If I had only added "senior math" before I finished high school 62 years ago, I might have been successful when I tried engineering in college. Now when I watch documentaries about building the Golden Gate bridge and the Eiffel tower I'm reminded to look for new mental challenges at age 80. Don't give up on your dreams when you're a frustrated 18-year-old. The people who say they can or they can't are both right. Of all sad quotes of mice or men, the saddest are these: "It might have been."
@flagmichael2 ай бұрын
First year algebra. Either (4x+5) is zero or (x+1) is zero. Ten seconds at most.
@jeffpowers1979Ай бұрын
well isn't 0x0 =0
@PraiseDogАй бұрын
@@jeffpowers1979 Well yes, but x can't be equal to two different things at the same time.
@redblack84142 ай бұрын
I used the quadratic formula instead of assuming that one or both binomials is or are equal to zero. I had forgotten about that. I studied algebra in the 60s and early 70s. Your channel is really interesting.
@ishtiaqahmedkhan23282 ай бұрын
Nice thing is that it refreshes olden school time era!
@BlackLadyRules2 ай бұрын
Love these videos. It’s not “being that”. It’s “since.”
@Stylux-z1p2 ай бұрын
[4x + 5 ] [x + 1] = 0 4x[x + 1] + 5[x + 1] = 4x² + 4x + 5x + 1 = 0 4x² + 4x + 5x + 1 = 4x² + 9x + 1 = 0 ---> looks like a quadratic equation the first term of the trinomial has a power of 2 , that means the equation has to solutions reverting back to its original form : [4x + 5 ] [x + 1] = 0 [4x + 5 ] [x + 1] = 0 --> property of multiplication if one of the factors of the multiplication is zero the product is also zero -> a * 0 = 0 , 0 * b = 0 4x + 5 = 0 4x + 5 - 5 = 0 - 5 4x = -5 4x / 4 = -5 / 4 x = - 5 / 4 --> first solution x + 1 = 0 x + 1 - 1 = 0 - 1 x = -1 second solution The two solutions of the quadratic equation { -5 /4 , -1} ---> ANS proof by substitution: [4(-5/4) + 5 ] = 0 [(-1) + 1] = 0
@gregpoehlein66542 ай бұрын
The Zero Product Property can be derived Algebraically. For the left term, divide both sides of the equation by (x+1), which yields (4x+5) = 0/(x+1). Zero divided by anything is zero, so the equation becomes (4x+5) = 0. Likewise, divide both sides by (4x+5), which yields (x+1) = 0/(4x+5). This becomes (x+1) = 0.
@dazartingstall66802 ай бұрын
I'm not so sure. The Zero Product Property states that if xy = 0 then either x, y *or both* must be zero. Your method works fine if only x or only y is zero, but if both are, we end up with each being equal to 0/0, which is undefined.
@gregpoehlein66542 ай бұрын
@@dazartingstall6680 - Note that I said derived, not proved. As long as the variables remain unresolved (in other words, they are not actually equated to 0, we can divide 0 by the variable and we are fine. And since we resolve only one variable at a time, it works. In other words, either x=0/y, or y=0/x, but not both at the same time. I'm really only deriving the result of the Zero Product Property, not proving it. And deriving the result is not the same thing as proving or defining it. Semantics, perhaps, but it does work.
@dazartingstall66802 ай бұрын
@@gregpoehlein6654 That's a good distinction. I withdraw my objection
@jayden_the_bullnguyen10022 ай бұрын
Wonderfully explained❤
@oldrrocrКүн бұрын
if your point is to "get to the point", the lesson starts at 14:00. right?
@robertstuart66452 ай бұрын
When the quadratic equation is in the parenthetical form, as is the case here, simply set each parenthetical expression "=0" and solve for "x".
@marccracchiolo49352 ай бұрын
Great video thanks for sharing it’s so easy to forget this stuff
@YvanStansfeld2 ай бұрын
(4x+5)(x+1)=0 =4x^2+9x+4x and the other way is 4x+5=0 -5. -5 x= -5/4 x+1=0 -1. -1 x=-5/4. x=-1 Then combine the like terms and coefficients (4x+5)(x+1) = 4x^2+9x+5
@YvanStansfeld2 ай бұрын
68x39= 2,652
@YvanStansfeld2 ай бұрын
Do 70x39= 2,730 then multiply the base number 39x2 =78 Subtract 2,730 - 78 = 2,652 that's how people will do it in their head lightning fast Vehicle trick from India Wish it was taught here in schools here. Thank-you
@YvanStansfeld2 ай бұрын
Vedic I meant lol
@ehonwasamuel815810 күн бұрын
(4x + 5)(x +1) = 0. Expand to remove the brackets and collect terms: 4X x X = -5 -1 4X = -6 X = - 6/4 X= - 1 1/2 .
@panlomito2 ай бұрын
Quadratic equation ax² + bx + c = 0 always have 2 solutions for y = f(x) = 0 according to John. That is not correct because the parabola can be fully above or below the x-axis (discriminator D = b² -4ac < 0) resulting in NO solutions for y = f(x) = 0, the parabola just touching the x-axis with the top (D = b²-4ac =0) resulting in just ONE solution for y = f(x) = 0 or with the TWO solutions for y = f(x0 = 0 when D = b²-4ac > 0 resulting in 2 crossings with the x-axis. For example: 2x² + x + 4 = 0 so a = 2 b = 1 and c = 4 -> D = (1)² - 4 . (2) . (4) = 1 - 32 = -31 so there are no solutions for y = f(x) = 0 with a > 0 this top down parabola is fully above the x-axis. xtop = -b / 2a = -(1) / 2 . (2) = - 1/4 and ytop = f(-1/4) = 2 . (-1/4)² + 1 . (-1/4) + (4) = 1/8 - 2/8 + 4 = 3 7/8 and top at ( -1/4 , 3 7/8 ) Or -x² - 4x - 4 = 0 so a = -1 b = -4 and c = -4 -> D = (-4)² - 4 . (-1) . (-4) = 16 -16 = 0 so there is only 1 solution for y = f(x) = 0 with a < 0 this top up parabola is just touching the parabola with its top at xtop = -b / 2a = -(-4) / 2. (-1) = 2 and top at (2,0) and the rest of the parabola under the x-axis.
@PraiseDogАй бұрын
I see a lot of comments with people trying to make things overly complicated. Always look for the simple solution to problems, don't complicate things when you don't need to. You have a product of two brackets. What makes one zero, what makes the other zero? Done, move on to the next problem.
@panlomito2 ай бұрын
This quadratic equation is too easy again, already factorised for our convenience: x = - 5/4 or x = -1 Going back: 4x² + 5x + 4x + 5 = 0 so the unfactorised equation will be 4x² + 9x +5 = 0 with a = 4 b = 9 and c = 5 How DO we factorise this? First step a/a . x² + bx + ca = 0 so x² + 9x + 20 = 0 factorised in (x+5)(x+4) = 0 and now we divide the answer by a = 4 So (x + 5/4).(x + 4/4) = (4x + 5).(x + 1) = 0 Tadaaaaaa!
@btpcmsagАй бұрын
Sorry, I don't understand your "steps "
@panlomitoАй бұрын
@@btpcmsag It is a nice procedure to factorise quadratics when a is not 1 with a in ax² + bx + c = 0 The procedure starts with dividing a by a : (a/a) . x² = 1.x² = x² and multiplying c with a : c.a You now have a modified equation that is easier to get factorised: x² + bx + c.a = 0 After factorising this modified equation you get (x+d).(x+e) = 0 Last step is to bring a back in the factors by multiplying x with a : (ax + d).(ax + e) = 0 For example: 6x² - 5x - 4 = 0 modified: (6/6)x² -5x - 4.6 = x² -5x - 24 = 0 factorised in (x - 8).(x + 3) = 0 and modified back to (6x - 8).(6x + 3) = 0 or (3x-4).(2x+1) = 0 Answer x = 4/3 or x = -1/2 Check with abc-formula: D = b² - 4ac = (-5)² - 4.(6).(-4) = 25 + 96 = 121 positive so 2 solutions xtop = -b / 2a = -(-5) / 2.(6) = 5/12 vertical symmetry-axis of parabola x = xtop delta = V(D) / 2a = V(121) / 2.(6) = 11/12 distance between xtop and the two solutions for y = f(x) =0 x = xtop minus/plus delta so x1 = 5/12 - 11/12 = - 6/12 = -1/2 and x2 = 5/12 + 11/12 = 16/12 = 4/3 check !
@thomasharding18382 ай бұрын
YES! (The question is "Can You Solve?, not 'What is X?' But for those who misread the question, X = -1 and -5/4)
@jeffpowers1979Ай бұрын
I still want to know how you came up with -1 and -5/4 other than just saying that. The Logical question is What is X and how do you get the value
@thomasharding1838Ай бұрын
@@jeffpowers1979 For (4x + 5)(X + 1) to equal 0, either 4x+5 or x+1 has to equal 0. Therefore 4x + 5 = 0 resolves to 4x = -5 => x = -5/4 or, x + 1 = 0 which resolves to x = -1. But still, the question is "Can You Solve?" not "What does x equals".
@richardhole8429Ай бұрын
1. Quadratic 2. Yes Technically you did not ask for the two solutions but I did then in my head in a couple of seconds.
@russelllomando84602 ай бұрын
Got both of them. I had each = 0 and solved for x. - 1 and -5/4 Thanks for the fun.
@nadiaconseillant86162 ай бұрын
4x^2 + 4x + 5x + 5= 4x^2 + 9x + 5
@YvanStansfeld2 ай бұрын
78x32= 2,496
@billmclaurin6959Ай бұрын
How can we justify to assume that both (4x+1)=0 and (x+1)=0? only one of the expressions needs to be zero for the product of the two expressions to equal zero.
@henkhu100Ай бұрын
That's why he says "or" has to be zero.
@chrisdissanayake69792 ай бұрын
(4X+5)(X+1)=0 Either (4X+5)=0 OR (X+1)=0 If 4X+5=0, X=-5/4 If X+1=0, X=-1 X=-5/4 OR X =-1
@ralphmelvin10462 ай бұрын
That was a good way to end it I thought you were going to stop with the 4x=-5 x=-1
@chalapathitk89728 күн бұрын
Good explanation, tq. Haribol Harekrishna
@dazartingstall66802 ай бұрын
(4x + 5)(x + 1) = 0 If 4x + 5 = 0 then 4x = −5 x = −1.2 If x + 1 = 0 then x = −1 [edited for a stupid presentational mistake]
@johnmarchington31462 ай бұрын
It's a quadratic equation and x's two values are -5/4 and -1
@jeffpowers1979Ай бұрын
Just show us how to find the value of X
@davidbrown8763Ай бұрын
I did this in my head, but thanks for the challenge.
@mylittlepitbull31432 ай бұрын
I KNOW THE ANSWER! I KNOW THE ANSWER! (Hand up in the air frantically waving to the teacher) The answer is... YES. I can solve.
@thomasharding18382 ай бұрын
Poor Teacher! He got stuck with TWO Smart Ass comments within ten minutes of each other. I didn't see your comment or I would have held off on mine. BS I would hold off!! Not in THIS Lifetime. But at least only one of us was standing up waving our hands!)
@panlomitoАй бұрын
Notice that NO is also a perfect answer if you can not solve.
@mylittlepitbull3143Ай бұрын
@panlomito You are correct and you have now graduated to the next level.
@btpcmsagАй бұрын
x=-1, or x=-5/4
@sdcashman4520 күн бұрын
FOIL method
@geogeo60717 күн бұрын
First FOIL and then use the quadratic equation.
@pandurangaraonimmagadda99662 ай бұрын
x=-1or x=-5/4
@seibertmccormick184Ай бұрын
-1.25 or -1 It took a few seconds.
@mollymam71532 ай бұрын
X=-1 or X=-5/4
@josephlaura73872 ай бұрын
X= -1, x= -5/4
@manjeet-tp9di2 ай бұрын
-5/4 ,-1
@AssuredSystems2 ай бұрын
Quadratic Equation wkth X=-5/4 and x=-1
@giannaleoci23282 ай бұрын
4x+5=0 x=-5/4 x+1=0 x=-1
@iamrisa182 ай бұрын
Just by looking at the problem..I already knew the answers right away 😌
@valerierobertson49122 ай бұрын
4
@ramesankd16042 ай бұрын
Nocammet*s
@ArthurAyala-n2j2 ай бұрын
x= -1 x= -5/4
@ChristopherdpenhaАй бұрын
Yes my dears, this John is JACKASS, specialise in make a mountain of a mole hill.
@Fensmiler2 ай бұрын
(4x+5)(x+1) (5x+6) I don't know
@iamrisa182 ай бұрын
There are two solutions: 4x+5=0 4x=-5 x=-5/4 Or x+1=0 x=-1
@dannichols6261Ай бұрын
@@iamrisa18 Yes, the 'problem' is already factored for us! Anything times zero equals zero. Therefore anything that makes either factor equal zero reveals one or another solution.
@iamrisa18Ай бұрын
@@dannichols6261 exactly 💯 👏🏾
@monkeydigs66962 ай бұрын
-1 I did this mentally lol. I’m just that cool 😎
@creeperchow29492 ай бұрын
Your name is Monkeydigs you are already cool
@creeperchow29492 ай бұрын
Most of us did it memtaly
@creeperchow29492 ай бұрын
I can't believe it spelled that wrong
@monkeydigs66962 ай бұрын
@@creeperchow2949 thanks I suppose but I was being sarcastic
@sekharb66512 ай бұрын
X=-5/4 ,-1
@teweldemebrahtu99012 ай бұрын
You like too much talking ,, why not answer shortly?
@jjmcq23272 ай бұрын
Dude like get like your own channel, and he did answer quickly.
@YvanStansfeld2 ай бұрын
Thanks man for standing up for me ,math is my passion appreciate you. I'm gonna start mental vedic mathematics I learned in India introduce to schools hopefully become a professor you know Anyway thanks brother .
@YvanStansfeld2 ай бұрын
479,678,349x7= 3,357,758,443
@YvanStansfeld2 ай бұрын
(77x4)x(2)÷4=154
@richardhole8429Ай бұрын
Why don't you crank up the speed to 2x or more?
@ArtVanAuggie2 ай бұрын
Don't talk, THINK. Make one of the polynomials zero. Minus 1 or minus 1.25 are blatantly obvious.
@jimdugan72402 ай бұрын
X = -1
@creeperchow29492 ай бұрын
I am 14 and it took me 10 seconds to figure out that x is equal to -1 To bad I suck at math only when I am at school
@dannichols6261Ай бұрын
Except that it's not ONLY equal to -1!! There is another valid solution: x=-5/4 also solves the equation. Should have taken 11 seconds.
@johnadams165726 күн бұрын
why would you want to solve for anything that equals ZERO?? why why ??
@bulwinkleАй бұрын
Comment for the algorithm.
@vasanthosangadi28962 ай бұрын
X= -1 or X = -5/4🙏🇮🇳🚩
@harrymatabal84482 ай бұрын
-5/4 or -1. But it took you more than 16 minutes. Dont give up your day job
@dawnradel90082 ай бұрын
X=0
@romanwondimu86962 ай бұрын
0
@matthewfrench88392 ай бұрын
Snooz……..,,😞this is why I never liked math class. Boring teachers! Most math teachers did not know how to make math come alive! Total turn off☹️🇺🇸😇