#22 Jayadratha-Vadha & Astronomy evidence. 14th day of the Mahabharata War (29 Oct 5561 BCE)

[@revantha3675]

I'm a Christian myself who believes in the concept of Trinity where people are debating over calvinism and arminianism. But your research has opening my thoughts Mr Nilesh Sir. I have always been a rational person and always intrigued by our past and the precise texts about wars and various technologies inscribed in the vedas long time ago, which only shows the roots of India expands to a larger part. Thank you so much for the enlightenment sir. It's true pleasure to hear these research you have done and the solid evidence you provide and give your valuable time to explain it with such explicit nature. Please keep going. You are not less than Graham Hancock, in-fact he should take few factors from your end and do a collaborative work. Thank you again.

[@NileshOak]

@@revantha3675 🙏🙏

[@abhisheksdave]

|| प्रज्ञानम् ब्रह्म || We can know god by Gyana Perfectly suits you!

[@NileshOak]

🙏🙏

[@DALIT-INFIDEL-HINDUTVA]

Thanks for the celebration of the youngest and greatest warrior Abhimanyu's 7.5 k (14k)th Punyathithi anniversary (Death Anniversary) on 29 October! Abhimanyu, son of Arjuna and Subhadra and grandson of Indra, was a great warrior who defeated many Rathis and Maharathis in the Mahabharata War. Abhimanyu gained knowledge while he was still in Subhadra’s womb. He heard Arjuna telling Subhadra the secrets of entering, exiting, and destroying various battle formations. He married Princess Uttara, daughter of King Virata of Matsya kingdom. He defeated great warriors like Drona, Kripa, Ashwatthama, Duryodhana, Salya, Dussasana, Bhurisrava etc. prominent heroes and waskilled in Mahabharat war by many Kaurava warriors including Karna, Duryodhana, etc. when he was weapon-less. At this time. his son Parikshit was in the womb of Uttara, and became the emporer of Kaurava/Pandava empire. हत्वा दशसहस्राणि कौसल्यं च महारथम्। कृष्णार्जुनसमः कार्ष्णिः शक्रलोकं गतो ध्रुवम्।। इति श्रीमन्महाभारते द्रोणपर्वणि अभिमन्युवधपर्वणि त्रयोदशदिवसयुद्धे एकोनपञ्चाशत्तमोऽध्यायः|

[@5thdworld]

Brilliant. Knowledge about 7 planets in our ancient itihasa, with 3 solid scientific proofs through translating Sanskrit verses. Simply awesome. Thanks for this Knowledge.... Jayadratha vadh story that we heard in the childhood is a myth.

[@TheSherKhhan]

Awesome Work Nilesh!! Objective, Sincere & Scientific effort

[@NileshOak]

🙏🙏

[@vinayaksavarkar7800]

Dr Padmakar Vishnu Vartak-The Divine Soul.......

[@amitdixit2362]

🙏🕉️ हर हर महादेव 🕉️🙏

[@whatis_asis]

Thank you for the video.

[@arvindbedekar7237]

अरविंद बेडेकर. मस्तच , धन्यवाद,

[@bhavanashinde4216]

खूप खूप आभार

[@sneha.8ukandam]

The accuracy they got was because of, there was no light polution 🙏 at that time

[@Goosebear77]

Wow. People really don't understand that if the East is to your Left and the West is to your right, then you are facing South? Or have I completely misunderstood what Mr Oak said about his critics?

[@finishgoogl7960]

what is krishna's yogmaya than can hide sun ? is it not true that jaydrath came in front of arjuna himself thinking that day is over ??

[@Atul.Kumar.Kuthiala]

Namaskar The idea of the third solar eclipse emanated from an article by Dr. S Balakrishna, misinterpreted by many scholars. He worked with 13-day twin eclipses to find a probable date of the MB war. He writes: "Further, during the war Jayadhrata was killed during evening of 13th day of war in an evening dark episode, on a clear day, which may have been a short solar eclipse occurring and concluding before sunset." Although in his analysis he states: "However, no eclipse was found in December period, before the winter solstice or uttara ayana."

[@NileshOak]

1. The idea of 3rd eclipse could be due to him yet borrowed and repeated by Achar with no Mahabharata evidence whatsoever. Jayadratha was killed on the 14th day evening. It was the day of full moon.

[@Atul.Kumar.Kuthiala]

@@NileshOak ji 🙏

[@aparnasengupta2691]

🙏

[@ssghugare]

Awesome Nilesh ji. एकच गोष्ट सांगा की व्यासांचं महाभारत कुठे मिळेल? कोणत्या institution ची वाचणं योग्य. कशी विकत घेईल काही माहिती देऊ शकाल.

[@NileshOak]

Gita press 6 volumes with Hindi translation, download for free in PDF from archive.org

[@ssghugare]

@@NileshOak Thank you

[@finishgoogl7960]

what were uranus, neptune, pluto known as, or called in the days of mahabharata ?? if not named yet, how can they be included in the count of "sapt grah" ???

[@NileshOak]

What planets do you suggest ...as seen and in the. Company of sun (7 of them), going away from the Sun or attacking the moon after sunset?

[@finishgoogl7960]

​@@NileshOak (A) Thanks for being polite & not angry. When a vratt is being told in katha form, metaphors, rupaks, slangs come in. Thus, 18 akshaohini army does not rule out the possibility of +1 more or -1 less in the army. Smilarly, whole army would not mean exact 100% count of the army. Therefore my simple inquisitiveness, for your kind consideration is 4 folds : (1A) including Uranus etc. in your calculations /justifications should be avoided unless & until you are able to show they have been talked about by names, or by some other specific mention /"extra grahas" form in any other granthas by the same Vedvyas rishi ji (1B) One can not pick & chose among uranus, neptune, pluto that this time one will chose all 3, that time one will chose 2, on other occassion, one will select only 1 and the like just to match forcefully with the shloka. It has to be regular, and often used and in more than grantha. (2) As per astrology of those times, rahu & ketu are very much part of nav-grahas and alive (not mere mathematical points) as far as astrology is concerned because they give "phal" and are responsible for some happenings, results are attributed to them. So saptagraha simple means from kathavachak point of view = navgrahas - moon & sun = saptagrahas. (3) That these seven grahas must be visible also, maybe is your own assumption. It can be upma alankar by the katha writer comparing celestial with terrestrial. and in this comparison Rahu & ketu can very much attack moon in a hidden /invisible manner as far as katha writer astrological (not astronomical) intention is concerned. Just like whole army does not mean exact 100% count of the army must be seen /visible also. .(4) Meaning, intended interpretation of the said shlok is very much astrological of Rishi Vedvyas ji, as astronomically no planet or 7grahas can ever attack physically any of other planet or 7grahas. So if it is intended to be an upma alankar /metaphor while comparing terrestrial with celestial, then counting EXACT nos. of grahas specifically does not fit in very nicely. Just like above example of 18 akshaouhini sena, conceptof "whole army"etc. . (B) BUT the larger question is the date of Mahabharat, and not just this particular my/anybody's argument /confusion over "saptgrah". All I am personally trying to learn & understand from you is that do ALL (99.9%) the astronomical positions described by katha writer in exact whole 100% of Mahabharat itihas match perfectly (?) if we stick to the date researched by you ? (your hard work is fully appreciated & thanked for by us janata), Or is there at least 1 instance which is not matching with your researched date ? Kindly educate us on this further.

[@finishgoogl7960]

how was jaydrath killed by arjuna actually as per your understanding of mahabharata of 14th day ?

[@finishgoogl7960]

This is important to quell other doubts. Kindly elaborate. Is it not true that jyadrath was taken far away, and arjuna just could not even reach him, leave alone kill him ? If that is misconception, then we have to believe "yogmaya" of krishna ?, so that jaydrath could appear before arjun thinking sun has set ??

[@nitink15]

When is Moon afflicted as per astrology? If it is possible to check degree wise difference between 7 planets and Moon. 1) 3rd, 7th, 10th full aspect of malefic planet Saturn on Moon means Moon degree and Saturn degree difference ~60° or ~180° or ~270° means Moon afflicted 2) Cruel planet Sun's 7th full aspect on Moon is ~180° (+/-15°) degree difference means that Moon afflicted usually occurs near full moon. 3) The 4th, 7th, 8th full aspect of the cruel planet Mars on the Moon means that the Moon and Mars have a degree difference of ~90°, ~180°, ~210° which means that the Moon is afflicted. 4) Mercury declination ~180° (+/- 10°) 5) Venus declination ~180° 6) The 5th, 7th, 9th, 12th aspect of malefic planet Rahu (or Ketu) on Moon means Moon is afflicted when Rahu and Moon have a degree difference of ~120°, ~180°, ~240°, ~330°. 7) Ketu same cause as Rahu 180° opposite to Rahu. I don't think Vyasamuni would calculate any orbits that are not visible to the human eye (orbits of Neptune, Uranus, Pluto). (Prejudice: there was NO availability of strong telescope during writing of Mahabharata). But since the comet is visible(?) to the human eye, Vyasamuni might have described the Comet.

[@ridgeevan7299]

Read surya sidhantha that should stop all your wild inferences !

[@nitink15]

Have u read it?

[@pratikgaikwad8452]

🙏🙏👏👏

[@anirudhajoshi7718]

महाभारत युद्धाआधीची आमावस्या ही चतुर्दशीऐवजी त्रयोदशीला सुरू झाली होती हे खरे आहे का?

[@NileshOak]

No.

[@shreyastp787]

sir please do something for hindus sir . we don’t have any knowledge of our own scriptures we don’t even believe our own selves . give a solution sir

[@madhurimate5250]

Was there dust pollution to hide the sun which helped killing jayadratha?

[@NileshOak]

No.

[@hemishshah6666]

Pranam guruji 🙏 Couldn't it be possible that they were including rahu/ketu as planets too? 7 planets attacking the moon : 1)Jupiter 2)Venus 3)Mars 4)Saturn 5)Mercury 6)Sun 7)Rahu or Ketu Including Pluto, Neptune and Uranus doesn't match up to Indian astrology. With due respect to your knowledge and talent, Pratyaksha anumana says, understanding what our senses can perceive. Vedic astrology has never considered Pluto, Neptune and Uranus as influencing the day to day life, as they have transits in 10/15 years which means they influence generations. Eventhough rahu ketu are chaya grahas, still according to astrology, they can move towards or away from sun as well as moon. Sir, i might be making a foolish claim, I really not care whether I'm right or you're. I really am seeking for truth. As you said that seeking Satya is the final goal of every beings, I really expect you to respect the curiosity instead of feeling humiliated. Dhanyawad guruji 🙏

[@sapanakulkarni6214]

Marathit aahe ka haa video?

[@sunilkpune]

सर, हा व्हिडिओ किंवा ज्या ज्या व्हिडिओ मध्ये जास्त खगोलशास्त्रीय पुरावे आहेत ते कृपया मराठी मध्ये करू शकता? माझ्यासारख्या खगोल शास्त्राचे ज्ञान नसलेल्या दर्शकांना समजणे जास्त सोपे जाईल.

[@sanpatkan]

One of the arguments thrown is that Sanskrit language is only 2000 years old and hence everything considered before that doesn't hold true. All fiction. So how old is Sanskr.

[@NileshOak]

much older than 2000 years. 1. It existed 7500+years ago at the time of Mahabharata 2. It existed 14000+ years ago at the time of Ramayana 3. Anyone with genuine curiosity must research for its antiquity beyond these events.

[@pratibhamalhotra8919]

Thank you ! We are always eager to know how old the Sanskrit language is ! @@NileshOak

[@sridharahullumane4558]

अभिमन्यु की हत्या है..... जयद्रथ की वध।

[@NileshOak]

Correct.

[@finishgoogl7960]

right

[@shubharthidasadhikary1400]

Being a close follower of ur channel, and seeing your hard work in decoding our ancient scriptures is a very knowledgable experience for me. But using the words like "nuts" for people who will not agree with you, or "this video is not for you" if someone does not understand your sarcasm, hurts me as it feels like sense of arrogance of a researcher like you. Writing this comment from a very unbiased opinion.

[@NileshOak]

Namaskar and Thank you. I call folks like myself nuts, but also call those who are dogmatic, idiotic, unscientific and illogical as nuts. They are the bitter kind. They are not called nuts because of their disagreement, but because of their above attributes. Otherwise, disagreements are healthy and progress occurs precisely because of them.

[@anilpatil7576]

Dr.vartak has given proofs for Bhagvan Vyas knew Neptune, प्लुटो urenas in his book स्वयम्भू। I CAN GIVE Page no

[@finishgoogl7960]

Rishi Vyas ji knowing them is NOT enough, in my opinion. Unless & until used extensively in more than1 granthas by Rishi Vyas. Knowing is not doubtful, because they knew much farther about twin star of arundhati & vashishtha. But its extensive usage in many granthas gives authenticity

[@crazylearners9600]

Hindi me boliye

[@deathray8978]

Gita jayanti to 25 December ko manayi jaati hai iska matlab mahabharat 25 December ke baad hua aur makar sankranti bhi 14 January ko manai jaati hai jis din Bheeshm kir mrityu hui to phir ye 29 October kaha se aaya? Views paane ke liye kuchh bhi?

[@tshankar5335]

बिना पढ़े कुछ भी कह देना कितना जायज है !?

[@aisakyu7480]

Abe gadhe vo bhartiy calender ke anusar hai, aur ye jo tum bol rahe ho vo angreji hai. Sankranti ek hi tarikh pe nahi aati beta.

[@finishgoogl7960]

pehele hindu panchange (caledar) padhna seekho, khali comment ke liye kuchh bhi ???

[@JitenPatil]

🙏🙏🙏