2013 Impala LTZ 3.6L VVT 0-100mph

[@SaladDev]

My drug dealer used to have an Impala SS with a $2 on the dash Then he crashed it And went to jail

[@Cruella_The_Devlle]

is the $2 bill for to hide the check engine light lol

[@Moneyman_joepo]

Nah for traction lights

[@Cruella_The_Devlle]

That's the cheapest traction delete

[@miguelperedo9825]

Traction is on other side

[@MR.BIG.d]

Well obviously it’s an Impala

[@silverrain99205]

@@Moneyman_joepo nah that’s definitely for check engine light lol

[@Sam-hk2uq]

That transmission really holds it back

[@Moneyman_joepo]

I swear. I hate how when it spins too much it up shifts then downshifts back to first. If it would just spin through the gears it’ll be way better

[@4everdizzysworld916]

@@Moneyman_joepo ZZP sells a TCM tune that fixes that and also helps the shifts a little. I have a custom PCM tune also got my 1/4 down to a 13.7 with no spray. But this is also a 3800 not 3600

[@samsquantch14]

@@4everdizzysworld916 wtf are you talking about the 3800...im confused lol

[@keelandarger4866]

@@samsquantch14he means the engine, his car is a 3.8L v6 that makes 200hp stock, this is 3.6L v6 that makes 300hp stock

[@keelandarger4866]

@@4everdizzysworld916would the tune work for the 3.6?

[@SpeedyB2K]

Love GM 3.6l, got an LY7 in my 09’ Malibu

[@automotiveanarchy6131]

I fw yo vids G just subscribed

[@EndritBajramiEshte21]

sounds like a J series honda . this is strange but very cool

[@skylarscales9922]

I’d say this 0-60 was about as fast as a LS4 Impala.

[@krayzietj]

Didnt floor it

[@basslover352]

That is flooring it. hello?

[@justinmartin8887]

Almost as fast as a stock camry

[@ashes2ashes863]

Faster than a 2013 Camry, and quite a bit heavier and physically larger too.

[@justinmartin8887]

@@ashes2ashes863 not a v6 Camry unfortunately

[@ashes2ashes863]

@@justinmartin8887 according to Motor Trend, a 2014 3.6 L Impala hit 60 and 6.2 seconds. The V6 Camry in 2014 was 6.8. Having driven them both, that's about what I expected despite the Impala being bigger. It just pulls a lot harder than the Camry did. It also has a significant horsepower advantage despite the motors being almost identical in size. I would be willing to bet they're that the Camry would start to catch it at the quarter-mile just because of the weight advantage. Impalas were no joke. They held their own. Even the four cylinder Impala wasn't all that bad. The 2.5 L was a 200 horsepower motor naturally aspirated. That might not been that impressive but it had almost the same amount of torque. Not bad for a 4 cylinder.

[@justinmartin8887]

@@ashes2ashes863 I can do sub 6 seconds all day with my 2010 Camry. And there’s lots of videos to prove it. Some of the next generation where a bit slower. Also according to edmunds the v6 camry weighs 3516 lbs and the v6 lt Impala weighs 3555 lbs. so they’re nearly identical in size

[@justinmartin8887]

@@ashes2ashes863 kzbin.info/www/bejne/j3itf56LqqyAprc