1972 Chevrolet Nova SS

[@stanmendoza7871]

Looks like a 1969 year to me.... interesting no back window cranks, I kinda like that! What a beautiful Nova!

[@PhantomPix]

I have a 69 ss.I always roll those windows down while driving.

[@robertjewsbury3212]

Outside, it’s modeled after a 68 as there’s no gender gills present. The side marker lights are 68-69.

[@Joey500]

COULDNT HAVE PICKED A DULLER COLOR.

[@malcolmyost7794]

Your Nova is a good looking car you always do a great job showing the cars I always look forward to seeing them and what you have in stock. Its a beauty Your Nova.

[@johnungate1782]

Nice hot rod,easy on the rev's

[@PhantomPix]

Bumper, fenders ,quarters, and rear lights all 69 . No rear window cranks installed after rebuild.💁weird.. still nice build.

[@markg7030]

It looks like a 1969. The 396 Nova was dropped for 1971 and 1972. I did not think you could bore out a 396 to get 100 extra cubic inches. It looks really nice but what is going on here?

[@Transient901]

How much cylinder wall is left after boring a 4.094 inch hole to 4.310 inch??? Do the pistons have ore's?

[@carlzalesski2975]

Looks like a 68/69 looking at the tail and marker lights,1970 and newer had big marker lights and wider tail lights.

[@raymondtipton7243]

Yes they did...I have a 71 nova...and a 69 markers and taillights r different

[@anneliesevoelker2502]

Curious as to what happened to my mom's yellow nova. My questions go unanswered your questions go unanswered.

[@andys4610]

Definitely not a 1972 lol 68/69 taillights and 69 side marker emblems

[@HD-cf2fl]

its a 69, 68 the ignition wasnt on the coloumn. was on the dash

[@michaelcunha6155]

Someone needs to clarify tge year of this nova .....asap...per Admin. Ty

[@bowtiebum82]

68-69 quarter panels

[@carlzalesski2975]

Wrong tail lights for a 72

[@HH-pn4ji]

Who did the work on that Nova?

[@jaimecervantes3896]

Nice 👍🏼 nova I think 🤔 the tail lights are out of 69 nova. 🤷🏻‍♂️ 7:36

[@michaelcunha6155]

Rear quarter side markers are clear lens and

[@daviddasilva5260]

Looks like a 69, what's asking price

[@raymondtipton7243]

69.9

[@ronaldlucero4258]

PAPERWORK time.

[@11bravo80]

Lol it wouldn't matter that color didn't exist that year that car is not original but it is the nicest snow I ever seen

[@RickHopfingerJustAddWaterHydro]

69 or not a real ss

[@cubedmack]

Lol, either this guy was told the wrong info or he's lying. This car is has to be a 68 or 69 SS clone. There was no 396 in the SS in 72. 1970 was the last year for 396 and for 71 & 72 SS came with a 350. Car looks great but it ain't worth the money they are asking for.

[@raymondtipton7243]

No it's not....that's a chunk of change

[@darrininverarity4297]

$7000 is a deal

[@cubedmack]

LOL, yeah for a SS clone that's a deal. These people are scammers. Ain't no way in the world this SS clone is worth 69k.

[@raymondtipton7243]

Try 69000

[@raymondtipton7243]

Not original door panels....it's nice. But $70.000.00 too much

[@dsedano1]

Not a '72. It's a '69

[@Bman-xy2vh]

$70,000? I guess there's a sucker born for this car? Y'all are crazy. If this is a '72 they used parts from an older model when they restored it and '72 didn't have a 396 available. I'm saying its got ss badges but not a true ss.💩

[@michaelcunha6155]

This is a 69 Nova only year for red interior ......this guy don't know a 69 from a 72. Jesus h. Christ