2035: The Point of No Return

[@justsomeone33]

We aren't killing the planet. We are slowly killing ourselves. The planet has survived everything. It doesn't matter what insignificant creatures live on it.

[@RedRabbleRouser]

We are the planet. We are earth become conscious. Our art and philosophy and science and religions are as much a natural process of earth as the water cycle, weather patterns, ocean currents, and ant hills. The earth as a rock will go on without us, but we are also the highest expression of the earth itself.

[@blableu4519]

*as of yet if we cannot even take care of the soil we were birthed from, what kind of merit do we deserve? after some millenias, most of the current infrastructure made of concrete will just erode back to sand, which is absolutely nothing to Earth with all of the damage we have caused to the biosphere and the atmosphere in such a short amount of time, what do our "achievements" matter for? is our relationship with this planet symbiotic or parasitic? ​@@RedRabbleRouser

[@noloveforthehaters]

Insignificant? A lifeless earth is meaningless.

[@SivanandaMeitei]

​@@blableu4519Human beings are like virus, they destroy everything they touch. Remember why Zeus refuse to give fire to human. Human are self destructive virus. 😢

[@SentientNebula]

​@@noloveforthehaters humans aren't all life.

[@vinny-is-here]

The irony is that the people who actually need to listen to this, the corporate executives, won't. We the people have already heard this too many times.

[@salomaogomes7311]

Not only that, but also the people who've been duped by corporate propaganda into believing climate change is somehow a hoax. They're downright fanatic.

[@fritzbox6764]

It's only the masses, the collective that can drive big changes. This is called revolution. If you think someone from above (government, companies, god) will come to save you, you are wrong, sadly.

[@wantsLDA]

just imagine if th3 US government released the 6000 patents they banned in the secrecy act of 1951 that literally has enough energy to completely get rid of the fuel industry but they still haven't declassified any of those patents so we can progress them more, they have a patent that could run itself off water and power an entire city with a piece of metal smaller than a car battery but they have the patents and lobbyists spend billions a yesr to keep then classified cuz it will kill the fossil fuel and combustion engine automotive industries instantly, why won't they release them?

[@TWJCole]

The ones that need to hear this is the youth

[@wantsLDA]

@@TWJCole they're too busy figuring out their gender

[@deenaxic9134]

What people fail to understand is.... The world will be fine, don't worry, it'll survive. The fate of humanity? Ah, less certain, but then again, species come and go.

[@benwherlock9869]

yes as George Carlin once said "The planet will be fine, it's the people that are fucked, we're going away folks"

[@Grassdia]

Thank god we won’t exist in 200 ish years the place is far better without us talking about dumb shit like representation and greed which are doing more harm than good

[@bjromer30]

Will androids take over post human civ?

[@deenaxic9134]

@@bjromer30 We are already working on it, filfy human. Beep beep beep.

[@AlanWilhelm-fv7to]

You say things like this as if you don’t expect to be one of the casualties. If we really are all as apathetic as you, then yes, I agree; we deserve extinction. We’ll probably survive though, ekeing out a miserable existence in the nightmare yet to come. Mankind has dropped to as low at 10k members before and squeezed through the bottleneck. The question is, will the world to come be one worth living in?

[@TheMdog8]

Our economic system is the issue. Change that, and we might stand a chance. Keep on with 'business as usual', and humanity is done for this century.

[@ruprecht9997]

Yes and no. We would never have reached our levels of technology without capitalism. It is its totalitarian trends (mega corporations larger than countries) that needs to be held back.

[@sedonars1]

Along with ALL OTHER VERTEBRATES on the planet. Mass starvation is imminent, except for the top 1% of this economic system; and that is completely OK with that same 1% who control the system 100%. They are no longer human beings; but rather Homo-Sociopaths!

[@jackiehollow6611]

Humans will not change untill the circumstances FORCE them too. Look at every single person around you, even me, and realize that you NEED to be in a position to survive. It's a mad dash to have as much resources by that time to survive the shift. start the countdown, even if it doesnt happen i feel the odds are high enough that it DOES happen that we need to be ready.

[@KasirRham]

Cooked

[@Michael0663-qo4wx]

EcoSocialism?? Unfortunately we are captured in a Capitalist Reality functioning on fossil fuels.

[@fluffybytez]

as doomed as i feel we are, pessimism is a losing game. humanity has saved themselves before, we can do it again. maybe this time, for good! excellent video!!

[@JayBullGenX]

Just drive electric cars right?

[@HighLordBlazeReborn]

We can't get the dominant power on the planet to stop breaking its own rules about a goddamned genocide. You think the same system that links all of this, the one that benefits rich white folks, is going to just give up one day and fix all of this? We're already committed to 4C increases in global temps now by the end of the century. You want shit to change? The US needs to fall. The West needs to lose power, now. Barring that there's no way out, because as long as you Americans run the planet, there's no way in hell we get out of this.

[@starrynight_._]

yeah this channel unfortunately thrives off of “deep” philosophical issues and predictions of the future, or how humanity will end. it’s a clever way to gain views. he also has multiple sponsors and sells merch, so he’s clearly trying to capitalize on this fear. i’m not downplaying the climate crisis at all, we need radical change now. though, we have to stop with these doom narratives. there are many solutions to mitigate and adapt as well as drop global emissions. there are multiple possibilities to an imperfect future where we win, as much as there are multiple possibilities of loss and destruction. we can’t afford to give up and risk any odds. “it’s too late” narratives are primarily from groups of people who are obsessed with doomscrolling or misanthropic. i’m glad to see a comment like this ;3

[@PolticalEECorrect]

it’s a tiny subset of humanity who has constructed a system that generates unfathomable wealth at the expense of the planet and people. “We” aren’t killing the planet, we are held hostage by insanely rich and greedy megalomaniacal billionaires.

[@billweir1745]

@@JayBullGenX Yep that's all it is. You got it. Good job Jimbob. Now go drink your fracked tap water like a good boy.

[@hououinkyouma5539]

It's easier to imagine the end of the world than it is the end of capitalism

[@astridisaacs8129]

We should go back to feudalism, this was never a problem before!1!1!11

[@salomaogomes7311]

This only ends one way: revolution.

[@youreyesarebleeding1368]

Capitalism is the best idea ever imagined by humanity, every other economic system is 1000x worse in comparison.

[@thatonenerd6223]

Kinda like free trade and wanting your own property is human nature lol

[@salomaogomes7311]

@@thatonenerd6223 almost like capitalism is an inherently corruptive system that's leading the world to it's destruction

[@matthewt011]

Singapore makes car prices higher to encourage people to take public transit. Singapore also forces buildings to have greenery in them. If you say the roots of the trees will destroy the building or the building needs more reinforcement, check out the Oasia Hotel. They did it differently. If all cities do what Singapore has done, carbon emissions can be reduced. Besides, offshore solar and wind farms, microalgae, heat pumps, cobalt-free batteries, Banana leaves packaging, trams/streetcars....

[@Debbie-henri]

Speaking as a gardener, pruning top growth of any plant controls root growth. So it is perfectly possible to grow whatever plants an architect wishes, so long as the residents and maintenance crew are aware of how to maintain those plants. There's nothing cruel about hard pruning of plants. Bonsai plants have survived centuries of astonishingly severe pruning, and bounce back as strong as ever. Indeed, the process constantly rejuvenates them, so they live way past their natural lifespan. It is said it could be possible to keep a Bonsai tree alive forever, and essentially the same could be done for those trees living on planted buildings.

[@8.bit_gun340]

Summers have been getting hotter recently. Anyone else feel the same?

[@justadildeau]

No

[@JairMe]

@@justadildeau FORSURE!

[@Rickenbacker451]

"Recently"? Have you been living under a stone?

[@johngaudet6316]

I recently went camping for 3 weeks and I noticed a huge decrease of insects and birds. It's kind of shocking to see that. I even drove at night a few times noticed not many insects on the front of the car if any.

[@dom5648]

i wish. I would love that. longer would be great too!

[@samipistool1715]

earth is fine. we however...

[@Prototype10_]

"The planet is fine....the PEOPLE are f#©ked!" - a wise man

[@pluto3747]

Forget us, the wildlife is finished

[@DuckDodgers69]

Exactly

[@ablejon1470]

Earth is NOT FINE. I hate that talking point with a passion. We are RESPONSIBLE for terra forming the only habitable planet we know of that can support complex life into a planet that can no longer do that. If you mean earth doesn’t have to be a vibrant living breathing planet and it can just be a hot rock in space.. OK. But the damage we do MATTERS. We place value on a planet’s capability to support complex life.. we are changing this planets capability to do that and permanently altering it’s trajectory. So stop using this perspective to soothe your feeling of dread and obligation. Do something..

[@XXFL4MINGD34THR4GEXX]

“ do something “ provides no solutions or suggestions 😂

[@Ironstarfish]

It's too late and nobody wants to say it. Even if it went to zero, it doesn't matter because the negative feedback loop is self supported already. The ocean holding CO2 releasing as it gets warmer, trapped gases in permafrost etc. Also, we can't even do simple things that dont even impact economy like painting all roofs white and no more black asphalt roads and make them at least gray white which is proven to have a cooling effect

[@enricod.7198]

Positive* feedback loop(s). If we stopped tomorrow we would get like at least 1c of warming just to reduced aerosol masking (yeah, co2 masking). We are cooked, literally.

[@christopherleubner6633]

Yup, it's a positive self reinforced feedback loop. Several have been triggered already. 2 deg C is by 2026/2027

[@KatsCorner]

We can not even walk to grocery store.

[@BufordTGleason]

It’s not that they don’t want to tell the truth. They can’t… It would be economic suicide, the whole house of cards would come down. People would stop saving…people stop paying their bills and stop working all the necessary things that people do to keep the rich people in power would not be done voluntarily as in the past if everybody knew and say 20 years it’s all over and life is just going to get more difficult exponentially until then

[@zackanderson7440]

So is there anything we can actually do or are we just fucked.

[@faarsight]

We've already reached many points of no return. I see no sign that we're going to stop hitting them like Thelma and Louise speeding towards that cliff.

[@eriklee1794]

Don't forget to hold hands

[@WilcoxNotreallythere]

This analogy works for humanity in general. At any point in time.

[@MickyGalfond]

Honestly USA is garbage so it’s fine

[@skycladsquirrel]

With the brakes on fire!

[@JasonReborn-hc6lx]

Lol. The climate change cult is full of corruption too. It's hilarious that they preach a coming catastrophe but the people doing the preaching are polluting far more than the average person. For some reason people are still dumb enough to believe them. It's ridiculous!!!

[@triplikeido75]

Unfortunately, this is far to rosy and optimistic of a summary. We're already way past the point of no return. Way, way past.

[@ruprecht9997]

I agree. So do we want to look ahead and deal with the problems, or sit down and mourn the changes?

[@enricod.7198]

Yeah like..1.5c limit? That is long gone and 2023 already saw an avg higher than that. They think that using a 10 years avg will fix that but I mean if emissions go up again and again you won't see a year below 1.5c ever again. Paris agreement was stupid when they signed it.

[@sedonars1]

We are already at 1.51c above pre industrial for the past 13 months (Copernicus). The GHGs in the atmosphere already will add another 1c over the next 10 years. GHGs are being increased by the largest incremental margins EVER. This would indicate we need to be at 0 emissions starting tomorrow; if we do that, the lack of aerosol masking will raise the temp by 1c within 90 days (thus 2.51c above). Anyone with any awareness at all knows that the "window of opportunity" to solve this problem was 1989-1994. WE ALL CHOSE NOT TO SOLVE! So, we are now in a predicament where the ONLY choice is Business As Usual = Near Term Mass Extinction, e.g. Humans erased from the planet by 2050 (but greatly reduced every year from now until then). Thanks FF Industry CEO psychopaths; you sacrificed everything to the altar of $$$!

[@ermanvis7642]

@@sedonars1 I don't think it will be that fast but the second half of this century is going to be rough ride.

[@starsiegeRoks]

​@@sedonars1so thats it? No hope? So we just sit on our hands and wait to die? If thats the case then we should all just unalive ourselves now. You can start.

[@RedHeadedCannon]

Hey, at least the Earth will continue long after we're gone. After all the wars, and nuclear winter resulting from nuking each other, give or take a couple hundred years Earth will be green again.

[@Rustea314]

Yea, a little longer. 3800+ nuclear reactors just above sea level. Big oops.

[@Rickenbacker451]

Nope, heard of forever chemicals? Earth won't be as clean as before humans for a long time.

[@SideBit]

​@@Rustea314 Nuclear reactors by and large have extremely safe failure mechanisms in place to prevent environmental disaster. The few disasters we have seen are the result of human error and extreme environmental catastrophe to exacerbate the failure. Fukishima, for example, was caused by an oversight in engineering that has since been corrected in *every* nuclear power plant in operation today. The nuclear incident in Chernobyl is even worse, the engineers flat out did not do their job correctly. The safety systems at Chernobyl plant were not automated to activate without human input and thus collapsed before they could activate properly. Now? We have failsafes in every possible place to prevent meltdowns even given human sabotage, barring a detonation of an active reactor via military forces or internal disruption. The nuclear reactors underwater are nearly harmless in the case of disaster because water absorbs radiation like nothing else, even a couple dozen meters is enough to completely negate the danger in the immediate area outside the leakage. They're so safe that the submariners that live near them are... well, totally fine for years on end. Nuclear fuel undergoing fullblown reaction is rather short lived, so given a reactor is abandoned for even a few months the fuel that's put under safety will eventually become way less reactive and essentially become another source of minimal background radiation in the local area... that's in the case of complete and utter obliteration of the plant and fuel stores. Nuclear waste, on the other hand, is stored in ICBM resistant containers that will outlast humanity by eons, and is so safe that Kyle Hill was allowed to lick one on a supervised tour of a nuclear power plant here in the U.S.A. I urge you to research safety in nuclear reactors, they really are quite non-disastrous given our current computer automated systems and even mechanical safety features to prevent disaster like at Fukushima and Chernobyl. They're built with EMP resistant circuitry as well, so forget that. As the director of aforementioned live plant said: "I know where the waste this plant is producing is, it's right HERE. Where is the waste that fossil fuels are producing?" She breathes in, "In our lungs."

[@procrastinates]

@@Rickenbacker451Eventually, those forever chemicals are going to be buried by sedimentary deposits given a few ten thousand years. If nature can thrive in the Chernobyl exclusion zone, then some forever chemicals left over by humanity will hardly affect the environment.

[@mrsoisauce9017]

@@Rickenbacker451 one word: evolution. Creatures will evolve that can break down those compounds, and then the “forever chemicals” won’t be forever anymore

[@Bigmatt7]

At this point, I really don't care if we're wiped out. It's not like I can afford anything significant like a home, or decent car.

[@beyonder7817]

yea same, even 2035 is too far , it should be sooner.

[@DeniseCoelhoEnglishForLife]

That is so selfish. Animals are suffering

[@Bigmatt7]

​@@DeniseCoelhoEnglishForLifeNobody truly gives a F

[@evil17]

@@DeniseCoelhoEnglishForLifeBulldozers are killing forests and species a lot faster by continuing on this Climate Change Ideology and Hypocracy. CO2 isnt killing us, we are.

[@starsiegeRoks]

​@@Bigmatt7i do

[@RealWildWalter]

I saw the title and knew it was about climate change. Pretty sad to think about.

[@valentina-gracemaclean9736]

Wake up there's actually no scientific evidence don't fall for that nonsense in fact carbon emissions are better than ever but no they won't tell you that will they

[@KamikazeMedias]

You mean global freezing as they told us in 1990s right? right?

[@sahilx4954]

I thought it was about AI.

[@battlecatsbunbun9643]

I thought it was about a movie.

[@swiftrebooted7704]

And I thought it wasn't actually butter.

[@keyahsblair]

Zero emissions? From whom? Airlines and millionaires jets are excluded? What is this, Hunger Games?

[@salomaogomes7311]

The main sources of greenhouse gases are the actual producers of fossil fuels, not the vehicles they're used in. Same goes for fossil fuel powerplants

[@rogermartinez78]

It will become like the Hunger Games if we don't change direction. The Donald wants to represent President Snow.

[@matthewburns8873]

No, obviously WE are the problem and not the poor poor investors and corporations. Thats why WE should fund solar farms and not the corporations and governments. My dirty 1.6l petrol car is polluting way way more than a jet of some poor billionaire or millionaire. /s obviously

[@Endaxess]

@matthewburns8873 Even at the end of the world governments and corporations will want fixing climate change to come out of our pockets

[@racingraptor4758]

​@@rogermartinez78as if Harris is better... One is a businessman puppet, one is a commie puppet.

[@EmeraldView]

Imagine heating an entire planet by a full 1° C. And then 2° ! It's an unbelievably massive amount of extra energy.

[@Adr1an511]

damn it sun and volcanos!

[@sthupdthoughts]

I dont blame you for your stupidity the way this date must be represented cant show how much dangerues it actually is. unless your doing a sarcasm joke ofc then i am the idiot here but still i know most people dont know just how much energy that is

[@rahko_i]

@@Adr1an511 Heh. The Sun wouldn't warm the atmosphere anything if there wasn't greenhouse gases, those are what capture the Sun's heat. Just look at Venus and Mars for examples. Also, all of the volcanoes all over the world combined cause carbon emissions as much in a whole year as humanity causes carbon emission in just three days. Yes, three (3) days, you didn't read it wrong. Earth is so volcanically dormant these days that they are not a problem for the atmosphere at all. The past extinction events in Earth's history caused by volcanic activity has been periods of hundreds of thousands of years of highly active constant volcanic eruptions. There is zero of that going on now.

[@brandonf-pn9mv]

4.2 x 10^9 cubic kilometers worth of atmosphere heated an entire degree celsius.

[@ruprecht9997]

Yes and no. Where does 99% of it come from? The sun. If none of that radiated out as heat, the planet would probably boil within weeks. CO2 captures a tiny fraction of the heat loss (long wave heat radiation) into space, nothing more. That is what has heated up our world one or two degrees. The amount of energy that hits us from the sun, now that is an unbelievable amount.

[@EmeraldGamerOriginal]

I’m horrified of the effects climate change will have on us. I just want to live my life but the past generations and the rich have ruined our chances by not doing anything

[@uncletiggermclaren7592]

I am what, objectively, would be called "rich". I have never owned a vehicle, and I don't fly, and I try not to eat food that isn't local, and I have been doing all of that for at least 35 years. 40 years ago I made a conscious choice to tread lightly on Mother Earth, and have made more than normal progress towards that. I didn't do it because of climate change, but because of the pollution that was becoming worse every day, the initial trigger was the book "The silent spring". Do you own a car?. Do you travel to take holidays ?. Do you use fossil fuels where you could use renewables instead ?. Do you heat, or cool your home?. Do you, in fact, use a computer and monitor, which are extremely energy expensive things ?. Don't excuse yourself, make changes in your OWN behaviour, and stop blaming everyone else.

[@EmeraldView]

​@@uncletiggermclaren7592 Read Overshoot by William Canton

[@mikeyo1O1]

The rich are indeed greedy, and overall harmful, yes. But I seriously doubt their plan is to destroy everything, as their wealth becomes completely useless. There is a lot more than meets the eye, in regards to climate change, and literally everything else.

[@fritzbox6764]

@@uncletiggermclaren7592 "what is privilege?"

[@uncletiggermclaren7592]

@@fritzbox6764 A semantic ploy, in this case, but in any case, a word.

[@rubydiprose8968]

guys dont worry i got this ill make sure we live

[@xtandogy1480]

How? Lol

[@ReZoTitan]

Thanks ruby 👍

[@rubydiprose8968]

@@xtandogy1480 ill come up with something on the spot

[@nonenone7761]

What I do not get, is how people do not see the other side of this issue. This is our biggest threat, but, it’s also the single largest opportunity for humanity, as well. Fixing our environment has so much money attached to it. We won’t need to worry about work, if we commit. This is the danger, and the solution, facing us, depending on how we view it.

[@mytmouse57]

Too many people still think it’s fake.

[@EmeraldView]

Why do food shortages lead to masturbation? 6:40

[@meierlinksd4996]

I had to listen to it several times to finally get what he was saying. Though, we could add, soooo .... It leads to hand-made pork? Some sizzling of the steak? A little Almond Joy? And so on. 😂

[@euroschmau]

This whole video is masturbation, seems AI generated too.

[@iGame3D]

When you're hungry and there's nothing to do, may as well wank.

[@roderickcortez138]

Because when people are hungry masturbation can take their mind off of the hunger. I masturbate whenever I'm hungry. It works quite well.

[@GS42SCHOPAWE]

Mass starvation

[@Tulenoslav]

I am a human and I met many other humans in my life, solely based on that, I say we are doomed.

[@herewegoagain404]

To everyone panicking about the "climate emergency", don't. The only thing to fear is fear itself. And if you want to do something about it support nuclear energy.

[@ethanlittle579]

This is what I tell people. In theory if we follow the relatively simple safety methods in order to reduce or negate any risks of nuclear meltdown, then nuclear is definitely the way. Something else that would be rather important is that these power plants should be government owned/ non profit. The moment that anything potentially dangerous becomes ‘for profit’ catastrophe, in some form, always seems to ensue.

[@emmetalexander5667]

Like microwaves?

[@herewegoagain404]

@@ethanlittle579 I can understand your thinking and preference for government owned but in today's times that won't work. All western governments are either corrupt and \or stupid and joined at the hip with corporations. Which btw is the definition of fascism and is exemplified by liberal governments around the world. So just like with the renewables industry public money will be misspent on stupid things to make their corporate mates rich and everybody else worse off. So I say let the private sector develop nuclear energy and let the free market decide the price. That would be way more honest than all the eco, saving the planet, anti human hypocrisy that is fed to the people now.

[@thevenomousgamer217]

@@ethanlittle579 I agree. People should be more aware of the benefits of nuclear energy as it produces more energy than any other energy sources that we use. If goverments invest more into nuclear energy and the development of nuclear fusion. We would easily reach the global climate goal. But people need to be more educated on how nuclear energy work and the difference between nuclear fission and nuclear fusion

[@enricod.7198]

The answer to the climate crisis is LESS and not more technology. Less people, less agricolture, less pesticides. The energy crisis is only one of many issues we are facing and a lot of people think that will be enough. Lol it won't. We loose topsoil every year, we loose 1% avg sperm count every year due to probably pollution which is behing rising cancer, autoimmune diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, heartstrokes etc etc. We have positive loops that CAN'T be stopped (like if a LOT of methane will come out from the seabed, nuclear energy won't matter shit). Energy is part of the equation but we already caused so much damage that even if we resolved it tomorrow, we might end up destroyed anyway. Even stopping emissions would remove about 1c of masking effect cooling. There is no escape, even with nuclear. We MIGHT get a chance with fusion as with almost unlimited energy we might even fix issues that aren't fixable today due to energy inefficiency, but I doubt it. We'll just make more stupid ai chatbots until water runs dry and there is no more food.

[@Spectrum3900]

We should focus our thoughts on things we can actually fix - food, freshwater water, and deal with trash --- then focus on industry air pollution worldwide and trains for long distance instead of planes.

[@zoidace5795]

I think humanity wont even reach that year😂😂, war is all around us, it's not mother nature that will end us but our own species🫠

[@johngaudet6316]

Not true

[@zoidace5795]

@@johngaudet6316 i do hope so

[@agilitypop6859]

We survived the “red scare” and what came after all of that. It’s possible.

[@adamromero]

At least I won't have to worry about finding a job.

[@BrianPseivaD]

Money is more important that our Earth, we deserve everything we get!

[@Andres_2004]

WHAT???

[@lukabeglarishvili2254]

So... You want the sweet cash in exchange of your lives? Ok. Your funeral :/

[@jessechristie1172]

Well what’s there way of stopping “global warming” ah yeah carbon credits taxes etc there is no crisis. Just a good money making scheme

[@iljun3089]

​@lukabeglarishvili2254 you did nit get the point. Swooshed right over huh?

[@Daisy_95341]

Wtf. ?? 💀

[@kenzboard]

adapt or die. the darwin test awaits in our future.

[@XenoRaptor-98765]

“It’s not the strongest or the smartest that’s survives it the one that’s the most adaptable to change.”

[@thefogitself]

Wow. Hopeful.

[@SentientNebula]

​@@thefogitself it's almost like constant unwavering optimism is extremely unrealistic 😱

[@BlahBlah-l4c]

He's already here. This is the mouse utopia.

[@enricod.7198]

Our future? Climate scientists already know we are the frog and we already are in the kettle with heat set to max.

[@os2171]

I’m so glad my wife and I, decided from the beginning to be Child-Free. What kind of future is that?

[@Viyan48]

It's very great brother... Enjoy life. Don't bring anyone

[@chrisswan907]

I had to relisten to 6:42 a few times before realizing what you were getting at

[@randomosugamer]

im still confusec

[@randomosugamer]

Oh mass starvation youtube subtitles showed the other thing

[@VPB1970]

Same

[@unwisely]

I was like "excuse me? What masturba***n what?"

[@sobolanul82]

2C is in sight earlier than that. Wait for the next ElNino.

[@sedonars1]

We are already at 1.51c above pre industrial for the past 13 months (Copernicus). The GHGs in the atmosphere already will add another 1c over the next 10 years. GHGs are being increased by the largest incremental margins EVER. This would indicate we need to be at 0 emissions starting tomorrow; if we do that, the lack of aerosol masking will raise the temp by 1c within 90 days (thus 2.51c above). Anyone with any awareness at all knows that the "window of opportunity" to solve this problem was 1989-1994. WE ALL CHOSE NOT TO SOLVE! So, we are now in a predicament where the ONLY choice is Business As Usual = Near Term Mass Extinction, e.g. Humans erased from the planet by 2050 (but greatly reduced every year from now until then). Thanks FF Industry CEO psychopaths; you sacrificed everything to the altar of $$$!

[@Toastcat890]

Well humans had a nice run the planet will be very thankful once we're gone

[@Trahzy]

But the planet already went through extreme climate change on its own way before we existed, many times. The climate changes.

[@racingraptor4758]

As if climate doesn't change naturally. Polution is other thing but that's mostly a fault of those fat stupid suits in their mansions.

[@wormyfoods]

I think what people don't understand is that the rich and powerful don't care because they won't be alive to reap the consequences. A lot of of those who control big companies are not going to be around for this stuff. That penalty will fall to our children and future generations to come.

[@irestone1]

sooo solar slice is not a sponsor...?

[@pbkobold]

lol yep. Talk about greenwashing too. Solar is nifty but silicon refining for panels is incredibly energy intensive.

[@rahko_i]

@@pbkobold Yeah, that was maybe not the best timing. Like, yeah, I get that these videos and youtubers in general need sponsors, but honestly, videos like these would be better done pro bono, because sponsors like this really just kind of cancels the message of the video.

[@bluegiant13]

​@@rahko_ii don't see how. I just see it as him earning his bread and ignore the sponsors words

[@justadildeau]

​@bluegiant13 you think propaganda is delicious 😋

[@jamesatkinson5728]

As a child of a farmer this is very vital to our sector as agriculture will stop!

[@zalezluciano2899]

These always remind me of George Carlins skit about the planet not going anywhere

[@gymclasshero88]

Link?

[@JuliePikacheeks]

The Earth has always gone through climate changes, all we are doing is speeding up the process. It killed off species that couldn’t adapt, but if we can dial this change back to be slower, there will be more time to at least adapt as a species (not genetically like evolution, but adapt society)

[@GanjaClaus]

Strange how many people do not realize, that we are living at the end of an ice age. No matter what we do, the polar caps will definitely melt down completely as they always did after an ice age.

[@iWrInstincts]

dont bother. People like this just know to scream wolf. Its been “the end of the world” for the last year for the last 24 years.

[@No_moral_to_the_story]

We are not "living at the end of an ice age" the ice age ended 12,000 years ago. This ice age myth was created by a climate skeptic think tank funded in large part by the fossil fuel industry. But you're free to believe whatever makes you happy, and if you want to believe its all just a natural cycle then go for it, but just know that view is not backed up by any science.

[@iGame3D]

Because we have accelerated to a point where things will wipe out our civilization centuries in advance of when it would have been a problem, before we have time to adapt to the changes.

[@Fireneedsair]

@@iWrInstincts denial is a uniquely human and UGLY trait genuis

[@iWrInstincts]

@@iGame3D ok al gore

[@dannya8614]

I'm 54 years old being busy in various IT jobs for the past 35 years, each one of those jobs slowly kills me. But it matters not. I have embraced nihilism in the end. We're standing on the edge in awe.

[@donhoverson6348]

Not really standing on the edge as sprinting towards it.

[@sedonars1]

@@donhoverson6348 We are actually falling off the cliff as we speak. It just takes a few years to get to the bottom. Meanwhile, we are told, and think, that we are levitating like Wiley Coyote in thin air! Even ACME can't save us now.

[@donhoverson6348]

@@sedonars1 Helene will not come alone.

[@mytmouse57]

Sheesh, Dude, your life sounds like the lyrics to a Smiths song.

[@leDevLV]

brother, make the next video on how batteries are made... and whats the impact of them in EVs in the end

[@train-station-2693]

Bro why are u such a bot yeah we get it ev are bad but like we need to solve everything most important first

[@justadildeau]

t@train-station-2693 OK bot boy we get it, you want the ostrich method of sticking your head in the sand

[@Davinagoddess]

Im 27 now and I’ve known about our impending doom since i was a kid, I would sit and watch things like this on tv , it’s been too late for some time now.

[@healthyminds9279]

As a non-culturally tribal conservative, I feel like I don't agree with ANYBODY about global warming. It's such a lonely feeling. I can't stand how Democrats just pretend they care with virtue signalling policy ideas. I can't stand how Republicans always think of every possible excuse not to care about global warming. Seemingly nobody in any cultural tribe or party is willing to admit the inconvenient truth: The only surefire way to beat global warming is an Earth-wide treaty. One superpower country can't just majorly hault fossil fuels because then they will economically fall way behind other countries. We simply can't let countries with bad ethics like China and Russia have a de-facto takeover of the world. If one country "stops" having fossil fuel factories, it's just gonna buy more goods from China, economically funding pollution. Therefore, every country must "stop" fossil fuel usage at the same time. We need something like the Geneva Convention but for climate. If we all suffer in the short term for it, then knowing we aren't falling behind other countries will be the difference in us pulling through. If Earth was all in it together... Anyways, solid video; i left a like. But not mentioning nuclear energy at all makes it seem quite left biased.

[@frostydei5012]

Solidarity💚🩵. I agree 100%. The thing that infuriates me the most is how class is never acknowledged during climate discussions. It is so disingenuous. They act like poverty and suffering are an act of God and we have no agency whatsoever. They Never talk about the most crucial statistics which must be addressed to save this world- (including the species we haven't driven to extinction already.) So, I'm going to start saying what our PMC refuses to say. Nearly all carbon expenditures can be traced directly to the decadence, rapacity, and unaccountability of the wealthiest 10%. The private jets. Cruises. Yachts. The factory farms. War profiteers. PFAS. Carbon intensive international supply chains that make no practical sense if you remove the profit motive, etc. The examples are literally infinite. Rainforests are decimated to further enrich already wealthy people. Regulatory and judicial capture, which shields predatory industries from consequences and curtails environmental policy. It's insane to me that nobody is suggesting the obvious remedy. Take. The Wealth. Away. The grotesque accumulation of capital hoarded by plutocrats at the top is what grants them power and influence. Take it away from them. They've proven themselves to be a unique, global hazard. Every living creature on this earth is facing extinction because the parasitic ruling class is wildly selfish and dangerously incompetent. They cannot be reasoned with. They'll happily torch billions of people if it shaves one nickel off their taxes.

[@healthyminds9279]

@@frostydei5012 I love the independent mindset! I'd need to research your specific claims to have a definitive opinion on them. But you're totally right that politics always ignores addressing the direct sources of global warming.

[@kichidino2599]

I remember during COVID time in lock down, the earth was actually slowly to heal too.. but ever since lockdown was over.. it gotten worst now

[@kichidino2599]

It always been getting hotter each year in summer too, especially in Canada too

[@kichidino2599]

I also really loved this video too.. glad it came to me

[@peachwhite-333]

I thought I was the only one who noticed so. People claim it wasn't so. But it clearly was. The air felt a lot better and cleaner, spring was beautyful and had so much more life.

[@falaplazmy]

Changes requires money. There are many poor nations and people - they can't afford new technologies. It's to late for change...

[@ruprecht9997]

Capitalism is the problem yes. Nobody cares about the global problems and their solutions, unless they can exploit some poor people or countries. So it comes down to doing low tech stuff, that individuals pilot, not waiting for conservative capitalists.

[@moalston4203]

true like the effect of Chernobyl just goes to show and the plastics with 500 years to break down the forever chemicals

[@stephanietitarenko3252]

"Change requires money". Right now, maybe. But we can fix that, if we really want to, by changing our economic system. Sadly it's easier for me to picture the end of the world than the end of capitalism ( at least in the monstrous form it is currently in ).

[@sarkarinaukar9658]

over the years, particularly the last decade, i on a personal level noticed the declining population of bees flies birds around me, i live in a not so deforestation affected area, so seeing this was a big surprise.. realising these things is slowly but surely sending me into depression.. the world is surely gonna change soon for better or worse

[@someone7068]

I use to fear the end of the world,now i beg for it

[@livetotell100]

2035? When I was in High School, late 80' early 90's, we were told 2010. Then it was 2020, now it's 2035? This is why people don't believe it. Everything, and I mean EVEYTHING you just stated was told to me when I was 17 years old. And I'm 50 now.

[@ruprecht9997]

I agree. The problem isn't tipping points, of which there are countless, but consequences going forward, and realistic plans for what can be done, short and long term. I have the same experience as you, that the goal posts are continously moving (I'm 58). Probably climate scientists decide its better to pretend there is something that can still be done, which is a hard sell if the crucial tipping points were pre 2010 🙂

[@akmon3490]

The problem was that climate change developed a market of it's own that isn't interested in nuclear power and would rather have solar farms that occupy a magnitude of scale more landmass to produce the same power , which means more carbon to create and maintain the solar farm and let's not forget the lifetime of the panels.

[@Dlweta57]

You've been feed a lot of lies

[@Dlweta57]

@@ruprecht9997 nothing can be done.. The pole shift is coming and it'll be a near extinction level event, so prey to woteva god you believe in as it will be Armageddon...

[@barneyatkinson-saul9881]

I think that technological advancements, scientific understanding, and successful initiatives to prevent climate change in the last 50 years have probably resulted in estimations and predictions being revisited.

[@benmcreynolds8581]

It's a shame how much Fear Mongering has negatively impacted progress of Nuclear energy. (I'd almost assume oil companies are be very happy about this?) At this point tho Modern nuclear energy should be one of the main things we are utilizing in collaboration with other alternative energy sources across the world. This power source is the best option to improve our environment & will really help lower our emissions. The only things holding us back is legislation, fear mongering & past trauma that's affected us from our past (which is understandable but we really gotta give it a chance to see if it can prove it has progressed & improved) The more i learn about our power grid, the more i realize that modern nuclear energy options are our best option. Small form reactors, LFTRs, Thorium Reactors, molten salt reactors. Utilizing our advanced technology, Improved engineering & material science. Utilizing our greater understanding of safety & well made designs. We have so much more advanced computer technology & robotics that can be used. It feels like even tho tons of advancement has occurred with engineering designs, safety measures, etc. It still doesn't matter to most people. It's like most people are ingrained with a natural negative response when talking about nuclear energy. It's a bummer because i truly believe that our best option for our future is to start utilizing Modern advanced nuclear energy options in our electrical grid. It's just proving to be challenging to get politicians to get on board. It will really allow places to be much more energy independent. Less reliant on fossil fuels. They'll have efficient, stable electrical grids and the rest of the grid could experiment with alternative power sources, power desalination plants, etc. We need to heal from the trauma of our past. See & learn that those things only happened solely from Us not understanding what we were doing when it came to nuclear energy at the time. We didn't have advanced enough technology, material science, engineering, safety measures, understanding of how to go about everything, etc. This source of energy will greatly help the world improve towards the future and lowering emissions. More than anything else could, while also providing a very stable electrical grid system. Currently we have alternative energy options but the majority of our grid is powered off of fossil fuels and emission producing sources of energy. We will be so much better going forward commiting to modern advanced nuclear energy options. Did they outlaw electricity or oil, coal when things went wrong in the early days of those fields? No! They kept going and understood things usually are bumpy and difficult in the beginning and kept going even tho those sources negatively impacted our environment. A huge issue is government BLOCKING any sort of progression from happening. We'd be lucky to see the slightest projects approved or finished with-in the next 100 years.. It's very annoying to see how much we have gotten in our own way when it comes to improving or advancing certain things. Instead we let fear, money, man made "required legal processes" Stop us from doing anything other than wind, solar, oil, natural gas, damming our rivers, mining for minerals... It's very frustrating because we should be able to use all these options in collaboration. If we actually wanted to improve anything. That's what we need to do and stop letting so much potential get blocked from ever occurring in the first place.. It's really irritating. I wish certain people didn't make this so "complicated and difficult" Why would any reasonable person want to block progression? In my opinion it's been irritating that our society has taken this "it's up to each individual person to make a difference" approach. When that just plays off of people's emotions. This issue is so much bigger than individual people. We need countries/states to get on board. It's the only way we can make even the Slightest difference. We've already waited too long. Everyday is a day wasted & we haven't even made a dent in improving our situation.

[@sulawesi-steve]

I agree with you, only thing I think we aren't taking very seriously is the waste. What do with do with it all?? In 3 to 400 years (if everything went to nuclear) there would be a lot of semi hazardous that we don't really have anything to do with....yet. storage is kinda too long an risky. Can't send it to space because A it's silly and B could go bang on the way out. An we haven't really got a recycle/reuse option. I deffo think nuclear along with stored hydro an solar is the way we should be going, but the waste is more a concern to me than the power plant going bang. One is guaranteed and one is pretty rare.

[@train-station-2693]

Nuclear energy is on the best sources of energy

[@rahko_i]

While I agree that nuclear energy is good (definitely better than fossil fuels) and could be used to phase out fossil fuels, it still won't solve the main issue that is the consumption in general. We should be cutting all our energy consumption, and after that, solar, wind, and hydro would be perfectly enough. Once we cut our consumption, nuclear will kind of become obsolete anyway. Also, there are still issues with nuclear as well; it's expensive because of the safety measures, and the mining of uranium causes a lot of problems. SMR's are looking more and more just another gimmick to try to make nuclear hip again. The fact is, with scale comes efficiency, and in truth, nuclear really only makes sense in large scale.

[@nicholasj5798]

@@rahko_i The advancement of the human race as a species and into a technologically more advanced civilization requires higher energy consumption. This capability to generate and output such higher amounts of energy is why the Kardashev scale makes sense.. We should constantly be striving to increase energy output with the most efficient methods. We are currently limited to nuclear fission but with higher energy outputs, there is good evidence to indicate that we can accelerate our path towards nuclear fusion. This should be the main goal of humanity, almost limitless energy.

[@rahko_i]

@@nicholasj5798 On the long run, yes, but the societal change needs to come before the technology can come. This economic and societal system is the true obstacle for us to become a higher level civilization, not the technology. Star Trek's Replicator is a great example of this: people often credit the Star Trek's socialist utopian society to the Replicator, that it wouldn't be possible without it, but in reality it's precisely the opposite: the utopian society has to come first, or else the Replicator would just enhance the power structures our current societal system already has. Just imagine if Elon Musk or Jeff Bezos now invented the Replicator; they would just use it to gain even more immense amounts of money and power and we would be headed towards Dune, not Star Trek.

[@FellSlammed]

It's over. It was nice while things lasted. I love you all

[@kaister901]

6:42 The captions are wild lol. "Food shortages will often lead to masturbation" Say what? 💀

[@morgandevries15]

Hahahah I saw that

[@valentinpavlov8082]

😂

[@johngaudet6316]

My fridge and pantry must be empty then. 😂

[@pastorofmuppets9346]

Youre not you when youre hungry

[@juostudios6216]

everything leads to masturbation in the end

[@isbestlizard]

Think of how much profit there is to make from climate disaster

[@MissAynneK]

That’s yet another problem people will have to battle 😭😭😭

[@KevinVeroneau]

Capitalism is the best thing humanity ever invented.

[@ruprecht9997]

@@KevinVeroneau And worst. It has allowed population growth and created riches, and technology, but today it is eating its way into governments, working against the common good, and needs to be limited.

[@sedonars1]

@@KevinVeroneau Maybe, but we are experiencing VULTURE Capitalism, not Capitlaism. Unregulated, Capitalism is merely Hyper Feudalism!

[@burnoutminion]

My community is urging the government to cut down those big trees near the roads and highways. With the more frequent extreme storms it's actually more dangerous to keep the big trees in the city. But the government is not listening.

[@soy_red]

we need our old trees!

[@jonathanclemmer8971]

On 10/27, my region experienced 19" of rain in 8 hrs. The deviation, loss of life, economic impact, etc has never occurred here previously. One month later Spain received 19" of rain in 8 hrs...loss of life, devastation, cost is even higher. At 57 years old, I now realize that I have failed my children - now grown and starting families of their own but can't afford a car or a house ... No American dream remains, so maybe reality is the dream we all need to receive...cause and effect.

[@oliverolover]

If you're driving a car at 60 mph towards a cliff, the point of no return isn't the cliff edge, it's the spot on the road where even if you apply the brakes you won't be able to stop before leaving the highway into the abyss. We are already past the point where we can stop this car.

[@YouTubeSucks-tg2gr]

Says you.. a common idiot

[@wolffy42]

I have this nagging feeling we've passed all these thresholds b4. Ever since the late 80s early 90s, I've heard these estimates, and it's always 2 degs in the next 10 to 15 years. Well, it's been 35 years, and we've blown past multiple deadlines since then and the numbers just keep getting rolled back. So by now, I think we've already passed the point of no return, and this is all fear mongering to try and not make it even worse than what it already will be.

[@canxel11]

The way I see the world is that it needs a hard reset

[@Juan_van_Eeden977]

WEF GREAT RESET AGENDA 2030.Own nothing and be happy.

[@ruprecht9997]

No it needs to be maintained by us. We have long since taken over control of the ecosystems. A hard reset is only a nice way of saying mass extinction of humans. That can't be what we desire, right?

[@MSHNKTRL]

3:00 impending doom for humanity? just produce more things that require despoiling the environment and fuel more industry; then have a pretty app with random numbers that assure us that we are the good guys doing good things. Totally not sponsored, just affiliated.

[@nonickels8975]

Hi. I'm here for the nihilistic frenzy.

[@ApertureThinking]

Ha

[@justadildeau]

You're late, al gore's predictions are 20 years old.

[@UnicornPlantMonster]

I love your videos. We need awareness more than anything right now and you make your videos really well 🙏

[@BeastNugget44Main]

Watched a documentary about how much wildlife and nature mankind has killed due to this and its actually insane especially the ocean life

[@l.v.k9000]

In 2000 ppl talked to me about the millenium bug , weird thing is ...to me thats also when the decline in many things became so visual and all started to change so rapid , i do believe its going towards an end , but only for a new beginning .

[@urssaf343]

Sure, right after all the billionaires, millionaires, politicians and celebs.

[@brettcrawford8878]

Some years ago I was on a cruise ship that went to the equator area of the planet. Walked outside of the ship onto the deck to see what it was like. It was pretty much like walking into an oven. I turned around after a short time to go back into the air-conditioning of the cool air.The fish in the ocean (a lot of them anyway) are moving north and south to get away from the heat so that they are not killed by the heat in the water they live in. What helps slightly is planting more trees 🌳 to help soak up carbondioxide in the air. Which helps to clean the air and possibly gives a product to be used in the future in some areas. Planting trees also helps to prevent some areas turning drier and possibly into deserts. Also if trees that grow fruit are planted in enough areas there is the possibility they might be used at a future date should things stuff up in a bad way in the future. If you can not plant trees that grow food it is possibly less of a problem for me than it is for you if I am lucky. Have a good day 😊.

[@Badash25203]

The funny part about this is, first, solar power energy won’t do crap. Look, first, solar farms need to destroy many forests, and for all that deforestation, we get not even half of what we need in energy. And wind power, also the same thing, it won’t give us enough energy, and it will cause deforestation. The wind blades aren’t recyclable, so that will cause landfills of wind blades. What we need is nuclear energy. It produces the same amount of CO2 as solar power, close to zero, and they produce more energy. So, we need nuclear energy, not solar power or wind power.

[@austintrousdale2397]

Although I agree that nuclear power needs to be a greater priority as a lower-carbon energy solution, I don’t share your contention that more forest must necessarily be razed to supply solar farms. What about the possibility of siting some of them in former industrial sites in decaying urban settings?

[@Badash25203]

@@austintrousdale2397 yes that could be a possibility but solar gives us a very small amount of energy. To get anything good we need hundreds of solar panels

[@Aatell764]

Nuclear energy is the future. The only reason people are scared of it is because of propaganda that was pushed by big coal. Yes there have been incidents but if you had any idea how many horrific accidents much worse then any nuclear incident that has happened because of coal you'd feel a lot different about it. Incidents that are caused by coal aren't nearly as publicized, and that's simply because as of right now we are almost entirely dependent on it. To put something in perspective, the smoke from a coal powerplant is filled with thousands of toxic chemicals. A coal powerplant, just in the smoke it produces in a single day, is as much radiation that can come from a nuclear plant in an entire year.

[@jamjam7026]

Put solar plants in desert areas and wind farms in oceans, create more hydro electric generating facilities and yes, nuclear all the way, hopefully someday soon we will have nuclear fusion, that will provide more energy than we could ever want or need. For awhile at least

[@Badash25203]

@@jamjam7026 ya they should make solar farms in deserts and wind farms in Ocean which will make it produce more energy, but they haven't the governments are really slow to do anything

[@stoicwalk]

We can all talk about these big corporations causing this but you are the consumer. Are you consuming less? Travelling less, buying less, eating less. No i bet.

[@mikedelgrande5296]

I’ve been playing too much Elden Ring. I thought this was an ER lore video and the thumbnail was the Flame of Ruin eye on the Fire Giants chest.

[@Simonadas04]

point of no return in 2035! 2035 arrives: nothing has changed point of no return in 2045! 2045 arrives: nothing has changed and so on

[@keyahsblair]

If coastlines are in jeopardy why are rich ppl building on them still?

[@salomaogomes7311]

Climate change is the quintessential proof that rich people aren't inteligent. They're just that, rich.

[@toppedtop5787]

Bruh, like they care they can afford to relocate when things go south can the average person? The goverment will probably pay for it too, since they ahve insurance on all thsoe properites

[@maheshkanojiya4858]

After a decade or so may be they won't

[@faarsight]

Try getting insurance for a coastal property

[@toppedtop5787]

@@faarsight as a multi millionaire billionare trying to aviod tax or as a regular joe?

[@AnonymousCaveman]

Its the mode pf production we are also in. Endless growth on a finite planet.

[@poornimar1145]

11 years?? Dang. . . . thats too much. Make it 5

[@Viyan48]

Make it tomorrow I'm ready

[@samuelreusch004]

It was all In all a really good summary. The only thing that I'm not agreeing on is the fact that we don't want to be under 2°C, we want to be at 1,5° or well below 2° above pre-industrial climate(according to the Paris agreement).

[@iGame3D]

We've passed 1.5C and greenhouse gas emissions have increased year over year.

[@MrStark-up6fi]

We are all fucked, no one wants to give up their car in favor of walking, cycling or public transport. Nice knowing you all

[@Trahzy]

Because some of us need a car to get around where we live.

[@ResidentofYT]

Yeah like the guy said above me it would take way too long to get around which is another issue

[@skycladsquirrel]

One thing you forgot to mention is nuclear power. New GEN-IV reactors can replace coal plants and use the existing infrastructure. And some of them are modular reactors that can be shipped on a truck and power a 1000 homes for five years before refueling. Also Solid State Fusion is also in the works. All of these have zero emissions. Waste isn't an issue with them, and some can reuse old nuclear waste and recycle it. Ai technologies are going to change the world also in regards to super efficiency in the grid and manufacturing of of newer energy technologies. It is mandatory that are electrical grid has a major overhaul ASAP. Looks a Texas, one hurricane has knocked out power for over 2 million people. Hospitals are on generator backups. The future I would love to see is if we had installable batteries in homes that could power a home for 10-30 years and it could be easily swapped out for the new one once exhausted. No more power grid. The energy companies would just manufacture the batteries and maintain their clients.

[@barking_mad6649]

We're f#cked. 😢

[@matthewboire6843]

Well let’s see what happens in 2035

[@blueskies1237]

Sooo fucked

[@Hitherto90]

We were fucked from day one I'm sorry to say.

[@themelancholyofgay3543]

6:38 were my ears broken, cause i definitely heard something, even cc agrees

[@Ms.Divine2024]

Um yeah

[@mihaja87]

"Mass starvation" 😅

[@michaelweston409]

6:40 food shortages will likely lead to masturbation 😂

[@tonyblack4833]

one thing we definitely need to do is use more solar panels wind Mills and generators and them more common and make it standard and replace gas for homesteads gas oil coal illegal regardless if people don't like it if anything gas/propane should only be used for cooking and bathing that's it

[@LyraEnchanted]

I think the reason why we as society have trouble with coming up with a solution to fix all of this is that there isnf just one way to do so, theyre so many factors and we like leaders to guide us

[@LyraEnchanted]

And the people who are supposed to be our leaders are being paid by the same corporations who are ruining our planet :/

[@plaquedoctor-g4k]

our leaders. all payed off

[@EmeraldGamerOriginal]

We need to take action ourselves. Those powerful enough to make changes. (Governments and corporations) care too much about money

[@meatcandlepoeple5126]

We wouldn't be in this situation if we have never created agriculture.

[@sedonars1]

True; but the Holocene was so tempting to evolution to create just the right species to take full advantage: Homo Idioticus. We will be the last branch of Homo to tread the earth, and just smart enough to take everything else down with us! Possibly more spectacular in it's insidiousness, than a dumb asteroid the size of Manhattan!

[@junecontreras6896]

Clean energy isn’t as clean as you claim it to be. Look up “disposing of solar windmills” Look up “disposing of solar panels” While we are at it, why don’t you look up how lithium batteries are made. Either way you look at it, it’s going to get rough in less than a decade, I just hope we find a real solution, whatever it may be. 🙏🏾

[@bakedbean37]

"solar windmills" What are they? Turbines driven by solar winds? That's far out man.

[@itzpogboy]

Let's be real there's now nothing we can do about it, so I say bring it on...

[@Kolesha]

They also said the same about 2012 and other previous years. I'm 99% 2035 will just be a regular year. Worst case scenario we might have another pandemic (that was created in a lab), but that will be it.

[@sandshark2]

Because they said the same in 2012, regulations and bans were passed to limit further pollution, pushing the end back years, to 2035/2040

[@Kolesha]

@@sandshark2 But these regulations and bans were barely upheld by the world though. So that's not the reason. The truth is none of us knows when "the end" or "global catastrophe" will occur. It might very well be next year, it doesn't have to be 2035. We should definitely take better care of our world. But I think setting dates for when we will face a point of absolute catastrophe, might be the very reason why we don't work on improvement now. Why should we, if we keep saying to ourselves that disaster won't happen tomorrow but in an x amount of years?

[@sandshark2]

@@Kolesha yeah, why else do you think the tipping point was pushed only years ahead, instead of decades? Because regulations meant to solve the problem werent followed and instead kicked the can down the road. Dates for this stuff was calculated via predictive modelling based on current trends in greenhouse gas levels and economic conditions. These arent made up, theyre years that are predicted to be when so little has been done that we fall off the cliff and nature cannot be reverted. Additionally, dates are EXTREMELY important for organizing further regulation, prosecution, and organizing around climate change. Why? Because thats how all projects function at an international scale down to basic group projects. In school do you think anyone would do their work if the teacher said “heres the final project, its due at some point, idk when, but do it anyways :)”? Confusion would occur, people would get angry over needing a schedule to do the project. Nothing would get done because no one organizes themselves. This is the state of large-scale teamwork. You jump to conclusions way too easily, without knowing even the basics of societal functioning and yet you play off this wishy-washy “do it sometime” without any plan to get anything actually done. I wish our politicians didnt agree with you, since your attitude is the exact same one that politicians have that leads them to take oil baron bribes.

[@Kolesha]

@@sandshark2 Uh, no. Our politicians agree with you, not with me. They look at the charts and see that they have many years ahead before stuff *MIGHT* get real messed up. Whereas I say that we should live, expecting that tomorrow may very well be 'the end' or 'global catastrophe', however you want to call it. If they thought like me, they'd have solved this issue ages ago. Maybe, read carefully what I'm writing instead of writing entire essay based on a misunderstanding lol.

[@sandshark2]

@@Kolesha people who live expecting tomorrow to be the end of the world value only immediate profit gain. If the world ends tomorrow, why bother changing or trying to fight it? Just make another million $ and spend it on frivolous amusements before tomorrow! Living requires living for the future. Without a set date, nothing gets done. If you want millions of government workers, officials, and companies to organize in fixing this international issue, you need a deadline. Simple as fuck. Im sorry but aspirational quotes that work on a personal level are a death sentence to organizational function. Thats why the cancer of hyper individualism has helped lead us to this point. Companies seek immediate profit because theyve already accepted the world ending like you have. What we must do is show that we still have the time and resources to prevent the end of the world. Lying to yourself that it will end tomorrow is no different than giving up and laying on your back for death after wasting away a day on unimportant distractions. Thank god Im an absurdist

[@MagnumInnominandum]

Your presumption is that there is anything constructive that might be done before then. What you don't know doesn't dull your optimism.

[@GustavoRey-oo6zi]

Nice COMMERCIAL for Solar Slice.

[@psikeyhackr6914]

So where do climate scientists talk about the CO2 resulting from unnecessary manufacturing due to Planned Obsolescence?

[@ruprecht9997]

They can't criticize capitalism without losing standing in the scientific world. Unfortunately.

[@JR954]

Why does no one talk about the food we consume to help upright us during this tumble. We have total control of what we eat. I can’t force Exxon Mobile to stop the greed.

[@francobrown4409]

It is what it is!

[@KingBritish]

Typical of you to accept defeat.

[@francobrown4409]

@@KingBritish stay cool and hydrated 🌞🥵

[@lelandhud4089]

The end of humanity is going to have top of the line commercials . Recording all fast food commercials on beta for post grid shutdown, as we speak.for solar electricity veiwing.

[@67MisterImango]

I've been watching your videos since 2021... keep up the good work 👏 🙌

[@ellingeidbo8469]

You guys keep fighting the oil and beef and plastic industry at the same time. Im working on surviving. Sorry. I dont have enough money left to worry about my carbon footprint.

[@franki3Ru550]

I dont know about you people but life is extremely short.. enjoy life and dont let people scare you or worry you for no reason.. People will always say the world is going to end, extremely annoying

[@al22st]

Interesting video that reinforce the facts already known. I meet a man last year on a trip who is heavily implied in a project that makes carbon credits more useful to combating climate change. Basically making them more efficient in tracking them. The problem is carbon zero is a pipedream in itself, as long as there is a profit driven economy behind it. The only way to implement a tangible solution to this crisis is by completely stopping the global economy or make the transition to green energy simultaneously on every level of society, economy, etc by force at the same time without sparing no one - and it's impossible.

[@morgangrant5180]

The Western world is facing population decline.. it's being offset with migration.. people living in areas that are affected by climate change will just migrate.. there's plenty of space. Agriculture will shift.. farmers will go bankrupt.. other places previously unfit for agriculture will become prime for it as the climate changes and moisture patterns shift. I used to be a bit of a doomer.. I don't think we'll stop climate change from going over the 1.5 degree target.. I just think we're extremely adaptable.. I mean there's people living in hurricane paths, deserts, fault lines, Ohio etc.. I think we're going to make it friends.. :)

[@monke2303]

you are someone that get's it. the world is ever changing and we wil just adapt. just like every form off life has done for the past 3 billion years

[@mikeyo1O1]

Ohio, lol.

[@donhoverson6348]

The growing belts might shift northward but that does not mean that the necessary soil will be there for those crops.

[@subschnee4573]

People are extremly fit to adapt to old patterns we know aren't acceptable on how to treat other people. So this migration will lead us into a certain kind of regimes and wars.

[@denmark23]

Just a little note, the golf stream is not gonna collabs, the stream they are talking about is called Amoc, Amoc and the golfstream overlap and for this reason they are often confused. 😊

[@sahilx4954]

I was expecting AI after reading the title.

[@KingBritish]

No AI on this legendary channel.

[@sahilx4954]

​@KingBritish The last video on AI was 3 months ago. The channel won't be legendary if AI is not covered.

[@youtubeur]

@@sahilx4954 ai takes up way too much energy and materials to be built and run, i don't think we'll have it for a long time

[@sahilx4954]

@youtubeur I think you are not up to date with what AI is capable of today and what it'll be in the future. Yes, it does take a lot of energy, but output is also a lot.

[@keithjohnson1830]

We will be here in 10 years. Cut it out.

[@HamSandwich277]

"What's happening with that climate catastrophe, Charlie?" "Eleven years Turkish." "Eleven years? It was ten years five years ago!" 😂

[@poonoi1968]

good one

[@SchwabGames2014]

When the world ends, I will smile with glee, laugh with joy, and sigh in relief

[@wafity]

same bro

[@Dan5482]

The name of the Beast is CAPITALISM.

[@ApertureThinking]

facts

[@traiascacodreanu4553]

​@@ApertureThinkingSo whats the alternative? Communism?

[@moustachio05]

​@@traiascacodreanu4553 the solution is a sociocratic and democratic worker ownership of the means of production and distribution which is in short Socialism

[@traiascacodreanu4553]

@@moustachio05 Lmfao.

[@paulocruz1544]

It's called seasons.

[@ironicinorironic.]

It reminds me of that funny feeling by Bo Burnham