1982: Raising of the Mary Rose

[@bobcosmic]

The historical Mary Rose . King Charles III - *The important thing is to be British and not panic so we didn’t, and all is well*

[@carolinecholmodeley8719]

Thank you for this clip .

[@bobcosmic]

@@carolinecholmodeley8719 Thank you for your reply !

[@jeeyaranid994]

👌

[@jeeyaranid994]

👌

[@rocketcab]

.... that may be the best quote I've ever read....

[@Marth281]

What an amazing, Historical Find 😮

[@thomassmith1080]

Hello Caroline. How are you doing?

[@dlouise5680]

God bless King Charles. Always best to think clearly and not to panic. Bravo!

[@russellslaney7098]

I remember this as a child

[@teejay8258]

Anyone who thinks Harry is not his son, needs to watch this!

[@zjmgx-games5647]

was just thinking that, can see it when he’s young

[@lkgrave4959]

Reminds me of when the CSS Hunley was raised but that was a lot smaller compared to the Mary Rose.

[@johnscanlon2598]

Lookup project azorian if your not familiar with it

[@sophiafloyd]

i watched this in school today

[@imicca]

You could say Mary Rose rose again

[@bobbybates2614]

I remember this

[@koksalll]

King's hat has involved in car crash I assume.

[@ROOKTABULA]

Mary Rose from the ocean floor

[@ROOKTABULA]

50 acres of forest used to build the ship.

[@max-nm6qx]

Blessings all great watch here... "THE MAN BEHIND THE MASK"? BY PROFESSOR WALTER VEITH POWERFUL TRUTH.. TRUTH ALWAYS WINS❤️❤️❤️

[@masonjackgrayson1254]

Hi guys

[@veronica1517]

To be British and not to panic! 🤣

[@InYourHeadChangedMan]

If Henry the eight owned it they should have let the ship drop back down in the sea

[@krishnavyas313]

He brought lots of change to England and many of them were positive.

[@ChelyabinskRYTP]

Кто знал что он в будущем будет королем

[@danielleporter1829]

He was born to be king , he was heir to the throne.

[@michellerobin5461]

Everyone? 🙄

[@holdtightadele8017]

Erm… everyone did😂😂🤦🏼‍♂️ He was the heir apparent for 70 years.

[@holdtightadele8017]

The fact they managed to salvage this 400 years later, but cannot salvage the titanic (built in 1912) without destroying it. Shows the level of engineering involved in building the Mary Rose.

[@whiteeaglewarrior]

Mary rose not in very deep water

[@boixgenius]

The Mary rose was at 40 feet underwater. The titanic is at 13,000 feet at the bottom of the Atlantic 💀

[@nessaemma1100]

The reason we don’t touch the titanic is because it is not that old and historic compared to the Mary rose. Historians and anthropologists don’t really give a crap about the titanic compared to the Mary rose. We have so much to learn about how people lived back then, especially during battle, which is when this ship was used. This ship is a piece of history. The titanic is not. We just romanticize it.

[@MonarchistRomanov]

@@nessaemma1100 Not to mention that the titanic is somewhat a memorial for over 1000 men, women and children.

[@mapy4160]

enginer真总appointment doctor 棉北京hospital talk全薄

[@BF4pawntard]

Remember watching the build up to this and was expecting a complete ship . What a waste of time and money

[@MonarchistRomanov]

I personally wouldn't call it a waste of time and money and certainly wouldn't really expect a 500 year old ship that sunk in 1545 to remain intact underwater for a long period of time. Its remarkable most of its superstructure is still intact. A very rare occasion it is to find a perfectly preserved ship made out of wood.