3BM26 APFSDS vs Abrams lower glacis (SST)

[@KeshabLora]

The driver becomes red

[@dudejunior1995]

Mom can we have Ansys? No we have the Ansys at home. Ansys at home:

[@RedVRCC]

*"YES A HIT!"*

[@rayotoxi1509]

3BM26 is modeled wrong dont know if SST allows for a second penetrator core inside the dart but 3BM26 has a 2nd penetrator core imbeded into the dart

[@ChloeGabrielleMercado]

apcr ahhahhhh fsds

[@MegaUnderscore]

What did you model the material for that rear plate? Paper or something?

[@galacticdragon9841]

looks to all be rock, so it is extremely brittle and it will break off super easily.

[@HassanAchieved]

​@@galacticdragon9841more like styrofoam

[@SpaceSimulationToolkit]

cool

[@anlamxuan7288]

What is the name of that music?

[@Dan1el_guy]

Clair de Lune

[@anlamxuan7288]

Thank

[@HassanAchieved]

No Russian bias was used in this video

[@Plaer1]

Shrapnel

[@irgendeintyp1171]

fax

[@yatsu9437]

Preludio ....

[@Someguy12796]

From kremlin incorporated 😂😂😂😂 yeah this is utter bs. Iraqi t72s using 3bm42 couldnt even pen the lower glacis or get even close according to actual tankers. But ok bucko

[@teamsenia8497]

Я в шоке, 3БМ26 пробивает НЛД абрамса 💀

[@GodKitty677]

It didn't penetrate but it's a really bad effect on the plate. The large metal fragments will kill the crew. Looks worse than a penetration.

[@michigancube4240]

@@GodKitty677 it penetrated since SST is horrible at simulating metal strength it seems, that backplate irl is 100mm of RHA, a penetrator that is reduced to a dozen chunks of metal isnt going to scratch the first few mm let alone shatter the plate. Not enough energy.

[@cay7809]

this is prolly base m1 armor

[@teamsenia8497]

@@cay7809 yea but this is 3BM26 not even 3BM42

[@quan-uo5ws]

@@michigancube4240 same goes for the penetrator though, it also wouldnt shatter itself so quickly. I do think that 3BM26 would penetrate the lower front plate of an abrams, it has a pretty unique design, the turret was the more well protected place that might stop the round.