7 years after this video was published and I am using this to refute my history professor. Thank you so much for your hard work.
@EthanM498 Жыл бұрын
How did it go?
@OrthodoxInquiry Жыл бұрын
@ethan murdoch I want to know as well.
@giorhem900 Жыл бұрын
Yah how did it go bro ?
@Sehon13Ultd Жыл бұрын
How did it go?
@RealJDTactical Жыл бұрын
Fr
@mathscience68296 жыл бұрын
If we had this much evidence for anything else in ancient history it would be called fact and be in every history book. But because it’s the bible they put it through the hardest and most hypothetical situation and scenarios. But every time it prevails. May God bless those who are blinded by their own mind
@FilipCordas5 жыл бұрын
Not really this is just trying to make few things they got right seam like there are no things they got wrong. Also they are trying to make it seem that Acts count as evidence for Jesus and that is just wrong.
@red_robin11225 жыл бұрын
Filip Cordas he is just talking about it’s reliability the resurrection series is about evidence for Jesus
@FilipCordas5 жыл бұрын
@@red_robin1122 Well yes that is my point. You can establish reliability of the four gospels by saying acts are accurate. They where written at different times by different people.
@red_robin11225 жыл бұрын
Filip Cordas luke wrote act but we cool
@FilipCordas5 жыл бұрын
@MegaE5150 Please don't use Carrier as an authority it's just makes you look silly. He is a popular author and has no work published, his methods are bad, doesn't know what he is taking about, and his PHD is in history of science not in fields he likes to think he is an expert in.
@kadenreijgers13513 жыл бұрын
I don’t normally comment on videos but this one has compelled me too. Thank you for putting this together. I’ve really been struggling with the historical aspects of Christianity and whether or not the Bible is reliable. This video has both inspired me and driven me to keep on studying the data and to keep on seeking the truth. Thank you.
@parkerj17762 жыл бұрын
Keep seeking the truth brother, I pray it leads you to Christ!
@marcfofi6883 жыл бұрын
I was not expecting this much external evidence! It doesn’t matter if Christianity will always “feel right” to me anymore, it’s basically truth for me at this point.
@puseletsomampuru3728 жыл бұрын
Denying Christ Is not based on intellectual reasons.
@jeromeelster8038 жыл бұрын
Puseletso Mampuru Sure is...lying about supposed evidence to support jesus existance is wrong, and accepting jesus based simply on what's written in the bible, which is not proof, is self deception...and to pretend like your own self- deception concerning jesus is fact and presenting to others as if it were fact is lying!!
@puseletsomampuru3728 жыл бұрын
Jerome Elster If it was before I would take what you're saying in consideration.But now I know Christ's deity to be true because there is also some external evidence.I have been changed from my wicked ways by the Gospel.I have seen hardcore serial killers ,rapists and even apologetics of other faiths completely transformed. What is it that turns turns a suicide bomber to practice the faith of the very people he hates and was sent to bomb up.I try and try everyday to understand things from an atheist perspective but the evidence for God is overwhelming.Nothing makes sense if He doesn't exist.
@samnikole16437 жыл бұрын
+Jerome Elster Thousands of Muslims See Christ and testify and die for their testimony. Why are you calling them liars? Who are you a liar to call others such?
@IndieBirdieMusic5 жыл бұрын
Jerome Elster THANK you!!
@dn2k7185 жыл бұрын
I love the fact that you research not only pros that support Jesus' existence but you also research many cons that defy Jesus' existence and then you counter it efficiently.
@anonymousguy25683 жыл бұрын
Don't forget that Matthew was a tax collector and so him getting the tax amount and exchange rate correct makes it even more likely he was the actual author
@johnf817 Жыл бұрын
You must have not watched the video
@markbirchall26968 жыл бұрын
This KZbinr does the best work I have seen on Christian apologetics! And I have seen nearly all of it. Keep it coming.
@jeromeelster8038 жыл бұрын
Mark Birchall These aren't simply apologetics...they are LIES!!!
@OlviMasta777 жыл бұрын
Jerome Elster Starting with...?
@mrmillartv62777 жыл бұрын
Jerome Elster the truth will set you free. accept jesus christ as your lord and saviour
@varundavid76207 жыл бұрын
Jerome Elster show your proof.
@bektastic23866 жыл бұрын
Varun David the burden of proof falls on the person making the positive claim that would be you. if you want to assert leprechauns or Jesus exist it's you that needs to produce the evidence. there is nothing, but allegorical myths that even mention Bible Jesus, from the first century. we don't have a clue who wrote the Gospels. (Christians like pretend to know that the know but have no supporting evidence). Josephus is passage that he mentioned from 1st century was a forgery probably by eusebius several hundred years later. and this can be conclusively demonstrated if you don't just buy into the lies this man is feeding you. apologetics is only a different word for propaganda
@Darkstars239 жыл бұрын
I prophecy that the holy spirit use you more deeper and deeper to defend the bible. Thanks for these information God bless the work of your hands :)
@thenopasslook9 жыл бұрын
InspiringPhilosophy is the GOAT!!
@GregOld315 жыл бұрын
Bryson Townsend no they just talk about the GOAT: Jesus.
@ea-tr1jh3 жыл бұрын
@@kevinmathew6520 its... not.... meant to be?
@SparkyBites9 жыл бұрын
Great work, now you just need a series on the Old Testament. ;D
@UnratedAwesomeness6 жыл бұрын
Sparky if the NT is correct, Jesus is God. If God confirms the OT, I trust Him. Haha
@sageseraph50356 жыл бұрын
UnratedAwesomeness Still would be awesome!
@juancarlosaliba48664 жыл бұрын
If the Bible is true: In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God..... And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us
@bijoythewimp28544 жыл бұрын
That would be a long series
@gaipa20064 жыл бұрын
He should match the Septuagint and the dead sea scrolls Bible.
@AltonJ099 жыл бұрын
"Nailed it!" I love this!
@hereLiesThisTroper9 жыл бұрын
+Alton Johnson oh no you did not! you sir just 'crossed' a line!
@AltonJ099 жыл бұрын
hereLiesThisTroper, I didn't mean it like that, sorry.
@hereLiesThisTroper9 жыл бұрын
Alton Johnson peace brother, I was joking and I know you're joking. See 'crossed' is a pun
@Troy62289 жыл бұрын
Very well done, IP. You're motion graphics are getting increasingly better.
@JosueWithContext9 жыл бұрын
I specially loved the map animations, they are so intriguing.
@tiggero66906 жыл бұрын
They look very pretty - but they're wrong. The two 'Jewish' states were Judea and Samaria - both quite a bit smaller than pictured.
@harvardofmemes82634 жыл бұрын
@@tiggero6690 could you do the animations?
@johndy95713 жыл бұрын
YOU FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THOSE HISTORICAL FIGURES YOU MENTIONED WERE BORN AFTER JESUS ALLEGEDLY DEATH! Tacitus just said early Christians were being persecuted and Christus was the founder. He didnt meet jesus. Josephus was born after Jesus death he only have second hand information. How can he verify that Jesus really existed? The date 500 C.E. for the conclusion of the Amoraic era is the traditional date of the completion of the Babylonian Talmud. (Are you sure Talmud is a reliable source? It was completed 500 years after Jesus allegedly death? BESIDE Nazareth didn't exist during the time of Jesus, it was confirmed by the carbon dating. Knowing the places in the bible is not a good proof that everything in the bible is true. For example the founder of mormon he said he sa the angel, and he can pinpoint in the map the location of new york, and other places in USA, Would you believe him? A big chance you won't. Christianity and other relgion borrowed elements of other religion, and tradition and culture. Christianity spread because of aggressive conversation and conquering. I wonder if other minor religion can pinpoint in the map the location of their messiah's ? would you believe they are the true relgion if they can pinpoint the location of their history?
@forschoolpurposes90323 жыл бұрын
@@johndy9571 what ever the 1st century historians said was prolly compared to the Bible and confirms Jesus' existence.
@forschoolpurposes90323 жыл бұрын
@@johndy9571 Jesus never showed agressions nor was a warlord yet he was still followed by many. The christian crusades happened and spreaded christianity in the 10th century, yeah. But jesus was in the 1st century yet still followed by many people. Bro ur analogy of the mormon thing just doesn't work
@Ammall-rt9xd8 ай бұрын
This video has strengthened my faith to certainty. How can there be this much evidence from NON-Christian sources.
@KriegZombie3 жыл бұрын
I've been blessed with having had the opportunity to travel to the Holy Land and see some of the things you mention in person.
@5BBassist4Christ Жыл бұрын
This video series completely flew under my radar. I just now discovered it and am loving it.
@ὁκατέχων9 жыл бұрын
Once again, good job IP!
@Romano20189 жыл бұрын
if the new testeament is so reliable why some skeptics still doubt of the miraculous events? why would the followers worry so much about detailing places, names and cultural practices just for a lie?
@JulioCaesarTM5 жыл бұрын
Can't take the Skeptics again seriously at this point.
@ceasedesist96763 жыл бұрын
Simple, everyone would rather believe what they want to believe. The simplest evidence is flat earthers, do not think that no human on earth is immune from the deceptions of pride.
@spencergage959 жыл бұрын
Wow, that sure was a lot of accurate stuff! You should consider making a series disputing or refuting every thing that Wikipedia editors keep claiming the Bible has "wrong". It's usually minor, and I know Wikipedia is not exactly a valued source, but it is commonly used enough that I think it would be great to just sort of debunk it all.
@bektastic23865 жыл бұрын
funny how much of it's been debunked!
@loisirsentertainment59194 жыл бұрын
@@bektastic2386 lol show us where it's been debunked 😂
@bektastic23864 жыл бұрын
@@loisirsentertainment5919 it's not my job to educate you. Feel free to honest with yourself. Try to prove your beliefs wrong. You'll be amazed what you'll learn. :) Try science and psychology, then move into history. Read the Christian delusion. The information is at your finger tips, use it.
@loisirsentertainment59194 жыл бұрын
@@bektastic2386 Thanks😊. I've already checked most of what you're talking about. I've been checking all this for 5 good months, watching debates over debates, conferences and seminaries, learning history and reading articles and books, it really didn't debunk my belief... I've taken time to analyze what both sides say and what their reasons are... honestly, they're just a bunch of arguments that sometimes actually make sense, but too weak to say they debunked anything. Anybody who is really honest and who takes time to analyze things very deeply will know there are stronger arguments by the side of christianity. I suggest you do the same you've suggested me to do, with an unbiased perspective. And apart from that, you can always ask Jesus to reveal himself to you if he's real... Peace
@bektastic23864 жыл бұрын
@@loisirsentertainment5919 Ok well I used to be a Christian. Wanted to stay a Christian. After several YEARS i began to realize it was false. There are WAY more then two sides to these debates. You say you have seen most of what I"m talking about!? Really?You have no idea what you don't know. Obviously, or you wouldn't still be a believer, in any religions.
@michaelx50703 жыл бұрын
Once you see evidence like this, supposed literary parallels to mythical accounts just doesn’t cut it anymore.
@haselstrauch1688 Жыл бұрын
They did never cut honestly, no expert in mythology would take them for serious.
@stevebob19679 жыл бұрын
Really liked your series on New Testament reliability. Very well thought out on your delivery. I have used an excerpt from one of your videos before trying to prove a point and it looks like I might have to use this one as well. (I give you full credit and a link to your site of course) Very nice work.
@johndy95713 жыл бұрын
YOU FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THOSE HISTORICAL FIGURES YOU MENTIONED WERE BORN AFTER JESUS ALLEGEDLY DEATH! Tacitus just said early Christians were being persecuted and Christus was the founder. He didnt meet jesus. Josephus was born after Jesus death he only have second hand information. How can he verify that Jesus really existed? The date 500 C.E. for the conclusion of the Amoraic era is the traditional date of the completion of the Babylonian Talmud. (Are you sure Talmud is a reliable source? It was completed 500 years after Jesus allegedly death? BESIDE Nazareth didn't exist during the time of Jesus, it was confirmed by the carbon dating. Knowing the places in the bible is not a good proof that everything in the bible is true. For example the founder of mormon he said he sa the angel, and he can pinpoint in the map the location of new york, and other places in USA, Would you believe him? A big chance you won't. Christianity and other relgion borrowed elements of other religion, and tradition and culture. Christianity spread because of aggressive conversation and conquering. I wonder if other minor religion can pinpoint in the map the location of their messiah's ? would you believe they are the true relgion if they can pinpoint the location of their history?
@spitfire63789 жыл бұрын
In my opinion one of your best videos yet.
@ChrisMbinyui-k2r9 ай бұрын
This is so inspiring,so well-researched; it's a great load of facts and evidence packed in so short a video! Thank you.
@rocio88516 жыл бұрын
The way you do informative videos is class. May God reward your effort!
@CptDawner6 ай бұрын
I showed a friend this video and his pride still manages to make him believe that he deserves direct proof of the things in the Bible, it’s not enough for some people to be shown that it’s a reliable account and that these were real people who saw real things, incredible but real. Take some advice friends, you cannot save those who do not want to be saved. There is no end to their suffering until they let go of their pride and wish to step into the kingdom of god. We can only pray for some.
@Hwacast9 жыл бұрын
18 minutes? Wow! And also 2 dislikes within 20 minutes of the videos release already? Shows atheist can't refute actually arguments and so they have to resort to disliking your videos. At least that's better than listening to their ad hominems.
@Nonalhomophobie6 жыл бұрын
And assuming it was atheists who disliked the video, that's not ad hominem ?
@xxxmmm38125 жыл бұрын
@@Nonalhomophobie who would dislike a video they did not see unless they were someone of an opposing view who cannot stand any kind of videos proving them wrong? besides you need to check on what an ad hominem actually is.
@Nonalhomophobie5 жыл бұрын
@@xxxmmm3812 I do know what an ad hominem is, and it applies here.
@Nonalhomophobie4 жыл бұрын
@krispy kreme An ad hominem is precisely the lack of an argument. And it applies here.
@0004voltz4 жыл бұрын
Matt Dillahunty would say "these are just claims not evidence".
@GarfieldRex3 жыл бұрын
Just discovered your channel and I'm already loving it. Greetings from Colombia 🇨🇴👌
@alangervasis2 жыл бұрын
This Video should have millions of views.
@doctor12thdoctor9 жыл бұрын
IP you are the juggernaut for Theism. p.s you are the best
@Dj84JA29 жыл бұрын
+The agnostic theist He's not there yet, but he will be. Keep it up IP.
@bektastic23865 жыл бұрын
he's great for believers to deepen their confirmation bias. If he was really good, he'd be convincing non believers too
@red_robin11225 жыл бұрын
Bek Carr he convinced me for a while I felt like I could whoop any argument a christian threw but this channel was absolutely instrumental in my conversion I simply couldn’t answer to his resurrection series
@gaiusoctavius59354 жыл бұрын
@Bek Carr, As a somewhat secular Jewish person he's convincing me to rethink my position on what Christians say about Jesus.
@jesussotelo47754 жыл бұрын
@@gaiusoctavius5935 my friend, following Jesus is the most Jewish thing you could ever do.
@johnthebaptist53746 жыл бұрын
2:36 where he says, “if one call him a man” was added in later, I️ still think the rest is reliable though. I️ am Sub Zero
@gleasonparker16845 жыл бұрын
This IS faith building. Great information.
@lalumierehuguenote9 жыл бұрын
Thumbs up for the animation at the end on Judea and its different government. Really awesome. Thank you and now shut up and take my money ! :P
@19tzortz9 жыл бұрын
***** Agreed. The production value of IP's vids are definitely getting better all the time (and they were never bad to begin with).
@lalumierehuguenote9 жыл бұрын
Mark Williams It sure was !
@lalumierehuguenote9 жыл бұрын
19tzortz To be honest I know how to do some of them, like the way the texts appear then slow down when they approach the place they are supposed to be. But the animation with the land of Judea. I have no idea ! It was very cool ^^
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
***** Thanks, a friand Matt was able to help with that. I can't take full credit at least.
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Mark Williams Possibly :)
@ericlestick73259 жыл бұрын
My nephew is a pure materialist, and takes no time in expressing exactly what he thinks about my faith. In April of this year my mom died, and rage is very near the surface. So is doubt for the first time in my life. Like a volcano, I want to bury and cremate my nephew both at once, but I am reminded that it is not my father's will that any should perish; furthermore it is not right to mock the blind for being blind. Thank you for reminding me of these facts. May you live forever! Sincerely, Someone you don't even know.
@tylerx0996 жыл бұрын
Eric Lestick sorry to hear man, I know this comment is 2 years old but I hope everything with you and your family is going ok
@fredsalfa6 ай бұрын
Thanks for that. I didn’t realise there was an overwhelming amount of evidence supporting the Gospels.
@Nahidwin-v9g9 жыл бұрын
can you do a video in which explains the book of ecclesiaste because i think that many people underestimate the knowledge in that book
@UnityFromDiversity6 жыл бұрын
I love the earthquake evidence at 9:11. Peter J Williams also thinks 4-3-33 is the date of the crucifixion. Great content.
@PaulDavid709 жыл бұрын
Nice summarization of the facts and information put together in an entertaining fashion. Well done!
@jordan79856 жыл бұрын
I think one other thing this video forgets to mention, is that these evidences would also be evidence to use for the early dating of the gospels, since they would have gotten so much right about the time and places ;) just thought I’d help out 😬
@davidford155 жыл бұрын
"evidence to use for the early dating of the gospels" The Greek translators of the original Aramaic of the NT made a more 'politically-correct' rendition of NT references to non-Jews, and replaced a particular place's antiquated name with its more-current name: Norton, William. 1889. _A Translation, in English Daily Used, of the Peshito-Syriac Text, and of the Received Greek Text, of Hebrews, James, 1 Peter, and 1 John, With an Introduction on the Peshito-Syriac Text, and the Revised Greek Text of 1881_ (London: W. K. Bloom), ~140pp. What's below is from a Google books copy; the book is also at archive.org/details/translationineng00nort In the Introduction, pages l - li: In the names of places, the Peshito shows the same independence of the Greek. . . . . in Acts xxi. 7, the Gk. has, Ptolemais; the Syriac has, Acu. Mr. Jer. Jones, in his work on the Canon, 1798, contends that the use of the name Acu, for Ptolemais, is a decisive proof that the Peshito must have been made not far in time from A.D. 70, when Jerusalem was destroyed. (vol. i. p. 103. ) He says that the most ancient name of this place among the Israelites was Aco, or Acco, Judges i. 31; that this name was afterwards changed to Ptolemais; that some say it had its new name from Ptolemy Philadelphus, about 250 B. C. He says it is certain that the old name Aco, was antiquated and out of use in the time of the Romans, and that the use of the old name Acu, in the Peshito, can be accounted for in no other way, but by supposing that the persons for whom the version was made were more acquainted with it, than with the new name Ptolemais; that upon any other supposition it would have been absurd for him to have used Acu. He says, that until the destruction of Jerusalem, one may suppose that the Jews may have retained the old name Aco still, out of fondness for its antiquity; but, he says, "how they, or any other part of Syria, could, after the Roman conquest, call it by a name different from the Romans, seems to me impossible to conceive. . . To suppose, therefore, that this translation, in which we meet with this old name, instead of the new one, was made at any great distance of time after the destruction of Jerusalem, is to suppose the translator to have substituted an antiquated name known to but few, for a name well known to all" (pp. 104, 105. ) Mr. Jones says that a similar proof that the Peshito cannot have been made much after A.D. 70, is found in the fact that the Peshito often calls the Gentiles, as the Jews were accustomed to do, _profane persons_, where the Greek calls them _the nations_, that is, the Gentiles. The Peshito calls them profane, in Matt. vi. 7; x. 5; xviii.17; Mark vii. 26; John vii. 35; Acts xviii.4, 17; 1 Cor. v. 1; x. 20, 27; xii. 2; 1 Pet. iv.3. The expression is used, therefore, throughout the Peshito. Mr. Jones says, that it shows that the writer was a Jew, for no other person would have called all the world profane; and that after the destruction of the temple, all Hebrew Christians must have seen that other nations were not to be reckoned unclean and profane in the Jewish sense, and that therefore this version must have been made either before, or soon after, A.D. 70. (On Canon, Vol. i., pp. 106-110.)
@orthodoxoschristianos4355 жыл бұрын
Amazing job! My prayers for you, brother.
@manutdfan43219 жыл бұрын
Well researched as usual
@bektastic23866 жыл бұрын
Mido NOT!
@ericarcher14039 жыл бұрын
Excellent video! Well researched and presented. Thank you so much for your work.
@JohnQPublic119 жыл бұрын
Excellent work!
@DarylSoar9 жыл бұрын
Really interesting. It's nice to know how the supporting evidence is presented, and to get a better picture of what the supporting evidence is. This video seems a little flawed due to bias. Using the same logic, one could conclude The Da Vinci code is a factual account, or that Spiderman really exists.
@JohnQPublic119 жыл бұрын
+Daryl Soar - You only have two options Daryl. Either produce a science experiment that exactly duplicates the universe as we see it or admit defeat. There is no third option. You and your nonexistent evidences, nutty theories absent empirical proofs, spreading the lie of man arising from inert dirt, from a 10 to the 47th power chance of a Goldilocks abiogenesis Fairy Tale. You're laughable Daryl. Now either produce the experiment or run along.
@DarylSoar9 жыл бұрын
If a 15 billion year experiment is what it would take to convince you then that's a burden of proof I cannot meet. Tell me, has calling someone laughable ever won someone over to your position before? I'm convinced by science. It has evidence and tells a plausible story that weaves together all the pieces. Every time errors are discovered, science is corrected. Every day, science takes a step closer to accurately representing reality. Can you provide anything beyond personal testimony and philosophical proofs? You've told me to go and read a website, but even that fails to meet the standards of science. It really shouldn't be hard to find a few god bullets to blast some holes in science. Take a shot.
@JohnQPublic119 жыл бұрын
+Daryl Soar - Thanks for finally admitting science cannot meet its own burden of proof. Theists are convinced by science. So what is your point. Theists know science corrects itself. Theists also know that there has NOT been one single thing science has NOT had to correct itself on. Science is flawed Daryl. But more importantly science is restricted to, and limited by, the miniscule portion of space it lives in. Sciences picture of reality will never grow beyond that point because the factual reality of science imprisons the knowledge of science to its 7 billion mile prison cell. You "Every time errors are discovered, science is corrected. Every day, science takes a step closer to accurately representing reality." Me Right! That is exactly what theists believe. Your problem is you believe scientism is science. When it isn't. You "Can you provide anything beyond personal testimony and philosophical proofs?" Me Personal testimony and philosophical theories is all *YOU* have Daryl. Just as you admitted. That is what I have been saying all along and *THAT* is the *PROOF* I am right! Peace!
@DarylSoar9 жыл бұрын
What you're describing is a Mexican standoff. To convince me, all you need do is bring out your god. And all you have is a pair of closed eyes and an 1800 year old book to convince me. While i have all the world's military and technology. I don't fancy your chances much.
@angelsantana7806 Жыл бұрын
Hey, God bless you man I just wanted to ask you where did you get all of this information from him? I myself am a Christian and I would love to be able to learn all of this information and study and myself if possible if you could post some links or something like that undergo the video I would really appreciate it. Thank you and God bless.
@Samu-xc2tc Жыл бұрын
Hi! On the video (and in description) u can find all the sources that he use; you can investigate this sources (books, investigations, etc)
@progodspeed23116 жыл бұрын
IP IP! Can you recommend me any good books to further my understanding of the historicity of Christianity (for and against it). Thanks 🙏🏼
@InspiringPhilosophy6 жыл бұрын
www.inspiringphilosophy.org/recommended-reading/
@ericgatera71495 жыл бұрын
"Jesus and the Last Supper" by Brant Pitre and "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses" by Richard Bauckham
@johndy95713 жыл бұрын
HE FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THOSE HISTORICAL FIGURES YOU MENTIONED WERE BORN AFTER JESUS ALLEGEDLY DEATH! Tacitus just said early Christians were being persecuted and Christus was the founder. He didnt meet jesus. Josephus was born after Jesus death he only have second hand information. How can he verify that Jesus really existed? The date 500 C.E. for the conclusion of the Amoraic era is the traditional date of the completion of the Babylonian Talmud. (Are you sure Talmud is a reliable source? It was completed 500 years after Jesus allegedly death? BESIDE Nazareth didn't exist during the time of Jesus, it was confirmed by the carbon dating. Knowing the places in the bible is not a good proof that everything in the bible is true. For example the founder of mormon he said he sa the angel, and he can pinpoint in the map the location of new york, and other places in USA, Would you believe him? A big chance you won't. Christianity and other relgion borrowed elements of other religion, and tradition and culture. Christianity spread because of aggressive conversation and conquering. I wonder if other minor religion can pinpoint in the map the location of their messiah's ? would you believe they are the true relgion if they can pinpoint the location of their history?
@anunknownentity16373 жыл бұрын
@@johndy9571 lol a Jesus mythicist
@x.r.d77443 жыл бұрын
@@johndy9571 copy paste 🤡🤡🤡
@PhilHoffmanReviews9 жыл бұрын
Fantastic material! Awesome content, also, Modern Apologetics has been wanting to host a google hangout and we would love to have you join us, comment back what you think.
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Modern Apologetics Sure, let me know when.
@PhilHoffmanReviews9 жыл бұрын
+InspiringPhilosophy awesome, within the next month or so.
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Modern Apologetics Ok, Just let me know the time and date in advance.
@PhilHoffmanReviews9 жыл бұрын
+InspiringPhilosophy cool
@Πέγκυ-γ9σ8 жыл бұрын
+itsatz yeah, when YOU write a book of yours, dedicate a hundred or a thousand pages to your enemies or people you dislike. As IP explained clearly enough, those 3 historians were NOT Christians. They were in fact hostile to the Christian beliefs or just apathetic. BUT EVEN SO they DID mention Christ as a true historical figure, who not only performed miracles but also was believed from a gazillion people to be the Messiah. So even though it was an uncomfortable truth for them they couldn't miss document it as not only was this the most top historic events of their time, but also a massively acknowledged as a fact. Jesus was the enemy of both Judaism and Pagan religions around the Roman Empire,yet they could not pass His story on like it never happened, nor would they be willing to dedicate their life works on a Savior that demolished their authority and religious domination.
@starwarsawesome9 жыл бұрын
+InspiringPhilosophy, great video! I'm really happy that you know how to defend the historic, Christian way. I do that too, but often get bored with the same old arguments that skeptics raise. I would love to join a Google Hangout with you, not against you. We need more knowledgeable Christian thinkers like yourself!
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
+Josh Brister sure we can talk about that. Send me a message.
@iamspite45877 жыл бұрын
.....Where have you found all of this information. It is overwhelming, in good way.
@bienvenidosaunlugarllamado43369 жыл бұрын
***** I want to propose you one thing: I can translate all your videos into spanish so this new phase in apologetics arrive to the Spanish Speaking world. But of course I need your permission. I am excited with thw idea. If you accept I will renew all my channel.
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Bienvenidos a un Lugar Llamado Libertad Yeah, I would love for you to do that, as long as you can also give me the Spanish close captioning files for me to upload to my videos as well.
@Metalheadspartan9 жыл бұрын
Bienvenidos a un Lugar Llamado Libertad Perfecta idea!
@bienvenidosaunlugarllamado43369 жыл бұрын
***** Captioning files are the sentences that appear according to the audio,isn't it?
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Bienvenidos a un Lugar Llamado Libertad Correct, they usually come as srt files. www.makeuseof.com/tag/subtitles-text-editor-aegisub/ There is free software online for making them.
@bienvenidosaunlugarllamado43369 жыл бұрын
***** Ok, I will upload the video to communicate my subscribers to the renew of my channel by the first week of September.
@Gazdo019 жыл бұрын
Great work! Bravo!
@johndy95713 жыл бұрын
YOU FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THOSE HISTORICAL FIGURES YOU MENTIONED WERE BORN AFTER JESUS ALLEGEDLY DEATH! Tacitus just said early Christians were being persecuted and Christus was the founder. He didnt meet jesus. Josephus was born after Jesus death he only have second hand information. How can he verify that Jesus really existed? The date 500 C.E. for the conclusion of the Amoraic era is the traditional date of the completion of the Babylonian Talmud. (Are you sure Talmud is a reliable source? It was completed 500 years after Jesus allegedly death? BESIDE Nazareth didn't exist during the time of Jesus, it was confirmed by the carbon dating. Knowing the places in the bible is not a good proof that everything in the bible is true. For example the founder of mormon he said he sa the angel, and he can pinpoint in the map the location of new york, and other places in USA, Would you believe him? A big chance you won't. Christianity and other relgion borrowed elements of other religion, and tradition and culture. Christianity spread because of aggressive conversation and conquering. I wonder if other minor religion can pinpoint in the map the location of their messiah's ? would you believe they are the true relgion if they can pinpoint the location of their history?
@rev.j.rogerallen93288 жыл бұрын
EXCELLENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! A+ on your knowledge of History!
@adrianvarela88909 жыл бұрын
Narration is excelent. The facts! Without reliability there is no reason to trust the New Testament as eing the revelation of God and completion of the Bible. The only suggestion I make is that when the Lord Jesus is referenced, i would not use any picture of actors that portray Him. Not even artwork or anythig such. As I write I am concious that He is alive. He has risen! Read revelation 1 and you can get a picture of Him today. God bless you all!!!
@lucashondros34186 жыл бұрын
13:11 Also, philostratus got his info from Julia Domna via her diary. It contained a lot of romance and out right fictions. Also, Philostratus was paid to investigate Apollonius’ life which the New Testament authors weren’t. See “The Jesus Legend” by Boyd and Eddy for more!
@Bushido12744 жыл бұрын
From Bart D. Erhman to IP. I have accepted his evidences but that does not mean it's over for christianity. So I found this ^_^ Thank Lord, I was also praying for trust before I went to this.
@johndy95713 жыл бұрын
HE FORGOT TO MENTION THAT THOSE HISTORICAL FIGURES YOU MENTIONED WERE BORN AFTER JESUS ALLEGEDLY DEATH! Tacitus just said early Christians were being persecuted and Christus was the founder. He didnt meet jesus. Josephus was born after Jesus death he only have second hand information. How can he verify that Jesus really existed? The date 500 C.E. for the conclusion of the Amoraic era is the traditional date of the completion of the Babylonian Talmud. (Are you sure Talmud is a reliable source? It was completed 500 years after Jesus allegedly death? BESIDE Nazareth didn't exist during the time of Jesus, it was confirmed by the carbon dating. Knowing the places in the bible is not a good proof that everything in the bible is true. For example the founder of mormon he said he sa the angel, and he can pinpoint in the map the location of new york, and other places in USA, Would you believe him? A big chance you won't. Christianity and other relgion borrowed elements of other religion, and tradition and culture. Christianity spread because of aggressive conversation and conquering. I wonder if other minor religion can pinpoint in the map the location of their messiah's ? would you believe they are the true relgion if they can pinpoint the location of their history?
@holyromankingdomofthepoles7027 Жыл бұрын
@@johndy9571 to respond to one of your quotes, the Talmud, even though it was compiled in 500AD and written down at that time, is the result of a controlled oral tradition by professional students of the Mishnah, therefore yes, the testimony of the Talmud about Jesus is totally reliable.
@holyromankingdomofthepoles7027 Жыл бұрын
@@johndy9571 also yes, Nazareth exists, IP made a video on this.
@JM-sx1rp9 жыл бұрын
I think it's funny how Luke gets all these various titles and right. Or maybe it is just that the idea of a later forgery seems funny in the light of that? Anyway, that was great, thank you very much, IP. :)
@OrthodoxInquiry Жыл бұрын
Can anyone find a copy of all the volumes of Nathaniel Lardner’s “Credibility of the Gospel History”?
@jonathanbaca2322 жыл бұрын
AMAZING VIDEO, I love these facts.
@VerTV_022 жыл бұрын
The way, the truth and the life ❤ Jesus
@Tee685 Жыл бұрын
Praise God brother good work
@Flagrum39 жыл бұрын
Excellent videos!! Thanks for the upload, truly enjoyed the mass of information and the clearness. I second the reading of Nathaniel Lardner's; "Credibility of the Gospel History", although slightly difficult to read due to language convention, (I'm still on the first volume lol), still a mass of excellent evidence to the credibility of the Gospels. Look forward to future videos. : )
@rodolfoamador9408 жыл бұрын
May God Bless you
@GabrielV653 жыл бұрын
I don't know if it counts as external evidence but the Quran also mentions Jesus
@procyon63703 жыл бұрын
It's less useful as it was compiled 600 years after Jesus. If you're a Muslim, that's not a problem, but to scholars it is.
@samdon36934 жыл бұрын
Athiests be like "These are not evidence we want real evidence"
@juanitafourie37084 жыл бұрын
😄 Too true! Atheists want "real evidence" while at the same time believing the scientific impossibility that nothing created everything. 🤦🏼♀️
@samdon36934 жыл бұрын
@@juanitafourie3708 there is no such thing as real evidence for atheists 🤣
@williamjames40314 жыл бұрын
It's all about your skepticism level, you can increase your skepticism for almost anything.
@angeliquaserenity50095 жыл бұрын
Regardless if the Testamonium Flavium was added or doctored, Josephus nonetheless was a reliable witness of the person of Jesus. All the variants of Josephus' witness mention the historical Jesus minus or plus the Testamonium Flavium which expresses the resurrection of Jesus.
@JulioCaesarTM5 жыл бұрын
I think it's for Skeptics looking for a gotcha moment.
@angeliquaserenity50095 жыл бұрын
@@JulioCaesarTM Acknowledged
@xin09 жыл бұрын
i'm gobsmacked! applause for you!
@judy9139 Жыл бұрын
Another great video. I noticed you referred to 1st century Judea as “Palestine”. The region was not called Palaestina by the Romans until after the Jewish revolt and defeat in 135AD. This error seems to be very common, even amongst historians. It is important to correct given the current attempt to deny the deep connection between the Jews and the Holy Land. Thanks for your great work, though!
@michaelsommers23565 жыл бұрын
Your argument that:1) if the gospel authors were eyewitnesses they would get things right about the region and society; 2) the gospel authors got things right about the region and society; 3) therefore the gospel authors were eyewitnesses is an invalid form of argument. If it were valid, then the following would also be valid: 1) all dogs have four legs; 2) my cat has four legs; 3) therefore my cat is a dog. Symbolically, P implies Q, Q, therefore P, does not work. Let me also point out that if only eyewitnesses could have gotten things right, then only eyewitnesses could know that they got things right. Presumably, those today claiming that the gospels are so right are not claiming to have been eyewitnesses.
@InspiringPhilosophy5 жыл бұрын
I didn't make that argument, so your comment is a straw man. The argument I am making is probabilistic
@michaelsommers23565 жыл бұрын
@@InspiringPhilosophy It sure sounds as though that is the argument you are making. Is this your argument: 1) If the gospel authors were eyewitneses they would get things right about the region and society; 2) the gospel authors got things right about the region and society; 3) thefore, the gospel writers were probably eyewitnesses? If so, it still doesn't work. You would still need to prove the probability. Given that there were tens of thousands of potential writers (educated Greek speakers in the region), and at most a few hundred (and that is being generous) eyewitnesses, most or all of whom were illiterate Aramaic speakers, well, ... the numbers speak for themselves.
@InspiringPhilosophy5 жыл бұрын
That is appealing to quantity and ignoring quality. The evidence stacks up in favor of eyewitnesses and ignoring that is ignoring the actual evidence.
@michaelsommers23565 жыл бұрын
@@InspiringPhilosophy You said your argument was based on probability. Probabilities are numbers. You can't say that X is more probable than Y if you can't calculate numbers.
@InspiringPhilosophy5 жыл бұрын
Yes, because there is a lot of data to suggest eye witness accounts. Just because most people were illiterate that doesn't address the actual evidence associated with the gospels.
@SuperYGOD9 жыл бұрын
Many will question the account of the Gospels, but we must question their motives. If the Gospels are true, then we must decide who we believe Jesus was, is, and ever shall be. Jesus ask this question of Peter and we are no different. Jesus is either God or not God, but He cannot be both.
@LMN579 Жыл бұрын
God bless you. Amen.
@johnnybrave74436 жыл бұрын
Hooray! Good job. Now wish there is another video to make a case for the old testament.
@InspiringPhilosophy6 жыл бұрын
I'll do that eventually.
@solidmatic2 жыл бұрын
PRAISE THE LORD !!!!! that information so good
@d_fendr62227 жыл бұрын
Damn, where do you get this music? Specifically the tunes at 00:00 and 11:45?
@InspiringPhilosophy7 жыл бұрын
Name of the song is "FlyingHigh_Version A - Synth_Full_1"
@d_fendr62227 жыл бұрын
Alright, thanks!
@ThePultzFamily9 жыл бұрын
Fantastic video! Thanks!
@ramptonarsecandle2 жыл бұрын
Tacitus gives a brief mention of a "Chrstus" (generally read as "Christus" but in reality it could just as easily be read "Chrestus"), in a passage that shows evidence of tampering and contains no source.
@zyo25029 жыл бұрын
AWESOME
@jordan79856 жыл бұрын
I know this is a debateable topic but I think the shroud of Turin deserves a mention 👍🏼
@InspiringPhilosophy6 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure about that.
@jordan79856 жыл бұрын
InspiringPhilosophy I guess that settles my debate haha I find it interesting though. Great vid! used some of the stuff from this series to teach my high school life group l. Keep up the great work
@davidford155 жыл бұрын
@@InspiringPhilosophy What's your explanation for the origination of the Shroud of Turin's body image?
@andytheforgotten96319 жыл бұрын
GOD.BLESS.YOU IP!!!!!
@Dreammaster6955 жыл бұрын
Paul also said Jesus was buried, some septics say he was just left on the cross thats why the tomb was empty and all the sightings was hallucinations but I disagree
@jagathjayasena9 жыл бұрын
well done, hard work! Thank you!!
@youngidealist9 жыл бұрын
Book of the Title, from 10th century confirms that Josephus of 37 CE was not doctored much when it was doctored in the 3rd century? Do you have more detail to give or are you not seeing the problem with this claim?
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
+Steven R. Parker That is how textual criticism is done. You just not liking the date range is not an argument.
@youngidealist9 жыл бұрын
+InspiringPhilosophy Let me clarify the discrepancy I'm seeing. You said that the support for Josephus not being "too doctored" was a text written 1000 years later. How do you connect a 1000 year old document to a 2000 year old document as confirmation that the 2000 year old document wasn't doctored "too much" 1700 years ago? Couldn't it just as easily been the case that the 1000 year old document copied the doctored 1700 year old document?
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
+Steven R. Parker It could be, but the internal evidence in the Book of the Title suggests it is very early and predates scribal influence. Check out the source from Craig Evans I gave in the video who goes over this. There are a lot more historical tests used to evaluate something. If we just went on the date of the actual text, Pliny would only be around 1250 years old. In fact most of our ancient works would not be that old.
@youngidealist9 жыл бұрын
***** Can you describe how the strongest of these internal tests works?
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Steven R. Parker Strongest? The strongest is a collection of them. Robert Stein lists several: www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/gp/gp1_authenticity_stein.pdf? There are many strategies historians apply.
@barbarasunday35145 жыл бұрын
Thanks for this!
@annoyingdude769 жыл бұрын
Great video IP! I got one question though. Will you be doing a video on the inclusivism vs exclusivism vs pluralism dilema?
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
annoyingdude76 Probably eventually.
@christopherjohnson18739 жыл бұрын
First!
@lalumierehuguenote9 жыл бұрын
Christopher Johnson D:
@christopherjohnson18739 жыл бұрын
Go get 'em next time.
@nightmike7655 Жыл бұрын
He pretty much ignored the relevance of both intentional and unintentional changes in scriptures. Unintentional such as confusing the word "woman" for "virgin" in greek, among other changes. Intentional such as those from the antiadoptionists or the antidocetic sects, who changed deliveratelly the text to make Jesus fully human&God instead of only human and only God respectively. Also this sects opposed the idea that the God of the OT was different and inferior than the father of Jesus, which was very, very popular at the early christianity. For more insight I recommend "Misquoting Jesus" by Bart D. Erhman
@chrisfieramosca2 жыл бұрын
Great Series Brother
@chipan91914 жыл бұрын
I'm wondering where you got that 1.71 people figure for the ossuary of James. The New York times article that you linked in the description said there would be 20 people around this time who are named James with a father Joseph and a brother Jesus.
@Adrian-ri8my4 жыл бұрын
The article goes on to say “ other calculations yield an even lower probability” so perhaps he used one of those lower ones
@chipan91914 жыл бұрын
@@Adrian-ri8my maybe, I'd just like to know that source.
@juancarlosaliba48664 жыл бұрын
Yet IP, I think Josephus might have reasons to think the Nazarene was the Christ. Since He is a miracle worker, He did have an impact then to the Jewish people. He labelled Jesus as the Christ or the Messianic candidate because of the miracles just as Simon of Perea and other Messianic leaders who did claim that title.
@bryansphere63595 жыл бұрын
Good presentation IP! I’m wondering, have you read any of the works of Daniel B. Wallace or Darell Bock?
@InspiringPhilosophy5 жыл бұрын
Yes
@kierenmoore32367 жыл бұрын
Firstly, your videos are nicely produced, and you are obviously sincere in your desire to defend/perpetuate belief in Jesus. But the Josephus passage is not just thought to be a doctored version of an original passage of Josephus' - it is thought to be a wholesale insertion, not merely because of its gushing tone, unbefitting if a Jew such as Josephus, but also because it is completely out of context where it was inserted (ie it disturbs the natural flow of the text). Moreover however, Alice Whealey (in 2008) refuted the thesis that the Arabic fragment of the Testimonium supports its authenticity. It does not, because the Arabic fragment does not come from Josephus at all. It comes from Eusebius, through the intermediary of a well-known Syriac translation of Eusebius. We're you aware of this? If so, why do you not mention it?
@InspiringPhilosophy7 жыл бұрын
Actually most scholars believe it is authentic but interpolated. See the sources I gave when I went over that. Obviously I am aware the arabic passages comes from intermediary sources. I gave the sources in the video that show where it was written down. The doesn't show it is false and supports the interpolated hypothesis.
@kierenmoore32367 жыл бұрын
You said that "Most scholars accept this passage was ... originally more like what is found in the Arabic manuscript." You are using 'argumentum ad populum' fallacy, to support an assertion that is demonstrably untrue. I asked you whether you knew that it has been demonstrated that the Arabic manuscript was merely, in fact, a 10th C translation, of an 8th C Syriac Chronicle (Theophilus of Odessa's), derived from a 5th C Syriac translation, derived from **Eusebius'** 4th C Historian Ecclesiastica, containing the gushing, Christianised version of Josephus ... and you answered with some vague acknowledgement that the Josephus passage is an interpolation ... as if anyone disputes that. A red herring. So, were you aware of the Arabic manuscript's providence, as I have set out above, and - if so - why are you giving the impression (in your video) that Josephus' writing was probably "originally more like what is found in the Arabic manuscript.", when the Arabic manuscript is an Arabic translation, of a Syriac derivation, of a Syriac translation, of **Eusebius'**!!!!??!! The impression created by your video is, therefore, misleading.
@InspiringPhilosophy7 жыл бұрын
No, an ad populum fallacy would be saying something is true because most people believe it. I am saying most experts agree it was interpolated because of the evidence. Appealing to experts is not a fallacy. The arabic script fits with the internal writing style of Jospehus. Again, see the sources I give listed at 3:22
@000UnPlugged0009 жыл бұрын
hey. how can i reach the channel managers?? i would like to get promission to make the same video in hebrew...
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Mike SchvedoV Sure, that is fine with me.
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Mike SchvedoV By the way if you make closed captioning in Hebrew may I ask you give me the file as well so I can upload it to this video?
@kindahotchillipeppers38954 жыл бұрын
The Holy Spirit teaches of Christ even without the new testament because it is a continuous story from the Torah, the wisdom literature, prophetic books, Ruth and Esther too. People think the christian faith is crippled without the new testament. The journey of the Israelites from bondage to the promised land in the hands of the God the Father is literally the foreshadowing of the redeemed believer journey of sanctification from bondage to sin to the promised New Creation effected by God the Spirit. Even the destruction of the pagan child-sacrificing cultures such as the cananites is the complete repentance of the believer's sin, literally uprooting the sinful inhabitants of the heart completely and totally with no remnant left behind. The foreshadowing is so on the nose literally Israel was the name of one man,Jacob. The individual walking with God in obedience and rebellion at times, requiring disciplinary action and repentance until the moment of death, which is the crossing from the border of the desert of sanctification into the promised land where you are glorified for eternity. The Holy Scripture testifies of the Father, The Christ and the Spirit without even reading a word of the Gospel. The Torah suffices. The transition from a communal relationship to individual relationship was what Christ took human form to accomplish. Now the believer is 'Israel' who is shedding his rebellious nature, like the generation that died in the desert,and the new obedient version of the individual who is the result of the sanctification process is equipped for eternal life in worshipping the Creator. This would have been impossible without Salvation through the second person of God, Jesus Christ, the Infinite one who satisfied infinite wrath with infinite sacrifice for a secure relationship with the Creator. That is always the point to know and be known by the Holy One.
@slimvalentine4185 жыл бұрын
You have no proof of any of his miricles. Then tell me how these witnesses (who weren't present during the cursifiction) have any weight on their claims? You literally are using everything but evidence.
@InspiringPhilosophy5 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/d2HMdYGCrdKKjK8
@christophermunn38195 жыл бұрын
The gospel of Luke, does not claim to be an eye witness account.
@pJ005-k9i4 жыл бұрын
It claims to interview eyewitnesses
@legron121 Жыл бұрын
@@pJ005-k9i No, it doesn't. Luke's preface nowhere says that he interviewed any eyewitnesses.
@pJ005-k9i Жыл бұрын
@@legron121 it literally says it in the very beginning of the book
@legron121 Жыл бұрын
@@pJ005-k9i No, it says that the Gospel was "handed down to us from eyewitnesses". In other words, Luke is saying that the oral traditions ultimately came from eyewitnesses, not that he personally knew or spoke to any eyewitnesses. The Jewish accusers in Acts 6:14 speak of "the law that Moses handed down to us". That doesn't mean they knew Moses personally!
@pJ005-k9i Жыл бұрын
@@legron121 unless you want to claim that the eyewitnesses are dead at the time Luke waswriting, your argument doesn't hold much water, Luke says that these things that he is writting came from eyewitnesses, just as the law came from moses, the burden of proof is on you to show that the eyewitnesses at the time luke was writting were dead, good luck with that, I mean Luke said he is going to write an ordely account, pretty sure that is hard when you don't have eyewitness testimony around you
@d_fendr62227 жыл бұрын
@InspiringPhilosophy So I had watched this video from the famous atheist channel "Religion, Atheism, Science" about Jesus's tomb. However my question is not really on the video itself (you should watch it anyways, it's only like 2 minutes), but rather on the comments (there aren't that many people who commented, so I ask that you also read all of their comments). One of the objections was that John records Nicodemus having Jesus buried with 75 lbs of spices, but Gamaliel's tomb had about 80 lbs of spices, so supposedly the Gospels got the details wrong because the Romans would never had let that happen. One other objection (which is really a theory, yet it seems plausible to me) is that there were many sects of Christianity (Richard Carrier argues one sect believed Jesus had already been born and existed many years prior, so he argues Jesus could not exist), Paul was promoting one sect, Mark then added in details of a historical Jesus to try to bring him into existence. So is it true the Gospels got their details wrong, and Paul and Mark destroyed other sects of Christianity?
@InspiringPhilosophy7 жыл бұрын
70lb and 80lb are very close. I have not heard of rule that it had to be 80 lbs of spices. Yeah, see here: kzbin.info/www/bejne/qJfJnqWfpKuheLs There is no way Paul believed that. We also have no solid evidence of competing sects. Carrier will find anything to make his fringe interpretation work.
@d_fendr62227 жыл бұрын
@InspiringPhilosophy Now this is probably a bit nit-picky, but Josephus records Jesus ben Damneus was the replacement priest in the same passage he mentions James, whom Damneus also had a brother named James. Could it be that the description of Jesus, "who was called Christ", is actually resulted from, say, the accidental insertion of a marginal note added by some unknown reader, and the James mentioned is actually Damneus' brother?
@nathanwalsh63004 жыл бұрын
@@d_fendr6222 There is a good article that goes over that very question you brought up if you care to check it out. explanationblog.wordpress.com/2009/01/25/jesus-the-brother-of-james-son-of-damneus/
@matt6549 жыл бұрын
Very nice like usual IP. Josephus in the first passage says Jesus was a doer of wonderful works, but in the second he doesn't. Sometimes I use Josephus like the talmud for evidence that Jesus was known as a miracle worker (as well as Celsus and the enemies in the Gospel narratives) do you think its better not to?
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Matt Lord No, I would use it.
@matt6549 жыл бұрын
Oh okay, and can you check your messages please? I was challenged by someone, and I don't know QM well enough (yet) to respond..Do you know how to?
@01DigitalWorld9 жыл бұрын
Can you address post tribulation, pre-tribulation and mid tribulation in the future video?
@InspiringPhilosophy9 жыл бұрын
Siang Sure, but I reject all three as a partial preterist.
@andrewprahst25294 жыл бұрын
Music source?
@anthonyp45619 жыл бұрын
Great stuff. One issue though: According to linguists who are Orthodox, honest Protestants, or Catholic, Jesus had no brothers. The use of 'brother' most likely denoted cousins or the concept of brothers in arms or brothers in a cause. Other than that, great stuff.
@theOzzzmeister8 жыл бұрын
My friend that is a well known Catholic argument to refute Biblical facts for the purpose of portraying the mother of Christ as a perpetual virgin. Please do your own research, and grow. Good luck.
@theisticlogos25395 жыл бұрын
The Bible never says Mary didn’t have any kids after Jesus, Paul and the Gospels both say Jesus had brothers, and that’s what most scholars who are honest think today. Jesus had brothers.
@thesirevn3349 жыл бұрын
Now, IP will you do an OT Reliability video?
@SomeRandomDude0000009 жыл бұрын
+Thesirevn he says hes planning on it in the future
@thesirevn3349 жыл бұрын
+Wayne Ekeh Yeah ik . It's something I wanna know more about not just the dead sea scrolls. lol
@samnikole16437 жыл бұрын
+Thesirevn look at the evidence found in the Red Sea
@DVEX10005 жыл бұрын
Very interesting. Here the riddles I'm hoping to see solved - Why are the Gospels written by 'anonymous' authors? Why are these gospels written in Greek when Jesus spoke Aramaic? Because the original codecs of the Greek and Hebrew writings are missing or lost for over 1500 yrs, is it possible, a shadow of doubt, that the New Testament can be effectively debated on either side of it's actual existence including deception or misleading interpretation or findings? This all sounds wonderful but just because we want it to be, don't mean it is. Many Christian's know there's no historical proof to refute any claims made in favor of the New Testament discoveries, as well as not having evidence to defend it from outside claims as well. This all begins with the rediscovery of the original writings or the names and background of the authors including the explanation of why they chose anonymity, to allow so much time to pass before writing, if they we're of the same clans from Greece, etc. This is critical for credibility of factual truth. I believe it exists. Hidden by Rome, possibly. But without it, nothing can be referenced to nothing and theory is just a fancy word for opinion
@jarodhensel1075 жыл бұрын
He goes over almost all of these questions in other videos in this series