I once had a 1934 Nash1280. Four door sedan with twin ignition. Great car.
@shwt1214 жыл бұрын
This is an EXCELLENT Video !! As they said, you are an incredible historian..!!!! Thank you.
@leightonsonny65163 жыл бұрын
instablaster
@edwardhanson3664 Жыл бұрын
During the 1950s every car in the Superman comics were Nashes.
@chrisjeffries23224 жыл бұрын
I remember our friends 1952 Nash 2 door wagon, with the lolly pop shifter.
@hwcmdls79054 жыл бұрын
My brother has a 58 Rambler American Super. Those and the metropolitans were the last cars to feature the Nash bathtub styling. Beautiful cars that were ahead of their time. The heat still works in my brothers car too so they were reliable.
@robertk.5195 Жыл бұрын
OK video if you're a capable speed-reader!
@bobburbach22533 жыл бұрын
My dad had a Nash deaIership in the 50`s
@AzraelEnterprise3 жыл бұрын
Okay, that's pretty cool.
@fundamentos34392 жыл бұрын
Great cars. I remember the revolutionary lines of the early 1950's models . Vehicles that lasted a lifetime. Thank you for sharing.
@michaelbenardo5695 Жыл бұрын
That blue woodie sedan is not merely a "4 door sedan", this is the Nash Sedan Suburban. You should call it as such.
@cliffweatherbee6914 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. It helped me put a sense of time to a lot of models.
@georgeelmerdenbrough69064 жыл бұрын
I am a 70s gen -X er but I have always loved 30s music ..i can't be the only one , eh ?.
@shwt1214 жыл бұрын
No, you're not.....I love the older stuff, too.....& also big band stuff, as well.
@gerard48672 жыл бұрын
Born in 56. I do too
@alanblanes28764 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! You are a great historian.
@Kinseydsp3 жыл бұрын
Thank YOU FOR THIS!
@AzraelEnterprise3 жыл бұрын
You're so welcome!
@michaelbenardo5695 Жыл бұрын
Before the war, the Nash was also available with 8 cylinders. OHV unit in the Ambassador, in the early 30s, a lower priced car with a flathead straight 8 as well. Nash really harmed themselves in not bringing the OHV version back from the war. By 1947, 8 cylinder cars outsold 6s, let by Ford, Mercury, Buick, and Pontiac.
@BeingRomans829ed3 жыл бұрын
Good video but wish it had moved slower so we could see the pictures longer and have longer to think about the inscriptions written in between. Screen goes dark upon pause so pause doesn’t help.
@AzraelEnterprise3 жыл бұрын
I fixed the speed issue on more recent videos.
@manoelteixeira49363 жыл бұрын
manoel tei Um automóvel maravilhoso, confortável e diferenciado dos aoutros de sua época. Meu saudoso pai tinha um preto 1950, era uma nave sem igual na época, tenho saudades daqueles tempos que passou sem que eu e muitos perceberam. maneco - Porto Alegre-RS - Brasil.
@communismman14714 жыл бұрын
It's quite a shame my grandfathers 1947 Nash burned down our garage with a 1956 Chevrolet
@andrewwanner68294 жыл бұрын
It was great to see the 1956 at the end but the 1957 was truly nice and a better way to end the marque than the concurrent Hudson.
@jackgoldstein22543 жыл бұрын
I enjoyed watching this video. I've known many people over the years who said that Nashes were good cars, except for one of my uncles, who called the Airflytes "overinflated balloons". It's a shame that Mason's dream couldn't come true, to merge Nash and Hudson with Studebaker and Packard. These names likely would have been around a lot longer, but I don't believe that James Nance at S-P ever would've agreed to it. At least Studebaker held on a while, till 1966. And AMC lasted until 1987
@edarcuri1829 ай бұрын
Mason's "dream" bit Packard on the derriere. Studebaker was a financial boat anchor. They could make cars, and could have been a bigger player in trucks had they done so, but Studebaker couldn't make money. Lots of factors in that, but AMC prospered while Packard and, then, Studebaker sank. Management decisions, among other things, clouded Studebaker's future. Had they the correct decision makers, Studebaker might still be with us.
@tomsnj4 жыл бұрын
Graphics moved way too quickly. No time to read or look at pictures.
@AzraelEnterprise4 жыл бұрын
If you've missed something, just re-watch it. jk
@wessmith74084 жыл бұрын
@@AzraelEnterprise THAT WAS THE MOST STUPID ANSWER YOU COULD HAVE POSTED. FOR THAT I GIVE YOU A THUMBS DOWN. READ THE COMMENT I'M ABOUT TO POST AT THE HEAD OF THIS PRESENTATION!
@lowellangell8392 жыл бұрын
Please tell me the name of the last song. It has a beautiful organ melody. I would like to get the keyboard music for it.
@lowellangell8392 жыл бұрын
Ah, I found it. Carroll Park by John Deley and the 41 players. It's in the youtube audio library. My dad had a 57 Nash. It had what they called hardtop convertible windows. There was no center post between the back seat windows and the front seat windows. It had the cool hood ornament and a V8. The seats also made down into a bed, though that never got used. I demolished a 1960 Rambler American of his in a car accident. It had an overdrive that made it more fuel efficient on the highway. The 57 Nash also had 4 headlights with the high beam using all four.
@msgfrmdaactionman30002 жыл бұрын
My Grandpappy would say, if you don't want to make it in a Nash, you got no A$$.
@edarcuri1829 ай бұрын
Nash, and its predecessors and successors, was one of two US automakers never to go bankrupt. Ford (Henry's third try) is the other. The 1953 delivery wagon shown is not a 1953 model.
@AzraelEnterprise9 ай бұрын
Ford was Henry's first and he was forced out by investors and then joined up with Ransom Oldsmobile. And Packard never went bankrupt either.
@edarcuri1829 ай бұрын
@@AzraelEnterprise Ford was forced out of the Henry Ford Company (not bankrupt) which became Cadillac. I was unaware of the Pakcard history. There may be others as so many of the early companies ceased to exist long before I was born! Thanks for the info. on Packard.
@AzraelEnterprise9 ай бұрын
@@edarcuri182 Packard merged with Nash-Kelvinator and Hudson to create American Motors Corporation. Then AMC got bought out by Chrsyler and turned int Eagle, which was discontinued a decade later.
@edarcuri1829 ай бұрын
@@AzraelEnterprise If I was intending to make up a false history, I could do better than that. Packard did not "merge" with another company. They bought Studebaker which could make cars but could not make money. In 1956, with Curtiss Wright running Studebaker Packard, production of Packard automobiles in Detroit ended. thereafter, Packard models continued as variants of Studebaker designs produced in South Bend, Indiana for 1957 and 1958. There has not been a Packard marque produced in series since. American Motors was the new name given to Nash-Kelvinator after that company merged with Hudson. The last Nash and Hudson automobiles were produced in 1957. There had been some thought given to adding Packard, and possibly Studebaker, to the American Motors combine earlier, but by mid-1954 those thoughts diminshed and were abandoned entirely after CW took charge at Studebaker and George Romney became CEO at AMC. There were a number of factors involved in eachof those decisions which you, or I, might have made differently. No one called me! 😁
@AzraelEnterprise8 ай бұрын
If I was involved in it, there would have been a W9 engine used in the AMX II and it would have been released!
@seanangellmusic2 жыл бұрын
Who is the band in the last song?
@AzraelEnterprise2 жыл бұрын
It's Carol Park by John Deley and the 41 Players.
@FloridanJays2 жыл бұрын
Why does this look like the Chrysler airflow? 2:28
@michaelbenardo5695 Жыл бұрын
It in no way looks like an Airflow.
@atirador434fsantos2 жыл бұрын
KKKKKK Tenho um Nash 600 47, no Brasil, q cortei pra picape por conta da deterioração de toda carroceria, cujas melhores partes aproveitei pra compor a picape, fazendo chassis e adaptando mecânica atualizada!
@warrenny5 жыл бұрын
Lol. I love this jazz music, but the powerpoint style video is.....not good.