The scaling of the **total attacking power** of your mouse army is actually very slightly faster than exponential scaling, due to the fact that the number of Chapter 4 procs is also increasing with a delay of 2 steps. Starting at about the 9th-10th turn after your engine starts working, the attacking power of your army gets multiplied by about 2.5x each turn, but the multiplier increases by a few hundredths each turn (x2.42, x2.54, x2.57, x2.59, x2.60 and so on). So it grows a bit faster than 2.5^x, slightly faster than exponential. I'm sure someone more clever than I could work out the general formula , I only looked at the first dozen or so entries in the series :D edit: The Fibonacci sequence (rate of scaling of your number of Sagas) is itself a quasi-exponential growth, given that one of its most famous properties is how the ratio between its steps approaches the Golden Ratio φ. The more you know!
@meant2live218 Жыл бұрын
Do you play any Magic formats beyond Arena Standard? I've been trying to pick up (in paper) a few Pioneer decks, and my local shops lean into Modern, which is too intimidating for me. Most of the time, people are either playing Commander or drafting.
@Dsmky117 Жыл бұрын
lol i hope my exponential combo pedantry wasn't annoying. nice to see your brand of control, i like it!
@jackkelley9657 Жыл бұрын
Seriously the way it goes. I'll get stomped by mono red or some form of aggro on a Midrange archetype, brew and revise my deck against it, only to play control and domain the rest of the time 😅
Move how he says "mono red is 30% of meta so bringing Elspeth smite for Underdog" ummmm.... NLOL What?!?? What about Squee or Phoenix Chick?? Id definitely say they are much better targets considering the Meta at hand, but otherwise good deck sir! (:
@J.Tarrou Жыл бұрын
Obviously nobody is going to be playing Squee and Underdog in the same deck, so it's not like you need to choose between them. Underdog is included in a ton of decks, and it's always worth denying the ability to blitz it from the graveyard.