My brain loves being wrapped with this kind of excitement!
@sapphire54752 жыл бұрын
Let's see how many subs I get from this comment... ..
@gloria882462 жыл бұрын
@@sapphire5475 0
@sethkaicer3192 жыл бұрын
Chris Kane in the membrane! Chris Kane in the brain!
@IKEMENOsakaman2 жыл бұрын
4:38 This is SO cool!!!
@deel1522 жыл бұрын
This aircraft is so ideal that it can be built very quick!
@whattheactualfook9762 жыл бұрын
Where I grew up there used to be an Optica in use / testing. It DEFINITELY wasn’t “ virtually silent”
@ecoideazventures64172 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your insight, but what they actually claim is "it is virtually silent in flight". very clever!
@whattheactualfook9762 жыл бұрын
@@ecoideazventures6417 It’s a cool little aircraft for sure. The sound has to go somewhere, so if it’s silent from inside it’s being sent elsewhere. It was a noisy little bugger from the ground. ( I still like it though )
@md.moinulislam94672 жыл бұрын
MASHAALLAH khub valo video.....
@udayansonawane7267 Жыл бұрын
Lot of em seem to be repeated from the last video of top 15 but it's good info
@clarencehopkins78322 жыл бұрын
Excellent stuff bro
@v-gc72572 жыл бұрын
Very unique and useful! Amazing !
@LordDustinDeWynd Жыл бұрын
9:42 AD-1 Scissorwing! I remember (reading articles in PopSci about) those! 😏🙃
@KiwiKoNZ2 жыл бұрын
What a crazy list … Awesome!! ✈️👈🤩👍✨
@moonwalker0910002 жыл бұрын
I have to commend all of the engineers and designers for these wonderful concepts. It always takes imagination to start a great idea and all of these are truly remarkable. Once again a great post. Thanks so much :o)
@sapphire54752 жыл бұрын
Let's see how many subs I get from this comment... ..
@LordDustinDeWynd Жыл бұрын
AAV-14 was mainly a ground-effect lifter for blasting across the steppe scaring the livestock.
@piconano2 жыл бұрын
I think the D8 starting at 1:37 is the most bang for the buck and looks to die for.
@sapphire54752 жыл бұрын
Let's see how many subs I get from this comment... ..
@richardg14262 жыл бұрын
How about a fast way to and from the Airport ! quick check in, and quick baggage claim ? I have spent more time at this things than on the plane.
@papajoe72 жыл бұрын
I think most of the concerts with these airplanes are the most incredible design and I strongly believe that they will be out sooner than we think because of the technology that's getting more advanced Day Care planes may be out sooner than we think one of my favorites is the wide wing where you can sit in the wing area and three levels is really good if one from the beginning and towards the end they're all great
@cliffcampbell88272 жыл бұрын
There are reasons as to why propeller driven planes have the prop at the front. The disruption of air by the wings and fuselage cause a pusher design to vibrate the whole plane.
@Snobiker132 жыл бұрын
No 2 is totally ridiculous of course, but still keeps popping up time and time again.
@阿久津誠-b2g2 жыл бұрын
サンダーバード2号に似てるのが何機か…
@LordDustinDeWynd Жыл бұрын
8:40 "Flying FLAPJACK". Do not take away the flavor of History!
@Xionmass2 жыл бұрын
Oh I see simple planes !! Cool . Do you play simple Rockets 2? It's better at making planes. I can build whatever plane you like to show in airplane videos
@doost62332 жыл бұрын
In aircraft design safety is number one, must be design for safe emergency landing this is number one making money for airliners is number two on the list.
@lindelheimen2 жыл бұрын
I didn’t know simple history was in on this channel
@joj40962 жыл бұрын
Love his voice
@LordDustinDeWynd Жыл бұрын
05:01 Edgely Optica: JUST finished content about the FanTrainer on Dark Skies! Serendipity?
@futureality78822 жыл бұрын
I am posting also today a video about future airplains! Its very excited
@christopheblanchi47772 жыл бұрын
Progress Eagle has been designed by someone who has never studied aerodynamics and it shows. That thing is a drag queen.
@burntsider84572 жыл бұрын
Between A and B. Among A, B, and C.
@geoffreyrussell6602 жыл бұрын
@ 10:18 - Ron Smith, engineer at NASA Ames Research Center - Mountain View CA. I worked w/ Ron as an intern for one year (1980?) and it was a treat - after this program.
@jayjay-bz3rr2 жыл бұрын
2) The progress eagle is basically a flying hotel
@ZERO-CHEATS-GAMING2 жыл бұрын
Imagine the lifesaving and also life changing technology available in the next 20 years 🤪🤙 Have a great weekend everyone ❤
@secularsunshine90362 жыл бұрын
*Let the Sunshine In.*
@demej00 Жыл бұрын
Icon A5 has had two fatal accidents and 4 non fatal ones but not due to design flaws - pilot errors.
@Zenas5212 жыл бұрын
The progress eagle looks like a flying elephant seal.
@Chris_at_Home2 жыл бұрын
I wonder how much extra weight is added to re-enforce an other than round fuselage? Airplanes are round for a reason.
@DanThompson10142 жыл бұрын
Solar panels for these electric panels? Only Sun above the clouds.
@최효석-x9m2 жыл бұрын
It's not a traditional bird, but like a ship's twin. It's nice to have wings in the middle of an airplane and have them at the ends of each wing. Transfer by naver papago.
@ShonMardani Жыл бұрын
I believe Parasite drag is produced by VERTICAL surfaces and Induced drag is created by HORIZANTAL surfaces ONLY, please let me know if you think I am correct. Thanks
@ecoideazventures64172 жыл бұрын
Why dont we see Boeing come up with such unique aircraft designs?!
@kenreynolds10002 жыл бұрын
They have done the research and the passenger experience in a flying wing doesn’t work. They are always looking for cheaper seat-mile innovations. When you don’t see them on the plane it is usually when they get shot down for cost, safety, or no market.
@KISAMBERNDELAP2 жыл бұрын
keren banget
@oguzkagan59052 жыл бұрын
Ellerinize emeklerinize yüreğinize sağlık Süper 💯💯💯💯
@treywest2682 жыл бұрын
The Progress Eagle is a far-fetched idea that I sincerely doubt will ever come to fruition. It would still have to tolerate adverse wind conditions while flying. I can't fathom 800 people in an aircraft with some ( or many) walking around to visit shops and restaurants. One good 5,000 foot drop will have many severe injuries and deaths.
@Titanis20002 жыл бұрын
Shops and restaurants in an airplane , not likely - they pack people in like sardines for a reason and that's to make money .
@Mopar-Pioneer2 жыл бұрын
A5C ??? Revisited 1956 Seabee ?????
@piconano2 жыл бұрын
Hero Zero, or Zero Hero? That is the question!
@sequri2 жыл бұрын
Variations on a theme. Notify me when they change the theme. Meanwhile, “here’s the latest internal combustion engine…”
@pcowdrey2 жыл бұрын
6:19..."All electric jet..." Right. I have a dream. In my dream, all "narrators" would know something about their subject, rather than just how to read script. But, maybe I'm just being silly. =PC=
@kevinferrin56952 жыл бұрын
All electric left jet? What mmm
@deniborraccini58012 жыл бұрын
I will be impressed whe n you can get from the East Coast to the West Coast in less than 5 hours.
@ikramelhadar87602 жыл бұрын
What is the so-called responsible for these designs?
@jameshaury27162 жыл бұрын
If an airplane has propellers it's not a JET!
@kinte1870 Жыл бұрын
Turbo jet propeller
@MrPir84free2 жыл бұрын
Knowing how slow it is to board an aircraft that has any number of seats to a few hundred, 800 on an single plane would make the boarding process that would take like a day to happen, let along un-boarding.. No thanks.
@asemkamal28542 жыл бұрын
Name of the soundtrack or link ?
@lukewarmwater64122 жыл бұрын
synergy? kalispell? ... what happened to his first design? he's been working on some kind of commuter aircraft since the late 90's out there at glacier international air port..
@christianlords13402 жыл бұрын
electric aircraft are a dead end. no pun intended.
@alainremi2672 жыл бұрын
Proteus at 7'20" ... Why the Proteus needs that complex layout ??? This goes against the American saying "Keep it simple, stupid!" i.e. the KISS principle fundamental of anything NASA undertakes ???
@noortrading47892 жыл бұрын
The best air bus should be powered by Lamborghini colour by Ferrari and design outside by Cadillac and inside by rolls Royce
@starguy27182 жыл бұрын
Airbus Maverick Progress Eagle Hmm.....
@shawns07622 жыл бұрын
That Airbus design is not good, efficiency would go way down because of the large increase in frontal area, this is why flying wings never caught on.
@robertmercier5409 Жыл бұрын
all mesurements and values are in feets and miles : non comprehensive by non US people. Please get international
@tomashellsten68442 жыл бұрын
Pleas do it in metric system
@rb4890120022 жыл бұрын
Geez talk about click bait. That "vertical lift jet" design shown at 0.05 is an old soviet era Wing in Ground effect aircraft photoshopped/video edited.
@gloria882462 жыл бұрын
🙄
@ОлегКо-э9к2 жыл бұрын
Ни одного стоящего проекта , НУБСТВО без опыта .
@kenreynolds10002 жыл бұрын
Flying wings.. Great for bombers. -G joyride for anyone out a little too far outboard. No thanks. Nixed by the big guys for that reason.
@29madmangaud292 жыл бұрын
this last one, what a laugh, stuff like that won't ever come true, because look at the shape of the world. Okay, in a PERFECT WORLD,, alright
@sapphire54752 жыл бұрын
Let's see how many subs I get from this comment... ..
@KO-pk7df2 жыл бұрын
These aircraft such as that Boeing, will never be successful as long as wall-street types are running the company. Maybe if the companies go back to be managed by technical leaders that understand this business.