I'm the seller that sold these boards on Ebay (electronics-plus). When I sold out of them in 2 days I figured that someone had posted a blog or youtube video about this board :) I'm glad they are still useful for parts 50 years after they were manufactured. Great video and thanks for the business everyone!
@laverdanick2 ай бұрын
I’ve found a couple of adverts online from 1981. The Navtec Hyperloc 1000, was an interface/remote for existing Loran C receivers and could be used to display, distance and bearing to waypoint, ground speed and other features.
@jgc36202 ай бұрын
Look like to me as a LORAN C receiver for use in the maritime field. Receiver is a 100KHz analog.
@radarmusen2 ай бұрын
Exactly my thoughts was thinking of the bendix KNS 660 system seeing this.
@AppliedCryogenics2 ай бұрын
The US did have Transit (aka NAVSAT) in the 1960's. It relied on doppler shifts from radio transmitters passing overhead. (They didn't launch an actual GPS satellite until 1979.)
@ChrisSmith-tc4df2 ай бұрын
Like many, an 8085 job later taken over by the 8051 once it came onto the scene.
@RideGasGas2 ай бұрын
There is some court action where Raytheon and Navtec are involved that mentions LORAN C. It appears that Navtec went bankrupt and Raytheon was trying to have the rights and royalties assigned to them. But yeah, a LORAN C product as others have noted seems to be the most likely answer.
@ivolol2 ай бұрын
In the book "Exactly" by Simon Winchester (I think it'd be SUPER up your ally actually, also available on audible) he talks about when young being entrusted with navigating a oil platform pulling tug into the best match of coordinates possible for anchoring, as previously established by geologists, for drilling. In that time it was using land-based radio networking for trilateration; before GPS. I think in the process of explaining the complexities of GPS itself. So this might be a similar system. I'd guess it can do phase tracking of two different signals. You might be able to find some interesting signals at the ends of the analog circuits, although maybe they'd need to be receiving particular transmissions. Nowadays with GPS existing, you could use this and some comparators to make a GPSDO with PLL, comparators might be able to do that
@ats891172 ай бұрын
“640K ought to be enough for anybody.”
@bborkzilla2 ай бұрын
I built a repeater controller around an 8085 for a grad project at university in 1988. That's still one of my favorite microprocessors.
@herbertsusmann9862 ай бұрын
I also was going to say 100 kHz Loran C based on the chunky magnetic parts on that analog board. Would make sense for a marine navigation system of some sort. Now one could do so much more with modern microprocessor etc. Still for 1979 that was pretty state of the art.
@romancharak36752 ай бұрын
That sounds like a very interesting project !
@johnwest79932 ай бұрын
The transformers on the analog bd are impedance matching the high impedance of a relatively short receive antenna to the receiver's input stage, because you have a LORAN C positioning receiver working at 100 kHz, receiving high-power coastal transmitter positioning signals from around the world, from a time before the satellite-based GPS network took over. Towards the end of the system's life they were also used by pilots. I tried to convert one to receive WWVB at 60 kHz, but it was more trouble than simply building a TRF receiver for the frequency ref and then decoding the amplitude switching data for the time.
@bayareapianist2 ай бұрын
Have fun with that as you said.
@TheLemonhawk2 ай бұрын
They also had satellite navigation via the Navy transit satellites, not unusual for Loran C and transit sat nav to be combined.
@milloons28472 ай бұрын
Nice. You have the main parts to make a INTEL SDK85 evaluation board. My 1st steps into assembly and mnemonics back in 1977 ...
@mikesradiorepair2 ай бұрын
I seem to remember GPS becoming available to the civilian world after a commercial South Korean plane got shot down by Russia in 1983 or 1984.
@ricksharpe68952 ай бұрын
While LORAN is a strong candidate it’s also possible this was from an OMEGA receiver which gave worldwide coverage for both ships and aircraft.
@pgqneto2 ай бұрын
What operating system do comercial airplanes use, or if not, what programming language is used on them?
@lelandclayton54622 ай бұрын
I would hook up a serial terminal and see if it outputs anything on the RS232.
@X-OR_2 ай бұрын
There still on ebay: Great Parts Board
@lelandclayton54622 ай бұрын
Got a link? I want to get one.
@edgeeffect2 ай бұрын
GPS might not have been round then but what about INMARSAT and stuff like that..... and people on here keep reminding us of TRANSIT too.
@lizardkeeper1002 ай бұрын
I just googled this so it might be wrong but apparently navtech invented gps in 1973 with the help of the military so I would guess this device uses gps.
@mnoxman2 ай бұрын
GPS circa 1979 would have been military only. Loran and Omega would have been the only "civilian" choices. The transistors are way to slow to be GPS. 2n2221 tops out at 300Mhz unless you make a mixer to put GPS 1.1-1.6 ghz signals down to a 300mhz but you'd need one really good transistor.
@mr1enrollment2 ай бұрын
if you ever want to dispose the 10.000mhz osc part,... let me know
@GeorgeGraves2 ай бұрын
Why would you put the clock all the way on the opposite side of the board? Seems like a fast signal that you would want next to the CPU, no?
@IMSAIGuy2 ай бұрын
used for the navigation hardware decoding first. the 10MHz goes to the other size and is divided by two before the uP uses it.
@bayareapianist2 ай бұрын
I remember 8085 needed 2x clock speed to run. Maybe it was a 2.5 MHz chip. Z80 clock was 1 to 1.
@Spookieham2 ай бұрын
5mhz clock isn't really fast enough to make a difference
@bayareapianist2 ай бұрын
@@Spookieham back in 70s, it was like 5GHz CPU vs 2.5GHz.
@edgeeffect2 ай бұрын
Don't add RAM... it's more fun with less than 1K to work in. ;)
@nickcaruso2 ай бұрын
LORAN maybe?
@douro202 ай бұрын
That's a TCXO not an OCXO...
@mikesradiorepair2 ай бұрын
Looks like a OCXO (oven controlled crystal oscillator) to me. TCXO's (temperature compensated crystal oscillator) tend to be much much smaller because they do not have a "oven" box to heat the crystal.
@IMSAIGuy2 ай бұрын
they can be small: kzbin.info/www/bejne/e5qkpImYjr6XkJIsi=YqJSl_OvKFuhoTPx