2014 Mustang GT (BUDGET BOLT ON PARTS) 428 RWHP at Brenspeed 18 Manifold, JLT, Stainless Power

[@paulhudgins5120]

Job well done Brent, love the numbers from mods done, the 18 intake manifold, JLT intake, love the 3.73 gears, that will help it for the street.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Yes a very fun car to drive for sure.

[@SaloomAlrawi]

My car is a 2013 Mustang, automatic transmission, JLT add-ons, first edition filter and X-pipe // 381 hp // 386 TRQ

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Thanks for watching!

[@Chris-id1or]

This setup is by far the biggest bang for buck car you can build out there considering you can buy a used 13-14’ 5.0 for as cheap as 16k

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Thanks for watching!

[@fontanimal09]

Brent, I appreciate you making these videos and taking the time to respond to the comments. I can see you care about what you do. I want you to know because of this video I ordered the SP LT headers from you and will be installing here in a couple of weeks. Got the rest if this setup ready to install as well based on your setup here. So 13 GT, MT82, 18 ported mani, Airaid CAI, RST clutch/lightened flywheel, alum driveshaft. I already have Bama for life which I’ve had no issues with but after install I’ll be reaching out to you for a tune (with data logging?). Just need to take care of the rear end now! Thanks for posting these and taking care of your customers and non customers as well!

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Thanks for the great comment! Here is a link to our mail order tune. www.brenspeed.com/1tune-2011.html

[@jasonscott9653]

Sweet!! I have a 13gt thats making 453whp my set up is very similar i have a steeda cai 18 manifold american racing long tubes cat delete full ford racing stainless steel exhaust with the quad crome tips a light weight one piece drive shaft rear locker with 4.11 gears and the barton short shifter talk about a fun car to play with

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Sweet set up. Yes I bet that is a fun car.

[@Relentlesscatfishing]

killing me man, my car only put out 386 with the same setup this week. Mines a 2012 with a ported 18 manifold, steeda intake, Full exhuast no cats, DSS driveshaft.... im butthurt about it LOL.

[@jasonscott9653]

@@Relentlesscatfishing realy???? Man thats a big gap between us with pretty much the same set up. Do you live at a high elevation or something

[@Relentlesscatfishing]

@@jasonscott9653 nope I'm in missouri lol fixing to put it in e85 and see what it does. I'd be happy with 400 on my drag radials

[@whipplejosh]

@@Relentlesscatfishing sounds like a shitty dyno

[@u32123]

Oh yeah. 2021, time to get back at it.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Will do thanks for watching!

[@JD704.]

Always doing an awesome job 💯. Man is putting out number on the Dyno...👍💯!!!

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Thanks for the comment and thank you for taking the time to watch.

[@DoubleDJ11]

I have a '14 gt with an 18 manifold making 417whp 375tq, hoping to hit 430 with headers soon

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Sweet!

[@saad_ahmed2187]

I have a 2014 gt automatic Mods are: American racing 1-7/8ths long tubes with Catless x pipe Lu47 injectors E85 tune Boss 302 intake manifold Airraid cold air intake Ford performance aluminum driveshaft And upgraded my rear end gears to 3.73 it came stock with 3.15 I just had my car put on the dyno to see how much it makes made 3 passes 411whp, 414whp, 419whp, and torque was around the 370 range. I feel like this is low for the mods done to the car what do you think?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Auto cars always read low. Plus many factors play a role in the "numbers". The cars are smart and the fact you are running E85 the knock sensors will load in timing on there own. I would not sweat it I bet the car feels pretty fast.

[@gordydexter2615]

Nice video Brent!!! What is your thoughts on American Racing headers or Kooks headers instead? Obviously they cost a bit more over stainless racing but is it worth to step up to AmRc or Kooks? Should we always go with 1 7/8 verses 1 3/4?

[@scottcausey1751]

I have a 2011 GT with almost the same exact setup except I'm running the Boss 302 manifold, JLT2, Stainless power w/ high flow cats, FRPP driveshaft and 3.73s and a 93 octane tune. Do you think my numbers would be similar? Thank you so much for the videos, really enjoyed the high mile coyote mustang.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Prob close... they would be a bit lower at low rpm and a bit lower at high rpm with that manifold. But in the end they would somewhat close just not in all the different RPM ranges because of that manifolds design.

[@StormMartialArt]

Thanks, great video! How would you think the 2018 manifold would compare to a Cobra jet Manifold?

[@Justin_SVT]

VMP did a video a while back, and I believe compared to the ‘18 the CJ is just slightly better by a couple tq’s. A ported ‘18 is 1/2 the price of a CJ. A stock ‘18 is a 1/4 the price of a CJ.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

I have ran both on the same car and did not see any large difference in the 1/4 mile or dyno. The 18 is by far the better bang for the back. Plus... I think the Cobra Jet coyote manifold was discontinued.

[@hermanrogers1325]

I just got a 2014 mustang GT sterling gray with a 6 speed transmission to complement my 2004 mustang GT automatic dark shadow gray both have staggered Crome billet wheels and I want more power I will add some of theses parts soon

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Thanks for the comment!

[@victorxavier9977]

Thx Brent I enjoy all the videos wondering what this car would make with a Cobra Jet instead of the 18 intake?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

They are super super close. I have made more with the CJ but running no cats on a race set up. For the money this is not a bad combo at all and what you save you can get cool things like a driveshaft or other mods like a rear end build.

[@midnight347]

The 18 is a good budget intake for sure...but the cj is just better and the gaps widens the more radical your setup is (like if you have cams and full catless exhaust with headers and e85 there will be a larger gap between them than a mild setup but the cj will make more on any setup) just don't smother the cj with a stock gt500 thody or something go monoblade if you wanna unlock the true potential of the cj. There was a guy online who went from a setup just like this video was making about the same power...went from 430ish whp to 480ish switching from the 18 manifold to a cj and adding l&m intake only cams and didn't lose any torque from the cj or intake only cams that is an ideal setup imo. It obviously costs more but will get better results. 18 is great for a budget setup but the cj will make more and the gap widens as the mods get more max effort that is the basic cliff notes to take away.

[@midnight347]

Also to add to what I said I would recommend at least l&m intake cams in addition to the cj if you wanna get full potential from the cj the gen 1 cams hold the cj back from its potential more than gen 2 and 3 cams which are a little better. That is why on gen 1 cars ppl think the 18 is about as good as the cj because the cj doesn't really pull away by a good margin from the 18 on gen 1 cars till the intake cams are swapped out to let the cj shine. Stock gen 1 cams hold the cj back and let the 18 come within striking distance of the cj but the cj is still gonna be better but not nearly as much better as it could be if that makes sense.

[@victorxavier9977]

@@midnight347 thank you for the feedback! I'm planning on the L&M & CJ intake done at the same time and agree the GT needs cams but not willing to spend money on stage 3 cams for just a little more power I just want a nice NA car that I can drive and not worry. Thx!

[@gtfreak32]

I wish you were in Florida

[@brianespo22]

I’ve been debating on putting a gen 2 short block in my 2013 get

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

That would be sweet!

[@Christopher_R]

I know you guys are in Indiana, but is there a snowball’s chance in hell you can make power and still pass Ohio e-check (on a 2014 GT with these parts)?

[@shanvhere78]

I only got 402 RWHP with that setup on my 12

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

You might like this video its pretty informative kzbin.info/www/bejne/f5zPo42bZ5WSd9E

[@AreteAutoworks]

Is the 18’ intake manifold ported, what all required to run the 18+ intake?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Not ported. Nothing required except locking the IMRC open because the 11-14 does not have IMRC.

[@JG-wb6eg]

I have a 1988 notchback with listed mods - 2013 gen1 GT motor, (stock), ford power pack swap harness, bbk long tube headers + xpipe, JLT cold air intake (2011-2014 model), quantum fuel system complete fuel set up (750HP range), 2004 t56 trans + driveshaft (stock not modified), Mccloud dual disc clutch, spec aluminum flywheel, 4:10 gears, MGW short throw shifter, maximum motorsports k-member + lower arms, 96 cobra brakes all around, 94 front spindles, Dakota digital cluster, N gauge custom tune (93 octane, and ghost cam tunes), haven't been on dyno yet what do you think it will make and what would you do next ?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

I would typically say check with your tuner as who knows how much timing or fueling they are running. But prob 410-440 dynojet sae would be my guess. Aluminum flywheel will help your numbers as well. 18 mani would be a good addition.

[@high-rise8505]

Will the Paxton 2200 supercharger kit work with this setup or should I keep the stock manifold or go boss on my 2014 5.0. I'm definitely getting the paxton though. Thanks. Great video like always. 🇺🇸

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Yes you can use the Paxton kit with this set up no problem. You can also use of course with stock manifold or the boss intake. I would not really suggest boss if you do not have a manifold yet use the 18 manifold it is better power and torque. Thanks for watching!

[@high-rise8505]

@@BrenspeedEngineering awesome! Thank you! 🇺🇸

[@MustangGuy1996]

Was the 18 intake manifold used on this car the ported or non ported version?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Non ported.

[@rgr4475]

In my research, I'm reading low end torque loss with the boss 302 intake. What is the dyno saying?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

I dont have current graphs but years ago I tested that. Yes, big low end loss. I also ran it on my car and no doubt you can feel the loss especially in auto. You can google some magazine tests of manifolds and see they get the same loss results.

[@Cruiser-nr3pl]

My guess is the intake is where most of the gain is?

[@ernestoalatorre7766]

Was planning on doing a full bolt on to my 14gt but my real goal and final is for it to be supercharged I think I’m just going to skip this step. I Really wanted to experience it tho but waste of money seems like it ?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Well if you are getting something like a Roush SC skip the intake manifold. If you are getting something like a Paxton you can use the manifold. None of the supercharger kits will retain the JLT intake. All can use the headers.

[@tylersarver7512]

Do you have to have the aluminum drive shaft when aiming to make 500 hp. Just wondering if it is a necessity during a 5.0 build

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

If you are running sticky tires I suggest getting a 1 piece shaft at some point.

[@KungFuCooter]

The car needs the Ford Boss Laguna Seca rims and it would look Awesome.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Thanks for the comment!

[@MannyMadeIt]

If i wanted to supercharge in the future would that be possible with this setup ??

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Yes it would no problem.

[@glennreis97]

What kind of 1/4 mile times from this set up. I know this is old, but this is similar to what I was planning.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Im not quoting drag racing times so many variables. 1 person with suspension and tires along with a dead hook go's 11's and one rooky with stock tires spinning goes 13's. To hard to tell.

[@paradoxmind15]

Ok. So i have a question regarding the tuning device. So i have a 2014 gt that currently has the lund racing nguage tuner in it. I have the intake package coming in friday (so says usps tracking) once i have this installed, can i use the nguage, or is a sct tuner a must? Would like to keep money in my pocket.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

If you are using the Lund tune they would retune with Ngauge software I think. If you are getting our tune we only use SCT. THANKS

[@StBeter-tc2te]

is that Mustang on 18 or 19 in Wheels? Have the same wheels but it’s 19 on 245/45/r19 and it has a huge gap on the back between the wheel and fender

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Sorry not sure on those wheels that is an old video my memory does not go back that far on wheels lol.

[@MotoTaco]

Debating these or JBA headers with an o/r x pipe (SC doesn't do inspections). Do you have any experience with JBA?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Sorry we do not sell JBA or use them. I have not really heard anything bad about them though. Thanks for watching!

[@dakotajones8010]

Have JBA on my 14 5.0 they are great 👌

[@MotoTaco]

@@dakotajones8010 I ended up going with them (found a company that had a o/r x pipe so i snagged that) but they should be here mid may and instal early june hopefully.

[@mattjohnson9926]

Would there be an advantage to doing E85 with this combination?

[@midnight347]

There is always an advantage to going e85 even na. You will see 10-20 whp bump peak to peak even on a bolt on setup and what makes it so good is most of that power bump is across the entire powerband rather than just at the top like some other mods...it makes it much better down low and on the hit because you can ramp up initial timing because of the added knock prevention. It will make the car have worse mpg but it is also much cheaper than 93 so it all kinda evens out in the end.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

My opinion it has its pros and cons. Pros yes a bit more timing vs 93 which equals a little more power and torque NA as well is it burns pretty cool. Cons is that is uses a lot more fuel to do the same thing. This means larger injectors and likely a fuel pump or boost a pump. E85 does not like cold weather either. So it really depends what you do with your car and if that bit more power and torque is worth dealing with the cons.

[@daltonambrose4268]

Hey just a question I have a 2012 mustang gt and looking to get a ported 18 intake manifold should I get the intake pigtails which allows you to retain the IRMC or no and also would you recommend to go to e85

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Your 12 does not have IMRC so you do not retain them. You lock them open. Yes you can do E85 if you do not have good quality 93 octane. You will need a boost a pump and LU47 injectors (FRPP 47LB). Thanks.

[@brianpoulson7642]

Brent, I have 2012 Boss 302 that I use for road racing. Would the 18 manifold be a upgrade to its current Boss 302 intake? I know the CJ is, but all those parts for that are 1800 -2k. I use 100 octane race gas and rev to 7700-7800.

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Honestly if it were me and I had a boss which already has the boss intake I would put money somewhere else. If I did not have a boss intake then yes go with the 18 over the boss intake. If you already have every other mod to the car and are looking for something else then yes swap intakes.

[@midnight347]

I wouldn't bother swapping unless it is to a ported cobra jet setup anything else isn't worth the swap on a boss 302 imo. Having your stock intake ported would be a good budget upgrade. You really wanna make it haul ass go with a ported cj and l&m intake cams you'd probably see a 50 whp gain and no loss in torque you might even gain torque over the boss setup.

[@thr65]

After getting all that where to buy a tune for it……I have a sct tuner….can i get a custom tune for it

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Here is a link to purchase a tune if you have an SCT www.brenspeed.com/1tune-2011.html

[@thr65]

@@BrenspeedEngineering And you ship to Canada

[@chriscarbajalj]

Quick question I dynoed at 433whp and I have a 2011 5.0 with ported cobra jet manifold, american racing longtube headers with catted xpipe, borla atak catback, twin vmp 67mm tb, and pmas cai. Does that sound right or should I had make more?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

That sounds good. With variables, trans, different dyno's, days, weight of rear wheels, fuel, knock activity, correction factors, etc... yes you should be happy with that.

[@chriscarbajalj]

@@BrenspeedEngineering thanks, I have 3.73s and I believe it was done on a dyno jet

[@SquilloS]

Thinking about getting the 18+ intake manifold for my 2011, I already have a roush intake, will I have to get a new intake if I get the 18 manifold or should everything still line up?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

You can get your current cold air intake to line up when installing an 18 manifold.

[@ahdization]

My car 2012 full exhaust, LT jba ,93 octane and jlt series 1 with hp tune its make 454 hp on dayno mustang .. and my time with boss or 2018 they make around 465 ,462

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Thanks for watching!

[@cyclonekevin6199]

Does hi flow cats, make a difference?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

High flow cats do help vs stock cats. I can't say an exact power number because cars are different but yes they do help.

[@cyclonekevin6199]

@ Thank you

[@2.65tvs2]

Another great video!!

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Glad you like them!

[@toddf9321]

It's been 3 years since my last trip to Brenspeed, Brent. Time to upgrade my 2014. Are you having any issues with the EPA? My only restriction is getting 93 octane...we have 91 where I live and that is the highest.

[@sfcjerryharris1]

What all that cost you? Will it be better to go with a Paxton 2200 boosted? Cost will be the issue

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Parts links are in the video description. You can click on it and see prices.

[@chinomagana7533]

$2300

[@hxudini757]

I Have 2014 gt , same situation as dude (, jlt , 3.73, but a ported 18 mani / Lund 93 tune ) but with stock headers/cats . Thinking about getting lu47 and running e85 , any idea of the hp numbers I’d pick up? I’m hearing like an extra 30/40 whp is that realistic ? Thanks

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

The only way you are going to pick up 30-40 all motor with E85 is if your 91 or 93 tune was running literally shit total timing to start with. Say if you can run 4 more total degrees with E85 your not gaining 40 rwhp all motor.

[@SmokyLexicon]

E85 for these cars add 7-12hp

[@themarvelousvintage76]

What the stock gear come with 14 gt 3.55?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

3 options with the manual. 3.31, 3.55, or 3.73.

[@themarvelousvintage76]

@@BrenspeedEngineering so how can found out if mine come with 3.55 3.73 or 3.31?

[@legoboyfan123456789]

I have a 2011 GT/CS with a magnaflow competition series cat back exhaust and a CDC shaker hood scoop on it. I’ve been looking around trying to come up with a combination of mods (keeping it NA) that would make 500 at the wheels. Do you have any suggestions? Much appreciated boss

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

That is very very tough all motor on a Gen 1. You are pretty much talking a full race build in my opinion. 75 more rwhp than this video is hard to come by bolting on more parts even with ported heads, cams, and E85.

[@chriscooper8210]

Compression bump on gen 1. Or swap out the gen1 shortblock for a gen 3 (12:1 compression).

[@casper82ify]

I may have missed this but you guys did do a tune also right?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Yes 93 octane tune we put on the SCT X4.

[@Sonicaceman]

Good numbers but wouldn’t you have a lot more usable low end street torque with short headers and the stock manifold? Peak hp is coming from the 18 manifold which you have to ring the crap out of to get. I had 402/393 on an 2011 GT/cs with tune intake and catback with stock headers and manifold. I feel like the extra money for the long tubes and that 18 intake are not worth the 25 hp gain and a 10 torque loss which will not amount to much I real word driving that you would notice Guess it depends on what you’re looking for just my opinion Definitely no slouch and a good street setup for sure though

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

You hit the nail on the head with "Guess it depends on what your looking for". Many people look for mid to high over low, and then others look for low not high. THANKS for watching!

[@luisrodrigues5179]

What oil should u run on those cars 5w20 or 5w30 .... thanks

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

You can do the factory suggested 5w20 but we run 5w50 on most high rpm or supercharged cars.

[@dk5oh]

Is this 18 manifold ported? And also is it the stock throttle body??

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Stock throttle body, un ported. Thanks.

[@adrianalvarez8059]

Boss 302 intake good as well ? 🤨

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

The thing I don't like about the boss intake is the low end loss vs stock. It does well at high RPM. The 18 manifold really does not have a loss about anywhere for the most part.

[@Forbidden_Tomes]

What a lot of people don’t tell you about the boss manifold though is the high end gains are phenomenal. If you roll race, it’s a great mod. Pair it with headers to get some of the lost power back and you’re good to go.

[@Whatisgoingon-od9yb]

How many miles were on that car

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Sorry not sure on the miles on that.

[@polloo214]

Why not go roush intake

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

on 11-14 the Roush cold air is the same size as the factory air box maf housing. We typically use JLT because it is larger.

[@NissanTy]

This car has pretty much all the mods mine has except the 18 intake and mine has offroad X with my long tubes. So i'm assuming mine makes around 420 wheel. Awesome!

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Yes prob right around that thanks for watching!

[@McBobtheruggaman]

yours makes 115 wheel HP, sorry

[@steibz3262]

How come my boosted 11 with your tune only made 100 more whp?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Depends on the package you have, auto trans vs manual, fuel, conditions, really no details to compare. Im sure your torque is way higher having boost.

[@matttorres2262]

is the manifold ported?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

I do not believe that one was.

[@KingRemnant]

Are the headers 1 3/4 or 1 7/8?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

1 7/8

[@ericswires8534]

Glad to see another great video. So if a stock 2014 is rated at 420 hp then why is this dyno showing 428 hp after all the mods ? Sorry, I know I’m probably missing something so it’s a learning experience for me. Thanks!!

[@MyNameStanc0l]

That’s horsepower you’re talking about it is very different than wheel horsepower. At the wheel idk the 2014 probably make 350 so 428 at the wheel is pretty impressive! Hope that makes sense :)

[@Did_he_meek]

420 hp is measured from ford from the flywheel. And as the power is sent through the drive train it is called parasitic loss which is usually 12-15% less than flywheel horsepower. So that lesser value is what is actually getting to the road and being true useable horsepower. Hope this answers your question

[@ericswires8534]

@@MyNameStanc0l Great , thanks ! 👍🏻

[@ericswires8534]

@@Did_he_meek Thanks for the info! 👍🏻

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Yep what they said..... Chassis dyno is rear wheel horsepower not flywheel which is the number you are talking about (420).

[@s197rome9]

Wow, thank you for explaining. How about for my set up? Ported 2018 with 2018 Pmas Lu47, bbk shorty, catless x

[@jaycamacho8179]

Get on a dyno? Lol

[@jesusvillagomez1886]

I have a 2012 mustang boss 302 My mods are Pmas intake Mbrp header no cat Hpipe Full exhaust 93 octane Tune by Lund But I never dyno it to see how much power I’m pushing . How much power do you think I would have ?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

You would need to direct that question to Lund as they make the tune and control the fueling and timing for that set up.

[@jeffortman6395]

I need a tune

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

www.brenspeed.com/2011-mustang-programmers.html

[@DJ-kk3co]

Would you recommend an e85 tune ?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Depends on your available fuel and if you don't mind the issues E85 can cause. If you cant get good quality 93 you may like E85. Our Indiana 93 is awesome so E85 offers little gains all motor if you are used to tuning good 93. Now if you have crappy fuel you may love E85. Just be aware it deteriorates some of the fuel system over time, cold start issues in cold weather sometimes, etc... and you need larger injectors and fuel pump upgrade most of the time. So for some its great, some not so much. Depends if you want to deal with the $$ and issues you may have vs 93 or 91.

[@joseolivares6729]

How much do boss manifold fbo cars usually make

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

That manifold is not a very good manifold. Maybe about the same as this video in full FBO mode or a little less. Low end loss would be greater with a boss. High RPM power would drop off sooner.

[@joseolivares6729]

@@BrenspeedEngineering what could I do to get more power or would it be worth upgrade to 18

[@ColemanProductionsCP]

How good are you guys? Like from a scale of 1-10? You guys do ghost cam, 93 performance and 93 octane? I have 2014 Mustang 3.7 I’ll make it FBO soon

[@yungactivist]

I wished I bought a gt but they were 22k then went up to 28k now 34k so I bought a v6 instead

[@Choc1222]

should have waited

[@cyraxkkcb2mo10]

Dont the 2014 gt come with 420hp and 390 from factory..how you only get 8 hp with all them modifications..🤷🏼

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

You are comparing flywheel HP to rear wheel HP. Not the same thing. A chassis dyno which you watched is rear wheel after all the drivetrain loss. A stock 14 manual might make 370 rwhp on a chassis dyno, not 420 as that is the flywheel rating.

[@coyoteaustin17]

My dog

[@ALHARBi-976-Q8]

thes car for sale?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Not sure it was a clients.

[@ALHARBi-976-Q8]

Can you give me his number please?

[@jimbrow83]

Why don't you show the curves like this on boosted 3v videos 🤷‍♂️

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

If I remember I will next time if I have a good before and after. I really just wing these video's 1 take done lol. THANKS

[@patrickv3413]

I got a 2011 mustang gt auto, should i go with the 3.73 or 4.10 gears? looking to get the most it can offer

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

All motor I enjoy 4.10 on an auto 3.73 on a manual. Very fun on the street.

[@osamaalshatti3534]

I recommend 3.55, i had 2011 gt with cobra jet kooks shorty headers jlt intake i was taking on 450rwhp c5 corvette with headers cams intake etc. 3.55 gives good mpg and awesome shift points.

[@patrickv3413]

@@osamaalshatti3534 you ever get it dynoed and also auto?

[@EastTheBeast911]

Where are you guys located?

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Indiana 46562

[@coyoteaustin17]

Bruh imagine if you’re on e85

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

That would be cool.

[@jimbrow83]

You made 420whp on a your employee 11 gt with 18 mani jlt and hi flow cats on your email tune. This is disappointing headers gave nothing? 13/14 have 8 more whp to begin with lol

[@andrewpeterson3065]

do you think the stock 4.6 with 160k miles on it and the T3650 could handle the torque and hp from this?? I was looking at putting either Ford Performance Hot Rod cams in it or some Comp Cams too

[@BrenspeedEngineering]

Hi here is a video about top 5 questions when adding a supercharger to a 3V. So not sure if you mean boosted or just bolt on parts. Bolt on parts typically not an issue with 160k. You might like watching this. It goes into detail on miles and high HP. kzbin.info/www/bejne/qpnYY3Skacuieas