1812. Napoleonic Wars in Russia - Episode 2. Documentary Film. StarMedia. English Subtitles

Watch free documentary on russian with english subtitles
All episodes: • 1812. Napoleonic Wars ...
On 26th August, 1812, two huge armies were doing the last preparations to one of the bloodiest battle of the epoch near the village of Borodino, 124 kilometers away from Moscow. A quarter of million soldiers, over a thousand cannons. Here, near Borodino, the fate of all the military campaign, the fate of Moscow, the fate of all Russia was being decided.
With the first streak of dawn the drums roared and pipes sounded in the French and Russian camps. At about 5.30 a.m. over 100 French cannons started bombarding the positions of the Russian left flank where the Bagration flèches were located, while the first distracting attacks were held by Napoleon on the right flank.
Type: historical reenactment
Genre: docudrama
Year of production: 2012
Number of episodes: 4
Directed by: Pavel Tupik
Written by: Valeriy Babich
Director of photography: Dmitriy Kiptilyu
Music by: Boris Kukoba
Producers: Valeriy Babich, Vlad Ryashin, Oleg Vol'nov, Konstantin Ernst
Watch movies and TV series for free in high quality.
Explore a great collection of documentaries.
The best Russian movies and tv series, melodrama, war movies, military tv shows, new russian films, top documentary films and full movies with english subtitle.
With these free online Russian language movies you will learn Russian easily.
Subscribe for high quality movies and series on our channel.
Enjoy Watching!
#StarMediaEN

[@davejay2277]

Thank you so much for uploading these, as i love, and have always had a keen interest in Russian and Soviet history, these Star Media programs have no Hollywood nonsense.

[@manuelnobre6681]

These War of 1812 videos are brilliant. The maps, the biographic details, the uniforms, the guns...I could go on.

[@rdallas81]

Star media is absolutely terrific.

[@nikolaspotapoff4205]

I am very proud.My ansestor grand grand...grand father Ivan Potapov were soldier Smolensk infantry regiment.Slava Rysskomy oryziy I soldaty-molodzy.

[@Jurgen_Ibro]

Et maintenant tu es français, oui?

[@georgehare2915]

then along comes jews living i n london

[@SEOdork4hire]

He was a good man

[@duracel7155]

And mine, without joke, was Dmitry Neverovsky 💪🏻. Thank you for your ancestor 💪🏻🇷🇺

[@alfredkirkham846]

Thanks for this work. It is very thorough and comprehensive. Generally, It is hard to find this high level of historical information

[@hildavalerolozano7752]

Increíble la división de Neverovsky ! Que valentía ! Estoy agradecida de conocer esta parte de la historia rusa, es fascinante y como enfrentaron al invasor francés ! En méxico también quisieron poner su bota aunque fué el sobrino pero tampoco pudieron ! Gracias por estos magníficos videos !

[@duracel7155]

Thank You very much 💪🏻🇷🇺

[@alexmurray6515]

Thank you for this episode 2. Yesterday I saw the 1, and tomorrow I will see the 3.

[@angelikavrb]

A wonderful idea. Chic, gorgeous, elegant!!!!

[@Elise10000]

This is very interesting and I will watch further episodes. I will say it is difficult when, each time a military leader is introduced for a battle, that person's full bio is given including background, big LATER campaigns, political intrigues, and their death. It is hard enough to focus on details of battle without this info. Their later events/death could be given at end of each episode. I'm also reading War & Peace & it is great to get a better sense of uniforms, artillery, fighting tactics, understand what a hussar is : ), and see key names (like Bagration) that come up there.

[@teltos6817]

Fortunately, this is not a Hollywood action movie and this is the history of Russia. The names of the real heroes the saviors of the motherland should be in this story this gives them honor and respect after 2 centuries. The least we can do.

[@Elise10000]

@@teltos6817 I am not saying not to include them or their names or their info. You’re not understanding or reading my comment. I’m valuing this documentary, I’m saying that it is great. I’m saying there is probably another way to include their later accomplishments or later life story, perhaps at the end of a segment. It can be hard when all such info is presented at once, amid the other events and timeline. I appreciate the context of their later contribution but consider not putting all the information in at once.

[@kyabe5813]

@@Elise10000 I think that the way they have done it is perfect. Most people would skip over the end segment if it just contains an 'appendix' like summary of the generals without proper context.

[@nikolaspotapoff4205]

50:22 Fieldmarshal Mihailo Illarionovich Golenichev-Kutyzov lost his right eye near my city Alushta.Back to that time he was yang officer and he and his regiment fight Turkish troops that landed in Crimea.Still 9km from Alisha stand monument for that event.Slava Nepobedimomy Rysskomy oryziy i nashim geroicheskim predkam.

[@WhiteSeaLeviathan]

Ti posmotri mosh eshe naydesh, gdenibud pod kustom lejit.

[@НатальяТерехова-е7щ]

@@WhiteSeaLeviathan Да откуда он под кустом? Этот куст же твои предки оккупировали: так поколениями оттуда лезут и лезут... Подкустовые выползни).

[@honesty3440]

Nobody ever was able to break Russia.

[@antoniocarrascosa6060]

Magnífico

[@kohtalainenalias]

It would be awesome to have english narration and animation texts like in Soviet Storm

[@matmallan6099]

wow! good.

[@ecapricorn666]

The name of the rive is the Moskva, not Moscow

[@Gyatt_frfr]

21:19 "Дорогой мой, я не иду-я бегу! Желал бы иметь крылья, чтобы скорей соединиться с тобою" Было бы ОЧЕНЬ смешно без знаний исторического контекста, а так приходится лишь вздыхать

[@AvgerinouAna99]

Παρ' όλο που έκαναν και οι δύο το ίδιο απονενοημένο διάβημα, αρνούμαι να συγκρίνω τον Ναπολέοντα με τον Χίτλερ. ΔΕΝ ήταν ίδιοι

[@johngeo5737]

ισα ισα αυτο δειχνει πως 2 εντελως διαφορετικοι ανθρωποι καβαλησαν το καλαμι κι επαθαν την ιδια ακριβως καταστροφη, ενω και οι 2 ειχαν οργανωσει τα κρατη τους πολυ καλα και ειχαν καταλαβει ολη την ευρωποη πριν επιτεθουν στη ρωσια

[@AvgerinouAna99]

Μην συγκρίνεις την Ναπολεόντεια Γαλλία με την Ναζιστική Γερμανία. Η πρώτη ήταν η άνοιξη της σύγχρονης Ευρώπης, η δεύτερη ο βαρύς χεινώνας της

[@johngeo5737]

***** κανεις δεν τις συγκρινε με αυτο τον τροπο, αλλα σκοπο εχει η συγκριση, δεν ειπα οτι αφου και οι 2 καβαλησαν το καλαμι και αφου και οι 2 επιτεθηκαν στη ρωσια σημαινει οτι ναπολεοντια γαλλια=ναζιστικη γερμανια, απλα ειπαμε οτι αφου εγιναν αυτα που εγιναν βγαζουμε συμπερασμα οτι ειναι αψυχολογητη κινηση να επιτεθεις στη ρωσια, γι αυτο το λογο γινεται η συγκριση, κανεις μα κανεις δεν ειπε οτι εμοιαζαν στην πολιτικη τους, ειδικα απο τη στιγμη που η γαλλια περα απο τη ρωσια, την ισπανια και την αιγυπτο δεν εκανε επεκτατικο πολεμο, οι αλλοι επιτιθονταν και τους επαιρνε απο πισω ο ναπολεωντας ενω οι γερμανοι εκαναν καθαρα κατακτητικους πολεμους

[@georgevlavianos1401]

Είσαι πλανεμένη. Και οι δύο άθεοι αιματοκύλησαν την Ευρωπη . Η πρώτη που λές ήταν η αρχή της βαρυχειμωνιάς των άθεων απάνθρωπων μισάνθρωπων της σύγχρονης ευρώπης και του κόσμου, και μόνο ανόητοι δεν μπορούν να εξισώσουν την ομοιότητα, κενοδοξία, φιλοδοξία και απανθρωπιά αυτών των δύο. Η μόνη προφανής σύγκριση που μπορεί να γίνει είναι μεταξύ ναπολέοντα και χίτλερ. Με ποιόν θα ήθελες να συγκρίνεις τον "στρατηλάτη" σου; Και βεβαίως έχει δίκιο ο john geo που λέει ότι καβάλησαν το καλάμι.

[@Marc_Masters]

Murat's body was never found?

[@pma281]

Nope, it hasn't been found yet. Maybe it's located somewhere in Italy, but I have no evidence of this.

[@johnmountney1776]

Good show. It would be better to narrate instead of sub title. cant read and watch tv at the same time

[@fcalvaresi]

john mountney Everyone in the world can do it to watch a show in English, I am sure English speakers can too :)

[@victorcano1289]

That is how non native speakers learned english in the first place, when I was a child and learned to read, most of the movies only had subtitles and I could not understand english.

[@thedevilneveraskstwice7027]

Everyone elected to the highest tzarist soviet by 1815? :D Oh cmon.

[@RankingCero95]

soviet means council haha nothing to do with URSS

[@Viktors633]

24:00

[@abc64pan]

Anybody notice how peoples inhabiting regions within the largest land masses in the world have been the slowest to develop? In contrast, those inhabiting smaller land masses such as Europe for instance, tended to develop faster. France and Germany, both located within the relatively small European landmass, were so advanced that they posed a serious threat to Russia, much more backwards and occupying the much larger Asian land mass. Same goes for China, backwards in many ways, also located in the large Asian land mass and Japan, comparatively advanced, located within a relatively smaller group of islands.

[@maligjokica]

when you say like that its sound (and it is) very simple but its much more complicated then that. I will recomend you to look Jared Dajmond in his book why societies colaps and guns, germa and steal.

[@abc64pan]

maligjokica I saw Guns, Germs, and Steel and recall that it was mentioned that natives of some of the world's largest land masses such as Africa, North America, and South America tended to develop societies generally at a slower rate than those of the "Fertile Triangle" (Mediterranean Middle East) and Europe which happen to be relatively smaller land masses. A detailed explanation was also given. I know it's complicated, but geography seems to be a big factor in determining the rate of human development.

[@Unit987654321]

Because those countries with large land masses tended to be invaded often for their resources, leaving the population living in those large countries to have to rebuild their country from the ground up over and over again.

[@georgevlavianos1401]

hammertapping Tetigisti acu (You hit the nail on the head)

[@ihl0700677525]

_"peoples inhabiting regions within the largest land masses in the world have been the slowest to develop? In contrast, those inhabiting smaller land masses such as Europe for instance, tended to develop faster."_ Wrong. It isn't always that way. Thousands of years ago, advanced civilizations exists in China, India, and middle east. People in Mesopotamia, Egypt, Persia, and India build great cities and colossal monuments thousands of years before the Greek and the Roman. In fact, European superiority is/was quite recent, in the last 300 or so years. Before that, even in Roman heyday, there were civilizations in the east that were as strong and as advanced as anything the west can offer. Of course today we have the US, and China (both of which inhabit "large landmasses") as world superpowers while European countries are merely regional powers.

[@perseus6107]

damn ruskies

[@Братецревольвер]

and what did you expect, he-he-he?