2018 VW Polo 1.0 (75 HP) TEST DRIVE

2018 VW Polo 1.0
55 kW / 75 HP
See more click here...
Interior & Cockpit Design
Exterior Design
Driving & Sound / POV
Light Night Design
Computer & Entertaiment on Board
Fuel Consumption in Various Speed and Full Throttle
Acceleration 0-170 km/h
Top Speed German Autobahn
Flat Road Topspeed 175-180 km/h
Downhill +190 km/h
5-Speed Manual

[@arminsteinke2301]

Normal Polo ohne viel Bling Bling. Klasse Auswahl Testdrivefreak. Super Format ohne Nervmucke und Blabla Testervisage ständig im Bild! Nur für 6. Gang ist VW zu knauserig !

[@Nichtswert]

Armin Steinke Ja obwohl die hätten einfach das vom Golf reinstecken müssen. Aber VE eben. Lange keine Innovation, lieber sparen sparen sparen.

[@fawoo_4235]

why need a golf when a polo is almost as big and as practical but cheaper

[@BASH_ANGEL]

And yet you dont even own one.

[@Serbo-Greek]

Is this the black paint or the urano grey?

[@ΜιχάληςΤΖ-ν7δ]

The tail reminds me of the pre-facelift mk2 BMW 1series

[@mohammedchihabzejli3957]

Good test Thx

[@Lol203]

Das sind nicht die originalen Halogenbirnen oder machen die so ein weißes Licht?

[@Sn4p_Fps]

I got 2020 version whit 80hp, nice car

[@jiiova1]

1.0 mpi u recommend it?

[@Sn4p_Fps]

@@jiiova1 how much hp ? And year ?

[@jiiova1]

@@Sn4p_Fps Do you recommend : polo 6 1.0 mpi 80 hp 2018? I have a clio 3 1.5 dci turbo diesel but i wanted to buy polo for city driving it good or no?

[@Sn4p_Fps]

@@jiiova1 For city and travels is fine and comfy , but is not fast and you have to downshift often before overtaking or to recover speed , max speed is around 178-180. The only cons is that have no turbo , but the engine sound is nice and you have to drive it easy . It’s a nice car if you don’t surpass 120-130 it won’t drink too much.

[@jiiova1]

@@Sn4p_Fps i live in a small city, i wont probably go above 110

[@Eliano55]

Test drive 1.0 TSI 115ps either Polo or Ibiza, please!

[@britishentertainment7610]

Too fast and too expensive. 1.0 95 best

[@rednaxrety]

If my hearing isn't playing tricks with me, I think I hear the clutch pedal squeaking a lot😕 [12:55] . Or is that just you having wet shoes on?

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

+VW-GROUP LOVER it was clutch pedal, it was so annoying, i was in 1hour traffic jam and it was so annoying

[@rednaxrety]

TEST DRIVE FREAK yes I believe that's pretty annoying. I'm beginning to think that the quality of VW brand cars is going down quit rapidly. I own a Polo 6R and I'm not really satisfied with it's reliability. VW's from the early 2000's were much better quality products.

[@davianceable]

Omg flywheel broke on 7 years car unblievable one of most pricey part of a car but ı heard from different ppl too like they burn flywheel of a 0 polo in 6 months.

[@krunobrzi666]

Knowing many mechanics who work in VW services, I can tell you that VW last 8 years or even longer, produces garbage. They are overpriced, unjustifiably keep the price as used, very unreliable. Golf 5 was last made to last long, all this after that is very bad.

[@segoiii]

"VW's from the early 2000's were much better quality products." No. I own a 2001 Lupo and it´s the same piece of crap in terms of long term reliability. The electric windows broke 2 times on this car. The second time i repaired it myself and saw why they break. It´s cheap plastic clips that hold the weight of the window and - of course - break after some time. The engine on the Lupo has massive knocking (all those 1.0 and 1.4 of this age have it). The clutch is very stiff and squeaks, too. The spark cables break every 50.000km. The seats are squeaking. The airbag steering ring makes noises while steering. It loses cooling water (however not much) and nobody knows why. I think it´s head gasket. Fuelpump broke. One lock is worn out and hangs. At least, the engine has not frozen to death yet, which is quite common on those engines. VAG long term reliability is crap since about 15 - 20 years. Look at the gasoline engines on Golf 4. 1.4 -> freezes 1.6 -> gearbox rivets break 1.8 -> OK 2.0 -> oil consumption due to piston rings wear out 2.3 VR5 -> timing chain problems (tradition on Volkswagens) 2.8 VR6 -> timing chain problems ... It´s ridicolous. In those times at least the diesel engines were okay. The 1.9 TDI without PD were great. Today even the Diesel engines are crap (on almost every 1.6 CR the AGR broke). My next car will be a Mazda with one of those high compression gasoline engines. VW simply is junk in nice looking package.

[@sleepingPikachu025]

260 km/h is too much... Speedo must be 200 or 220 km/h for such of this slow car, with 0-100 time almost 15 seconds.

[@OldSkoolLover1996]

The Polo GTI will almost do that speed and it is the same car basically. They don't make different gauges for the same car just because the car has a different engine in it... I believe they do it to save money.

[@squirtlydude6812]

Finde die Halogen Lichter passen nicht .. und der neue Polo in der Farbe energetic orange sieht viel saftiger aus

[@ivan2653]

Масло жрёт?

[@MrTruth111]

I am going to private lease this, I want a new car for a change. Black, automatic, mmmmm

[@passatr3650]

This car have 5 gears not 6 😉

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

oh damn, you are right, i forgot it, that was 5 gears, :D mostly manual cars that i drove was always 6 gears :D

[@passatr3650]

TEST DRIVE FREAK yeah 6 gears should be standard :D

[@ronaldderooij1774]

Why? When I was young, cars had three gears and automatics sometimes two. Functioned perfectly. I don't see the added value of going from 5 to 6 gears unless you love to change gears. If you do my personal opinion is that that is weird. I drive automatic therefore (CVT)

[@yunusemreozdemir1074]

Türkiye deki polo lar ile arasında dağlar kadsr fark var bizdekiler çöp resmen

[@AmongUs-mb4qx]

1.0 3-potter with 75hp? What year is this? 1975?

[@AmongUs-mb4qx]

P1/\/K Still Japanese cars with bigger engines get better fuel economy, jokes on Polo.

[@ronaldderooij1774]

Well, the Mitsubishi Mirage has a 3 cylinder engine with 1.0 liter too... 70 hp. And the fuel consumption at constant speeds is the same as the Polo. In normal use the Mirage is better thanks to far lower revs or CVT. I own the 1.2 liter version. It does everything a car has to do for very little money.

[@AmongUs-mb4qx]

Ronald de Rooij Mirage weighs 20-25% lesser too! It's a size smaller and has better aerodynamics as well! No comparison whatsoever, it's more closer to VW Up! Unless you like horse carts, no point in underpowered engine

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

@@cristiancostea1 Mazda reaches a even lower level of fuel consumption, with a 1,5 litre line - 4 (Mazda 2 G75).

[@britishentertainment7610]

@@TheCrankshaftRotator no it doesnt and polo is bigger and faster

[@royals3248]

The first brand new vw polo 1.0 without turbo video.It is fabulous!!Thank you very much.

[@OldSkoolLover1996]

I did it. I bought one. Thanks!

[@OldSkoolLover1996]

I should mention I got the 95hp version

[@azuris221]

how is the car. how quiet,comfort, tech, what are the pros and cons so far?

[@OldSkoolLover1996]

@@azuris221 I'm a bit late but I think this is a good time to answer your comment. The car is quite good I should say. It is fairly quiet for it's class, if not the best.. You don't really have to speak up when having a conversation whilst driving on the highway so that's very good, also the engine is nice and smooth when you are cruising. It's only when you rev it hard that it is a bit rough ofcourse. Comfort is okay, but I do have slight regrets getting 17" wheels on it because that makes the ride a bit harsher but not too bad either. I think it would be very good otherwise! It's nice and roomy inside too. Pros: Quiet, very low fuel consumption, easy to drive, nice to look at. Cons: A bit of a harsher ride because of the 17" alloys. Also, over bumps I do get rattles from the b pillar and some other place I can't really tell. That started after 6 months. If you are still considering this car I would say get the standard 15" wheels if you want the best comfort this car can offer. Other than that there isn't much that should go wrong really! Cheers!

[@azuris221]

@@OldSkoolLover1996 thanks very much. Just the answere i needed right now while making my desitions

[@Trespasser17]

In black colour new polo definitely get character and elegance! Looks way better than in silver and other colours.

[@Thyriss]

Gute Videos machst du. Weiter so. Like hast du dir verdient. :)

[@deniscoeso]

VW Polo 2018 made in Brazil 1.0 flexfuel - 75 cv/84 hp - 9,7/10,4 kgfm (gasoline / ethanol) - MT5 1.6 flexfuel - 110/117 hp - 15,8/16,5 kgfm (gasoline / ethanol) - MT5 1.0 Tsi flexfuel - 116/128 hp - 20,4 kgfm (gasoline or ethanol) - AT6

[@clarencelacht]

Thanks for the video. It gave me a good insight. And I love that there is no flashy talking in the video, just te car and the things you need to make a choice. I am thinking about this motor because it is 2000 euro cheaper than the TSI model. I also see that the comfortline model is equipped enough...

[@francolopez-richard1432]

Bravooo super Video...Echt genial...Grüsse aus Norwestspanien sendet Dir Franco mach so weiter..Alles gute....Pst:Bin echt einen VW Fan habe selber einem Golf7 GTI...Tschüssli

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

Nice car, poor engine. It´s about time to replace the weak, restless running 1.0 natural aspirated engine against one with 4 cylinders and more size (1,6 litre, like in the 6N, would be appropritate). I think, the WLTP unstead the NEFZ will do it.

[@ronaldderooij1774]

I have a similar engine in my Mitsubishi Space Star. It completely serves my needs. I do not want to pay more for things I do not need. Besides that, I can still get myself massive police fines for speeding with this engine if I wanted.

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

Ronald de Rooij It's Not about power, it is about running culture.

[@HermanWillems]

@@TheCrankshaftRotator But this engine creates low taxes and cheap to buy. If VW would put in a big engine with more CO2 per km.. the car itself would cost THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS euro's more. Is that worth it? Sales figures say: NO. So it means you are wrong and glad VW has not hired a stupid person like you who would just let VW go bankrupt with no sales. Correct?

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

@@HermanWillems A Mazda 2 G75 isn´t more expensive than a VW Polo 1.0.

[@britishentertainment7610]

@@TheCrankshaftRotator a polo is much bettee

[@AliShah-ho7jv]

Is it possible to change those halogen bulbs to LED? or would you need to pay for new headlights?

[@astronaut205]

14:40 the acceleration is really nice for a 75hp car

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

Funny. 15. Seconds for 75 HP is very poor. A Mazda 2 G75 did it within 12 s

[@astronaut205]

@@TheCrankshaftRotator oh well this is why i havent bought it the last time.. wish it could be a little faster

[@mehmett.bakkal8257]

@@TheCrankshaftRotator its not bad though. Ford with 1.1 85 hp does the same time. And its not 15 secs, its 13,9.

[@TheCrankshaftRotator]

@@mehmett.bakkal8257 A Mazda 2 with only 75 hp does it in 12

[@mehmett.bakkal8257]

@@TheCrankshaftRotator its probably because its lighter

[@taygunterzici8318]

Mr; Is this car more performance than previous model 75 hp 1.0 mpı ? Or exactly the same?

[@aguinaldobatistadeoliveira8253]

Aqui no Brasil, é uma merda esse carro.

[@filipesoares8928]

Na Europa só se usam carros com rodas de ferro, aqui no Brasil se usar uma roda dessa e servido de chacota, se acham quando colocam uma roda de liga leve.

[@deusdedithbatistarealjuniorrea]

VERDADE, RODA DE LIGA E TODO PELADO SE QUISER ALGO TEM QUE PAGAR MAS CARO, VERGONHOSO

[@ikramuddinahmed8924]

W should continue it in India

[@rodrigoteixeiragoncalves7815]

thanks for the video, i get mi polo same os your tomorow, im probably gona do a video

[@fayrozfanta3540]

where's the video we waiting for You all

[@zecarlos1351]

O Polo 1.0 de lá vem mais completo do que um 1.6 nacional

[@filipesoares8928]

Brasil e uma merda mesmo, meu Deus, olha a diferença, era pra vim assim como o Europeu, somente uma ajuste na suspenção pra ficar mais alta

[@deusdedithbatistarealjuniorrea]

ESSE AI É O TOP DE LINHA BRASILEIRO

[@viniciusrezendebarreto9711]

Thank's for test VW Polo MPI 75hp . Positive and valid for me. Vinícius Rezende Barreto um Brazil Goiás in City Goiânia.

[@MrFdfdffdf]

Suprisingly economical.

[@horstschimanski6608]

hört sich übel an :D wie ne richtige Rennsemmel. Geht für 75PS aber gut ab. kzbin.info/www/bejne/Y3PRhaGFaNF8eZI

[@linomezzadri5181]

_Thank for video,. Ciao.

[@branislavvelemir5318]

lepši duži širi bolji od predhodnog modela boja bela i crvena sasvim su ok

[@Sameer-xq3cs]

It costs in my country no less than 23k $

[@coyko80]

Not a word?

[@florian1605]

Ich bekomme im März meinen Führerschein, habe auch schon sehr viel Geld gespart! Ich möchte auch gerne den neuen Polo....meine Frage, reichen 65 ps für fast 80 Autobahnkilometer am Tag ?? Denn 65 ps hören sich schon wenig an!!

[@kommentarschreiber2]

Ich fahre die 75PS Version von diesem Motor in einem Seat Ibiza, für "normale" Fahrten reicht er völlig aus, hat sehr wenig Verbrauch (im Schnitt 4,6L/100km) und ist sehr zuverlässig. Er geht relativ flott auf 80, danach braucht er aber ewig für jeden km/h mehr und man muss ihn auch immer hochdrehen da er unter 3000 absolut nicht vom Fleck kommt. Ich würde dir eher den 95PS TSI empfehlen, da sich dieser gefühlt wie ein Sportwagen im Vergleich anfühlt. Außerdem merkt man im Alltag keinen Unterschied zum 65PS Modell da der mit 75PS nur bei Drehzahlen um die 5-6000 mehr Leistung hat.

[@kiphoperalik]

What is this exact car called as a package? (e.g. comfort,beats, etc.)

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

comfortline

[@user-v9l2z]

Very nice car!

[@shaunmarshall4504]

14.5 seconds to 60, think of all the poor motorists behind this silly thing.

[@converx]

I‘ve read this so much but let me tell you this, I own it and honestly it is fine. It is a city cruiser that occasionally goes on the Autobahn and it is totally fine. A Polo is not a race car after all

[@РусскийМужик]

super

[@gmryldrm5764]

güzel araba kaza sıs belasıs kullan

[@Eduulopez]

yes

[@spisz5623]

glosne jak odkurzacz

[@salahr2860]

Is that the non-metallic black?

[@Stormmover]

187 kmh is this for real?

[@dirkjanssens754]

Great Job

[@leonisbacher1772]

WHAT COLOR ??

[@The.Rockman81]

Die Farbe sieht echt Stark aus Diesen Polo Krieg ich im Sommer mit 115 PS

[@TESTDRIVEFREAK]

Gute entscheidung! Mit 115 ps macht richtig spass, bestimmt hast du bessere felgen ausgesucht :)

[@fabiifabii2746]

Stefan Bausche ist das die Serien Farbe ohne Aufpreis ?

[@onderpolat8576]

👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👏👏👏👏

[@alterateawful6709]

Price?

[@bobplanderlinde329]

15k

[@honzamorgan9531]

so slow. better 1.0 tsi !! or 1.2 tsi 77kw.

[@peterdebel7379]

The He Ford Fiesta is a better drivers car. Handles Better. Quiter inside.Better brakes and more QUALITY AFTER 100.000km

[@vecteurtech1019]

NEIN! NEIN! Dummes Ungeziefer! SCHEISSE Jeder weiß, dass deutsche Qualität Autos schön und zuverlässig für das Leben macht!

[@rg6259]

This car has the most reliable VAG engine - 1.0 mpi. And what the Fiesta has...? That's right, 3 cyl turbo piece of shit. Btw Polo is much prettier.

[@jellemarona]

I had a fiesta mk8. Wasnt impressed with the quality at all

[@wtf6892]

is it black or dark grey?

[@tshidzivhe]

It's blue

[@kingchooet9966]

boring car. I wouldn't even wan't to be found dead in a car like this... 1.0? Scooter engine...

[@ronaldderooij1774]

Some people just want to go from A to B warm and dry and not spend much money on it. I am such a person and I bought a car with a similar engine. I am completely satisfied with it, thank you. I can still get myself massive, massive police fines for speeding if I wanted.

[@kingchooet9966]

Ronald de Rooij Boring you.

[@ihavenoname4851]

KingChooêt you do know this isn’t the performance model?

[@kingchooet9966]

I have no Name Of course i know but i can't imagine what a boring life you must have when you concider buying a grass mower like this...

[@ihavenoname4851]

KingChooêt it’s true but most people go for the lowest price.Also not a bad first car