I rather like you both as historians, but this effort was toe-curlingly priggish, self-righteous and arrogant in the manner of the most caricatured middle-class liberal. Self-awareness doesn't seem to be mutually inclusive with historical nowse and online affability...
@jonathangammond30195 ай бұрын
There wasn't enough history in the discussion, especially pre-20th century history.
@mediastudiesnetwork4 ай бұрын
Love this discussion … you guys brilliantly unpacked a complex identity and his historical shifts. This could be more episodes!
@kambrose15493 ай бұрын
You don't touch on class antagonism. When I left England in the early 70s I felt that the absurd class distinctions would surely just fade away. Alas not so. If anything the antipathy has become worse.
@TracyPicabia2 ай бұрын
Identity replaced class fairly recently. Unfortunately (for lefties like me.)
@ilatfen282 ай бұрын
~ "el Imperio británico todavía tiene su eco en la historia,,," ❤
@Johnconno5 ай бұрын
Ah, England. Those blue remembered hills where I cannot go again.😢
@thanksfernuthin6 ай бұрын
Virtue signals received loud and clear.
@mrshivers48286 ай бұрын
Chill out mate
@thanksfernuthin6 ай бұрын
@@mrshivers4828 I'm chill mate. Are you?
@lukedaniels77502 ай бұрын
If you think that was virtue signalling then i suggest that you might need to buy a dictionary.
@liammcnichol33692 ай бұрын
And I’m sorry but David Cameron and the Tories did more to fan the flames for Scottish nationalism and isolate them more than Tony Blair ever did
@dearestsimone2 жыл бұрын
Well-- one comment. Here in America, intellectuals like yourselves do not get so wonderfully giddy about sports. What a wonder! Why is this?
@Shapeguydude2 жыл бұрын
You mustn't have seen me watch the Bill's game last night
@chickenfishhybrid44 Жыл бұрын
You think there aren't intellectuals who are into sports in the US?
@Johnconno5 ай бұрын
Chomsky is a lifelong Baseball fan.
@andrewmcmurray808111 күн бұрын
They were talking about intellectuals. @@Johnconno
@Johnconno11 күн бұрын
@@andrewmcmurray8081 Hilarious. 🌹
@louisetrott55323 күн бұрын
I think patriotism is seen as embarrassing to the English, because it involves high emotion. And that is embarrassing. And it is not done to get too excited about anything, for good or for bad. Indeed, I always found the sight of the late Queen showing high emotion and excitement about horse-racing rather odd and undignified!!
@lukedaniels77502 ай бұрын
The guest speaker certanly got it wrong about Labour not getting elected again, or the SNP holding up thier majority.
@yankeegonesouth4973 Жыл бұрын
0:34 "...the vastness of England..." I suppose Orwell could be speaking of the many particularities of England which he goes on to mention, but as an inhabitant of North America, that phrase had me cracking up. 😅
@Irene-im8xi Жыл бұрын
The kingdom of Scotland was founded in the 9th Century whereas England became a kingdom, after Scotland, in the 10th Century.
@Bobmudu35UK6 ай бұрын
I don't think that's right,not that it matters. England was 927 and Scotland was 1018 I think. Before that Malcolm McAlpine (not sure I spelled that correctly) was king of the Picts,not king of Scotland. Lothian was still ruled by the Angles if my memory serves. .I think it was Duncan ll that threw the English out of Lothian. Could be wrong,but I don't think I am.
@kayedavison52186 ай бұрын
And?? Your point??
@theshrubberer4 ай бұрын
thank god there was a reference to Stanley Baldwin. I never heard of him until The Rest is History and now I am sad whenever he is not mentioned in an episode 😂
@davidwilkinson6009Ай бұрын
When the English talk about Englishness they are talking about themselves....
@harrydebastardeharris9874 ай бұрын
What absolute rubbish.
@michaelkennedy33722 ай бұрын
Whenever I go back to England the first thing I think is that everybody has their head in the sands about a gigantic problem.
@harrydebastardeharris9874 ай бұрын
Whenever I get back to England I realise how complicated easy things are to get done,even more today.
@Taqruinnius7 ай бұрын
Your parliamentary system can't be any worse than the electoral college.
@JohnAsmith-rw6uo7 ай бұрын
Why is that?
@Taqruinnius7 ай бұрын
@@JohnAsmith-rw6uo A few reasons, one you could have electors who don't vote for the person who won the state. Two you could have a president lose the popular vote but still win the election. Three the whole election is based on what a few states decided to vote for. These swing states are the most important and candidates spend most if not all their time in these states while ignoring the rest. Granted the rest of the states will vote for the same party again and again. Four states with a bigger population get more electors compared to states with smaller populations. Your electors are based on the number of representatives within the House and Senators. North Dakota for example gets three while California gets 54. There is also the possibility of a tie as it has happened before, however rare it is. Finally, it is extremely difficult for third parties to win. It is dominated by the Republicans and Democrats and has been that way since 1850.
@JohnAsmith-rw6uo7 ай бұрын
@@Taqruinnius So you think a state like California swimming with illegal migrates should have more say than the people from Vermont. Also you do not want so many parties that split the vote down so a tyrants the Hitler can take power.
@JohnAsmith-rw6uo7 ай бұрын
@@Taqruinnius l Would say except for the losers we have since 1988 it has worked out pretty good. I think l better way is to nominate better men for the job.
@Taqruinnius7 ай бұрын
@@JohnAsmith-rw6uo I'm saying that the electoral college gives a state like Texas, California, New York, Florida more weight in terms of presidential elections than a state like North Dakota.
@Terinije2 жыл бұрын
I don't really agree with the idea that devolution ignited nationalism, it merely gave an avenue for it to be aired rather than be ignored by the English. If the Scottish Parliament had never existed, I'd guarantee that there'd still be an existential angst of Scottish nationals wanting out due to anger over Tory policies and brexit. The Scottish Parliament just created a central focal point and leader apparent in the movement that'd otherwise be spread out among a smaller Westminster party and Scottish-based groups.
@OnlineEnglish-wl5rp5 ай бұрын
The Tories never did anything to Scotland that they didn't do to England or Wales. If the British Establishment hadn't imposed neoliberal globalisation and its attendant mass immigration, we'd still be in your precious EU - which itself has wrecked Europe
@liammcnichol33692 ай бұрын
Felt very Tory this
@jamesdunne98335 ай бұрын
The most English podcast ever. Literally and figuratively tone deaf to the world.
@theshrubberer4 ай бұрын
that's the charm. The insouciance is refreshing. As an American I love their irreverence
@beachcomber1able3 ай бұрын
These two are what we call here in Scotland " Little Englander Gammons". 😏
@lukedaniels77502 ай бұрын
@@beachcomber1able You are of course free to make your own podcast about Scottishness and what it means to you.