300 Winchester Magnum Roars Again!

[@johnbutorovich6038]

In 1982 I was 19 years old and I bought a .300 win. Like myDad’s, my rifles have always been a hunting first investment. I brought it home and my Dad looked at it and told me I had really painted myself into a corner. I’ll never forget, he said, “Boy you messed up. Now you have no need for any other gun.” He was so right. I’ve had that rifle for 40+ years and while I have bought other rifles, it has been the only one I ever needed…..antelope, mule deer, whitetailtail deer, big horn sheep, a bear, several elk, and maybe in 2022 a bison have all been handled with ease. I was 19 in 1982 and the recoil took a little getting used too but I haven’t had any issue with it for years. 180 grain Nosler Partition is one load for everything. Probably right at 3000 fps or so. Never chronoed it. I keep my shots fairly close. Rarely do I try anything close to 400 yards. Its an old inanimated piece of wood and steel but I have a fondness for it like an old friend. It embodies a whole lifetime of trips and friends and Dad and uncles and times that are sadly fading into memory. I’m just sixty now but that rifle has been by my side for virtually my entire adult life. It rests in the back of my closet at home until I take it out every now and then and I just admire how reliable and comfortable it has been. I hope every hunter has ONE RIFLE that holds that much meaning. It is a symbol of a life lived on my terms. Priceless. Good luck to everybody.

[@aandscrawfoski]

Thankyou for the nice storey. Makes me feel like part of the 300 fam. In starting out with my 300. Got it siting at 15 pounds and will order a tanker brake. Got a heavy barrel and ali chassie. I'm hoping I wont get launched into outer space when I fire my field piece. God's speed

[@mikehagan4320]

Great story about your Father's comments. And the sentiment that rifles and other inanimate objects hold for us. Like Dutch ovens, motorcycles, wood stoves and Revolvers. For me those items are only a part of the time spent with them. Its the people, Adventure and as you said, the way we have chosen to spend our lives. Priceless! Best Wishes from Montana! M.H.

[@tompaul7317]

1971 Winchester model 70 30-06 my grandfather bought for my great grandfather to hunt with him. Then passed down to me. Old leaupold vari x 2 with flip over scope mounts to use the irons in brush. It’s like my 3rd arm. I have other rifles. But that one. Is something special. That will be my deer rifle until the day I hand it down to my son. It has meaning memories and for a post 64 model quality not many other rifles stand up to. It is just a damn good comfortable rifle.

[@that_08_gmc]

Amen and May God help you with every decision you make. God bless you all🧎‍♂️🧎‍♂️🙏🙏✝️✝️✝️

[@oldcrackadated]

I love my 300 WM I use a tank still muzzle brake , it takes just enough off recoil to suit me

[@jeffboutilier5075]

I've been hunting with a .300 win mag for 35 years. A remington model 700. It is freakishly accurate with the right load (1/2 moa). My son on the other hand uses a 7mm rem mag, I do remember dropping him on his head as a baby, that might explain it. Lol...oh my rifles name is old Bertha.

[@adamshaw8214]

That's funny.

[@wilburnmartin5706]

🤣

[@brentworls8509]

I must have been dropped several times.

[@dohiii]

😄 🤣

[@RH-xr8ms]

Good one Jeff,, I've had my 300 win mag,,,,,,Rem. 700 BDL since 1969 ! Dearly love it. Oh yeah, named mine Rigor Mortis !!! Always reload with Sierra 190 gr HPBT match bullet. Chrony avg. 3027 FPS.

[@joeyanny8018]

I own & have used the the 300 Win Msg, 7mm Rem Mag, 270 Win, 30-06 etc for decades. I also represented Roy W as a patent attorney. All these weapons have done me well & stocked my meat lockers for a long time. They’re all beautiful devices.

[@retiredtofishwildbill4304]

We used our 300 WM for years, never needed anything else. Now, with age and three shoulder surgeries, we stick to our 270. Don't miss that recoil and with in reason our 270 still does the job. Great videos. Thank you

[@gascheck8151]

Try a muzzle brake. I had too due to dental work. Old age gets at us.

[@codybelcher1744]

I run both a 300wm and a 7mm rem mag, both Ruger m77s (I love the m77 rifles). And I’ve found despite the recoil difference I always find my self going for the 300wm. I have no major complaints on 7 rem mag, but the 300 has really boosted my confidence when stretching out for long shots on game. I know the 7rem mag is also a longer range capable round but the opportunity just hasn’t presented its self. I’ll stand by the 300wm if I had to choose one or the other as it’s proven it’s self to me time and time again. (And say what you will, but if I’m not running a magnum cartridge, I’m shooting .308😎, and I regret nothing)

[@eduardoolaechea]

I also have two Ruger M77s in .270 win and .300 win Mag. Though the .270 is lighter and both can do the same most of the times, I am currently leaning towards my .300 and carrying the extra pound.

[@eriksforestryvision8751]

Ruger m77🤘 first book I enjoyed reading as a kid was bolt action rifles. With a m77 on the cover. Couldn't be beat, beautiful browning design

[@dhooter]

This guy just hit that plate at 400yrds off hand with a mule kicking 300 Win Mag!!! If that doesn’t tell you Ron is a BOSS not sure what will. LEGENDARY big game hunter.

[@matthewlyness8161]

Absolutely a true legend in the shooting sports!!!

[@dub7wells103]

300wm is a beast. Hard to go wrong with any of the .30 cals

[@stevenp8198]

as long as its a 300 win mag!!

[@MrCobb-rq8iv]

Esp. the 30-30 win

[@jasonf.4107]

After buying (and using) a 7mm Rem Mag, a 338 Win Mag, a 25-06, and a lightweight 30-06, I bought a 300 Win Mag with the intent of always having it sighted in for a load that could be used on anything I was going to hunt. With a tough 180 grain bullet it is fine for elk and perfect for muley bucks, and is surprisingly good for antelope - it dumps them, and the tough bullets don’t open up enough to ruin a lot of meat like people might imagine it would.

[@twolak1972]

Why did you buy a 300 when you already had a 25 /06 , 7mm mag and 3006. Not begrudging you buying another gun , hell I ,m a gun nut too but for antelope and deer the 25/06. Is about perfect as well as the 7 mag and 3006.

[@jasonf.4107]

@@twolak1972 The .25-06 and 7mm Mag are both walnut stocked, polished blued steel rifles. The 300 is synthetic stock, and stainless steel. In my particular case, that adds to the all-around utility of this particular 300 compared to the other two.

[@pensnut08]

My buddy in Alaska told me to try 180s. He uses them and said the same as you. It wont tear up the deer sized game, but drops them and it would do all I need it to do on any black bear I'll see.

[@Daniel-li1jt]

Another great narrative from Mr. Spomer. I have a 7mm mag and I love it. It has accomplished everything I've needed with out any issues. I've taken game up to 500 yards with it and it was the same scenario as it was at short yardage, either I missed it or I was dragging a deer back to the truck, no in between. However, the standard argument that a 30.06 will do everything a .300 win mag will is true but it depends on shot placement, doesn't take into consideration all hunting conditions. In a real hunting condition, i.e. laying on a rock in an awkward position shooting 350 yards at an elk, I want to have all of the advantages of a magnum caliber. The 30.06 is an awesome round (have one), just as is the .308, both are proven, but the .300 win mag has a proven history of doing the heavy lifting in the 30 cal family.

[@winstonskafte5505]

I regard 300 win and 7mm rem as totally equal .

[@fasx56]

Ron, One has to conclude that Roy Weatherby who came out with His Magnums at such an early date, 1940s I believe you stated, was way ahead of His time. His series of calibers can still hold their own for someone who can handle them. They were more expensive Rifles as was the Ammunition but He has left His Mark among the hunters of the World.

[@googleuser8448]

Ammo still is more expensive in my area.

[@iancurrie8844]

Charles newton was even further ahead then. "The father of high velocity"

[@budlite8207]

I've had a 340 Wby for 30 yrs now. Handloading brings ammo cost way down. Its a mean caliber for sure but it quickly dispatches the critter you pointed it at. 225 barnes my favorite and they are fast

[@andrewgates8158]

Ackley = G.O.A.T. for rifles.

[@FitnessNazi69]

Ackley was for sure a man with great ideas, but Roy was the king of having an idea AND getting it right out the door to the people that wanted it.

[@dredelcottcryptozooligist4101]

I love my 300...pleasant to shoot, economical to reload for, all the range I need for deer, and its 22" barrel is easy to handle in the woods. Yes, the 300 Savage may be the ultimate whitetail round. 😁

[@luvtahandload7692]

👍 I see what you did there. 😁

[@johnmollet2637]

LOL, I bit right up until you said 22" barrel where I did a Tim the Tool Man Taylor. Hrugh? Nicely played.

[@williammcclelland6789]

A common round when I was a boy. I wish more people today would discover what a beautiful and balanced cartridge it is. Absolute perfection in the woods.

[@mmorgan227]

Economical to reload? I knew you weren't talking about the 300 Win Mag!

[@johnmollet2637]

@@mmorgan227 Especially with today's powder prices.

[@justinlowe8038]

Great video Ron ! 300 Winchester is one of my favorites. I would love to see you debate 300WSM , 300 RSAUM, 300 Ruger compact magnum, 300 Winchester, 300 weatherby , 30 Nosler , 300 PRC , 30-378 weatherby, 300 RUM

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Lots of fertile ground to plow.

[@RH-xr8ms]

@@RonSpomerOutdoors Yep,,,also something between the buttpad and shoulder might be a good investment !!

[@RH-xr8ms]

@justin,,,,WHEEEW,,,,A sore shoulder a-coming !!!

[@georgewhitworth9742]

Don't forget the .300 H&H!

[@justinlowe8038]

I had it in mind and forgot to type it .

[@rt66rc86]

Hey Ron, Great video of a great cartridge my friend! I started shooting the .300 Win. Mag. in 1975. I also read Jack O'Connor's excellent article regarding rifles and pressures and hand loading back in the day, which remains valid today. Today, I shoot a Ruger Hunter in .300 Winchester Magnum. I'm hand loading Nosler Long Range Accubonds, 168 grain bullets. My chronograph tells me that my average velocity is 3,350 fps providing 4,200 fpe in that particular rifle. Other than short case life, which is always a by product of high performance loads and a small price that I'm willing to pay, cartridges feed and extract as normally expected. I get right around .5 moa at 100 yards on a given day with that load.

[@CWO3-uscg]

For all the reasons NOT to have a 300 Win Mag (ammo cost, heavy recoil, antique cartridge, etc) I can only think of one reason to go with it. It’s still on the military’s preferred caliber list for snipers inside 1 mile. In fact federal had the ammo contract for the 300WM until recently. Sig Sauer won the contract earlier this year and is ramping up production for the replacement round. Which in my research is why Sig Elite 300WM ammo is hard to find right now as it’s all going to the military.

[@jakepiemme9600]

Hearing the 300 win mag vs 7mag argument reminds me of 06 vs 270 lol. Any of these are great. I no longer shoot magnums because of joint pain from Lymes disease. My 30 06 does me just fine but I do miss shooting long distances with a 7mag. That was my baby too Ron

[@jaydunbar7538]

If you still have your 7mm go to a gunsmith and get a muzzle break put on it, it can do wonders for felt recoil. Makes it a bit longer but if it makes it usable again then I'd say it's probably worth it.

[@lenzadlberger]

Or go, when allowed for you where you are, with a Supressor. A good Supressor is equal when it comes to recoil reduction to a Break with the Benefit of noise reduction, a 7mm rem mag with a good Supressor is something like a 243 Recoilwise

[@raleighthomas3079]

@@lenzadlberger great benefit of the suppressor is the blast reduction, a huge influence in not developing a flinch.

[@waynereid9881]

@@raleighthomas3079 the flinch is real when I got my 7mm I couldn't shoot it at 100 yards but with practice I'm shooting 800 yards and hitting milk jugs after I added a few pounds of lead shot to the butt and forend

[@stevenwagner9912]

Jake, arthritis has done the same to me. I load some 165 grain cast bullets when I want to shoot my 06. I don't hunt anything big anymore. Coyote and prairie dog mostly. So I shoot a 223. If all I could have for life was an 06 or a 270 or a 308, or a8x57, or many other cartridges I wouldn't worry. It's more about developing the skill to make what you have do what you need.

[@fedup3582]

I bought a 300 WSM when it first came out, thought it would be perfect, a nice increase over the 30-06 but not quite the recoil of the 300 win mag, in a relatively compact and lightweight rifle. A few years later, I even built a custom 300 WSM, stainless, ceracoated, trued, bedded, match grade 24 inch barrel, 2.5 lb trigger, synthetic stock. A rifle to hunt most anything, anywhere, any time, any conditions. 15 years later, I'm getting older, less healthy, the custom rifle is gone, the original still hanging around "just in case", most of my other big rifles are gone, my 375, my 450-400..... I still have a 35 whelen and 405 along with the 300 WSM, which will probably handle any hunting I do in the future, but I find my old 06 takes care of business just fine and a few lighter cartridges handle deer/antelope size game no problem. Those heavier kickers aren't as much fun as they used to be. Heck of a note, getting old....

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Getting old might not be a delight, but I believe it beats dying young. Hang in there fed up and enjoy what you can. I can't throw a baseball for beans anymore, but I can throw bullets pretty well.

[@davidnorth4486]

Love the 300WM. My dad taught me to shoot, graduating up to the 300. Hunting in the mountains of Virginia, I've seen that round do things to deer you wouldn't believe. As a gangly 16yo I was able to manage the recoil without flinch. It's all about what you train for. Thank you for this video, and all the great work you do. I really appreciate all the hard work and research you put into your videos.

[@scottdbsn]

The old '06 holds its own pretty well. Thanks for posting.

[@fedup3582]

You have figured that out too, huh?

[@dwhunts]

I love all the fast 30's, and I've had the big 3 (300 WSM, Win Mag, Wby Mag) at various times through the years. I never feel better armed in the field with anything other than a fast 30. I've come back and settled on the 300 Wby Mag. I call it my buck hammer. Does it have a little more recoil? Yeah, of course. Does the flatter trajectory, and higher velocity / energy give me a lot more confidence in the field? Absolutely. To me that's a good trade. Would I be willing to take that a step further and go with the 30/378 or the ultra mag? Absolutely not. I think, for me the venerable old 300 Wby Mag is the sweetest sweet spot. Honorable mention goes out to the 30 Nosler. It's the fast 30 I would have designed if someone gave me a blank sheet of paper and a bunch of money. When and if it becomes more common, it's probably what I'll have.

[@falba1492]

My favorite 30 magnum is the 300 H&H. For the recoil and muzzle blast you get out of the 300 Wby, personally I just stepped up to the 338 WinMag.

[@dwhunts]

@@falba1492 there's definitely an argument to be made for that, but I think a man would be giving up some versatility and flat trajectory. Valid point though. Just depends on what someone is looking for.

[@WillyK51]

Absolutelly Right. I'm on the market to replace my old 1917 Enfield in 30-06. Not because I dislike it, because, rebarrel/ rebore costs about the same as a new $750 Rifle, 300 win mag in most long action rifles and 300 Wby in Vanguard, A serius issue is bullet lengh in 180 Grns for the magnum. 30-06 sweet spot is 165 Grns and Mag is 180 Grns , Mag action allows for longer bullets, specially if you have to use the longer all copper ones

[@poorfatman5317]

@@WillyK51 I had a b110 Savage 30 odd 6 and it love 210 grain bullets the accuracy was phenomenal you could shoot 1/2 inch 5 shot groups at a hundred

[@raleighthomas3079]

My ‘go-to’ confidence rifle is a Weatherby Mark 5 Deluxe in .300 Weatherby Mag. Stock fits me like a glove, epoxy bedded and free floated, trigger at 3.5 lbs., EGW rail, Tally QR rings, Leupold VX-R 3-9x 40mm, 30 mm tube, FireDot reticle. LESS than 1 MOA with ANY factory Weatherby ammo ever fed it. Same with Federal Premium ammo, like Trophy Bonded Bearclaws. More comfortable to shoot than a couple 30-06’s I have. The same exact outcome is very possible with a number of good rifles, that happen to shoot the .300 Win. Mag.! I just had the opportunity at the Wby. happen first, a life bucket-list rifle since I was a kid. 😉👍❤️

[@fbwguy]

I love my 300 WM, it’s an all around great hunting caliber, loaded light at 150gr for deer and up to 220gr for big game. As to your Savage 116, what a great rifle. I have a 116 in 30-06 that is fluted with factory on/off brake. I also have a 16 in 260 REM. Both are super accurate all weather rifles.

[@siciliancapeverde4646]

My favorite all around cartridges are the 300 Win Mag, and the 7MM Rem Mag. To me you can’t go wrong with either one, and imo, they are the best for anything I’m ever going to hunt. I also love my 30-06, and my 270 as well, but I must say, my favorites are the magnums. Great video Ron. I love your channel, been a subscriber since the beginning.

[@googleuser8448]

I have to admit 300 win mag in 180 grn is my favorite, I really don’t know why. And 45-70 is an extremely close 2nd.

[@nataliedeyton6829]

I love this channel ... Ron’s like a waking encyclopedia

[@oldhunter1000]

I hunted the western mountains for Elk with a group of hunters who all used the 7mm Rem Mag. Except our shortest hunter who carried a Ruger #1 in 300 Win Mag. I handloaded a 200 gr Premium bullet for his Ruger. The recoil was Punishing, but it shot very tight groups. I saw my friend shoot a cow elk at just over 100 yards. The bullet struck the shoulder and absolutely slammed that cow down on the spot. There could be many reasons for such dynamic performance, I suspect bullet placement. The only other rifle I've observed that would duplicate that results was the 375 H&H. I've only hunted with that rifle a couple of times and took a large Texas Boar. It's more power than I need but It does inspire Confidence!!! Great Video!

[@gizmocarr3093]

There are advantages to using magnum cartridges; more velocity and more energy. The disadvantages of using them sometimes outweigh the advantages. If 1,000 yard target shooters all start using a new improved cartridge you will see a rise in winning scores. That doesn’t prove it is better; it only proves shooters think it is. The 7mm Remington is just as accurate putting holes in paper as a 300 is. However it only takes one shooter to set a new record score to see the others change to that cartridge. It is pretty obvious if everyone is shooting 300s they will win more matches. That seems to be a reason for the new 6.5 bore trend. These cartridges use less powder and lead to do the same job putting holes in paper as the larger bore ones do. They cost less to use and recoil less as well. That however; doesn’t make them a better hunting cartridge. The old forgotten 300 Holland & Holland is still more efficient than other 300 magnums if you compare powder use for velocity gained. The Winchester 338 is another good example too. If you think your cartridge is good for 400-yards shots; you better practice shooting at 400-yards a lot; and hope you can get closer when the time comes. Field conditions are far different than shooting ranges with benches and range wind flags. ✴🦉✴

[@davep2945]

Yep, you're correct. But this is the internet where everyone shoots at 600 yards without ever practicing at that distance before and they never miss! So facts and reality do not factor into most people's decisions. Truth is most folks have never shot at a target 400 or more yards away. Take them out to a golf course where there's a 400 plus yard straight and downhill hole and they still can't see the flag and they suddenly realize that the 210 yard shot they made last year wasn't anywhere close to the 300 to 400 yards they claimed it was. I'm all for people using what they want but I don't even bother listening to guys who claim the .300 Win mag won't shoot straight at 400 yards or that if you just add a 220 grain bullet to the .30-06 it's now the equivalent of a .458 Win mag. Myths and wives tales or should I say grandpa tales, and outdated information abound and most guys never do the research to know better. So be it. Just nod your head and move along because facts don't matter to them, logic is a conspiracy and real world results that contradict everything they believe are damn lies!

[@WillyK51]

Well if you only punch paper, one of the first 1000 Yds Wembley champion was the 300 H&H, as time goes by a long time ago the 6mm Bench rest was the fav match cartridge, Today you have the most recent 300PRC. Old 300 Win Mag outstanding hunting cartidge, I punch paper to be on target when hunting, I have a 12 pack on the line that I can outshoot my Active Military Son In law that went to Snipper School last year wit my 1917 Enfield in 30-06. Shure I will loose But isn?t it fun?

[@adamkadir3803]

That 300 H&H is an elegant, efficient, smooth feeding .30cal magnum. It easily one of my favourite 30cals despite not owning one anymore. I've got a Win Mag now because I like pushing limits and reloading, and the WM is better for chasing precision with over the H&H, if I was to ever own another magnum hunting rifle, the H&H would be the competition for the other possible cartridges.

[@bobbyrobbins9816]

You forgot to add that the 6.5 Creedmoor will kill a Spinosaurous at 20,000,000 yards. And you don’t even have to aim it either.

[@camwinston5248]

@@bobbyrobbins9816 the thing this new brontosaurus slayer the CM is the BEST at...is marketing genius !!

[@Desertwolf426]

I love my 300WM, I reload my own. I typically use 165 gr Hornady bullets. 165 SST for the range and pronghorn and coyotes. For the moose, elk, black bears and the giant whitetail and mulies here in Saskatchewan I use the 165 gr GMX. These are coming out of my 24" barrel at 3250 fps (no signs of excessive pressure in my gun with some of my brass on their 10th reload) I find the 165s are the best compromise for speed, B.C., and weight for hunting anything I hunt out to 500m albeit 95% of all my harvests have been 350m or less. Great video Ron. Keep up the good work.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks Erin. Sounds as if your 300 is serving you well.

[@Desertwolf426]

It's been my go to rifle for over 16 years.... recently in the past 2 years I have been shooting a 7mm-08 🤪

[@TonyTheFlatlander]

Thank you for these video's Ron! I have learned a lot watching and listening to you. You're wealth of knowledge and experience doesn't go unnoticed and is definitely appreciated.

[@skeetersaurus6249]

My preferred caliber of all of them, the .300 Win Mag! My 'Big Bertha' is a Browning BAR MkII chambered in it, with a nice B.O.S.S. adder, and accurized by an expert...it can drive tacks at 100-yards, and with my handloads, I can get 168-grain projectiles to 1/2-MOA (out of a semi-auto!)...with a VERY NICE 6-24x50 Springfield Armory scope (which cost half what the rifle did, 25-years ago), I've taken two 6x6 elk at 840 and 910 yards...I've NEVER failed to take an animal I pulled the trigger on, with it. There's a reason it is legendary.

[@johnboynotwalton5886]

I am a recent subscriber (10 months) and live in Ohio, the land of only strait-wall cartridges for deer. I don't reload and I am very inexperienced in long distance shooting altogether. In spite of it, I am addicted to your channel and the amazing explanations and history of each cartridge. As a person of detail, your passion inspires me. I could go on. Being new to this and limited to strait-wall cartridges, if you haven't already, could you point me to an optimal strait-wall cartridge for harvesting deer in Ohio. I consider short and long distances, accuracy, and damage vs too much damage. Thanks to Henry and others, pistol calibers come into play along with .350 legend, .450 bushmaster, and 45-70. I have 5 children and am wanting to invest in our future hunting together. Shotgun slugs are what I grew up on, but, coming back to it, I am looking for better options. Thank you for all the videos and for sharing your compelling knowledge and experience.

[@johnnyrobbins1763]

I live in the south so there is no restriction on what we use. But I have friends that own the 300 black out in bolt action and ar 15. They love them and that’s what they use to deer hunt with in the ar15. They are so versatile and they do the job out to 250 yards. You can go with the bolt action with a longer barrel for precision shooting or the ar15 which do a fabulous job also. That’s the main reason I choose the 300 black out because of the versatility

[@brentworls8509]

In Ohio, I'd use any rifle or carbine that's legal with a "4" in it... .44 Mag, .444 Marlin, or .45-70. I appreciate the .350, but, I think there is better terminal performance in the ones I mentioned. Add the .375 Winchester to the discussion if you can find one. .405 Winchester has a "4" in it too... My experience with the .357 in a carbine leaves it wanting on deer. They just don't react much to getting shot one or two times. Personally, if going to Belmont or Guernsey County to hunt, I'd take my 1895 in .45-70 because I trust it 1,000%. If I knew I was on a small parcel with short shots, my .44 1894.

[@johnboynotwalton5886]

@@brentworls8509 Thanks Brent. That is some good information that I will use. That presents a number of firearm options and follows the hunch that I already had. I started looking at .450 bushmaster because I am seeing the ammo available. For my younger shooters I think an AR platform with a little less recoil and an adjustable stock will fit the need.

[@brentworls8509]

@@johnboynotwalton5886 I hear lots of good about the .450, I just haven't used one. I'm a lever nut, so when Ohio made the switch, I was already set up. Now if WV and Ohio would cheapen the reciprocity of license prices... Good luck, and shoot straight.

[@warrengreen3217]

I like the 444 marlin

[@robertrogers7610]

I bought a 300wm 4 yrs ago I took an Oryx woth ot in 2018. One shot downand dead. 220 Gr rn, it shoots 1 moa all day Long. Stiff recoil, I only weigh 123 lbs, but its still manageable , Best caliber Ive ever had.

[@Bayan1905]

I have a .300 Magnum, BUT, it's a .300 H & H Magnum. I really love that round and the gun it's in. I don't have a love for the .300 Winchester Magnum, tried, but I can't. The old .300 H & H Magnum is just one of those calibers, refuses to die and does what it needs to.

[@falba1492]

I have two 300 H&H’s. I couldn’t agree more. The case is more efficient than the 300 Win Mag, and who cares if the action is 3/8” longer.

[@williammcclelland6789]

Would love to see a video on this one.

[@falba1492]

@@williammcclelland6789 - See desert dog outdoors. He did a really nice history on the 300 H&H.

[@williammcclelland6789]

@@falba1492 Seen it twice. It's a good one. Love to hear Ron's perspective.

[@scottscheuerman6170]

I have shot the 300 Winchester magnum and the 300 ultra magnum but last summer I had a chance to get a 300H&H in a pre 64 Winchester 70 and the first time I shot it I like it better than the other 300 mag cartridges It seems super accurate and it doesn’t jar your teeth to do it

[@naldahide]

I got into my .300WM (Rem. 700 BDL built in 84' for $400) because the price was right.. but like you, I've found it to be very versatile (from 400 lb black bears to white tails, moose and elk) and can hand load across the entire spectrum of available .30 cal. bullets! My favorite bear/elk load is the barns 180 gr. ttsx over 70 gr.s RL22 in norma brass and a win. LRM primer.. very accurate and still packs a punch @ 500 yds.. I think it is arguably just as a popular as the (another fine cartridge) venerable 30-06! Can't go wrong with the old school!👍🇺🇸

[@jamesfarmer63]

My 300wm is a Remington 770 and it shoots awsomely

[@thepolarisman500]

I like the 300 win mag because my grandpa used one from a Winchester model 770, which was passed down to my dad and then passed down to me. That rifle has taken more deer than I could keep track of!

[@jimmiewhite9917]

Hello I like the 300 wm because it’s a all around very good hunting rifle

[@dennismacwilliams196]

The golf saying was the best, I still have a smile on my face... Thank's

[@christhomsen1653]

This is the first video of yours that I have watched. I like your presentation and plain talk delivery. I've subscribed and will be watching many more of your videos. To topic: I switched to .300 Win Mag. in 1975 and use a Win Mod. 70. I absolutely love it. Most of my hunting is now in WY. The group of guys that I hunted with (Me being one of seven) all use Rem. 7mm Mags. The oldest of our group and (in my opinion) the best shot, changed back to 30-06 in the mid '80's. I'd never known him to miss what he aimed at and most all his game was a one sot kill. I very happy both with the rifle and the round. I usually use 180 gr BTSP on the deer, 220gr Silver Tips on elk. Seldom need a followup shot as one does the trick. Usual distance is between 250 to 400 yds. I reload and have reloaded 7mm Mags. for my friends. The ballistics are close enough between the two rounds. I'm in my late 60's now and most of my hunting companions have moved on to Heavenly hunting grounds where i hope to reunite with them some day. I now suffer disabilities from injuries from on the job so the 300 Win Mag reaches out for me. I've made 900 + yd shots in the past and taken some nice mule deer at that distance, however, with age, my eyesight isn't what it used to be but the rifle and round can still do it even if I can't. I was brought up on "one shot, one kill" and never shoot to wound. It's always been: "If you don't think you can take it with one shot: Don't shoot!". It works for me and I'll stick to it until I die or can no longer physically hunt. Hopefully, those conditions will come at the same time.

[@williamthomas3620]

I have taken a 7mm Rmag and 338 Wmag to Africa and both worked as planned. Its the bullet that does the work. A friend swore by his 300 Wmag with 250 grain bullets as "lion medicine" but I never tried my guns on the cats.

[@OnTheFritz602]

Great Cartridge! Have an opportunity to get a .308 Norma Mag, and always thought that was a fine cartridge. Not quite the Win Mag, but quite the step above the '06. Excellent video, and I am glad to own a 7mm Rem Mag built on a Husky branded FN Mauser action. Had it custom built for my Dad when he retired, and he used it in Wyoming on several hunts. He just passed, and it's now in my hands along with several classic rifles he owned. Sorry to waffle on, but going through quite an emotional time.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Sorry for your loss, Fritz602. Sounds like you have some great memories to help you honor your Dad.

[@OnTheFritz602]

@@RonSpomerOutdoors Thank you Ron for your reply, I sincerely appreciate it. That's my Dad's name, as is mine. But I need to know where to get your "signature" hat, I love it! Also a dissertation on the 8mm Rem Mag would be interesting, as it was touted as being the next big thing in my first (and only) Hornady manual I bought in the early 80's. It fizzled faster than it's velocity!

[@404nitro]

Excellent video👍 I love the 7 Rem mag as well (very much so), but it simply won't equal the 300 mag's. I own one and both the 300 Win and 300 H&H ( I owned a beautiful custom 300 Wby several years back as well) and I can tell you the 300 H&H will equal the 300 Win in equal barrel lengths with decent handloads. It is my favorite of the three. Nothing feeds as smoothly either. To me, all energy numbers are, are a way to compare cartridges based on a formula that heavily favors velocity, so I hate to use energy figures, but it's really all we have (that most folks are aware of anyway). I've killed animals with all three rounds and have owned multiple rifles for each round as well, so have a decent spectrum to compare each of them based off of. I would never knock anyone for choosing any one of the three with the exception of the brown bear. There, I'd much [refer the 300's and would prefer my 340 Wby over all of them.

[@bobbyrobbins9816]

If the 7mm will not equal the 300s, then the 6.5 creedmoor will never equal the 270,280 etc. Glad you just proved my point

[@404nitro]

@@bobbyrobbins9816 I agree, and IMO the 6.5 creed, while a nice little round, is more hyped than it should be.

[@zorro456]

Probably the best way to train for recoil is Shotguns. A lot don't realize how much recoil they are absorbing.

[@Marcusb338]

The best way to train is get out there and shoot, when you’ve got buck fever the last thing on your mind is recoil usually

[@johncox2865]

12 gauge? No Thanks !

[@mikemuench3075]

Amen. 12 gauge with 3 inch slugs. Ouch.

[@randyschaff8939]

Been using it since 81. No problems whatsoever! Accurate, Flat shooting, Never seen anything else hit harder! It’s a combination of bullet weight and velocity with that 180 grn. bullet. I have tried lots of different calibres. It is right at the limit before it starts to waste the powder like the Weatherby. It is essential that you shoot this round plenty so you can get used to it. The people at Winchester really knew what they were doing! Good Vid!

[@lionellulow4168]

3winmag is my absolute favorite cartridge ever with 243 hot on its heels. Fantastic round, bit much where I hunt but I gotta say it does all I need. Mr Spommer thank you for doin this video.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Right on

[@paulwiltzius8365]

Hi Ron I really enjoy listening and learning from you. I've been loading for almost 50yr and only shot 200+ yards. My joy has always been the hunt. My Dad taught me to shoot. My Calibrates are 243., 270. and 30-06..

[@glennearl5621]

I've got a muzzle brake on my Sako 300 Win Mag. It works and I can shoot it all day. Not getting used to the recoil but sidestepping the recoil instead. That does have the potential make me unpopular with other shooters on the firing line but that potential has yet to be a reality.

[@randomname6710]

I've got a muzzle brake as well, can't imagine why you wouldn't use one. It's def worth the added inch of length. That being sad, everyone just likes to wine about recoil.

[@ArcherBowman]

My most accurate rifle is the .300 Win Mag, Browning Stainless Stalker (with BOSS) - shooting Hornady Custom 165gr ammo. 5 rounds through the same hole (.5") at 100 yrds. A real sweetheart. It makes me feel good about myself.

[@bryanjaeck4828]

I had a 300 Win Mag, hand loads with 200 Nosler Partition bullets, driving the bullets a few grains over max loads of powder. It killed elk with one shot kills out to 500 plus yards, it was hell of a rifle. It was not gun / load you wanted to sit down and shoot 40 rounds from the bench, it hurt. I did find the rifle was surprisingly accurate. I no longer go elk hunting so it had to go.

[@russellkeeling9712]

I'm sorry to hear you no longer go elk hunting. My long trek elk hunting days are about over also. There were many memorable years though. 2018 was my very best and most memorable elk hunt. I hunted alone at 68 years old, spotted the elk, snuck as close as possible without exposing myself and made a one shot kill at 266 yards with a handloaded .444 Marlin. I was then able to get the elk to my truck by dragging it and getting it in the truck whole. At times I wondered if someone was going the find my body along with that elk because of a heart attack but I did it. There was something primal about doing it all myself and very self satisfying.

[@DEVILDOG1964]

I JUST GOT BACK FROM CRAIG COLORADO AND SHOT A 6X5 AT 290YDS AT A 45 DEGREE ANGLE DOWN HILL. 1ST SHOT GRAZED THE TOP OF THE BACK CUT HAIR. AIMED LOWER STILL HIGH BUT UNDER SPINE WENT TEN YDS DOWN. I AM A FLAT LANDER. I SHOT A 2ND BIGGER 6X5 ELK IN UTAH WITH A SAVAGE BEAR HUNTER 300 WIN MAG AGAIN HIT THE ELK 3 FOR 3 AT 320 YADS DOWN HILL AGAIN. I LOVE THE 300 WM.,180 NOSLER PARTIONS BOTH TIMES AND TWO DIFFERNT SAVAGE BEAR HUNTER RIFLES.

[@joepayne7843]

I'm like Ron. I love my 7mag , and I have a Winchester model 70 in 300H&H, and I love that rifle. It's crazy accurate with 200grn bullets. It's all about preference. They all do the job.

[@bcallahan3806]

This hits home + some added information. I ran used 06 woodmaster that was basically a single shot. Stepfather ran 7mm mag 24 inch that barked. Unmistakable when fired. When it was time for me to replace. We went to the books. At the time off the shelf ammo was not so diverse. So even with his 7mm mag. He told me me too go 300 based on ballistics. Absolutely correct on kick. It's not a target shooting gun. I have no issues with it. But have friends with black eyes or reverse C scars in the middle of their foreheads. Barrel length plays a big difference. As I said, 7mm mag Winchester 24 let's out a bark like no other. Both great guns. But it if your hunting with multiple people. It's always great to know the sound. That way you know who shot and where. Great Video

[@hammerheadms]

I can't say 300WM is any better or worse than other magnums in the same class. It does the job pretty good in my experience. The only gripe I have is the rifle I have chambered in it is very light weight, and shooting is knocks me around a bit, and I am over 200lb., and 6 foot tall.

[@richardcolligon4277]

I can't say the 300 winmag is the best at anything, but it's very good at everything.

[@Jezus42]

I don't have one my friend does. It's about a 8-9lb rifle all together. I'm 215 and 6' he's 6'2". We like it very much!

[@Jezus42]

Of course me like magnums!

[@hammerheadms]

@James Lundy I never said I didn't like shooting it. If there was a conspicuous lack of testicular fortitude in me I would be afraid to take that gun out of my safe. Quite the contrary. That is the gun I am building up to hopefully go out west with. I love the accuracy (at least I did before the recoil loosened the scope mounts). My plan is to mount a new scope (which I already bought), and replace the stock and give the old one to my brother (who needs to replace an identical one for his rifle). Then I want to have a muzzle break put on it because of the barrel rise.

[@michaelb4528]

Thanks Ron. You have the best "NO BS" videos in the industry. Never hating on one or the other. I am currently in the market for a .30cal rifle. I can see no reason in my research to get anything but the 300 win mag.

[@jamesbolfing8109]

Well that is a sweet little Savage you have there, Ron. I loved the part where you hit the bulls-eye dead center, right after saying you were wiggling all over the place. In archery, that is called "floating the pin" Haha! But I have found that if I am hunting and take a shot while standing, I do not miss. As to where, after taking the time to get on some shooting sticks, I sometimes would. That super-light synthetic looks like it has quite the kick, too. Jumped right out of your hand! Seriously, thanks for not editing that out brother. It helps to demonstrate the power of the cartridge. No joke, the very first time I ever shot my 300 Win Mag... it gave me a little smooch on the forehead. I was sighting it in right at sundown, with the setting sun directly in my face. So, I had my head tilted down to try to block the sun with my hat, and BAM. Luckily it was just barely enough to break the skin. It was the first time I had ever been scope-punched. And I felt like because it was from my brand new 300 Win Mag, that it was definitely, well worth it! I use 180 gr Hornady SST @ 3130 fps at the muzzle and sectional density of .271. There is nothing that I will ever see that this will not be enough to bring down. Where I hunt, there are free-roaming exotics and you never know what you might see. Usually would only expect to take White-tail, Axis, feral hog. I've have taken one Aoudad as well. But I have seen some Red Stag and there are even Elk roaming in the area. So being prepared is the only way to go. But the 300 Win Mag couldn't do any better than the 7mm Remington could. I used to say if I had to choose just one cartridge, it would be the 30-06. Because of the availability of ammo. But these days, (prior to the ammo shortage) I would say that the 300 Win Mag would probably be just as prevalent.

[@jamesbolfing8109]

Well, I certainly know as I am increasing in my years, that I have also been increasing my ability to forget simple things that have happened within them. So whenever I remember something that I did not know that I actually had forgotten, it is "mostly", a wonderful event to take place. Feeling the contentment, remembering exactly how something happened. Then a feeling of resentment, (not wonderful) for the fact that I ever allowed myself to forget it in the first place. So, I just now (for some odd reason) remembered a part of the story that I told in the previous post about myself getting "scope-punched" by my 300 Win Mag. I had told about trying to block the sun from eyes with the brim of my hat, but that was not all that happened. It was the first time I ever shot it, and I did not know the trigger pull was so light. I was indeed trying to block the sun with my hat, but I was actually just trying to get into position when I "accidently touched the trigger" while I was leaning forward. I'm lucky it did not open me up big-time. I have seen those turn out pretty bad. When I remembered this detail, I wanted to immediately correct my deficit. Because I love telling on myself and laughing at myself, as well. Ain't no shame in my game. Oddly, no one else has posted anything else after I did, for an entire week now. Because of this, it was effortless to find my post. To add this quite relevant and pertinent detail to my historical event. So thank you to no-one for making it so easy for me to find my post and fulfill this task. And now that I have, you may proceed in telling all your wonderful stories. Have a great day

[@RH-xr8ms]

@ James,,,,, Man, your scope bite brings back memories !! I hunted deer and elk in the Mesa country around Dubeque, and Parachute Colorado from 1969 to 1991 every year with a Remington 700 BDL 300 win mag. Every day after we came to camp, the outfitter would collect 10 dollars from everyone in the camp that had a rifle. Then he would pick out a place where there was a white rock way off and way UP for us to shoot at. Well to try for the money, all of us would really crank in all we had to hit the damn rock, and nearly all would get the scope bite. That went on for years until the cook,(outfitters wife) spilled the beans. Shooting uphill really brings the scope close to the forehead, and the ol outfitter and hie sons always had a lot of fun. It didn't stop us tho, because we loved it when we hit the rock and collected the $ !!

[@nmelkhunter1]

Great video! Love me the 300 WM. I have a Savage Weather Warrior that shoots 180 Accubonds at 3050 fps into 1/2” groups at 100 yards. But, like Ron, my favorite is the 7MM Rem Mag since my first rifle was in this cartridge.

[@haroldmilroy4489]

My experience differs from yours when it comes to fast kills. I have found the 300 mags drop most game animals quite a bit quicker than 06s or 308s. The Wby seems to be the ideal choice but the Win isn’t far behind. As for moose those I’ve harvested or seen taken just seem to take time to figure out they’re dead and that range of calibers includes 30-30s (yes it can kill moose cleanly at moderate ranges) to the 375 Wby. I’ll liken your choice of the 7RM to Jack O’Connor’s wisdom in his discussion of the 270 vs the 06. For lighter big game the 7 might be a bit better. For the heavier animals the larger bore might be ahead. Obviously you have to be able to shoot accurately with either or else all the velocity means very little so recoil does play a role however the 300s (moderate versions) don’t recoil as much as many may think. My two cents

[@benbryant1693]

i have shot 30-06 quite a bit and the 300wm does not have too much more of a recoil impulse (to me) than 30-06... i have a bull-barrel 300wm though, so that extra weight makes a difference...

[@WillyK51]

Buddy with all the posibilities it's hard to make up your mind. Grew up reading Elmer Keith with big bore hard cast bullets and a the same time Jack O'Connor with the 270 Win. Well I hunted with a 30-06 because it was what I had. Today looking to upgrade from my 1917 Enfield (and the 30-06 is Fantastik) to a bit faster 180 Grns Win mag, Availability wheigts a bit over the 300 Wby (I handload so either isn't a problem) Yet Im 70 and hoping to pass on the rifle to my 7 yrs old grandson to teach him hunting, so a 7 MM Rem mag might be a better choice handloaded down to 7-08 for teaching. Personally a 358 would be my choice from rabbits to Bear

[@haroldmilroy4489]

@@WillyK51 Agree with your comments. There's a huge number of cartridges that all are so close there's really not that much practical difference but the hype around them all makes choosing one more complicated than it needs to be. What 358 would you pick? From a lot of the research I've done and a little real experience I think the 35 bore is a bit of a game changer. That said, I don't have much experience with the 35 bore. I have a bunch of books by both of the gentlemen you mentioned. I think the greatly improved bullets we have (when you can find them) make a difference.

[@WillyK51]

@@haroldmilroy4489 I have a 1917 Enfield in 30-06 with a verry pitted barrel, ,35 Whelen easy choice, yet reboring or rebareling or upgrading to a 300 Win Mag style cartridge almost as expensive as a new $ 750 rifle, My fav. for the very close range hunting enviroment ( spook something 40 yrds out to way out yonder 150 yds) is a Browning BLR in 358 Win. The Savage 110 Storm is the one I have in mind in 300 Win Mag, Can easily swap a 338 Win Mag/ 358 Norma mag barrel or down to 7MM Rem for my Grandson. For close range Pigs/Deere a 180 grns pistol bullet or 35 Rem type bullet is fine, Elk/Moose/Bear a 250 Grns Partition in at least a 35 Whelen, You might have to take a not broadside shot and that one will do the job. 338 Win Mag might be the the best big/medium bore choice, If your ammo doesn't arrive you can probably find a box out there

[@haroldmilroy4489]

@@WillyK51 Interesting that you mention the 358 Norma as it seems to have faded alot. Great caliber and I personally would get that before a 338 WM. From my limited experience with the caliber I would side with the first AK Master Guide, Mr Hal Waugh who said a big bang but results may not match the bang. I'm sure others have had better results as its quite popular so there has to be a reason. I have 3 - 300s. Two Rugers and a Remington. I am very fond of the 358 Win and think the Whelan is a superb cartridge along the lines of one I'm trying to get built - a 9.3 X 62. Theoretically at least a tad better than the Whelan but I doubt there's much difference at least for use in North America. The heavier bullets for the Mauser might matter a bit on really large game.

[@garrettforchrist2700]

Lots of good information! It was pretty cool watching you shoot that 300 Winchester Magnum!🇺🇸✝🇺🇸

[@alexfortin7209]

With magnums, the bigger is better as long as you handle the recoil! Realistically, most hunters can’t handle anything more than 30-06 recoil in a 9 pound rifle so 7 Rem Mag is a better choice for most. That being said, if you’re willing to put the time and effort to master them, both 300 Win Mag and 338 Win Mag are really worth it for large game.

[@mh4392]

I am one of the many fans of the .300 Win Mag as well. I love the power, and it’s reasonably affordable. Recoil is heavy, but not aggressive. I hunt with the new Norma Bondstrike, that’s a beast of a load. 180 grains at 3100 fps, they hit like a sledgehammer.

[@RogerSnell]

Great comparison! Since I have the 30 06 and the 7mm Rem mag. I'm just not sure I have a need or great desire for the 300 Win mag. I have more than I need for anything inside 500 yards and even beyond. The 300 is a magnificent round, though.

[@dougking5703]

You probably don't but it's always fun adding another rifle in another fine caliber

[@RogerSnell]

@@dougking5703 Yes it is!

[@benbryant1693]

i bought a savage 300 WM a couple of years ago after comparing 7mm Rem Mag with it.... i just liked the bullet versatility (as you mentioned) and the fact that it generally hits with more force at longer ranges. -they have very similar ballistics for similar-sized bullets and powder loads... anyway, i think you won't go wrong with either one! -thanks for the vid!!

[@benbryant1693]

p.s. i saw your vid comparing 300wm to 300prc... another good vid! factory ammo for 300prc is generally about twice as expensive per round as 300wm, making the 300wm a more economical choice...

[@russellkeeling4387]

I know lots of people that hunt elk with a 7mm rem mag. It is however the caliber I have seen more elk hit and then run away to never be found. An example, my father used to have a 7mm mag. and he shot a big bull at about 200 yards right in the shoulder. He hit the big bone and the bull didn't even go down. The 175 grain bullet hit the bone and destroyed the bone but it stopped the bullet pieces and no vitals were hit. 5 miles later I was able to get a shot at that bull and stopped it with a 7x57 and a 140 grain bullet at about the same distance. I don't believe it is the fault of the rifle but the hunter expecting to be able to harvest the elk no matter where it is hit.

[@brazzy1467]

I just had a proof research carbon fiber wrapped barrel put on my Remington 700. I also had the end of the barrel threaded so I can use my suppressor on it. It's a lite 300WM hunting rifle with almost no recoil. It's now my favorite hunting rifle.

[@curtis6554]

I have both the 30-06 and the 300win mag and love them both . after damaging 3 vertebra in my neck and a couple of surgeries I could not take the recoil of either one . A friend talked me into putting a muzzle break on both and now they have the recoil of my 308 which is tolerable . I love the 300 it is my go to rifle with a good 180 grn. rnd . I am very confident when taking a shot .

[@curtis6554]

same surgery same issues same calibers and like you I love them both . in my life 30 caliber rules .

[@jackmurphy8696]

Was the damage from the recoil?

[@jfess1911]

Velocity was King when the 300WM was developed. Minimal drop to 400 and 500 yards was what was wanted. Before laser rangefinders became common, the light, fast bullets minimized range estimation errors. As Ron stated you need to get beyond 400 or 500 yards to see much advantage to heavier, higher BC bullets.

[@Bourbon-Canted-Ky-Windage]

Roar of the 300! Great title! Great video Ron! I really look forward to the ballistics charts and all the download you're putting up!

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks Danny. Enjoy!

[@tonykiphart3752]

I won a Montana Rifle in 300 win mag NRA's gun of the year. I am an old high power rifle match shooter with 30-06 rifles. I have taken elk, mule & whitetail deer and black bear with both the 30-06 and the 300 win mag. I like cooper 160 gr to 165 gr bullets in 30-06 & 300 win mag they give good hunting performance with manageable recoil

[@chadlemons8555]

Awesome video! I have 2 rifles chambered in 300 win mag a Ruger m77 and a Winchester 70 love them both for hunting here in Alaska. My model 70 has been magna ported and recoil is about like my 308 very pleasant Keep up the good work. Would love to see some videos on the 375 ruger and 416 ruger !😁 two of my other favorites

[@curtis6554]

I put a muzzle break on my 300 win mag with same outcome recoil of a 308 maybe a little less .

[@Clambelly]

.300 Win Mag is the preferred SNIPER RIFLE and works well in heavy barreled, full-size benchrest style stocks that are designed to absorb the recoil. Meanwhile, the most popular USED rifle is .300 Win Mag, because most guys try it the first season and realize that the recoil is excessive in a lightweight hunting rifle. All the excess recoil, barrel length, burned powder, and cost of ammo is unjustifiable to anyone who knows how to stalk game, close the distance and hold-over. The .30-06 remain the King of all Cartridges, just as the 1911 is irreplaceable and without equal.

[@bcpioneer59]

Finally, thank you ;-) I have always been a fan of the 300 WM I have shot many different calibers in my 45 years of hunting, and IMHO none really compare. I have owned the 7mm, and I know it is your favorite, but my skin crawls every time I think about that caliber lol. I have taken moose with my 416 Rem mag and my 375 Ruger, but mostly the 300 wm all did the job, but none as versatile as the 30 caliber . I am not a gun collector and I do not like having something sitting around that I do not use, so I have a limited arsenal but they are used. My 300 win is my go to rifle, I have taken many moose over 400 yards and a few just over 500 yards using a mono bullet since they came out and always successful kills. The only bullet I load now for every game is the 165 GMX at 3260 FPS and it does the job exceptionally well. Thanks for your videos, they are always great, we just have to cure you of that 7mm fetish you have lmao

[@WillyK51]

I don't think anyone is undergunned with a 7 MM Rem Mag. I'm between a hard place and a rock choosing between both, Me, 300 Win to replace my old 30-06, but I will pass on that new rifle to my 7 Yrs old Grandson if I live long enough to teach him hunting, For a youngster the 7 mm might be better. I can always down handload to 7-08 recoil to teach him

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks Mike. I'll join 7mms anonymous.

[@bcpioneer59]

@@RonSpomerOutdoors LOL Good luck I hear there is a long wait list . I certainly appreciate all the information your provide, thanks

[@aspitofmud6257]

I've been shooting a 30 06 for a long time. I found loading 130gr bullets make it a very flat shooting rifle. Great for deer in the desert. Yep.

[@tim7052]

Totally agree!! The 30/06 is so versatile - and still holds it's own today. 👍

[@DeepOwl1073]

I'm trying Barnes ttsx 130s this year.

[@larrysayers1377]

Great video and presentation on the .300WM. I have owned a couple 300s in Rem and Sako rifles but I no longer have them. The reason is I just found other calibers killed just as effectively and I didn't have to put up with recoil. And I did shoot a 7Rem Mag for many years, as well as 280s and 7-08 (my current favorite). I once shot a 6x7 elk with a 300 loaded with 190 bullet at 65 or 70yds it ran off quite a distance before I caught up and finished it off. A year later I shot another 6x7 in the same area with a handloaded 140gr Nosler Partition in a 270WSM. Distance was about 60yds. It too ran off but piled up about 50yds away. The difference was the shot placement. Now, I have my sights set on a Sauer 101 in a 7 Rem Mag (just because I want to) but I highly doubt I will ever go back to a 300. There are so many high performing bullets and factory ammo now that shoot so great in my 06 I don't really have a need a heavier magnum. Keep the videos coming Mr. Spomer.

[@gerardgoubel4169]

Tous les cal 30 sont bons après rester dans des distances raisonnables pour placer sa balle et tuer propre.

[@VexChoccyMilk]

I like my 300WM because when I was buying my first rifle I said I wanted something I could take moose hunting in the far future, and they guy upsold me on it from the .270 win or the 7mm Rem Mag. He showed me the cartridges for both and obviously more bigger means more better. Left-handed Browning X-bolt medallion.

[@whiteyfisk9769]

The 300 will do it all from Antelope to Moose...even grizzly although id want a 375 H&H if i was gonna hunt them often.

[@VexChoccyMilk]

@@whiteyfisk9769 I would really like to get a Ruger No. 1 in .375 one day. I've held a couple, very nice rifles.

[@eksemos]

Ron, I asked a few questions on the Ron Spomer Outdoors site regarding ammunition availability. I had a variety of calibers in mind when I asked the questions, and the 300 Win Mag was one of them. I'd really appreciate it if you'd answer the full range of questions as I'm certainly not the only person wondering about these aspects. Thanks... Really enjoy your channel, content and presentation style!

[@tacman2893]

Nothing against the 300 Win Mag but I still feel the Weatherby version of the 300 is a better round. I am also a 7mm Rem Mag fan. But are any of them actually “bad”? 👍👍

[@davidpallin772]

I don’t think the big game you’re shooting at know the difference.

[@JamesWillmus]

I've got both the 30-06 and the 300 w.m. I've built them to complement eachother. The 300 has a great scope on it and is ready for shooting 200-500 yards. The 30-06 has a peep sight and is great for sub 200 yard shots at game. The idea is one will be used in open country, the other will be used in the brush or to pick off wounded game. Both are savage rifles. The 116 is in 300 like what Ron has in the video, the 30-06 is an 80's era Savage 110 that's had peep sights added to it.

[@BMWQC]

I love my model 70 300 win. It makes a wonderful mule deer and elk cartridge. If you are recoil sensitive get a heavy gun and shoot the common 180 grain bullets such as a power point or core lokt and the recoil is not bad at all. But you will definitely feel the hotter loads

[@HikeHuntHaul]

Excellent point(s)! 😃👍🏻 180 plus actually settles the rifle recoil down.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Mr. Wragge, I'll have to red flag you on this one simply because it's contrary to Newtonian physics. Recoil is a product of ejecta weight and velocity. The heavier the bullet you push at any cartridge' highest speed, the more recoil it will generate in a given weight rifle. You may perceive it as less, but it is not. Sorry.

[@mackellyman5642]

@@RonSpomerOutdoors Ron, I love your RED flags..

[@HikeHuntHaul]

@@RonSpomerOutdoors Thanks for the reply Ron. By using the words "settles the rifle recoil down", I mean the snappy recoil feels more like a push than a "snappy jab". However, Hornady states that a 180 grain GMX (Reloader-22 (73.7gr.) vs 150 grain GMX (Reloader-22 (74.3gr.) has equal velocities (book noted @ 3000-FPS). In fact, the Hornady Reloading manual 10 doesn't allow loads for 150gr. bullets above 3300FPS where 180gr. only goes upto 3100FPS. The pressure is too high for the powder grains handled in the case and bolt. The book references 225 grain Hornady bullets upto only 2800FPS. Does this mean a 225 grain bullet produces less "kick" than a 150 grain bullet with more velocity according to the reloading manual? I'd argue yes. Your completely right in your answer, "heavier the bullet you push at any cartridge' highest speed, the more recoil it will generate in a given weight rifle"; however, we can't do this according to reloading manuals and SAAMI specs. So, theoretically kick would be less in this case based on bullet grain size and powder loads. Newton's law is correct but that is an extreme which we aren't allowed to get to in these loads. This is an awesome conversation for shooters because anytime "rifle kick" is argued people shy away from the 300 win mag. My point is shooting heavier bullets will "kick" less based on grain weights referenced to powder loads relating to their velocities. If this were the case then we could use 80+ grains of RL-22 to get a 225 grain bullet to true max velocities around 3100FPS. That might "kick" harder but unfortunately the pressure(s) are too high (above 64,000 psi). The load cannot occur. Unless, someone out there is meeting this load development? That would be a super heavy barrel to withstand the pressure. Rifle weight is a huge factor on rifle kick. I'd definitely argue the heavier a barrel the less recoil felt. Bench rest shooters show this with 22-pound rifles to adsorb the recoil or "kick". Newton also states that "elastic collisions" that are equal transfer energy equally between each other (like a car hitting a parked car - transferring the energy of motion into the parked car to stop the first moving vehicle). I'd argue that this is an unequal transfer of energy because barrel harmonics don't allow for an equal transfer of energy distribution. The rifle absorbs energy and distributes it along the stock and into the shooter. A heavier barrel and stock would improve this off balance. It would be like putting the rifle against a brick wall and firing. The rifle isn't hardly going anywhere; but an off-hand shooter can be kicked backwards. I'd also reference these two article that talk about bullet weight(s), rifle weight, and "rifle kick". Thanks for the reply. Awesome conversation. :-) Reference Rifle Recoil Table. (n.d.). Www.chuckhawks.com. Retrieved October 2, 2021, from www.chuckhawks.com/recoil_table.htm ‌Shoot heavier bullets equalHanson, M. (2018, March 30). How to Choose Bullet Weight - What is It & Why It Matters. Targetbarn.com - Broad Side. www.targetbarn.com/broad-side/what-is-bullet-weight/

[@bobparvin9773]

My favorite of all time is the 300 win mag. I've got a Vanguard and I ain't ever missed anything I ever have shot at with it. My favorite load is the 200 gr. E.L.D.X. at 2975 fps.

[@oncall21]

Hey Ron. Another great video and an interesting one. I've just gone back to the 300 Win Mag and bought one in a Tikka T3X. I own a 308, 30/06 and 300WSM (along with a a 325WSM). But their is just something about what is probably the most popular of all the 300 Magnums. Thanks for sharing!

[@falba1492]

You’ll get the same velocities out of the 300 WSM, with about 3 to 4 grains less powder. Just a tad bit less recoil.

[@oncall21]

@@falba1492 agreed. I've been a huge fan of the 300WSM since it came out almost 20 years ago now. Prio to that I was a 300 Win Mag die hard. I love the shorter. lighter rifles that 300WSM come in. The Tikka T3X seems the logical hunting rifle in 300 Win Mag. It has the one size length receiver along with other features that I like in the light weight Tikka.

[@nmelkhunter1]

@@falba1492 You are correct and I really like the cartridge. However, you will pay a premium for the brass. Take care and best of the luck in the field.

[@falba1492]

@@nmelkhunter1 - Yes, the brass is more expensive, but when you reload 300 H&H, everything everything else seems cheap lol. The 300 Win Mag is my least favorite of all the 300 magnums.

[@nmelkhunter1]

@@falba1492 Can’t disagree with the brass on the H&H.

[@derekedgley5074]

Another great video from Ron who tells it like it is. IMHO the 300Win Mag is certainly the ubiquitous round for African plains game and cartridges are available most anywhere

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks Derek.

[@whelenhunter4469]

When I was looking for a rifle bigger then my .270 Win. I studied others mostly 30-06, 7mm Rem. Mag and .300 Win. Mag., these three being the most popular and easiest to get ammo and reloading components for. I liked the numbers of the 300 Win. Mag. better then the others. I talk with other hunters mostly guys much older then me, talked with them about what they used and had used and what some of their family and friends used and what results they had had and seen the others have. Before I bought my .300 Win. Mag. I witnessed a mule deer shot with a 7mm Rem. Mag. and was not impressed. My first game animal with my 300 was a cow elk, the guy I was hunting with was using a 7mm mag. that he had been using for years and he was a good shot and a good hunter. We both got are elk but I'm glade I went with the 300. Another friend of mine went from the 270 to the 300 as well, he had hunted with some guys for years that used the 7mm's and the 300's, after watching the elk of these other hunters had taken over the years he felt the 300 was a better step up over the 270 then the 7mm mag. was. The 7's are good but I like the 30's better.

[@HikeHuntHaul]

My #1 favorite! I was so happy when I saw this video finally Ron 😃👍🏻. Great cartridge and round. 😉 I would even contemplate taking it Alaskan brown bear hunting with a 220 grain bullet. Excellent all round cartridge. Great video and excellent content. #bringenoughgun

[@HikeHuntHaul]

I would also add that lighter 300 win mags that kick “are too light” in the barrel weight. These ultralight mountain rifles all kick hard because of their weight. I do own one 😉 and it does kick. You need to get used to it. None the less, the cartridge is effective and proven on game and target shooting. Jim Shockey had a great article a few years back on proper rifle weight. I think it was around @ least 7.5-8pounds to start for those that shy away from a mule kicker rifle. He’s right in my research; u less anyone has any more info 😃👍🏻 I have a Winchester model 70 and its around 9 lbs scoped. It’s a much gentler shooter and lightly recoils in 300 win mag. My point is rifle weight is everything. Even when sales men and women are trying to get you as light of gear as possible these days. Lighter for jacket, backpack, and/or camping gear; not your tool/rifle that completes the task. Just my opinion from research and wisdom. Great video as usual Ron! 😃👍🏻 also, I would load 220 grain bullets in my rifle but don’t got below 180. 180 grain is that sweet spot for 300 win mag; kinda like 130grain is for 270 Winchester 😃. Not every rifle is the same but I’ve had multiple 300 wins and they all loved 180 grain bullets in the end. Great video!

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks tnywragge. Col. T. Whelen had a lot to say about ideal rifle weight nearly 100 years ago. He was/is probably right but... a 6-pound ultralight might not be ideal for complete control and sustained fire, it remains a special purpose rifle that helps one reach that one sheep or goat or caribou and drop 1 to 3 shots on it quite precisely, usually off a pack. No, not the ideal all round rifle and application weight, but I've had decades of great success with ultralights.

[@adamshaw8214]

@@RonSpomerOutdoors richard mann will not stand for this.

[@backnine]

I started shooting 300 win mag about 1 year ago. I bought a custom hunting rifle from a hunting guide collection. Remington 700 base. The rifle weight was about 8 lbs. Very light. For hunting it is great. It had a composite stock and the barrel was tapered to a 9/16 thread. First time I shot it the recoil was bad. I put a custom mussel break and a limb saver butt pad. I can shoot this rifle as much as I want and have no affect on me. If you set the gun up right it will be a pleasure to shoot. If it is not comfortable to shoot you will start anticipating recoil and jerking the trigger. I use a 2lb trigger on my 300 win mags and 338 Lapua

[@msa4548]

I still prefer the 7mm. Very nice range you have.

[@lyzadavis543]

Been my favorite since I was 15 and got my first one..freakish accuracy tons of power and I vote it for the best all around.

[@timviering9559]

We love what you do with your knowledge and experience. Thank you for all that you share. Would having a 26" barrel over a 24" on a 300 wm do anything better for hunting in the open? I am needing to rebarrel my rem 700 I purchased in the early 80s.

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Two more inches of barrel might give you 60 fps, perhaps 100 fps tops. Weight that against the slight inconvenience of the longer tube for carrying, maneuvering, in and out of trucks, saddle scabbards, gun cases, etc.

[@mickeymouse9654]

As always Ron's videos are great and without too much editing completely honest and I love watching! If the barrel is shortened by two or maybe three inches, will the bullet lose a lot of speed, on the other hand we get a shorter barrel with better maneuverability, when hunting in the woods or in a closed blind it is easier to maneuver with a shorter rifle and we shoot 95% at distances less than 200 yards, does it matter if we lose that speed and energy and then do we need a 300 Winchester magnum caliber? If we make 30-06 out of him ?! I am convinced that the barrel on the magnums should remain 26 inches for the purpose of burning gunpowder and develop additional energy for shooting at long distances, otherwise the manufacturers would not make the barrel in that length!

[@jacobstallcup8648]

@@RonSpomerOutdoors I have a mossberg patriot in a 22inch barrel and my dad has a 300 win mag with a 26inch barrel and my gun only shoots 44fps less

[@maccliff2115]

Great material. Thank you for posting. I sold my 02 Jeep Grand Cherokee for $1500 Bought a Savage Arms - chambered in 300 Win Mag! My favorite gun I own.

[@robertmagnstrom6088]

Looked like some pretty ”good” recoil! Good shooting, Ron!

[@MrBayrum56]

A muzzle break should minimize harsh recoil.

[@gregchambers6100]

Thank you professor for yet another extremely thorough but concise analysis. Being gracious in your disagreements with claims made by others demonstrates your earned confidence. I hope that someday you and I can have a disagreement so that I may learn something in such a gentlemanly and scholarly way.

[@benf8487]

Thank you for the presentation! Thinking about trading in my 308 win, Remington 700 for something with some more horsepower. I've got a few different calibers in mind and of course the 300 win mag is on the list. Thanks for some more data for me to consider.

[@martinschulz9381]

Right on, interesting. Everybody has their favorite caliber and a colorful testimonial to go with it.

[@falba1492]

First Norma, and then Winchester, were looking for a 300 H&H alternative in a standard long action. For what, to save a minuscule production cost on a magnum action? Winchester won the marketing hype, and a new cartridge came to be, which did not improve on the old design. All it accomplished was to fit in a smaller action. If you actually want to load 250 grain projectiles, the 300 H&H is actually faster. I load a 215 grain Berger Hybrid, at 2813 ft./s, with 69.5 grains of H4831SC (BTW, not the max load). No difference from the load Ron quoted using the 212 grain ELD-X. Where’s the improvement? There is non. I’d be willing to bet the 300 Win also requires more powder. The only advantage is for the manufacturer, not the consumer. Winchester got it right 40 years later with the 300 WSM, IMHO.

[@NCWoodlandRoamer]

Right on Frank. For any real hunter getting within 300 yards of game I can see no advantage of the magnums over the old standards, .270 and 30-06. Just burning more powder and carrying around heavier rifles for no real reason.

[@garydaddario6377]

Great vids Ron. I've had both the 300wsm and the 300wm. My favorite by far is the 300wm. I have loads for 168, 175,180 and 220 grain bullets all shooting under 1 MOA and the 220 Sierra match king under 1/2 MOA. Very enjoyable to shoot at 13 pounds but I won't be humping it thru the mountains any time soon. Keep up the good work.

[@haroldenglish943]

Thank you for negative input against unethical shooting of game animals. Long distance shooting requires limited skill sets. Hunting requires multiple skill sets. I call distance shooting of game animals unethical, lazy methods of legal take.

[@abaachi13]

Hello Ron, I'm a huge fan... Last week I went on a hunting trip in Arizona. I bagged a 700 pound cow elk with my Model 70 chambered in 300 WinMag. It was about 150 yards away, and I used 180 grain Hornady Outfitter ammo. And you are indeed correct: I didn't feel any recoil when I shot it; but I do feel it when I'm shooting at the range. 😄

[@RH-xr8ms]

Yeah Erex,,, I know what you mean !!!Shoot an Elk, or a Bear with the 300 Win Mag and there is NO felt recoil. BUT,,,,,,,paper plates just naturally kick the hell out of us !!!

[@abaachi13]

@@RH-xr8ms I wonder if they're putting some strange chemicals in the paper that enhances recoil. 🤣

[@RH-xr8ms]

@@abaachi13 ,,,I don't know,,,,,you may be on to something !!

[@ameliamccombs4313]

Ron I love your videos. You do a great service. I just wanted to say that I think the 300 H&H is underrated. If you really dig into the load data you will find that the 300 H&H is only ever a hair behind the 300 win mag in velocity. Possibly not enough to make a significant difference. And while you have the disadvantage of a longer action, the 300 H&H somehow does the same job as the 300 win with less recoil. I have my grandfathers old 300 H&H in a pre 64 model 70, and I love it to death. I was hesitant to even shoot it because I knew I was no fan of 300 Win mag recoil, but the 300 H&H was surprisingly comfortable to shoot.

[@debi5292]

The 300 H&H also feeds much more smoothly. The M70 will feed empty H&H casings. Plus, you get 4 in the magazine instead of 3. In hunting dangerous game, a big deal.

[@cacinaz8802]

Ron, you hit a homer this time. Thank you. My 300WM is just about built and I'm already planning for the 7RM because of you (don't tell my wife). I also thought to use the 150 gr. in the 300WM for lighter game. I especially like how you provided the MPBRs for a 6 inch target. Basically at 300 yards just put the cross hairs a couple of inches high and you don't need to fool around with the turrets. This is what most hunters do anyway. Lastly, the recoil figures are for an 8 pound rifle. A lot of rifles with scopes for longer ranges are weighing closer to 9 (or slightly more) pounds. The felt recoil will be less (okay not much less but enough to prevent crutches later in life LOL).

[@davidfornkahl8374]

I bought a Browning Gold Medallian A- bolt years ago in .300 win magnum. I use Remington 180 gr. Corelokt ammo. It is very accurate. I have shot black bears, Elk, mule deer, whitetail, antelope and coyote with it and nothing has moved out of its tracks after being shot. In fairness, the 6x6 bull was shot in the neck at 50 yds. A 30)30 would have dropped it. I have had people tell me I should use a better bullet. I'm like what don't you understand about an animal just dropping dead after being shot??? Great video!

[@aarondhermanson]

I got a B-14 HMR in 300wm and my brother has a Remington 700 in 7mm rem mag. Both are amazing guns.

[@trevorbrixton5195]

I wanted to get a wilderness terrain, but no one around here has a Bergara (prairies of Canada). Are the rifles as good as I read?

[@dustinpauley3786]

Hi Ron. 30'06 guy for all my life. After watching your channel for a while, as well as a few other guys presenting the numbers on youtube and elsewhere, I think maybe I'm becoming a 7mm Rem Mag convert. All that remains is to select a good rifle chambered in 7mm Rem Mag. Savage's ultralight is being chambered in both 280AI and 28 Nos, but no 7mm Rem Mag. Pity. Oh, btw, great video as always. Very informative and great fun. Thanks!

[@RonSpomerOutdoors]

Thanks Kenth.

[@Blitzkrieg_Wolf]

Having recently purchased a Savage Arms 110 Apex Hunter XP chambered in .300 Win Mag, this video is really informative of the advantages that the cartridge provides. Reloading WM is a great option as it gives you a more versatile range of loads to use for different applications (i.e. medium game, big game, precision shooting, long distance competitions, etc.).

[@stevenquintero2794]

Would you recommend that rifle

[@Blitzkrieg_Wolf]

@@stevenquintero2794 yes, though I would advise you to replace the scope with something from the Diamondback line of Vortex or an equal scope from another manufacturer, it does the job but has a chance to come out of the box misaligned/canted to one side (nothing some careful adjustment and zeroing couldn't fix).

[@stevenquintero2794]

@@Blitzkrieg_Wolf Thank you for your feedback I am going to get the Apex Storm in 300 mag it comes with vortex mounted ...did yours have Bushnell...I have been shooting 7 mag in a Ruger Mk 11 for past 18 years ...very pricey these days My 26 Year old son is about to get 110 Apex Storm as a birthday gift ...I hope he gets excited as I already am!!!!!

[@Blitzkrieg_Wolf]

@@stevenquintero2794 mine came with a Vortex crossfire 3-9x40mm

[@timbell7893]

RSO is the best source on the internet and KZbin about rifles and rifle ammo. I believe no one else on the planet knows as much as he does about rifles. Alway enjoy your videos.