35.23 I will take that off you... crown court + county court maidstone

[@eliz9369]

Great work. Thanks KA.

[@darrylkennedy2125]

Their next job will be a petrol station guard.

[@markhamilton9834]

Fu*king fire guard,,,🤣👍🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@Marius_vanderLubbe]

Just another bunch of liars and fantasists.

[@johngreen6191]

What a lousy job that is for grown men!!

[@darrylkennedy2125]

One of em wasn't even English.

[@grahambunton377]

They just make up the rules as they go along.

[@TonyDawnsurfer]

They always talking BS because it baffles brains.😂

[@oliamit]

👍Judge, Jury and Executioners

[@retroclickmedia4422]

Last time I read the HASAWA I must have nmissed the photography chapter

[@TheSadButMadLad]

You have to film as much as you like from the blards for public safety. Are the security so stupid they don't realise that filming from anywhere doesn't change anything to do with safety because of zoom lenses.

[@bartonseagrave9605]

If a Film Star was in Court there would be hundreds of cameras.

[@Billzloveschelsea]

It’s just shocking how uneducated these guards are loool

[@krystalbowes5855]

Another foreigner doesn't know what he is talking about!!

[@daviddyson8851]

I’m sick of seeing foreigners telling people what they can and can’t do

[@BABYWOLF--1966]

IN MY COUNTRY ENGLAND 🇬🇧

[@fredfoto7362]

A very unprofessional approach and with their hands in their pockets. As I read it, they may be quoting you that the Crown Court is private property with public access as this is a separate issue to the Criminal Justice Act 1925, Section 41?!

[@thankyoudriver4219]

The beardy guy was polite and reasonable.

[@colinlawless5654]

Security guards need reviewing. SIA seems clueless to monitor the guards. Security always seem scuffy unprofessional and have little knowledge of the law.

[@cgisme]

Rule or law?

[@kevinsancto1574]

Do they not think I am being filmed if I make a threat I could be sacked or worse public order. Are these not supposed to act accordingly when in public and in a official capacity. Where are the sia badges why are they not displaying them as that is against the law. Rules are not law unless a Acct or common law is in place.

[@clivesmith2886]

Poor security yet again , clueless unprofessional as usual stay safe retired lifeboatman

[@TheTony111111]

I do enjoy watching your videos but you need to edit them. IE cut out all the annoying camera shake.

[@wjrs5]

He’s trespassing on their property and they have their rules. They can use reasonable force to remove him.

[@rongt859]

Just put a sign at the bollards , its that easy , other wise its just a load of bollards

[@johnancill7397]

Yet again they cannot quote a law so how is it lawful with what he says , what about outside the old bailey?

[@TheBrawlBox]

I think the poor guys need a bit of help; it's likely they are trying to articulate Criminal Justice Act Section 41 (nothing to do with terrorism) which has a rather grey area tha extends the restriction to the precinct 41(F4C)-that is likely why the guards (who ought to be able to quote every line of one important and relatively short section and to throw in some case law) have been instructed to direct photographers beyond the bollards outside the precinct. Yet, you are right I don't see what difference it makes if the odd photographer is roaming within a reasonable distance inside the precinct. One can only presume that unscrupulous paparazzi style journalists have in the past behaved badly by swarming the doors and turning trials into carnivals. But who knows? P.I.N.A.C. Don't mess with Admiral H 👍✔

[@TheSadButMadLad]

And section 41 makes it a crime to record someone involved in a court case. Security are never involved so can be recorded without issue

[@daytona1212]

These muppets make it up as they go along. Their policy isn't law. But always ask them to show the policy or rules, and don't take their word for it. And it's publicly accessable, so you can be there.

[@secretfacekid8920]

Wow non Anglo Saxon security guards

[@MadPaperPeople]

say you are documenting the lack of disabled access ....

[@nokianige]

And the walk of shame good bye

[@elimercel1091]

Talking a lot of bollards there!

[@moonpawooe7134]

They are talking ballards

[@silentwitness247]

Do they all play pocket billiards?

[@oldseadogcb3130]

🤣I have never heard so much BS in all my life! Should have challenged his "make believe" rules and just carried on walking about filming! Courts exterior grounds same as police grounds, fire brigade grounds etc etc are paid for by the taxpayers of the UK and thereby you have the right to walkabout and film, unless their is a physical barrier with signage saying otherwise!✌

[@Stuart_George]

Court exterior grounds do have legislation concerning photography. People (including auditors) have been charged and fined for taking photos outside courts. Just saying bear that in mind.

[@IN_THIS_DAY_AND_AGE]

​​@Stuart George Section 41 of the Criminal Justice Act 1925 covers photography in the "precincts of a court." I saw a video of an auditor filming a court building. I can't remember who it was or where. He was in a pedestrianised area and crossed over the line, marking the boundary of the Court. They had him arrested.

[@Stuart_George]

@@IN_THIS_DAY_AND_AGE Yep. This is the legislation used to charge a very famous and popular auditor a few years ago.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

They can still use reasonable force to remove you.

[@kenthall319]

Laurel n Hardy?

[@peterwilliams6956]

Bunch of muppets as you can zoom in very easily

[@allyup3404]

Addressing members of public whilst working with their hands in their pockets. Very unprofessional.

[@owenoneill7210]

Not allowed

[@newsnownorthampton]

You need not move ,that's a public right of way ,I would have stayed and told them to do one

[@tomalex4806]

Its still their property and if you refuse to move they can just move you physically anyway. Access can be revoked without reason at anytime

[@anuvabastidanakist2437]

I am outside so go away I can see it in public I can film it in public and they politely asked you to leave you shouldve politely said I am disinclined to aquiesse to your request

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

Just be careful; it’s an offence to film anyone entering or leaving the precincts that has been involved in a case.

[@TheBrawlBox]

Yes, it's all in Section 41 👍

[@RonSeymour1]

Apart from staff that would be everyone going in and out and how do you know whether they are involved in a case? I am not saying that you are incorrect but can you quote the source, not just section 41? Section 41 in what paper?

[@TheBrawlBox]

@@RonSeymour1 CJA 1925-pointed out in an earlier comment; in most instances, it is unlikely that one would know who is involved in a case.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

@@RonSeymour1 yes, it’s very badly worded and vague. It includes the “precincts” of the court, which is impossible to define. It includes anyone “involved in” a case. The ushers? The clerk? That said, the fine is only £50 or so.

[@MrAndrewFarrow]

@@TheBrawlBox but it is one of those absolute offences. There is no defence of reasonableness.

[@jbc1829]

What a load of bollards 🤣 🤣 he was very polite to be fair but they both looked unprofessional especially the tattoos

[@stuartryan3508]

What they doing buy one get one free on tattoos!

[@johnthreadgold7846]

you can not make it up can you