4 Khilafah of Muawiyah : Objections Against Muawiyah

4 Khilafah of Muawiyah : Objections Against Muawiyah
👉 If you love this video, please like and share it.
👉 Don't forget to subscribe to this channel for more update.
👉 Subscribe now: bit.ly/2vWqOaZ
💢💢 Watch our other video:
💟 Is The Bible The Word Of God?: • Is The Bible The Word ...
💟 Jummah Khutbah: What is the purpose of life?: • What is the purpose of...
💟 Fiqh of Fasting 1: • 38 Sharh Akhsar al-Muk...
💢💢 Stay with us:
💟 Facebook: / masjidribat
💟 Google Plus: plus.google.com/1114869460949...
💟 Personal Website: www.masjidribat.com/
💟 Email: [e-mail]
#UthmanIbnFarooq #Islamicclasses #MasjidRibat
Thank you for watching this video, click the "SUBSCRIBE" button for stay connected with this channel.
Subscription Link: bit.ly/2vWqOaZ

[@mwinyimohamed9746]

I like your video's yaa Shaykh may Allah give you long life so that you keep educating ummah. جزاك الله خيرا

[@MasjidRibat]

وإياكم

[@MasjidRibat]

آمين

[@TheEmperorsBlade]

What a great lesson. Barakallah.

[@sambg3807]

Assalmalikum Sheikh, just saw your video just wana ask you . do you have any sahee evidence that Hujar bin adee was Sahabhee

[@Laparganjikhn]

I love you Sheikh but I absolutely do not agree with you on this issue of Khilafat and Kingship. There are hadith in Bukhari and Muslim which you didn’t mention and which go against Banu Ummaya. Muawiya RA is under the spotlight and rightly so. His Ijtahad was absolutely wrong. He didn’t give the decision to the shura of the remaining sahabas. He appointed his son which is absolutely against Islam. Allah knows best. But we love Muawiya RA for being a Sahabi of Rasoolullah SAWW. Ali RA and Muawiya RA did have issues and Ali RA never forgave Muawiya RA and left the issue to Allah at the day of judgement.

[@reptilespit4433]

Yazeed was a better candidate for khalifat than Hussan? Muawiya appointed his son as a kahkifa to unite umma even though rule by liniage isn't allowed? Hassan gave up on khilafat to unite umma in favour of Muawia even though he was better suited to be a khalifa? I'm listening to this for the first time ever, I need more reseach. Something doesn't srack up right. I love Seikh too

[@safiyayuichi6553]

@@reptilespit4433 Hassan did agree to give rule to Mu'awiyah on the condition that he becomes Caliph after, as Mu'awiyah was an old man by then. Unfortunately hassan passed away before Mu'awiyah. Mu'awiyah had been fighting alongside Yazid and they both were scoring victories in Jihad against the byzantine, maybe this deluded Mu'awiyah into thinking yazid would be a good candidate for caliphate. If the Caliph wants to choose a successor they must be approved by shura or counselling, and around 60-80 sahabah agreed to pledge allegiance to yazid, however history disputes whether they were forced to or not

[@anonymoususer8286]

Stop speaking ill of any of the sahabah. The prophet clearly prohibit this in many narrations. This mindset is what led to the creation of misguided sects. There is no animosity between Ali and Muawiya in the authentic narrations. This is a lie fabricated by the rafidha backed up by weak and fabricated narrations. Also a Khalifa appointing a successor has been done before. Abu Bakr appointing Umar as an example. So Muawiya appointing Yazid is in accordance to the righteous predecessors. Wether he is right or wrong in the eyes of Allah, Allah knows best. Either way, Muawiya still gets the rewards of trying his best.

[@michaeliskandar8236]

@@anonymoususer8286 even the most staunchest of muawiya supporters will admit to the animosity between the two. they took each other to war, he cursed ali from the pulpits, he killed his supporters, the letters between the two show animosity...... what more do you want to deem two people enemies?

[@azlanisa6773]

Provide reference of last para please.

[@officialunifiedbullbreedre4035]

that Ibn `Abbas told him and `Ali bin `Abdullah to go to Abu Sa`id and listen to some of his narrations; So they both went (and saw) Abu Sa`id and his brother irrigating a garden belonging to them. When he saw them, he came up to them and sat down with his legs drawn up and wrapped in his garment and said, "(During the construction of the mosque of the Prophet) we carried the adobe of the mosque, one brick at a time while `Ammar used to carry two at a time. The Prophet (ﷺ) passed by `Ammar and removed the dust off his head and said, "May Allah be merciful to `Ammar. He will be killed by a rebellious aggressive group. `Ammar will invite them to (obey) Allah and they will invite him to the (Hell) fire."

[@lurvetrain]

Jazaka Allahu khayran. I have always shied away from this topic in the past as every version presented a villain. These topics were mere ploys for Rawafidah to recruit. Allahuma barek feek for this and other topics.

[@lulume8121]

رايت فاتيت والان استمع اليك ياشيخنا. جزاك الله خير

[@muizzmohamad5256]

Subhanallah. Whats with these slander against muawiyah. Its so sad

[@RaabiaKitty]

Muawiyah only knew how to kill, no philosophy, no manners etc.

[@Mmm-xw8dx]

جزاك الله خيرا

[@metinmetin1246]

Amazes me to see how the same person can be so logical and straightforward with his arguments when it comes to Dawah with the non-Muslims. And then turning around speaking about inter-islamic topics and be so unlogical and childish. I am 99% sure he does not believe himself what he is saying. He just says it because he relies on his ummayad ulama and clings to these arguments like clinging on a small thread. Any historian with a bachelors degree analyzing the sources can smell these ummayad riwayat trying to portray muawiya and his followers in a good light. Later ummayad scholars even going further and distorting an even inventing riwayat to make it look like Muawiya had good relations with al-Hassan.

[@anonymoususer8286]

It’s clear you come here to cause problems, you don’t pay attention to the lecture. You provide no proofs on your claims at all. Historians with Bachelors? You mean historians who studied under the supervision of orientalists that takes any proof that support their claim for their feeble attempt trying to dismantle this pure religion of Islam regardless of authenticity? Also, who are these Ummayad Scholars are you talking about?

[@md.shahadathossain8880]

You can prove him wrong with dalil....he spoke from authentic narrations....you should too

[@MuhammadAli-jd4hs]

Thats right. Shayk is literally taking part hadeeth and skipping a part of it just to prove his point

[@user-lx8tj4co8d]

Can anyone plz explain me is the hadeeth of sahih Bukhari #2812 zaeef?

[@MrEdits-yw3bp]

It’s saheeh

[@rinopw4262]

How ironic now Sham is full of people who supports Hussein r.a.

[@muhammadadnan3333]

Don't you think if Muawaya(R.A) wanted to save ummah from dividing up he should have appointed a 3rd person as khalifa. Not Hazrat Husayn(R.A) nor Yazid. Wasn't there a single person more deserving? I hear you SH Uthman but my heart doesn't agree with this.

[@shehzilmoid8592]

You must accept the evidence provided. It is shaitan tricking u from not accepting

[@epicworld5238]

@@shehzilmoid8592 how

[@lailakurji1350]

What did you expect from Muawiya LA .HE was the son of Honda sliver eater?

[@hoslabara2703]

Abdullah ibne zubair also a third options.

[@md.shahadathossain8880]

Didn't you hear that people of as sham wanted someone from banu umayya badly.....and yezid wasn’t a bad person up until then and was loved and had good reputation among people?

[@md.shahadathossain8880]

To be confirm about muawiya(ra)....i rely on these facts....prophet(pbuh) was pleased of him...he was one of prophet's (pbuh) writer....abu bakr(ra) was pleased with him...umar(ra) was pleased with him....uthman(ra) was pleased with him... ali(ra) was misunderstood not only by muawiya (ra) but also by great Companions like ayisha(ra),talha(ra),jubair(ra)

[@qazimudasir5439]

Astaghfirullah brother... There is a consensus of umma that maula Ali (عليه السلام) was correct in every single thing.... Just read ahadees don't listen to people if you have faith......

[@qazimudasir5439]

You don't know about, how Muawiya (رضي الله عنه) became writer of prophet Muhammad ﷺ first know about that....

[@Wakobear.]

Ustaadh, you said that Muawiyyah said none of those hwo umar chose as shura remained. But in previous lessons you said ibn umar was also a part of the shura, but as an advisor. So wouldn't ibn umar be the most applicable? جزاكم الله خيرا

[@abuyaqubbeneficialplaylist6623]

Asalām-Alaykum. If I remember correctly, Umar bin Al-Khattāb denied for his son to be amongst the candidates to become the Khalīfa. He didn't wanted his son to become the Khalīfa so he assigned him as an advisor. As the others present were in the Shūra (consultation), ibn Umar was only an advisor and thus not amongst them as a candidate. Allāhu Wā'lam, Allāh Knows and I know not. You can re-view the previous videos regarding Sheikh Uthmān explaining this.

[@raulislam7189]

‏السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته Its v well known that ibn 'Umar didnt want anything to do with politics at all, he used to live a life of zuhd, during the khalifa of 'Uthman (if im not mistaken) 'Uthman ‎رضي الله عنه came to ibn 'Umar to give him a role as a governer but ibn 'Umar refused many many times

[@TruthFound]

What is the meaning of Radiyanhu? Or is that just a miss-pronunciation?

[@usd00]

Its a "fast-pronunciation"

[@AbuZimz]

If only you knew how long I have been waiting for lectures on Islamic history post the 4 caliphs, baaraka Allahu feek! If you are so kind to answer a couple of questions dear sheikh: 1: doesnt the khalifah have to be from Quraish? 2: what is the ruling on me playing dice games with my small kids? The dice dont even have numbers, rather colors but obviously we still have to toss the dice and play according to the colour we dice. I ask Allah to give you the best in this life and the hereafter

[@abuyaqubbeneficialplaylist6623]

Asalām-Alaykum. 1. The Khalīfa does not has to be from the tribal lineage of the Quraish, there are certain conditions applied in Sharī'ah for the selection of the new Khālīfa. 2. It is prohibited and impermissible to play dice with or without betting. We can see this strictly being prohibited from amongst the Sahāba and even by the mother of the believers, A'ishā. Abdullāh ibn 'Amr ibn al-'As said: _"Someone who plays dice for a bet is like a person who eats pig meat. Someone who plays it without betting is like someone who washes his hands in pig's blood."_ Source: Al-Adab Al-Mufrad, authenticated by Sheikh Albānī. Abdullāh is the son of Amr bin Al-A'as, a famous and a well known Sahābī, praised by the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ. It is also mentioned in the Muwatta of Imām Mālik that the honoured and pious A'ishā had some people who lived in a room of her house, they had with them dice. She sent a message to them that if they don't remove the dices, they will be removed from the house. Finally to mention, in the Muwatta of Imām Mālik, Abdullāh bin Umar, the son of the beloved and righteous companion of Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, Umar bin Al-Khattāb. He beat his family member upon seeing that he had a dice and he destroyed the dice.

[@abuyaqubbeneficialplaylist6623]

I will also leave one last Hadīth, the words of the Messenger of Allāh ﷺ upon the playing of dice, it is in the Muwatta of Imām Mālik. The Muwatta of Imām Mālik has only authentic Ahadīth, all of them verified. Narrated Abū Mūsa Al-Ash'arī: _"The Messenger of Allāh ﷺ said: 'Whoever plays games of dice has disobeyed Allāh and His Messenger ﷺ.'_

[@mohammedsohail7005]

Does anyone have any work in refuting objections against sayyiduna mu'awiyah

[@aflalhussain3881]

Why was Abdullah ibn abu bakr wrong?How did abdullah ibn bakr die???

[@abuyaqubbeneficialplaylist6623]

Asalām-Alaykum. He was correct in regards to the Sunnāh of Abū Bakr and Umar bin Al-Khattāb being that the son of Khalīfa will not be chosen as this was an unjust practice, committed by the disbelievers. However, the decision of Mu'āwiyā of the selection of his son as the next Khalīfa was not based upon this, it was due to prevent the Ummah from dividing from rebellious acts as the entirety of the Ummah were delighted and had no issues with Mu'āwiyā or his son Yazīd.

[@aflalhussain3881]

@@abuyaqubbeneficialplaylist6623 wa alaikum salam u say the entirty of ummah was delighted with yazid and muawiya can u back this up with some evidence

[@abuyaqubbeneficialplaylist6623]

@@aflalhussain3881 Yes, watch the series of the Khilāfah of Mu'āwiyā ibn Abi Sufyān, lectured by Sheikh Uthmān bin Fārooq in this channel, you can find the playlist. I would also want to correct my statement, not the entirety but almost everyone, the majority except three pious men. Ibn Abū Bakr, Hussein ibn A'lī and Abdullāh bin Zūbayr. Also as for the conflicts which occured in the rule of Yazīd ibn Mu'āwiyā, this is a separate issue.

[@shaan2411]

حَدَّثَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ عُثْمَانَ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ الْحِمْصِيُّ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏حَدَّثَنَا بَقِيَّةُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏عَنْ بَحِيرٍ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏عَنْ خَالِدٍ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ وَفَدَ الْمِقْدَامُ بْنُ مَعْدِ يكَرِبَ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏وَعَمْرُو بْنُ الْأَسْوَدِ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏وَرَجُلٌ مِنْ بَنِي أَسَدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ قِنَّسْرِينَ إِلَى مُعَاوِيَةَ بْنِ أَبِي سُفْيَانَ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَقَالَ مُعَاوِيَةُ لِلْمِقْدَامِ أَعَلِمْتَ أَنَّ الْحَسَنَ بْنَ عَلِيٍّ تُوُفِّيَ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَرَجَّعَ الْمِقْدَامُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَقَالَ لَهُ رَجُلٌ:‏‏‏‏ أَتَرَاهَا مُصِيبَةً ؟ قَالَ لَهُ:‏‏‏‏ وَلِمَ لَا أَرَاهَا مُصِيبَةً وَقَدْ وَضَعَهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ فِي حِجْرِهِ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَقَالَ:‏‏‏‏ هَذَا مِنِّي، ‏‏‏‏‏‏وَحُسَيْنٌ مِنْ عَلِيٍّ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَقَالَ الْأَسَدِيُّ:‏‏‏‏ جَمْرَةٌ أَطْفَأَهَا اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ فَقَالَ الْمِقْدَامُ:‏‏‏‏ أَمَّا أَنَا فَلَا أَبْرَحُ الْيَوْمَ حَتَّى أُغَيِّظَكَ وَأُسْمِعَكَ مَا تَكْرَهُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏ثُمَّ قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ يَا مُعَاوِيَةُ إِنَّ أَنَا صَدَقْتُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَصَدِّقْنِي وَإِنْ أَنَا كَذَبْتُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَكَذِّبْنِي، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ أَفْعَلُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ فَأَنْشُدُكَ بِاللَّهِ هَلْ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَهَى عَنْ لُبْسِ الذَّهَبِ ؟ قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ نَعَمْ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ فَأَنْشُدُكَ بِاللَّهِ هَلْ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَهَى عَنْ لُبْسِ الْحَرِيرِ ؟ قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ نَعَمْ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ فَأَنْشُدُكَ بِاللَّهِ هَلْ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صَلَّى اللَّهُ عَلَيْهِ وَسَلَّمَ نَهَى عَنْ لُبْسِ جُلُودِ السِّبَاعِ وَالرُّكُوبِ عَلَيْهَا ؟ قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ نَعَمْ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ فَوَاللَّهِ لَقَدْ رَأَيْتُ هَذَا كُلَّهُ فِي بَيْتِكَ يَا مُعَاوِيَةُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَقَالَ مُعَاوِيَةُ:‏‏‏‏ قَدْ عَلِمْتُ أَنِّي لَنْ أَنْجُوَ مِنْكَ يَا مِقْدَامُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏قَالَ خَالِدٌ:‏‏‏‏ فَأَمَرَ لَهُ مُعَاوِيَةُ بِمَا لَمْ يَأْمُرْ لِصَاحِبَيْهِ وَفَرَضَ لِابْنِهِ فِي الْمِائَتَيْنِ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَفَرَّقَهَا الْمِقْدَامُ فِي أَصْحَابِهِ قَالَ:‏‏‏‏ وَلَمْ يُعْطِ الْأَسَدِيُّ أَحَدًا شَيْئًا مِمَّا أَخَذَ فَبَلَغَ ذَلِكَ مُعَاوِيَةُ، ‏‏‏‏‏‏فَقَالَ:‏‏‏‏ أَمَّا الْمِقْدَامُ فَرَجُلٌ كَرِيمٌ بَسَطَ يَدَهُ وَأَمَّا الْأَسَدِيُّ فَرَجُلٌ حَسَنُ الْإِمْسَاكِ لِشَيْئِهِ . Khalid said: Al-Miqdam ibn Madikarib and a man of Banu Asad from the people of Qinnisrin went to Muawiyah ibn Abu Sufyan. Muawiyah said to al-Miqdam: Do you know that al-Hasan ibn Ali has died? Al-Miqdam recited the Quranic verse We belong to Allah and to Him we shall return. Muawiyah asked him: Do you think it a calamity? He replied: Why should I not consider it a calamity when it is a fact that the Messenger of Allah صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم used to take him on his lap, saying: This belongs to me and Husayn belongs to Ali? The man of Banu Asad said: (He was) a live coal which Allah has extinguished. Al-Miqdam said: Today I shall continue to make you angry and make you hear what you dislike. He then said: Muawiyah, if I speak the truth, declare me true, and if I tell a lie, declare me false. He said: Do so. He said: I adjure you by Allah, did you hear the Messenger of Allah صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم forbidding use to wear gold? He replied: Yes. He said: I adjure you by Allah, do you know that the Messenger of Allah صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم prohibited the wearing of silk? He replied: Yes. He said: I adjure you by Allah, do you know that the Messenger of Allah صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم prohibited the wearing of the skins of beasts of prey and riding on them? He said: Yes. He said: I swear by Allah, I saw all this in your house, O Muawiyah. Muawiyah said: I know that I cannot be saved from you, O Miqdam. Khalid said: Muawiyah then ordered to give him what he did not order to give to his two companions, and gave a stipend of two hundred (dirhams) to his son. Al-Miqdam then divided it among his companions, and the man of Banu Asad did not give anything to anyone from the property he received. When Muawiyah was informed about it, he said: Al-Miqdam is a generous man; he has an open hand (for generosity). The man of Banu Asad withholds his things in a good manner. Sunnan e Abu Dawood#4131 Status: صحیح Muslim 4776 ....................He who swears allegiance to a Caliph should give him the piedge of his hand and the sincerity of his heart (i. e. submit to him both outwardly as well as inwardly). He should obey him to the best of his capacity. It another man comes forward (as a claimant to Caliphate), disputing his authority, they (the Muslims) should behead the latter. The narrator says: I came close to him ('Abdullah b. 'Amr b. al-'As) and said to him: Can you say on oath that you heard it from the Messenger of Allah ( ‌صلی ‌اللہ ‌علیہ ‌وسلم ‌ )? He pointed with his hands to his ears and his heart and said: My ears heard it and my mind retained it. I said to him: This cousin of yours, Mu'awiya, orders us to unjustly consume our wealth among ourselves and to kill one another, while Allah says: O ye who believe, do not consume your wealth among yourselves unjustly, unless it be trade based on mutual agreement, and do not kill yourselves. Verily, God is Merciful to you (iv. 29). The narrator says that (hearing this) Abdullah b. 'Amr b. al-As kept quiet for a while and then said: Obey him in so far as he is obedient to God; and diqobey him in matters involving disobedience to God. Bukhari 4108 ............Muawiya addressed the people saying, 'If anybody wants to say anything in this matter of the Caliphate, he should show up and not conceal himself, for we are more rightful to be a Caliph than he and his father. On that, Habib bin Masalama said (to Ibn `Umar), Why don't you reply to him (i.e. Muawiya)? `Abdullah bin `Umar said, I untied my garment that was going round my back and legs while I was sitting and was about to say, 'He who fought against you and against your father for the sake of Islam, is more rightful to be a Caliph,' but I was afraid that my statement might produce differences amongst the people and cause bloodshed, and my statement might be interpreted not as I intended. (So I kept quiet) remembering what Allah has prepared in the Gardens of Paradise (for those who are patient and prefer the Hereafter to this worldly life). Habib said, You did what kept you safe and secure (i.e. you were wise in doing so).

[@11hamma]

why did sheikh not even mention this

[@osaizzsomm2057]

I read the comments and their sum of people arguing... we should look scholars and knowledgeable people. we should not talk without knowledge be the student ...

[@AmeerMuawiyahAS]

The student of who?

[@mwinyimohamed9746]

Assalam aleykum warahmatullahi wabarakatuhu yaa Shaykh, in the chat of Iqaama there is no Maghrib""" "

[@RaRahGully]

Walaykum salaam warahmatullah wabarakatuh. Thats because maghreb time moves every day, so no set iqama time. so its 5 mins after sunset at Masjid Al Ribat. And as always, Allah swt knows best.

[@mwinyimohamed9746]

@@RaRahGully شكرأ جزيلاً الله أبرك بجوابك

[@WayOfJannah]

40:00 See how nice was Marwan bin Hakam was to a Sahabi: Narrated Yusuf bin Mahak: Marwan had been appointed as the governor of Hijaz by Muawiya. He delivered a sermon and mentioned Yazid bin Muawiya so that the people might take the oath of allegiance to him as the successor of his father (Muawiya). Then `Abdur Rahman bin Abu Bakr told him something whereupon Marwan ordered that he be arrested. But `Abdur-Rahman entered `Aisha's house and they could not arrest him. Marwan said, "It is he (`AbdurRahman) about whom Allah revealed this Verse:-- 'And the one who says to his parents: 'Fie on you! Do you hold out the promise to me..?'" On that, `Aisha said from behind a screen, "Allah did not reveal anything from the Qur'an about us except what was connected with the declaration of my innocence (of the slander). حَدَّثَنَا مُوسَى بْنُ إِسْمَاعِيلَ، حَدَّثَنَا أَبُو عَوَانَةَ، عَنْ أَبِي بِشْرٍ، عَنْ يُوسُفَ بْنِ مَاهَكَ، قَالَ كَانَ مَرْوَانُ عَلَى الْحِجَازِ اسْتَعْمَلَهُ مُعَاوِيَةُ، فَخَطَبَ فَجَعَلَ يَذْكُرُ يَزِيدَ بْنَ مُعَاوِيَةَ، لِكَىْ يُبَايِعَ لَهُ بَعْدَ أَبِيهِ، فَقَالَ لَهُ عَبْدُ الرَّحْمَنِ بْنُ أَبِي بَكْرٍ شَيْئًا، فَقَالَ خُذُوهُ‏.‏ فَدَخَلَ بَيْتَ عَائِشَةَ فَلَمْ يَقْدِرُوا ‏{‏عَلَيْهِ‏}‏ فَقَالَ مَرْوَانُ إِنَّ هَذَا الَّذِي أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فِيهِ ‏{‏وَالَّذِي قَالَ لِوَالِدَيْهِ أُفٍّ لَكُمَا أَتَعِدَانِنِي‏}‏‏.‏ فَقَالَتْ عَائِشَةُ مِنْ وَرَاءِ الْحِجَابِ مَا أَنْزَلَ اللَّهُ فِينَا شَيْئًا مِنَ الْقُرْآنِ إِلاَّ أَنَّ اللَّهَ أَنْزَلَ عُذْرِي‏.‏ Reference : Sahih al-Bukhari 4827In-book reference : Book 65, Hadith 349USC-MSA web (English) reference : Vol. 6, Book 60, Hadith 352 (deprecated numbering scheme)

[@AlifromSloughvsLBC]

This is so unfounded and unsubstantiated at 30:00 . It is tantamount to being nonsense in my view. Of cos Hussain (ra) had leadership qualities. It’s amazing the sheikh would appear to stick to the “salafi” narrative rather than being objective in his assessment and analysis from the original sources. Hussain (رضي الله عنه) had leadership qualities. To suggest otherwise is dumbfounded. I respect the sheikh for anyone who thinks I’m attacking him. The overwhelming leaning on excuses justifying this in itself indicative of the unfair bias narrative especially against Hassan & Hussain (رضي الله عنه).

[@Redery001]

How so? Being from good lineage does not automatically make you leader? The Shaykh point is valid, listen to it again. He is not saying Hussain r.a. was a bad leader or would've been, he is saying the ppl of Iraq would not accept bc he did not have history of being leader before.

[@safiyayuichi6553]

I dont remember Husayn RA having any political experience, could you say?

[@shaheensultana6755]

I always knew, our prophet SA said, Muawiyah's(RA) son will kill his grandson. That's why Muawiyah(RA) delayed his marriage. Is it true? Let me know, please.

[@MasjidRibat]

That is not true

[@officialunifiedbullbreedre4035]

Like you said it’s wrong for someone who rebels against the caliphate ? Then what about fighting the legitimate Khalifa Ali ? Which was the cause of the death of thousands of Muslims and divided the ummah in two.

[@ummfaizal]

58:30 😂 it's true, in Malaysia Wahabi preachers got paid from Saudi Embassy 😢

[@beardrn]

Mu'awiyah (رضي الله عنه) k liye, Rasool Allah (ﷺ) ki dil ❤️ ki dua. Sahih Muslim #6628 حضرت ابن عباس رضی اللہ عنہما سے روایت کی ، کہا : میں لڑکوں کے ساتھ کھیل رہا تھا کہ اچانک رسول اللہ ﷺ تشریف لے آئے ، میں دروازے کے پیچھے چھپ گیا ، کہا : آپ آئے اور میرے دونوں شانوں کے درمیان اپنے کھلے ہاتھ سے ہلکی سی ضرب لگائی ( مقصود پیار کا اظہار تھا ) اور فرمایا :’’ جاؤ ، میرے لیے معاویہ کو بلا لاؤ ۔‘‘ میں نے آپ سے آ کر کہا : وہ کھانا کھا رہے ہیں ۔ آپ نے دوبارہ مجھ سے فرمایا :’’ جاؤ ، معاویہ کو بلا لاؤ ۔‘‘ میں نے پھر آ کر کہا : وہ کھانا کھا رہے ہیں ، تو آپ نے فرمایا :’’ اللہ اس کا پیٹ نہ بھرے ۔‘‘ Status: صحیح

[@Danish_Khan_]

Shaukh, one question, it is not khilafah of muawiyah, it is malookiyat. Why are you portrayed it as khilafah ?

[@mck27]

Because he was accepted as Emir al muminin. And there is a ruling, if you reign over mekka and medina you can claim to be a Khalif like the ottomans later after conquering mekka and medina .

[@mnoorbhai]

He says Sahih haheeth ,..quote not just cherry pick your general comments creatong your own stories!!!

[@8heavyhchamp8]

7 minutes = yes its possible coz people send antrax,juju,drone or pay your shia to kill or cause harm but in not saying he did it for sure

[@bodanamusicproduction876]

May Allah guid us he says that Mohammad Ibn hanifiya praise yazeed which is not true this narration is not in any hadeeth book . This narration is in Al bidaya wal nihaya which is a tareekh book written by ibn kathir this narration is no sanad in it. Ibn kathir died in 774AH and he not tell the narrator of this narration on all of that he is telling the half of narration the full narration is Abdullah ibn mutti RA which is a companion he travel to meet yazid in sham their he sees that yazeed is a alcoholic person and miss salat most of time and when he returns to madina he tells to the people madina what he sees when this reech to Mohamad ibn hanifiya he says I also travel with yazeed but I don't see anything like you see than the ashab of Abdullah ibn mutti said to Mohamad ibn hanifiya that he just make you shaw that he was praying on time and follow sunnah but this is not true Abdullah ibn mutti spend more time than you with yazeed. For the shake of argument if you assume this narration is true than we take the call of a companion who is Abdullah ibn mutti here not from the Tabee who is Mohamad ibn hanifiya here. Look his fabrication and how he make up lies may Allah guid us all ameen🤲

[@irfan_saudagar2002]

I really like shekh uthman but i totally disagree with him he didn't even mentioned the hadiths in bukhari and Muslim that clearly mentions what muavia ra was doing. i think shikh knows the reality but what stopped him mentioning it.

[@rayhan4541]

Bukhari 2812

[@WayOfJannah]

50:00 THIS IS HOW MU'AWIYAH (RA) DID TAAZIYAH OF THE DEATH OF HASAN (RA) : Khalid said: Al-Miqdam ibn Ma'dikarib and a man of Banu Asad from the people of Qinnisrin went to Mu'awiyah ibn AbuSufyan. Mu'awiyah said to al-Miqdam: Do you know that al-Hasan ibn Ali has died? Al-Miqdam recited the Qur'anic verse "We belong to Allah and to Him we shall return." A man (i.e. Mu'awiyah bin Abi Sufyan) asked him: Do you think it a calamity? He replied: Why should I not consider it a calamity when it is a fact that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) used to take him on his lap, saying: This belongs to me and Husayn belongs to Ali? The man of Banu Asad said: (He was) a live coal which Allah has extinguished. Al-Miqdam said: Today I shall continue to make you angry and make you hear what you dislike. He then said: Mu'awiyah, if I speak the truth, declare me true, and if I tell a lie, declare me false. He said: Do so. He said: I adjure you by Allah, did you hear the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) forbidding use to wear gold? He replied: Yes. He said: I adjure you by Allah, do you know that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited the wearing of silk? He replied: Yes. He said: I adjure you by Allah, do you know that the Messenger of Allah (ﷺ) prohibited the wearing of the skins of beasts of prey and riding on them? He said: Yes. He said: I swear by Allah, I saw all this in your house, O Mu'awiyah. Mu'awiyah said: I know that I cannot be saved from you, O Miqdam. Khalid said: Mu'awiyah then ordered to give him what he did not order to give to his two companions, and gave a stipend of two hundred (dirhams) to his son. Al-Miqdam then divided it among his companions, and the man of Banu Asad did not give anything to anyone from the property he received. When Mu'awiyah was informed about it, he said: Al-Miqdam is a generous man; he has an open hand (for generosity). The man of Banu Asad withholds his things in a good manner. حَدَّثَنَا عَمْرُو بْنُ عُثْمَانَ بْنِ سَعِيدٍ الْحِمْصِيُّ، حَدَّثَنَا بَقِيَّةُ، عَنْ بَحِيرٍ، عَنْ خَالِدٍ، قَالَ وَفَدَ الْمِقْدَامُ بْنُ مَعْدِيكَرِبَ وَعَمْرُو بْنُ الأَسْوَدِ وَرَجُلٌ مِنْ بَنِي أَسَدٍ مِنْ أَهْلِ قِنَّسْرِينَ إِلَى مُعَاوِيَةَ بْنِ أَبِي سُفْيَانَ فَقَالَ مُعَاوِيَةُ لِلْمِقْدَامِ أَعَلِمْتَ أَنَّ الْحَسَنَ بْنَ عَلِيٍّ تُوُفِّيَ فَرَجَّعَ الْمِقْدَامُ فَقَالَ لَهُ رَجُلٌ أَتَرَاهَا مُصِيبَةً قَالَ لَهُ وَلِمَ لاَ أَرَاهَا مُصِيبَةً وَقَدْ وَضَعَهُ رَسُولُ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم فِي حِجْرِهِ فَقَالَ ‏ "‏ هَذَا مِنِّي وَحُسَيْنٌ مِنْ عَلِيٍّ ‏"‏ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ الأَسَدِيُّ جَمْرَةٌ أَطْفَأَهَا اللَّهُ عَزَّ وَجَلَّ ‏.‏ قَالَ فَقَالَ الْمِقْدَامُ أَمَّا أَنَا فَلاَ أَبْرَحُ الْيَوْمَ حَتَّى أُغِيظَكَ وَأُسْمِعَكَ مَا تَكْرَهُ ‏.‏ ثُمَّ قَالَ يَا مُعَاوِيَةُ إِنْ أَنَا صَدَقْتُ فَصَدِّقْنِي وَإِنْ أَنَا كَذَبْتُ فَكَذِّبْنِي قَالَ أَفْعَلُ ‏.‏ قَالَ فَأَنْشُدُكَ بِاللَّهِ هَلْ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَهَى عَنْ لُبْسِ الذَّهَبِ قَالَ نَعَمْ ‏.‏ قَالَ فَأَنْشُدُكَ بِاللَّهِ هَلْ سَمِعْتَ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم يَنْهَى عَنْ لُبْسِ الْحَرِيرِ قَالَ نَعَمْ ‏.‏ قَالَ فَأَنْشُدُكَ بِاللَّهِ هَلْ تَعْلَمُ أَنَّ رَسُولَ اللَّهِ صلى الله عليه وسلم نَهَى عَنْ لُبْسِ جُلُودِ السِّبَاعِ وَالرُّكُوبِ عَلَيْهَا قَالَ نَعَمْ ‏.‏ قَالَ فَوَاللَّهِ لَقَدْ رَأَيْتُ هَذَا كُلَّهُ فِي بَيْتِكَ يَا مُعَاوِيَةُ ‏.‏ فَقَالَ مُعَاوِيَةُ قَدْ عَلِمْتُ أَنِّي لَنْ أَنْجُوَ مِنْكَ يَا مِقْدَامُ قَالَ خَالِدٌ فَأَمَرَ لَهُ مُعَاوِيَةُ بِمَا لَمْ يَأْمُرْ لِصَاحِبَيْهِ وَفَرَضَ لاِبْنِهِ فِي الْمِائَتَيْنِ فَفَرَّقَهَا الْمِقْدَامُ فِي أَصْحَابِهِ قَالَ وَلَمْ يُعْطِ الأَسَدِيُّ أَحَدًا شَيْئًا مِمَّا أَخَذَ فَبَلَغَ ذَلِكَ مُعَاوِيَةَ فَقَالَ أَمَّا الْمِقْدَامُ فَرَجُلٌ كَرِيمٌ بَسَطَ يَدَهُ وَأَمَّا الأَسَدِيُّ فَرَجُلٌ حَسَنُ الإِمْسَاكِ لِشَيْئِهِ ‏.‏ Grade: Sahih (Al-Albani) صحيح (الألباني)حكم : Reference : Sunan Abi Dawud 4131In-book reference : Book 34, Hadith 112English translation : Book 33, Hadith 4119

[@11hamma]

why did sheikh not even mention this

[@lailakurji1350]

Tell me was Muawiya Just?

[@safiyayuichi6553]

Yes, but he has some mistakes

[@T-19-]

@@safiyayuichi6553 Mu’awiyyah رضي الله عنه 1.Letter from Roman Empire to Mu’awiyyah: *GOOGLE MU’AWIYAH’S LETTER TO THE ROMANS* ‏Ibn Katheer, may Allah have mercy upon him, mentioned in Al-Bidaayah wa nihayyah: “The Byzantine Emperor had great hopes of attacking and defeating Mu’aawiyah after the latter had instilled fear in him and humiliated him and vanquished his troops. When the Byzantine Emperor saw that Mu’aawiyah was preoccupied with fighting ‘Ali, he approached some cities (on the border) with a huge army, filled with hope of victory. So Mu’aawiyah wrote to him saying, 'By Allah, if you do not desist and go back to your land, O cursed one, I shall reconcile with my cousin and we will unite against you, and I shall certainly expel you from all of your land! I shall keep pursuing you, and the earth, vast as it is, will be straitened for you.' At that, the Byzantine Emperor was scared off and abandoned his plans; he sent word seeking a peace treaty.” 2.Prophet (ﷺ) saying, "Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition." Um Haram added, I said, 'O Allah's Messenger (ﷺ)! Will I be amongst them?' He replied, 'You are amongst them.' The Prophet (ﷺ) then said, 'The first army amongst' my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.' (Sahih Bukhari 2924) This Hadith is about Mu’awiyyah in which the prophet told us about a conquest of Cyprus in the year 647. (فتح الباري ابن حجر volume 6, page 127) Conquest of Cypress When Uthman became the Caliph, Amir Muawiyah reported his proposal to undertake a naval expedition and conquer Cypress. Muawiyah advanced detailed arguments in favor of his proposal. Uthman agreed to the proposal, but laid down the condition that only such persons should participate in the naval expedition who volunteered themselves, and no person should be forced to join the expedition against his will. Muawiyah fitted a strong naval fleet under the command of Abdullah b Qais. Another fleet was sent by Abdullah b Abi Sarah from Egypt. Muawiyah raised a force of volunteers. Among other persons, the volunteers included eminent companions like Abu Dhar Ghifari, Ubadah b Samit, his wife Umm Haraam, Abu Darda and Shaddad b Aus. The Muslim force landed on Cypress in 649 C.E. There was only a small Byzantine garrison on the island which was overpowered without any difficulty. The islanders submitted to the Muslims, and agreed to pay a tribute of 7,000 dinars per year. The conquest of Cypress was the first naval conquest of the Muslims. When the conquest of the island was reported to Uthman he felt satisfied with the result of the first naval expedition. That made Uthman feel that the fears of Umar about naval warfare were unfounded, ano that in future the Muslims would have to conduct campaigns on the sea as well as the land. He accordingly permitted Muawiyah as well as Abdullah b Abi Sarah to build up strong navies in Syria and Egypt. 3.Mu’awiyyah confesses he’s not after khilafa and does not object to the fact that Ali is closer to the prophet than him. Also admits he’ll be the first to swear allegiance to Ali. (Ibn katheer, bidayah wan nihayyah, volume 7, page 283) “I know that Ali is better than me, and deserves this (khilafa) more than me” [Authenticated by Ibn Hajar in Fath Al Bari (13/92)] 4. Ali was asked about the dead from the battle of Siffin so he answered: Our Dead and Their dead are in Heaven, and the matter will be between me and Muawiyah. (Isnad Sahih). -Musannaf Ibn Abi Shaybah 39035 5. Prophet peace be upon him said about: “O’ Allah, make him guided, a guider, and guide people through him.” [Sunan Al-Turmidhi, Book of "Virtues," Chapter of "Virtues of Mu'awiyah," #3842, see also Saheeh Al-Turmidhi #3018] 6.Writer of the revelation: “It is a firm thing that Mu’awiyah was among the writers of the revelation. Muslim narrated in his Saheeh from Ibn Abbas that Abu Sufyan asked the prophet peace be upon him for three things: (He (Abu Sufyan) said to the prophet: “O’ Prophet of Allah, give me three things.” The prophet said: “yes.” … Abu Sufyan said: “Mu’awiyah, make him a writer (of the revelation) under your hands.” The prophet answered: “Alright.”) [Muslim with explanation. Book of "Virtues of the Companions," Chapter of "Virtues of Abu Sufyan," vol.17, p.2501] Ahmad narrated in his Musnad, and Muslim from Ibn Abbas who says: (Once I was a kid playing with other boys when I looked behind and I saw the prophet peace be upon him coming towards us. So I said: “The prophet did not come to anyone but to me.” So I went behind the door to hide. I did not feel until the prophet found me, grasped my neck, and pressed my shoulders gently. The prophet said: “Go and call Mu’awiyah for me.” And Mu’awiyah was his writer (of the revelation). So I went looking for Mu’awiyah and told him: “Go and answer the prophet of Allah peace be upon him because he needs you.”) [Musnad Ahmed, vol.1, Musnad Ibn Abbas #2651, and Muslim with explanation, Book of "Al-Birr wa Al-Silah," #2604] These two hadeeths prove that Mu’awiyah was one of the writers of the revelation.” 7.Prophet (peace be upon him) was married to Mu’awiyyahs sister, Umm Habibah. The prophet was the bother in law to Mu’awiyyah. 8. Narrated Ibn Abi Mulaika: Somebody said to Ibn ‘Abbas, “Can you speak to the chief of the believers Muwaiya, as he does not pray except one Rak’a as Witr?” Ibn ‘Abbas replied, “He is a faqih (i.e. a learned man who can give religious verdicts) .[Bukhari Book #57, Hadith #109] 9.Mu’awiyyah accepted Islam at the treaty of hudaybiyyah and hid his Islam whilst he was in Mecca. Then, when the Muslims conquered Mecca he expressed his Islam openly. (Mu’awiyyah bin Abi Sufian, سير أعلام النبلاء, volume 3, page 122) Allah says about the Muslims at the conquest of Mecca: “Not equal among you are those who spent before the conquest [of Makkah] and fought [and those who did so after it]. Those are greater in degree than they who spent afterwards and fought. But to ***ALL***has promised the best [reward]. And Allah, of what you do, is Aware.”(57:10)

[@RaabiaKitty]

no

[@MuhammadAli-jd4hs]

Shayk i love your other content but i smell nasbiyat in this video. You saying in the video yazeed had his own virtues. May ALLAH SWT guide you

[@RhythmsOfSilence]

Being from Sunni school myself, I can state it's a shamefully water down account and doesn't reflect the Narrative we find in Sunni books of Ahadeeth. Cherry picked points, Bogus drum of "Ijtihad and brushing all clever and mean political choices made to gain and hold Power under carpet of "Ijtihad" and giving wild-card clean chit just because someone saw Prophet in their lifetime doesn't add up. "Awwalu man bagha...." The first Baghi / Rebel against Khalifa Rashid Ali r.a was Muawiyay r.a. We don't insult them and leave matters to Allah swt. But we don't go overboard to defend blunders as it's against our Books of Ahadeeth itself.

[@md.shahadathossain8880]

The prophet (pbuh) was pleased with him,the next 3 caliphs were pleased with him...and ali (ra) was not only misunderstood by him but also by great companions like ayisha(ra),talha(ra),jubair(ra)....what are you gonna say about that?it was not about power...it was about ali (ra)'s ijtihad of delaying the investigation and punishment for the murder of uthman(ra)...munafiqeen even spread rumours that, ali (ra) has become a disbeliever..... That's why rebellion broke out

[@stadiamak692]

If Hussain was an alim, why no hadith through him

[@knowledgeofimportantissues2364]

He is a student of some great ulama Abdus Salam Gulamullah Etc Trust me