400 MEGAPIXELS 📷Ultra-Hi Resolution Cameras

📷 High Resolution Camera: geni.us/t93yc
🎥 Previous Video • Canon R5 // Hidden New...
✨Lightroom Presets: bit.ly/3TDLKMx
📷 My Camera: geni.us/t93yc
📷 The Best Entry Level Camera geni.us/a2ErXV
📷 More Entry Level Cameras: geni.us/u2gmVo
📷 My Most Used Lens: geni.us/RF15-35mm
📷 My Drone: geni.us/0NF33v
📷 My Camera Bag: geni.us/ya83bN
🎤 My Favorite Microphone: geni.us/SwPS
🌐 All of My Camera Gear:✨geni.us/1NddEAQ
📸 INSTAGRAM: / gugliotta.one
♪ TIKTOK: / blameanthony
🌐 WEBSITE: gugliotta.one
🎵 My MUSIC:
Artlist (2 Months Free): bit.ly/3GshKNA
🎞️ STOCK FOOTAGE:
Artgrid (2 Months FREE): bit.ly/3I3LDEh
Perfect for your Video Projects!
📹 VIDEO ASSETS & TEMPLATES:
Motion Array: bit.ly/3Fkwg8I
Great for Overlays, Titles and More!
*Please note, I may earn a commission on some of the links above.
📧 LET'S CONNECT:
gugliotta.one/...

[@cydu]

Next year. Apple: Introducing iPhone 15 with 10,000 mega pixel. But 2mm sensor

[@AnthonyGugliotta]

I'd buy that

[@I.m_old-_-]

Apple storage 😢

[@theacer7864]

Oh they better put in a thunderbolt port for that 😂

[@polisjoxi69]

Definitely not apple. More like Xiaomi budget phones.

[@itsfikree]

Lmao

[@thomasottvideos]

Great. A 400 MP file will require a supercomputer from MIT for editing in Lightroom. °

[@nelsonclub7722]

nope - my hass H6400c 400mpx and its Mf and FF takes little time on a standard Mac - admittedly blending exposure of 3 or 4 of those images does take a little longer - but then it should - we photograph heritage pieces for museums

[@aernandes1268]

same family, Canon 5DsR has more pixels and better quality than that R5

[@captainbackflash]

Does it take old Canon lenses?

[@mjp29]

no, Canon changed their mount when they went mirrorless The only company to keep the same mount is Pentax....

[@kyleanderson9281]

The GFX 100S already has a 404MP IBIS hi-res mode

[@bluecollar8525]

Interesting. Makes sense. But can you shoot it handheld or do you need a tripod? This canon feature makes it seem like the ibis handles the shifting so that you just hold it and it moves the sensor to get the 9 shots. Because if all canon is doing is stacking 9 individual photos in camera then I don't care, cause we can just do that in post.

[@schm147]

@@bluecollar8525 I can assure you both cameras would require a tripod for this feature. It takes a few seconds to do it.

[@gooeytv1184]

​@bluecollar8525, when you stacked photos, you should use a tripod.

[@CourtWatchAu]

@@bluecollar8525 I think you need to tripod it for teh Canon too, coz the sensor shift (for doubling the resoltion) is very small (half a pixel to the right ) and it needs to be still.

[@thorstenjaspert9394]

In which file format is the 400MP pic saved?

[@ВладУточкин-ъ3т]

*laughs in 2016 Pentax K-1* I saw Olympus here in comments already

[@Linteria]

😂

[@gnosticone]

Never mentions LUMIX… we got photo stacking too ya know!! 😂

[@bluecollar8525]

True, but it doesn't get you 400mp. I think the point is just how many mp you get here

[@marcobakker992]

And in body not external...

[@already_taken_]

@@bluecollar8525 eos r5 is newer than lumix s1r but eos r5 is cool enough

[@karyleianawildernesscapes]

As a Nikon Z9 shooter, I'm stoked for this firmware update for Canon bc it will force Nikon to join the party. This feature is something we've been asking for too, so it'll be interesting to see if Nikon steps up...

[@PatrikHrabovec]

Don't all Lumix cameras have this feature? 🤔🔥

[@owenrodgers8020]

And Olympus, now om system. My EM5 mk 2 from 2015 has this

[@mbismbismb]

400 megapixels too?

[@PatrikHrabovec]

@@mbismbismb It makes 4x the resolution, so on my 16mpx on my Lumix G80 probably not 😂😂 But maybe Olympus or higher end lumix cameras like G9 Gh6 or S1 S5 it could 🤔🤔

[@mbismbismb]

@@PatrikHrabovec nope...the lumix doesnt take 9 shots in total 400 megapixels, unless u want to stake manually on LR or Photoshop

[@n2kos]

it still won’t be as good as a Phase One or Hasselblad stacked medium format sensor though.

[@Linteria]

how many MP?

[@mbismbismb]

But much much much miles better than any FF competitors 😏

[@derp195]

Thats like saying the new honda civic still won't be as good as a Koenigsegg.

[@txmdchickenphotography3787]

Those red anchors are life savers for me I have so much trouble taking in and off my neck strap 😂 plus they kinda look cool 😂😂

[@sebastien7193]

36x24mm adox 20 film is equivalent to ~800Mpx. No need to take several shot, one is enough. It is available with a +20 years old analog camera for 30$ + 5$ for the film. But photography is not about gear and Mpx so who care ???

[@adlerz5433]

GFX100 is a pretty cool camera

[@AnthonyGugliotta]

Cool, but expensive! 😛

[@bngr_bngr]

Esthetically, I wish the camera and lenses were better designed.

[@cnboy14]

​@@AnthonyGugliotta here is UK this isn't that much of a difference in price between gfx 100s and a canon r5 But for me both are expensive 😂

[@bluecollar8525]

Yeah, only downside is the lenses. Not very fast and the zooms don't have much range. If you reallllly need the extra half stop of dynamic range, okay. But full frame isn't far behind and the lense selection is way better

[@vulcanlastshelter4571]

Meanwhile Oppo/Xiaomi launchrd mid-range phones with 200mp cameras!!

[@CC-1.]

I export mine Games Graphics at 1080000 ² 😅 I think I'm doing over kill than because I thought mine setup is trash not instantly exporting it 😂

[@bobbydigital7061]

Olympus Cameras has a high resolution shot since 10 years. 🤷🏼‍♂️😅

[@jaimeduncan6167]

But do they match? 400 megapixels? The only one I now has a higher resolution and it's not aa custom endeavor is the H6D-400C and on paper, the difference is very little. Clearly, the reality is not paper.

[@artsilva]

@@jaimeduncan6167 20Mp MTF sensor at 50 to 80Mp. Now hypothetically lets do the math equivalency given the format and pixel density; That FF Olympus sensor would be about a 62Mp sensor given it's pixel pitch. Canon's 45Mp sensor to 400Mp os a x 8.9 factor. That would make an equivalent FF Olympus a high res mode at 551.8M pixels. I think Olympus pretty much figured it out a decade ago with MFT sensors. Canon and Sony aught to thank Olympus for that technology for starters.... and no I am not a MFT shooter, just stating reality.

[@TheReallyBadChannel]

You’ll never….. EVER, need 400MP 🤦‍♂️

[@the_giant01]

Sooooo first it’s not in the market yet.. sec, as I said before.. the gf can go over 400 😅

[@bluecollar8525]

But does the GF do it handheld using the ibis to stabilize and align, or do you need a tripod?

[@the_giant01]

@@bluecollar8525 using the ibis

[@Hummer4798]

The nikon z9 has 0.7 or 0.6 more megapixels

[@ulw3855]

Hi Anthony. Just curious. Why do you use Canon and not Sony cameras or any other brand? Maybe you could make a video about why. 😄

[@77dris]

Sony users get REALLY offended these days if anybody uses cameras other than Sony (Fuji are pretty bad too). I've shot as a pro for 18 years and have always used Canon and have never been tempted to switch. For me Canon have the best reliability, best ergonomics and lenses and are the easiest, best to use. Sonys feel like android phones (kind of cheap feeling, too many menu options and issues but do have some good tech). Nikon were great but again, just a sideways move from Canon (at best, though Canon are now better with their mirrorless). None of the rest are really worth mentioning.

[@rghgamer5368]

​@@77dris i think that panasonic is worth mentioning. Especially for video with their new model with pdaf. Never underestimate or overestimate a camera by its brand(except if its hasselblad which costs as a family can and for that its not preferred by many.)

[@tdawg719]

@@77dris you’ve shot canon for 18 years and never switched. So you can’t really speak on any other camera other than Canon. End of story

[@schm147]

@@TigaWould okay I'm gonna have to disagree with you here on lenses. Firstly, you can use EF lenses on Sony cameras, they do make adapters for them. Secondly, even if you're counting EF lenses, I would still argue Sony has the best lens selection. There are no RF lenses (and very few EF lenses) that don't have an E-mount equivalent (feel free to prove me wrong). On the flip side, there are some incredible E-mount lenses that don't have any EF or RF equivalents, such as the legendary Tamron 35-150mm f/2-2.8, or the Tamron 28-200mm f/2.8-5.6. Show me ANY EF/RF superzoom lens with a maximum aperture wider than f/3.5. There's the RF 24-240mm f/4-5.6 but it's trash. No sharpness in the corners whatsoever, regardless of zoom or aperture. Lens reviewer Christopher Frost described it as "a pickup truck powered by a lawn mower engine, with a bunch of turbochargers just to get it going". Sony's 24-240mm isn't superb either but still better than the Canon, and again, they have two other incredible superzooms that have no Canon equivalent. On the telephoto end, Sony has almost a dozen options in the 70 to 600 range, including the G 200-600mm. I'm not even sure EF has that many. The options they do have are great, but RF still has a long way to go with only a 70-200, 100-400, and 100-500. In summary, Sony is the clear winner just from the existence of the Tamron 35-150 f/2-2.8 and 28-200 f/2.8-5.6, and the Sony G 200-600. Since they're mirrorless lenses, they can't be adapted to any other mount. And since Sony has a 12% stake in Tamron, it's very likely Tamron will continue to reserve their best lenses only for the E mount.

[@Linteria]

@@TigaWould bruh... i thought dude had a point and gave him a like, then i had to take it back after reading your essay! 😂 PURE FACTS SPOKEN!!!

[@AnthonyGugliotta]

2 Weeks ago I guessed this. That video is here: kzbin.infovCusI1iWax4

[@mattdamarell]

Well it was on canonrumours 2 weeks ago you mean 😁

[@v_stands_for_value124]

Fujifilm GFX100S PixelShift

[@MatthewUseda]

I wouldn't say it's the highest resolution sir. Because GFX100S also does 400 megal pixel images by also doing the same shifting. Except you'll still get higher resolution with the medium format sensor and greater detail.

[@AnthonyGugliotta]

First

[@benjidoerr]

Second

[@J_cream_]

third

[@MarcTaraz]

Sony has had the multi pixel shift for years. You still need a tripod and a non moving subject. Great for landscapes, not really applicable to anything else

[@the_giant01]

The Fuji can get over 400

[@sodiumsalt]

Any word on other cameras getting this update? R6 ?

[@earth9258]

It is pretty cool, even if it’s a relatively old idea. I believe Pentax has a hand held high res mode, and one that corrects for motion. But if you are stuck on a tripod, I prefer taking a panorama instead. Since you diminish the flaws of the lens. Asking for 400mp of resolution out of a lens is not a small task, especially in the edges. Or better yet, both. Always good to have more flexibility though.

[@wesleychapman9001]

put it on the original r6 and get it anywhere above 60MP and I'll ecstatic

[@BenDunlop]

So Canon R6 isn't getting this?

[@HagaishiSama]

Impressive mode for 240 megapixel or 400 megapixel. Buckhannon is still plagued with some crappy lenses compared to Sony. But very cool

[@peterreber7671]

These pixel shift claims are nonsense. Just think about it, there would have to be massive gaps between the pixels so that it could shift into this space. I don't think there are such gaps. If it shift into a place where another pixel was previously one doesn't get double the number of pixels.

[@rellaxum]

😂damn ...wow ...amazing ...the fuckalacka news .. seriously go check a phase one 150+ mp without binding,stacking multiple shots ,shifting etc ...straight one f...shot ...phase one ...since 3-4 years ago ...back to the future 😂

[@msh4805]

Olympus had this for more than 7 years

[@JeahnLaffitte]

Resolution is overrated IMO 🤷‍♂️ but it keeps the competition moving so I’m good with it!

[@t0992]

Im not sure but i think Olympus/OM System had this Feature for mans years OM-1 (20MP Sensor) has 50MP Handheld HiRes and 80MP Tripod Photos Olympus has many great Features and usally before anyone else But unfortunateiy only the big three(Sony, Canon, Nikkon) are praised. Fullframe......

[@Priyodarsono]

Wait...they still use the multi-shot technology??? In Film photography we call it mult shot & that already exist when the first 35mm film was launched to the market to fullfil the need of some people that use the 35 mm but want the image to be as good as 120 film format. That's work by zooming to an object then take some frames by nX x nY (nX= amount of frames from X axis, nY= amount of frames from Y axis). E.g. 3 x 3 that's means 9 frames consist of 3 frames from right to left or vice versa & 3 frames from above to bottom or vice versa.

[@elliott7531]

Although 400mp sounds cool - for professionals. It's pretty pointless to regular photographers if you're not making GIANT prints.. If you're getting into photography, trust me the older DSLRs are still great. Something like a Nikon D750 is still a fantastic camera.

[@FrankyFeedler]

You present this as a different technology from Sony (“some stacking”) which it isn’t. Both systems shift the sensor around and make multiple pictures to achieve higher stacked resolution. Only difference is Sony does it for years already. Making this technology very much available. Also, IBIS sensors don’t use motors.

[@jaimeduncan6167]

He is wrong, but only for the tiniest of factors, The resolution is 99.74% of the resolution of the H6D-400C which is a pretty old medium format camera. The camera is still for sale.

[@alansach8437]

Why do I need a 240 megapixel photo, or more? Are you shooting billboards? I certainly don't have a computer that could process those images! Storage would be insanely expensive! I imagine someone has a need for this somewhere, but it certainly isn't me! What a joke!

[@bandiceet]

Maybe someone can tell me: My phone, which is already a few generations old, can take 104MP photos. Now, I understand most people just don't require this level of detail in their photos (since very few people work in a field where they blow their images up to the size of billboards, or need to zoom in to a small detail). The question is, why is my now older phone is capable of this level of MP, but there are no dslr (or mirrorless variants) on the market that can work at this level?

[@global001]

So you’re lying ’the canon R5 is NOW the highest resolution camera on the market’. It doesn’t have that feature yet. R5 doesn’t even have the 50mp resolution of the 5DsR. 😂

[@jassimmadan9851]

400mp or 400mb ? If it 400mp is it upscale !? if it 400 mb pixel shift ?! Bout canon writ 400mp !! Canon ! You don't know what your talking about .

[@AD4K69-a]

I don’t really get why you need that much megapixels. I mean for me personally, 16 megapixels is good enough. I get that you need more megapixels for more serious photography but damn.

[@te0pol159]

It's in JPEG... Even my old Olympus can take the HR shots in RAW. Normal Canon advertisement crap.

[@LoFiAxolotl]

Ehhh tried the multishots on everything from a GFX 100 to S5 II... none of them add any detail it's kind of a waste of storage space

[@omegaman1409]

Unless your shooting billboards size pictures it's useless. All your doing is taking space and power from your computer.

[@thaxreston4740]

No, the Nikon z7 and z9 have more pixels than the R5. The multi stacking requires complete stillness, most useless in the real world.

[@markoigoga]

So not only is it not out yet and fuji 100s has had it since lunch (2 year ago) but fujis is still like 407 mpx, as always your videos are full of false information

[@alfredoojeda7977]

If it’s not available how is it the highest resolution cameras if there already AVAILABLE 400 megapixels

[@mikepanton]

any camera can do that in post...which I'm sure anybody actually needing 400 megapixels would still prefer to do

[@primusreborn]

Probably the hottest camera as well…… literally

[@HagaishiSama]

LMAO 😂😂 A1 and a7R V Took them titles lol

[@MO.NO84]

What a great Idea from Canon we all need new Computers for Postproduction. I think i realy need 400mgpx for Insta😂

[@AngryNegativeHistoryProject]

$5k for that camera. Hope you got some money to spend. I'm still eating bugs for protein until I get enough money to get McDonald's

[@jasmijnariel]

I have it. Bought ist second handed with only 1500clicks on it😂 Damn i was happy

[@tdawg719]

These modes never translate in the real world. They are practically useless outside of a testing environment. It’s marketing bullshit.

[@gaarakabuto1]

This is old technology used in sinar and phase one digital backs, the main difference is that the pixels have different overall value and also their normal shooting condition is taking four or three shots by default to utilise their colour science. Specifically the sinar multishot technology takes four shots with a MASSIVE sensor to individually capture all four colours they use on each pixel with GRBG (Green-Red-Green-Blue) and create an actual colour in combination of the individual values of each colour. In the contrary canon's and Sony's technology takes each shot and each pixel has one colour of which is calculated by the individual value in comparison to it's neighbor pixel's value, then stacks the image for higher resolution and may or may not correct the colours while stacking it (sinar's sensor calculates the colour and delivers an image instead of stacking the images and correcting afterwards leading to higher accuracy and less noise). Ofc canon costs a fraction of the price of sinar and phase one sensors and those two also require a separate body to operate.... sooo yeah.

[@blakemayprice]

Okay! Time to transfer these images... [Your computers storage is full] ... Never mind!

[@binvids]

Hahah, this stitching photos and making it into 96 MP already done by Panasonic lumux camera, long years back i hope😅

[@cursedfox4942]

You can stack 2000 photos in photoshop and lightroom it’s a gimmick doesn’t really work like having an actual 200mp sensor

[@4lxAnd3r]

Well just like the pixel shift feature on the Sony A1 or A7R... Canon being a copy cat...

[@hansn.433]

So like basically any other camera on the world. Not like an a7riv could go over 200mp with that technique

[@varsoviamedia]

Sounds cool but impractical. I could see 400mp cool if your tryna print something the size of the moon 😂

[@i_m_an_egg2757]

Lumix S5II at 90MP and HALF the price (for honestly even better specs)

[@booksandchai4158]

Hey I am from India and I do phone photography but I want to buy a camera I am a student so wanted to buy cheap a good camera..and also good for beginners.

[@nelsonclub7722]

My Hass H6400C was doing this years ago = and its MF and near as makes no difference full frame - do your research

[@mattdamarell]

Very disappointed in the implemenation of this. Only a jpg. I hope the rest of the rumoured updates are still on their way.

[@alexanderreiner7694]

Just zoom in and make 20 Photos. Than zoom out and put them in Lightroom and Stack the automaticity together

[@DETROIT12345678933]

At work 10MP is more than enough for work. Clients pay for and get. Just going in the web.

[@Adthin]

To me this seems absolutely pointless, its the kind of feature you use once, think that was awful and don't touch again.

[@zeyadbassiouny8898]

Funfact: these days res are high enough to the point where mp count doesnt matter, so… it doesnt rly matter 😊

[@Tigerisverycute]

And the human eyes resolution is 250MP. Soon we will surpass biological tech

[@shim2387]

knock off function from Pentax almost 6 years ago. too bad Pentax isn't loved as much as Canon

[@anzer789]

To reach that resolution, the sensor has to shift 3x its size in each direction. How is that even possible with such a tiny movement?

[@mikeyb6737]

And is a piece of shit video camera -- its not medium format and the glass is so overpriced Canon will go under next year

[@Ender_P.K]

That noise in the begin is gorgeous. P.S. any IBIS in-body image stack is garbage.

[@WaddyMuters]

Olympus is dead, who are canon and sony going to copy from, now that they caught on the old Olympus tech?

[@kabn131]

Still a JPEG, so why should i use it as someone who paid like 5000$ for a camera?

[@sliiahn]

The feature is not yet available and you say that the R5 is now the camera with the most MP?? That makes no sense bro

[@22rre]

It is a borderline useless feature for most users. You cannoy have a still scene/object every time you shoot.

[@mikhaelshadow]

I ll just go and say this... photo stacking is overrated and doesn't work that well.

[@mjp29]

Yet another video where someone thinks that since Canon sells the most cameras then they must have the highest resolution....

[@sksamiuddinsksamiuddin1691]

Bhai jaan me bohot garib hu muja ak mirrorless camara dilado na plz bhai muja sony a7iii bohot acha laga he plz plz plz dilado na 😭😭😭😭😭

[@pluggednickels]

A very niche feature for a very select few situations. as anything in your scene can’t move in even the least little bit to accomplish that resolution

[@AnthonyGugliotta]

Yup. Tripod only.

[@samorayee420]

I like blackmagic ursa min pro 12k can destroy every camera in the world

[@bngr_bngr]

I wonder if they can do that for the R6II too?

[@AnthonyGugliotta]

Will the R6 get an Ultra Hi-res mode? #photography

[@joca1378]

My grandfather's single grandson wants to buy one but he's stupid.

[@Shonade_Malik]

So that is 32K resolution?!

[@pepetrueno8722]

You say “Now”, but then proceed to say it’s under development

[@nahisquad]

am live in Ethiopia and not enough money to buy camera places give to me camera

[@cheesymoon296]

Will it come to not all models with IBIS, but to those with digital or even no image stabilization?

[@AnthonyGugliotta]

Right now it looks like the R5 only

[@cheesymoon296]

@@AnthonyGugliotta aw that sucks. hopefully their other cameras like the R6 lineup get this feature in the future.

[@PiyerX]

I am so much interested in photography and videography but I dont know anything about these cameras and settings 🥲🥲

[@zuesh]

First time you mention sony you forget to mention lumix hahahaha

[@VinnyDoesLife]

No need. And that's such a waste of hard drive space. Canon sucks.

[@krane15]

That should be the highest resolution none specialty camera.

[@smeqwack7337]

imagine using a macro lens with that much resolution. I want to see atoms at the lowest level

[@KeithZierler]

no its not. NIKON just came out here in Japan that puts cannon behind.

[@lindstrem]

400mp in jpeg, no raw = worthless

[@AlainDumasblogphoto]

I have an R5, I want his but will believe it when it comes out.

[@slurp3194]

Idk if u want file sizes that big lol.

[@orilio3311]

​@@slurp3194 you would start measuring image size in CF/SD cards per hour lmao