Chapters: 00:00 - Introduction to Character Types in Film 00:53 Character Types Defined 02:29 - Chapter 1: Flat vs Round 09:02 - Chapter 2: Static vs Dynamic 16:28 Chapter 3: The Shawshank Redemption Deep Dive 20:31 - Takeaways
@itsjohnmauriceotieno11 ай бұрын
Any chance we could get a video on movie runtimes and what intricacies influence them? Thanks. 🎬
@Firegen111 ай бұрын
This is the kind of video people need in literature classes. So many writers struggle bus with the differences.
@Dayvit7811 ай бұрын
Struggle bus?
@kaithecactus371411 ай бұрын
struggle bus @@Dayvit78
@LuisSierra4211 ай бұрын
@@Dayvit78 we are all riding the struggle bus on this fine day
@Firegen111 ай бұрын
@@Dayvit78 Just means struggle usually for a long time. I like the colloquium so I use it.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Hope this video helps!
@wolexismedia11 ай бұрын
Proper theatre literature! Who needs film school when you have studio binder 😂❤
@peterkalyabe755311 ай бұрын
I know, right? 😄
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Class in session!
@ShadionicZX10 ай бұрын
My professor often has us watch a video from Studio Binder in class, I'm sure other film schools around the world use their videos to help with lessons as well.
@haerverk9 ай бұрын
Fun fact: exactly ZERO of your favourite directors paid any attention to either, ever!
@niklas35953 ай бұрын
This channel is so good for pointing out flaws in what writers are usually being taught instead of teaching writers the usual.
@jessebbedwell11 ай бұрын
I love how you employ a diversity of ideas on this channel. We learn that story telling, be it visual or not, is an amalgamation of a varied tool set and mind sets. There are multiple roads which lead to any destination. The only question is: which will you take?
@ahmedalsammar163211 ай бұрын
I hope to add translation in Arabic. You have a large Arabic-speaking audience of cinema lovers and filmmakers who learn a lot from your channel’s wonderful content. Thank you for your efforts.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@SocioSpectives11 ай бұрын
Please do a video on how directors and cinematographers conduct a blocking rehearsal. I love your videos so much and I've learned so much from them than any other resources, I even forgot the last time I watched other KZbin channels. Thank you so much, you've been a blessing in disguise.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion!
@samaraisnt11 ай бұрын
seconded! there should be more on blocking and preproduction in general!
@sunozack43911 ай бұрын
This channel is getting a shoutout at my OSCARS ACCEPTANCE SPEECH
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
We'll be waiting!
@akibtafhim11 ай бұрын
Day by day Studiobinder's videos are getting better and better.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
That's the goal!
@rayancedrichaddad119711 ай бұрын
It's a complete audiovisual encyclopedia about Movie Characters. Thousand Thanks StudioBinder for this Inspiring video. Always Inspiring to learn from you StudioBinder.💯💯
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@dameanvil11 ай бұрын
- [00:53] 📝 Different character types help writers understand their characters' roles and functions within a narrative. - [02:28] 📚 Character categories like flat vs. round aren't binary; characters sit on a spectrum, allowing subjective categorization. - [02:29] 🔄 Understanding flat vs. round characters helps writers decide when and why to use each type effectively. - [09:02] 🔒 Static characters provide consistency and contrast, while dynamic characters offer satisfying arcs of change. - [16:29] 🎬 "The Shawshank Redemption" exemplifies various character types, showing how they can enrich storytelling. - [20:34] 🌟 No character type is inherently superior; each serves a purpose in informing and enhancing the narrative.
@onuohaudochukwu618011 ай бұрын
This one is worth watching over and over again. Thanks for sharing!
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@tonatiuhaguilar186011 ай бұрын
I think this video complements perfectly the ones about character arcs. I don't know if there is one that goes deeply into character dimensions (physical, psychological and social). Anyway, this is a must see video to understand these to aspects of a character. Thank you StudioBinder 😁
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Hope it helps!
@Djwhynotlove11 ай бұрын
This channel is amazing ❤ Always so enjoyable to watch, full of the things I feel but could never put into words & grabs movies I'm remarkably fond about 💕
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Happy to help!
@elizabethw598611 ай бұрын
Perfect timing for this video! We're working on character sheets in my screenwriting class :)
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Good luck!
@ngziin997511 ай бұрын
I have been watching some of your previous videos to understand filmmaking better. They have been beneficial, and this video does it again. Can you make a video about the slice-of-life genre and why people mistake it for the coming-of-age genre?
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion! We covered the coming of age genre in this video if you want to check it out kzbin.info/www/bejne/q4WUlml9frl2qZI
@ThomasHatteland11 ай бұрын
Honestly I want a behind the scenes of the process of making these great videos❤ Get to see the narrator, the writers, editors, animators and the office😊
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Appreciate it :)
@GameWarped11 ай бұрын
this is the best gift for my brithday! Thank U studiobinder!
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Happy birthday!
@CamiloM-iy7qd11 ай бұрын
Great content. Reminds me of people that I've known that fit these descriptions and what type of character I would be within my own story.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Interesting thought experiment 🧐
@CamiloM-iy7qd11 ай бұрын
@@StudioBinder yes I think all of us can be any of them if we observe our own life. For instance my friends that have families could be considered static characters compared to me while I decided to live abroad for yrs and experience life outside of this structure. The stories I have continue as my character arc. So I think writing and creating a character becomes easier with thinking about ourselves and others we know. Love this video btw.
@bubediscuss11 ай бұрын
Some nice character foreshadowing using framing in the GoodWill Hunting scene at 10:06. Chuckie is boxed in by the trailer filling the frame, his future. On the reverse, Will has blue skies overhead (and ahead). (More evident in the wide shots throughout the full scene!)
@jake.walker.official11 ай бұрын
Amazing video as always. Thank you so much.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Glad you liked it!
@disisfunny8811 ай бұрын
Today i had short nap 😴 I dreamt STUDIO BINDER opened new branch in my local area 😅 They were shooting an advertisement video 📹 as I'm going inside during the shooting i told one of the crews: " oh wow guys great work I'm ur fans one of ur subscribers on youtube " Wish it was true ❤
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
haha time to expand
@DS-gh3rc9 ай бұрын
Great video! This channel never disappoints. One thing I'd like to mention: Ferris Bueller himself is a rather static character. In the whole movie he doesn't have a big choice to make. But his best friend does.
@ssprezzatura11 ай бұрын
Thanks to John Truby & Bob Mckee I started understanding how to choose and build my character atmosphere according to the story shape
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Happy writing!
@mainstay.11 ай бұрын
I finally understood why 'Breakfast Club' - just works.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Excellent writing, like most of John Hughes work!
@fuegofranko7 ай бұрын
Same!
@tomlewis474811 ай бұрын
Flat vs. round can be thought of as a constant. Wherever they are on that spectrum, they remain there relatively constantly. Static vs.dynamic can be thought of as relating to the amount of moment to moment change, meaning not constant, but having peaks and valleys of different aspects over the course of the timeline. The more dynamic, the more quick peaks and valleys. IOW, dynamic characters are mercurial and less predictable than static characters, while flat or round characters are much more predictable. Of course if there is change in the character arc, it can be relatively quick change, or relatively slow change, and a character can change from any point on either spectrum to any other point, all of which can be independent of character type. What seems to work best for me (and is the way countless stories are told) is based on contrast between characters. I prefer creating a main character who is more of an everyman, bc readers or viewers can bond to that character and identify with them easier, a character who is slightly flat and slightly static (yet may have a significant change in the character arc) contrasted with a secondary character who is more mercurial and unpredictable, a little rounder and dynamic, bc they will be more interesting to follow, and the reader or viewer, bonded to and identifying with the everyman character, spends much of the story observing and/or helping the more mercurial character. One example is in The Office, where Jim Halpert is the everyman character the audience identifies with, while Michael Scott is the mercurial, unpredictable one he (and the audience) observes. That implies both solidity (Jim) and a 3-ring circus of entertainment (Michael). It gives the audience comfort in the predictability of Jim, and uniqueness and variety in the unpredictable (yet over time, paradoxically predictable) Michael. That dynamic balance of tension is one of the reasons that show ran for 8 seasons. This way there is a constant tension (usually positive) between those characters and each of them can really benefit from the other. The more mercurial character benefits from the more stable character pulling them back onto the rails and the more mercurial character shows the more stable character how life can be more interesting. They need each other. And a story often needs this. If The Office were mostly about Jim, with no Michael character, it would have been pretty boring. If it were mostly about Michael, with no Jim to contrast him with, it just would have been too chaotic for the viewer to latch on to for 8 seasons. And this dynamic can be seen in a high percentage of great stories, bc it works. All you have to do is look for it.
@daydreamerprod5 ай бұрын
Absolutely heart warming references.. Good form Studio Binder
@HolyCrapGodIsReal11 ай бұрын
That was wonderfully done. I’m a better storyteller for having watched it. Thank you.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Happy writing!
@OldMovieRob11 ай бұрын
Hard to think of Samwise Gamgee as a "flat" one, as the richness of his character, his involvement and encouragement of Frodo, and ultimately his happy ending, was so foundational to the narrative.
@LuisSierra4211 ай бұрын
It was shocking at first but they are right, Sam doesn't have a ton of complexity or change, despite being so central to the narrative
@OldMovieRob11 ай бұрын
@@LuisSierra42 I guess so, but even still, after watching the films and all of the larger than life heroic characters, it was always ol' lowly Sam that I felt I could most personally identify with. Maybe I'm just a flat-sort of guy, haha.
@LuisSierra4211 ай бұрын
@@OldMovieRob Being "flat" in this sense is not bad, it serves a purpose in the story. Like they say in this video, not every character needs to be explored in depth
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Flat character doesn't mean a poorly written one!
@spinsandneedles11 ай бұрын
@@StudioBinder You're right! Most movie sports stars are flat and yet dynamic and complex as they react to challenges. How about a video on what makes a great sports movie?
@drewo.12711 ай бұрын
2:36 I uncontrollably belted out “YOU CAN’T HANDLE THE TRUTH!” right at the perfect moment! I couldn’t stop myself… what just happened !?🙃❔
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Movie magic haha
@kidanemariameyob875211 ай бұрын
Can you please also do a video on What is Climax? And What is anticlimax ?
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
We broke down the structure of a climax with Joker in this video! kzbin.info/www/bejne/jpiVhYipibqpl68
@alexanderdekoning99756 ай бұрын
Very helpful, thank you so much!
@hungryheart410611 ай бұрын
Thank you studio binder
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@cliffsofmoherfilmreviews11 ай бұрын
Love your videos 👍
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@TonaA.R.9 ай бұрын
Such informative work!
@rishitaacharia521611 ай бұрын
This video is quite informative 🙂. Thank you
@jahosaphat11 ай бұрын
Thank you SB
@fuegofranko7 ай бұрын
The only channel I continue to come back to for education.
@shiteshkumartiwari455411 ай бұрын
Watching your videos from Nepal 🇳🇵. Lots of love and respect ❤
@lolk772611 ай бұрын
Thank you
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@nishantkamble167511 ай бұрын
In the END a good character is a good character ❤
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
👌💯
@falcongreens257011 ай бұрын
This channel is round and it makes me dynamic.
@ellaillustrates93507 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@Timeless_films11 ай бұрын
You are the reason I love KZbin 😍
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
We love our viewers!
@nurbekmirassov190511 ай бұрын
This might be the best narrator in history
@ViKash-ke7qj11 ай бұрын
The best characters that still surprise me every time I see there will be blood. Now I see why the movie Plot isn't that dynamic. And why characters in movies like night in a museum are so flat. But I guess it takes a jurassic park to see both dynamic visuals and complex characters.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
That's when you get the perfect blockbuster!
@prathameshrana209911 ай бұрын
2 day ago I decided to write characters and now look who come helping
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Happy writing!
@art_njeri661911 ай бұрын
Omgg the theme song is in swahili!! 🥹🥹I loved the characterization of the characters too ♥️
@Cinéphile930411 ай бұрын
Charlie from mean streets is one of the best written characters. Round and dynamic
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Great example!
@brain_respect_and_freedom11 ай бұрын
I was thinking about double role by Dustin Hoffman in "Tootsie" a flat actor vs. a round actress😜😂
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
😅
@kris24229 күн бұрын
I would say Ferris Bueller himself is also a pretty Static Character, much like Rooney. Ferris’s opinions and personality never really change at all by the end, and in fact, the day pretty much reinforced his sentiments. The only two true Dynamic Characters in the film are Cameron and Jeanie. Cameron learned to try to be more assertive and have some self-respect, and Jeanie learned to loosen up a bit and be more free-spirited. This also does make for a uniquely interesting result of a story. Instead of the film being about the protagonist’s growth, it’s moreso about the protagonist’s effects on others.
@kidanemariameyob875211 ай бұрын
Have you also done a video on narrative pacing in films?
@trusarmor495711 ай бұрын
18:00 it is NOT unclear! Hadley Kills Tommy on the Warden's Okay. Why? Because the real killer confessed to Tommy, and Tommy wanted to tell the Parole Board. Andy Dufresne was Worth and Knew too much to be set free.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
👌
@RomaFlix11 ай бұрын
thanks a lot
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@ShahjahanMohammad-t8q11 ай бұрын
Please make a video diff bw character driven plot and plot driven characters
@gitumonikashyap202811 ай бұрын
Plese make a video and explain the "shot division" and "camera angle" choice of film "schindler's list"
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the suggestion!
@rishitaacharia521611 ай бұрын
Please make some videos on the concept : Classical Hollywood Cinema 🙏😊
@Shenanigans_3339 ай бұрын
Sending this to my whole film studies group chat
@Chill_Mode_JD11 ай бұрын
“The world is full of actors pretending to be human” -J.D. Salinger
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
🔥
@bollywoodfightactionreacti918911 ай бұрын
Nice 💯
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@Ogmovieguy11 ай бұрын
Will this Video help in understanding the character in movie
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
It should!
@thhrjdh556411 ай бұрын
Can you guys do "how to do subversive writing"?? It's very popular nowadays but rarely any of them do it right.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Any examples you'd want covered?
@thhrjdh556411 ай бұрын
@StudioBinder basically, any movie/show that deviates from traditional norms in cinema or society as a whole. A lot of Kubrick's was considered subversive for the time. And I would say midsomar because it's subverting traditional horror tropes.
@Not_So_Slim_Shady10 ай бұрын
What's that creepy song at 0:32? I can't find it in the list.
@artistcraving13004 ай бұрын
It's from Oppenheimer is my guess
@frainthesnowАй бұрын
Sikiliza Kwa Wahenga (Main Title) - ost from GET OUT np :)
@elizabethw598611 ай бұрын
IT'S ALWAYS SUNNY MENTIONED!!!!!!!!
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
👍💯
@praveenkumar-yo1xg29 күн бұрын
This is very useful KZbin class. Thank you studio binder I am from India.
@stephenwilliams380711 ай бұрын
I have to take issue with your description of Sam Gamgee as a "flat" character and Frodo as a "round" one. Frodo is presented from the outset as a decent and brave hobbit. Consider when Gandalf says to him in the Fellowship that the Ring can't stay in the Shire, he says straight away "what do I need to do?". He really doesn't waver from the quest at any time except right at the end when he's standing inside Mount Doom. His deterioration into a moody and dark character is caused by the Ring, not by events, and Frodo remains much the same person. For instance, he is kind to Gollum almost right until the end. It is, in fact, his simple decency (which he never loses) that leads to his success. On the other hand Sam's development is one of the key themes of the books and movie series, namely that "heroes" are found in the unlikeliest forms. Sam, who sees himself as a simple gardener, finds in himself as the series progresses incredible courage, resilience, determination, fighting skills and initiative. If you watch the extended versions of the movies, the first main character we see at the start of the Fellowship is Sam and the last character we see at the end of the Return of the King is Sam. That is no coincidence.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Fair points! Only pushback I would say is that the deterioration by the Ring is part of the plot (he's carrying something that corrupts - a plot point)
@stephenwilliams380711 ай бұрын
Yes, but it is Frodo's simply decency and lack of desire for power that protects him and explains why he alone is the one character that can complete the quest (except for Sam). "Greater" people, such as Galadriel, Gandalf, Boromir and Aragorn would not have been able to do it.
@Boncomics10 ай бұрын
10:10 When your true friend REALLLY really cares about you and doesn't try to hold you back out of jealousy.
@Richard-d2i11 ай бұрын
Really enjoyed this 😊
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Great to hear!
@yandhi501611 ай бұрын
We learnt about this in English class
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Nice!
@quantinium11 ай бұрын
Subtitles plz
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Subtitles are up!
@quantinium11 ай бұрын
English only 😢😢😢@@StudioBinder
@daniellatteo_thefilmmaker11 ай бұрын
Sometimes I've noticed that Flat characters are rendered more Round by their backstory or past (if it's honestly told ). That can make them flawed or broken, without many flaws to show for. Some other times, the reverse is also true. The lack of a past can make a character very Flat and downright boring.
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
All character types have to be put into their proper place in the story!
@leonmayne79711 ай бұрын
I think one reason why Shawshank Redemption works is that Andy still goes on a journey, even if his overall personality stays the same.
@presenceof11 ай бұрын
Anyone know the movie at 13:28?
@brandonscullion11 ай бұрын
Garden State
@presenceof11 ай бұрын
@@brandonscullion thanks bud
@reichen60911 ай бұрын
20:24 💜
@Boncomics10 ай бұрын
12:48 Gotta give it to SCOTT PILGRIM for redefining Canadian Superheroes. Sorry, ALPHA FLIGHT. "Scott Pilgrim vs the World" wore it better. #CanadianSuperhero
@markhenzel463711 ай бұрын
Recently I rewatch a movie and realized why the movie feel so long even tho it just 2 hours. Then, i realized that the movie took place like a week in the story. The audience can literally feel the transition of day and night. So the question is, how to make a movie that takes place over the course of a few days/ weeks/ months or years? What the transition is? If you know what i mean...
@iamahuman640210 ай бұрын
Samwise isn’t really flat.
@adibshirazi11 ай бұрын
👌👌
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@ryanhowell449211 ай бұрын
cool
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@ryanhowell449211 ай бұрын
@@StudioBinder I’ve still got long way to go
@Mohammad.Sohel.1611 ай бұрын
Are sar long episodes layena kab khatam ho gaya pata nahi chala
@edgarlozano938211 ай бұрын
My Monday breackfaste
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Goes great with coffee :D
@DarlingDevaa11 ай бұрын
Hey studiobinder can you translate your all videos in hindi ❤️
@edgarlozano938211 ай бұрын
Cool
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Cheers!
@eduardogomez223211 ай бұрын
One of the best flat characters is The man with no name played by Clint Eastwood
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
💯 Can always rely on the great westerns
@wangofree6 ай бұрын
Samwise Gamgee is the hero of the whole trilogy!!!!!
@rebelcat995611 ай бұрын
Arnold from ey Arnold is a very good flat character ❤
@ChargingTurtle11 ай бұрын
Please sir make a video How They Shot La La Land...
@docstockandbarrel2 ай бұрын
👍🏻
@timblighton621611 ай бұрын
With great characters comes great….
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
writing!
@Respect2theFallen11 ай бұрын
Dammit whats fhe last movie I swear I just watched it and forgot it "What do you think youre doing james"
@Respect2theFallen11 ай бұрын
Found it damn that movie was meh it's Infinity Pool I forgot the title and character names and everything 😂😂🤣
@johnjim679311 ай бұрын
This is exactly what I‘ve never liked about „Braveheart“. William Wallace seems to have been constructed more to serve Mel Gibson‘s ego than the story, so as a result he is flat, static, and boring. He is flat because we get to see only stereotypical facets of his character. Wallace is couragious, ambitious and charismatic all right, but that‘s it. He never doubts himself, and when he fails, it is because others are weak or betray him, not because of his personal shortcomings. And just watch how, say, Peter O‘Toole‘ Lawrence of Arabia is haunted by his ghosts of past events, his flawed character exposed, and compare it to the one-dimensional impact that losing parents and wife has had on William Wallace. And he is static because his character stays the same from start to finish. He doesn‘t have to evolve because he is already the complete package as a young man who knows everything from Latin to romance and battlefield tactics. Now flat and static protagonists may work very well with the early James Bond, which is supposed to be over-the-top and cartoonish. But unlike 007, in a historical biography beautiful landscapes and action sequences alone can‘t make up for such a lack in complexity and character development.
@freddyjosereginomontalvo466711 ай бұрын
💖🔥🌍🌟
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@marcomacias396011 ай бұрын
is this like character development? if not why not do a segment on the subject
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
you could say character development is the process of a dynamic character
@kunalbadsiwal965611 ай бұрын
Add more languages please
@SummitPawar-ug4gk5 ай бұрын
Adaptation
@Buffy8Fan11 ай бұрын
I think Sam is static (never changing by always reminding us of the shire), not flat. There's enough character and personality to him that I wouldn't call him one-dimensional. If he was flat, audiences wouldn't have that emotional moment with him carrying Frodo at the end of the third film.
@lonewolf_5811 ай бұрын
Next time please add subtitles
@AskAir11 ай бұрын
They already do. Turn on closed captioning bud
@sandymakesplans11 ай бұрын
the captions are enabled now
@lonewolf_5811 ай бұрын
@@sandymakesplans okay, thanks
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
They're up!
@adithiyan921111 ай бұрын
@@StudioBinderhe was right I also noticed. Whoever sees the video first when the video is uploaded subtitle isn’t available. But later it’s available.
@kaithecactus371411 ай бұрын
eating pasta rn
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Our videos go well with lunch :)
@filmyfreak760811 ай бұрын
Please add subtitles for Indians
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Appreciate the feedback!
@selimutipis11 ай бұрын
Early gang
@StudioBinder11 ай бұрын
Welcome!
@weiyangliu75611 ай бұрын
unestablished writers will absolutely get a pass for flat/passive character