Just how the British nobles speak are just so elegantly tried. "Stupid?" "Ill-thought."
@AbrahamLincoln43 жыл бұрын
So polite.
@SStupendous2 жыл бұрын
@@AbrahamLincoln4 Did you actually write Major Marquis Warren that letter Old Abe?
@lazyidiotofthemonth2 жыл бұрын
Pretty Sure Victoria spoke with a pronounced German Accent.
@althesmith Жыл бұрын
I would highly doubt it. She was fluent in German but grew up speaking only English at home.@@lazyidiotofthemonth
@lazyidiotofthemonth Жыл бұрын
@@althesmith Not really, the Royal family, remained ethnically German until WWI. They spoke German at home during Victoria's reign.
@VolumedMusicMan4 жыл бұрын
Queen Victoria‘s daughter was married to the son of the Kaiser in Germany, while her daughter-in-law was from Denmark. She did not want to rock anyone’s boat.
@marschallblucher61974 жыл бұрын
Germany or Prussia? This is 1864 so Germany still hasn't formed yet.
@milaandersson68083 жыл бұрын
@@marschallblucher6197 Prussia, she even gave birth to the successor if im not mistaken
@dantobarbarian48423 жыл бұрын
Inbred royals caused WW1!
@musculusiv41723 жыл бұрын
@@milaandersson6808 I think she was the mother of Willhelm II no?
@DMDSFrazzles3 жыл бұрын
@@musculusiv4172 Grandmother of Wilhelm II.
@rwc193904 жыл бұрын
Fun Fact: Palmerston in "1864"was played by James Fox, while a younger version of Palmerston in "Victoria" (2019) was played by his son Laurence Fox.
@avkezramos11603 жыл бұрын
Nice😃
@danielefatima94453 жыл бұрын
Wow so nice! Good know. Thanks
@JakobSeidl3 жыл бұрын
Palmerston would have 80 years old here tho. Great actor but a bit too young
@SStupendous2 жыл бұрын
@@JakobSeidl I forgot that guy was Biden's age in the 1860s, the guy looked really young for his age today
@decannerlin59502 жыл бұрын
wow
@AbrahamLincoln44 жыл бұрын
"I'm missing my afternoon tea" I love the British.
@cobbvd4 жыл бұрын
The most treacherous nation of Europe...
@themac22384 жыл бұрын
cobbvd I would say Italy is the most actually
@nulnoh2193 жыл бұрын
Lord "Don't talk to me before my Coffee (Tea)" Pamerston.
@cobbvd3 жыл бұрын
@@theholmes8308 I am Lithuanian. And I am interested in history.
@blackkray11682 жыл бұрын
@@cobbvd oh do fuck off back to what ever bogtrodden shit hole you call a country and take your anti british sentiment with you
@Siptom3693 жыл бұрын
It was a needless conflict that was started by denmark
@WatcherMovie0083 жыл бұрын
Denmark: We promise not to harass, violate, or remove the traditions of Danish Germans living in Schleswig. Also Denmark: *proceeds ot harass, violate, and remove the traditions of Danish Germans living in Schleswig* Bismarck: Hippity hoppity, your Schleswig is now my Schleswig.
@derherrgraf60013 жыл бұрын
Actually this war was a important step for the unification of the german empire.
@SStupendous2 жыл бұрын
@@derherrgraf6001 Yes that's true, but who said it was not? It's not as significant as many other conflicts in the Wars of Unification mind you.
@realdragao6367 Жыл бұрын
Luckily germany lost ww1 and denmark got it’s land back from the stupid bastard krauts
@bear5730 Жыл бұрын
"Palmerston...you're being witty! :]" love it lmao
@RealD83 жыл бұрын
It's crazy how much history is because of this woman... Literally to this day...
@TheCurlsCrazy3 жыл бұрын
and how much hemophilia
@Bulacanos2 жыл бұрын
What an... ill-thought out statement
@jekabsojarsulskis97402 жыл бұрын
@@TheCurlsCrazy mama mia, that's a lot of blood! In all seriousness, it sucked to be queen Victoria's descendants because of hemophilia. I believe several people from her family died from it.
@Lesboi2 жыл бұрын
@@jekabsojarsulskis9740 Yeah her grandson (Son of Russian Tsar) had the disease you mentioned so too weak to survive on his own coz wounds would not heal lol so was not able to escape in the Revolution
@iain.sm.cАй бұрын
She was the grandmother of Europe. By the time of her death many of the European aristocracy were related to her. It's what added a level of absurdity to WW1, as George V, Wilhelm II were cousins.
@briantime37623 жыл бұрын
Pitt the elder!
@dominiquemonteiro7543 жыл бұрын
Lord PALMERSTON!
@nicholasrogers72762 жыл бұрын
Pitt the elder
@EJAXK132 жыл бұрын
Oh that’s it! 👊😡
@SchizoidMan1989 Жыл бұрын
@@EJAXK13 Yeah, that showed him, Barney! *scoffs* Pitt the Elder.
@karllykos Жыл бұрын
LORD PALMERSTON! 👊
@yeettheheat3 жыл бұрын
"There are only 3 People..." Otto von Bismarck: "Entschuldigung was zum Fick?"
@jamesbay1153 жыл бұрын
Real quote from Palmerston too 😂 he was probably wrong but god I love that quote, gets the point across too
@markschoning55813 жыл бұрын
Sorry but this pun is not working in German. Nobody would say „Was zum Fick“ (what the Fuck) in German. We only use the word Fuck ( der Fick) in a sexual meaning, and not as a normal smear word!
@MrGreenTabasco3 жыл бұрын
@@markschoning5581 Mark, I'm afraid the constant development of the german language has gotten the better of you. "Was zum fick" is not only a used phrase, it also is already used in Art. Take for example "WZF" from Das Lumpenpack. Also, in the end it is just a different version from "Was zum Teufel" and "Was zum Geier."
@markschoning55813 жыл бұрын
@@MrGreenTabasco Ich kenne Niemanden der den Ausdruck „was zum Fick“ gebraucht. Aber ich lebe ja auch nur seit meiner Geburt vor 43 Jahren in Deutschland. Ich habe also weder von der Deutschen Sprache noch den Zuständen in Deutschland irgendwelche tieferen Kenntnisse.
@markschoning55813 жыл бұрын
@@MrGreenTabasco Übrigens, „Das Lumpenpack“ musste ich erst mal Googeln. Von denen hatte ich bisher noch nie etwas gehört. Ich glaube zu recht. Welche Ausdrücke von irgendwelchen infantilen Mitgliedern einer unbedeutenden deutschen Rockband benutzt werden, geht mir am Allerwertesten vorbei.
@taotaozhang4568 Жыл бұрын
I bet Wade Boggs would say Pitt the Elder would’ve done a better job
@bluedragontoybash246311 ай бұрын
Barney : Lord Palmerston !!
@adamcheklat73874 жыл бұрын
1:32: Stupid, Ill-thought out, same thing.
@ironcladstudios9714 жыл бұрын
They are the same thing, but knowing them Victorian Brits, they'd want to make it sound as *polite* as possible, even for something as stupid as what the Danes were thinking.
@elizabethmiller79183 жыл бұрын
This Danish movie is pretty + good honest What people dont realize the Danish Army was actually slightly bigger than Prussia's at the time and on top of this Denmark had a real Navy, which Prussia mostly lacked. At the time Denmark was considered one of the preeminent military powers of Northern Europe. And they (thought) they had England as an ally and so that it would all be a cakewalk. So they recklessly provoked a war with Pussia by breaking the Schleswig treaty ( which stipulated they could not abuse the german population of that province and forced them to not speak german etc) and sent provocative missives to the Prussia King. But the Prussians had made quite a few improvements to the firepower of thier Army and the effectiveness of theirs leadership, so they were quite confident and did not mind a Danish attack at all since they ere eager to use their expensive military to improve their standing in Europe and among the german states. Also, as the Prussians expected, England abandoned the Danes, since they were the ones who broke the treaty and on top of that the Austrians sent generous help to the Prussians. The Danish movie is quite honest about all these things. Ultimately the war was decided by Prussian artillery which was quite superior and so more than made up that Denmark's military was slightly larger. Prussian and Austrian "Special Forces" (for the time) the Deaths head Hussars also contributed out of proportion to their numbers. On top of that the Prussians had the better generalship and staffs and so in the end it was a crushing defeat for the Danes. Denmark would never again be considered a powerful country in Europe.
@noobster47792 жыл бұрын
Except you forgot one minor, VERY IMPORTANT POINT: Denmark wasnt at war with Prussia, Denmark was at war with the entire german confederation. That included basically all former HRE states still around and both Prussia and Austria. There was no realistic way Denmark could ever win that war in any scenario. Prussia was the one doing the main fighting, but they were basically only the first wave do to beeing the closest one. Austria could never allow Denmark to annex slesvig-holstein because ti would absolutely destroy their prestige in the german confederationa s leader and protector of all germans. And the danish naval advantage was literally meaningless. The german confederation states didnt have big navies for the last 1000 years and had no problem without them do to their trade beeing reliant on land routes. Also the territory in question and half of Denmark were perfectly accesible by land to any german confederation army with nothing the danish anvy could do. The germans could occupy all of Jutland with the danish fleet watching pointlessly. Dont overplay the danish strengths. They would have already lost the first slesvig war if it wasnt for the minor fact the german confederation was literally dealing with a major revolution in the middle of it (And Asutria literally nearly falling apart with the Hungarian revolt). Danish hebris after their first victory cost them dearly now when the german confederationw as actually able to focus on them and Denmark got crushed. Even if Britain helped Denmark the land power advantage would still easily be in favour of the german confederation and a victory would be the forgon conclusion. Britain didnt have a land army strong enough to oppose both Prussia and Austria on land in europe for a long time (and it would be literally go against the policy of non intervention of the status quo in europe if it isnt questioned) The only saving for Denmark would be an intervention by Russia or France on their side do to both having significant land armies to actually fight this war. But both were busy with other things and Denmark was the aggressor. And I propably dont have to point out what a huge oral boost to any german force it would have been if France joined the war, Napoleon was still a very fresh memory for a lot of people and France joining an aggressor against a german state would be propaganda suicide. Even the pro France states like Bavaria would have joined Prussia in that scenario.
@elizabethmiller79182 жыл бұрын
@@noobster4779 Your not wrong. Nonetheless the bulk of the fighting in this war was done by Prussian troops and most call it the Danish -Prussian war not the Danish-german war. But all your points are 100% correct however i was not going to go to that level on granularity in my post. I would have lost of a lot of folks with that.
@therealmrfishpaste2 жыл бұрын
And the Danes had won the first Schleswig war only a decade earlier...they thought they could repeat it.
@zelemas30622 жыл бұрын
In 1860 Prussias Army had roughly 160.000 man, excluding the small prussian navy. There was no time after the napoleonic wars where Denmark had more soldiers than Prussia. In peace-times Denmark had a land-army with 7.500 troops (excluding navy). In this war Denmark had 36.000 soldiers (excluding navy) fighting & 18.000 replacement and garrison-troops. Prussia (and Austria, not to forget them) sent 61.000 soldiers and additional 20.000 soldiers later (25% austrian troops). So please tell us where you got the knowledge of more than 160.000 danish soldiers in this time (so that the danish army could have been "slightly bigger" as you wrote...)...
@joemammon6149 Жыл бұрын
war is like trial by combat where fighting cuts through the Gordian Knot of complicated legal matters. and the side with the most firepower wins.
@jedder3 жыл бұрын
I wonder how much time they spent writing those palm leaves into that scene.
@kemodoemenem25872 жыл бұрын
The palm leaves were a great addition.
@MyLateralThawts Жыл бұрын
The Danish were counting on British support? How soon they forgot about the Battle of Copenhagen.
@ioannisAss2 жыл бұрын
I can see this conversation happening today over Ukraine
@alissonlares29262 жыл бұрын
Incredible how the queen was already alive and in the throne at this time too. Amazing.
@votesus98192 жыл бұрын
???
@TheMrPeteChannel Жыл бұрын
She was queen until 1901.
@alissonlares2926 Жыл бұрын
@@TheMrPeteChannel no. She died last year.
@rcgunner7086 Жыл бұрын
@@TheMrPeteChannel Alisson is making fun about how old Queen Elizabeth II was.
@KForrest-gd1nj5 ай бұрын
@@votesus9819 ???
@Investing_WithDrake_Culver Жыл бұрын
James Fox playing as Lord Palmerston looks similar to John Gielgud when he played in The Charge of the Light Brigade
@LoudaroundLincoln Жыл бұрын
I can see what you mean.
@thesmithersy2 жыл бұрын
LOOOORRRRDDDD PALMERSTON!
@roamer13892 жыл бұрын
PITT THE ELDER!!
@dannythomas4174 жыл бұрын
That’s Mr. Salt.
@nee76174 жыл бұрын
😶😶
@dannythomas4174 жыл бұрын
@Dtje The one from the 2005 Chocolate Factory. Actor’s name is James Fox.
@ToxicKingMad Жыл бұрын
Would’ve never happened under Pitt Thee Elder
@ACk-vu6ik2 жыл бұрын
Film Name?
@pelace2 жыл бұрын
“The Russians send cannons and we send our sympathies”
@mramir88922 жыл бұрын
I think its prussian .-. Not russian
@thanhhoangnguyen47542 жыл бұрын
@@mramir8892 it is Prussian. It was because of the Danes broke the treaty that Bismarck send the Danes canon
@lavozdelsur16810 ай бұрын
it's very interesting to me to know our enemy; the brits had a strong foot on Germany before its unification, and they tried to pursue their interests until the end. Very clever and always through someone else, like they do even today. Their ways of geopolitics haven't changed in centuries.
@icedsushi79572 жыл бұрын
What's the name of the movie?
@SStupendous2 жыл бұрын
1864.
@Aristocles22 Жыл бұрын
Lord Palmerston! Yeah, "Pitt the Elder".
@johnpoole3871 Жыл бұрын
Pitt the Elder would have stopped Bismarck.
@hi23nutzer214 ай бұрын
Stopped Bismarck in doing what?
@RoyalMale1 Жыл бұрын
what film is this from??
@kasperrzuelow Жыл бұрын
Its a Danish serie and movie called: 1864
@geoffreyhansen85433 жыл бұрын
Interesting insight.
@danielefatima94453 жыл бұрын
Where I can find this movie? And how is title? Thanks!
@lolitaescol13743 жыл бұрын
1864
@gainmelk3 жыл бұрын
Had they heard her Majesty's remarks there, the Danes would have lined up to have a fat sardine-infused movement on said remarks.
@nndiaadadf50583 жыл бұрын
Movie?
@kasperrzuelow3 жыл бұрын
m.imdb.com/title/tt1753353/
@aztroboy14503 жыл бұрын
Actually it's a Mini Series
@mariolucatoni87553 жыл бұрын
@@aztroboy1450 1864?
@aztroboy14503 жыл бұрын
@@mariolucatoni8755 yup
@Coco3Pirata11 ай бұрын
Actually queen victoria wasnt that old😅, her age is 27 in 1864 She should look young
😂😂😂😂Suck it up European 🤡, we were the number one power then and jealously is a wonderful thing.
@gungdegalang46359 ай бұрын
"daddy i want that squirrel"
@EJAXK139 ай бұрын
See people. England’s greatest prime minister is Lord Palmerston!
@hiddenfan-377 ай бұрын
Barney approves this comment.
@croonyerzoonyer2 жыл бұрын
Poor casting for Victoria. She was only in her 40’s here. Looks like she’s in her 60’s.
@night6724 Жыл бұрын
Probably because old lady Victoria is more recognizable. Like how in "The Buccaneer" Andrew Jackson has gray hair even though at the time he still had reddish-brown hair. Also there aren't many pictures of her in her 40s since after Prince Albert died she became a recluse
@Coco3Pirata11 ай бұрын
actually she is 27yrs old or 30s because she was born in 1837 and the 2nd schleswig war happened in 1864
@KForrest-gd1nj4 ай бұрын
@@Coco3Pirata it was 1819 when her majesty was born