4 Resultant force of two vectors at different angles

[@gregorywongsg]

Great video! Must watch if you're not sure how to solve resultant vector using scale diagram

[@MartynDerg]

I've never learned physics, I only came here because I'm a fan of your dad, but I think I just caught on to what you're teaching here XD

[@GoodAkram18]

Lol

[@imnotev1084]

Thankyou so much for this video.Really helpful!

[@LeahRebecca]

where did you get 11 degrees from?

[@imnotev1084]

Yeah I didn't understand either

[@Dynoids]

@@imnotev1084 he just measured it from the protracter from the origin, a flat horizontal line as shown in the figure above the drawing.

[@amrradwan3887]

@@Dynoids the comment is 2 years ago but ok

[@Dynoids]

@@amrradwan3887 I know, just commenting because why not. Maybe someone else comed across it, maybe not. No big deal

[@AS-qj5eh]

@@Dynoids is that the right way to measure it or not please reply asap i got an engineering exam tomorrow

[@chandulirubasinghe6163]

THIS IS WHAT I WAS LOOKING FORR!! thank you so so so much!!!

[@SimonPoliakoff]

You are welcome.

[@apro8918]

Thank out , you are the reason I did decent

[@picoisgod3246]

thanks your my inspiration

[@michellematingo]

Thank you so much!!

[@randomtiktokvideos5372]

Thank you so much I was about to give up

[@SimonPoliakoff]

Glad you found it useful. You might find the ray diagram videos I made useful as well.

[@kinmoto6096]

how about make a video that has a 3 vectors at different angle using scale Method.

[@maryamsuperstar7515]

Thankyouuuuuuuu. 😭 I've been saved.

[@SimonPoliakoff]

I’m glad you found it useful.

[@thegaminglord2329]

How do I draw if resultant forces are the same

[@jackpiper3684]

There is only 1 resultant force tho.....

[@givemebeidou2446]

i did totally forget that we adjecent angles to 180 degree..... now i know.😊

[@SimonPoliakoff]

Glad it was useful. I think the tip to rail method is easier - illustrated in this video: 1 Resultant force of two forces at right angles kzbin.info/www/bejne/gIPWd6tsbrqXesU

[@eshalfaisal3797]

Very helpful

[@SimonPoliakoff]

Glad you found it useful.

[@manidusiriwardana5878]

Thank you sir

[@janphilipbalbin8886]

he just measure the resultant force with a ruler? is that possible?

[@rukki2558]

Yeah u just measure the resultant force line through the parallelogram with a ruler

[@jackpiper3684]

It’s because he made a scale of 1cm = 50N so the resultant force will still have an answer in Newton’s

[@atharvasarode8057]

Solve this question by graphical method

[@KatlegoMpinang]

I don understand the last step...

[@SimonPoliakoff]

You measure the length of the arrow you have drawn in cm and then multiply it by the scale to get the number of Newtons of the resultant force.

[@ireadfanficsforcomfortandn2534]

WHYD we choose 110

[@SimonPoliakoff]

In a parallelogram two adjacent interior angles add up to 180 degrees. 180-70=110. Hope that helps.

[@johnchristopher8462]

@@SimonPoliakoff yeah so you minus the other number by 180 ( int.angles) and then you get 110

[@CharlesJoffri]

Where's 180 come from?

[@Hilyashipanga]

why using 110

[@SimonPoliakoff]

The two adjacent angles in a parallelogram must add up to 180 degrees.

[@Hilyashipanga]

@@SimonPoliakoff thank you 🙏

[@Alidaher2468]

that's wrong the resultant force value is 484 not 515