Nag Ashwin ke social media account pe kin logoko follow karta hai ye dekha 😢 uttar milgaya nag Ashwin communist or Mughals ka mahima Mandan karne vale Marxist historians ko follow karta hai
@legendpotatogaming63323 ай бұрын
@@yashjadeja2004 koi example?
@StudentUnion-nc1nw3 ай бұрын
Vaastav me naag nikla ye to😂
@PratikBorade3 ай бұрын
@@StudentUnion-nc1nw Aapne ek Video ki Link share ki thi, vo comment delete kyon kiya ?
@@PratikBorade mene delete ni kiya. Pata ni kuch technical issue aara h.
@hussi_1083 ай бұрын
Even if we ignore the political aspect of the film like you said, overall the film as a story perspective was very average, like there was no maturity in the film. It felt like they were deliberately trying to show that they can also make films like Hollywood and made a cheap copy of star Wars, dune , etc.
@PratikBorade3 ай бұрын
Bilkul sahi kaha aapane..
@aryansingh-zc8wb3 ай бұрын
Ashwathama looked serious and stable and a lot powerful
@pj-guwg43Y2 ай бұрын
@@aryansingh-zc8wb😂अगर वो भी ये मूवी देखेगा तो खुश नही होगा कि ये कितना गलत दिख रहे फ़िल्म में।😂
@chandrimachakraborty24362 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorade watched today on netflix story bilkul average thi. Prabhas was joke in the film and pointless cameo of disha. Apart from Amitabh Bachan, nothing was worth it. Mere Taraf se 5 stars bas.
@chimkandieducation3 ай бұрын
Totally agree with you 👍👍👍When Karna is introduced as most powerful Warrior in "Kalki 2898 AD" , I wasn't able to see the screen 🙂🙂🙂🙂
@chimkandieducation3 ай бұрын
@@saisumanthdss1919 according to Ashwadhama , shei Krishna and pandavas are his Enemy. Then why is he saving kalki ?
@GauravK-u6d3 ай бұрын
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
@knowledge-212343 ай бұрын
@@saisumanthdss1919I, ahabharata ashwathama hate karna and say you are not even a rather UT ardhrathi you are not capable to lead Gaurav sena
@prajwalshinde13663 ай бұрын
You are right weapon does not matter because power lies in the man himself. In Thor Ragnarok hela breaks mjolnir and thor feels helpless and weak without his hammer. Odin makes him realise that he is god of thunder and power is with him and he can fight without mjolnir and he fights the war with hela
@chimkandieducation3 ай бұрын
True 👍👍 Mukesh Khanna , on his KZbin channel, also said about these problems in the movie .
@bapinakumarbarad96733 ай бұрын
Mukesh khana ne ye v kaha tha ki Odisha or Bihar k log ye movie nahi samajh payenge. Wow, yani indirectly odisha k logo ko murkh bol rahe hay. Kya unhone odisha may bhagwan Sri jagannath ji k 5 mahan bhakt pancha sakha k dwara likhi gayi "Bhabiswa puran" or " malika" padhi hay. Ye padhli hoti to odisha k log Kalki Avatar k uper kitna jante hay inko pata chal jata.
@chimkandieducation3 ай бұрын
@@bapinakumarbarad9673 aap odisha se ho kya ?
@thannerulavanya41173 ай бұрын
I don't want to be disrespectful but he should not talk about mahabharat accuracy as br sir version is 40 to 50% wrong especially mahabharat katha
@chimkandieducation3 ай бұрын
@@thannerulavanya4117 yes. You're right . BR CHOPRA also showed karna as quite good , I don't know why .
@RajeshSarkar-so3ve3 ай бұрын
kalki is not ispired from mahabhartata instead it is a adaptation of urubhanga which is a markxist pov if mahabhabharata
@thannerulavanya41173 ай бұрын
But Marxist stupidity was not even created it is from 2 to 3 BC
@SumitMahato-fm6my3 ай бұрын
What's changes done in urubhanga from real Mahabharat Can u tell few plots
@RajeshSarkar-so3ve3 ай бұрын
@@SumitMahato-fm6my yeah urubhanga is like a kadambari/play written by bhasa, basically it justifies all the actions taken by duryodhana, shakuni an karna. These 3 evil characters are being humanised these days by leftists, the laughter of panchali to duryodhana , the chariot of arjun being moved instead of Krishna by karna these all nonsense are just part of some poetry,play,kadambari only but actual Mahabharata of vedvyas never contains these shit.Anyways Arjun is way way ahead of evil karna. In every battle before kurukshetra arjun defeated karna without any help from Krishna like battle of Virat,battle with gandharvas etc..
@SumitMahato-fm6my3 ай бұрын
@@RajeshSarkar-so3ve yea Idk people still believe in that moving Arjun chariot story It's nowhere mention in Mahabharat but BR Chopra Mahabharat was one of the biggest reason behind all these myths
@GauravK-u6d3 ай бұрын
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
@shrikantgore-wf5wf3 ай бұрын
मैने भी ये नोटिस किया प्रतीक भाई ,कोई भी symbol नहीं था
@arnabkashyap48503 ай бұрын
Mein v murkh darinda orthodox regressive mind ka hu bhgwan muje v buddhi de😔😔😔lgta murkhta ke daldal mein doob chuka hu pratik bhao apke sath
@sarthakSrivastava-ds2tq3 ай бұрын
Vo aise hi sarcasm me bol Diya tu itna seriously matle tu pura video dekh gadhe samjh pratik borade Bhai sach bol Raha hai kyu leftist woke ki mansik Ghulami kar rahe ho 😂😂😂😂
@pradeepsinghbhati-073 ай бұрын
वाह प्रतीक भाई, आपने जो कहानी बताई अगर वो होती तो शायद लोगो के दिमाग में कहानी छप जाती और शायद सबसे बड़ी हिट होती
@SanjuKumar-xb8ew3 ай бұрын
Eski ko bol na flim banye ke liya 🤣🤣🤣 jhatu youtuber sala esko to KGf movie pasand nahi aaye to kya ho gaya 😜
@gauravparag40453 ай бұрын
Exactly 💯🕉️🚩🇮🇳💕
@flaneur4517Ай бұрын
Karn papi thaa usne dropdi ko veshya kaha uska aapmaan kiya Abhimanu ko tadpa tadpa krr mara Duryodhan jaise papi ka sath diya
@himanshukushwaha50643 ай бұрын
kalki makers should consider this all points and make changes for kalki 2
@PratikBorade3 ай бұрын
Ab kya Changes karenge vo ? Shambala ko jaise unhone dikhaya hai usme ab badlaav kaise sambhav hain ?
@himanshukushwaha50643 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorade ha vo to nhi badla ja skta bhairva ko serious kr skte he, yaskin kon he , kalki avtar kese janm lega director ko hi change kr kar do
@krishnasai12323 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorademaybe he’s afraid that his HODs won’t be able get work after if they fully commit to our dharm. Certain wood don’t mind suppressing Hindu glory
@thannerulavanya41173 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorade If they want they can easily do that by just showing that PB character is a avatar of Lord Kaal Bhairava and ashwathama got confused in faces as he thought that he is karna he us one who can use vijay and same goes for karna vs arjun where it is his pov not the actual truth. I don't think Shambhala is a problem as they designed it with combination of Hindu and Buddhist symbols also it is last location where god exist as god is banned in that world by Yaskin and Kali it is confirmed in a comicbook strip released in SDCC and in movie that people are getting killed worshipping god, production designer of kalki that yaskin trying to potray himself as good that's why if you closely see Yashin and Lord Krishna atrie is bit same. Movie is brilliant but karna arjun thing was a problem for me as well but I hope nagi gives good explanation for everything in part 2 and 3
@GauravK-u6d3 ай бұрын
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
@XYZ-rm6xy3 ай бұрын
Pratik jii mai too Kalki 2898 AD movie kee pehle bahut exited thaa even plan bhi Kiya tha movie dekhne kee liye plan bhi Kiya thaa, lekin Karan kee overrated character pata chalne kee baad Mai khud Movie kaa plan cancel kar liya and I am very happy for that decision 😊😊😊
@LoneWolf-tk9em3 ай бұрын
कुछ नहीं भाई, download करके देख लेंगे 😄
@pavankalyan92323 ай бұрын
Film acha hai, dekho bhai. No body knows future. Also, So many guruji's doing tapsya for negative purpose. This is kalikal. We need to accept the truth.
@gauravparag40453 ай бұрын
@@pavankalyan9232watch full video please 🙏
@XYZ-rm6xy2 ай бұрын
@@pavankalyan9232 Dude remember there are immortals like Parasuram ji, Hanuman ji, and Ved Vyas jii also who are considered as Gurus. I know nowadays some Fake Babas are there who spoil our Sanathan Dharma, but please don't convey that all Gurus are bad🙏🙏🙏. And Yes According to our Scriptures In Kaliyug people loose their power so logically speaking if we want to do tapasya lot of strength is required then it is not possible to do tapasya. It would be better if you might have used Selfish Tantrik as they are the ones who are misusing our scriptures. Thanks for reading my comments patiently😊😊😊.
@XYZ-rm6xy2 ай бұрын
@@LoneWolf-tk9em 12th mee hun woo bhi CBSE mei, iss baar pattern difficult hoo Gaya. I don't want to waste my precious time watching this so called Sanathani Secular Film about Dystopian future. Waise Batadu kii Hindustani 2 kee Wajah see Bahut Time Waste hoo Gaya, isse Telegram mee dekha tha, woo bhi isliye kyonki woo mere Bachpan kee favourite Director Shankar kaa Film hai Aur 12th Padhai kee liye kitna Important hai yee too sab samjhte hai. Aur Haan Mai pehle hii decide karliya thaa, kii puree Saal mee sirf Indian 2 aur Kalki Theatre mein dekhunga aur Red Giant co producers, Kamal kee wajah see movie Telegram mein Dekha thaa(otherwise Netflix mein Dekh liya hotaa as they are Anti Sanathais). And Abhi decide kar liya kii Pratik Jii kee Game Changer review dekhne kee baad bas uss film koo dekhunga woo bhi Theatre mein. Hope you understand what I say 👍👍👍.
@Sadly950Ай бұрын
👍🏻 कर्ण को मोक्ष नहीं मिला जो बार बार जन्म ले रहा हैं 😂
@Binodkoiraala3 ай бұрын
finally ...isi kaa toh wait thaa... thank you so much for talking about this film"s philosophy ... film release ke din se wait kar raha thaa..
@marcusscott40243 ай бұрын
Itne chiranjeeviyon ke rahte karn ko wapas janm lene ki kya jaroorat pad gayi wakai samajh nahi aaya. Main expect kar raha tha ki bhagvan bhairav se kuch related hoga Prabhas ka character but seeing climax I was heavily disappointed. Jai Kaal Bhairav 🙏🏻
@SumitMahato-fm6my3 ай бұрын
Kyunki karna character ke through casteism hate badana hai😅
@sw41942 ай бұрын
@@SumitMahato-fm6my 😂👌🏻
@zroth37342 ай бұрын
सबसे हास्यास्पद तो यह है कि aswatthamaa को कर्ण का घनिष्ट मित्र दिखाया है, जबकि बहुत बार aswathhama ने कर्ण को मारने के लिए तत्पर हुआ था.. Kritvarma या कृपाचार्य को ले आते
@marcusscott40242 ай бұрын
@@zroth3734 भाई बॉलीवुड वालो के ज्ञान को कोई टक्कर नहीं दे सकता
@legendpotatogaming63323 ай бұрын
Mahanati toh Rajamouli ji ki one of favourite movie thi 2018 mein…Rajamouli ji ne Insta story bhi daali thi
@tanmaychavan2833 ай бұрын
Koi dusre ki vahiyat movie ko kuch nhi bol skta Rajamouli just being diplomatic nothing else
@shreyanshsharma-bt3ll3 ай бұрын
Pratik ne khud badhiya review diya tha 2018 me
@BhagyanagarUpdates3 ай бұрын
That's because of Savitri's story
@nationalist73473 ай бұрын
@@tanmaychavan283😂😂 Rajamouli is an atheist….and he is Hindu but don’t hate Muslims like u
@sewardquart96413 ай бұрын
Karan Arjun ke charan ke dhul barabar bhi nahi hai, evil, viel, bad friend, adharmi hai Karan, danveer hone se koi acha nahi ho jata, Ravan bhi to shiv bhakt tha, to kya wo acha ban gaya? Arjun maharathi hai, Pandu putr hai, Indra putr hai, krishna ke param mitr or bhakt hai, Pancho pandavo mein sabse mahan hai, Param krishna bhakt maharathi Arjun ki Jai. Hare krishn hare krishn krishn krishn hare hare hare ram hare ram ram ram hare hare.
@anearthdweller3 ай бұрын
arrey bhai itna sach mat bol nahi toh sonyputra karna ke fans aa jayenge bhaukne.
@sewardquart96413 ай бұрын
@@anearthdweller ek shlok atta nahi Mahabharata ka bolne se matlab hai unhe. Kintu mein nicha nahi dikha raha, unki bhi kya galti hai, sastro ko padhna to vilupt sa ho rakha hai. ye to dukh ka vishay hai ki is azzad bharat mein hamare itihas jaise ki ramayana or Mahabharata ko bus dekha jatta hai, padha nahi jatta, bahar ke desh jaise ki yunan ke log jo ub Christians hai phir bhi apne ancient Epics jaise ke illiad and Odyssey par garv karte hai.
@anearthdweller3 ай бұрын
@sewardquart9641wahi toh bhai Arjun jo swayam nara narayan ka avatar hai unhe compare karte hai ek adharmi se.
@sewardquart96413 ай бұрын
@@marvelfan7268 haan galat dikhaya hai. Wo log ek underdog character banane ke liye creative liberty liye the. Tv serial bure nahi hai par wo ache bhi nahi hai. Mahabharat Jan na hai to padhna padega, ajj tak ki sabse lambi Kahani hai mahabharat, Bible se 5 gunna jyada verses(shloka) hai usme, tv serials mein hamesha us time ki audience or government ke hisab se changes hote hai, Geeta press ki mahabharat padhiye bharata shri.
@marvelfan72683 ай бұрын
@@sewardquart9641thankyou bhaii time nikal ke jald hi pdhenge Ek baar kisi video me Pratik borade ne hi BR chopda ke mahabharat ki prashnsa ki thi to BR chopda ka Mahabharat dekha tha aur Ramanand Sagar ki shree krishna v dekha usme v karn ko achha btaya gya hai
@sanatanfactuals3 ай бұрын
To understand karna character in Mahabharat, it is important to understand the story of Nar-Narayan (Badrinath) and Dambhodbhava (Sahasra Kavacha).. What is relation Arjun-Krishna and Karna has.. Unless people know this, they cannot differentiate between good and bad.. But unfortunately, till now nothing has come to tell people this story..
@saikumarneeli86382 ай бұрын
Pratik Bhai, in the beginning of the movie, it was said that god was banned in Kaasi by Yaskin
@himanshukushwaha50643 ай бұрын
watching bhairava is annoying from starting till end
@gopinathanr33353 ай бұрын
While I was watching it in multiplex in Chennai most of the audience were irritated by Bhairava's cringe worthy introduction scene.
@RaviKumar-hk3bv26 күн бұрын
बढ़िया review pratik borade bhai आजकल के reviewer को शास्त्रों, स्मृतियों व पुराणों का घंटा पता नहीं है इसलिए ऊनको कुछ पता नहीं चलता ऐसे फिल्मों के बारे में। जिनको ज्ञान है ऊनको पता है करण धुरयोधन के बाद सबसे बड़ा Negativity or villain character था महाभारत में
@Abdulll7863 ай бұрын
india k historical movies bhi mythology jaise dikhte hai aur foreign k mythology movies bhi history jaise dikhte hai
@shubh_chandrakar93343 ай бұрын
Bollywood se kya ummeed karoge bhai Rajamouli bana skte hai Agar vo bahubali jaise banaye to 🙏🏻
@sarthakSrivastava-ds2tq3 ай бұрын
@@shubh_chandrakar9334Bhai ye Bollywood nahi Telugu cinema ki movie hai agar sahi mayne me Mahabharat ko sahi justice de sakte hai vo sirf ss rajamouli sir hai aur koi nahi
@Abdulll7863 ай бұрын
@@shubh_chandrakar9334I doubt after watching kalki that ki rajamouli ji bhi leftist k propoganda me phas gaye honge karna k lekar. Abb mujhe darr lagra kahi rajamouli ji bhi karna ko anti hero dikhaye. because he is part of this movie.
@leodas9103 ай бұрын
Next Prabhas movie is commercial entertainer and next is Spirit ... Only Sandeep Reddy Vanga could give proper comeback to Prabhas with Spirit
@mohit_narang1133 ай бұрын
Yes hope Prabhas will understand this
@thannerulavanya41173 ай бұрын
You may not agree but Prabhas Comeback happened with salaar it self. I am not Prabhas fan, PR or slave and you are also forgetting Raajasabh, prabhas hanu, loki 10
@localbanda36693 ай бұрын
Aapke dwara diya hua gyan itihas ke panno me darz Hoga Aap mahtma hai Aap kala ke guru hai Aap mahagyani hai Aap mahapurush hai
@arnabkashyap48503 ай бұрын
😂❤wah pratik bhao finally agaya detailed video meine toh aaasha hee chor diya.....chahliye der se toh der se aya toh sahi...now pratik bhao maharaja avesham ka video daaalenge yee hope karte h
@h_cuteducation96843 ай бұрын
मुझे महाभारत के विषय में इतना कोई ज्ञान नहीं मगर मुझे पहली बार यह पता चल रहा की कर्ण के प्रति सहानुभूति दिखाने का ये कारण भी हो सकता है....अब ऐसा महसूस कर रहा हूं कितनी स्वार्थी है ये दुनिया हर कोई अपने स्वार्थ का ही पक्षधर है चाहे वह वाम हो या दक्षिण आखिर सत्य क्या है? शायद कलयुग ही स्वयं में सत्य है🌔
@mohit_narang1133 ай бұрын
Phir bi andhe fans nhi samajge bhai you are way ahead of your times hope right wing will understand your importance
@bijoymondal6005Ай бұрын
😂I am sc but leftist called me tribal non hindu 😂.
@itsentertainment51663 ай бұрын
Many people are saying its Ashwatthama's POV so Karn was shown good But in Bhishm Parv Ashwatthama scolded karna In Go Haran Parv too Instead he asked Drona that Arjun is his friend so why he needs to fight him. NagAshwin is twisting Mahabharat
@SumitMahato-fm6my3 ай бұрын
Wahi toh movie ne karn aur ashwatamma ko friends dikhaya jabki uski friendship Arjun ke saath jaada thi😅 Even ashwatamma aur Arjun ne ek dusre ki kahi jagah taarif ki hai Aur ashwatamma toh apne pita ke marne ke pehle kabhi adharam ka samarthan nhi karte teh
@Aditya-cn3cp3 ай бұрын
मुझे ट्रेलर देख के ही कुछ अंदाजा लग गया था तो मैंने फिल्म ही न देखी😬
@surrenderbohara21643 ай бұрын
Nikal andhbhakt samajhne ke liye National mind Hona chahie
@akashmalde17463 ай бұрын
Bhai mere movie bohot zyada achhi he jaake dekh
@Aditya-cn3cp3 ай бұрын
@@surrenderbohara2164 स्वघोषित बुद्धिमान महोदय आप के पिता जी की मूवी थी क्या जो तकलीफ हो गई मेरा मन मैं देखू न देखू मेरे कमेंट सेक्शन में आके अपने विशेष छिद्र में आनंद की अनुभूति करने आए होंगे कुछ भी हो आप लोग किसी भी तरह फील कर लेते है🤣
@Aditya-cn3cp3 ай бұрын
@@surrenderbohara2164नेशनल माइंड 😂 😂 2000 cross krva rhe the hui ki na 😂
@chintanshastri40763 ай бұрын
Lucky you pratik bhai ne agar 7.5 star nai diye hote to main bhi kabhi nai dekhata ye bakwas propganda movie.
@anuraageessar_xАй бұрын
Sir, is film mein problem hi problem hai. Main ek full time Kalki Bhakt hoon. Unke beej mantra aur stotra ke madhyam se unka awahan kar raha hoon. Jo facts Kalki maharaj ke baare mein Shreemad Bhagawatam Kalki puran aur bhavishya puran mein diye haan unme se ek ka bhi prayog is film mein nahi kiya gaya. Pehle toh ye date 2898 AD ghalat hai. Correct date 428989 AD hai. Kyunki Kalyug 432000 saal tak chalega aur abhi sirf 5500 saal hue hain kalyug ko shuru hoke.
@Imasoulkind2 ай бұрын
2:29 Deepika's performance wasn't bad. Prabhas was bad, yes!!
@lazydamsel2 ай бұрын
With due respect, she had no scope for acting. Only 2 expressions throughout.
@Imasoulkind2 ай бұрын
@@lazydamsel Yes, I said she wasn't bad, but she isn't good enough also!!
@naitikkathiriya3 ай бұрын
Karn ko puri tarah se Villian kehna to galat hoga kyunki maa kunti ko unhone vachan dia tha akhir me ki we kisi bhi pandu putra ki hatya nahi karenge, ha Arjun k sath personal mamla tha!! (I'm not telling ki he was a good guy, but ha ye jarur he ki jivan me satya aur asatya ke bich bahut hi bada dharmsankat tha uske upar. Chahta tha ki duryodhan ka sath chodde lekin usne hi uski bahut badi madad ki thi islie shayad nahi chod paya) Baki apne jo bhi baate kahi film ka plot kya ho sakta tha, i totally agree, Ashwatthama ka character agar apne kie gaye gunaho se bhairava ko dharm ka gyan deta to ye bahut samajne jesi bat hoti!
@wickeddemon87993 ай бұрын
This didn't happened in Mahabharata ye tv serials me hi hai
@Rohit-ij7mb2 ай бұрын
Read Mahabharat book. Karn was adharmi and evil
@marathi57943 ай бұрын
आजकल To the point movie से जैसे डर लगता है film makers को इन्हे comedy , romance , songs जबरदस्ती चाहीए
@pavankalyan92323 ай бұрын
Naag Aswin is current generation vyda vaas or valmiki. He is very good narrator on Hinduism. If you don't believe watch his first movie on yevade subramaniam on Himalayas trekking.
@wickeddemon87993 ай бұрын
😂😂😂 Aryans should not have taught you southies Hinduism
@यदायदाहिधर्मस्य-ढ2द2 ай бұрын
किसी और रिलीजन को लेकर तुमने ऐसे ही तुलना कर दी होती तो अब तक वह तुम्हारी गर्दन उड़ा चुका होता😡😡😡😡
@यदायदाहिधर्मस्य-ढ2द2 ай бұрын
नाग अश्विन की तुलना तुम वेदव्यास से कर रहे हो, चलो मैं तुम्हारे पापा की तुलना शिन-चैन और डोरेमोन से कर देता हूं चलेगा???
@XYZ-rm6xy2 ай бұрын
@@pavankalyan9232 first of all remember Nag Ashwin is just a Director who takes films, Don't Compare him With Maharishi Valmiki and Maharishi Ved Vyas jii, they were born in the Era of Lord Ram and Lord Krishna and wrote our Vedic Itihasas Ramayana and Mahabharata.
@Rohit-ij7mb2 ай бұрын
Nag Aahwin is Valmiki??? 😂 Lol. Stop insulting Valmiki Rishi and Ved vyas
@pradeepsethi903 ай бұрын
Karna had no redeeming qualities in Mahabharata. He supports Duryodhana at every step in every decision. Only people who haven't even read a single shlok of Vyasa Mahabharata say Karna was a great character. You can't say you like Karna and then criticize Duryodhana because they were the same, hence their friendship bloomed so much.
@yogibhati3447Ай бұрын
I can feel how deeply prateek bhai u world towards awakening sleeping Hindus, i normally don't comments to any content but your content and hard work make me helpless to do, hai Sri ram, keep it up
@krishnachaitanya5003 ай бұрын
Miriyam is waiting for KALKI, 10th of avatar of lord Vishnu, that should be problem to ANTI SANATHANIS
@kumarabinash55053 ай бұрын
Mahanati is a good movie. The regressive aspect is there in every religion. So what do you want???? Dont show it, if it's a hindu family???? I must say, the selective targeting happens in movies. But, that does not mean anyone shows regressive hindu family is leftist.
@PratikBorade3 ай бұрын
Hindu bachchiyo ko chhod do.. unka Bhala kisme hai ye unke Mata-pita dekh lenge.. Nag Ashwin jaise kisi ko Humari bachchiyo ko Mata-pita ke viruddha bhadkane ki koi aavashyakta nahi hai.. Aur vaise bhi agar itne hi bade Liberal ho to yaha Jeher kyon ugal rahe ho aap ? Aapko to meri Abhivyakti ki Aazadi ka samman karna chahiye.. aap kyon meri aavaj dabana chahte hain ?
@madhavjaju42472 ай бұрын
@@PratikBoradeI agree with you on every word yu spoke about kalki.. But ur above comment is I strongly disagree with that comment is reflection of ur deeply rooted regressive patriarchy mindset.. aur har kisi ke maa baap ache hi ho ye zaroori ni hai, koyi bi 100% right ni hota hai aur same way apne society me bi bohut khamiya hai n we need to address it n only thn we can improve
@thedescanteer2 ай бұрын
@@madhavjaju4247 Here comes a bhagwa feminist. Lol. Maze ki baat toh yeh hai ki Hindu khud kab Marxist ban gaye leftist media aur academia ke influence mein unko pata hi nahi chala. Ghar pe Ram Ram Radhe Radhe japte hain aur bahar "regressive patriarchy" jaise subalternist (3rd wave Marxism) propaganda terminology use karte hain jaahil. Laanat hai.
@pratik7613 ай бұрын
Correctly analyzed Hindu hate in the movie is so apparent that the director hates Hindu culture so much.
@bitu863 ай бұрын
Kaha dikha hindu hate mujhe bhi batao
@sneekpeek6393 ай бұрын
🤡🤡🤡
@wickeddemon87993 ай бұрын
@@bitu86twisting Mahabharata is anti-hindu
@Glitch181923 ай бұрын
Ye leftist log negativity se is kadar pyaar krte hai inhe agar gulaab ka phool bhi doge na tab bhi inka dhyaan uske kaanto prr hi jayega.
@truthseeker96643 ай бұрын
Indian movies are suffering from substandard or mediocrity at best. Chaprigriri is prioritized in the name of appealing to mass but in actual people in the industry (except few) are incompetent and less intelligent to make high quality films.
@ShivShakti-nm2rk3 ай бұрын
The best thing you find out is that yaskin was symbolised as Krishna.That was Just Brilliant man .Same was done in Karnan .Kala etc thanks
@SunnySinsEntertainment3 ай бұрын
Ab mand buddhi valo ke pet mai jalan hone vali hai pratik sir ❤😂
@Logicc-Gate2 ай бұрын
मुझे तो यह फिल्म देखकर बहुत निराशा हुई थी।
@RajeshKumar7179Ай бұрын
Prabhas is a natural disaster for all movies nowadays, his acting is very bad and he doesn't fit the role. Every now and then Hi & Bye funny scene, mentioning massage for no reason. It was extreme cringe worthy. I felt like throwing the can of soda right at the Movie theater screen. If people say Navratri is not Hindu Festival then they all should receive a slap of a lifetime. Of all the Festival, Navratri eminates more Hinduism then anything else.Navratri and Diwali is such a Beautiful festival that it literally recharges everyone and that blissful experience you get that cannot be expressed by words. Prathik Bhai, Forget about all the !d!0T trolls, Nobody cares for them and every Sanathani in the world eminates similar feelings as you do so don't worry.
@theexplorers4523 ай бұрын
Pratik Bhai telugu me karna ka movie hai..which is like Bible to karna mastrubators..name is DANA VEERA SURA KARNA.. IN Which script was written by telugu DRAVIDIAN VAADI.. NTR SIR DONE IT TO promote south politics like Tamil karnan movie ..for his political benefits .voh movie dekho aap ka pura jawaab milega...
@BhagyanagarUpdates3 ай бұрын
Not exactly, Karna's role was elevated from the translations of Vyasa Bharatha in all regional versions since 11th century medival times
@nationalist73473 ай бұрын
😂😂 NTR is Dravidian vadi😂😂….what a joke just look at his political costume…he has Rudraksha with orange dress(later Thackeray copied NTR Dress look)….even Vajpayee used to behave like secular and NTR is the one who created first BJP govt in centre…
@theexplorers4523 ай бұрын
@@nationalist7347 script writer is not sr.ntr.. he collaborated with a hardcore Dravidians then ..who wrote dramas. Of that sort...in telugu .. to promote regionalism ntr collabed with those forces for political gain
@nationalist73473 ай бұрын
@@theexplorers452😂😂 just go and check credits it is written directed and even produced by NTR himself and he even played Arjuna karna Krishna on the same movie😂😂….just check first…if u bully guys like Ashwin no one will produce a Hindu movie and go to do rom com…because if guys like you even Rajamouli is afraid to make Mahabharat ….bcoz u idiots and leftist both will bully him
@subanand2 ай бұрын
Pratik bhai.... Telugu movies have a long tradition of showing Karna as an anti-hero and not a villain. This is not based on Leftist leaning but on an old telugu version of Mahabharat written around 500 years ago. All telugu films showing Karna use this version of Mahabharat as a reference point. Its nothing to do with leftist ideology that came out in the 20th century. Regarding how Ashwathama influences the Prabhas character, maybe more details will be there in the sequel. Where was the time for all that in the first part. Here the story is about how to protect Sum80 and help birth of Kalki. They just cannot show Prabhas in tapasya for many years to gain all powers and knowledge. It wont make sense.
@sudarshanupadhyay64053 ай бұрын
Support!! I don't know what to say..... I really waited for this film and I was also a bit disappointed when I first watch the movie ...maybe because I expected something more and still happy for the grand representation of short time Mahabharata scenes and reference. But you are also right about the hidden ideology... I don't know what to say ... sometimes i became hopeless from all but still want to see the hindu epics on the grand scale..... let's see what they deliver in second part.
@superhero76753 ай бұрын
कल की फिल्म जब देख रहा था तब सब कुछ समाने देख रहा था पर आम लोगों को ये सब नहीं समझ आ रहा है
@subhamsahu63423 ай бұрын
Akhanda is best south indian superhero inspired from a gyat aghori Har harMahadev 🕉️ 🕉️ 🕉️
@wrider37283 ай бұрын
It is actually not but ok its ur opinion
@subhamsahu63423 ай бұрын
@@wrider3728 what's actually not
@RvsaysssАй бұрын
या लोकांच्या बेसिक मध्येच खुप मोठा प्रोब्लेम आहे.. किती ही डोकं फोडल तरी हे लोक सुधरायला तयार नाही.
@@itsentertainment51661150 core collection dekh ke hater 😂😂😂
@mahendrabhati2693 ай бұрын
movie wasn’t great
@guptaji91302 ай бұрын
Aaj dekh ke complete kiye santaan dharm ko acha nhi dikhaya....
@Layman_O23 ай бұрын
Jab Convent school me padh ke bade honge to vo bacche hamare itihas ko mythology aur bible ke idea and view se hi movie banayenge
@PlusMinus73773 ай бұрын
Aap film ko criticise kar rahe hai toh log aapko gaali dete hai but agar koi goraa iss film ko review karte waqt criticise kartaa toh tab yehi ke log bolte ki foreigner sahi bol raha hai 😅.
@sarthakSrivastava-ds2tq3 ай бұрын
Isliye India ek murkho ka desh hai ye main nahi ye Gore angrez log bolte hai sahi baat bhi hai India me murkh log zyada hai isliye unpad hai apni intelligence ka use karne ke bajay leftist woke logo ki baat me brainwash ho jaate hai ye dukh ki baat hai par ye harsh reality hai log sirf chatukar ban rahe hai
@vamsikrishna38553 ай бұрын
8:30 what is curious is not only Hindu Rishi has not been shown by the director , I have not seen a Islamic mullah too. May be we should thank him for that as Islam completely denies any avatar or rebirth concept.
@PratikBorade3 ай бұрын
Pure Shambala ko Mariam control karti hai bhai..
@vamsikrishna38553 ай бұрын
@@PratikBoradePratik Bhai.. this forced secularization of leading characters with Christian names is a serious problem. Shayad sabhi panth ko acceptance mey laane ke liye mool katha ko hee badalna galat hai.. The least I hope is in sequel the so called Karna is shown repenting for the choices he made during dwapar yuga and remorse by taking corrective actions in this punarjanm as bhairava.. otherwise it utter waste of opportunity other than some decently done special effects and battle sequences. The cowardice or timidity to show complete Hindu ethos by Hindu directors (Telugu directors are most Hindu remember no Tamil or Kerala director even goes this far as it’s too Hindu for them) is a problem and we have our own shackles to break out of this forced secularization mould. Love to see your comment on this Pratik bhai..
@nationalist73473 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorade😂😂 may be she got ghar wapsi😂…just change your perspective…
@thannerulavanya41173 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorademariam is actually a god in south
@gauravparag40453 ай бұрын
10:49 बिल्कुल सही बात है भूत कमीनी है यार यह डायरेक्टर हिंदुओं के दुश्मन है और लोग नहीं समझ नहीं रहे😢😮
@vishalparvatikar16063 ай бұрын
Pratik Bhai Should start a podcast and should invite all directors and film makers who spread propaganda and are secular ! I'm really excited if it's happening !
@shinde-513 ай бұрын
*RDJ returning as a Dr. Doom,* *your views on it??*
@flaneur4517Ай бұрын
Ye log le deke karn ko shrest batayenge Inko arjun ki shrestata se problem hai
@abhirupchakraborty90273 ай бұрын
आप जितना भी समझाए, आजकल ये युवा जो न महाभारत रामायण पढ़ते हैं और न ही उन्हें घंटनयों का कोई ज्ञान हैं या जानने की स्वदिच्छा हैं, वो इन कपोलकल्पित चित्रों को ही सच मानते हैं। कल्कि को अगर आप केवल एक छायाचित्र के अनुसार देखे तो ठीकठाक है मगर फ़िल्म एक मध्यम है जिस के द्वारा चित्रकार अपने सोच को जगत के समीप अभिव्यक्त करता है। अगर आप शुरू से गहन अध्ययन करे तो अश्वत्थामा का जैसे चित्रायन किया गया है वो ही गलत है। अश्वत्थामा ने भूपतित मुमूर्षु दुर्योधन को ये वचन देता है की वो पंच पांडव का सर काट कर लेके आएगा और इसी कारण से वो रात्रि में पांडव शिविर में जा के पहले धृष्टद्युम्न और शिखंडी का वध करता है और उसके उपरांत शायित पंच पांडव पुत्रों (द्रौपदी के पुत्रों) का वध करता है (अनजाने में)। पांडव नहीं थे तो वो पांडव पुत्रों का ही शिरोच्छेद करके दुर्योधन के पास लाता है और दुर्योधन समझ जाता है की अश्वत्थामा ने क्या पाप किया है। वो उसको कोसते हुए ही अपना प्राण त्याग देता है और अनुसोचना के कारण अश्वत्थामा मुनीवर महर्षि वेदव्यास के पास जाता है शरण मांगने। वहा पांडव श्री कृष्ण सहित आते हैं और तब अश्वत्थामा एक सूखे तृण को लेके ब्रह्मास्त्र का ध्यान करता है और पांडवों की और भेजता है। उसे रोकने के लिए अर्जुन भी श्री कृष्ण के आदेशानुसार ब्रह्मास्त्र चलता है और दोनो ब्रह्मास्त्र के संघर्ष से सृष्टि का विनाश रोकने के लिए वेदव्यास अपने तपोबल से अस्त्रों को रोकते है। अर्जुन को वापस लेने के लिए बोलने पर अर्जुन अस्त्र को वापस लेते है मगर अश्वथामा बोलता है उसे वापस लेना नहीं आता। अतः वो पांडवों का कुल नाश करने के लिए उसे उत्तरा के गर्भ में छोड़ता है और गर्भ में ही अभिमन्यु पुत्र का निधन हो जाता है। श्री कृष्ण तब उसके प्राण लौटाने का प्रण लेते है और अश्वत्थामा को अमरत्व का अभिशाप देते है और उसकी मणि भीमसेन उतार लेते है जिससे अश्वथामा की तेज लुप्त हो जाती है। श्री कृष्ण उत्तरा के पुत्र को पुनः जीवित करते है और जीवन मृत्यु की परीक्षा उत्तीर्ण करने के कारण उसका नाम परीक्षित पर ता है। फ़िल्म में कुछ भी नहीं दिखाया गया। बेन हूर - आ टेल ऑफ क्राइस्ट जो विलियम वालेस की किताब है और १९४९ में विविध पुरस्कार विजेता एक फ़िल्म के रूप में विलियम वाइलर ने बनाया, उस में जीसस क्राइस्ट का चेहरा नहीं दिखाया गया। उसी का अनुकरण से यहां श्री कृष्ण का चेहरा नहीं दिखाया गया क्यों की निर्देशक नाग अश्विन उससे बोहुत प्रभावित थे (इंटरव्यू में उन्हों ने कहा था)। अब अगर प्रभास की बात करे तो उसको एक ऐसी फ़िल्म चाहिए थी जो उसके डूबते करियर को पुनर्जीवित कर सके। वही काम इस फ़िल्म ने किया। जब फ़िल्म का निर्देशक ही महाभारत को पढ़ा नहीं हो और मन में कम्युनिज्म और हलेलुया घूमता हो तो फ़िल्म भारतीय दृष्टिकोण से बनेगा कैसे? अध्यात्म गहन अध्ययन का विषय है और उस का चित्रायन करने के लिए विश्वास होना आवश्यक है। तबोबल, मंत्र शक्ति, अस्त्रशस्त्र - इनको समझ ने के लिए धैर्य और विश्वास चाहिए जो आधुनिक निर्देशकों में नहीं हैं। उनको अपनी संस्कृति पे गर्व ही नहीं हैं तो उनसे ये अपेक्षा करना की वो इन विशोयों को धागे में पिरो कर एक अद्भुत चित्र प्रस्तुत करेंगे ये कामना करना व्यर्थ है। जब की इन विषयों को अगर सठिक प्रस्तुत किया जाए तो अत्यंत सुंदर फ़िल्म बन सकता है। और कर्ण का चरित्र तो सालों से वामपंथियों के लिए एक प्रोपेगेंडा का माध्यम हैं क्यों की कर्ण को कभी भी एकदम सत्यानुसार प्रस्तुत नहीं किया गया। सूत कोई गाली है ही नहीं क्यों की सूतों का महाभारत में विशेष सम्मान के साथ वर्णन हैं। परंतु उसकी उपस्थापना सर्वदा एक वामपंथी प्रोपेगंडा के अनुसार ही होता आया हैं। अब कर्ण को मुक्ति प्राप्त होने के बाद कहां से अचानक आ गया ये तो नाग अश्विन के मस्तिष्क में विराजमान नाग देवता भी नहीं जानते। अतः कुछ आशा न रख के एकबार देख लो और भूल जाओ!
@gourdolui28933 ай бұрын
Shows two Hindus Sadhus just for 2-3 seconds during showing Shambhala
@jitenderKumar-bi9fo3 ай бұрын
Movies and directors like these are destroying our youth and the sad part is ke MATA PITA in sab pe dhyan nahi dete. Chalo puri mahabharat nahi padha sakte, atleast ye toh btao ke kon achcha and kon bura hai. Jai Shri Krishan
@1bhanuja3 ай бұрын
Same thing they showed in Hanuman too.. the lead character is very similar to Kalki's Bhairava
@gnaeusrodn26373 ай бұрын
I don't think Nag Ashwin would have thought this deeply when writing the story...
@PratikBorade3 ай бұрын
Galat, usne bahut deeply socha hai.. filmmakers murkh nahi hote.. soch samajh kar Yaskin ko Bhagwan Krishna ka Negative roop dikhaya hai.. iske bare me ek video bhi hai KZbin par Kalki ke production designer ka..
@gautamkiran5593 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorade Bhai please don't watch movies which so problematic to your mental health. Just live your life happy.🙂
@gauravparag40453 ай бұрын
10:49 बिल्कुल सही बात है भूत कमीनी है यार यह डायरेक्टर हिंदुओं के दुश्मन है और लोग नहीं समझ नहीं रहे😢😮
@sarthakSrivastava-ds2tq3 ай бұрын
@@gautamkiran559tum chinta mat karo pratik borade Bhai ko kuch nahi hoga vo thik uska mental health bhi sahi hai tum sirf leftist woke se dur raho unke brainwash hone se bacho
@amitprupadhyay26 күн бұрын
I totally agree with your perspective
@Vegitable6213 ай бұрын
I was of the opinion director was targeting western and Christian audience all over the world and gave him benefit of doubt until you mentioned about his secularism in Mahanati. The ultimate litmus test to find if he is a secular or crypto or Dharmic person is to see if he promotes Karma and Moksha or true believers and hell and heaven
@thannerulavanya41173 ай бұрын
I think he is trying to show Karma cycle where grey to black characters Mahabharat are getting a chance for redemption
@GauravK-u6d3 ай бұрын
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂
@rahuldev-gn3ip3 ай бұрын
Pratik bhai aapke jaisa you tuber ya reviewers ko nhi aap mahaan ho bhai Aapko communist log dabane ki koshish bahut karenge darane ki koshish bhi karenge but aap pichhe mat hatna Mahadev ka Ashirwad sadaiv hi bana rahe aap par or aapke pure pariwar par Jai Shree Ram 🙏🚩🚩🚩
@kalkivani3 ай бұрын
महान दिव्य आत्मा के श्रेष्ठ विश्लेषण कि प्रशंसा करते हैं।
@harinjoshi95663 ай бұрын
Very eye opening and enlightening video Pratik Bhai!! Jay Shree Krishna!!🙏🙏
@adityaanand33353 ай бұрын
Har Har Mahadev pratik ji 🔱🙏🏻
@divyashanti49203 ай бұрын
Without promotion Kalki collected 1000 crores+ even have mixed reviews this is something Prabhas stardom matters....but if any of his film is really good and liked by everyone then may be collection would be something else which cannot expect😅
@ARRana-pj4hw3 ай бұрын
I watched the movie only for prabhas,and came disappointed,my respect for adipurush has increased,they didn't insult god and dharm paksh ,here they openly told Karn was the official hero of Mahabharata
@inspiregrowth90222 ай бұрын
These people knowingly create such probl€ms. Don't tell me they dont have enough funds to consult indic scholars, etc. They want to portray wrong stories.
@PradeepKumar-b7i6v3 ай бұрын
Koi problematic nhi hai
@sarthakSrivastava-ds2tq3 ай бұрын
Bahut problematic hai
@sarthakSrivastava-ds2tq3 ай бұрын
Bahut problematic hai
@GauravK-u6d3 ай бұрын
Prashant Dhawan has explained difference between "AD" and "CE". Using "AD" means its Christian but using "CE" is bit secular. But still foolish Hindus watched it without knowledge.😂😂
@sauravpramanik49802 ай бұрын
Prabhas and deepika's characters in the movie were cringe...
@kirtiranjanmishra713 ай бұрын
"NAAG ASWIN" IS A NAAG 🐍,IT PROVED 😂 CRINGE MOVIE THAA "KALKI 2898" ,PAR KYA KRE KOI OTHER OPTION HIN NAHIN HAI
@jashb.majmudar20063 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for this video Sir. Huge fan. Love you.
@MRBharvad-r6h3 ай бұрын
જય શ્રી કૃષ્ણ મોટાભાઇ 🙏
@abhishekmittal89143 ай бұрын
Pratik bhai aapka review mujhe youtube pe sabse honest aur perfect lgta hai Jai shree ram🙏🏻 jai hind 🇮🇳
@riteshsangewar88963 ай бұрын
Bhai pandav ne bhi aapani patni ko dav me. Lagaya tha to vo dharmaraj kaise . Padhav ki Vijay isliye Hui kyu ki bhagwan shri krishna sath the .
@Nitishkumar_mahto453 ай бұрын
Bhagwan sri krishna sath the par kyon sath the ye nahi pata hai tumhe?
@SumitMahato-fm6my3 ай бұрын
Bhool se kiya gaya paap aur ahankar mein kiya gaya paap mein antar hota hai aur pandavo ko bhi uska tand mila Par Sri Krishna pandav ishi liye teh kyunki pandav dharm ke paksh mein teh unhone kabhi Raj paane ke liye yudh nhi kiya Aur duryodhan aur samarthan karne walo ahankar mein kaayi paap kiye Duryodhan toh 5 gaav bhi nhi de paya toh aese insaano log hero mante sach mein kaliyug hi chal raha hai😅
@kalpanayadav19063 ай бұрын
आपसे पूर्णतः सहमत हुं
@harinjoshi95663 ай бұрын
Jay Shree Ram Pratik Bhai! Sach bolu to bachpan me jab school ke pathyapustako me aur kahi saari idhar udhar ki kahaani ke kaaran main kaafi brain wash ho gaya tha aur Karna ko hi sabse positive character maanne laga tha aur bahoot saare alag alag tv shows me karna ka mahima mandan shuru kar diya gaya aur arjun ko thoda grey shade dene lage wampanthi producers aur main kaafi had tak brainwash ho chuka tha. Fir dhire dhire aapke channel ke madhyam se aur Ami Ganatra Ji ke bahoot saare videos dekhe aur meri aankhe khul gayi aur sahi itihaas ko jaanne ko prerit hua aur bodh hua ki karna ek negative character tha jisse wampanthio ne itihaas badal kar hero bana diya. Aur Mahabharat ke main hero Arjun hi the. Ab yeh Kalki ke makers bhi Karna ka Mahimamandan karne me lage hue hai. Telugu filmmakers se yeh bilkul expect nahin kiya gaya tha his telugu film industry ne humar purano se judi bahoor saari filme banayi hai bina kisi ched chad kiye. Aur Bharat ki tamam film industries me sabse zyada apne roots se aur sanskriti se judi koi film industry hai to woh keval Telugu industry hi hai. Yeh bahoot dukh ki baat hai ki telugu industry me wokism ka virus dheere dheere ghoosne laga hai. Shyam Singharoy bhi ek bahoot hi ghinoni film thi jisse bollywood ke elite critics ne bhi gungaan gaaye the. Yeh sach me bahoot chinta ka vishay hai. Bhagwan Shree Krishna ne kabhi bhi Ashwatthama ko yeh nahin kaha tha ki tum mere dasme avatar ko bachaoge aur prayashcheet karoge. Yeh sab makers ne apne man ka kachra daal diya aur jab Mukesh Khanna ne is baat ke liye film ka virdodh kiya to unhe saare youtube ke samosa critics nochne lage aur roast karne waale videos banane lage. Yahi dikhaata hai in sab ki ghinoni mansikta. Jay Shree Krishna. 🙏🙏
Kabhi kisi kaalme DHARMA ki jeet nahi hui, Jo jeet gaya wahi DHARMA ho gaya
@anime-station18983 ай бұрын
Last me Yaskin ( kali ) *"jaganath ke rath ka chakra "* dialogue ka kya sense tha use bhagwan vishnu se compare kiya hai Edit - Kalki production designer Nitin Chaudhary ne khud ye confirm Kiya hai ki Yaskin ko Negative shade of Krishna dikhana
@sahilnayak83253 ай бұрын
Bhai uske andar Jo sirum he vo bhagnvan kalki ka ansh hi he isliye Aisa he
@thannerulavanya41173 ай бұрын
@@anime-station1898 no bro dialogue writer of kalki told that the meaning of that is yaskin is going to kill sum 80 and Kalki
@anime-station18983 ай бұрын
@@thannerulavanya4117 Nahi *Kalki* ke production designer ne ye khud confirm kar diya ki last scene ka idea tha Yaskin ko negative shade of Krishna dikhana he also said we can see similarities between them
@santhoshreddy9713 ай бұрын
Bhai tumko much nahi patha..aur vo dialogue telugu me bolne se acha hota he....isme bola tha ki jagannath ratha chakralu vasthunnay vasthunnay...means deepika is the rath and she is coming with sri krishna....said dialogue writer himself....and that production designer explanation is yaskin is not sri Krishna in -ve shade it is yaskin is complete opposite of sri krishna iska matlab he sri krishna ke guna se complete opposite he....@@anime-station1898
@thannerulavanya41173 ай бұрын
@@anime-station1898 Bro I say the whole interview and production designer didn't anything like that instead he said he see yaskin as a fallen god and atire similarity between Lord Krishna and Yaskin from pretty clear as in the they both were white clothes so that he can show himself as god or king and the dialogue things told previously. I think Lord Krishna evil side was used for click bait but if they showing yaskin and Lord Krishna same then can you give the time stamp if it is true then also adds to my problems kalki
@rajumishra80803 ай бұрын
Mein bhi aa gaya jaan ne ke liye....👍👍👍👍👍jai shree ram 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
@phirmik253 ай бұрын
Namaste Prateek Ji ! It's really satisfying that you explained the philosophy in details. Prateek Ji, aapke samajh aur aapke geheri Bharatiya Vichar ko koti koti Pranam 🙏🙏 !! 🚩 Vande Mataram !!
@mohnishdevda84353 ай бұрын
Aapko bahut bahut dhanyawad pratik bhai... aapne mere mann ki baat kahi hai...jai shree ram..🙏🙏🙏🚩
@shekharpandey60523 ай бұрын
भैया जब मैंने अंतिम में देखा की प्रभास का कैरेक्टर कर्ण है , और उसे जिस तरह से दिखाया गया , मुझे बहुत निराशा हुई की एक विलन को हीरो के रूप में दिखाया जा रहा है
@AshutoshKumarGupta-i1f2 ай бұрын
That's why I didn't watch it in theatres.. There is something wrong with Prabhas I guess
@ComfortCalpron2 ай бұрын
Sir, yaskin khudko bhagwan samajh raha hai, isiliye wo sab bhagwan wale astra istemaal karna chahta hai.
@PratikBorade2 ай бұрын
@@ComfortCalpron Thodi Sharm kar lo.. Nag Ashwin jaise third class mentality vale Vampanthi ko defend karne ke liye agli bar koi better Argument lekar aana !
@ComfortCalpron2 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorade defend nahi bass perspective tha bata diya. Aisa ek raja bhi reh chuka hai jo khudko vishnudev ka avataar bula raha tha. Aur shayad bhairava karn nahi shivji ka avatar ho. Kyuki kal Bhairav ka jikra hua tha. Aur DNA clonning bhi ho sakti hai like boruto me hai kashin koji
@ComfortCalpron2 ай бұрын
@@PratikBorade aapka point bhi sahi hai. Hindu bhi koi hona chahiye tha jaise yaskin ke paas manni tha
@vedantsrivastava46433 ай бұрын
Sahi mein....itne problematic themes ko badhava har jgah milta ja ra hai...aur log unhi themes ko pasand kr re hai....hum Hindus aaj itne divided hai aur itne influenced hai in leftist marxist propaganda se ki bohot dukh hota hai. Especially youth aur UPSC students mein.
@LoneWolf-tk9em3 ай бұрын
मुझे पहले ही doubt था, इसलिए में देखने नहीं गया; क्यूंकि पूरी Liberal Gang (Nagshwin, Dipika, Kamal Hasan etc.) इस film में included है और में अपने पैसे Sickular Gang को नहीं दूँगा I
@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo3 ай бұрын
Watch kalki it's great movie I really loved it don't listen to others. Mahabharata, which doesn't have same story, have different thinkings.
@itsentertainment51663 ай бұрын
@@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo All versions of Mahabharat are similar in all of them Karna has been shown evil From Bori CE, KGM, C Rajgopalachari, Penguin Publication, Ramesh Menon, Gita Press all of them even some foreign authors as well BUT I don't remember their names Kalki is bad it is not based on Mahabharat
@LoneWolf-tk9em3 ай бұрын
@@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo No thanks, I don't want to waste my money on Anti-Hindu Propaganda
@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo3 ай бұрын
@@itsentertainment5166 how can you say Karna is evil ? Please do research properly
@itsentertainment51663 ай бұрын
@@DailyNewsNepal-kw2yo I mentioned the name of all Mahabharat just search on google like this Mahabharat pdf Internet archive You will get access and read yourself Read all the versions of Mahabharat unabridged translation And Geeta Press Hindi as well You will get to know why I called him so(evil).
@PlusMinus73773 ай бұрын
Sach bataau toh movie dekhne mein accha toh lagtaa hai graphics action visuals etc but mereko yeh ek sastaa madmax movie lagaa aur Messiahvaad ko promote karne waala movie zyada lagaa. Hindu dharm messiahvaad ko promote kabhi bhi nahi kiye hain. Jab bhagwaan kalki janm bhi lenge toh kisiko bhi pataa nahi chalegaa ki unhone janm kab liyaa. Jab bhagwaan Ram aur bhagwaan Krishna neh bhi janm kiyaa tha tab bhi koi yeh nahi jaantaa tha ki woh bhagwaan hain. Jab valmiki ji neh ramayan likhaa aur vedvyas ji neh Mahabharat tab logo ko pataa chalaa. Overall movie aisaa nahi hain ki pasand nahi aayegaa par agar movie ko madmax jaisaa hi banaana tha toh bhagwaan kalki ka concept nahi lete, aur agar liye toh post apocalyptic world aur messiahvaad promote karne ki kya zarurat thi. Upar seh karn ko hero dikhaa rahe hain😅😅, ashwathama khud karn ko hate karte thain.Karn asal mein homelander ka baap tha(in nature) usko yeh vaampanthi log promote karte hain par bhagwaan Krishna ko galat portray karenge jabki sabse zyada dard unhone hi apne life mein jhelaa par woh villian nahi bane. Agar main kalki movie banaata toh main batman tone ka theme ka movie banaataa.
@casualgamer45883 ай бұрын
wo shiv bhakt bhi nahi tha Valmiki Ramayan medin kahin mentioned nahi hai ki wo Shiv ji ka bhakt hoga
@inspiregrowth90222 ай бұрын
Jab itihaas ko palatne ki koshish ho to samajh lena vinaash ka samay shuru ho chuka hai.
@AISA-d3g3 ай бұрын
Problem of mine is kalki film story was average Just chasing throught movie And .i dont think people would believe that they are being oppersed or their freedom is stolen in kaliyug kali will create his religion i think so And idea of complex is so stupid there will be no rich or poor only greed hatred violence And i want shambala people on a journey to find their history past and spread hindu knowledge and religion . And in all the difficulties and problems kalki bhagwan will born Prabash as karna was forced karna wasnt even needed for story
@adityarajsingh53353 ай бұрын
Dravidian विचारधारा को counter नहीं किया गया। Korean War का उदाहरण नही दिया गया।।
@CVA16033 ай бұрын
bhai, jab me movie dekhne jaata hun toh mere personal vichaar ghar par chhod aataa hun… Yeh movie toh hollywood se inspired hai… 2100 me hi itni garmi hogi ke servival mushkil ho jaayegi… 2800 me toh kya hoga woh scientifically soch lo… Jisne nuclear bomb banaya woh bhi tapsya hi thi… Tapsaya ko aap kaise define kar te ho, woh bhi jaruri hai… We don’t have commandments so there is no “siddhant”… Jaise sach ka koi bhi rup ho sakta hai waisse bhavishya bhi kisi bhi rup me aa sakta hai… aisa jaruri nahi ki jo hume pasand hai vaise humare saamne aaye… Life is very brutal… Kuchh bhi ho sakta hai…🙏🏻
@nillchowdhury806Ай бұрын
Propoganda dekhte dekhte tum mental slave ban gaye ho.
@harinjoshi95663 ай бұрын
Karna Aur Ashwatthama jaise negative characters jimhone bahoot saare akshamya apradh kiye aur adharma ka saath diya, unhe glorify karna yahi is film ke director ki ghinouni maansikta ko darshati hai. No wonder some brainless kids who are brainwashed are doing mahima mandan of this film and its box office collections. In murkho ko humare itihaas se koi kena dena nahin hai. Bas kuch actors aur directors ke mansik ghulam ho chuke hai.
@sahilnayak83253 ай бұрын
Bhai sahab ye kalyug ant dwapar yug jesa nhi hoga is yug me scientific yudh hoga