29 - Quantum Physics - Particle in a box

[@cheodl]

It's amazing how he can discuss this concept while writing the stuff down in reverse

[@Yashodhan1917]

He's not writing in reverse lol, they flip the video later.

[@arkapatra9852]

r/wooosh

[@vijayanpp186]

I can't flipped.if you flipped, hands won't like that. Left hands become right hand

[@isadorazampol8947]

Thank you for saving a physics student’s life

[@TheNarutoShadows]

Out of all the videos that i have watched, your explanation is best,please keep up the good work, and thanks a lot.

[@Farzad1982Mohaddes]

Fantastic teaching technic and elaboration! Thank you.

[@titusvarughese367]

honestly one of the best explanation

[@juniorcyans2988]

I’ve taken modern physics and mathematical physics, and I did pretty well. But now every thing started to make sense. Everything takes time to digest. This video combines many points I learned from various classes I took. I don’t think my past me could understand it 😅

[@laurenbolger3391]

I dont know who you are but I need to say thank you with my whole heart

[@DeltaSigma16]

This is so helpfull to me, God bless you Sir !

[@alexanderhenn2318]

Like no. 501 was me, You are a genius!!! You helped me tremendously!

[@jays5926]

Thank you very much Cogverse Academy:). Professionalism, at its finest. Cheers from Asia

[@chinmayjoshi25]

Amazin video. learnt more in this than my 2 hour class

[@akkumar8768]

One of the best video lecture❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️love from India.

[@llamear]

Thanks for great explanations!

[@neilh.4385]

Hey I needed a refresher on this topic for my job, hadn't studied this in like 4 years, this was perfect for me. Thanks!

[@mks6805]

im a student of NITR.it is very easy to understand...thanku sir so much

[@CogverseAcademy]

Malay kumar Sethy thanks for watching!

[@jacobvandijk6525]

Finally someone who uses the right symbol for potential energy.

[@wadjo1]

Its V!!!!

[@jacobvandijk6525]

@@wadjo1 No!!! It's U. V is the symbol for potential (in Volts). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_System_of_Units#Derived_units

[@amyliu2394]

Thank you so much! Currently struggling in p-chem.

[@AA-oh6oo]

thank you for making my life easy

[@abdullahismail2770]

Sir how could you write in the opposite direction so perfectly?

[@sscissleepy5160]

god you saved me!!! I am doing chemistry and when learning quantum it kills me...

[@sankeshdehade7075]

You really explain it in a very simple manner. Thank you so much. Could you please upload next lecture videos.

[@darkeagle999]

Very clear explanation!

[@jays5926]

It blows my mind how schrodinger was able to deduce this given only knowledge of what Bohr had provided regarding the theory of the atom and broglies wavelength

[@siddharthsathyab6952]

Writing physics in reverse, this guy!!!

[@abhaparanjape4713]

Nice explaination sir.

[@jolez_4869]

Man where can I learn that type of handwriting??

[@harrisouadamu7758]

Thanks Sir May Allah bless you

[@user-rg1nt9lf4s]

very good content sir. thank you .. sir kindly make a video on Bound States for Potential Wells with no rigid walls.(wkb approximation )

[@kmu1917]

Best lecture👍❤️ from s.korea

[@kunalkhandait9438]

Amazing...

[@isacnewton152]

Please can you do vedio about Solution of schrodinger equation of the hydrogene atom

[@asdfasdf-pk3sb]

This guy is soo cool! :)

[@CogverseAcademy]

asdf1234 asdf1234 physics is cool! I’m just the messenger :)

[@NeonNotch]

So with the eigenfunctions, do they always have to be given or can they be derived from H(psi) = E(psi)? My understanding of eigenfunctions is a bit slim but I know that trig functions and exponentials usually yield eigen functions. How do you know which to use, and when?

[@NeonNotch]

To clarify, I think I've seen k=p/hbar or (sqrt(2mE/hbar)) for equation such as e^(i(kx-wt)) but that should yield something like cos(kx-wt) + isin(kx-wt) rather than Asin(kx)+Bcos(kx). Are we normalizing to get the latter, real function provided above, or is the former a completely different eigenfunction?

[@BivekChettri]

Nailed it down... thanks allott

[@gyandeepbordoloi1035]

nicely explained

[@azice6034]

What does it mean for the areas in the equations n=2,3,4 etc where it’s negative (under the x axis) like physically what does it mean that n=2 has some area under the x axis but n=1 doesn’t for example

[@ProfessorMdoesScience]

The wave function is in general a complex function, so not only can it be negative, but it can also be an imaginary number or a complex number at some points. However, the physically relevant quantity is the absolute value squared of the wave function, which is always positive. In your case for n=2, the absolute value squared of the wave function would be positive on both sides of the well, with equal amplitude. I plot these in a recent video, where it should become clear: kzbin.info/www/bejne/ppO9f2uGmZ2el8U

[@isacnewton152]

Nice vidéo thank you for you effort

[@bijasn5164]

sir the lecture was great

[@CogverseAcademy]

BIJAS N thanks a lot!

[@sachinduhan3022]

Liked and subbed by buildothon.. A very nice video..

[@CogverseAcademy]

BuildoThon thanks:)

[@sachinduhan3022]

You welcome and kindly do the same.. It will be really sweet of you..

[@jamesbentonticer4706]

You should definitely know how to integrate that! That's too important to just skip over and be hand fed the answer.

[@CogverseAcademy]

For an Engineering Physics class, definitely. These videos are for Physics for Life Science majors and typically only require small amounts of calculus if any.

[@jamesbentonticer4706]

@@CogverseAcademy oh okay I didn't know that. I watched the video for the last part on probabilities and I found it very helpful, thank you.

[@CogverseAcademy]

@@jamesbentonticer4706 All good, it's quite unclear from the video itself (these are old and got more attention than initially expected). Thanks!

[@yogeshgharu8417]

Can you please make a video on Finite potential energy well

[@farhantejani8287]

nah but give schloppy top

[@erayschulz1782]

@@farhantejani8287 DM me

[@kislaykunal8921]

i just found enlightenment ....

[@physicsperadox7849]

U r god. Subscribed

[@دياناسفيان-خ6ن]

amazing....thank sooooo much \

[@thejswaroop5230]

it triggers me a bit that x=0 is not at origin

[@shreyashreesarkar5141]

Sir is y = asin kx + bcos kx a general wave equation?

[@azice6034]

Yes I believe so

[@shreyashreesarkar5141]

Sir is y = asin kx + bcos kx tge general wave equation?

[@abdullahismail2770]

Standing wave I guess

[@johnlloydcalisi3257]

it's either you are interested or you have an exam XD

[@eaglevision13]

(2Pi)

[@sachinpathak100]

nice video but many time use different notifications, 1 or I, 2or II, 3 or III.

[@erayschulz1782]

how are you writing that lmao

[@farhantejani8287]

im going to report you bully

[@erayschulz1782]

Farhan Tejani on gawd?

[@DearMajesty]

this isg reat