2016 Audi RS7 Performance takes on Shift Sector

[@RobGADV]

This car has been at the top of my Want list for several years now... and with the Performance model, even moreso. I need to pick up more lottery tickets tomorrow...

[@FISHGOMOO4321]

And that's why, last year, 7th of July 2019. I purchased one. Happiest days of my life since then.

[@neilmcmahon]

I picked one up in May this year. It makes me smile every time I think about it.

[@ryancooper73]

This video explains why this is my dream car. It does everything... Of course a front engine rear wheel drive naturally aspirated manual transmission car is more fun in the canyon roads but the RS7 can be defined in one word: versatile. Snow? No problem thanks to its quattro system. Long road trip? No problem thanks to the quiet engine, 4 cylinder mode, trunk space, and 4 seats. Wanna have fun? Audi drive select on Dynamic, step on the gas and voila

[@SvenTeresniak]

But there is one thing the RS7 likes the most: the German Autobahn. Pure fun. :) And as its not much work to get the engine over 700 or 800hp you don't have to fear a stock rs8 v10+ there.

[@ShermanMR2]

Man that car is a total sleeper.

[@Rentta]

Rs6 estate is even more so

[@sv.motorsports]

Not sure something wearing an RS badge can be called a sleeper.. i mean.. we know it means bout to get killed lol

[@Grenyas]

Amazing! I just wanted this video to keep going.

[@Noposwowskis]

Nice video, makes me appreciate the RS7 even more now

[@cedrick305]

That Audi is a special car.

[@MrKart51]

This is fantastic. Very well written and edited. Congrats on kicking everyones ass haha

[@eggbirdtherooster]

One of the nicest Audi's you can buy today!

[@Dormantee]

fantastic narration. Always look forward to your content Mr. Hooniverse!

[@luisfabriciogarbato9656]

I have one, exact same car, but not the performance, the 560HP one 2016 prestige. And this car is no joke...one of my friends has a 2015 Huracan and literally he was jealous of my rs7 when we were "playing" a little bit when driving from Austin to Houston... that car is no Joke!

[@midnightrider379]

Good job Jason. Hope to see more videos from you in the future.

[@BrendanMacWade]

What a gorgeous video. Well done, Jason and crew!

[@PrecisionBoost]

Thanks Brendan!

[@aaronwalcott513]

Three 458 Italia owners disliked this video. :O

[@RxSwolldier]

Aaron Walcott lol he made a comeback with another car just had to be faster

[@Geodreamcatcher]

I'm so proud for this video! It shows the car of my life as it is! Perfectly amazing!

[@a32tl]

My new favorite car is the 2016 Audi RS7 Performance. Awesome vehicle!!

[@michaelstechnologychannel9918]

Wow this is a top notch video. With the editing and scripts you gusy have with these videos you guys should be way past a million subs. Bravo, great video. loved it

[@PrecisionBoost]

We are getting organic growth and it's been building over time. Thanks a lot for your positive comments!

[@thehackerpro007]

I settled for an audi s7, i'm still pretty happy with it😊😊

[@joaopaulolemos6001]

dude, awesome video.. you just got yourself a fan here... really surprised that the 458 couldn´t stand a chance, never would´ve imagine that... this RS7 Performance is a rocket, very impressive... anyway, keep up the great work..

[@cns7126]

Best car review for us motor heads that are tired of watching cars drift in figure 8 (MotorTrend). Super video guys, I did not want it to be over!

[@PrecisionBoost]

Thanks a lot! It was a hell of a lot of fun to make, the second day when everybody left I starting doing half-mile hot laps. They pretty much had to tell me to leave.

[@emmanuelojukwu8001]

just stumbled upon this channel. great reviews, great editing, great explanations, and current content. Many awful car review channels on KZbin, cheers to a job well done guys.

[@PrecisionBoost]

Thanks a lot, we have a many new things in the works. Stay tuned and thanks for watching.

[@ghostmarketing2001]

I just want to say thank you for making this video...I just wish you would've had the Audi sport/Akrapovic exhaust on the car when you ran... Believe me it makes a huge difference!

[@PrecisionBoost]

Thanks for watching. As cool as an aftermarket exhaust would be on the RS7 the factory spec press car did much better than I expected.

[@ghostmarketing2001]

Jason Connor @TerminatorConn I dyno'd my RS7 with the Akrapovic exhaust (factory option) it has 640hp and 630ft-lb at the crank...

[@ConstantineJoseph]

The stock non Performance is already insane. The performance is just heavenly. That raw stock exhaust is simply breathtaking. What's better is the valve switching to 4 valves during economy mode driving which is most of the time. Economy is just spectacular for a super sports saloon over c63 or M6. So versatile, cheaper than BMW and Merc and yet provides the best value.

[@MrDrmorbid]

Nomenclature is a bit wrong: the "ur-s6" was actually the "ur-s4" when Audi still had the three digit nomenclature system. Then they began using A as the prefix before the class number, after which they changed the name to the "S6". When the first A4/S4 came out, the original S4/100 was then coined by Audifans/Quattro List as the "ur-S4".

[@stevenberson8991]

Awesome video. Keep up the good work!

[@universeu7289]

Glad to see that my tuned s6 will go head to head with the stock rs7 performance at least to 0-200 km/h :)

[@westy44cal]

Great video. Seems like a tune and light bolt on mods gets these things to mid 10's at over 130 mph in the quarter. That is wicked fast!

[@rashawnpouchie3784]

Nicely done video folks. I love it.

[@MarcusSlater]

Trapping 150 in a half mile huh? From a dig you say? And the tires? To shreds you say?

[@TheHooniverse]

Thank you Farnsworth, but the all-wheel-drive system helps sort the launches nicely. #GOODNEWSEVERYONE!

[@SvenTeresniak]

What do you think the word "quattro" stands for? ;)

[@sv.motorsports]

@@SvenTeresniak It means 4. Literally just means 4.

[@SvenTeresniak]

@@sv.motorsports Ah. Must be the first time you get in touch with Audi...

[@sv.motorsports]

@@SvenTeresniak??? No, but I know the Spanish, Italian and Latin languages and quattro just means 4.

[@voluntarydetour]

The intro made me cry. The ending made me laugh. The middle made me go "neat." Needs better jacket choices solid 5/7

[@PrecisionBoost]

No jackets were worn / harmed in the making of this film

[@kilo3o3]

It would be awesome to see an APR stage 3 tune on that beast of a machine!!!

[@TheVranac87]

Nice video,you got a new subscriber

[@mc3films]

You're the best, Jason!

[@PrecisionBoost]

Your camera work on this film was absolutely stellar!

[@alexhan6780]

Such a well done video. Would love a bit more technical details next time on what makes it so fast.

[@PrecisionBoost]

I tried, but there was so much I already had to put in and it was a 10 minute film as is.

[@reaniegane]

Awesome video, minimal face show and more car - that's what I like. Forgot to mention 0 to 60 time.

[@PrecisionBoost]

I did mention it, 3.3 seconds

[@owen3777]

Thanks for this video! This is my DREAM car!!

[@ramal593-v1j]

looks like a great time, just for curiosity's sake how much would it cost to enter one of those airstrip events? couldn't find it on there website.

[@PrecisionBoost]

$250 per day and they run Saturday / Sunday for their events

[@ramal593-v1j]

+Jason Connor @TerminatorConn wow that is not bad at all. how many runs did you get per day?

[@PrecisionBoost]

Day one was super busy so 10 throughout the whole day. At the end of day two where a lot of the GoPro content came from. I was hot lapping about 10 runs in an hour because everybody was leaving. That day I probably got about 25 runs in total.

[@Ivan-hx7cc]

This RS7 is the devil himself lol ...BRUHH

[@timmietz]

That's very impressive!! My TT Stage 2 E63 runs 154-155 in 1/2 mile but that's a modified car.

[@PrecisionBoost]

That's pretty impressive. I found that the trap speeds didn't matter much against what I was racing for the most part because I got there quite a bit quicker.

[@HPM2024]

The RS7 does NOT compete with the CTS-V. It competes with the M6 Gran Coupé, CLS63 AMG and Porsche Panamera. How do you car reviewers not know this? 🤦🏻‍♂️

[@swaagadohnn]

dream car, this car will be a beast if you tune it trust me.

[@BradMarchandtheSlewFooter]

How did you use launch control with the ZF transmission?

[@Thelnferno]

It doesn't technically have launch control, but it does have AMAX mode, which yields quicker shifts. Turn off TC, go in Sport Mode, mash brake, mash gas, let off brake.

[@blkvettez0630]

great video!! ver well done!..I enjoyed it from beginning to end!!.... oh btw! I'm a proud RS7 owner to boot!

[@johncrazy8756]

its biggest advantages are AWD / LC, and of course it has tons of power.

[@dylanr.7713]

Very nice video

[@francoisdepayras5974]

Great Video. Well done.

[@bjk3bjk]

Outstanding! 150mph stock in the 1/2 is fast for any car...let alone a 4 door, 4,500lbs luxury sedan!

[@danmurphy1994]

I think the RS7 interior quality matches its price, remember its on the older audi platform, an updated one that has the same tech as the r8,q7,tt and A4 will come in 2018 i Believe

[@93remix]

HOONIVERSE GUYS: I like seeing this video. it was truly a speed of beauty to see the RS7comp put all those tuners to rest and what makes it all better is that it comes from the factory like that. anywho, no one has even tried to do the same with a upscale 4DOOR COUPE (lol x 100, what will they think of next??!!) and the 4DC i'm talking about is the ALPINA B6 GRAN COUPE... are u guys thinking what i'm thinking?? i'd like to see the ALPINA B6's 590ft tq vs the RS7comp's 553ft tq. now, I know 4 a fact that CARmagazine had the M6 GranCoupe vs the RS7 non-comp like 3years ago.(the AUDI won, but the BMW didn't have AWD, but the Alpina does) both of these cars have taken LUXURY AND PERFORMANCE TO A WHOLE NEW LEVEL. u think u guys could put that type of comparo together?

[@TheHooniverse]

+93remix We don't get much love from BMW, so I don't think an Alpina version is in the cards for us.

[@93remix]

The Hooniverse well... there's another channel out there that did a comparo with a donor car. C'MON GUYS!! DO IT FOR THE HOONs! I've got a million of ideas I can shoot your way. if I win the MEGAMILLIONS/POWERBALL THIS WEEKEND... I'LL GLADLY LOAN U MY ALPINA (and now I wake up)... DAMN

[@jean-pierredejager1517]

the audi comes from the factory and alpina is like a tuner such as abt for audi, and the 720hp rs7 abt is way faster as that alpina

[@ghostmarketing2001]

BMW trolls swear an M6 can beat an RS7 let alone a B6 lmao I already know neither can but it's definitely fun messing with the trolls about it.

[@93remix]

ghostmarketing2001 riiiiite... I just wanna see a comparison

[@texastriguy]

Something doesn't add up. The 458 and the S6 supposedly making 580whp lagged that far behind a car supposedly making 600 crank, or perhaps 500whp that weighs more? It's a press car - something tells me it's NOT quite the exact same RS7 you'd get if you ordered one from a dealer. I test drove a brand new RS7 Performance this week. I'm the owner of a modified 2nd generation (not current gen) CTS-V. A wagon as well. The RS7 was nowhere close to the modified CTS-V. Now I know I'm comparing two totally different beasts here. The RS7 was a smooth, quiet, comfortable ride - a tad better than the CTS-V. And the latest technology in the RS7 is light years ahead. But there was an ocean between the performance of the RS7 versus the CTS-V. The RS7 launches really, really hard. So MOST of that shiny 3.3 second 0-60 time comes in the first few feet. Once over 20 or 30mph, it's all over for the RS7. For anyone that's been to an airstrip event, they well know that a TON of built cars will easily beat the RS7 in stock form. None of this is to say that the RS7 isn't an amazing piece of engineering - it IS. But holding it up against cars that often put down 800 to 1000whp and come in at a lower weight is just claiming you can violate the laws of physics. The RS7 is good, but not THAT good.

[@geraldydossous678]

Great video, the rs7 performance is so joke. I need that in my life.

[@amartin444]

Give me this and a CTSV!! Garage heaven 😎

[@iabsoluteagreewithyourcomm1451]

I’m buying this car, but I’ve been researching and the depreciation is insane in the first 4 years, here in Canada In drops from $150k new to $100k in 3 yrs, so in 4-5 yrs maybe another $30-40k, great bang for your buck if u buy it 5 yrs old

[@rudye2323]

Great vid!!! now i wanna return my rs5 asap... But dam i hate that price tag lol go audi!!

[@Divine_Serpent_Geh]

That S6 could not had 580WHP. That's 720+hp at the crank. That S6 would need to have upgraded turbos, intake, full exhaust, and ecu. So from what I just watched, This RS7 would need about 800hp to clobber it like it did. Perhaps you meant that the S6 had 580CHP. Now that being said....... This thing is BEYOND nuts. It is so underrated. Does it make sense that modified turbos, airflow, and ecu tunes will ONLY add up to 45+hp?? Nope. I can't wait to see this things on a dyno. "Regular RS7's" dyno consistently around 480HP. I'm going to go on a limb and say this thing puts down ~550 at the wheels. As does the new S8 plus.

[@DifferentialGeometry]

Just bought mine!

[@99MCougar]

This is the worse review ever. You didn't say anything about the navigation and tire pressure! * * * * But in all seriousness awesome review and kick ass car. I was just hoping to make the next KZbin comment podcast. You guys rock.

[@TheHooniverse]

hahaha - I only saw the initial snippet of the comment... nicely done. -JG

[@richystar2001]

GtR sounds like it's going to explode so much Drama like a formula 1 race .. R7 sounds like you backing out of the driveway and going to the mall then you realise that you're going 150 mph.

[@EllisBatishchev]

Love this review!

[@EdHorch]

I promise I'm not trolling, but were there any Teslas out there that day? The other big question I have is how a Hellcat would do if it were driven by someone who really knew what they were doing (e.g., not me). I've seen Hellcats get smoked a lot, but there were almost always driver mistakes. Looked at another way, how would a Hellcat do if it had launch control. (N.B.: For my kids-in-college budget, a CPO S5 is on the short list for my next car.)

[@drovid008]

I remember seeing a video of tesla p90d getting smoked by an RS7, and since dodge is RWD I'd assume it's slower. Could be wrong though, like I was with a Ferrari F12...

[@joobaggs6886]

+Ed Horch this is a half mile run, p90d would get pulled on hard after 100 mph.

[@FSProduction154]

great intro music. what is the name of the intro song?

[@mattnycm3]

Wow!! I think I want one.

[@foxracermach5]

was there any stock 2016 CTSVs running at shift sector ?? what where there times?

[@PrecisionBoost]

I ran a 600 wheel horsepower 2nd Generation CTS-V and it really wasn't close.

[@foxracermach5]

manual car or auto? most of the v guys I see in 2nd generations with mods are doing around 153 moh+ I figured it would be a close race. Lots of the CTSV owners like the RS7.

[@PrecisionBoost]

I believe it was an auto. Something I realized quite quickly at Shift Sector. Trap speed and getting there first are really different over the half-mile. If it takes you a quarter mile just to put your power down and the other guy rockets ahead of you, the race is lost. Maybe it's my drag racing roots, but getting there first rather than an 18mph higher speed is the ultimate goal.

[@SrchangwaytogoC]

What a beast.

[@Osama-cy1ch]

I wonder how this compares to the S8 Plus...

[@93remix]

I forgot to say: I LOVED THIS VIDEO, WATCHED IT 2WICE and, the CTS-V isn't the only kid in the sand box with that type of POWER to throw sand... the ALPINA B6 GRAN COUPE can also compete and this 1 from the BWM group has AWD... bye bye CTS-V

[@vince99frc]

Yes pretty impressive against the competition it was up against and being stock. Most are not stock anymore.

[@whiskey4609]

but doesn't the rs7 understeer like hell? compared to the cts v that can actually turn in well.

[@PrecisionBoost]

Not for how / where I was driving it. I'm sure if you pushed the cornering limits on the track it probably would understeer. For how I drove it (not counting the Shift Sector portion) I feel the RS7 Performance is faster is most normal situations where you would have time to put the throttle down.

[@SvenTeresniak]

There is a moderate understeering in slow corners but if you push the car hard enough it is easy to oversteer. You can also do donuts on aphalt if you like.

[@kilove1]

A true beast..RS7

[@QuavyQua]

I don't usually like mustangs but 4:58 😍

[@iggyGOGO1]

dang that cobra

[@Toyota4Life]

I dont like the back end of the RS7 but damn its a sleeper. That engine and drivetain its nice... but i think it would have lost roll racing to most of those cars.

[@tekkai235]

GTR still the king of the street. But AUDI FTW!

[@BradMarchandtheSlewFooter]

What's funny is the the new R8 can beat it... with no turbo... and less torque...

[@xmark9x598]

I want this car sooo bad :(

[@fnfastone]

Just can't get over the Turtle styling and the Wheels. ugh

[@Peter-cn4os]

I would love to see it go head to head with the new Ferrari GTC4 lusso.

[@PrecisionBoost]

The GTC4 Lusso won't be out until later this year and the RS7 will already be three model years old by then. By VAG standards it will be ancient.

[@rashawnpouchie3784]

....that 458 wasn't really being serious in that race, was it?

[@killasmoke1519]

Hahahaha he pulled out that spyder

[@Vazin]

Audi

[@GeoZeppelin1979]

actually.....the s8 (with the same engine 4.0T) is faster than rs7 on a straight line but after it picks up speed rs7 nails it

[@Dgannt]

Fast acceleration straight forward, thanks to AWD, has always been Audi's strength, just like now with Tesla. But if you want a big and powerful sedan with more feel (no numb feedbacks), less understeer and fun in the twisties, then there is only M5. If the "real world" is rain and snow then there are better options than a $140K sedan.

[@TheHooniverse]

+Fast Er I'd happily take the CTS-V over the M5. I'd save a few thousand dollars and have a more enjoyable car. The M5 isn't bad, it's just that it's not the king of the hill anymore. -JG

[@PrecisionBoost]

I don't get the fizzles for the M5. I just don't feel passionate about it at all. Straight line speed is fine but it only goes so far. The Tesla while nice isn't an all rounder for me. For this "class" I'm still sticking with the S8, if balls out craziness is high on my list of priorities I'd go with the significantly less expensive Charger Hellcat.

[@thainaaier]

+Fast Er The M5 was great in 1986... I wanted one then !!! ...... but now ??? just NO !!! because there is a lot better out there !!!

[@amartin444]

+The Hooniverse you sir have good taste. The V is badass.

[@jwj500]

+Jason Connor @TerminatorConn I love the S8. Now that is a car that offers luxury and speed with a beautiful interior, (and less money then the blazingly fast RS7).

[@46CMRossi]

CEE-OH-Double N

[@adamwolsmann6255]

Something happened with that s6. Running 89 mph. That's A4 numbers

[@brandonmaxwell364]

Now I can put a face to cammed and tubbed

[@PrecisionBoost]

I'm sure Brad and Cam would say otherwise since they have to look at my mug every week.

[@openplz3000]

3.3 to 60, dam! if the other guy falls asleep at the tree it's all over. if U Rev 2000 and stomp it at the second yellow good buy anything. I pulled up to a older lady in a red RS7 the other day, beautiful car, and a wee beastie of a 4L. my wife drives a "hot V" 4.4L twin turbo 550xi. Not near as fast since it is stock, but man does it get hot in that engine bay, way worse tag the tweeted out Turbo Buick that sits right next to it. I bet you could cook the Easter ham in that engine bay after all those passes. Did mph suffer as it got hotter? LOL you hole shot the ferrari

[@PrecisionBoost]

The most it dropped was 2 mph but that was after 10 consecutive runs.

[@incediery]

I think audi intentionally hobled this car with insanely heavy wheels so as not to kill its own R8 supercar...the old rs7 got 3.2 seconds to 60 this thing has to be faster...as for the handling sure more body roll but the thing still turns credit torque vectoring trick brakes Audi is master of car dynamics....

[@drovid008]

+Jason Connor I'm the owner of rs7gram, could you please DM me some pictures of this beauty, if you took any? Thanks.

[@PrecisionBoost]

Sent via IG

[@Mimsk]

I just cant get over how fooking big the RS7 is though. I don't consider it a sports car. Why not put that engine in the new RS5 instead?

[@PrecisionBoost]

I never said sports car, a sport sedan it clearly is.

[@AprilVic]

+Mimsk If they put the engine in the RS5, then RS6/7,S8, R8 would have a hard time to sell.

[@MrMlbfan6]

You forgot the m6 gc, cls63 e63. Also the RS5 is going to be miss

[@PrecisionBoost]

There were so many cars we filmed over two days I just couldn't get all of them into one film.

[@HPM2024]

The CTS-V is not a competitor. It competes with the M5, E63, S6. The RS-7 competes with the M6 Grand Coupe, CLS-63 and Porsche Panamera Turbo. All of which are coupe based sedans. Cadillac doesn't make a car like that and doesn't have a true competitor to them.

[@PrecisionBoost]

...semantics

[@vernonprice5986]

Right, so the CTS-V costs less, has more HP, more torque, less weight, better handling and a higher top speed. Why would you buy an RS7 again? This car is $140k, the CTS-V is almost literally half as much money and has measurably better performance in every way. Unless you count traction from a dead stop as "performance". Oh, and the CTS-V is faster than the hellcat too. Please note that the CTS-V makes over 100 more lb-ft of torque than the Audi. One thing that needs to be pointed out: In this video, Jason talked about launching and "real world" a great many times. So many times, in fact, that it started to sound like an excuse for the CTS-V being faster, as if he were trying to put the idea into our heads that the RS7 is just going to be faster, and that it "feels" faster (nice objective journalism there Jason) even though the numbers are not on the RS7's side. Yes, AWD and traction are a thing. Yes, the RS7 launches very well and no, it's not slow. But launching well and being fast are two different things, and this is not something that should not have to be explained. If you really wanted to back up those statements, what you would do is put a set of drag radials on a CTS-V, and race it from a stop against the RS7, to eliminate the inherent traction advantages of the RS7. This would be done in order to determine which car is actually faster without using the RS7's superior traction as a crutch. The trap speed will speak the truth regardless (126-127 mph for the CTS-V in the real world so far), but a lot of people are very stupid and believe AWD makes a car "fast". See example: Tesla P90D. Racing from a roll is actually a thing too, and when you go from a roll, traction is not an issue and the CTS-V would win there too. All these things need to be taken into account if you're going to claim that the RS7 "feels" faster. It should be noted that engines like the RS7's 4 liter TT V8 that make considerably more HP than torque do tend to "feel" faster in the same way that VTEC engines "feel" fast. It's because of the power curve and the way the engine is built to make all its power on the top and end build dramatically to it. Where the CTS-V makes almost the same torque as HP and consequently may not "feel" faster, and yet it sure the hell is.

[@PrecisionBoost]

+Vernon Price I'll address your points. The CTS-V normally equipped is about $90k. Most press vehicles I've been around are $95-98k so it's well above and not "literally" half-priced. But yes the performance figures are similar. The RS-7 Performance can be had at $125k if you so desire as the options that made this one $140k don't really affect performance at all. The CTS-V can be had at $85k so they are more "similarly" priced. You are addressing things from a strictly numbers perspective. My "objective journalism" is that of an opinion teller, not a specifications teller. I don't spit off spec sheets on a whim and I am stating my feelings and opinions of the cars I present. Let's be real, no owner of either car is going to track them (road course) so all of that data is superfluous. Both the CTS-V and RS7 will see normal duties as a daily driver which the owners will occasionally have a highway romp or those who have access will enjoy on the Autobahn. That was my whole premise for this story. 100 lb-ft of torque down from the CTS-V doesn't mean anything to me as the RS7 is very efficient in the terms of power delivery. The whole power delivery for me is why it "feels" faster. I agree with what you say AWD doesn't automatically make a car fast, but power delivery sure does. I'm claiming how the car comes fully stock from the factory, as soon as you put drag radials on anything it's technically modified. I'm sure you can go the ECU tuning route which brings up a completely different argument. Take it for what it's worth. I love the CTS-V and I love the RS7. I have zero brand loyalty and the CTS-V comparison comment was simply for context.

[@PrecisionBoost]

TL; DR

[@vernonprice5986]

Jason Connor @TerminatorConn Seriously? That's really shitty of you. I'm sorry you can't hold up your end of a discussion, or are too thin-skinned to handle criticism.

[@singel09]

Brings out a 900hp 911 to get even ... hilarious .. Let me bring my F-16 , then I can beat your Piper ... I would be thinking twice to bring out that much to beat an RS7 performance ... Some you win, some you loose, deal with it mister super car owner .. Oh an by the way, the trunk of the RS7 was loaded with all the gear for a weeks holiday.

[@PrecisionBoost]

I thought it was funny and a definite use of "one upmanship" (if that's even a word)

[@RxSwolldier]

Lol the only thing that beats audi launch control is porsche launch control

[@lfordphotography]

RxSwolldier Exactly. And considering both are owned by Volkswagen...........

[@tmat04]

Perfect example as to why Ferrari is overrated! Despite being heavier and having fewer hp than the Ferrari 458, the GTR still wouldn't fall to the RS7, like the Ferrari did. But, still, kudos to Audi.....The RS7 is a beast!

[@marvintyson]

Worst drivers? Come to Ohio.

[@shining_buddha]

Shit roads?😰 You didn't see our Russian roads😭

[@tbn22]

Tesla fanboys hate this

[@Okoic12CSP]

Nice car but 140k.........................

[@thainaaier]

+Cedric Okoi ... but compare it to a less practical Ferrari or Lamborghini, then the 140K is a bargain for the performance and refinement and usability you get in one single car

[@jaymario2]

+Cedric Okoi I gotta agree.. I wonder what 20K of mods on the CTS-V would do ..

[@Okoic12CSP]

+Julian M thats what I was thinking. If you want luxury and performance you can grab a CTSV and throw 20k, or if you are more into the performance you can get a hellcat and throw another 20k into it and you still well under a 100k. 140k for a car I just cant fathom, hell my house brand new was 166k lol some perspective

[@tmat04]

The facelift P90D and P100D can beat the RS7 from 0-60mph and to the 1/4 mile, though. But, still, I love the RS7!

[@PrecisionBoost]

It'll do it once, maybe twice. Not ALL day over two days, can't beat internal combustion at times.

[@BradMarchandtheSlewFooter]

Telsa is a battery

[@tmat04]

Jason Connor @TerminatorConn It can do it all the time. Are you sane?

[@BradMarchandtheSlewFooter]

Depending on battery levels, times will vary.

[@tmat04]

***** While is it true that it depends upon the battery level, a Tesla P100D is still a 10 seconds car with 50% charge (or even slightly less that). That means a P100D can still toast an RS7 in a drag race, with 50% battery charge.

[@shoryurepa1]

And this RS7 is bone stock. Image with some performance mods in there? It would have given the 911 a run for it's money