Games : Alan Wake 2 - 0:06 Avatar Frontiers of Pandora - 1:05 CoD Warzone - 2:10 Cyberpunk 2077 Phantom Liberty - 3:16 Hogwarts Legacy - 4:25 Assassin's Creed Mirage - 5:30 Forza Horizon 5 - 6:50 Resident Evil 4 - 8:15 Starfield - 9:20 The Last of Us Part I - 10:28 System: Windows 11 Ryzen 7 7800X3D - bit.ly/43e3VxW MSI MPG X670E CARBON CPU Cooler - be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 - bit.ly/35G5atV 16Gb RAM DDR5 6000Mhz - bit.ly/3BOxlni 32Gb RAM DDR5 6000Mhz - bit.ly/3BOxlni GeForce RTX 3080 10GB - bit.ly/3hUikXp SSD - 2xSAMSUNG 970 EVO M.2 2280 1TB - bit.ly/2NmWeQe Power Supply CORSAIR RM850i 850W - bit.ly/3i2VoGI
@xXx-zc1yt8 ай бұрын
Go 4K
@M404508 ай бұрын
Testing Games Video uploads every year: january: 16Gb vs 32gb Feb: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Mär: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Apr: 16 GB vs 32GB Mai: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Jun: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Jul: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Aug: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Sep: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Okt: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Nov: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Dez: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB
@Rob-el8ti8 ай бұрын
hi testing games i hope your prepared to test all the new 40series vs the older 40 series and below im gonna bne watching out for ya vids :)
@kenobi6398 ай бұрын
Description says 6000 m/t Ram but the link lists 5200. ???
@TestingGames8 ай бұрын
in short, 16GB of RAM is still enough for most games, but I would still recommend taking 32GB for the future
@Shaf-ci4om8 ай бұрын
Does 1x 16GB DDR5 vs 2x 16GB Ddr5 make much difference? Wanted to know this because ddr5 works differently from ddr4 from what I have heard.
@mitulgamit4488 ай бұрын
Please make a video on 16GB ddr5 1x16 vs 16GB 8x8 ddr4 rame comparison ❤
@Definedd8 ай бұрын
Completely wrong, look at the 1% and 0.1% lows in every game tested. On the 16gb systems vs 32gb, the 32gb may use 1-8gb more ram, and the 16gb would be stuttery. Example: Hogwarts Legacy, Avatar, Warzone, Forza Horizon, AC MIrage. Basically every game other than cyberpunk.
@Definedd8 ай бұрын
You should incorporate average 1% and 0.1% lows into your graphs it'd be very beneficial for videos like this
@OriginalUser20238 ай бұрын
Why test with 3080?
@GFM12378 ай бұрын
So the difference in 1% lows . 32GB reduces the shuttering . Most games uses RAM close to 16GB . It means in future we need more then 16GB of RAM as a standard choice .
@Rwayne-8 ай бұрын
Shuttering ? did you mean stutter right ?
@velk_wanggoudan8 ай бұрын
I think you're a little bit blind, 16gb has better lows
@jasonroberts84168 ай бұрын
@@velk_wanggoudan might want to check the end of each game run where it shows a graph of results (such as at 2:04) 32GB has the better lows.
@purehollow8 ай бұрын
I don't really think so, the consoles only have 16gb ram/vram, I don't think games will require even more ram in this generation especially if you already have 16gb vram gpu
@penonton42608 ай бұрын
01:15 that game use 18gb ram ~ 🗿
@AlyesRock8 ай бұрын
16gb is still decent for the majority of current games but upcoming games will definitely require more ram and with the current prices 32gb is pretty much worth it
@garretts4318 ай бұрын
Dont think so yet.
@jochenkraus70167 ай бұрын
Based on the first few games 32GB help the 1% lows. I'd say if you have enough money then get 32GB instead of 16GB. If you're on a tight budget then you can save the money or put it where it's immediately useful e.g. faster GPU, bigger screen, or bigger SSD to have space for more games at once.
@InternetListener7 ай бұрын
@@jochenkraus7016 By the moment you really fully need 32 GB of ram we will need a PC upgrade of at least GPU or even CPU, if today it's nota problem with a rtx 4090, why care i n a slower card we probably have? Today adding the 16gb additional cost to your GPU makes your FPS go higher ,average, median, lows, middle, high and the nth fractionth of FPS you randomly choose... going from 8 to 16gb gpu makes a differenece for vram dependant games , now and more i the future for sure, or more if we add quality settings in the setup of our current games...more rome for RT and superresolution to work and increase resolution without losing FPS massively... but going from 16GB to 20 or 24GB or 48 GB for gaming now or tomorrow, is a waste of money... in the future it will be needed, for sure, but now rtx 4090 playing GTA 3 only needs 2 GB GTA 4, hard to use more than 4GB. GTA V, from 2 GB to 4GB is amazing iamge quality evfen on 4K, going upwards of 6GB of vram or more than 8GB almost impossible, 12 to 16gb may be used in PS5 version but 24 Gb even at 16K don't think it being possible without changing game source code and compile new version...
@TheRaiderd276 ай бұрын
The speed of the ram is more important go look at ddr5 vs ddr4 in games 😅
@vinayak904173 ай бұрын
But it's stupid cuz in current future it's mostly rtx graphics cards and new gen specs that makes ur whole old laptop completely outdated so I recommend to max 16gb for current use.. anyway u have to get a new laptop at some point in near future..so 32gb upgrade for a old specs laptop is stupidity 🤷🏻♂️
@itzrealzun8 ай бұрын
5 years later: 32 gb vs 64 gb RAM comparison
@flameskull88608 ай бұрын
32 is the sorta standard now, the high ones has 128
@johnnyboogalo48978 ай бұрын
I got 64gb and yes sometimes it makes a difference.32 should be main standard now and 16gb treated like 8gb now.
@TakumisBizarreRacingAdventure7 ай бұрын
I feel like GTA 6 with some heavy mods will definitely bring the 32GB vs 64GB comparison to life 💀💀
@mestrovac7 ай бұрын
@@TakumisBizarreRacingAdventure and GTRX ULTRA MAX 128gb vram
@Hhhh22222-w6 ай бұрын
It took about 10 years for 16gb to be somewhat the standard
@sa1dzhan8 ай бұрын
The fps differences might be small, but the 1% low fps sometimes is much better with 32 gb which will improve smoothness while gaming
@Markknightexeter8 ай бұрын
Probably due to 32gb ram sticks usually being dual rank
@m8x4258 ай бұрын
It's amazing to see that such few people look at the 1% and 0.1% lows. I wonder if RAM usage will get even worse with Windows 12.
@harmez78 ай бұрын
that absolutely doesn't matter, those 1% and .1% lows happen in a mere milliseconds. the average FPS is what you want to look at because it means the biggest portion of the time.
@qwertyuseradmin8 ай бұрын
@@harmez7 This is of absolute importance if you want a smooth game without microfreezes. Today 32 GB is the minimum for modern AAA games.
@Markknightexeter8 ай бұрын
@@m8x425 why would all reviewers show them if they weren't important? Ever heard of micro-stutter?
@MaTtRoSiTy8 ай бұрын
I bought another 16GB mainly because I keep a lot of browser tabs and other junk open so I easily consumed all the 16GB I had when running newer and more demanding games. But 16GB is still the sweet spot for sure
@Definedd8 ай бұрын
32gb is the sweet spot, 16gb is the minimum that shouldnt really be done since ram is so cheap
@harmez78 ай бұрын
cheap my ass. not everyone live in your heaven country@@Definedd
@MaTtRoSiTy8 ай бұрын
I disagree, this video clearly showed that you don't need more if you are just gaming and a sweet spot is not spending more on something you technically don't need. It is getting full use out of something for the best price possible. 32GB is a luxury, not a necessity at this point @@Definedd
@hadifelani8 ай бұрын
Nope, 32 is the new sweet spot since last year. Though technically capacity-wise it is closer to 24GB instead of 32GB, but who in the world nowadays bought two different sized RAM sticks aside from those laptop users who happened to have a soldered 8GB memory, leaving only a single SODIMM slot available to be upgraded?
@daniil38158 ай бұрын
@@hadifelani absolutely agree. 32gig is a must for new PC in 2024. it is not even a discussion. there is barely any 2х8 kits available, 90%+ kits are 2х16.
@gaffalover8 ай бұрын
Note this is tested on a X3D CPU, the impact might be more severe on non X3D Hardware with less L3$ due to more RW Operations to system memory.. It would be interesting to see the benefits of a non X3D and X3D CPU with both RAM configurations....
@فيصلشركار8 ай бұрын
👍👍
@OmnianMIU8 ай бұрын
Maybe 👍🏻👍🏻
@Sanjo-zg9dq8 ай бұрын
+ Raid ssd?
@M404508 ай бұрын
not correct. It only affects RAM's with different clock speeds. The GB is not relevant for x3d
@InternetListener8 ай бұрын
you know what reduces even more the cpu ram pcie accesses? having more vram on your gpu so there is no need to go there... but you're right that 7600x results 16gb/32gb may differe the same as using less powerful gpu like 7600 8gb /7600xt16gb, because is not the same you need to access ram or vram vs you already have it on the proper buffer or even being cached
@Droid34558 ай бұрын
16gb is fine for just gaming but considering that 32gb is cheap these days I'd go for it anyway
@harmez78 ай бұрын
you're talking about yourself, it's not cheap everywhere.
@hadifelani8 ай бұрын
@@harmez7 it is cheap.
@harmez78 ай бұрын
it costs as much as your ass@@hadifelani
@FutureDocta8 ай бұрын
Picked up 32 gb 3200mhz CL16 ram on black Friday for 29.99$
@scorpi37958 ай бұрын
@@hadifelani 110 euro for 32 gb.
@user-ve6dy7iv9i8 ай бұрын
Now 16 GB is enough in most cases. Where there is a need for more, it will work if nothing consumes RAM in the background, that is, purely Windows + the most important services + the game. Then this shouldn't be a big problem. Most users don't think about this, so in the most complex games they need more than 16 real GB. My Windows 10 consumption is 1.6 GB of RAM and +-40 processes. Total RAM in the system is 16GB. I run Hogwartz with 16 GB and get almost no stuttering. The Last of Us without problems.
@mastroitek6 ай бұрын
That is true, but regarding HL I think it simply has a weird behaviour. I run the game just fine with 16GB of ddr4 and a 12600k (and I'm on W11 which normally takes about 4Gb ram in idle); while a friend of mine with a 5700x and 32GB o RAM experiences stutters . 🤷♂
@fernandoschmit3 ай бұрын
@@mastroitek the stutters are caused by the lack of optimisation of the games for the AMD cards. I used almost every kind of AMD cards, and I can say that most of them are not fully stable and optimised for the most AAA title nowadays games.
@mastroitek3 ай бұрын
@@fernandoschmit He has an rtx3070, I played the game with rx5700xt, rx6950xt, arc750, rtx3060ti and now I'm using an rx7900gre (all of them with 16GB ddr4 and 12600k). I don't recall stuttering with any of the GPUs, the 750 was struggling the most and had some strong frametime spikes, but that was due to drivers and got mostly fixed time ago; thus in general I don't think it is a gpu problem. It just seems to me that HL is a "moody" game which for some reason does not always run as expected.
@nicane-99662 ай бұрын
@@mastroitek those stutters are due 8gb of VRAM not RAM.
@mastroitek2 ай бұрын
@@nicane-9966 that would not explain why I did not experience stutters on the 5700xt and a750 (after the driver fix)
@V3ntilator8 ай бұрын
I had 32.GB in my PC for years because RAM is so cheap, but i need 32.GB sometimes for video editing. RAM speed is more relevant. If i don't remember wrong you get up to 20% speed boost in games with DDR 5 vs DDR 4. When it comes to UE 5 Engine games, SSD Speed matters.
@iLLgetYourAse8 ай бұрын
DDR5 do not give any perfomance boost over DDR4, i think DDR5 can be easily skipped till DDR6.
@V3ntilator8 ай бұрын
@@iLLgetYourAseIt does. You can find proof of it on KZbin RAM benchmarks. "gaming ddr5 vs ddr4". I agree that it's pointless to get DDR 5 if you have DDR 4.
@noidsuper8 ай бұрын
@@V3ntilatorThis probably because of processor differences and not the ram itself. In any case, it wouldn’t make a difference in this video as he’s using an X3D CPU.
@V3ntilator8 ай бұрын
@@noidsuper Yeah, that's true. There is also games that relies more on RAM, and other games that relies more on VRAM. CPU usage between each game is so varied, because of how the games is made and if it's a open world or not. Different game engines matter too.
@lemirenceu_u76707 ай бұрын
My current 16 gb ram usage is 90%+, which i think make my fps not stable. Thats why i am planning to upgraded it to 32gb. Am i correct?
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
correct
@CBCuster4 ай бұрын
The test should be run with 5 Chrome tabs open, Discord open, and Spotify playing all in the background
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
fyi browsers using more ram as it runs longer, so true and agree
@alexsimon90328 ай бұрын
You've got the most useful comparison channel on the internet. 🙌 Thank you
@ryanjofre2 ай бұрын
Over 16gb of memory for gamers, speed and latency are WAY more than quantity!!! 32gb of ultra fast memory with ultra tight timings is gonna smoke a ton of memory with weak/loose timings and weak speed!!!!😱😱😱
@AndyPro058 ай бұрын
In Avatar you can see a difference in low 1% and low 0.1%. And if you have background tasks and 8Gb card, then you will have big problems... I have 4090 and I remember 20-24Gb of RAM used on some games, so 16Gb is enough only for budget gaming.
@misaelz298 ай бұрын
Keep in mind that RAM usage is higher when you have more than is need
@AndyPro058 ай бұрын
@@misaelz29 and also you have swap... )
@misaelz298 ай бұрын
@@AndyPro05 i dont understand what do you mean
@hadifelani8 ай бұрын
@@AndyPro05GB is a different unit to Gb....
@fullautoknightАй бұрын
This is completely false and stupid lmao
@NoamÐähaņ8 ай бұрын
Basically the same But should u buy 16gb while 32gb getting cheaper? No.
@Definedd8 ай бұрын
no they're not the same, look at the 1% and 0.1% lows. theyre much lower and sometimes cripplingly low for 16gb, that is what makes your game stutter.
@m8x4258 ай бұрын
That's the thing, 32GB of RAM is NO LONGER getting cheaper, at least for DDR4. All IC makers like Samsung, Hynix, and Micron have all pulled back on DDR4 IC production, and prices are expected to rise throughout 2024. Some projections state that DDR4 prices could climb by 10% to 15% per quarter, but this depends on demand. If PC building and computer sales makes a strong rebound this year, you'll see DDR4 prices go up a lot this year. Not sure about DDR5 because I keep hearing different stories about DDR5 production.
@Bilal.Hussain.Shaikh8 ай бұрын
This would be more helpful if this test were done on integrated graphics Apu's processors
@scorpi37958 ай бұрын
Guys just remember, if your specs are decent, ( not 3060 or higher perfomance) there is no need of 32 gb ram. If you are running 3050 laptop, or 1650, 16 gb is top. 😊
@Definedd8 ай бұрын
32gb is the new minimum for a gaming system, otherwise you're gonna have stutters with lower 1% and 0.1% lows in some games which is cripplingly bad in like 30% of these and bad in most others. Ram is so cheap its worth doing
@OmnianMIU8 ай бұрын
Not entirely minimum but 32GB is advised for a smoothness experience
@TakumisBizarreRacingAdventure8 ай бұрын
Imagine seeing this same comment 5 years ago. "32GB is minimum for not having stutters". Crazy 😭😭😭😭
@Definedd8 ай бұрын
@@TakumisBizarreRacingAdventure true, 5-6 years ago 8gb was the minimum and 16gb was recommended. 32gb should last wayyy longer than 5-6 years though before youd need more
@KirigayaHayato8 ай бұрын
to call it minimum is too much tbh.Recommended for future proof? yes.Minimum not really
@Nismo_Works2 ай бұрын
It isnt a minimum at all but its the better choice. I will have to pass on it though since 32gb ram for my ddr5 laptop costs as much as a 1tb m.2 ssd and i wont spend my money for such little difference
@kyle_ae8 ай бұрын
16gb is good for gaming until you open the browser
@Soley9118 ай бұрын
Nice video, which tool are you using to monitor the utilization ?
@Ethan7_78 ай бұрын
Most likely msi afterburner + rivatuner
@Rodrk18 ай бұрын
i got 32gb, after using 16gb during 2020 and half of 2023, 32gb reduces my stutters, got more fluid and i don't need to close programs in the background
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
closing apps before gaming is so 2011 lol
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
we got like 2-4gb mostly, but w games starting to run 64bit 4 was insufficient, like 16 now soon
@MrBoombast648 ай бұрын
Yea, this was expected if and IF you don´t have something else open that take memory, webrowser and such. Thanks for this showing mate. 😇😋
@Im_Wakzye8 ай бұрын
I have one 16gb ram bar. Will I gain a lot more fps with 32gb because I will use dual Chanel?
@vinayak904173 ай бұрын
No..but if u r doing lots of multitasks on ur laptop at same time then yes.
@patorikusutaru74838 ай бұрын
after trying so many game, I think 16gb is still ok for gaming since most asset stored in vram, but for a game that is memory sensitive or have bad memory management like hogwarts legacy , 32gb gonna help a lot
@-Rizecek-8 ай бұрын
32GB ram and 10GB vram should be the minimum that everyone should have.
@garbagepotato26 күн бұрын
if your playing these new games yeah, otherwise not needed
@adillpickle67627 күн бұрын
Not a fair comparison. Run the same games in 1080p and you will find that 1440p is 50% GPU but 1080p utilizes more system ram instead of GPU vram and that is what you are trying to demonstrate. I'm surprised I have to explain that.
@daniil38158 ай бұрын
I had 32gb for the last year, and it is worth it, 1% lows better, consistently see more than 16gb utilization, 32gigs helps a lot with multitasking, I don't have to close other programs to play any game. (keep in mind that RAM benchmark made on fresh Windows install with nothing running on the background) Also 32gig is a new standard. you will have troubles finding 2x8 ddr5 kit, 2х16 is typical for ddr5.
@karenvalidon7488 ай бұрын
Если в игре 3-4 часа от ОЗУ еще на +2 Гб увеличится.У людей ССД Нвме - и подкачка не на харде.ФПС точно не упадет очень низко - как это было в 200-х когда мы играли в 27 фпс и радовались не понимая ничего о всяких линиях кадра и 0,1% Но все это протянуто как то за уши - как сейчас 8 ГБ Врам не хватает якобы для ФХД. Где не хватает - все хватает и еще будет хватаеть 4 года. Игра все равно сделает как ей нужно - если будет лимит по памяти - даже ценой скидывания некоторых текстур на средние на какое то мгновение драйвером.То что у вас будет 60 фпс так это точно.А то недотестеры включат РТХ овердрайвы - и текстуры на ультра 4к и тыкают.ВОт узе 11 Гб занято.На 8 Гб картах у вас все равно будет 70-80 фпс - даже если будет превышать.На картах Нвидиа все впорядке (каша у новой серии отлично сохраняет 0,1% фпс на играбельном уровне) - у АМД с этим чуток по хуже.
@ryanjofre2 ай бұрын
I’ve got an awesome older AMD system with a TOTL Asus mobo and overclocked 😅GTX 1070. I’m upgrading from 16giga to 32gb TOTL GOAT Trident X DDR3 CL10 2400mhz!😱🤘☝️
@HelloTeamMyName8 ай бұрын
Hey man, what cooler are you using for your 7800x3d. I’m looking for some recommendations, thanks!
@zakimouzaoui43092 ай бұрын
be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
@jewii38246 ай бұрын
I see, so 32gb reduces stuttering on some games due to the improvements on 1% and 0.1% lows. Hogwarts Legacy was atrocious on the PC when it comes to stuttering with my 16gb.
@cmoneytheman5 ай бұрын
People who upgraded to all these high sized rams years ago already were future proofed 3 years ago and before 16gb was not needed now thats normal one day games will even need 64 which is shocking
@Detailing-Magic-268 ай бұрын
Я поставил rtx 4060 ti 16 gb и 64 гб оперативки ...все игры идут на ultra без тормозов 😉👍
@Tesseramous8 ай бұрын
I've had 96gb since 2018. How else are you supposed to run chrome?
@MyFaceHurtz2 ай бұрын
I’ve had 16gb of ram since 2012 so I hope 32gb is that future proof cause I’m just starting to see a reason to upgrade from 16gb finally after so long. 64GB could be on the board just cause ddr4 is so cheap rn and I’m currently on a r7 5800x3d.
@2010Zanoza28 ай бұрын
Not fair comparison. You should try 8gb card to correctly compare RAM amount. 3070 for example. And 16gb RAM will be completely destroyed by games. So. If you have 12gb card or more, it is possible to use 16gb of RAM with some lags (1% and 0,1% fps). If you have 8gb card - you should purchase 32-64 gb of RAM. If you want to buy a new PC even with 4090 card then you should buy 64gb of RAM with G.Skill 64 GB (2x32GB) DDR5 6800 MHz F5-6800J3445G32GX2-TZ5RK or Corsair 96 GB (2x48GB) DDR5 6600 MHz Vengeance RGB (CMH96GX5M2B6600C32) memory with even less timings.
@Sabbalab927 ай бұрын
Hogwarts Legacy was the reason I upgraded my computer last week. Most games still only need 16GB, but not for much longer. I went from 16GB to 32GB and a Ryzen 5 1600X to a Ryzen 5 5600X. In Hogwarts Legacy, the framerate went from 4FPS to a smooth 60. That is NOT an exageration.
@louiellywton50865 ай бұрын
May I know what GPU are you using right now?
@Sabbalab925 ай бұрын
@@louiellywton5086 I've been using a GTX 1660 Ti for the past 5 years. I haven't upgraded it yet, but I plan to soon.
@louiellywton50865 ай бұрын
@@Sabbalab92 that's nice, i have been researching for good gpu this past week because i want to build a new pc. Because my pc right now is kinda outdated with ryzen 5 3500 and rx 580.
@yanishammoumraoui61013 ай бұрын
Can i play hogwarts legacy with my 16GB?
@Sabbalab923 ай бұрын
@@yanishammoumraoui6101 I had to upgrade my Ram to play it, so I would upgrade if you can.
@deadshottii3 ай бұрын
Hey man, I’m really confused whether to get one of two different laptops. I will list the specs below and I’d really appreciate it if you can give me your opinion on which I should get: Zephyrus g14: 14” display. OLED 3K 120 Hz Ryzen 9 8945HS 32 GB RAM GeForce RTX 4070 1 TB SSD Zephyrus G16: 16” display. OLED 2.5K 240 Hz Intel Core Ultra 9 16 GB RAM GeForce RTX 4070 1 TB SSD Please keep in mind that the ram in these laptops is soldered in so I don’t have the option to upgrade it later on. What I really want is the G16. I really want the larger display (since it’ll be the only display I’ll have) and the dark grey color it comes in (unlike the g14 which only comes in a white color). It also has a higher refresh rate, and a better CPU. Everything about it is better…except for the ram. I’m worried that I’ll face problems with the RAM in the long run since I’m planning on keeping this laptop for atleast 5 years. I’m getting this for some gaming (mainly games such as COD, GTA, and some others) in addition to school work (which won’t be demanding). I like everything about the G16 more except for obviously the ram. Do you think this difference in ram is worth me choosing the g14 instead?
@SeeYouInHeeLL7 ай бұрын
1% low , now 32 gb ram must be
@Utente3128 ай бұрын
I have an RTX 4070 even if I do 100 fps the view is completely jerky, the RTX 4070 costs a lot it's not right that I should have these problems, now I'm fed up, I've always been against PC and this gives me confirmation.
@sinenomine45408 ай бұрын
40 series was a huge letdown.
@narin3122Ай бұрын
It's overclocking 4400mhz and very hot
@NorGame_FTV8 ай бұрын
Hi, I'm one of your subscribers who has been following you for 2 years. I wanted to know some information or even if you made a video on 2 processors, an amd 7 5800xSW amd 9 5900x. but you didn't even answer me or give me an explanation, which one is better, thanks for not even having me written you are always great for me but I'm starting to DOUBT
@jefferycoleman37816 ай бұрын
I just went from a cheap pny 16gb set(2x8) ddr4 2100mhz clocked to 3200mhz with tight timings, to a high end 3600mhz 32gb set(2x16). My pny performance was better, VERY GOOD actually, I will tweak the new stuff tho, it will be fine.
@ctrl_x17706 ай бұрын
What games are you playing that show such a drastic difference? Cuz it may potentially be the speed the ram influencing your build the most, and not the ram size.
@legeminus8 ай бұрын
OS uses more RAM to itself if you have more RAM installed. I.e. if you have 8 gbs of RAM win10/11 will use 2.3-2.5 GB of RAM, for 16 GB it will use 3.5-4 GB of RAM and for 32 gb it will use 5-6 GB of RAM + background processes can consume more RAM (Nvidia, adobe, telegram etc). Only weird thing happened to Hogwarts Legacy, maybe it's not optimized well or something big and heavy was ran in background while testing Hogwarts Legacy. So it's enough to have 16 GB of RAM nowadays. Maybe 24 GB of ram in near future (i.e. 16+8) as reserve.
@masterofdiesaster40018 ай бұрын
now with discord and more in the background
@ESKATEUK8 ай бұрын
The thing people aren’t taking into account is the 1% and 0.1% lows and how much better they are, equalling a smoother experience. For as cheap as 16gb of ram is for most people, it’s a worthwhile upgrade.
@sinenomine45408 ай бұрын
2 games showed any difference.
@ESKATEUK8 ай бұрын
@@sinenomine4540 3 games showed a massive difference, and 1 game showed a massive difference in the 0.1%. So 50% of the games showed a difference. Your point is?
@sinenomine45408 ай бұрын
lol you can't be serious dude.@@ESKATEUK
@leandromorais15848 ай бұрын
Em TLOU, se abrir o discord o pc explode 😂... 32gb ainda é o melhor caminho.
@HungLe-ig7nj21 күн бұрын
Actually, 16 or 32 GB RAM does not say anything about performance. If the game or app designed for a certain amount of RAM. Then it just like that. Not going to take more RAM if you had 32 over 16. More RAM to help you multi-task better. Not for the performance in term of loading single game/app at a time
@ВаталЯ-щ5б8 ай бұрын
The point is to have more memory not in fps in games, but so that you can play the game and open a lot of tabs in 3 browsers.
@m8x4258 ай бұрын
or not have stutters and framerate drops, which is happening in these supposedly "poorly optimized" games.
@boriskovalsky54896 ай бұрын
you can buy 32gb ram if when you play, you have discord, chrome, other programs open or other games (i don't know). 32gb ram will make it more easy. But for gaming is not worth it
@skinscalp2228 ай бұрын
I saw a Reddit thread full of comments saying 16GB is not enough for gaming anymore. I know Redditors aren't the brightest bunch but still...
@FreemanBgTV8 ай бұрын
Cool video Nice work
@leonardomaccarinelli118 ай бұрын
Is the different mouse pointer in different games automatic or did you put it?
@KHALID478 ай бұрын
Point is if you upgrade 3 years from now,go 32 gb for now no need to add ram
@forog18 ай бұрын
I mean 16gb ram is enough to play "the game" but if you're like me which might be a number of gamers, I like to watch KZbin and browse the web, research the game I'm playing for details like where to find best in slot items and etc etc while playing the games. All of which 16gb will tank the whole system responsiveness let alone FPS. 32gb ram is minimum for optimal PC performance.
@androyd8 ай бұрын
16 - minimum in 2024
@Deathdemon658 ай бұрын
3 year ago 8 gb was enough and 16 gb was recommended now 16 gb enough and 32 gb recommended wtf is wrong devs really doing poor optimisation
@AntonioDal.5 ай бұрын
Summary: - Average FPS remains about the same - Low 1% and 0,1% FPS will improve with 32GB RAM, meaning less micro stutter/lag
@mf66886 ай бұрын
Is the amount of RAM better than the frequency? NICE VIDEO
@mikeescalante83628 ай бұрын
I went from 16gb to 64gb from cl18 to cl16 and I won 3 fps, no because of the size but because of the timings
@M404508 ай бұрын
Testin Games Video uploads every year: january: 16Gb vs 32gb Feb: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Mär: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Apr: 16 GB vs 32GB Mai: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Jun: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Jul: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Aug: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Sep: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Okt: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Nov: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB Dez: 8GB vs 16 GB vs 32GB
@DerHalbeEuro8 ай бұрын
This test is maybe not 100% correct. Maybe your BIOS settings are wrong. Who knows.. I have a system (RX 5700XT OC, Ryzen 5 3600 @ 4.0Ghz with 16GB DDR4 3200mhz and 2 free slots on my mainboard. Someday i was bored and had money left and decide to just buy 32GB DDR4 RAM with the same speed for 30€. Mostly i play CoD Warzone and Multiplayer and my fps jumped up to ~5 - 10 fps. It's not much but still noticable. Everything feels "smoother". My Windows boots up and shut down quicker than before.
@boyplaysgame3 ай бұрын
What screen recording app do u use
@Burmn8 ай бұрын
Run them again but with 30 browser tabs open... lol
@TheoretischBoi3 ай бұрын
What cooler do you use for the cpu?
@annoyedchef71243 ай бұрын
For Escape from Tarkov at this state 16gb is not enough. Nor 32gb. It has memory leak issues and is horribly optimized.
@umarsaidahmad54708 ай бұрын
If just for gaming, 16GB is enough, but Chrome, Faceit, screen recording, discord, require more.
@m8x4258 ай бұрын
Those 1% lows were getting hammered with 16GB of RAM.
@orkun38488 ай бұрын
Hogwarts using 23GB of ram is wild af... I mean the game's not even that good in terms of graphics.. it's really hard to comprehend why this game's demanding so much. what a sh1tty optimization
@sterling44498 ай бұрын
The difference in price between 16gb and 32 gb is too miniscule rn, it looks like 32 gb slowly becoming new standard
@hadifelani8 ай бұрын
They already are since last year
@sterling44498 ай бұрын
true@@hadifelani
@Ümitcan_Uygun065 ай бұрын
bro you must try these test in games that require more than 16GB of RAM (eg. ark ascended). Can you tell me the meaning of doing this test in games that do not use more than 16GB of RAM?
@mykothy8 ай бұрын
It would be nice to know the test system specs up front. Rather than in the comments. Tip for the future perhaps..? 🙂
@masterofdiesaster40018 ай бұрын
Also in the Video Description, you can read it even before you watch the video
@wolker2138 ай бұрын
But 7 days to die can use up to 25gb of ram
@atsumuwu46108 ай бұрын
Is DDR5 performance not comparable to DDR4 with 16 GB? On DDR4 you have crashes and stutters in new games.
@6Thompson97 ай бұрын
I always watch something while gaming and 16GB RAM is not enough most of the time. If you only focus on your game then 16GB should be more than enough.
@ksouvenir55618 ай бұрын
OMG the 1% low has a double FPS performance, how is possible?
@dasllamas6 ай бұрын
Great work putting this together but it looks like your 3080 was maxed out on most of your tests. Wont see an increase of fps on anything, no matter how much ram you have. You are bottlenecked
@АлександрКитов-в1р8 ай бұрын
The test is incorrect. The video memory capacity of the 3080 10 GB is no longer enough in some games in 2024 for 2K resolution. Therefore, RAM consumption increases. In this case, it is necessary to use a video card with a large amount of video memory. Or reduce the resolution to Full HD.
@MrDidifar8 ай бұрын
Shouldve test cities skylines2.. was confused while playing it on my 16gb laptop and suddenly it stutters like crazy, turns out it uses 13gb+ ram and my laptop is busy dumping the ram to my drive. 😂😂
@CamX362 ай бұрын
ok now do these tests with chrome, Discord and OBS running in the background
@gonzalodeviantart8 ай бұрын
Where is red dead redemption 2?
@V3ntilator8 ай бұрын
RDR 2 were designed for consoles, so my guess it won't make any difference on PC.
@InternetListener8 ай бұрын
16GB ddr4 3600 cl18 (or 16gb ddr5 5200) and 16gb vram gpu is the way to get th most bang for your buck, unless PC go to shared memory like game consoles, why to pay 2 or 3 times more on ram for almost not uplift in perfromance? you could make a difference buying better gpu with that money...
@mespacelizard8 ай бұрын
Avatar would have been the one to look at. Even with that, nothing.
@nhkk28938 ай бұрын
16 gb will probably be fine uttil 2027/28 considering the consoles only have 16 shared meaning most games are being developed with 10 or so in mind
@Definedd8 ай бұрын
16gb already is the absolute minimum, it's not enough at all. Look at the 1% and 0.1% lows of the games on 16gb, that will be stutter you might experience
@robertopazsoldan96418 ай бұрын
The real diference is when you gaming and have a browser with 10+ tabs like me 32gb is way more confortable, with 16gb i cant do that with the same smoothness.
@m8x4258 ай бұрын
The 1% lows were getting hammered with 16GB of RAM
@glorykun4 ай бұрын
with no fast paced action.i dont know if this result matter
@iitzkris7 ай бұрын
now what if you stream and play these games tpgether? will 16 GB be enough?
@darimedits60728 ай бұрын
Look how stable the frametime are in 32GB.
@adrianstan57948 ай бұрын
Hogwarts Legacy going above 20gb of ram usage is simply not ok... such a poorly optimised game.
@hogrida52987 ай бұрын
i just upgraded from 32 to 64 i noticed no difference at all i noticed a slight difference from 16 to 32 like in rust and fortnite
@ramazankaratopcu8 ай бұрын
You must test it with espor games like CS2, PUBG, Valorant, The Finals, Warzone 2.0... İt takes a huge %1 and %0.1 fps difference in that games. We can see Warzone 2.0 %1 fps 32gb: 108 and 16gb 68 fps. Please make other espor games too.
@franco74827 ай бұрын
16 gigas is now the old 8 gigas, 32 gigas is now the new 16 gigas, 64 gigas is in the the way..
@kouomarthurgerman39896 ай бұрын
Please which app do you use for onscreen FPS display
@sasha17035 ай бұрын
Msi afterburner
@Ryzen4070TM2 ай бұрын
16 MINIMUM Refrain from 8gb, it's no longer 2017 Soon 32 will be the new 8gb so I'd future proof it and get 32
@ZiZo343448 ай бұрын
2 more years and 24GB + will become a necessity
@supervisor20108 ай бұрын
When to test ryzen 8700g vs 8600g ? 8cu vs 12cu.
@MrGeesikser8 ай бұрын
Ofc in games will be basically the same, but try to leave firefox opened with 30 tabs in background...
@iikatinggangsengii2471Ай бұрын
true many jobs/usages nowadays cant bare to have browsers closed, mine too
@vendettamalize72097 ай бұрын
what fps cpu gpu counter/metrics are you using????
@sasha17035 ай бұрын
Msi afterburner
@amerikanec-8 ай бұрын
Графика не меняется много лет (не считая этих супер лучей)зато требования растут. Как у них это получается?
@jager566 ай бұрын
Скорее игры становятся все хуже и хуже, а системки растут, все благодаря критикам и индюшной санине по типу палвордов, летал компани, хелдрайв и т.д, разрабы понимают, нахер стараться, если можно лутать бабки на онлайн скотобойня для младенцев, а не заниматься норм играми и их оптимизацией, какие шикарные игры выходили в 2000,эх....
@EugeneMaseko-ei4kyАй бұрын
Good content🎉
@bestcarsimulators56737 ай бұрын
Кадров вроде столько же, однако справа картинка плавнее