a solid foundation. In fact, when tuned right, these engines can hold their own in terms of both power and durability, especially in trucks like the Chevy TrailBlazer. While it's not a V8 powerhouse, it’s a workhorse that’s known for longevity and reliability. Definitely not the worst engine, and I’d take it over some of the newer, more finicky designs any day...

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@Thumper68 The Atlas engine family is underrated and has proven its strength over the years. While it might not have the legendary status of a big-block V8, it’s a solid workhorse. Fun fact: the 4.2L inline-six, known as the Vortec 4200, was a trailblazer in its time, featuring dual overhead cams and variable valve timing-tech that wasn’t common in American engines then. It brought a good balance of power and efficiency, especially in SUVs like the Trailblazer. But hey, muscle car fans, what do you think? Could the Atlas engine family have been developed into something iconic for performance vehicles? Drop your thoughts below! And while you're here, hit that like button, share your insights with the community, and don’t forget to subscribe for more muscle car history, engine breakdowns, and good ol' American horsepower Wishing you a fantastic day

[@Thumper68]

@ Calvin over at Nivlac57 has proven the 4200 is a badass ass platform his new all American Supra made with the 5th gen Camaro and 1000hp twin turbo 4200. The platform still has much more to give and is just now starting to get aftermarket support. In 5 more years I think it may surpass the 2jz with its sheer displacement advantage. It will be interesting to see how it goes. I have an 04 trailblazer with 192k miles and it still runs real strong. It will probably get a turbo at some point to make a nice little street sleeper. Some more fun facts: The atlas 4200 won at pikes peak in 2000 and ran the Baja 500 and 1000 as well. It was also the first GM truck with drive by wire throttle.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@@Thumper68 Yes.... Calvin at Nivlac57 is really showing us the untapped potential of the 4200! A 1000hp twin-turbo setup in a 5th-gen Camaro-based "All-American Supra"? That’s legendary the Atlas 4200 is proving it’s not just a workhorse-it’s a serious performance platform with a lot left to give. The idea of it surpassing the iconic 2JZ with its displacement advantage is a bold claim, but one we’d love to see unfold in the next 5 years. Your ’04 Trailblazer sounds like a hidden gem! A turbo on that would make for one wicked street sleeper-keep us updated on your build. And props to the 4200 for conquering Pikes Peak and the Baja races-true engineering greatness. Have a great day!

[@walterbrooken1722]

yes a Ford 5.4 from the factory had problems out of the Box had problems ford could not solve they said it would be cheaper to by a new engine then to fix the problem i said what for the price i just paid ended up buying new motor and i made it better than new carzy Right i know B.S. never again will this happen 4SHO Reserach Before Buying that why old school still wins

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@walterbrooken1722 - You’re absolutely right The 5.4L Triton had its share of factory flaws, from spark plug issues to timing chain troubles, and Ford's "replace instead of repair" approach frustrated many loyal fans. It’s crazy to think that even after paying top dollar, you'd need to invest in a new engine to truly get what you deserved in the first place. But hats off to you for turning that frustration into a win-making your engine better than factory new? That’s the kind of determination that makes old-school enthusiasts proud! This is exactly why we love old-school muscle cars: simple, powerful, and built to last. No unnecessary headaches-just pure American performance. What do you think, everyone? Share your thoughts below! Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share for more muscle car history and insights. Wishing you a great day and lots of miles of smiles

[@AdelynDodson]

Hey man, I hear ya on frustrations with modern engines, but I gotta disagree about lumping all the 5.4s together. The 5.4L Triton had its quirks, especially with spark plugs and cam phasers in the early years, but not every one of them was doomed. Plenty of folks hit 200k+ miles with proper care. Old school is awesome-no argument there-but modern engines bring insane power potential with the right mods. For example, the 5.4 supercharged in the Shelby GT500 cranked 500+ hp from the factory

[@AilaniMadden]

I totally get where you're coming from, man. The Ford 5.4 was a mess for sure, especially when they couldn't even fix the issues properly. It's crazy that you ended up getting a new motor and making it better than factory

[@JerryHelton-zo7dg]

2004 5.4 3 valve Ford Larait. 102,000 miles. Changed the plugs at 77,000 miles. Definitely was not a fun job. Truck runs perfectly.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

That’s awesome, @JerryHelton-zo7dg Your 2004 5.4L 3-valve Ford Lariat is a solid workhorse and a great representation of Ford’s reliable engineering from that era. The Triton V8 might not be the easiest engine to work on (those spark plugs are notorious), but it’s worth the effort to keep your truck running strong. At 102,000 miles, it sounds like your Lariat still has a lot of life left in it-these engines are known to clock high mileage with proper care. Ford enthusiasts love how the 5.4 combines power and durability, making it a favorite among F-Series fans. Muscle car and truck fans-what’s your experience with the 5.4 Triton or your go-to V8 engine? Share your stories below! Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe to dive deeper into the world of American Muscle Cars. Let’s keep the passion alive! Wishing you a great day, Jerry

[@JerryHelton-zo7dg]

@MuscleCarMasters68 After the exhaust, I bought the Diablo Sport ll hand held programmer. WOW!!! Truck seems like it has twice the power. Like night and day difference. Yeah I went full "DIABLO" tune. Gotta run 93 octane...it's well worth it.😎✌️

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@@JerryHelton-zo7dg That’s incredible, @JerryHelton-zo7dg The combination of the Diablo Sport II tuner and your exhaust upgrade sounds like a match made in horsepower heaven. That 5.4L Triton V8 must roar now, especially with the full "DIABLO" tune and 93 octane coursing through it. Talk about waking up a beast-night and day difference is right! The 5.4 is already a legend for its reliability and torque, and with the right tuning, it really shows its muscle. Ford trucks like your Lariat prove why they’re icons in the truck world. Keep those engines roaring, and have an awesome day, Jerry

[@JerryHelton-zo7dg]

@@MuscleCarMasters68 Thank you my friend. By the way...the old Ford has a factory 3.55 posi.😎

[@buidth0]

i’ve had two trucks with the 2.7l ecoboost, and both were absolutely outstanding…

[@kirkkrieger9360]

I've heard nothing but good things about the 2.7 Ecoboost.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

That’s awesome to hear, @buidth0 The 2.7L EcoBoost really is an engineering marvel-compact yet powerful, delivering great torque and fuel efficiency. Ford knocked it out of the park with this engine! Did you know that this twin-turbo V6 was designed to handle tough jobs while still offering the smooth performance you'd expect from a daily driver? It’s a modern powerhouse that proves small displacement engines can pack a serious punch. What trucks were they in? F-150, Ranger, or something else? We’d love to hear more about your experiences! If you're a fan of engines like the EcoBoost or just love seeing how modern tech blends with muscle, this is the channel for you. Drop a comment below to share your favorite engine stories or truck memories And don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to keep the American muscle car legacy alive. Have a fantastic day

[@richjames1595]

I had a 4.7 HO in a jeep great motor no issues. I have a 6.1 SRT8 in a Wk jeep now and it's great but I miss the comfort of the Wj.

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

The 4.7 HO was a solid motor for its time, but as a muscle car fan, I’ve seen it struggle with longevity. Common issues like valve seat failures, sludge buildup, and cracked heads weren’t rare.

[@richjames1595]

@@KeithGreene-k1v Yeah I believe your correct just regular maintenance probably helped, I went out of my way to get a 6.1 (not common in new zealand) not interested in the 6.4 too many issues from what i have read.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@richjames1595 Wow, Rich, it sounds like you've got an incredible history with some legendary powerplants The 4.7 HO is indeed a solid motor-Jeep nailed that balance of reliability and performance. As for the 6.1 SRT8, you're rocking one of the most iconic HEMI engines out there. The WK Jeep paired with the 6.1 is an absolute beast, and I completely understand missing the comfort of the WJ-it’s hard to beat that classic blend of luxury and toughness. You’re spot on about maintenance being key to keeping these engines running strong. Going out of your way to snag a 6.1 in New Zealand? That’s dedication! And yeah, the 6.4 has had its share of mixed reviews, so sticking with the tried-and-true 6.1 sounds like a smart move. Everyone, share your favorite HEMI moments in the comments Don’t forget to like, subscribe, and share. Have a fantastic day

[@bombardoniklaus]

the new gm trucks are facing lifter issues too, but now it’s happening across all the cylinders instead of just some.

[@AilaniMadden]

The lifter issues in GM trucks aren’t entirely new-it’s been a hot topic with their AFM and DFM systems for years. But here’s the kicker: the problem isn’t as widespread as some make it seem. It’s often linked to maintenance habits or oil choices. Plus, GM’s newer engines like the L87 6.2L V8 still deliver a solid 420 hp and 460 lb-ft of torque with impressive durability when cared for right.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Hey @bombardoniklaus You’re absolutely right-those lifter issues on the new GM trucks are a hot topic among gearheads lately. It’s a shame because GM trucks have always been known for their rugged performance and reliability. This widespread issue, happening across all cylinders now, seems to point to some design or manufacturing flaws that GM should address ASAP. For those of us who love American engineering, it’s frustrating to see these hiccups in such iconic machines. Wishing you an awesome day

[@jasonhooey5677]

I really dislike videos like this. A lot of false info, you can't get oil sludge with oil changes every 5 to 6000km oil changes. Even under towing applications. You get sludge by using cheap oil, contamination or prolonged oil change intervals (manufacturers recommend oil change intervals)

[@CookeZachery]

No...Even with regular oil changes, engines like the Chevy 396 or Ford 428, known for running hot, could still see sludge if ventilation wasn’t ideal or if older oils broke down. High loads like towing could amplify it. Modern oils are better, but back then, oil quality varied.

[@jasonhooey5677]

@CookeZachery both problems are solved by changing the oil sooner. If you can't understand that there's not much helping you understand

[@CookeZachery]

@@jasonhooey5677 Hey there, I gotta disagree with you on this one. Regular oil changes definitely help, but engines like the Chevy 396 or Ford 428-both beasts in their day-had unique challenges. These big blocks ran hot, and if the crankcase ventilation wasn’t up to par, sludge could build up even with fresh oil. Plus, older oils didn’t have the heat tolerance or detergents we take for granted now. Throw in heavy loads or spirited driving, and that oil could break down fast. Modern oils are far superior, but back then, it wasn’t just about frequency-it was about the limits of the oil itself.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@jasonhooey5677 Thanks for sharing your thoughts proper maintenance, using high-quality oil, and sticking to appropriate oil change intervals are critical to avoiding sludge issues. American muscle cars, with their high-performance engines, demand that kind of care to keep them roaring down the road! Whether it’s a classic big-block V8 or a modern muscle car powerhouse, treating your engine with respect ensures it delivers the performance and reliability we all love. That said, different driving conditions-like heavy towing or extreme weather-can stress even the best-maintained engines, which is why some folks prefer to go beyond manufacturer recommendations. It’s all about knowing your car and giving it the attention it deserves. What’s your go-to muscle car maintenance tip? Let us know in the comments! Don’t forget to subscribe, like, and share to keep celebrating the heart-pounding legacy of American Muscle Cars. Have a fantastic day, Jason

[@jameswallace7351]

I wish I'd have known about the 5.3 GM issue before I bought my 2012 GM should have learned that this 8-6-4 cut out of cyclender cut back doesn't work they tried it on the Cadillac engines it didn't work then and apparently doesn't work now I've just got to pray the engine last long enough for me to get it paid down enough that I can get rid of it

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@jameswallace7351 Thanks for sharing your experience, James! The 5.3L engine with the cylinder deactivation (AFM) feature has certainly sparked a lot of debate. You’re absolutely right-GM did try a similar approach with the Cadillac V8-6-4 in the early '80s, and it faced similar reliability issues. While the idea of saving fuel sounded great, the execution just wasn’t up to muscle car standards. These engines often encounter lifter failure, oil consumption issues, and uneven wear, which is frustrating for any car enthusiast. To keep your engine running longer, consider disabling the AFM system with a tuner, as many have found success with that fix. What do you think? Let us know in the comments For everyone else out there, what’s been your experience with GM engines? Share your thoughts below, subscribe to the channel, and join us as we explore the highs and lows of American muscle Have a great day

[@CookeZachery]

@jameswallace7351 Man, I hear you on the frustration, but I gotta push back a bit on the "8-6-4 doesn't work" take. Sure, GM's original 8-6-4 system from the '80s Cadillacs was a bust, but modern cylinder deactivation like AFM or DFM is a different animal. The real issue here isn’t the concept-it’s the execution. Those lifters in the 5.3 LS-based engines have been a known weak point, especially when maintenance gets skipped or the engine gets pushed hard. If GM had stuck with beefier lifters and better oiling strategies, this tech could shine. Classic LS durability is still there, though.

[@jameswallace7351]

@CookeZachery I agree with you on this but my thing is that they should have done a lot more testing on the parts everything I've been able to find on it says it's the lifters that's the weak point and I haven't found anything about anyone making better lifters to replace them and from what I've found eliminating this system is pretty expensive and just repairing the issue is expensive too I'm just hoping that the maintenance was preformed well before I got it I know that the 5.3 engines that didn't have this are really good engines it's just crazy that something as simple as better parts would fix the problem

[@BlowmoldGuy123]

My 2012 Silverado 5.3 with AFM just turned 200k miles with zero problems.

[@jameswallace7351]

@BlowmoldGuy123 that's great I'm hoping mine will get at least that but I'm hoping for more I'm sure regular oil changes and how you drive has a lot to do with it

[@CJColvin]

The worst truck engines are obviously the 5.4L SOHC Triton V8 and of course both the 2.7L and 3.5L Ecoboost engines.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Hey @CJColvin The 5.4L SOHC Triton V8 and the Ecoboost engines have definitely sparked heated debates among enthusiasts! The Triton, for example, was notorious for spark plug issues and cam phaser problems, frustrating many owners. Meanwhile, the Ecoboost engines, while offering impressive power and efficiency, have had critics pointing out carbon buildup in the direct injection systems and turbo reliability concerns. But let’s not forget - these engines are part of Ford’s continuous evolution, pushing boundaries between power, efficiency, and innovation. Every engine has its pros and cons, but they’ve paved the way for some fantastic advancements in today’s vehicles. Have an awesome day, CJ

[@CookeZachery]

The 5.4L SOHC Triton V8, while tough, just didn't have the performance to match what real truck enthusiasts expect. It was underpowered for its size, especially when Ford was pushing bigger trucks. And as for the 2.7L and 3.5L EcoBoost engines, don’t get me started - they’re turbocharged, but they just don’t have the raw, unfiltered power that a true muscle car enthusiast craves.

[@mrt6897]

Showing a 22r-e a 4cyl when discussion was about 3vz v6?

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Hey @mrt6897, great catch there You're absolutely right about the 22R-E being a 4-cylinder, and we were discussing the 3VZ V6. That mix-up is on us, and we really appreciate sharp-eyed enthusiasts like you who keep us on point. The 3VZ V6, with its head gasket issues, certainly earned its spot on that "worst engines" list. But let’s be real-when we think about the power and spirit of muscle cars and trucks, the focus shifts to engines that roar with authority, like the iconic V8s that ruled the streets For all you muscle car fans out there, what's your favorite engine that defined an era? Share your thoughts below, and let’s hear from the community! Don’t forget to like, comment, and subscribe for more American Muscle Car content. Thanks for keeping the passion alive, and have a great day

[@lelandcarlson1668]

2015 F150 owner here with the 2.7 Ecoboost V6. I'm at over 80,000 miles and have not experienced any of the issues described in this video. Not sure where this guy is getting his information from, but everyone I know with a 1st generation 2.7 has been very happy with it. Great performance and good fuel economy. The guy that does the KZbin channel "I do Cars" had trouble finding a failed 2.7 to do a tear down on. Oil changes every 5,000 miles or less with full synthetic is the key to keeping these engines happy. Only nit pic I have with the engine is that eventually I'll have to de-carbonize the intake valves, but no indication of power loss or rough running yet.

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

@lelandcarlson1668 I totally agree with you, man. I've had my share of experience with the 2.7 Ecoboost, and it's been a solid engine for sure. The performance and fuel efficiency are on point, especially when you're hauling or towing. You’re right, regular oil changes with synthetic are crucial-keeps the engine running smooth. As for the carbon buildup, it's definitely something to watch out for in the long run, but if you keep up with the maintenance, it’ll last. Overall, the 2.7 has been pretty reliable. It’s like maintaining a classic muscle car, take care of it, and it’ll reward you.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@lelandcarlson1668 Thanks for sharing your experience with the 2.7 Ecoboost V6-it’s great to hear from someone putting serious miles on their F150! At over 80,000 miles, it sounds like you're proving just how solid these engines can be with the right care. You nailed it-regular oil changes with full synthetic are absolutely key to longevity. That 2.7 might not be a V8, but it packs solid performance and great fuel economy, making it a favorite among many truck owners. As for the de-carbonizing, it's a common challenge with direct injection engines, but it's good to hear you’re not seeing any performance issues yet. These engines have earned respect in the community for their reliability when well-maintained. What’s your take on how the 2.7 compares to some of Ford's bigger engines? Let us know! Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe for more American Muscle Car content. Have a great day

[@johnb1658]

MESSED UP YOUR EDITING! You went from introducing the 6.4 power stoke to talking about the Dodge 4.6 and then back to power stoke oil dilution???

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Hey @johnb1658, thanks for pointing that out We appreciate your sharp eye for detail-it’s fans like you who keep us on our toes and striving for perfection. To clear things up, the editing glitch might’ve thrown off the flow, but let’s set the record straight: the 6.4L Power Stroke is a beast, known for its power and durability (despite its oil dilution issues). On the other hand, the Dodge 4.6, while smaller, has its own legacy among Mopar fans. Both engines have unique strengths that make them stand out in their respective worlds of power and performance. What do you think? Any personal favorites between the two? Drop your thoughts in the comments, and let’s get the discussion rolling Wishing you an awesome day and happy cruising

[@joevara1349]

How about turning up the volume when you're doing your videos? You can barely hear it

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@joevara1349 Thanks for the feedback, Joe We appreciate you letting us know about the volume issue-your input helps us fine-tune our videos for the best experience. Rest assured, we'll crank up the volume for future uploads so you can enjoy every detail without missing a beat. Speaking of sound, there’s nothing like the roar of a high-performance muscle car engine! Whether it’s a HEMI, a small block, or a big block powerhouse, the sound is as iconic as the cars themselves. What’s your favorite muscle car engine sound? Let us know in the comments And hey, if you’re a fan of muscle cars, make sure to check out our channel for more videos celebrating the legends of American horsepower. Don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe to join the conversation and keep the nostalgia alive. Have a great day, and keep the muscle car spirit strong

[@froginasock8782]

"Truck..."

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Thanks for your input, @froginasock8782 It sounds like you're pointing out that the title could be clearer for true truck fans. You're absolutely right-the video focuses on the 10 worst pickup truck engines specifically, and we should make that crystal clear. Pickup trucks have their own unique legacy in American automotive history, with engines that have shaped the workhorse image we know and love. Whether it's a V8 powerhouse or a rare underperformer, they’ve all played a part in the story of American engineering. What’s your take on the worst pickup truck engine of all time? Let us know in the comments! And for all American muscle car and truck fans, don't forget to like, share, and subscribe to keep the passion alive. Stay tuned for more epic content, and have an awesome day....

[@marcelgaud]

Dude, you begin speaking about the Ford '07-12,,,,, 6.4 Superduty.....yet you then begin speaking of/about and showing Dodge, and Jeeps?????????? Do some better editing.

[@KeithGreene-k1v]

The 6.4L might claim 350 hp and 650 lb-ft torque, but that power meant nothing when it kept breaking down. A buddy of mine spent thousands fixing his Super Duty before finally switching to a Cummins.

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

@marcelgaud We truly appreciate you taking the time to point this out-it’s fans like you who help us grow and improve! You're absolutely right, the editing could have been tighter to ensure we stayed focused on the Ford '07-'12 6.4 Superduty. Sometimes, when discussing broader contexts or comparing with other brands, we unintentionally shift focus, but we’ll work hard to keep the spotlight where it belongs next time. Let’s hear from everyone else too: What are your thoughts on the 6.4 Superduty? Wishing you a fantastic day

[@MuscleCarMasters68]

Hey @KeithGreene-k1v, thanks for sharing your experience! The 6.4L Power Stroke definitely had its challenges, especially with reliability. Those early emissions systems caused a lot of headaches for owners, and you're right-Cummins engines have earned their reputation for being bulletproof. Ford eventually learned their lesson, stepping up their game with later engines like the 6.7L Power Stroke, which balanced power and dependability much better. Have a great day