2015 Chevrolet Suburban & Tahoe Review

[@justonp1981]

Test drove it. We are getting the Lincoln Navigator after driving the Yukons and Tahoes. Visually I thought the Yukon and Tahoe was nice inside and out. Rear seat is not good for bigger kids or adults in the Yukon or Tahoe where the Navigator definitely does. The floor height is cramped with the solid rear axle underneath in the Yukon and Tahoe, where in the Navigator your feet are not cramped because the Navigator has rear independent suspension. The Yukon and Tahoe doesn't have independent rear suspension so when you drive you notice that the vehicle doesn't have as good of a ride as the Navigator. Steering the Yukon and Tahoe took way more work but I did like the thick steering wheel where the Navigator steered effortlessly. Gas pedal on the Small V8 is so restricted to try and get good gas mileage. The 6.2 was well powered and didn't have the same lethargic gas pedal but on the Lincoln Navigator the throttle response was not just amazing but powerful across a larger power-band. I don't think the 6.2 would win zero to 60 nor do I think the 6.2 could out pull a full trailer as well.

[@presidentkyrstensinema6374]

Well, the suburban and Tahoe also have much more room than the navigator. They have better reliabilty and crash ratings. And adding to that, tahoeade and suburbans are also faster, get better fuel economy, and manage to be faster than the navigator and expedition. Face it, ford sucks with quality and reliability

[@justonp1981]

Jordan Sloan​​​​​ The Suburban and Tahoe do not have more room than the Navigator/Expedition with all 3 rows in place. Compare cargo size. Standard wheelbase: The Ford product @ 19 cubic feet best the GM products @ 15 cubic feet. Here are the actual 0-60 numbers stock: Chevy Tahoe 5.3 V8 0-60mph @ 7.1sec. Ford Expedition 3.5 V6 @ 6.4sec. GMC Yukon 6.2 V8 @ 5.5sec Also the Ford is right between the 5.3 and 6.2 in fuel economy: 5.3 V8 is 16/22mpg 3.5 V6 is 15/20mpg 6.2 V8 is 14/21mpg The Ford stops faster 70-0mph than the GM products, it tows better because it has a long max torque curve that starts a 2,500rpm, it rides better with IRS and has more 3rd row leg room. Your post is lop sided and brand loyal. Read the reviews. Not the exaggerations of Chevy sales men. The Ford for 2015 got the Car and Driver Editors Choice among 5 full size SUV's. Tahoe 5.3 2nd, Suburban 3rd, GMC Yukon 6.2 4th, and Yukon XL 5th.  

[@BBTthetank]

Juston Preble The Expedition numbers sound about right but i think the GM numbers are little too fast. The Tahoe gets to 60 in the low 8's maybe upper 7's on a good launch, while the Suburban hits 60 in the mid to upper 8's. Same with the Yukon Denali, it's about dead even with the Ecoboost Expedition. My F-150 ecoboost hits 60 at around 6 something so the Expedition's 0-60 times are right around what you put.

[@uoipiopiop]

it seems like the seats are 2+2+2, is it convertible? Because I really need one more seat on the second row.

[@jeffreywilson7430]

WHERE YOU GET THE FOG LIGHTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!????????????????????????????????????????????

[@RedSquirreLx]

canadain review? yes!

[@justinmaloney7108]

In NYC all the uber drivers have this... It kind of makes it a taxi car........which is kind of takes away the allure of the SUV...makes it seem like a service vehicle...almost like a van.

[@the-expertstreetb-racer5832]

We used to buy new suburban every 5 years since 1999 Because its really good But When 2015 came out The price is way too expensive. Now father thinking about Toyota Sequoia

[@johncole4528]

TOW , WORK , PLAY.

[@Yet1moreUtuber]

It's a OK review,..but no Test Drive?

[@aaroncrocker3081]

The LT's are sick!!

[@atshanmohammed8114]

حلوه