5 Piston twins still in production

5 Piston twins still in production
Follow us on social media:
/ vliegnetyoutube
/ vliegnet
Aircraft
Beechcraft G58 Baron
Diamond DA62
Piper Seneca V
Tecnam P2006T
Vulcanair P68
credits
Piper Aircraft, Inc.
• 2014 Piper Seneca
ControllerAircraft
• 2015 BEECHCRAFT G58 BA...
oneminutefilm.tv
• Video
• Video
Beechcraft
• Beechcraft Baron G58 S...
DiamondAircraftInd
• DA62 - More of the Best
Windsor Media
• FT Financial Times rev...
wmspotters
• Piper PA-34-220T Senec...
Tecnam Aircraft Official
• TECNAM CORPORATE 2017
Plane4You Centrum sprzedazy samolotów /Aircraft Sales Center
• Tecnam P2006T SP-MAC
AeroErmo Revista
• Vulcanair P.68
AOPA | Your Freedom to Fly
• We Fly the Diamond DA62
Music
Come Home by Declan DP / declandp
Creative Commons - Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported - CC BY-ND 3.0
creativecommons....
Music promoted by Audio Library • Come Home - Declan DP ...
Cold Sun by Del / del-sound
Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported - CC BY-SA 3.0
creativecommons....
Music promoted by Audio Library • Cold Sun - Del (No Cop...
All video content belongs to their respective owners.
Please subscribe, like and comment

[@KUROSHURA]

That diamond DA62 is absolutely gorgeous

[@MichaelWalker-wu2pq]

Great video. Given how far single engine prop planes have come in terms of speed, range, and comfort, along with fuel efficiency, it's no wonder why twin propellers are going extinct. Heck, the fastest twin prop made for charter, the Aerostar 702 is now outclassed by modern single prop planes (maybe outclassed is a poor choice of words). You can get an incredible range and speed and comfort in a TBM 930 and it's hard to justify maintenance costs for the nearest twin engine prop to it's equivalent. Just my 2 cents.

[@morteparla6926]

That comparison is seriously flawed. The Aerostar 702 is a twin PISTON engine, the TBM 930 is a single TURBOPROP engine. Two different worlds. Now compare a TURBOPROP twin to the TBM 930.

[@swagger897]

@@morteparla6926 You're missing the point though, and it's a great comparison. That TBM's cost /hr is going to be below that of the Aerostar. An Eclipse jet is nearly on par with an Aerostar's cost /hr too, with the only difference being entry cost. You can fit an E jet into a T-hangar... you can't do that with the Aerostar..

[@rustyalcorta3643]

The Baron G 58 is my favorite.

[@Vliegnet]

Also a favorite of mine, glad you enjoyed the video and thank you for watching.

[@Random-rt5ec]

The Beechcraft Baron G58 was the nicest looking of the 5.

[@benjaminseverin3436]

i ove how it starts with a brand new aircraft that is on the rise in popularity

[@morteparla6926]

I wish piston twins were still common, and I wish there was a truly affordable option out there for people who don't make 6 figures a year.

[@felicidadealegria]

a aviation is one of the 5 marvels of this world, thanks for posting this video!!

[@paperfly100]

G58 use 2 x IO-550C (300HP) instead 2 x IO-470L (used on 95-B55 only)

[@garybeaver7245]

Love that DA -62. The wings are impossibly narrow. I know less drag, but there's just not much wing for lift. Beautiful.

[@ryanchristopherson374]

The DA-62's wings are almost exactly 10 feet wider at the tips than the Baron. There's plenty of lift. Performance wise, the two are all but identical with one exception, the Baron carries 197 US Gallons while the DA-62 carries 87 US Gallons.

[@johnmay2786]

Gary, the DA42 wing area is only 2 square metres less than the Baron. DA42s regularly fly over where I live, they definitely look more like glider wings.

[@GaryMCurran]

Judy, a couple of comments. IF this was supposed to be a list of all the production, certified twin engin piston powered aircraft, you missed a couple. First, the DA-42 is still in production, the smaller sibling of the DA-62. The Piper Seminole is still in production, a four seat trainer aircraft. The G58 hasn't used IO-470's since the B55 series, the G58 uses IO-550s.

[@johnnyyuma9326]

Gary C. And cruises a lot faster than 180 knots.

[@reneconnan4322]

I was under the impression the G58 barons has IO-550 continental engines.

[@Albiom]

the last one uses 2 rotax 912s, it fits the 915s right? from 98hp to 141 hp each would be nice...

[@jrcolmena]

I found this video googling the same thing, also I was looking for some example with bladder tanks for longer ferry range but couldnt find any

[@dinbee4611]

Love these planes. Cheap to operate only not as fast also engine a bit noisy than turbines. But it does it's job well.

[@RADThird1]

First Barron I've seen with winglets. When did they add them?

[@noeramirez4975]

Short in data of each aircraft, pasengers?, fuel GPH, Stall Speed.

[@jhgeorg]

I would never buy a plane with only one door. In an emergency the can quickly turn into a death trap.

[@NoelJacobs]

DA42? Piper Seminole?

[@susantowey30]

Dear Santa, I have been a good person most of my life and if you would like to make me a happy camper you can do it by giving me ALL FIVE OF THESE AIRPLANES .

[@ossimjew]

why need all five when you could have one Aerostar? Best plane I have and will ever own, they are tremendously under valued compared to a 414

[@CAD-th1qe]

You will have to settle on a PC-12. Be good santa!

[@jeremymartinez4438]

Please do a video on long range single engine prop planes

[@3865ron]

I hope there wasn't any narration. I had to cut the sound due to the crap "music".

[@Flies2FLL]

The Beechcraft Baron 58 is the most maligned aircraft in history. By TRIAL ATTORNEYS~

[@SquareRigMaster]

Aerostar not far behind!

[@maddoc68]

Might be some reasons for that...

[@alabastardmasterson]

Flies2FLL I thought the V-tail was the one. Airframe weakness and whatnot

[@amariner5]

Engine, speed specs are off for the Baron.

[@robh3895]

nunber of passengers and priced would be nice, thanks for the metric

[@alfincassimiro4878]

Very Nice ! Beautiful !

[@Vliegnet]

Thank you ,glad you enjoyed the video and thank you for watching.

[@toyman9642]

Love the old Cessna 310.

[@okedave]

I know that the Vulcanan is a nice but you should show the vulcanan Observer is really lovely kite in it's own right

[@adildalli]

wouldn't be better to add price

[@garybarnes3978]

The Vulcanair looks like a old Aero commander.

[@JessHull]

was thinking the same thing... Would have been cool to see it do some maneuvering like the old Aero is capable of.

[@itamarrodriguesdearaujo]

BARON G58 IO-550 300HP

[@GrumpyAustralian]

A great pity Diamond Aircraft Industries was sold in December 2017.

[@collindass2361]

vulcanair looks good

[@astrofos1901]

diamond and beechcraft for me

[@themagicboy6548]

Remember back in the 1940s when aircraft had giant v12s making around 1200hp?

[@charlesmcguffy]

And the government was paying for the fuel

[@jacquesblaque7728]

Those big engines were not to be found in general aviation, nor in the Piper Cub.

[@antoniomartinez6722]

Diamond DA62 wow!

[@vovanevor6469]

Price?

[@jorgepalles8558]

Sin lugar a dudas el Diamond DA62 es mi preferido, por velocidad y economía, el único inconveniente sería que en algunos aeropuertos y aeródromos, habría que llevar el combustible en bidones desde una estación de carga, ya que en las estaciones aéreas no tienen combustible diésel.

[@alejandrosienra2179]

Stunning! ,,🛩️

[@32353235e]

Light twins are dying, but can't say that about larger ones, with GA potential

[@ft8292]

Yet another aviation video with no sound, no information. Is there a school out there which teaches this? Who would watch this?

[@irrelevant9023]

quite sad that piston aircrafts are dying

[@marvinblankinchip2535]

Alonso ... They're running out of gas.

[@andychen1099]

captain pancho fewer people can afford it

[@paladin0654]

Looks like this has been lifted from manufacturing web sites.

[@av8rbri473]

STOP THE MUSIC

[@jancovanderwesthuizen8070]

Not a huge fan of the DA62's looks but she really is much more beautiful in flight

[@ecerejo]

Probably the most economical out of them all when it comes GPH.

[@hshs5756]

I watched a DA62 headed out of the Grants Pass, OR airport's pattern (which I live under) yesterday and had to go looking for what it was. Diesel engines? That explains why it sounded so weird. But she looked very lean and lovely, like a dancer's body.

[@melvinmartinez3689]

I hate when music ruined videos

[@kindder90er3]

Beautiful 2-Engine-Plane. Beautiful Music Choice. > the first One

[@Funnyguy5593]

DA-62 is actually diesel

[@BobABooey.]

They can run on both Jet-A or diesel.

[@RADThird1]

It's not a turbo prop though it is Turbocharged.

[@lakota5688]

You confused Gas-oil (diesel fuel) or Jet-A wich are fuels and Diesel wich is a type of engine. (AE 330 for DA62 ...) And AE 330 is a PISTON Diesel turbocharged engine, not turboprop ...

[@missinglincoln]

My takeaway from this video. Two comments and a question. C 1) Diamond make some funky looking aeroplanes; C 2) Even nearly 50 years since it was introduced, the Piper Senaca is still a seriously good looking machine; Q 1) The Diamond has diesel engines? How common are diesel engines in aviation? Ok, those were two questions. Sorry.

[@msproule]

DA62 and DA42 are the only piston twins using "diesel" or better know in av lingo as Jet-A1, et al. The early versions were a bit clunky. With the addition of a FADEC on the Diamond's the fuel flow on these engines is down right miserly.

[@phils4634]

Michael - aerodiesels (such as the 180hp AE330) are really going to make a big difference to smaller short-haul, mixed passenger / freight operators. Jet / Turboprop's great for medium to long range, but for those very short-haul journeys (1 hour or less, small passenger / freight loads) jet is a poor choice. The power output of the new aerodiesels is increasing - 200hp will be coming soon enough - and with their miserly use of an already cheaper fuel (Jet-A's cheaper per litre than AvGas), AND remarkable service intervals - this really IS the future of short haul mixed passenger / freight operations. It would be interesting to see the resurgence of the likes of the Britten-Norman Trislander (with diesels), and maybe the development of a whole new range of diesel - powered, light mixed use airframes.

[@glibsonoran]

The Diamond diesels are modified Mercedes 2.0L Automotive diesels. So they run with a modified ECU: instant starts, automated run up and engine check, no need for dual magnetos and ignition systems, no worrying about shock cooling on descent (they're liquid cooled), much better fuel ecomomy, they're turbo charged so full power up to about 13,000 ft, and outside the US where aviation gas is rare the fact that they run on JetA is very useful. The biggest drawback is they're quite a bit heavier than equivalent power gasoline engines.

[@luigi_spotteraviation9278]

Tecnam p2006t mk2

[@nesvarog14]

Thanks

[@vitaliycat7906]

g58?

[@FOBob-sr1fd]

Miss the old Cessna 414

[@origionalwinja]

would have been awesome if they used real measurments

[@piloto5248]

WOW give all to me......thanks foe sharing

[@airplanereportertecnam9851]

I have got Tecnam p2006t

[@tnnaroot]

Tecnam p2012

[@ijaznadeem7269]

Why that annoying music? Totally insane.

[@vimp5594]

Дальность маловата.... :((

[@ernestopaulmedinaparedes3139]

Excellent sound track of vulcanair and beechcraft's escens.

[@Lubinius]

Great

[@alphonsepipo1948]

Piper Seminole ?

[@Siquemar1]

Very good 😊

[@MybackHurtz1]

Crazy that my stock ford mustang has more HP than these planes.

[@bill0118]

Very useful indeed to have so much HP in a car...

[@thomasmcsweeney9871]

Your MUSTANG doesn't have to worry about the weight of its engine; while for the aircraft it is often the heaviest component and for aircraft it's all about the weight - use the lightest engine that will get the job done. That said, yes these are small fast engines and like your Mustang, should be flying for many years with correct maintenance.

[@edsonsouza1173]

Muinto bonito

[@yanghun-25jin-lamborghinib77]

I's like to have it all!

[@ดําอัลกออิดะห์]

100,000 US

[@1pjlewis2]

I could not afford one of this beautiful machines if you gave me one. I die for a 182 Cessna though. Nope I still could not afford one of those either. Maybe a 172 ? Well that would be marginal! Well I would settle for a 150. Any one want to give me one. ha ha Ha.

[@hshs5756]

This must only be counting "real" aircraft, as in those with long-distance and/or commercial potential. The little Rotax piston engines ubiquitous in ultralight and light sport aircraft have revolutionized hobby flying and, while still not cheap, put a lot of people in the air who otherwise would have been priced out.

[@Vanilla0729]

Light sport Twins?

[@jungdaepark8711]

죽이는 비행기들입니다. That's wonderful.

[@Handymanherb]

BAD MUSIC VIDEO NO INFO

[@mikeorclem]

your 2's are screwy on the first one

[@Vliegnet]

Thank you for watching.

[@hibixby5777]

be more beautiful than a woman.

[@nadjiblazizi6695]

Diamond 62 is turboprop in case if you don't know

[@gcrauwels941]

Actually , it's a turbocharged 4 cylinder diesel burning jet fuel . 180hp a wing .

[@aimtrue4540]

It is powered by 2 turbocharged Austro AE300 diesel piston engines that burn Jet-A fuel. There is talk of switching the engines for turboprops but there are none yet that I know of...they had one at AirVenture...beautiful plane...

[@pedrikle]

Nadjib Lazizi you are wrong, it isn’t a turboprop... it has (2 Powerplants Austro AE330 diesel aircraft engines, 134 kW (180 hp) each) en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diamond_DA62#Specifications_(DA62)

[@semaex]

I'm sorry friend, but you're wrong. It's a piston aircraft, it doesn't have a turbine whatsoever.

[@IndieNesia]

Diesel engine!

[@jhonatangonzagarodriguesam7097]

Lindo esses avioes

[@DraGon-cg6ge]

baron!!!

[@chocholo135]

how much

[@rainerzufall689]

Five.

[@orlandoperez.9438]

Very very god.

[@propellerhead9197]

tecnam p2012 traveller

[@richardbenjamin3289]

why didn’t cessna make this list?

[@kevinkramer1503]

Cessna doesn't make any piston twins anymore. They make jets that are twins.

[@РусланАмиралиев-т9ч]

Подарите мне самолёт, я каждую неделю домой летал.

[@Richard-gw7ix]

200th like, great video

[@MMM19561]

Красавец

[@unclejack123]

unclear - only five being built? or five of those being built?

[@vitaliycat7906]

кайф сколько стоит честно

[@torezanitorezani3209]

mamamia

[@majidmajid1848]

👍🤗💎💎💎💎💎💎💎

[@samaipata4756]

The Diamond twin is the most useless aircraft ever built! You need to be acrobatic to get in and out and other then a toothbrush and credit card it has room for nothing!

[@jacquesblaque7728]

Maybe work on diet & exercise? The diesel engines sip Jet-A, much less expensive than 100LL, and more generally available

[@生駒正義-h1q]

分からない

[@beardedbarnstormer9577]

But why? Piston twins are stupid

[@nocalsteve]

You can't log multi-engine time in a single.

[@theodoretikhomirov6015]

No. No. And no.

[@glenngammon4215]

This is completely unusable info as nowhere is the speed given in 'miles per hour' (which anyone can understand). If you want to go sell info in Europe then do it - I live in the USA!

[@grantpyle1557]

In the USA airspeed is figured in knots (nautical miles per hour) and is the figure used when filing an FAA flight plan. Multiply knots by 1.15 to get MPH. The 175 knot cruise airspeed shown equates to 201.25 MPH.

[@maddogmorgan1]

Info was given in both knots for speed and range in nautical miles. No one cares about MPH unless your airspeed indicator is in MPH which stopped in the 50's. Converting knots to MPH is primary school maths

[@CocoEspada]

Glenn Gammon Shut up Meg.

[@bermudarailway]

I once took off in a TB10 not realising that the ASI was calibrated in KMPH ! I couldn't understand why the stall warner went off indicating 80 .I then noticed that the inner scale was calibrated in KTS and I was only doing 50.I lowered the nose and then used the inner scale for the rest of the flight. KTS to MPH only a 15% difference .KTS to KMPH 84% difference !

[@piotrkozlowski8543]

Glenn Gammon He has given it in nautical miles on every one of them. Thats sufficient for anyone that has come close to an aircraft.

[@luigi_spotteraviation9278]

Tecnam p2012

[@Vliegnet]

Thank you for watching.