#13. बौद्ध दर्शन: शून्यवाद (माध्यमिक सम्प्रदाय) ॥ Shunyawada, UPSC Philosophy Optional in hindi

[@SanjibSamantray1]

prabal ji please continue. Because there is no one like you to teach boudha, jaina,... or other Philosophies in India. kindly give us your knowledge through further videos. You will be remembered as a great KZbin teacher. thank you.

[@Rajsingh09748]

Sara indian philosophy pdh liya pr aaj shunyawaad ka actual mean smjh me aaya.... Dhanyavaad sir

[@umakantgairola7726]

बहुत बढ़िया जी। जगत परिवर्तनशील सत्य है। इसी जगत में रह कर इसी परिवर्तनशील पन्चभौतिक शरीर से निर्वाण की प्राप्ति होती है।। ब्रम्हसत्य जगतमिथ्या तर्कसंगत नहीं है। इसी जगत में सशरीर रहते हैं। भोजन खाते है। पानी पीते हैं। तो जगत पूर्णतः असत्य या मिथ्या कैसे हो सकता है। ब्रम्हसत्य जगदपिसत्यं आपेक्षिकम् ब्रम्हसत्य है और यह पंचभौतिक जगत परिवर्तनशील है। यही तर्कसंगत है।

[@beinghonest5539]

Nice video explain..... From Maharashtra❤

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thanks a lot 😊

[@sureshbhagat7382]

शुन्य का किसी भी भाषा या शब्द मे वर्णन करना ऊचित नही है /कर ही नहीं सकते, ईसका केवल और केवल शुनयता में जाकर अनुभव ले सकते हैं, ईसके लिए तुमे पहले संपूरण तया भीतर तथा बाहर शुन्य होना पडेगा जहॉ सॉंस भी थम जाती है, परंतु अलौकिक भीतर तथा बाहरी संपुरण जाग बना रहता है. भगवान बुद्ध का एक ही मार्ग हैं जिसके सहारे सहारे साधक वहॉ तक पहुंचने मे कामयाब होता ही है, साहस, त्याग, जिते जी मर मिटने का साक्षी भाव अत्यंत आवश्यक है. नमो बुदधाय नमो धमाय नमो संघाय 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹🌹👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷🌷

[@shalinichandravanshi4132]

Aap philosophy ke sabse best teacher ho

[@studyduniyaofficial948]

प्रबल जी 🙏आपने कहा उपनिषदों में ब्रम्ह के लिए नेती नेती शब्द का प्रयोग हुआ किन्तु कठोपनिषद में इति इति शब्द प्रयुक्त है l

[@dayashankersingh6481]

Gyanvardhak ,very good.

[@vikrant6802]

Excellent sir

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thankyou

[@sujatapramila]

बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद सर। आपने इतने जटिल विषय को बहुत ही सरलता से समझाया। बहुत बढ़िया 🙏🙏

[@DarshanikBharat]

आपका धन्यवाद

[@drakengarddrake1816]

Prachhann budhh, shankar ne budhh ke vichar churaye hai

[@manoramajain244]

दाठा वंस का वीडियो चाहिए है । सर आप बहुत अच्छा पढ़ाते हैं

[@mayankagnihotri2780]

गुरू गोरख ने भी शुन्य की बात की है और कबीर दास ने भी अपनी वाणी मे इसका जिक्र किया है

[@k.m.nandan.bauddh5139]

बहुत सुंदर प्रस्तुति किया सरजी आप नें सुन कर बहुत अच्छा लगा और एक नया मार्ग मिला शून्य वाद से

[@sarojmavani8439]

Hi Thanks a million ,I am obliged for explanation. S.K.M.Kenya.

[@rabuaambedkar324]

परिवर्तन संसार का नियम है। निश्चिय ही यह सोचने वाली बात है, कि कुदरत की सबसे अद्बभुत रचना 'मनुष्य' है। हर बीतते युग के साथ मनुष्य की बुद्धि का विकास हुआ है। क्या दुःख, अशान्ति व चिंता भोगने ही मनुष्य संसार में आता है? महामानव बुद्ध एवं महामानव डॉ. आंबेडकर के जीवनदर्शन से मुझे प्रेरणा मिली है, कि "बुद्धिज्म महान सामाजिक दर्शन है, जो कही भी तथा प्रत्येक जगह पर अपनाया जा सकता है"। महामानव डॉ. आंबेडकर के "कई कानून और कई समाधान" मुझे स्वीकार है, सोच मेरी निरंतर सकारात्मक है सत्य, अहिंसा और शांति मेरी दुनिया है। The Indian Constitution will be adopted and the nation will be liberated. 'भारतीय संविधान' आधुनिक महाशक्ति के साथ - साथ राष्ट्र का जीवन खून है। डॉ. आंबेडकर सृष्टि व सत्य का वो सूर्य है, जिसने 'भारतीय संविधान' में मानवीय जीवन के साथ - साथ जीवजंतु, पेड़ - पौधों को भी जीवन जीने का अधिकार दिया है। 'डॉ. आंबेडकरवाद' प्यार - पढ़ाई से भी अत्यधिक आवश्यक व महत्वपूर्ण "जीवनजीने--जीवनमरण" का प्रकृतिवादी, मानवतावादी, विज्ञानवादी महानतम रिसर्च है, जो दृढ़ संकल्प है। आंबेडकरिज्म अपनाएंगे - मानव अधिकार पाएंगे ! संविधान अपनाएंगे - राष्ट्र की उन्नति पाएंगे !! बुद्धिज्म अपनाएंगे - मानव मुक्ति पाएंगे !!! बुद्धआंबेडकरवादी एक चिंतनशील लेखक -- रबुआ अंबेडकर

[@rampraveshkumarbharati6311]

thanks pleas aur indian aur western philosophy ka video uplead kare🙏🙏

[@jeetsingh6835]

Crystal clear❤️❤️

[@munnakumarjha433]

very nice teacher of philosophy optional paper .

[@rajaneekantpatel2762]

बहुत-बहुत धन्यवाद सर आपने बहुत अच्छी जानकारी, अगर आपके ग्रुप में राजनीति दार्शनिक का लेक्चर हो तो प्लीज अपलोड करें

[@DarshanikBharat]

धन्यवाद

[@rajpal2034]

This video is very very beneficial for me.

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thank you

[@ajaisrivastava988]

आपको स्वयं में आत्म विश्वास लाना होगा

[@kavishmishra4245]

Maja aa gaya🙏

[@kanhayalalmulchandani693]

Very Nice video Thank you so much 🙏

[@urmilasahoo254]

I'm also waiting for other videos for rest three schools of Buddhism 💞.Thank You☺

[@DarshanikBharat]

Videos milengi jaldi he

[@urmilasahoo254]

@@DarshanikBharat Thank you 🤭

[@runurouth7596]

It's a great explanation..thank you so much❤❤❤

[@asisjana3175]

Thank you sir ❤

[@SHAILESHKumar-hf3ni]

Very nice explanation

[@Srkt6]

Aisa ek hi bat hai jise hum buddhi se samaj nahi sakte or o hai "nothingness " or nothing things ka Karan nahi hota.

[@roziparween1877]

Good evening sir As always this video was also very good ,awesome but a very long video was just thinking that it is complete now I have seen this video last night but couldn't complete finally it has completed now Lot of thanks Sir ..

[@DarshanikBharat]

Good eve Rozi.. Thankyou

[@roziparween1877]

Darshanik Bharat ?????

[@kunalgupta4898]

Prabal sir. In upsc and psc there is limitation of word for particular question. Here it is long explanation of this theory. Can u set some example so that I can understand and write about question in stipulated word...

[@DarshanikBharat]

Why not... I'll surely do something for such problems. Generally, fundamentals are general answers for every particular question. Pata nhi ye kitna sahi kaha maine.

[@hirendrayadav1330]

Grt information sir ...thank you

[@anuraia758]

Sir pls a.j ayer ki book language truth and logic ka chapter 3(nature of philosophical analysis) ka video provide kar dijiye for Hindi medium student if possible in 1 or two days🥺🥺 aur agar possible ho to 1 week me chapter 1 ,2 and 4 + introduction bhi upload kar dijiye kuchh samjh nhi aata sir book padhne ke baad bhi🥺🥺pls sir🙏🙏

[@Ajaysingh-bt9vp]

Buddham sharnam gacchami dhammam sharnam gacchami shangham sharnam gacchami 🇸🇨🇸🇨🇸🇨🇸🇨🇸🇨🇸🇨🇸🇨🇸🇨🇸🇨🇸🇨

[@DarshanikBharat]

Buddha ko naman❤️🙏

[@rukmanisingh7420]

tq so much sirji...ausum lecture

[@DarshanikBharat]

Wlcm

[@jigneshshah990900]

As per quantum physics quantum partical has number of state at a one time and it can be stable at the time of viewing by viewers. Means sat and asat both are possible so sadasat of sunyavad goes wrong

[@crazydeals7825]

Great explanation sir ji.... Plz jaldi se pura syllabus finish kar dijiye....😃😃😃😃

[@DarshanikBharat]

Jaldi complete ho juga syllabus

[@mahanadi-patelsirneetphysi7200]

pratity.... jab karya karan ki shrikhla ka varnan karta hain to kya shuny (avarnaniy) ka bhi varnan kar sakta hai , yadi ha to , shunya ko avarnaniy kyo kaha apne, yadi nahi to pratity....... ek prakar ka shuny kyo ho jayega.

[@TheYellowshuttle]

Very nice & systematic introduction of dependent concepts.👌 Examples of the 3rd & 4th possibilities of a Chatushkoti would have been great. Can you make a separate video on Chatushkoti?

[@vinaykumarrai5809]

Sir vigyanvad Philosophy pr video panaye please 🙏🙏

[@dakeshwarsahu7112]

Thank you mahodai ji

[@DarshanikBharat]

Wlcm

[@radhiyaprajapati4323]

thanks sir please provide other part also

[@bloodshedthehuman]

DEBUNKING SOME MYTHS AND MISCONCEPTIONS PREVALENT IN INDIAN SUB-CONTINENT ABOUT BUDDHA DHARMA "A corollary to the above misconception is that the Buddha actually taught what was in the Vedas but his disciples either did not understand his teaching or distorted them. An aspect of the above mentioned misconception has already been shown as totally absurd. But there is another aspect which needs to be dealt with. As the Buddha's immediate disciples had experienced in their own mental continuum what the Buddha meant, there could not possibly have been any distortion. And as the living enlightened lineages continue to date, which means that each generation experienced in their mental continuum, the exact meaning of the Buddha's teachings, to claim that the Buddhists distorted the Buddha's teachings and that's why it has become so different from the Vedic teachings, is the height of naivety. And this brings us to another similar misconception about Buddhism. Most Hindu scholars, or otherwise, would like to believe that the Buddhism is a branch of Hinduism. This misunderstanding is rampant amongst educated Hindus and is a correlate of the story fabricated in the 16th century and later in the Shiva Purana and its likes, that the Buddha was an incarnation of Visnu. First of all Hinduism as it is known today did not exist at the time of the Buddha, so there can be no question about Buddhism being a branch of Hinduism. In fact, according to historical records and anthropological studies, what we call Hinduism is 75% derived from Buddhism and is the offspring of the impact of Buddhism on the Brahmanic system. What existed in the Buddha's time was a form of Brahmanism that was quite different from what is known as Hinduism today. From ancient times there were two streams of spiritual quest in the Indian sub-continent. One was Sramanism and the other was Vedic Brahmanism. These two streams did interact with each other as is seen clearly in the Upanishads of the Brahmanic systems and the sutras of the Buddhists and Jains who were both members of the sramanic system. It should be kept in mind that both the Buddha and Mahavir called themselves Mahasramans, which is a clear indication that they did not subscribe to the Brahmanic systems. In one of the most famous mantras of Buddhism 'ye dharma hetu prabaha hetustathagato hyevadat tesancha yo nirodho evam badi mahasramana, Aswajit, the famous Brahmin disciple of the Buddha called the Buddha Mahasramana. Sramanism was probably older than the Vedic Brahmanism that, according to many historians came into India when the Indo-Aryans transmigrated into the Indian sub-continent, from Central Asia. But there are many who do not agree to this view. However, Sramanism is definitely an indigenous spiritual tradition of the Indian subcontinent, and there is no two thoughts about this. We see the transactions between the Sramans and Brahmins in the Brihadaranyak Upanishad 3.6.1 where we find Gargi (who is often vaunted as the daughter of Nepal) challenging the Brahmin Yagyavalkya. We know that Gargi was a Sraman by the fact that she stuck a twig of the rose-apple (Jambu tree) as a sign of challenge. And also the style of questioning of Gargi is a shade different from the questions put forth by the many other Brahmins in that same text. The Brihadaranyak is thought to be at least 2-3 hundred years older than the Buddha if not older. So Sramanism was an equally old (if not older) stream of spiritual system as Brahmanism and the Buddha has clearly called himself Mahasraman. This would clearly imply that Buddhism is definitely not an off-shoot of Brahmanism, what to speak of Hinduism which is a product of Brahmanism's interaction with Buddhism and thus something that developed in the Indian sub-continent after the Buddha. We could give scholastic quotes to validate this but it's not necessary in an article like this. Vedic Brahmanism metamorphosed drastically due to the catalytic influence of Buddhism and others and became the multifarious system under the generic name of Hinduism. But of course, we cannot say that Buddhism was not influenced by Vedic Brahmanism and later Hinduism at all. That would be too naïve. However, in the give and take which is inevitable in any culture within a space of time (and Buddhism covered 75% of India and 75% Asia for sixteen or so hundred years), it was Hinduism which took mostly from Buddhism and not the other way around. Another interrelated myth is that it was Sankaracharya who defeated the Buddhists all over India and that is how Buddhism vanished from India, or as the former President of India Dr. Radhakrishnan Sarvapulli put it, Hinduism embraced Buddhism and in the process killed it. Again these are myths running wild amongst Hindus of the Indian sub-continent; but they do not have any historical validity. This notion is given further credence to Nepalese, including Buddhist Newars by the Newari legend that Sankaracharya came to Nepal and defeated all the Buddhists, converted the kings and beheaded the Bhikchhus. First of all the Adi Sankaracharya was around the 7th century and great Mahavihars like Nalanda and Bikramashila were still running strong till the 12th /13th century when the Muslims over ran India and destroyed them. Secondly there were still Mahasiddhas like Naropa, Tilopa and many others till the Muslim invasion. So, Buddhism was still running strong five century after Adi Sankaracharya. And furthermore, the stories of Sankaracharya as written by Ananda Giri and Madhava etc. do not contain any element which mentions that he debated with the Buddhists all over India and defeated them. In fact those stories show Sankaracharya debating mostly with other non-advaita Hindus and rarely with the Buddhist. So, the misconception that Sankaracharya went up and down India defeating all the Buddhists and this is how Buddhism vanished from India seems to be baseless and fabricated by uneducated Non-Buddhists. Thirdly, the Sankaracharya that came to Nepal seems to be of the 11th-12th century or later and not the Adi Sankaracharya. He seems to have entered Nepal when Buddhism was beginning to decline in Nepal as a result of its having declined in India due to the Islamic invasion which literally destroyed Buddhism in India. So he did not find any match for his debates and was able to convert many people in Kathmandu. He may possibly be the same Harinanda who was defeated by the Great Tibetan Guru Sakya Pandit. However this is not conclusive. But the stories do say he died in Tibet. However he did not die before he created havoc amongst the Buddhists of Kathmandu Valley, who still do not seem to have recovered from the shock. Big learning houses like Nalanda, Bikramashila etc were raised to the ground and the monks beheaded and the books in the libraries burnt to cinders by the Islamic invaders like Bakhtiar, Khilji etc. It is said in the diary of Khilji's general that, the books of the library of Nalanda took six months for the cinders to settle down and nine months for the smoke to settle down. So much destruction took place all over the Indian subcontinent. It said one of the reasons why the Buddhist monasteries were specially picked out by the Islamic invaders is that they mistook the monks in uniform monk dress as uniformed army men and the books in the library as books on warfare et al. This happened in the 12th/13th century, almost 5 centuries after Sankaracharya. Till then Buddhism was still flourishing strong in the Indian subcontinent." Excerpted from "Marshland Flowers," by Vidhyadhara Acarya Mahayogi Shridhar Rana Rinpoche.

[@sonukumar-do4sn]

Thanks sir ..very informative

[@sajiyakhan3933]

Nature of philosophy. Relationships life chintan sanskriti se hindi language

[@JDeka27]

Thank you so much 🙏🌼🌸

[@udaydhakadd]

Sandar sirji, verdant aur sankhya bhi Dale is bar apko mains ki पूरी teyari karbana hai.

[@nishamishra3494]

Sir please if possible regular videos dijiye and Aurobindo gosh bhi samjha dijiye please

[@DarshanikBharat]

Ok Nisha ji

[@fazalkhan7093]

👌👌

[@surtaram8662]

साधुवाद 🙏🙏🙏

[@DarshanikBharat]

धन्यवाद

[@navalvijay860]

Very nice efforts by you

[@vakprabhachannel1468]

Or aage ke bhi video daliye sir....yogachar Vaibhashik etc

[@nehay207adav]

Acha vedio h sir

[@Aryahumesh]

बहुत बहुत धन्यवाद प्रबल जी

[@DarshanikBharat]

🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@abinashbhoikvjharsuguda2026]

Nice video sir

[@Rajsingh09748]

Swat parmanyawad or parat parmanyawad pe bi ak video bnaye sir

[@samt1705]

Hello there, Namaste! 🙏🏼 This was helpful. Also, between Vedanta (especially Aadi Shankaracharya's non-dualism) and Madhyamaka (Nagarjuna), I find the Madyamaka to make logical sense to my thinking brain. (I will not even be able to easily point out exactly which part makes logical sense and how. I'm so far just a enthusiastic newbie). Except, so far I do not feel the need to take any Guru's words as Praman (proof). I'm just a beginner though, and I know people spend their entire lives truly 'knowing' them. One of my recurring curiosities is knowing comparison of philosophical and logical merits of these two philosophies. I also read that Aadi Shankaracharya is known to have established Advaita Vedanta's superiority over Buddhist philosophy, thus causing Buddhism to slowly diminish from India. All I understood so far is that the core issue was the concept of 'annatma' (non-self, which I am tempted to think is same as 'Shunyata') in Buddhism. Do you have any resources/references to understand this conflict better? Please also share your insights in this, if possible. Thanks! 🙏🏼

[@saswatabiswas190]

the teaching of buddha and Adi Sankaracharya is absolutely the same if you read nondualistic Vedanta is absolutely the same but approached in different ways. the issue is this what is told explicitly in Vedanta is not told by buddha because somewhere buddha was right it can't be told by intellect it's beyond intellect .and people misunderstood because they couldn't be able to self-realization. buddhas non-self-conception is absolutely right because that word comes from intellect ego and true you are beyond intellect.thats also taught in Vedanta. and people misunderstood it because lack of knowledge.what all sages buddha Sankaracharya came to the conclusion that only ultimate supreme awareness is there. its known Brahma in Vedanta. Buddhists taught something else which is literally false and that's why Buddhism got abolished from India because falsehood can not be co associated with real one. but notice it teaching of buddha is still in India. because he is enlightened one.that's why he is great

[@Paramasaugata]

@@saswatabiswas190 भाई साहब आपने शून्य को फाल्स (मिथ्या कहा ) और ब्राह्मण को ( सत्य) कहा..... शून्य को कैसे मिथ्या कह दिया जरा एक्सप्लेन करो इसका प्रमान दो... मे भी देखु कोनसी पंडिताई करके आये हो 😂..... और बौद्ध धर्म इंडिया से कँहा ख़तम हुआ......बौद्ध धर्म का केंद्र नालंदा महाविद्यालय तो 12 वी शताब्दी मे तोड़ दिया गया.... शंकर 12 वी शताब्दी मे कनहा से आ गया....????

[@Paramasaugata]

@@saswatabiswas190 फालतू की गपोड़ बाजी ना करो.... और शून्यवाद माद्यमिका प्रसंघिका का खंडन करके बताओ........ तुम्हारा गुरु शंकराचर्या खंडन नहीं कर सका... तुम्हारी भी पंडिताई देखता हु????????

[@saswatabiswas190]

@@Paramasaugata you are utter idiot.i am quantum physicist.Its pretty obvious for you I have much more knowledge than you.buddhism never leads to nihilism.neither you have idea about shankaracharya nor buddha nor modern physics.To make to understand is simply to make understand any artificial intelligence.you are ignorant all of this.your view is like materialist who say after death nothing is left.samw nihilism you are talking about .what upanishad says bramhan(pure consciousness),buddha said clear light or eternal harbour in mind .when read physics specially quantum same thing perceive ,physicality comes from mind like quark, boson .I am sharing some video for you .Get that idea of eternal consciousness and compare with what buddha actually said .He never said "you don't exist ",He said "you don't exist the way you think you exist " .You have basic understanding and started blabbering.I never say sunya is wrong I say there is someone (your real self who is observing sunyo).I am sharing link from Buddhist teacher

[@saswatabiswas190]

@@Paramasaugata kzbin.info/www/bejne/d5Owhnqsect-mMk go through carefully

[@Vivek_Shahane]

Session अच्छा रहा सर पर आगेगे points जैसे योगाचार मत, सौत्रांतीक मत और वैभाषिक मत इनको भी explain कर देते. Please Sir🙏

[@rahulmanishkumarsoni4570]

सर plzz इस सेक्शन को पूरा कीजिये🙏🙏

[@vijaychoudhary9715]

Awsome effort bhai

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thankyou Vijay❤️

[@SajidAli-qf9pe]

Sir ethics k bare m v video banayye n...

[@rahulkapoor5251]

Is avidya sat or asat?

[@rajnidhakad7458]

Sandar h sir

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thankyou

[@vedpuranupnishad]

द्रोहः सर्वभूतेषु कर्मणा मनसा गिरा । अनुग्रहश्च दानं च शीलं एतद दुर्बुधा।।

[@Boloniece]

Thank you so much again Penal. By the way mayavaada is called Pracchanabouddha! By the way if everything is shoonya, the gyan given by shoonyavaadi/ mayavaadi is also shoonya or Mithya or not?

[@mystery_monk]

Mithya is another thing than shunya. Mithya means "illusion of reality"....! But that illusion is also due to some reasons -- so it is also shunya in nature. Shunyata is behavior/nature of things - on the other hand mayavad never know/belive the "cause & effect" rule.

[@mahanadi-patelsirneetphysi7200]

सापेक्षवाद निर्भरता को बतलाता है , उन्ही निर्भरता को जिसे वर्णन किया जा सके , फिर शून्य जो अवर्णनीय है उसके निर्भरता के बारे में क्या सापेक्षिता देगा , यदि देगा तो फिर शून्य अवर्णनीय नहीं है , और नहीं देता है तो फिर सापेक्षवाद शून्य वाद कैसे हो जायेगा

[@saswatabiswas190]

you didint get that.sunyo means every object is in universe is dependent on absoluteone.thats why that existence of all objects in sunyo means basically do not exist

[@mukeshsrivastava309]

gud-1 keep it up

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thankyou

[@Hupplang77777]

Shun is also shun. No absolute phenomena even Shun.

[@DarshanikBharat]

For you it's a big zero♥️

[@shyamthagle]

Sir indian philosophy ko continue kijiye plzz kaafi din se apka wait kr rahe h apke lec ka lec kyu nahi aarahe b sir??

[@DarshanikBharat]

Ill continue in one or two days

[@shyamthagle]

Darshanik Bharat sir plzz continuity maintain kijiye coz optional ka yahi time hai fir time nahi nikal payega

[@DarshanikBharat]

Achha jii

[@shikhasehrawat4543]

Namaste sir,,,, mai ek yoga student hu,,,,, or aapki videos mere philosophy subject me bhot helpful rahi hai,,,, kya m aapse ek request kr skti hu ?? Kya aap please isi tarah ki "patanjali yoga sutra" ki b video bna skte hai please,,,, aapki explanation or notes bhot ache h

[@DarshanikBharat]

Main koe help nhi kr skta

[@shikhasehrawat4543]

@@DarshanikBharat ok,, dhanyawad

[@salmankrishna2942]

👍️👍️👍️

[@pchetansinh]

Awsm

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thankyou

[@rakeshanand222]

Ati sundar sir

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thanks

[@soniaraiswal]

Thank you 😃

[@DarshanikBharat]

Wlcm

[@mokshdarshan3917]

Very good video from the channel.

[@vijayprasad283]

NAMSKAAR SIR, SIR BUDHA DARSHAN KE APOHVAAD KA SIDDHANT PAR VIDEO BANAYEN.

[@DarshanikBharat]

Ayenge videos jldi he

[@Sarjerao88]

Thank you so much sir plzz provide us test series for upsc optional

[@DarshanikBharat]

Ok i'll provide

[@rakeshanand222]

Sir बौद्ध कर्मवाद पर वीडियो भेजे।

[@jai3595]

Darsan

[@PSF-Update]

धन्यवाद

[@nehay207adav]

Thanks

[@pushparathod6443]

superb 🙏

[@vishalgoveri4642]

Big thanks Sir

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thank you

[@bannabaisa1764]

sir, pls cover it all

[@bhanupratap7047]

Nice information

[@DarshanikBharat]

Thnkyou

[@Investwithsarvesh]

Koi apne bhot achhe se smjhaya

[@chhavikewalia7375]

Sir agla video kab aayega bodh darshan par

[@DarshanikBharat]

Upload kar dunga Chhavi ji..jaldi he

[@chhavikewalia7375]

Thanks sir

[@DarshanikBharat]

Welcome

[@sureshbehera7050]

Sir Atma gyan ke bare ne video banae

[@DarshanikBharat]

Ok

[@Umal1998]

👍

[@amrutarai6879]

Bilingual 🙏

[@ZONAMBIRUA]

Shrishti k prakriti me hone wala lagatar parivartan ko hi shunyawwad kaha ja sakta hai

[@Nisha-dc4zh]

Very nice video ..awsm lecturee ..sir pls pls apna gmail adress dijie plss how cn we contact you sir ....pls reply sir mera pcs mains june me 4 h n philosophy optiinl h plsss reply

[@DarshanikBharat]

[e-mail]

[@unadpotrarahim2006]

जब पारमार्थिक सत्य संवृति सत्य की सीडी बनाकर ही प्राप्त होता हैं तो संवृति सत्य ही भ्रम हैं तो पारमार्थिक सत्य भी भ्रम ही होना चाहिए ??

[@mausamgupta3583]

Thanks sir ji.

[@DarshanikBharat]

Welcome Mausam

[@mahanadi-patelsirneetphysi7200]

यदि शून्य अवर्णनीय है तो ये कैसे वर्णन आ गया की शून्य प्रत्येक वस्तु का आधार है |

[@umakantgairola7726]

यह महोदय यहां सिर्फ परीक्षा की दृष्टि से लेक्चर दे रहे हैं।

[@rationalthinking6152]

शून्य प्रत्येक वस्तु का आधार है : यह संकेत मात्र वाक्य है यह परिभाषा नहीं है.. कहने का अभिप्राय है कि शून्य का वर्णन नहीं किया जा सकता उसके बारे में सिर्फ इशारे किए जा सकते हैं समझने के लिए...

[@jitendrasharma9939]

निश्चित शून्य अवर्णनीय हैं और ये भी की ये प्रत्येक वस्तु का आधार भी है। इसे ऐसे समझे की यहां शून्यता से पर्याय व्यापकता से है अनंत विस्तार को ही शून्य कहा गया हैं। अन्नत विस्तार यानी शून्यता में चीजो को उत्पन्न करने की पूरी पोटेंशियलिटी मौजूद हैं यदि शून्य से वस्तुयें नहीं आएंगी तो फिर कहा से आ सकती हैं। धन्यवाद

[@harshitsrivastava8841]

@@umakantgairola7726 😂

[@yograjpatil5051]

Shunya Matlab sabkuch.

[@hardasbhide6678]

Thanks sir ji

[@DarshanikBharat]

Welcome

[@soniaforu11]

Sir Buddha Darshan ka or a man upman nahi mila

[@DarshanikBharat]

सोनिया जी बौद्ध दर्शन में दो ही प्रमाणों को स्वीकार किया गया है - अनुमान और प्रत्यक्ष। बौद्ध दर्शन की ज्ञान मीमांसा को दो बौद्ध सम्प्रदाय प्रस्तुत करते हैं- एक सौतांत्रिक और दूसरा वैभाषिक। सौतांत्रिक सम्प्रदाय अनुमान को ही एकमात्र प्रमाण मानता है जबकि वैभाषिक केवल प्रत्यक्ष को ही एकमात्र प्रमाण मानता है। दोनो सम्प्रदाय मिल कर कुल दो ही प्रमाण स्वीकार करते हैं- अनुमान और प्रत्यक्ष। अनुमान और प्रत्यक्ष को जानने के लिए आप चार्वाक की ज्ञान मीमांसा नामक वीडियो देखो और बौद्ध दर्शन में दार्शनिक विचारधारा का उदय नामक वीडियो देखो। धन्यवाद बौद्ध दर्शन में दार्शनिक विचारधारा का उदय----kzbin.info/www/bejne/sJC3dWZjgK2trdE चार्वाक की ज्ञान मीमांसा ----kzbin.info/www/bejne/mnS1f59qad6im80 ये दोनों वीडियोस आपको काफी कुछ सिखाएंगी।

[@vakprabhachannel1468]

Very useful

[@dinkarsingare810]

a suny to sare vishw me sabse vises he

[@saatvikspace4060]

Thank u sir

[@DarshanikBharat]

Wlcm

[@sajiyakhan3933]

Useful

[@ZONAMBIRUA]

Khargosh sat hai, sing v sat hai, ye dono hote hain, Isiliye alag alag swarup me sat hai, kharagosh k sar par sing asat hai, kyonki sing wala khargosh nahi hota isliye asat hai aur sing wala kharagosh, ko kharagosh nahi kaha ja sakta isliye asat hai

[@premanand8580]

Sir budh dershan ke or v samparday ka video dijiye

[@DarshanikBharat]

जल्दी ही अपलोड करता हूँ ok

[@ZONAMBIRUA]

Matlab ishwar ki kalpna ko shunywaad kaha ja sakta hai