1st Look: Kilo10K Gen2 & Leupold Mk5 2-10

[@KitBadger]

You can find links to everything here : kitbadger.com/1st-look-kilo10k-gen2-leupold-mk5-2-10/ Get your questions answered here : www.patreon.com/KitBadger

[@joquin4618]

That’s a Rich man’s battle rifle right there! 😅 Sure is nice 👍

[@Hiddencomment007]

I'm definitely a leupold fan-man.

[@digitalpunk5365]

Scar 20, cut down, suppressed, drum mag…wow

[@badmitionpro101]

I’m running the same optic on my MARS-H absolutely love it

[@ikemouser2580]

Does the leupold work with nvgs

[@MeMyself-gf7fn]

It would be nice to have some visuals of what they actually look like when looking through them.

[@ethan5.56]

Noice

[@MM-kv8ly]

How heavy is that rifle, fully tricked out with a drum mag etc?

[@andyd9199]

what bipod is that

[@quantum_efficiency]

How was the eyebox on the mk5?

[@BlueDevilBrew]

I’m don’t understand the 2-10 in a world where the 3-18 exists

[@praharin]

Weight

[@BlueDevilBrew]

@@praharin the weight difference is only 2 ounces

[@shaunhull9235]

This is valid, I don’t generally use all the magnification available when shooting. even out to 500-600m I generally find that using the least amount of magnification reduces my reticle “bouncing”. There is a philosophical opinion which is 1x per 100m/yd that was passed on to me years ago, and it seems to apply. But also, that 18x would be very nice for ID purposes.

[@libertyHammerNM]

At 2:07: 65 inch-pounds on your rings? Probably too much torque.

[@MM-kv8ly]

I'm assuming he means the ring base, not the top screws.

[@libertyHammerNM]

@@MM-kv8ly Isn't 65 rather high even for the base screws?

[@georgebarnes9204]

Thats only 5 ft lbs so​@libertyHammerNM

[@BlueDevilBrew]

65 is what Leupold recommends on the IMS mounts at least

[@BJE0719]

68in lbs is also the spec for nightforce rings so its pretty standard.

[@ATF-Agent-007]

This is badass.