2024 Week 4 Preview with Patrick Claybon and Steve Wyche

Рет қаралды 7,458

NFL Daily with Gregg Rosenthal

Күн бұрын

Пікірлер: 78

@fpsoftdev Ай бұрын

I love this preview show. Perfect cast!

@thomasfrantz8670 Ай бұрын

Love hearing Gregg's and Steve's insights! Some good analysis there.

@yttamhtims Ай бұрын

GGG’s show is pretty good. Patrick is always great, Steve is great. Really good analysis. There’s a millions shows like this, if you don’t like this one, what are you watching it for ya flogs

@alexmeyer2222 Ай бұрын

I like the crew. Patrick's "presenter voice" feels a bit forced sometimes, but overall solid, in-depth analysis

@FeelItRising Ай бұрын

Seattle made a MUCH bigger jump on D than the Lions

@reneewilliams5777 Ай бұрын

The national shows never know enough details about specific teams because they cover all teams. Some takes are just wrong and you can tell they don't what they're talking about sometimes.

@jorgmohnen2849 Ай бұрын

Vikes 29 (w/safety) P17

@creepybantha1665 Ай бұрын

I say 26 - 10

@bob_ohms2low75 Ай бұрын

34-17 Packers win it easy.

@Gooditalian Ай бұрын

What’s with all the Ads?😢

@shadycarry Ай бұрын

Chiefs offense has issues, but saying its worse than last year is a low iq opinion. Suprised Greg is lying to himself like that just bc he hates JuJu

@reneewilliams5777 Ай бұрын

McDermott has been pretty good against Lamar and the Ravens the past few years. Did you even look at the record? Beat them in the 2020 playoffs to go to the AFC championship game. Beat them in the 2022 season in Baltimore. Seems to have an idea how to slow Lamar down. Not sure exactly what the record is but probably something 3-1 in favor of Josh Allen's Bills. But we'll see.

@creepybantha1665 Ай бұрын

It's 2-1 Bills, but the one loss was in Josh Allen's first career game (in which he came in after Nathan Pederman was benched for 4 first-half interceptions). Ravens 47 - Bills 3

@jordanjmdjmd74 Ай бұрын

Was hoping for good breakdowns...instead we got "Rodgers is still mad at Payton" lmao

@scottrmm Ай бұрын

"they show up for big games" lol

@MichaelJWake95 Ай бұрын

Is Gregg not meant to be the host? Patrick just keeps taking over.

@fpsoftdev Ай бұрын

I think Patrick is a better “host” in this way. Gregg is more analytical

@MichaelJWake95 Ай бұрын

@@fpsoftdev totally agree, just seems silly to make Gregg the host if this is going to be how it ends up.

@Dudeamis17 Ай бұрын

Picking the Ravens over the Bills is so dumb

@immortangamer Ай бұрын

they are ravens apologists following the Lamar narrative

@musicnthangs9782 Ай бұрын

No it's not! Bills haven't played anybody, Ravens have had a much tougher schedule and are heating up. Ravens by 3

@reneewilliams5777 Ай бұрын

@@musicnthangs9782The Cardinals are not bad. And the Ravens lost to the Raiders. No excuses for that. And Sean McDermott has been able to slow Lamar down in the past. As recently as 2022 season. So Ravens have to prove they can beat the Bills cause it hasn't been seen in years

@reneewilliams5777 Ай бұрын

@@musicnthangs9782😂 The Raiders don't even have a starting QB and the Cowboys can't stop the run. I know they played the Chiefs but the Bills usually beat the Chiefs in the regular season and are not afraid of them in September

@truthbearer7891 Ай бұрын

That’s funny Vegas doesn’t seem to think so. They aren’t drinking koolaid on two games vs pathetic teams in Dolphins and Jaguars. Ravens have the offense to keep Josh Allen off the field and the defense for force his first couple turnovers of the season

@12WeMet1 Ай бұрын

Not crazy about how this has turned into just another nfl network show

@immortangamer Ай бұрын

Patrick Claybon the ultimate yes man

@LinkRocks Ай бұрын

Then don't watch.

@12WeMet1 Ай бұрын

@@LinkRocksI stopped, thanks for the groundbreaking advice though bud

@tjsumigray22 Ай бұрын

Patrick Claybon RUINS this entire show. Learn to shush, son.

@devanwc23 Ай бұрын

@@tjsumigray22 Patrick’s doing exactly what he’s been asked to do, intro each game exactly like he does on his other shows with Gregg! And he’s great at it Gregg needs to figure out how he wants to host, cuz he frankly is new and it shows. He needs to detect the clunkiness of their transitions and provide Patrick a better ramp for the intro. L2shush? Like fr that’s lame

@tjsumigray22 Ай бұрын

@@devanwc23 Patrick is lame. One of the many reasons ATN should have never been axed.

@devanwc23 Ай бұрын

@@tjsumigray22 lul touch grass pup

@immortangamer Ай бұрын

can we replace Claybon for a non NFL sponsored android?

@BossRoller Ай бұрын

That is probably the worst reasoned pick I've ever heard. Why not just flip a coin?

@deltonvincent Ай бұрын

I like how you guys spent less than a minute talking about the Vikings. Keep that energy so when the playoffs come around you have nothing to talk about and have to take a lay off.

@bob_ohms2low75 Ай бұрын

Dumbest takes I've ever heard. 🤦🏼‍♂️

@daltonletawsky1824 Ай бұрын

Don’t count out the colts! Steelers always play the Colts tough but something feels special about Richardson, it’s just taking a little while to bloom. Don’t be surprised if you are talking about him and Latu next week and how the Colts pop a stunner! Game will be ugly though!

@craigjacobs6249 Ай бұрын

Wishful thinking my friend. Tomlin has the team locked in. Steelers are getting Seamulo back. 20-13 Steelers

@robe2504 Ай бұрын

Fun fact - new Packers RB Josh Jacobs only went for 34 yards on 13 carries when he played for the Raiders against the Vikes last season (in Vegas), in week 14 when the Vikes didn't have an offence... Btw this flawed logic folks keep rolling out season after season about teams being the best at something - the Packers running game has had success against the Eagles, Colts and Titans. That doesn't make it the "best in the league" - it's a very flawed conclusion. They haven't played the league. The Packers have only had success against those 3 teams. The Colts have conceded the 2nd most rush yards so far, Eagles 9th, and Titans 12th. However those two numbers will always be conflated - if the Pack rush well against the Colts, the Colts rush D stats will look bad, and the Packers rushing stats will look good. Is the Packers Rush attack good or the Colts rush D just bad. The Colts conceded 210 rush yards to the Texans in week 1, conceded 260 rush yards vs the Pack in week 2, but only 70 rush yards to the Bears in week 3. So is the Colts rush D bad, or are the Packers and Texans rushing attacks both good, and the Bears rushing attack really bad? The Texans were without Mixon week 3 vs the Vikes so that skews things, (and everyone knew that before the game and still picked the Texans). Maybe week 1 helps. The Packers rushed for 160 vs the Eagles, but the Eagles rushed 140 right back. Two good rushing offences, or two mediocre rushing defences? Another fun fact - current the Vikes D has only conceded 214 yards at 3.6 yards per carry, which is second best in the league if you want to use that flawed logic. They kept Texans down to about 40 yards, 49ers down to 100 yards (averaging 160 vs others), and Giants down to 70 yards (averaging 120 vs others). Just remember what AVG did in NY to seal the game for the Vikes...