I expected to see the Cadillac 4100 and Northstar engines on here, as well as Ford's 5.4L 3 valve
@Mike-w5d4 ай бұрын
I'm gm guy, but I home to 5. 4 one was 2004 super duty 2 valve the other and 2008 3 valve expedition which I still have has 266,000 I'm still going one word and oil change every 3000,3500 miles
@winstonrocco19814 ай бұрын
@@Mike-w5d Just bought a new truck my old truck was a 06 5.4 150 313,000 and still going strong
@dalepeter83924 ай бұрын
@@winstonrocco1981 Agree, my 5.4 3 valve 2003 F250 clocked 195k still a strong work hose.....
@dr.brinebasterd89824 ай бұрын
My 07 f150 5.4 3v almost 200k never been inside the engine.
@Anon543874 ай бұрын
13:16 Utter tripe. Perhaps among those who don't keep anti-freeze in there for its anti-corrosive properties. Those were very reliable and powerful engines, a best of both worlds situation.
@domenicopasquarelli23534 ай бұрын
Wow I thought the diesel 350 engines from the 80s would make the list!
@wymple094 ай бұрын
Properly maintained I've seen them over 300K. Most people who bought them treated them like gas engines.
@AdamVest4 ай бұрын
My dad had one of those that went like 300k miles. The biggest issue (that my dad was tolerant of) was it eating injection pumps. He had the fuel shop on speed dial 😂
@billybudd67764 ай бұрын
Olds 350
@tacoheadmakenzie93114 ай бұрын
@@wymple09What, exactly, is "treating it like a gas engine"?
@wknight55954 ай бұрын
A guy i worked with back then bought one of these and the engine was completely shot at 35k. The car was constantly at the dealership with problems before that and the GM mechanics told him everybody was having major problems with them. idk who this guy is saying he got 300k on one, i think he's confused with a different engine.
@tommyhawks8563 ай бұрын
The sad part is that the manufacturers are now putting out engines that will make these 20 engines look like they were dependable engines.
@terry1411863 ай бұрын
Fords Ecoboost. Absolutely hopeless engines.
@CheapGameModder24 күн бұрын
Wet Timing Belt design is the worst Idea ever. Just to save a gasket
@billvose73604 ай бұрын
I had a 1994 Taurus with the 3.8L V6. I bought it from my former department manager, he had found a crack around freeze plug in the left end of the front cylinder head and fixed it with a rubber expansion plug and retained it with asteel strap, it also had a noisy rod bearing. After about 4 years, it started leaking again, so I bought a used head and installed it. I traded it in 3 years ago, still going strong with the rod bearing and replaced head at 245000 miles.
@Head-c3n4 ай бұрын
Toyota is recalling over 100,000 2022 and 2023 model year Toyota Tundra pickup trucks and Lexus LX SUVs due to a potential engine failure caused by machining debris left in the engine during manufacturing
@WilliamFaehndrich3 ай бұрын
P
@ossieblackmon67404 ай бұрын
Ford 4.2 was a v6 truck engine !
@markchatman95834 ай бұрын
You could get a 4.2L 225ci V8 in a 1980 mustang. Jaguar also used the 4.2 V8 ford engine.
@Pooby10004 ай бұрын
@@markchatman9583 But that whole segment of the video showed F series trucks, so I think they were referring to the 4.2 V6 that came in base model F-150s.
@markchatman95834 ай бұрын
@@Pooby1000 yeah it’s just one of those B-roll videos. The 4.2v8 was a piece of 💩 just like the 4.2 v6.
@jeronronnunkoffunk46914 ай бұрын
I had to play that part back, because I was sure it was v6 helped a buddy out with a F150 that had that engine!😅
@foxbodycougar4 ай бұрын
Was thinking the same thing, then while describing it in f150s shows a brand new raptor, then a 12th gen eco boost and coyote.
@stevel49974 ай бұрын
I got so good at replacing the head gasket in a Chevy Vega engine, I could do the whole job in 35 minutes.
@Keith-rk4td4 ай бұрын
Steel sleeve fixes most Vega engine problems. I squeezed 190hp out of mine with a 4 barrel Holly 390,port and polish head and medium cam grind. It would smoke most stock V8s
@edwardmorriale93584 ай бұрын
@@Keith-rk4tdI am interested in you Vega build. I have a '72 Stinger.
@jeffreysickels19704 ай бұрын
Yeah! Those head gaskets could be problematic. I also threw rods in 2 blocks. To be fair...I beat the hell out of my '75 Vega wagon(I was 21 and it was fun to drive). But they were easy to work on(one can lift the engine out by hand!). I installed a header and a Weber carb and drove it flat-out quite often.
@f.davidbush90934 ай бұрын
My Vega problems were rust out top fenders
@MrRockydee074 ай бұрын
@Keith-rk4td I think Chevy had a recall on the Vegas because of the aluminum cylender walls.....
@paulkurilecz42094 ай бұрын
Did anybody else notice the radial aircraft engine with a missing jug as an example of a failed VW engine?
@mikeywid49544 ай бұрын
@paulkurilecz4209 Yes I did.
@douglasgordon6543 ай бұрын
Pretty funny and a testimony to the authors lack of automotive knowledge
@bryanomicioli33014 ай бұрын
so you forgot the oldsmobile 350 diesel, the triton 5.4 spark plug launcher, the SOHC 4.0 explorer with the nightmare timing chains, the Gen 3 hemi that drops valve seats like its job, the SOHC escort 1.9, same issue, the cadillac catera (the whole car actually)
@Thelongmanable4 ай бұрын
*_FORD SOHC 4.0 WAS ACTUALLY RATED WORSE ENGINE DESIGN FOR THOSE YEARS..._*
@600wheel2 ай бұрын
@@Thelongmanableno need to yell😂
@juggydizzle9114 ай бұрын
Ford 4.2 v8 in an f150? Never heard of it. I think you meant v6.
@davidbates46224 ай бұрын
4.6
@slickmechanical3 ай бұрын
@@davidbates4622 yeah but the 4.6 was a great motor. The 4.2 V6 sucked
@stephenspilker93344 ай бұрын
just goes to show you they make these engines far to complicated. give me a plain old 60's engine everytime.
@northdakotaham17524 ай бұрын
The 3.5 litre Ford V6 with the waterpump inside the engine. WTH were they thinking...duh!!
@toysoldier465523 ай бұрын
That was a "bring it back to dealership" service thing. They planned on us having to bring it in to the dealer to have that water pump replaced. Planned obsoletion of vehicles has been a thing since the mid to late 80's.
@northdakotaham17522 ай бұрын
@@toysoldier46552 I think it goes back alot farther than the 80s. The emissions requirements was a double edge sword. Getting the lead out of gasoline eventually helped engines stay clean longer...but other emissions demand zapped the hp at the same time.
@davelowets4 ай бұрын
9:38... Huh? When did ANY G-body Regal have a 3.1 engine in it?? 🤦🏻🤦🏻♀️🤦🏻♂️
@peted52174 ай бұрын
Ya , Gutless Wonder. Poster child for least HP per CID !
@rickheaton91364 ай бұрын
W body regal
@pacificperformanceautomoti314 ай бұрын
Remember fords spitting out spark plugs
@jonathanritch46384 ай бұрын
My Crown Vic literaly shot one through the hood
@johnhobson88864 ай бұрын
I got pretty damn good at catching them 😊 !
@craigmatheson27364 ай бұрын
Made in Triton, (I believe) Michigan. Hence the name TRITON ENGINE.
@BatoDj4 ай бұрын
Yeah the fords loved shooting the spark plugs out
@kurtzimmerman16374 ай бұрын
they still do!
@research9034 ай бұрын
The 1970s Vega engine should be at the top of this list.
@MrMustangMan20053 ай бұрын
my sister had one of those.... ran forever.!!!!!!!!
@truthbetold99233 ай бұрын
Junked the 4 cylinder replaced with a 350 V8 out of a 72 Chevy truck and would smoke quite a few muscle cars 😁
@MrMustangMan20053 ай бұрын
@@truthbetold9923 i guess so.!!!!! i've heard of a few people doing that....
@christhevancura91133 ай бұрын
I had one too, it leaked oil so much ..We used to joke it had a self changing oil system. 😅 I drove that car for 3 years, and when it finally quit I sold it to a guy who put a 327 in it.
@josephpacchetti59974 ай бұрын
I remember most of these, Thank's for posting.👍🇺🇸
@charlesdiggs52974 ай бұрын
I never heard of a Ford 4.2 v8 especially in the F150
@onewhoknowsrevenge68073 ай бұрын
1997 to 2008--F150 and F250's--Junk
@JBrletic-v2i4 ай бұрын
Should have just called this Engines with best chance of blowing a head gasket.
@m.g.5404 ай бұрын
Triumph stag V8, yet it shows the ex GM Buick/Rover V8, WTF???
@petervanoers36274 ай бұрын
de eerste motor is een rover 3500cc,die tweede is de slechte Triumph motor,wat een hel was dat
@jeffreypierce14404 ай бұрын
The 305 chevy v-8 was a great engine when properly maintained.
@williampowell27223 ай бұрын
had 400k on mine
@toysoldier465523 ай бұрын
Mine died at 469k, ran like a champ until it decided it was time to retire.
@brianhawk69793 ай бұрын
Reliable just no power
@jeffreypierce14403 ай бұрын
@@brianhawk6979 They had enough power for a sedan. They moved the 80's impala and caprice along just fine and got great gas mileage.
@davemilligan11713 ай бұрын
@@brianhawk6979 Having them in a 5 speed manual felt like a power boost.
@Shawn_the_Protogen4 ай бұрын
No Northstar engines? No Cummins killer dowel pin? No Vulcan V6? Missed potential at a bunch of headaches.
@moparnut62864 ай бұрын
Hey the push rod v6 Vulcan was a good engine mine has 275k and still going...the overhead cam version was junk!
@mattnull70904 ай бұрын
I had a Vulcan 3.0 liter 24 valve V6 it was a running son of a gun
@gravytrain4163 ай бұрын
As someone else mentioned, the 5.7 Olds/Cadillac diesel conversions should certainly have made that list.
@blankczechz4 ай бұрын
I never heard of Saturn problems. I had two with 250k. I knew other people who had ovet 350k
@Fonpol683 ай бұрын
My dad swore by Saturn's. Never a major problem. My dad is legally blind 😂 his wife would drive him. We called him Miss Daisy
@myclearview653 ай бұрын
years ago I bought a Saturn with 250K for $900 and when it reached 350K I sold it for $900
@jlalbee3 ай бұрын
You mean a Shiturn?
@shabadoo244 ай бұрын
Shown the 70s Skylark instead of the front drive 80s Skylark
@RedneckSpaceman4 ай бұрын
12:30 - I had a 1988 Chevy Celebrity Wagon with this engine. In Chevys, it was called the "4-Tech". 2.5L inline 4. Old Pushrod and Rocker-Arm valve train. It did have EFI and fully Electronic Ignition. Surprisingly, I had no significant problems with mine. Sure, it didn't have much power but like I mentioned, it was very reliable!
@johnfrancis70034 ай бұрын
The 255 CI 4.2 V8 was used in the early 1980s. The truck used for this video had the 4.2 6 cylinder.
@chrish57913 ай бұрын
When I used to go to buy a used vehicle whose reliability I wasn’t that familiar with I’d call a good friend who managed a salvage yard and ask him about demand for the vehicle’s drivetrain components. If he had a lot of the vehicle’s parts in inventory I figured they were pretty reliable. If he couldn’t keep them in stock I’d avoid them like the plague.
@pal66363 ай бұрын
The classic " Vegamatic" caused a boom in people becoming mechanics . :) The Vega is the undisputed #1 in my era 👍 Had 2 friends decide a 350 would work much better in that car
@ronoconnor89714 ай бұрын
I had a Mazda RX2 wankel rotary. It was very fast until it blew the rotor seal at 30k miles
@timbutler64474 ай бұрын
20 - GM 2.4L Quad 4 19 - Chevy 2.2 OHV 18 - Cadillac V8-6-4 17 - Chrysler 2.7 V6 16 - Mitsubishi 3.0 V6 15 - Ford 4.2 V8 14 - Triumph Stag V8 13 - Yugo 1.1 12 - Mazda 1.3L Rotary 11 - GM 3.1 V6 10 - Subaru 2.5 Turbo 9 - WV 2.0L TSI 8 - Pontiac 2.5 Iron Duke 7 - Chrysler 2.0 SOHC 6 - Ford 3.8 V6 5 - Suzuki 1.0 3 cyl 4- Toyota 3.0 V6 3 - Land Rover K - Series 2 - Chevy 305 V8 1 - Saturn - 1.9 SOHC
@kenmason82034 ай бұрын
Thank you for the list, easier then the video
@datanation174 ай бұрын
Thanks for the table. Mine isn't on the list. Awesome.
@MrGlassman113 ай бұрын
6.0 and 6.4 Ford diesel engines top the list!!!
@zacly743 ай бұрын
Moral of the story, underpower = head gasket failure and never comingle coolant and oil.
@ashleighelizabeth59164 ай бұрын
Much as I loved my Acura Legend I'm somewhat surprised that the 3.2 V6 32A engine didn't make the list given how notorious they were for head gasket failures. I replaced one engine for the problem but when the second one started to go I finally dumped it for something less expensive to repair.
@davidledford35224 ай бұрын
If you can keep a quad 4 from overheating they last a good while i put 250000 on one
@perustc91584 ай бұрын
Yep, I had 2 Achieva's that both had well over 200,000 miles that I used for deliveries. I had to do the Cam chain tensioner modification on one but that's it!
@tacoheadmakenzie93114 ай бұрын
I had a '97 Skylark with a Quad 4 in it. I ran it up to 260,000 miles before I had to give up on the car due to too many NY winters
@ashleighelizabeth59164 ай бұрын
Still underpowered and rough as hell though.
@bmacster19852 ай бұрын
@@ashleighelizabeth5916Not for the time they were actually near the top for power especially the tq
@builttobeat27414 ай бұрын
None of this video is accurate
@matthewwebster26974 ай бұрын
I wouldn't say "none of it", but I would definitely say most of it.
@aussietaipan87004 ай бұрын
The Ford eco boot with the wet cam belt should have made this list, they are complete junk.
@northdakotaham17524 ай бұрын
I will never buy an Ecoboom.....and I buy alot of Fords.
@MrMustangMan20053 ай бұрын
@@northdakotaham1752 same....
@wilmerquesada83234 ай бұрын
ford 4.2 was a V6
@davidzdziarek-zl8cu4 ай бұрын
I owned a '94 Mustang 3.8 liter V6. An otherwise lovely car with an engine that transformed that road horse into a swayback, or to put it into the vernacular, a Mustink.
@claiborneeastjr4129Ай бұрын
My vote is for the Olds 350 diesel that was converted from gas. A real turd. Ours froze up completely.
@davidkarr2144 ай бұрын
Missed the Toyota 20R 4 cylinder engine head gasket and warped head problems.
@ryans4133 ай бұрын
The 2.4 Quad 4 was replace by the 2.2 Twin Cam and the 3.4 V6 was also an option on those Pontiacs.
@christianemmanuelf.domingo7933 ай бұрын
Some of those over heating make me think i dont need the max AC, the engine bay needs the max AC perhaps i need to make a vent for ac to the engine bay lol
@vintageradio34044 ай бұрын
The camera work is a shocker in this video. It'd be great if the cameraman did his job and held it still so we could see the engines.
@JamesMitchellLeith4 ай бұрын
You forgot the FORD!! 1.4-1.6-1.8Ltr CVH engines dohc 4 pot head gaskites leaks MK3+4 Escourts Seira.
@davelowets4 ай бұрын
10:06 If you put the problem solver intake gaskets in it ONCE, it was a VERY reliable and smooth running engine.
@S85B50Engine4 ай бұрын
Where's the Northstar (notorious for going supernova) or the S85 (with it's tendency to eject it's connecting rods after the rod bearings failed)?
@johnfrancis70034 ай бұрын
I'm surprised to see the Chevy 3100 V6. My parents had a baretta with that engine and drove it over 200,000 without any engine work needed.
@1voiceofstl4 ай бұрын
the caddy 8,6,4 just unplug 1 wire and it was a standard V8 that was GOOD.
@CindyDaugherty-v7h4 ай бұрын
I always say replace junk engines with sb chevys
@zacly743 ай бұрын
The 2.2 was preceded by the worse 2 0
@nathanhose18324 ай бұрын
I have 2009 dodge charger with a 2.7 that has 208000 miles on it, however I did change the oil every 3000.
@This.Handle.Is.Taken.Already3 ай бұрын
I've got a 2008 chrysler 300 with 271,000 miles on it. Drive it every day. I've replaced 2 fuel injectors, the radiator and the key switch. Owned it since 2009.
@jimjohnson88372 ай бұрын
You shouldn't forget on the Chevy 2.4L 4 cylinder, the placement of the alternator, caused overheating and failure of the alternator. We replaced 4 on a Corsia with less than 165,000 miles on it.
@buckdesystem45624 ай бұрын
3/4 of the way through and this trainwreck of a video never fails to screw up at even greater rates.
@vanhasydan47544 ай бұрын
With the subaru 2.5T, the ringland failure is, in part or in whole, is because the rings are located too high up the piston making them vulnerable.
@chriskappert13654 ай бұрын
Rover K series 1.8 fourcylinder . It was a headgasket eater .
@jeremywentworth18334 ай бұрын
It was also 1.4 , 1.6 & 1.8 . I was a Rover foundry metrology technician Quality engineer from 91 to 05.
@gloriaknight63044 ай бұрын
So it was your fault. haha.@@jeremywentworth1833
@kevinsavard59983 ай бұрын
I used to have a joke Yugo "You only go so far and that's it!"
@Mike-rx4in4 ай бұрын
I don't think a stock Chevy 305, had a flat tappet cam either? Only hydraulic cams in stock trim?
@tacoheadmakenzie93114 ай бұрын
I think that they mean as opposed to a roller camshaft.
@JR-ut1yx3 ай бұрын
😅
@yancyhenderson514Ай бұрын
But honestly seemed to me that they would last just as long as 350. Other then few hp differences in stock form. Heads, cam,intake, run with any other
@grannydeen15863 ай бұрын
I'm amazed the 2.6 Mitsubishi didn't make the list.
@wknight55954 ай бұрын
Surprised the old Pinto 4cyl isn't on here. I had one in the 80's and it literally burned a quart of oil every 50 miles before the engine had complete failure at 40k. It was hilarious looking in the mirror after waiting for a stop-light and seeing a huge smoke trail 😁 Sometimes people behind us would turn on their wipers in full sunshine 😆😂 We were in HS so we didn't care😁 I never met anyone who got more than 50k out of those engines.
@bunzeebear29734 ай бұрын
Vega was the competition to see who could smoke more. I remember . We would stop for oil and check the gas era.
@jeffhammers56774 ай бұрын
Quad fours were very popular with speed record cars of every description at the Salt flats
@JeanPouliot-hk6rc4 ай бұрын
Neon head gaskets blowing
@garykamler9044 ай бұрын
I expected to see the Ford Triton engines. Prone to blow spark plugs out.
@cgschow19714 ай бұрын
The spark plug blowout was due to the low plug torque spec from Ford (14ftlbs). Take it up to 22-25ftlbs, use only Motorcraft plugs, no antiseize, and you will never have a problem. 03 5 4l 2v with 310k. Still running strong.
@wolfguardian83124 ай бұрын
Triton engines were junk from the factory
@mattnull70904 ай бұрын
Mine has 192,000 miles on it.
@onewhoknowsrevenge68073 ай бұрын
Good call Gary.Being a mechanic for over 50 years,i can't count how many of those shitcans i repaired.
@paulcoutu4879Ай бұрын
got one 300,000 still running like new. MAINTENANCE
@detmer874 ай бұрын
PSA/Stellantis group 1.2 Puretech and 1.6 THP engines also need to be on this list. Ford first generation 1.0 Ecoboost also needs to be on this list.
@josephgalatha214 ай бұрын
I have to testify that I drove a 2000 Grand Am to a total of 217,000 miles on the original engine, never burned any oil. The body of the car fell apart around it, but the engine was indefatigable.
@davelowets4 ай бұрын
The Subaru turbo flat 4 LOVED to chuck rod bearings.
@Ripsaw172 ай бұрын
The 2.5 L GM was Notorious for egg shaping the cylinders
@davemilligan11713 ай бұрын
Notice how they keep saying.. " high engine repair costs " this made dealerships millions ... of course they will keep it in production.
@steve201183 ай бұрын
Loved my Quad4! Key was to catch head gasket right away(about 100K).
@matttrophy14 ай бұрын
How could you miss the Cadillac HT 4100
@tomnickel73003 ай бұрын
Sadly the new cars will self destruct just after the warranty tuns out .
@TheSpritz02 ай бұрын
Nissan 2.5L found in the Altima is excellent…
@crossbow12033 ай бұрын
Chevy 305 had horrible cams. The lobes would just melt away!
@Ripsaw172 ай бұрын
Anything that ever said Mitsubishi on it you knew it was junk right away
@chuckselvage31574 ай бұрын
"Chrysler continued to use the 2.7 V6 until 2010." Lol
@michaelalan1270Ай бұрын
Detroit has been building junk for decades. It's no wonder Japan took over as the most reliable cars, trucks. You never hear stories like this about Hondas or Toyotas.
@benmelich82204 ай бұрын
You forgot the Ford 6.0 liter diesel engine!
@Chevyman024 ай бұрын
The 6.4L diesel from Ford was one of the worst as well.
@marena41364 ай бұрын
Both engines are international truck.
@bradzimmerman31714 ай бұрын
@@marena4136umm you mean Navistar and gM are made by Isuzu (so fancy name added-Duramax or Dirtymax as it has become better known
@marcusmarrs3 ай бұрын
No Vega engine, no Olds 5.7L diesel, first gen Ford Escort? These engines were a LOT worse than the 305 Chev, the 3.1L Chev, or the 3.8L Ford
@DMPB-fi2ir3 ай бұрын
the 8-6-4 was the worst idea because it didnt have the technology of today but i would have tossed the northstart engine on here instead
@Jumpjoe45873 ай бұрын
i like the iron duke on old concept but relable
@trashpanda96333 ай бұрын
I mine has 154k with the 5 speed.
@zacly743 ай бұрын
The 3 liter Mitsubishi was preceded by the worse 2.6
@Chiefie233 ай бұрын
You forgot to mention the 2.3l Ford ranger engine for its lackluster performance and head gasket failure
@daverd1002 ай бұрын
The Cadillac v 8 6 4 was a good engine But the technology wasn’t up to the task 368 cubic inches .one the system was deactivated The engine was very reliable and lasted !
@peteleadlove92154 ай бұрын
GM 454 SOME OF THE ENGINES WERE LEMMONS OVER HEATING
@davidnewland25564 ай бұрын
the fourcylinder in my dodge caravan had a history of head gasket failures
@sst5684 ай бұрын
Probably 2.2 or 2.5, other than head gaskets they were fairly dependable.
@davidnewland25564 ай бұрын
@@sst568 the dealer told me it was the head gasket that caused my problems.
@stevenwood65924 ай бұрын
probably 2.6 mitsubishi junk they put in early caravans
@timb34993 ай бұрын
I just watched a different video stating that the 3.0 Toyota was one of the best. I had a 92 4Runner that blew a head gasket at 50k and the fuel injection failed shortly after that repair. The 3.4 was a big improvement.
@think20233 ай бұрын
Power or endurance?? OK...tell me how power is related to reliability.
@neilmarsh19043 ай бұрын
Did ANYBODY build a good engine?
@goldfieldgary3 ай бұрын
International Harvester IMHO.
@Adov69Finger3 ай бұрын
Volvo 😊😊
@paulcoutu4879Ай бұрын
yes ford 289 302 chev 327 with 202's
@garyshoaf5699Ай бұрын
301 cu in Pontiac engine should be on the list.
@neilhoogendoorn80454 ай бұрын
Dont these companies test the new engine designs?
@sst5684 ай бұрын
No, we do Lol
@bretfisher72864 ай бұрын
Any potential for corporate politics and corruption will be found abundantly in almost any automobile manufacturer. The culture is among the worst in any industry. At the top of any automobile manufacturer is the sociopath manager, the smooth corporate operator who won't hesitate to pass horrible liabilities on to the consumer.
@christianemmanuelf.domingo7933 ай бұрын
Welp now that u detect the problem, make, sell improved after market parts to make said unreliable inventions reliable again
@ShanLiB4 ай бұрын
Worst in my personal experience was the Ford 2004 6.0 liter diesel turbo in my F350 crew cab long bed.
@MrMustangMan20053 ай бұрын
GM = got money.????
@letsgobrandon6944 ай бұрын
Ummm the 4.2 was a v6
@paulcoutu4879Ай бұрын
defective intake gaskets would hydraulic eng and bend rod
@GregMargraff4 ай бұрын
The Chevy 2.8 V6 was a real piece od junk too!
@jeffmills58274 ай бұрын
I expected to see the ford triton motors for spark plugs blowing out
@paulcoutu4879Ай бұрын
mechanics error 4.6 one of the most bullet proof engines ever built
@JC-gw3yo4 ай бұрын
Thank God I missed those clunkers... Goober Motors definately tops the list
@eddiestanley1353 ай бұрын
Oh excellent, so Chrysler had this ingenious water pump design; Ford saw it, and decided to add it to the lineup!!??
@drremulack61963 ай бұрын
6:11 This was a 4.2 L V6. The 4.2 V8 was stopped in 1983.
@DTBaker-gq4fd4 ай бұрын
Mustangs with a V-6 still can’t stay off the sidewalks.
@KyleDavis-x6k4 ай бұрын
I don't remember a 305 with super charger on it it still wouldn't help
@jamesorth15213 ай бұрын
Aftermarket supercharger adds approx. 100hp.
@Toby-f7h3 ай бұрын
1975 Honda CVCC. 1976-1979 Honda 4c blowing head gaskets.
@cybertug43 ай бұрын
Where is the Chevy 5.3? About to have to replace my second one with less than 85,000 miles. Absolute trash