是的,我也觉得对歧视和stereotypes的分析十分精辟! 您也想要弄tiny house吗?我一直有看一个” living big in a tiny house”的频道。
@waysfu2 жыл бұрын
@@emilyinnetherlands5295 tiny house 在北美是個風潮,尤其在年輕人當中 living offgrid,荷蘭是個小國,想必更是趨勢。除了living big in tiny house, 還有其他很多很精彩的頻道 homesteadonomics, handeeman, girl in the woods, the nomadic movement, Elsa Rae & Barron....
I have been invited to church and bible study many times, but in the end, I still stick to my own belief, Buddhism which resonates with my upbringing. What I mean is the faith can't be forced upon, it is a matter of 緣。More importantly, don't be a fanatic and believe your belief is the only path, and then start condemning others who don't share your belief.
@yiqingwang14376 ай бұрын
@WWLooi-js8rl Not condemning but warnings. Jesus Christ said, "I am the Way, the Truth and the Life". God doesn't lie.
@@12121xyz 我個人認為,閣下對於[公平]兩字的理解,有一定程度上的認知錯誤。 公平所指的是大家的[機會平等],在同一個起跑點出發。 這是為何 meritocracy 是美國社會一向對外宣稱具有高度吸引力的社會制度。 一個人無論膚色, 宗教信仰,性別等條件,大家的[機會相同]。 但 Affirmative Action 明顯的就是打破了[機會平等]equal opportunities based on meritocracy 的制度,而是用名額保障內建了一個走向[齊頭式平等]的不公平制度。 "Equal opportunity" never guarantees "equal outcome". 如果那5%人口比例的亞裔學生,在學習成績與能力表現上就是硬生生的比那15%的黑人族裔與24%的拉丁美族裔強,那麼大學入學標準沒道理要按照[人口比例]為黑人或是其他少數族裔設立保障名額。 Academic institutions introducing a system based on "racial quotas", is indeed discriminatory and goes against the idea of meritocracy.
@@12121xyz 「加分」因為來自「弱勢族群」這個概念我懂,但以meritocracy 的觀點看來是個灰色地帶。 但「保障名額」這個做法又大不相同了。 That only ensures 來自「弱勢族群」的這個分流團體當中各個入學申請候選人,他們在這個小圈圈裏的相互競爭。 It’s like the saying: When you and a friend are hiking in the mountains and you see a bear in the woods charging at you… In order to stay alive…you don’t have to out-run the bear, you only have to out-run your friend.